Invoicing in SRM 5.0 - Mismatch between categories

Hi SRM-folks,
Im trying to enter a Service invoice with 3 positions in SRM 5.0
At checking the invoice before saving it, for the last two positions I get the error message:
"Product category in purchase order and invoice do not match "
I Checked the product category of the items and they do exist both in SRM as in the Backend.
I tried to enter the invoice in the backend via the trx MIRO and I managed to do that without problems!
The Product cat ID in the shopping cart is the same as in the invoice (for all of the three positions).
The Category GUIDs are corresponding to the Category ID in the COMM_CATEGORY Table in SRM.
What Im I doing wrong in this case? What do I have to check?
Thanks,
Aart

Not necesary anymore

Similar Messages

There is a mismatch between order type and GL accountu201D.

Hello
Can any one help me to know why I am getting this error message.
Here I am giving the steps carried out.
Step1. Using transaction code: FB60 I have posted a vendor invoice to a Machinery account GL account against a internal order.
Step2. A down payment using transaction code FBA7. using a special indicator M to a bank account.
Step3. When I am trying to clear the open item (by selecting above both documents) for the vendor using transaction F-44 system is giving an error message u201CThere is a mismatch between order type and GL accountu201D. System is prompting to correct the down payment entry, where I dint use any Cost centre, internal order.
Checked the Internal order profile, AUC settlement profile etc and no able to find an error message.
Can any one explain me why this error is coming and what need to be check in order to rectify it.
Regards
RS.

Hi It looks that the field status of the Order Type and GL Account field status is being mistmatching with each other. You can check the field status group given on GL Account and the fields status in Order Type.

Tax error while posting an invoice in SRM

We are using SRM 5.5 SP4, ECS and ECC 6.0. We are using vertex for tax caluculation and we configured the tax calculation to always occur in ECC.
One more important point is, client has decided to use invoicing in SRM. Now the problem is we ran in to so many tax related issues and we opened OSS messages for this but SAP did not help. Let me explain the problem in detail.
1) We used to get "Tax jurisdiction code could not be determined" error while creating shopping cart, but we implemented note 436760 and hardcoded a value and got rid of that error.
2) When we create a SC, the copy of PO is created in ECC and vertex is called for tax calculation and tax is calculated properly based on the tax hierarchy except when you use the Shipping Address (external), so when I used the delivery address other than plant, it should calculate based on that address but it was not doing that, its calculating based on the cost object's jurisdiction code. For this problem, we have implemented ME_ADDRESS BADI in ECC, but with this BADI, it is always taking delivery address's jurisdiction code, which is also wrong.
The tax jurisdiction determination should be from 1) Delivery address if its different from plant, else it should look in to the cost object, else storage location then plant.
So we implemented the above logic in that BADI and there is no problem with PO taxes.
3) When we create an invoice with reference to PO, the invoice verification program is always determining the tax jurisdiction code from plant even though the taxes on PO are calculated based on cost object, hence the IDOC is erroring out by saying there is a difference in tax.
So we implemented the user exit and used the same logic of tax determination and its fixed now.
4) Finally, we are trying to create invoices without PO's in SRM, here no tax calculation is happending in SRM, but when we try to post the invoice in to ECC, we are getting the following error
"SAX processing failed on input stream#SAX processing failed when attempting to add child element to parent. (parent element=com.vertexinc.tps.common.domain.LineItem, child element=com.vertexinc.tps.x.."
So I am not sure how to fix this, we are at the dead end now out of ideas, so trying to get some help from experts like you about looking at this problem in a different angle. Now there are a couple of questions I can ask you
1) Did we do something wrong by selecting R/3 as the tax calculation system, if not is it difficult to fix this error and move forward?
2) What if we need to change the design and start calculating the taxes in SRM by connecting SRM to Vertex, will there be any new challenges? and do you have any config doc for this? Also we are implementing this rollout for US, Canada and Mexico companies.
I would really appreciate if you can reply me with your valuable input. You can also email me if @ [email protected]
Thanks a lot,
Sreedhar

Hi
It's recommended to have the same Tax related configuration data replicated in SRM system from R/3 as well.
I don't recommeded you to go with Hard-coding of tax codes.
We have faced similar issues with Delivery address and we have to solve it using our custom logic inside the BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI and BBP_CREATE_PO_BACK BADIs.
Anyways, send the detailed business requirements to my mail which are already having with you. )
I will definitely help you out.
Please refer to following threads as well.
sales tax gurus
How to display country related tax codes in SRM
e-Invoice tax calculation.
Tax code T1 does not exist for jurisdiction code error in shopping basket
Drill down facility not working for Tax codes ....Urgent!!!!!
Tax Issue
Tax Calculation
Tax setting in Extended Classic Scenario
Withholding Tax in SRM5.0
IDOCS for Tax Information
Taxes in Bid Invitation
Hope this will help.
Please reward suitable points, incase it suits your requirements.
Regards
- Atul

Error while creating an Invoice in SRM

Hi All,
We are on SRM 7.0, ECC 6.0 (Classic scenario).
My SC has been approved and a PO has been created in ECC, I have also created a confirmation against this from SRM which resulted in a GR being created against the PO in ECC.
Now when I am creating an Invoice from SRM, I get the following error messages
1. Please enter tax amount
2. "Term of payment does not exist in target system".
Pl let me know where I need to maintain the payment terms in ECC and do I need to replicate it on SRM side?
Regards

Hi Sivakumar,
I am also facing same issue in my current project. Can you please tell me how you resolved the issue.
Thanks for advance helping to resolve the issue.
Regards,
Pijush

Blocked invoices for SRM PO

Dear All
I have requirement in that i need to create blocked invoices for SRM PO's . I have created a PO in SRM portal . Now the invoice need to be done at R3 side but i am not aware how i can create a invoice for the SRM PO's .
Any one help me on this .
Regards
Sunanda
Edited by: SMABAP on Dec 31, 2008 7:36 AM

Hi,
please check whether your PO has sent to R/3 system or not . if it is there in R/3 then please create a PO with MIRO transaction.....
Before creating the invoice please check whether vendor has GR based invoice vertification or not...
if you are not able to do then ask your FI team to do this....
Thanks
Ravi

Fatal error C1900: Il mismatch between 'P1' version '20080116' and 'P2' version '20070207'

Hi all,
I have a Team Foundation Build Agent that has Visual Studio Team System 2008 Test Edition installed. One of the solutions that I compile with that Build Agent gives me the following errors:
VCBUILD : fatal error C1047: The object or library file '.\bin\Release\main.obj' was created with an older compiler than other objects; rebuild old objects and libraries
LINK : fatal error LNK1257: code generation failed
VCBUILD : fatal error C1900: Il mismatch between 'P1' version '20080116' and 'P2' version '20070207'
LINK : fatal error LNK1257: code generation failed
I've searched online and found that other people have experienced the same problem:
http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/intel-c-compiler/topic/62516/
http://nuicode.com/issues/266
In the second posting one states "I had the same Error! After installing Service Pack1 for VS2008 it worked!". Thats great for him but I don't see any such update for the Test Edition of Visual Studio Team System 2008 - Test Edition.
What can I do to get rid of that problem?
Thanks!

Hello ACKH
I once handled a similar case in newsgroups. That case exhibit a almost same symptom. Please check out my summary below:
Problem
In that case, the customer has a DLL project that you had built on a machine where VS 2008 SP1 was installed. You then attempted to rebuild that project on a machine without SP1, and got a fatal compiler error C1900 “IL mismatch between ‘P1’ version ‘20080116’ and ‘P2’ version ‘20070207’”, and then LNK1257 “Code generation failed”. He found that rebuilding your static library alleviated the errors, but cannot accept this as a workaround because your clients will not have the ability to rebuild the libraries you distribute before they use them.
Cause
You had built the static library with the /GL (Whole Program Optimization) compiler switch, which requires Link Time Code Generation (/LTCG) when the static library is subsequently linked. These features require that all linked modules be built by the same version of the compiler. In fact, if precompiled headers are used, the same machine must build and link all the involved object code. Therefore, it is highly recommended that static libraries not be built with the /GL switch, since their intended use is quite frequently to support reuse by others.
Solution
You rebuilt the static library on your VS2008 SP1 machine without the /GL switch, and you no longer encounter this problem.
Please let me know if this info is helpful to you or not.
Regards,
Jialiang Ge
MSDN Subscriber Support in Forum
If you have any feedback of our support, please contact [email protected]
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help.
Welcome to the All-In-One Code Framework! If you have any feedback, please tell us.

Unable to create confirmation/invoice in SRM,Classic Scenario

Hi Guru's,
I am unable to create Confirmation/Invoice in the Portal, attached the screen shot of the error
its is the problem with the ADRC table, there is no entry in the table for the BP.
I tried to access the table via SM30 to add the entry in ADRC manually, I get a message table maintenance not defined
Regards,
Kiran

Hi Kiran,
Could you please also advise whether all the users are not able to create the confirmation in portal. Or if there is any specific user who is not able to do that?
And I also request you to advise whether you going to do the invoice in SRM portal in classic scenario?
Best Regards,
Bharathi

SSRS 2012 ERROR [IM014] [Microsoft][ODBC Driver Manager] The specified DSN contains an architecture mismatch between the Driver and Application

I have a SSRS installation, I have deployed my connections to, but they fail with title message. The drivers and ODBC on the box are setup and work fine with 32 bit ODBC conn manager.
When I run or configure my connections on the site, via the browser, I get errors connecting.
I tried to find which app pool http://server/ReportServer application used, but I am not finding that, so my first ?
How do I find in IIS what app pool SSRS application is using?
I have 2008 server, running SQL 2012 V.S. 2010 and I think I need to enable my app pool to use 32 bit, but cannot figure out which one it uses? I see default set to 32 bit = true, which I thought would be it.
Can I set my SSRS project to use x86, platform? Like I did with SSIS?
If so, how? SSRS and SQL 2012 somewhat new for me. Thanks
Developer MS Reporting Services

Hi DCady,
To manage a data source that connects to a 32-bit driver under 64-bit platform, we use C:\Windows\SysWOW64\odbcad32.exe. To manage a data source that connects to a 64-bit driver, we use C:\Windows\System32\odbcad32.exe.
Generally, if we use the 64-bit odbcad32.exe (C:\Windows\System32\odbcad32.exe) to configure or remove a DSN that connects to a 32-bit driver, for example, Driver do Microsoft Access (*.mdb), we will receive the following error message:
The specified DSN contains an architecture mismatch between the Driver and Application
To resolve this error, we need to use the 32-bit odbcad32.exe (C:\Windows\SysWOW64\odbacad32.exe) to configure or remove the DSN.
Besides, please make sure there are no DSN using the same name in both 64-bit and 32-bit ODBC Data Source Administrator.
Reference:
Managing Data Sources
Regards,
Mike Yin
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here
Mike Yin
TechNet Community Support

Data mismatch between TABLE and Std. Extract str. (AFPO & 2LIS_04_P_MATNR)

Hi,
I am getting data mismatch in ECC standard table and ECC standard extract structure. Please help me.
I am using 2LIS_04_P_P_MATNR data source (standard extract structure).
I have following data in ECC Table (AFPO - Order Item).
AUFNR (Order Number) --> 4000460
PGMNG (Total planned quantity) --> 0
PSMNG (ORDER QTY) --> 2000
Extract Structure is showing following data.
AUFNR (Order Number) --> 4000460
PGMNG (Total planned quantity) --> 2000 (It should be zero)
PSMNG (ORDER QTY) --> 2000
I have checked with many other order numbers. The extract structure in RSA3 is showing correct values only if PGMNG is non-zero values. If PGMNG is zero, then it is automatically assigning PSMNG value.
Is this common? I want to display correct values for PGMNG from AFPO Table. Why this mismatch between table data and extract data. I have done all required steps refreshing data (deleting setup tables, filling set up tables etc.).
pls suggest. Poinsts will be assigned to every useful answer.
Thanks in advance.

Hi Avneet,
I have a similar problem where in AFPO shows value 1000 in PSMNG field and 1200 in RSA3 for extractor 2LIS_04_P_MATNR.
I have found that the standard feature of the extractor extracts the data at the time of release of process order. If the process order is changed after the release then the extractor will not picup the chagne.
Ex: AFPO value 1000 ---BI Value 1000
Now released in ECC
AFPO value 1000 ---BI Value 1000
In ECC value changed to 1500 after the release. BI will not pickup the change.
Extractor is pulling the data from MCAFPOV table. You can check the values, there it matches with RSA3 values.
I was just going thru forums for the solution. After i found the solution. I am just updating it.
Hope it helps you.
Thaks
Srikanth

Posting date filed not available to modify in invoices from SRM

Hi there.
When we try to create an invoice from SRM ITS, the field posting date it is as displayed field, we can not populate it with another date. The value of this field is always the actual date.
Is it possible to activate this field in order to modify the content?
Thanks and regards.
Raúl.

Hi All-
Though this is claimed to be standard in SRM 5.0 in the release notes, the Posting Date field is not displayed in the SRM Invoice Basic data screens or is not editable rather. We had the same issue and SAP created an OSS note for us.
The OSS Note number is OSS note 1082248.
Pls assign points for usefull answers !!
Sundeep

Output mismatch between BEx query output and WebI Report output

Hi All,
I have a BEx query in which there are only characteristics placed in rows.
There are combinations of the values of the characteristics giving different records in the query output.
Date is one of the characterisctics in the query output.
There is an output mismatch between the query output and the WebI report output in the following case:
When there are 'Not Assigned' or '#' or blank values, there are additional entries(rows) in the WebI report, giving repeating or wrong entries in the Date field. This is incorrect data.
Is this because of the 'Not Assigned' or '#' or blank values of the Characteristics or is there any other reason?
How do I fix this?
Please helo me with this.
Thanks and Regards,
Srilakshmi B

Hi Rajesh,
I need to verify the WebI report output for records with # and 'Not assigned' values for the cHracteristics in the report.
So I cannot check the WebI report by hiding the # or Not assigned values.
The problem is that in the Query output the records are like these shown below:
Char1                    CHar2                          CHar3                       Date field
A                             B                                 C                                Date1
#(Not assgined)      #(Not assgined)      #(Not assgined)             No value
Where as the WebI report output is as below:
Char1                    CHar2                          CHar3                       Date field
A                             B                                 C                                Date1
#(Not assgined)      #(Not assgined)      #(Not assgined)            Date1
As shown here, there are wrong/repeating entries for the Date field in the WebI report output.
Please check this and let me know what could be the issue and how do I fix it.
Thanks and Regards,
Srilakshmi B

Mismatch between IAK file and module

Is there any way to programatically check that the configuration of the modules in the
IAK-file matches the hardware configuration of the actual modules ?
We see, especially for the old FieldPoint modules (non Compact), that
a seldom time, it pops up an error that is caused by a mismatch between these two settings,
even though nothing has been changed by the users.
PS: I am not using the modules as Real-time modules.
Martin

Hi Vickey,
Try to generate XSD for your standard IDoc using we60.
Define it in your console.
Refer https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/107fabbb-b8ca-2b10-04b5-8f34729ef228
Hope it helps.
Thanks,
Minaz

Mismatch between the MD04 and VL10 tcodes.

Hello Gurus,
There is a Mismatch between the MD04 and VL10 tcodes. We can see an entry in the VL10 transaction which we couldn't find in the MD04. Please note that there is no dschedule line for that date in the LU aggrement. Kindly advice.

can be an error in in the delivery index.
run SDRQCR21 report?
And see if the record appears in MD04 or vanishes from VL10

Mismatch between availability and marker

I have run the following command:
/repvfy -detail -fix -pwd password
and am seeing a section called "Mismatch between availabiltiy and marker". What does this mean? I know there is a bug out from Note: 735957 against 10.2.04 and that patch 6951116 is available. I also know this bug is fixed in 10.2.0.5. But I don't know what exactly this section is telling me. Here is the output I am seeing:
6. Mismatches between availability and marker
TARGET_GUID TARGET_NAME TARGET_TYPE MARKER_AVAIL_STATUS MARKER_TIME CURRENT_STATUS START_TIME
9CB8EE19415C3C6B55954BF3346C1106 ssan-Internal Concurrent Manager oracle_apps_icm 6 09-JUN-2009 10:41:50 1 28-MAY-2009 14:25:22
1B21AAEF5AC63DD44FE339B7852EA1EE ssan-Report Server_ssan_devstar2 oracle_apps_reports 6 09-JUN-2009 10:41:50 1 28-MAY-2009 14:25:13
F5EAD749526EC1116A70157771E3D011 ssan-Oracle Workflow Agent Listener oracle_apps_wfalsnr 6 09-JUN-2009 10:41:50 1 28-MAY-2009 14:25:29
CD32714673BC508CDBF85BF191A5A1B7 ssan-Workflow Background Engine oracle_apps_wfbg 6 09-JUN-2009 10:41:50 1 28-MAY-2009 14:25:26
FADA1D6BF4DFD0E8AA1739A6666BA210 SSAN oracle_database 6 09-JUN-2009 10:41:50 1 28-MAY-2009 14:25:40
0BE2ACE2EDC7271744DA1A249E30C9A5 APPS_ssan oracle_listener 6 09-JUN-2009 10:41:50 1 28-MAY-2009 14:25:12
89D241EEEF24821E30AD66741BC3D433 devstar2.rtd-denver.com oracle_listener 6 09-JUN-2009 10:41:50 1 28-MAY-2009 14:25:20
F40BAF501645A5957A498E7A270AEA47 ssan-Apps Listener_ssan_devstar2 oracle_listener 6 09-JUN-2009 10:41:50 1 28-MAY-2009 14:25:28
8 rows selected.

Various provision like Freight, transport etc .
these should go to separate GL accounts. if you give wrong account assignment value will be passed to GRIR. then difference will happen
sunoj

IDoc structure mismatch between SAP R/3 and PI

Hi,
There is an interface in PI which receives IDoc from SAP R/3 system. I have been facing an issue of IDoc structure mismatch (in terms of data present in it) between SAP R/3 and when PI receives the IDoc.
To be more precise,
In SAP R/3 system, the value ABC is present in the field DOCNUM in the IDoc.
But when the PI receives the same IDoc from SAP R/3 (as seen in Integration Engine), the value ABC is present in a different field and the DOCNUM field is empty.
<DOCNUM></DOCNUM>
<ARCKEY>ABC</ARCKEY>
The first step towards resolution was to delete and reimport the IDoc metadata from SAP R/3 in PI system using IDX2, which did not help in this case.
Could anyone please help in resolving the field mismatch between the IDoc triggered from SAP R/3 and the IDoc received by PI.
Regards,
Prajeet

Hi Prajeet,
it's long ago but your question has not been finally solved, so let me try to give you an answer. We are facing the same problem after patching our PI.
I think the reason for the different behaviour is related to SAP note 1233908, where SAP has changed the IDoc adapter.
https://service.sap.com/sap/support/notes/1233908
Regards,
Lars

Invoicing in SRM 5.0 - Mismatch between categories

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for