IPSec pass-through in IOS router

Is there any command need to enable IPSec pass-through on 2800 router?

Assuming there are no ACLs on the interfaces, no. If there are ACL's on the interface(s) then you will need to allow it through via the ACL.
HTH and please rate.

Similar Messages

  • IPSEC Pass through

    Does the airport extreme base support ipsec pass-through for the Cisco VPN client?
    ie Can I create a VPN from a workstation connected to the base?
    Thanks.

    Hello dweldon. Welcome to the Apple Discussions!
    Try the following...
    802.11n AirPort Extreme Base Station (AEBSn) – Cisco VPN Setup
    - Run the Admin Utility
    - Click on Internet
    - Click on DHCP
    - Add a DHCP reservation for the IP address that is assigned to the machine you are connecting via VPN
    - Click on NAT
    - Check the option Enable Default Host At and enter the IP Address that you made a reservation for in the previous step.
    - Click on Advanced (Main menu at top)
    - Click on Ports
    - Click the add button (bottom left)
    - Service=DO NOT CHANGE
    - Public UDP Port(s) = 1723,1701
    - Public TCP Port(s) = BLANK
    - Private IP address = Use address from Step 4
    - Private UDP Port(s) = 1723,1701
    - Private TCP Port(s) = BLANK
    - Click Continue
    - Give your setup a name, like Cisco VPN (call it what you want)
    - Click DONE
    - Click UPDATE

  • RV042G cannot support more than 2-3 IPSec Pass through connections

    Hi,
    I'm trying to figure out what the max number of IPSec VPN pass through connections the RV042G can handle.  We bought an RV042G router to replace our old RV042 box which was running into connection limitations.  There are approximately 15 people in the office and anywhere from 5-8 of them need to vpn to a single client site.   There seems to be an issue with UPNP where it creates the proper port forwarding but doesn't associate it with an internal IP address.  Giving each workstation a static internal IP doesn't solve this issue.  The remote site we are connecting to does have NAT-T turned on.  What ends up happening is that after a while, users cannot vpn.  Sometimes it happens with fewer than three users.  Clearing the UPNP and rebooting the router helps but eventually if you connect and disconnect, a few times, you're hosed.   The UPNP doesn't release the setting it makes in a timely fashion.  Is there any way to fix this besides turning off UPNP which we need for other software to work?

    Lenovo support (for me in Canada at least) is based in Atlanta, so I'm surprised you found a tech with bad English...
    Your problems sound like windows problems, not hardware problems -- are you running XP or Windows7? If you google based on your OS, there are threads to be found on slowing down the start menu behaviors.

  • IPSec Pass Through on ASA

    I have a third party firewall behind a Cisco ASA. The Cisco ASA is doing PAT as there are no other IP addresses available. The third party firewall is attempting to build an IPSec tunnel to another firewall. The IPSec tunnel is not coming up. When I do a capture on the Cisco ASA firewall I see traffic hit the inside interface and leave the outside interface. I then see the reply traffic return and hit the outside interface of my Cisco ASA but it is not being allowed to pass through to the inside interface.I have enabled NAT-T on the thrid party firewall but it still does not get the reply traffic becuase it gets stopped at the Cisco ASA.
    Any thoughts?

    Is your third party FW attached directly to your ASA? If not, do you have a route to that device on your ASA?
    Please perform a packet-tracer to see why the return traffic is not reaching the third party FW..
    packet-tracer input outside udp 500 500 detail
    If the packet-tracer shows traffic going through successfully, perhaps it is your third party FW that is blocking the traffic?
    Please reply with packet-tracer results.
    Kind Regards,
    Kevin
    **Please remember to rate helpful posts as well as mark the question as 'answered' once your issue is resolved. This will help others to find your solution faster.

  • Tracing a route passing through ASA

    Hi Everyone,
    Need help on tracing a route IP 192.168.27.0  that is passing through ASA
    i did sh route on ASA
    S    192.168.27.0 255.255.255.0 [1/0] via 192.168.101.14, Xnet
    so this means that this ASA is learning this route statically through int Xnet  right ?
    when i do sh int on ASA  it shows Xnet as interface.
    what should be my next step?
    also i am able to ping this IP from ASA  but whne i do sh arp it does not show this IP 192.168.27.251 and mac address
    Thanks
    Mahesh
    Message was edited by: mahesh parmar

    So I presume you have ASA5550 or you have bought addiotional 4 GigabitEthernet module.
    When you look at the ASA from the side where the physical ports are
    The usual ports (without the module) should be in the Right side
    The modules ports should be on the Left side
    The module should contain 8 ports
    4 Ports are for SFP slots (usually for fiber connections)
    4 Ports are for basic Ethernet connectivity
    The configuration should have some line "media-type" which defines which type is used "rj45" of "sfp"
    rj45 for Ethernet
    sfp for SFP module
    So GigabitEthernet 1/2 port should be to my understanding either the Third Ethernet or Third SFP port of the module depending on the above port configuration mentioned (media-type rj45/sfp)
    The ports GigabitEthernet0/0 - x are the ports that are in every ASA, Ports GigabitEthernet1/0 - x are the expansion modules ports
    Hope this helps. Hopefully I remembered that right.
    - Jouni

  • L2TP/IPSec on IOS router

    The following topic describes how to do L2TP/IPSec on Windows 8.
    https://supportforums.cisco.com/document/9878401/l2tp-over-ipsec-cisco-ios-router-using-windows-8
    However, I am trying to use the same template for Chrome OS clients and it does not work. Has it ever been set up successfully? Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
    Thank you,
    Aram.

    Randy, I understand now!
    What I would do in this case is couple of things, but this still needs some minor configuration on the router, it depends on the router managed provider but.. you should be able to ask the provider know that you want to get syslog traps from the router to your syslog server, and they should be able to provide this to you and they should provide that, after all, you are paying for services even though is a managed router by provider.
    On the router thye would configure a secondary logging server.
    e.i
    say your syslog server is 20.20.20.20
    router(config)#logging 20.20.20.20
    router(config)#logging trap informational
    the above informational is facility #6 out of the 7 levels of facility, 0 being emergencies 1 alerts 2 critical and so on..I believe with this facility# you will see tunnel info on the syslog.
    additionally, on the access-lists pertaining to the L2L Ipsec tunnel add the keyword log at the end of each of its access-list, with the keywork log the router will send traps pertaining to the access-list to your syslog thus providing you that the connection is stablihed or not.
    Rgds
    -Jorge

  • Back To My Mac to a Time Capsule through a 3Com Router not working

    I have a Mac Book Pro (10.5.7), Time Capsule (7.4.1), 3Com Office Connect Wireless Router (3CRWDR101A-75), a trial subscription to Mobile Me and a 2.5G iPhone (2.2.1).
    I have been unable to get BTTM from my Mac on a remote wireless connection to my Time Capsule working - hence this post.
    The set up of the Time Capsule was quite straightforward (as I would have expected from Apple) and I quickly established local and remote iCal / Address Book sync between my Mac, www.me.com and my iPhone. I have enabled and am the 2.4 and 5GHz bands on the Time Capsule and the wireless air interface on the 3Com router has been turned off. All of internet and email services on my Mac work well locally and Time Machine work. So far so good.
    However, I am unable to 'see' my Time Capsule in Finder from any WiFi network that is not my home network. When at home I have full access to Time Capsule's disk.
    My 3Com Office Router 3CRWDR101A-75 is not on the list of supported routers (nor is any other 3Com Router) but it does provide UPnP and NAT as required according to Mobile Sync notes including http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1552 and http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1552. Despite my best efforts, I have been unable to find out from Apple's MobileMe support if there are any minimum requirements for any router to work with Back To My Mac so can't check to see if my 3Com router will ever work with BTTM or not.
    Does anyone have any similar experience with setting up a 3Com Office Connect router to work with Back to My Mac?
    Do I need to check / Can I check if my Time Capsule has been registered with the Mobile Me servers?
    Do I need to enable any specific ports on my 3Com Office Connect router?
    Basic settings:
    Time Capsule: green light - all OK
    AirPort Utility>Internet: Connection Sharing: Off (Bridge Mode)
    AirPort Utility>Advanced>Mobile me: account set up
    AirPort Utility>Advanced>IPv6: IPv6 mode = Node, at the request of Apple Mobile Me support
    System Preferences>Mobile Me>BackToMy Mac: On (green light).
    3Com Office Connect Router: DCHP server: On
    3Com Office Connect Router: Firewall level: High (default)
    3Com Office Connect Router: Disable NAT: Off (default)
    3Com Office Connect Router: Enable Universal Plug & Play: On
    3Com Office Connect Router: Enable IPSEC-NAT pass through: ON, at the request of Apple Mobile me support
    Com Office Connect Router: DMZ: enable 1-to-1 NAT: Off (default)
    Any ideas?
    Thanks.

    Quick update on troubleshooting BTTM (or rather Back To My Time Capsule)...
    Surprising;y, no 3Com products listed in http://support.apple.com/kb/TS1304. 3Com tech support stated that no OfficeConnect products have been qualified against BTTM and my specific router does not support IPv6 over IPv4 encapsulation.
    MobileMe support were not able to help, citing the fact that I had an unsupported router.
    I have made no change to my modem/router config since first posted but since an upgrade of my TC to 7.4.2 I have been able to use BTTM with my TC (bridge mode) and my OfficeConnect modem/router (802.11b WiFi disabled).
    I have made limited testing from other remote locations from my MBP and also proved that it worked over a 3G/UMTS connection on the UK's 02 network also
    MobileMe still reporting uPnP / NAT problem on my MBP when working remotely though.
    http://discussions.apple.com/message.jspa?messageID=9733258 confirms that this has been solved and, apart from the anomalous Mobileme status message, I can agree.
    Good news so now do not need to swap out my 3Com router. Also shows that this 3Com product does meet BTTM connectivity requirements.
    Message was edited by: Elise49
    Message was edited by: Elise49

  • Sip passing through nat but rtp is not - no audio

    Sip passing through nat but rtp is not
    I'm looking at traffic leaving my router with a sniffer. I see SIP traffic but I do not see RTP traffic.  The phones ring on both sides but I do not get any audio.
    interface f0/0.100
    ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0
    ip nat outside
    ip nat pool VoIP 192.168.10.1  192.168.10.1 prefix-length 24
    ip nat inside source route-map VoIP pool VoIP overload
    ip nat inside source static tcp 10.1.1.2 49201 192.168.10.54 49201 extendable
    access-list 1 permit ip host 10.1.1.2 any
    route-map VoIP permit 10
    match ip address 1
    match interface  f0/0.100
    set interface  f0/0.100

    Hello,
    You can enable "ip nat service sip" or "ip nat service h323" and "ip nat
    service h225" commands. As per the documentation, they are enabled by
    default. In the latest IOS there is a new feature added to Cisco IOS that
    ensures that even RTP packets get translated to one of the allowed ports as
    specified by the RFC. The command to enable the feature is "ip nat service
    allow-sip-even-rtp-ports"
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/iosswrel/ps6537/ps6586/ps6640/pro
    d_white_paper0900aecd80597bc7.html
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    NT

  • SRP547W Multiple IPSec policies through single IKE policy

    I am trying to create a VPN between an SRP547W and a Cisco IOS router, in this case a UC540.I am running firmware 1.2.4 (003) Jan 11 2012
    Now I can do this with an SRP527W and many other routers successfully. Including other IOS routers 1801, 1941 etc.
    The issue I have is on the SRP547W I cannot create more than one IPSec Policy through a single IKE policy. I require this to route multiple vlans to our remote site.
    When I try to add an additional IPSec Policy I am give the error "IKE policy has been used by other IPSec policy"
    This is possible to do on the SRP527W with latest firmware. I have tried rolling back to earlier firmware but instead I am given an error about overlap.
    Latest release note for this firmware suggest this issue was already resolved.
    Any help much appreciated.

    Hello Matthew,
    Sorry to hear you are having difficulty.
    I was able to test this on firmware 1.02.01 and get the overlap error that you mention. I resolved it by choosing "IP address & subnet mask" in the local selection field. When I used "IP Address" I received the same error unless I changed the IP address to something (other that the one used in the first policy) under the local traffic selection then it allowed a succesful submission. The remote traffic selector or ip address doesn't not have any bearing on the error.
    Are you using the same local IP address for each IPSec policy and if you are, try changing the local IP selector to IP+Subnet mask. Also as a reminder, the number of IPSec policies is based on bandwidth limitations and most often no more that 2 site-to-site tunnels can connect at a single time.
    Please let me know if this helps.
    Best regards,
    Wesley S.
    Cisco SBSC

  • Modem Pass through to remote PBX

    Dear All,
    I would like to use the cisco router 3640 (with T1 card) and cisco 2621 (with 2 x FXS card) to simulate the network & pstn environment to test the modem pass through, here is the detail connection:
    Analog Phone (Ext: 451660) <--> [FXS] Cisco Router 2621 <---- LAN ----> Router 3640 [T1] <--> [T1] PBX (Panasonic) <--> Analog Phone (Ext: 454820, Modem)
    The dial-peer on the router 2621 & 3640 is working as I can call in/out from PBX analog phone, and I was success to connect the PC (with modem port, and use the hyperterminal, atdt454820) from Outside PC (with modem port, Ext: 451660).
    But I was fail to dial-out from PBX analog phone (454820) to 451660.
    From Cisco router 2600:
    dial-peer voice 45166 voip
    destination-pattern 45166.
    modem passthrough nse codec g711ulaw redundancy
    session target ipv4:192.168.0.60 (Router 3640)
    From Cisco router 3640
    dial-peer voice 454820 voip
    destination-pattern 454820
    modem passthrough nse codec g711ulaw redundancy
    session target ipv4:192.168.0.44 (Router 2600)
    Here is the link I try to follow to do:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_1t/12_1t3/feature/guide/dtmodptr.html
    I would like to know if there is any miss-configure or how can I troubleshoot (to find out the cause) which I cannot connect from PBX' PC.
    Thanks!

    Note that anytime a call traverses a voice gateway, we match *two* dial-peers, not one.  We match one inbound, and one outbound.  In your scenario, if the FXS side originates the call, it would be:
    fxs(inbound pots)router(outbound voip)----LAN-----(inbound voip)router(outbound pots)---T1
    The algorithm for how this works is documented in this link.  I recommend having a few reads over this:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk90/technologies_tech_note09186a008010fed1.shtml
    If you can get these debugs, I can take a deeper look into the failure:
    debug voip ccapi inout
    debug isdn q931
    debug vpm sig
    debug h225 asn1
    debug h245 asn1
    Collect these in the following manner:
    Router(config)# service sequence
    Router(config)# service timestamps debug datetime msec
    Router(config)# logging buffered 10000000 7
    Router(config)# no logging con
    Router(config)# no logging mon
    Router(config)# voice iec syslog
    Router# term len 0
    Router# sh logg
    Also send the full configs of both gateways.
    -Steve

  • PIX - IOS Router Redundancy

    PIX at remote, Dual Interface/Dual ISP IOS Router at core.
    Is there a way to have an IPSEC Tunnel fromt he PIX to the Dual ISP Router at the core?
    Can't get the PIX to pass traffic over the second IPSEC Tunnel when one ISP/Interface goes down at the IOS Router.
    Help!
    Thanks,
    Bob

    PIX-501 at the remote
    Cisco1721 with Dual ISP feeds at Central site.
    I want two tunnels from the PIX to the Cisco1721.
    One ISP goes down, tarffic goes over the second tunnel.
    Thanks,
    Bob

  • SSLVPN with iPhone Anyconnect and Cisco IOS Router, Certificate Authentication failed

    Hello,
    i have a problem regarding the authentication with a certificate from the iPhone Anyconnect 2.5 Client to a 1802 Cisco Router.
    Cisco 1802 Router:
    Cisco IOS Software, C180X Software (C180X-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 15.1(1)T, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
    First i configured SSLVPN with username and password, in this configuration the Anyconnect Client of my iPhone works.
    then i enrolled a certificate from my Windows 2008 R2 CA to the Router with the Attributes: Server Authentication and IPSEC
    and i enrolled a certificate for my iPhone with Client Authentication and IPSEC
    after a bunch of time ( i realy could not find a really good documentation on how to do this) i got it done, in the webvpn context configuration i made this changes here:
    no aaa authentication list default
    authentication certificate
    ca trustpoint CA
    as the "SSL VPN Configuration Guide, Cisco IOS Release 15.1M&T" says: if i want only certificate authentication i had to user the "authentication certificate" command and thats it.
    as i look into the debugs it seems to me that the Router accepts the certificate of the iPhone, but then i receive a window on the iphone that wants an additional username and password authentication, and no matter what i enter there's always the same dialog coming back..
    any ideas what the problem could be???
    here is the configuration:
    webvpn gateway WEBVPN_GW_OFFICE2
    ip interface Dialer0 port 1444
    ssl trustpoint CA
    inservice
    webvpn install svc flash:/webvpn/sslclient-win-1.1.4.179.pkg sequence 1
    webvpn install svc flash:/webvpn/anyconnect-win-3.0.4235-k9.pkg sequence 2
    webvpn install svc flash:/webvpn/anyconnect-dart-win-2.5.3055-k9.pkg sequence 3
    webvpn context WEBVPN_CONTEXT2
    secondary-color white
    title-color #669999
    text-color black
    ssl authenticate verify all
    policy group WEBVPN_POLICY2
       functions svc-enabled
       mask-urls
       svc address-pool "SSLVPN_OFFICE1"
       svc default-domain "domain.internal"
       svc keep-client-installed
       svc split include 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0
       svc dns-server primary 192.168.53.33
       svc dns-server secondary 192.168.53.35
    virtual-template 3
    default-group-policy WEBVPN_POLICY2
    gateway WEBVPN_GW_OFFICE2
    authentication certificate
    ca trustpoint CA
    inservice
    here is the debug:
    OfficeRouter1# PASSING appctx is [0x89FAFFCC]
    Nov 19 22:39:53.507: WV: sslvpn process rcvd context queue event
    Nov 19 22:39:53.507: WV: sslvpn process rcvd context queue event
    Nov 19 22:39:53.607: WV: sslvpn process rcvd context queue event
    Nov 19 22:39:53.607: WV: Entering APPL with Context: 0x86529380,
          Data buffer(buffer: 0x86543A40, data: 0x15A07AB8, len: 469,
          offset: 0, domain: 0)
    Nov 19 22:39:53.607: WV: http request: / with no cookie
    Nov 19 22:39:53.607: WV: validated_tp : CA cert_username :  matched_ctx :
    Nov 19 22:39:53.607: WV: Received appinfo
    validated_tp : CA, matched_ctx : ,cert_username :
    Nov 19 22:39:53.607: WV: Trustpoint match successful
    Nov 19 22:39:53.607: WV: Extracted username:  pass: ?
    Nov 19 22:39:53.607: WV: Client side Chunk data written..
    buffer=0x86543640 total_len=661 bytes=661 tcb=0x8811FE60
    Nov 19 22:39:53.607: WV: Appl. processing Failed : 2
    Nov 19 22:39:53.607: WV: sslvpn process rcvd context queue event
    BueroRouter1# PASSING appctx is [0x89FAEEC4]
    Nov 19 22:40:24.028: WV: sslvpn process rcvd context queue event
    Nov 19 22:40:24.032: WV: sslvpn process rcvd context queue event
    Nov 19 22:40:24.132: WV: sslvpn process rcvd context queue event
    Nov 19 22:40:24.132: WV: Entering APPL with Context: 0x86529380,
          Data buffer(buffer: 0x86543A40, data: 0x160C4038, len: 469,
          offset: 0, domain: 0)
    Nov 19 22:40:24.132: WV: http request: / with no cookie
    Nov 19 22:40:24.132: WV: validated_tp : CA cert_username :  matched_ctx :
    Nov 19 22:40:24.132: WV: Received appinfo
    validated_tp : CA, matched_ctx : ,cert_username :
    Nov 19 22:40:24.132: WV: Trustpoint match successful
    Nov 19 22:40:24.132: WV: Extracted username:  pass: ?
    Nov 19 22:40:24.132: WV: Client side Chunk data written..
    buffer=0x86543640 total_len=661 bytes=661 tcb=0x88D11EEC
    Nov 19 22:40:24.136: WV: Appl. processing Failed : 2
    Nov 19 22:40:24.136: WV: sslvpn process rcvd context queue event
    Nov 19 22:40:39.764: WV: sslvpn process rcvd context queue event
    Nov 19 22:40:39.880: WV: sslvpn process rcvd context queue event
    Nov 19 22:40:39.892: WV: sslvpn process rcvd context queue event
    Nov 19 22:40:39.892: WV: Entering APPL with Context: 0x86529380,
          Data buffer(buffer: 0x86543A40, data: 0x1616FD38, len: 610,
          offset: 0, domain: 0)
    Nov 19 22:40:39.892: WV: http request: /webvpn.html with domain cookie
    Nov 19 22:40:39.892: WV: validated_tp :  cert_username :  matched_ctx :
    Nov 19 22:40:39.892: WV: Received appinfo
    validated_tp : CA, matched_ctx : ,cert_username :
    Nov 19 22:40:39.892: WV: Trustpoint match successful
    Nov 19 22:40:39.892: WV: Client side Chunk data written..
    buffer=0x86543640 total_len=607 bytes=607 tcb=0x88D11EEC
    Nov 19 22:40:39.892: WV: Appl. processing Failed : 2
    Nov 19 22:40:39.892: WV: sslvpn process rcvd context queue event

    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps8411/products_qanda_item09186a00809aec31.shtml
    HI,
    Refer to
    AnyConnect VPN Client FAQ
    Q. Is it possible to connect the iPad, iPod, or iPhone AnyConnect VPN Client to a Cisco IOS router?
    A. No. It is not possible to connect  the iPad, iPod, or iPhone AnyConnect VPN Client to a Cisco IOS router.  AnyConnect on iPad/iPhone can connect only to an ASA that runs version  8.0(3).1 or later. Cisco IOS is not supported by the AnyConnect VPN  Client for Apple iOS. For more information, refer to the Security Appliances and Software Supported section of the Release Notes for Cisco AnyConnect Secure Mobility Client 2.4, Apple iOS 4.2 and 4.3.

  • Cisco ASA 5505 L2TP Pass through

    I am having trouble with L2TP pass through on an ASA 5505 device.
    L2TP server: OSX 10.6
    I can connect with any OSX system and it works fine straight away.
    When connecting with a windows computer I get a 789 error.  "Error 789: The L2TP connection attempt failed because the security layer encountere a processing error during the initial negotiations with the remote computer."
    I did not setup or configure the device to start with and apart from this issue its working fine so I am hessitant at trying to just mess around too much to try and find the problem.
    I am using the ASDM 6.4 to manage the device.
    Ports look to be forwarded correctly; 1701, 4500 & 500 UDP.
    Im just looking for other common issues?
    Rob

    Below is the commands you wanted.
    Where you see: IPNOTWHATIWASEXPECTING
    This is an IP I dont know. possible and old IP address.
    and
    default-domain value domain-notcorrect.local
    This is an old domain from years ago.
    Result of the command: "show run crypto"
    crypto ipsec transform-set aes-sha esp-aes esp-sha-hmac
    crypto ipsec transform-set aes-192-sha esp-aes-192 esp-sha-hmac
    crypto ipsec transform-set aes-256-sha esp-aes-256 esp-sha-hmac
    crypto ipsec transform-set 3des-sha esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
    crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA esp-aes esp-sha-hmac
    crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-128-MD5 esp-aes esp-md5-hmac
    crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-192-SHA esp-aes-192 esp-sha-hmac
    crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-192-MD5 esp-aes-192 esp-md5-hmac
    crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA esp-aes-256 esp-sha-hmac
    crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-256-MD5 esp-aes-256 esp-md5-hmac
    crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA esp-3des esp-sha-hmac
    crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-3DES-MD5 esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
    crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-SHA esp-des esp-sha-hmac
    crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-MD5 esp-des esp-md5-hmac
    crypto ipsec transform-set transform-amzn esp-aes esp-sha-hmac
    crypto ipsec security-association lifetime seconds 28800
    crypto ipsec security-association lifetime kilobytes 4608000
    crypto dynamic-map map-dynamic 1 set pfs group5
    crypto dynamic-map map-dynamic 1 set transform-set aes-256-sha aes-192-sha aes-sha 3des-sha
    crypto dynamic-map map-dynamic 2 set pfs
    crypto dynamic-map map-dynamic 2 set transform-set aes-256-sha aes-192-sha aes-sha 3des-sha
    crypto dynamic-map map-dynamic 3 set pfs
    crypto dynamic-map map-dynamic 3 set transform-set aes-256-sha aes-192-sha aes-sha 3des-sha
    crypto dynamic-map map-dynamic 4 set transform-set aes-256-sha aes-192-sha aes-sha 3des-sha
    crypto map outside_map 1 match address outside_1_cryptomap
    crypto map outside_map 1 set peer IPNOTWHATIWASEXPECTING3
    crypto map outside_map 1 set transform-set ESP-DES-SHA
    crypto map outside_map 2 match address acl-amzn
    crypto map outside_map 2 set pfs
    crypto map outside_map 2 set peer IPNOTWHATIWASEXPECTING IPNOTWHATIWASEXPECTING
    crypto map outside_map 2 set transform-set transform-amzn
    crypto map outside_map 255 ipsec-isakmp dynamic map-dynamic
    crypto map outside_map interface outside
    crypto isakmp identity address
    crypto isakmp enable outside
    crypto isakmp policy 1
    authentication pre-share
    encryption aes-256
    hash sha
    group 5
    lifetime 86400
    crypto isakmp policy 2
    authentication pre-share
    encryption aes-256
    hash sha
    group 2
    lifetime 86400
    crypto isakmp policy 3
    authentication pre-share
    encryption aes-256
    hash sha
    group 1
    lifetime 86400
    crypto isakmp policy 11
    authentication pre-share
    encryption aes-192
    hash sha
    group 5
    lifetime 86400
    crypto isakmp policy 12
    authentication pre-share
    encryption aes-192
    hash sha
    group 2
    lifetime 86400
    crypto isakmp policy 13
    authentication pre-share
    encryption aes-192
    hash sha
    group 1
    lifetime 86400
    crypto isakmp policy 21
    authentication pre-share
    encryption aes
    hash sha
    group 5
    lifetime 86400
    crypto isakmp policy 22
    authentication pre-share
    encryption aes
    hash sha
    group 2
    lifetime 86400
    crypto isakmp policy 23
    authentication pre-share
    encryption aes
    hash sha
    group 1
    lifetime 86400
    crypto isakmp policy 31
    authentication pre-share
    encryption 3des
    hash sha
    group 5
    lifetime 86400
    crypto isakmp policy 32
    authentication rsa-sig
    encryption des
    hash sha
    group 1
    lifetime 86400
    crypto isakmp policy 33
    authentication pre-share
    encryption 3des
    hash sha
    group 1
    lifetime 86400
    crypto isakmp policy 34
    authentication pre-share
    encryption 3des
    hash sha
    group 2
    lifetime 86400
    Result of the command: "show run group-policy"
    group-policy evertest internal
    group-policy evertest attributes
    dns-server value 10.100.25.252
    vpn-idle-timeout 720
    vpn-tunnel-protocol IPSec l2tp-ipsec
    pfs enable
    split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
    split-tunnel-network-list value vpnsplittunnel
    default-domain value domain-notcorrect.local
    group-policy petero internal
    group-policy petero attributes
    dns-server value 10.100.25.252
    vpn-idle-timeout 720
    pfs enable
    split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
    split-tunnel-network-list value vpnsplittunnel
    default-domain value domain-notcorrect.local
    group-policy awsfilter internal
    group-policy awsfilter attributes
    vpn-filter value amzn-filter
    group-policy vpnpptp internal
    group-policy vpnpptp attributes
    dns-server value 10.100.25.252
    vpn-tunnel-protocol l2tp-ipsec
    group-policy vanheelm internal
    group-policy vanheelm attributes
    dns-server value 10.100.25.252
    vpn-idle-timeout 720
    vpn-tunnel-protocol IPSec l2tp-ipsec
    pfs enable
    split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
    split-tunnel-network-list value vpnsplittunnel
    default-domain value domain-notcorrect.local
    group-policy ciscoVPNuser internal
    group-policy ciscoVPNuser attributes
    dns-server value 10.100.25.10
    vpn-idle-timeout 720
    pfs enable
    split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
    split-tunnel-network-list value vpnsplittunnel
    default-domain value domain-notcorrect.local
    group-policy chauhanv2 internal
    group-policy chauhanv2 attributes
    dns-server value 10.100.25.252
    vpn-idle-timeout 720
    pfs enable
    split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
    split-tunnel-network-list value vpnsplittunnel
    default-domain value domain-notcorrect.local
    group-policy oterop internal
    group-policy oterop attributes
    dns-server value 10.100.25.252
    vpn-idle-timeout 720
    vpn-tunnel-protocol IPSec l2tp-ipsec
    pfs enable
    split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
    split-tunnel-network-list value vpnsplittunnel
    default-domain value domain-notcorrect.local
    group-policy Oterop internal
    group-policy Oterop attributes
    dns-server value 10.100.25.252
    vpn-idle-timeout 30
    group-policy chauhanv internal
    group-policy chauhanv attributes
    dns-server value 10.100.25.252
    vpn-idle-timeout 30
    vpn-tunnel-protocol IPSec l2tp-ipsec
    group-policy bnixon2 internal
    group-policy bnixon2 attributes
    dns-server value 10.100.25.252
    vpn-idle-timeout 720
    vpn-tunnel-protocol IPSec l2tp-ipsec
    pfs enable
    split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
    split-tunnel-network-list value vpnsplittunnel
    default-domain value domain-notcorrect.local
    Result of the command: "show run tunnel-group"
    tunnel-group ciscoVPNuser type remote-access
    tunnel-group ciscoVPNuser general-attributes
    address-pool vpnippool
    default-group-policy ciscoVPNuser
    tunnel-group ciscoVPNuser ipsec-attributes
    pre-shared-key *****
    tunnel-group petero type remote-access
    tunnel-group petero general-attributes
    address-pool vpnippool
    default-group-policy petero
    tunnel-group petero ipsec-attributes
    pre-shared-key *****
    tunnel-group oterop type remote-access
    tunnel-group oterop general-attributes
    address-pool vpnippool
    default-group-policy oterop
    tunnel-group oterop ipsec-attributes
    pre-shared-key *****
    tunnel-group vanheelm type remote-access
    tunnel-group vanheelm general-attributes
    address-pool vpnippool
    default-group-policy vanheelm
    tunnel-group vanheelm ipsec-attributes
    pre-shared-key *****
    tunnel-group chauhanv type remote-access
    tunnel-group chauhanv general-attributes
    default-group-policy chauhanv
    tunnel-group Oterop type remote-access
    tunnel-group Oterop general-attributes
    default-group-policy Oterop
    tunnel-group chauhanv2 type remote-access
    tunnel-group chauhanv2 general-attributes
    address-pool vpnippool
    default-group-policy chauhanv2
    tunnel-group chauhanv2 ipsec-attributes
    pre-shared-key *****
    tunnel-group bnixon2 type remote-access
    tunnel-group bnixon2 general-attributes
    address-pool vpnippool
    default-group-policy bnixon2
    tunnel-group bnixon2 ipsec-attributes
    pre-shared-key *****
    tunnel-group vpnpptp type remote-access
    tunnel-group vpnpptp general-attributes
    address-pool vpnippool
    default-group-policy vpnpptp
    tunnel-group IPNOTWHATIWASEXPECTING4 type ipsec-l2l
    tunnel-group IPNOTWHATIWASEXPECTING4 ipsec-attributes
    pre-shared-key *****
    tunnel-group evertest type remote-access
    tunnel-group evertest general-attributes
    address-pool vpnippool
    default-group-policy evertest
    tunnel-group evertest ipsec-attributes
    pre-shared-key *****
    tunnel-group evertest ppp-attributes
    authentication ms-chap-v2
    tunnel-group IPNOTWHATIWASEXPECTING3 type ipsec-l2l
    tunnel-group IPNOTWHATIWASEXPECTING3 ipsec-attributes
    pre-shared-key *****
    tunnel-group IPNOTWHATIWASEXPECTING2 type ipsec-l2l
    tunnel-group IPNOTWHATIWASEXPECTING2 general-attributes
    default-group-policy awsfilter
    tunnel-group IPNOTWHATIWASEXPECTING2 ipsec-attributes
    pre-shared-key *****
    isakmp keepalive threshold 10 retry 3
    tunnel-group IPNOTWHATIWASEXPECTING type ipsec-l2l
    tunnel-group IPNOTWHATIWASEXPECTING general-attributes
    default-group-policy awsfilter
    tunnel-group IPNOTWHATIWASEXPECTING ipsec-attributes
    pre-shared-key *****
    isakmp keepalive threshold 10 retry 3
    Result of the command: "show vpn-sessiondb detail remote filter protocol L2TPOverIPsec"
    INFO: There are presently no active sessions of the type specified
    Result of the command: "show vpn-sessiondb detail remote filter protocol L2TPOverIPsecOverNAT"
    INFO: There are presently no active sessions of the type specified

  • How can I see how much data passes through my Time Capsule?

    I am thinking of using a cellular data plan at home. My current, rural internet provider is slow and unreliable. I use a MiFi as a backup and have 4G service which is much faster and rarely goes down. I need to see how much data is downloaded and uploaded to compare costs. All our data passes through my Time Capsule.

    A similar app to what Bob mentions is peakhour.. it works on any of the newer OS.
    https://itunes.apple.com/au/app/peakhour/id468946727?mt=12
    It is a good app. BUT.. fat ugly BUTT.. just the same as Bob has explained, it depends on SNMP to work.. and so due to apple removing a very useful and functional protocol from its airport range you can no longer use it. Bizarre.
    I strongly recommend a Netgear WNDR3800 (older model now but you can pick up one cheaply on ebay) and a 3rd party firmware called gargoyle. Apple delete my posts if I point you to it, so you will have to search yourself.
    Replace your tall TC with the Netgear as the main router.. bridge the TC to it and you can continue to use its wireless and for TM backups. The advantage is that gargoyle will not only measure everyones usage, by IP, it is able to set a quota on everyone using the net and you can set that quota for hourly, daily or weekly or monthly. It will track the usage and you can see at a glance what everyone has used.
    It is simple to load.. just like a standard firmware update. The interface is as clear as anyone can make it with such of lot of tools. And the actual router is powerful enough to provide excellent QoS and parental controls on top of measurements and quota.

  • OSB 11g with  PASS-THROUGH PROXY

    hello all,
    I my designing on latest Fusion Middleware 11g Release 1 (11.1.1.5.0)
    a http soap based osb proxy service wraped around owsm saml2.0- sender- vouches-message-protection service policy
    a http soap based osb business service wrapped around owsm saml2.0- sender- vouches-message-protection client policy
    a standalone client is calling this Passive Intermediary Proxy
    In case of pass-through proxy service,
    I would like to know that is it necessary that the policy contract between client --->proxy should be similar to proxy--->backend
    I think so, because proxy is not atall touching the entire stuff starting from <soap:envelope>.........</soap:envelope>
    So client-sent tokens etc. must match with what back end service requires.
    In general, what am I buying by routing the client call through pass-through proxy service if the back-end webservice requires that entire message must by encrypted. In this case there is nothing open for the proxy to view and make any decisions based on that through its pipeline pairs etc.

    Check out the following link...
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/ps6120/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a0080450b5e.html

Maybe you are looking for