Tax amount difference in Invoice verification (MIRO) and PO

Hi Experts,
I create a PO of say 10000/- and 2% tax so the total po value is 10020/-. It is calculating correctly. But while doing the GR the GR/IR value is less say 8500/- .I don't no the reason it is picking the wrong value.The price control in material master is 'V'. While doing the MIRO the amount is coming 10000 but tax calculation is 25/- instead of 20. What may be the possible reasons for this ? Please help.
Thanks
Arun

Hi Arun
If ur material has Std price in material master accounting view then that price will get updated in GRN instead f the price in PO thru info record.
Check that.
Also is ur tax procedure is TAXINJ or TAXINN.
In MIRO click on simulate and check what is the G/L that causes extra amount and let us know from which we cn help u better.
Reg
Raja

Similar Messages

User exit during invoice verification (MIRO) and PO creation

Hi,
    I have a following scenario to be support by ABAP development
1. During invoice verification (MIRO) system should allow users to manually make any changes in amount and qty proposed by system.
2. During purchase order creation i need a warning message in case of this po is first creating for that particular article and vendor combination.
   so that user will get alerted in case of wrongly choosen the vendor.Many a times user create wrong po, wrong GR and wrong invoice.
since the business process activities are decentralized, person who is making GR is differ from the peron who had created po and invoice.
Ex: material DCF is supplying by vendor VLC international, where there is one more vendor name with VLC traders. due to this name some time users will prepare wrong po, wrong GR and wrong invoice.
   plz suggest how can i suggest my ABAPER to control this mistakes.

Hi,
you can check out the following exits while PO creation:
EXIT_SAPMM06E_006
EXIT_SAPMM06E_007
EXIT_SAPMM06E_008
EXIT_SAPMM06E_009
EXIT_SAPMM06E_012
EXIT_SAPMM06E_013
EXIT_SAPMM06E_014
EXIT_SAPMM06E_016
EXIT_SAPMM06E_017
EXIT_SAPMM06E_018
Thanks.

Same nr range in Invoice Verification (MIRO) and FI document

Dear all can you please help to solve this issue?
We would like to have the same number range for invoice verification and for financial document, what we have to do?
Regards
Marco

Please follow the steps as below
Step 1. Maintain FI document number range. Use transaction OMR4 and go to Number range for document types in FI. Select the company code for which you want to create the new number range interval and click on the change interval button. Insert a new document number range by clicking on the insert interval button on top of the screen.for example, I created number range interval 52 with the document numbers 5200000000 5299999999. Don't forget to set the external number range check box (Ext).
Step 2. Assign FI number range to FI document types. The second step is to assign the number range created in step 1 to the FI document type for invoices. Again use transaction OMR4 and go to Document type. Double-click on the document type, which you are using for LIV invoices. In my example, I used the SAP standard document type RE. In the number range field, assign the new number range interval 52
Step 3. Maintain MM document number ranges. Use transaction OMRJ and click on change interval button. Insert a new document number range by clicking on the insert button at the top of the screen. For MM documents, I created number range interval 52 with the document numbers 5200000000 5299999999. For the internal number range assignment, do not set the external number range check box (Ext).
Step 4. Update MM number range assignment. The last step is to assign the MM number range to your MM transaction via IMG menu path Materials Management>Logistics Invoice Verification>Incoming Invoice>Number Assignment>Maintain Number Assignments for Logistic Documents>Transaction Assign Number ranges. Two transactions are available. LIV contains the following two internal transactions that are used for the MM document number determination:
RD: manual invoice entry (MIRO)
RS: cancel, reverse invoice (MR8M), evaluated receipt settlement (MRRL), EDI invoice receipt, invoicing plan (MRIS), and revaluation (MRNB).
You need to update the number range interval for transaction RD.
hope now that things r clear
reward accordingly

Tolerance for Tax Amount difference

Dear All,
In certain cases the tax amount given in the invoice is different from the tax calculated by the system.
Please help me, where to make the configuration so as to accept a difference of 0.05 INR between the calculated tax amount and the tax amount in the invoice. (It will be of immense help if given with the IMG path too).
As an example:
Base Amount: 100, Tax Rate: 5%
Now calculated tax amount is 5
But tax amount in the invoice has come as 5.04.
Please advise.
Regards
B.Mohanty

Hi Umesh,
Thank you very much for your kind and quick response.
Yes, I have tried that option of correcting the tax amount. But am getting an message
"The system checks the tax amounts for each code on document level. However, the amounts entered deviate more from the amounts calculated (using the percentage rates defined in tax code) than is allowed considering rounding errors".
Can you please advise what does this rounding errors mean.
Regards
B.Mohanty

Field Selection for - Invoice Verification (MIRO)

Dear Experts,
Can anybody please explain how make Field selection for INVOICE VERIFICATION (MIRO).
I want BUSINESS AREA field mandatory in MIRO.
Thanks in Advance

Hi,
Business area is linked to other organizational units (plant, division,
distribution chanel, cost center). It can be defined using assigments
(e. cost centers to the business area) or combinations of information
(like plant and division determination).
It is usually derived from the account assignments of the cost items
and inherited from there into the vendor line item.
For MIRO,to automatically fill the business area it must be able to
uniquely identify a business area.
This means that for multiple materials each one must have the same
business area for IV to fill the vendor line item.
This is the way the system is designed.
The business area can be set as 'optional' field and is not 'mandatory'
by design.It can be customised according to the individual needs.
Please check the field status in tr OB41/OB14 and OB23 for the vendor.
Best Regards,
Arminda Jack

Invoice verification (MIRO) filed selection

Hi Experts,
Could please explain, where we can invoice verification MIRO field selection.
I want to change invoice party field selection which in the MIRO header - Details tab from display mode to change mode.
My requirement is to change invoice party in the MIRO screen other than the PO vendor.
Could you explain, where these settings are exist in the configuration?
How we can make invoice party field selection from display mode to change mode?
Could you explain ASAP.
Regards
KRK

Hi,
Go to: IMG->MM->LIV->Incoming Invoice
Enter these details and make Inv. Party as you want
Transaction          MIRO
Screen variant       0001_000_0150
Program              SAPLFDCB
Screen               150
Hope this helps!
Reetesh

Amount difference (0.01) between GL and profit center reporting

Hi,
After we run 1KEK for ARAP transfer to profit center there is amount difference (0.01) between GL and profit center reporting for customere reconciliation account. We checked F.5D and rerun 1KEK this issue still exit.
Any idea for it? Thanks.

hi Kyle,
thanks for the effort, but it wasn't the thing i asked for ...
what i would like to find out is:
if CO area settings are set w/o profit centers, why the system still demands profit center assignment with cost center master data (ie.)
well, i can always turn off the message, but this isn't the solution i want to use ...
i will rather open one PC (along with dummy, of course) even though those are not used for the customer ... although, this will not solve statistical posting to cc with cost element category 11 ...
d.

Invoice Tax amount difference than GR tax amount

Hi experts,
I got one issue from client the GR amount is 552873.75, and tax is93,988.54
and they got invoice from vendor showing amount 552873.75 and tax is93,988.50
when the user was trying to make the invoice verification he was trying to put 93,988.50
then mess were getting tax amount not correct 93,988.50(correct is93,988.54
we can resolve this by doing like this
we can make invoice verification as per GR amount and then balance we post through FB41.
IF IT is not right please let me know
Thanks
JC

Hi joshi,
what you have told is right we can deactivate check box in ftxp tax code then we can able to make invoice i know.
but only for one document we cant do it right there will be impact on other documents also.
please let me know is there any alternative solution.
Regards
JC
Edited by: c naidu on Jan 5, 2010 4:44 AM

Invoice Verification (MIRO) posting, showing an error on Tax Code

Hello
When i am making MIRO posting it is showing that the specific tax code which i has given is not maintained in the Tax Procedure, but i have checked all the CIN Configurations, Activated the CIN and Tax Procedure is assigned to Country also and rest all is fine,i hav even created the Tax Code but still it is showing that, the TAX CODE is not maintained in Tax Procedure.
Plz help me out,

Hi Minhaj,
Please goto FTXP & check if the tax rates are maintained for the given tax code. If they are maintained then check if accounts are entered by clicking on the acconts tab.
If you are maintaining Jurisrdiction codes, please ensure that you are entering the correct jurisdiction code for the tax code you have entered.
Please ensure that you are using the same Tax code & Jurisdiction code in MIRO as is there in MIGO.
Hope this helps.
Thank you.
Regards,
AVD

Difference in Invoice verification ( GR/IR)- for Line item wise

Hi,
I have done invoice verification against PO but in my PO having 4 line items 10 to 40 so while doing invoice verification i have made a mistake in line item 10 i made quantity +1008 made extra and in line item 20 i have made less 1008 and i get to know information while doing MR11 line itme show higher quantity and lower quanty so GR/IR Clearing in not possible bacause of difference quantity and so i already paid entry tax on this PO and i can not do MR8M, is their solution workaround to nullyfy the line item
could u suggest if any kind of solution i will appriciate for ur valid suggestion.
Regards
Vinu.

Hi
If MR8M is not possible, then you can post a credit note using the same T.code MIRO for the difference for the excess quantity and later later post an invoice for the short posted quantity.
Regards

RE.Can We do (MIGO) Batch No based Logistics Invoice Verification(MIRO)

Dear All
While doing invoice verification reference to MIGO Doc. we are not able to see Vendor Batch No field in MIRO Screens.
I.e
Item No. 10 100No's as per DC/Invoice Received stores were Accepted. But in Production QC Accepted 80 No's 20 Rejected in Batch.625268.
Batch.625261 = 20No's
Batch.625268 = 25No's
Batch.625263 = 25No's
Batch.625305 = 40No's
While doing Invoice verification FI do MIRO only for accepted qty. But FI User reduced Qty. in Batch 625263 instead of 625268.
Because in MIRO screens We are not able to find Vendor Batch Field form MIGO.
Please advise how to GET Batch Field in MIRO Screen.
Regards:
P. Ramana Reddy.

Hi Anil,
could you tell me which PO type to be used in such case.
Secondly it is quite confusing to me.
In your reply, you had mentioned that you post the inbound delivey document prior to booking the CVD using MIRO. then how you are able to post it again using VL32N (change Inbound delivery Transaction)
Actually i'm looking for scenario as mentioned below.
1 Import PO is created with all applicable tax condition
2 Inbound Delivery is created (using VL31N), but not Posted.
3 MIRO Invoice is booked for CVD Duties.
For MIRO Invoicing System Should propose the Qty and Value based on the inbound delivery
4 then we will do the Good Receipt either from VL32N( by Posting the Inbound Delivery) or from MIGO against Inbound delivery.
5. Later we will post the Vendor Invoice.
In Step 3, if i have to book the MIRO (CVD Portion) Manually, then i have no issue in my process.
Can you through some light on how i can make the system to propose the CVD Value while creating MIRO for custom duties.
Regards,
S Anand

Amount authorization in invoice verification

Dear all,
I am facing a problem while third party sales. During MIRO, Invoice verification, i enter the PO and the amount when i get try to save, i get the message- no amount authorization for customers/vendors in the company code.
Thanx in advance.
Regards,
Pankaj

Hi
Check the tolerance groups defined for your comapny for posting invoices with certain amount in IMG - MM - LIV - Authorization mgment - define tolerance groups & assign users to tolerance groups. We define the groups to limit posting invoices exceeding certain amount here.
Thanks

Invoice Verification MIRO

Dear All,
This is about invoice verification block after MIRO posting-
In PO we have set it as 2 way match, once the PO is equal to Invoice verification then the system should not put any payment block. But if it doesnt match the value of PO to IV then the system should put invoice verifcation block (R) in the accounting document.
Here, whatever we post that is whether the PO value is matching or not the invoice verification block (R) is appearing in the accounting document. Does any one gone through similar issue....
I want to know how this can happen?
Checked validations but nothing that sort appears.....is there a way to find out how this happens....
Thanks to all in advance.

Hello
I do not know of any BAPI. But you can set an automatic block up through your payment terms.
Check the following customizing path for this:
Financial Accounting
->Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable
   ->Business Transactions
     ->Incoming Invoices/Credit Memos
       ->Maintain Terms of Payment
Select the details for the payment term and check for the indicator there to set the default block key.
Hope this helps
Ray

Invoice verification(MIRO) for consignment

Dear ALL,
I have two questions about invoice verification.
1.Now we create PO for consignment material. For consignment material, we use MRKO to settle the GI and generate the AP. However, when we do IV via MIRO by selecting vendor, some consignment PO GR records also pop up. Can we hide those POs during invoice verification?
2.For some PO which IV is done, we can also display some blank items in MIRO, can we hids those items also?
Thanks,
Gary

Hi, all
Does anybody can answer my questions?
Thanks in advance,
Gary

Invoice Verification (MIRO) allocation via Delivery note

We are in 5.00 version
In our system the same Delivery note number could be associated not only to different vendor, but even to the same vendor in different years.
In the last case the system allocate ALL the Delivery notes.
I try to use the F4 function to limit the selection, using filter on vendor and document date, but after the again all the delivery note for the selected vendor are allocate.
Could anybody help me on this.
thanks
Claudio

In our organisation we are doing MIRO with reference to Delivery note. As same number of delivery note is being submiited by multiple vendors, after entry of that delivery note in MIRO system shows large list (Closed & Open for MIRO). This becomes difficult to select the required delivery note.
Is it possible to make display of only those delivery notes against which MIRO (Invoice verification has not done).
Also MIRO with reference to GRN number is possible or not ?
HI,
To avoid difficulties post miro with Reference document (PO Reference Tab) - Delivery note click on Radio button a possible entries for delivery note screen will appear. Here you can search specific delivery note by a lot of criteria which will save ur time and effort also you can see MIGO Document. Click and put tick to adopt and post Delivery note / migo and enter required field.

Tax amount difference in Invoice verification (MIRO) and PO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for