Invoiced items not on PO

Is there a way to do an invoice reduction for items that are invoiced by a vendor but not on the PO? Can we do an invoice reduction directly form MIRO without ajdusting the PO or adding the parts to the PO?

This scenario does not make sense to me and I'm not even sure it's possible with SAP.   If I understand your example you have the following:
1) PO with one line item   A a quantity of 100
2) GR for your PO for line item A for a quantity of 100
2) the vendor sends an invoice for line item A for 100 and line item B for 50
3) If you are entering the invoice using MIRO, I was not aware it was possible to enter a line item that is not associated with a PO?
4) Why would you want to enter an invoice for a material that is not on the PO and has not been GRd?
5) As far as inventory goes - IRs do not affect the inventory - it will affect the inventory value but in terms of the actual quantity you have in stock the IR does not have anything to do with that.   Then again not sure how that works if the item was never received into inventory in the first place.
One option would be to return the invoice to the vendor and have them create a correct invoice.
Sandra

Similar Messages

Net Unit Price of Invoice Item Not Kept/Deleted

Hello everyone,
Yesterday I had an issue with a supplier invoice uploader I've created --- it uploads consistently which is nice, but for some reason the unit price is disappearing on me. I've got the following lines:
in which 'row.zItemNetUnitPrice' is decimal (currencyCode is always going to be GBP in this case, so I figured I didn't need it) and row.zAmountOrdered is obviously a Quantity type. Now, here's the strange part: when 'newSIItem' is created using siItem, the unit price is deleted --- as in, immediately after creation of newSIItem, the unit price is set to 0.00. But the amount ordered is kept as it was set. So obviously that's weird, and is causing all my invoice items to be created as zero price --- you'll agree that's not very helpful.
What's also strange is that, in order to remedy this I tried to just set the unit price to what I wanted AFTER newSIItem was created, as according to the repository explorer it's not read-only. This worked --- up until I set the account assignment type, at which point it got set BACK to zero as follows:
As you can see in the debugger, it says 'changing invoice price not possible...'. --- but the net unit price field isn't read-only. So my overall question is: what the hell is going on? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Attached is my entire mass-enabled AfterModify script and the XML file I'm using as part of a file input run on the custom business object to which this script belongs. Thanks!
Lewis
EDIT: I tried moving 'newSI.NetUnitPrice.Amount.content = row.zItemNetUnitPrice' to after the account assignment --- it seems it was invalidated by any subsequent command, even to the point that having it directly before setting gross amount to total gross amount would still not work. I also tried setting net amount instead of net unit price --- the debugger specifically told me that net amount is read-only. But the repository explorer says it has write access. Anyone able to shed light on this?

I solved this --- I noticed that I had siRoot.DocumentGrossAmountsIndicator set to false but creating the root node (newSI = SupplierInvoice.Create(siRoot)) turned that back to true again for no apparent reason. My guess is that having this set to true, i.e. all values are gross, dynamically sets all net fields to read-only. Once I discovered this it was as simple as setting the indicator back to false post-creation of the root node, and then net price fields were accessible again.

SRM 7.0 - Unconfirmed PO limit items not showing up when creating Invoice

Hi Guys,
For PO standard items, when creating an invoice and is unconfirmed, these items still show up in the invoice screen and the invoice gets created with the status 'Waiting for preceding document'. For unconfirmed limit items, these items do not show up at all in the creation of the invoice and displays an error. My question is how will I make the unconfirmed limit items scenario work just like the standard items scenario whereby instead of the unconfirmed limit items not showing up and generating an error, they will show up and have the invoice created with the status 'Waiting for preceding document'?
Thanks in advance!

Is this thread still valid? If not, please close the thread.
If so, as no response has been submitted, please rephrase your question and/or provide further information to describe your requirement.
Thanks
Jason
SDN SRM Moderator Team

PO line item not getting invoiced...

Hi SAP Gurus,
I am facing one problem.PO has been processed successfully but invoice is not getting generated for one of the line item.Can you guide me in this issue ?

Hi,
You may be trying to create the invoice without doing the Good Receipt for that line item.
Rgds,
SAP Friend

Remove pymt blk-Item specified for invoice reference is not an invoice item

Hi Gurus,
we have posted the credit note with reference to the invoice which has block set "A" (blocked for payment).
Therefore credit note has inherrited the payment block from the invoice.
We have manually removed the payment block from the credit note and clreared it.
Now when they manually trying to remove the payment block from the invoice, it is issuing the follwing error message:
"Item specified for invoice reference is not an invoice item"
Does this mean that we need to set the payment block A to the credit note and then try to remove it from the invoice?
Please assist.
thanks - Anil

Hello,
This seems to be a configuration issue or you might be entering the wrong details.
This is a standard transaction. IF you feel there is nothing wrong, then search for OSS notes on http://service.sap.com to see if there is a solution to this problem.
cheers,
sushil joshi

Idoc in error while trying to post vendor invoice(higher items not allowed)

Hi All,
we have two SAP systems. SAP A and SAP B.
SAP A is the vendor for SAP B system we have created a sales order/delivery/out bound invoice in SAP A system.The sales order has BOM material with main item and sub items. We have the same material master data and BOM master data in system A and system B since we are following split architecture.
The outbound invoice(with main and sub item) in system A has generated an outbound idoc and the idoc has gone to SAP
system B. There are the usual segments like E1EDP01 for main item and another E1EDp01 for the sub itmes in the outbound
idoc.The message type is INVOIC and basic type INVOIC02 with no extension.
In system B, the inbound idoc (coming from system A) has failed giving the error message "higher level items not allowed". The
segment E1EDP01 for sub item is highlighted in red ! basically the inbound idoc in sap system B is posting a vendor
invoice since the inbound idoc in B is calling the FM IDOC_INPUT_INVOIC_MRM... I think this is doing vendor invoice
verification.
I have checked in system A, all is ok and the outbound idoc is ok but the issue is in sap system B, the inbound idoc has failed
with message "higher level items not allowed". The segment E1EDP01 for sub item is highlighted in red in inbound idoc in
system B. The segments are the same for inbound idoc in B and outbound idoc in A.
Can someone pls tell what is wrong in system B.(config or data issue) as we are managing both systems.
regds
Edited by: sapsd73 on Jul 9, 2010 3:26 PM
Edited by: sapsd73 on Jul 9, 2010 3:27 PM

I do not see any reason why you would need to use COND_A04 if COND_A01 is working.
What if you could get COND_A04 to post and you would face the same result as in COND_A01?
If SAP does not check wrong values, then you have to do it yourself, or you report an incident at SAP (after you have searched for OSS notes that may have fixed this error already)
For example OSS Note 1169998 - IDoc: KONP-LIFNR values not checked
fixed a situation where the vendor number was not validated.

Items to list in invoice but not wanted to post into accounting

Hi - We have a BOM, both header and components are price related. We want header material to have net value as a sum of all component's net value, and we wanted to bring all the components into invoice (Del Related) but only header material will be posted into accounting but not the components. We want components to show in invoice but not into accounting. Any ideas to complete this need??
Reg
Siva

Hi Siva,
Please refer to note 77414, situation 1 for this.
If you want the VPRS also cumulated on the main item, you would also need to implement the solution
from note 352441.
The note explains the solution by taking item category TAN & ZTAN as an example.
Please implement accordingly based on your own item categore.
Regards,
Alex

Vendor Line Item not cleared after F110

Hi Gurus,
We encountered an issue. The payment run was processed last April 18 and the vendor invoices were captured during the payment run and in the aging report, these invoices didn't appear as Open Item.
In between April 19 until August 19, these invoices are not part of the proposal list until the when they run payment on August 20. The value is zero and in the proposal list, there is a value in the Reason to Print Advice "A".
What is the reason for this?
Thank you.

Hi Dianne Obviar,
For that invoice payment delete uncompleted payment
proposal.
U go through this path select F4 in run date field
There check it any un completed proposal is there and delete
that invoice line item will come for payable
Regards
Surya

Line Item Not dispaying in Payment Advice standard report

Hi Experts,
I have cleared line items of a vendor by making payment through F-53 and subsequently generated the Print Form spoon request through FBZ5. But in the print, line items (cleared Items) doesn't display in Payment advice report. But for the Fiscal Year 2009 line items (Cleared item) was displaying in the Payment Advice report which is now not displaying.Since it is a standard report no changes made. So please suggest how to achieve it.
Thanks in Advance,
Arabinda

Hello,
In tr. F-53 you post a payment document,
but to print a check you need to use some check printing program.
SAP-delivered program is RFFOUS_C and it processes only
one bank line per payment document.
Please check the following general information:
The standard form (of the print program RFFOUS_C) prints the invoice
items followed by the check. If the item details overflow to the next
page, then the first check (eg cheque no. 1) will be voided and you'll
get the valid cheque on second page (eg cheque no. 2). This is standard
functionality.
Also I would request you to recheck your customising in FBZP i.e.
    -> Click on the 'Payment methods in company code' button
    -> Double click on the appropriate 'Pymt meth.'
       -> Click on the 'Pyt adv. ctrl' button
          ¦ Note to payee lines on the form /               ¦
          ¦                                                  ¦
          ¦ O restricted to                       98 Rows   ¦
          ¦ O None                                          ¦
          ¦ O as many as req                                ¦
          ¦__________________________________________________¦
- The first option will restrict the number of lines on the form to a
value from 1 to a maximum of 98.
- The second option will restrict the number of lines on the form to
zero.
- The third option option will not restrict the number of lines on the
form.
You may test in the system which among the three options will suit your
needs. There is a documentation available at the side of each button.
Also please check whether the problem happens with the standard SAP
program. You may wish to review the documentation for RFFOUS_C via
transaction SE38 -> Enter program name -> Select 'Documentation' radio
button -> Display -> scroll to 'Setting up and changing the SAPscript
forms (layout sets)'.
Also you can refer to the parameter `No form summary section' in the
variant of RFFOUS_C. By setting this indicator, you can prevent the form
summary section from being printed hence the overflow is avoided and
thus eliminates the voided check issue. Please refer to F1 Help of this
field for further information.
Also please refer to the F1 help on the indicator "Indicator: Do not
Void any Checks" in the selection screen of payment program RFFOUS_C.
I hope this helps.
BR,
Raquel

FI Archiving - System error: Customer/vendor line item not on OI basis

While archiving FI Documetns using object FI_Documnt, I am getting message System error: Customer/vendor line item not on OI basis for few non archivable documents. Is it like these also open items and can not be able to archive them. Or what is the root cause of these error message.
Regards,
Shailesh

Hi Adisha,
This error pertains to the accounting fundamentals and SAP does not have anything to do with this....you ask yourself that if you were not using SAP and simlar problem came your way what would you have done...this has no solution...
Either you wait for the next invoice with big amount but which seems bit impractical..
In this we really need to consult the Accounting Standards to see what it could allow.
Regards,
Chintan Joshi

Link between SD invoice item and corresponding accounting document item

Hi,
I have a problem regarding the link between the items of an SD invoice ( or
credit note ) and those of the corresponding accounting document. There's a
custom report which extracts information about each credit/debit note
produced within a certain period. This program has recently failed due to a
particular case: a credit note was generated starting by two note requests;
in other terms, cardinality: 1:N exists between the credit note and the
request document. Currently, the program generates duplicated records in
this case, because of the following schema:
-> main loop on VBAK data ( request document header data )
-> inner loop on BSEG data ( accounting document items );
our current access criteria in reading tb_bseg is only:
... where tb_bseg-belnr = tb_vbrk-vbeln.
Providing that tb_vbrk-vbeln doesn't differ and that both tb_vbak and tb_bseg
contain two records ( the two requests the first and the two accounting
document items the second ), the program fails as follows:
° first request -> two lines
° second request -> two lines.
Is there any way to link each invoice item with the corresponding credit
note item?
Thanks in advance to all of you.
Adrian.

Hi,
I have a problem regarding the link between the items of an SD invoice ( or
credit note ) and those of the corresponding accounting document. There's a
custom report which extracts information about each credit/debit note
produced within a certain period. This program has recently failed due to a
particular case: a credit note was generated starting by two note requests;
in other terms, cardinality: 1:N exists between the credit note and the
request document. Currently, the program generates duplicated records in
this case, because of the following schema:
-> main loop on VBAK data ( request document header data )
-> inner loop on BSEG data ( accounting document items );
our current access criteria in reading tb_bseg is only:
... where tb_bseg-belnr = tb_vbrk-vbeln.
Providing that tb_vbrk-vbeln doesn't differ and that both tb_vbak and tb_bseg
contain two records ( the two requests the first and the two accounting
document items the second ), the program fails as follows:
° first request -> two lines
° second request -> two lines.
Is there any way to link each invoice item with the corresponding credit
note item?
Thanks in advance to all of you.
Adrian.

Excise Invoice should not get created without J1ID data for all material

Dear All,
We have a requirement that excise invoice should not get generated unless chapter ID data is maintained for all the materials in the invoice.( when there is more than one item and chapter id is not maintained for all the items)
At present excise invoice is getting generated for single item which has chapter ID maintained and the items without chapter ID data are left out from the excise invoice. This results in an incorrect invoice.
We want to ensure that excise invoice is not created, unless all the items in the billing document have chapter ID maintained.
Kindly advise as to how this can be done.
Regards,
T Saravanan

Dear Muralidhar, Lakshmipathi,
Thanks for the solution.
I have been able to solve the problem using the user exit mentioned by you.
Regards,
T Saravanan

Invoice is not getting posted to accounts it is showing the export error

invoice is not getting posted to accounts, it is showing an error of foreign trade / export data. where as it is with in the country. it is maintained for the plants abroad stock transport order.

A stock transport order to a location overseas etails crossing national borders and change of legal regulations. hence you need to maintina FT data. Please check the FT data in the billing header and item and maintian them. They are simple items like customs offices meas of transport...
This will give you a green status from the red status you will initially have. Then you can post the invoice.
regds

Excise Invoice can not be capture for RG1 in STO

Hi All,
I created a Purchase order for STO with the help of STO I created Replenishment delivery then JEX Invoice then Excise Invoice. At the time of MIGO I put the Excise invoice no. for capturing the excise duty. now when i am saving the MIGO system generating an error " Excise Invoice can not capture the RG1"
Please throw your valuable suggestion.
Regards
Shambhu Sarkar

Hi ,
I am sure u r doing MIRO w.r.t PO after u have done MIGO of that document...
Check that how many line items u have in MIGO and wether it is coming it MIRO or not...
I would also suggest pl look into the MAP and Standard price in accounting view of material.
Reply.
Dipak

How to get the Shipping status of a Invoice items in SAP?

Hi All,
Is there any way to get the Shipping status of a Invoiced Item ?
While i extracting Sales Invoice lines,i can get the shipping method and the shipping date,how can i confirm whether the item is shipped or not?.
Is there any table which contains the shipping status or any column in Invoice lines(INV1) which contains the shipping status?
Please help me to come out from that problem
Thanks
JanakiRaman

Hello Gilbert,
The column what you specified INV1.TRNSCODE is to know how the shipping was done. My question, Is there any field to specify the material was shipped or not?
Thanks
Janakiraman

Invoiced items not on PO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for