Ipsec tunnel across Avaya 4620 phone terminating to cisco vpn concentrator

I have been asked to test out an avaya 4620 phone with the vpn remote client installed on it for our home users.
Here is my problem. The phone connects fine to my concentrator and I have a successful ipsec tunnel built, however, the phone cannot route back to the corportate network. When I look at the tunnel stats, I see bytes received and none transferred. Also, for the ip address of the remote end, I see the ip address that was assigned to it from my local dsl router. My concentrator is supposed to forward dhcp requests on to my internal dhcp server, but this is not occurring. Has anyone seen this before or know where I should start here? any input will be greatly appreciated, thank you all for your time.

Hello Andrew, I know this thread is a bit old, but I am in the process of trying to setup some 9630's to VPN into my Corp. HQ. which is behind a 5510. the problem I am having is with IKE Phase 2, I keep getting an IKE Phase 2 no Response on the phone and this is what Im getting in the ASA log.
4|Feb 18 2010|09:05:04|113019|||||Group = test, Username = user, IP = 71.161.x.x, Session disconnected. Session Type: IKE, Duration: 0h:00m:01s, Bytes xmt: 0, Bytes rcv: 0, Reason: Phase 2 Mismatch
3|Feb 18 2010|09:05:04|713902|||||Group = test, Username = user, IP = 71.161.x.x, Removing peer from correlator table failed, no match!
3|Feb 18 2010|09:05:04|713902|||||Group = test, Username = user, IP = 71.161.x.x, QM FSM error (P2 struct &0xcc259568, mess id 0x8b0aed6d)!
5|Feb 18 2010|09:05:04|713904|||||Group = test, Username = user, IP = 71.161.x.x, All IPSec SA proposals found unacceptable!
5|Feb 18 2010|09:05:04|713119|||||Group = test, Username = user, IP = 71.161.x.x, PHASE 1 COMPLETED
6|Feb 18 2010|09:05:03|713228|||||Group = test, Username = user, IP = 71.161.x.x, Assigned private IP address 5.5.5.1 to remote user
6|Feb 18 2010|09:05:03|713184|||||Group = test, Username = user, IP = 71.161.x.x, Client Type:   Client Application Version:
5|Feb 18 2010|09:05:03|713130|||||Group = test, Username = user, IP = 71.161.x.x, Received unsupported transaction mode attribute: 6
5|Feb 18 2010|09:05:03|713130|||||Group = test, Username = user, IP = 71.161x.x, Received unsupported transaction mode attribute: 5
6|Feb 18 2010|09:05:03|734001|||||DAP: User user, Addr 71.161.x.x, Connection IPSec: The following DAP records were selected for this connection: DfltAccessPolicy
and this is what I get when I debug cyrpto isakmp
RESERVED != 0, PACKET MAY BE CORRUPTFeb 18 11:51:10 [IKEv1]: Group = test, Username = user, IP = 71.161.x.x, QM FSM error (P2 struct &0xcc4d4748, mess id 0x519ff252)!
Feb 18 11:51:10 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = test, Username = user, IP = 71.161.212.49, IKE QM Responder FSM error history (struct &0xcc4d4748) , : QM_DONE, EV_ERROR-->QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_NEGO_SA-->QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_IS_REKEY-->QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_CONFIRM_SA-->QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_PROC_MSG-->QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_HASH_OK-->QM_BLD_MSG2, NullEvent-->QM_BLD_MSG2, EV_COMP_HASH
Feb 18 11:51:10 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = test, Username = user, IP = 71.161.x.x, sending delete/delete with reason message
Feb 18 11:51:10 [IKEv1]: Group = test, Username = user, IP = 71.161.x.x, Removing peer from correlator table failed, no match!
Feb 18 11:51:10 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = test, Username = user, IP = 71.161.x.x, IKE SA AM:18543029 rcv'd Terminate: state AM_ACTIVE flags 0x00418041, refcnt 1, tuncnt 0
Feb 18 11:51:10 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = test, Username = user, IP = 71.161.x.x, IKE SA AM:18543029 terminating: flags 0x01418001, refcnt 0, tuncnt 0
Feb 18 11:51:10 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = test, Username = user, IP = 71.161.x.x, sending delete/delete with reason message
Feb 18 11:51:10 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = test, Username = user, IP = 71.161.x.x, constructing blank hash payload
Feb 18 11:51:10 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = test, Username = user, IP = 71.161.x.x, constructing IKE delete payload
Feb 18 11:51:10 [IKEv1 DEBUG]: Group = test, Username = user, IP = 71.161.x.x, constructing qm hash payload
Feb 18 11:51:10 [IKEv1]: IP = 71.161.x.x, IKE_DECODE SENDING Message (msgid=2b900ae) with payloads : HDR + HASH (8) + DELETE (12) + NONE (0) total length : 80
BEFORE ENCRYPTION
ISAKMP Header
Initiator COOKIE: 68 fb e0 7a 90 5c d7 10
Responder COOKIE: 29 30 54 18 84 da aa d2
Next Payload: Hash
Version: 1.0
Exchange Type: Informational
Flags: (none)
MessageID: AE00B902
Length: 469762048
Payload Hash
    Next Payload: Delete
    Reserved: 00
    Payload Length: 24
    Data:
      08 4b dc 3d 7c 2b 1b 99 c9 6d 6d 36 14 b9 d1 27
      47 e1 0d d6
Payload Delete
    Next Payload: None
    Reserved: 00
    Payload Length: 28
    DOI: IPsec
    Protocol-ID: PROTO_ISAKMP
    Spi Size: 16
    # of SPIs: 1
    SPI (Hex dump):
      68 fb e0 7a 90 5c d7 10 29 30 54 18 84 da aa d2
ISAKMP Header
Initiator COOKIE: 68 fb e0 7a 90 5c d7 10
Responder COOKIE: 29 30 54 18 84 da aa d2
Next Payload: Hash
Version: 1.0
Exchange Type: Informational
Flags: (Encryption)
MessageID: 02B900AE
Length: 84
RESERVED != 0, PACKET MAY BE CORRUPTFeb 18 11:51:10 [IKEv1]: Ignoring msg to mark SA with dsID 1380352 dead because SA deleted
if you could provide any help it would be greatly appreciated as I have been battling this for a few days now.
thanks,
Paul

Similar Messages

"Discoverying Proxy" across a IPSEC Tunnel over wireless

Bear with me here, there are lot of moving parts in this puzzle, and I'm unsure where to look.
Users are using IE7 (some IE8's), group policy has "Automatically Detect Settings", and we have published a WPAD DNS entry, and are hosting the PAC file on the S370 box. We're very early in our deployment, so we're still functioning in "Monitor mode", till management has some information, and will direct us on what traffic they will allow .
The majority of users are located at our main site, the same site our Proxy is at, these users are having zero problems. For all intents and purposes, they don't even know the proxy is there.
about 30% of our users are located at remote sites. They are connected via an IPSEC L2L VPN tunnel (ASA5505 at remote site, connecting to an ASA5550 at main site)
The users using a wired connection work fine
Wireless users, connecting via LWAPP accesspoints (Wireless LAN controller version 4.2.176.0) at the remote sites, experience a delay connecting to the proxy, usually a few minutes. I actually believe that they are bypassing the proxy, since it takes two minutes. Unfortually, most of my users at the remote sites are wireless.
Thing's I'm immediately going to try are upgrading to the latest version of WLAN controller software, and then open a TAC case on the wireless LAN controller, but before I do this, has anyone run across something similar to this before? (Proxy discovery having issues across an IPSEC tunnel)
Mike

Hi Javier,
Please explain to me how I should explain this technically elaborate issue to either ISP tech support? :-P
Well, I tried my best and ended up on the phone for 5 hours with 6 different techs between Verizon and TWC BC. I should get paid for explaining them the basics of networking.
Anyhow, my last desperate attempt was to ask the tech to reboot my ONT so I'd get a new IP. Maybe some traffic balancer or filter didn't like my source and destination IP combination. Maybe it was cursed.
Ring. Ring. I finally got an awesome tech (John) from Verizon who actually knew what he was talking about. I connected my Verizon supplied router again and asked if he could log into it or run pings from it remotely (to show him that I'm not crazy). Though other techs told me that was not possible, he did in just a few seconds without much pain. He saw the pings failing as well. Then he said pings from the Verizon ONT gateway were successful, so I assumed it must have been an issue somewhere in Verizon's neck of the (network) woods where the problem persisted.
Long story short: The new IP address worked like a charm and no more packet drops.

Not Seeing NAT Translations Across GRE IPSec Tunnel

Hello,
I have a P2P GRE over IPSec tunnel beween two 3725s using NAT overload and the Internet as transport. I can reach the backside networks, tunnel endpoints, etc., and I have verified that the traffic is being encrypted. What I am not seeing however are any NAT translations taking place. They must be happeing because my traffic is being routed through the tunnel via the public interfaces. I am assuming that this is a result of the checksum being altered when the translation is done.
Would I be correct in assuming that I could use something like NAT Transparency or IPSec over TCP/UDP to fix the problem and begin seeing NAT translations?
Thanks for any help you guys may be able to provide!
Anthony, CCNA (Network/Voice)

Can you send over the configurations
You seem to have a phase 1 issue, it's not negotiating correctly.
Thanks

Static NAT with IPSec tunnel

Hi,
I have a hopefully fairly basic question regarding configuring some static NAT entries on a remote site 887 router which also has a IPSec tunnel configured back to our main office. I am fairly new to networking so forgive me if I ask some really silly questions!
I have been asked to configure some mobile phone "boost" boxes, which will take a mobile phone and send the traffic over the Internet - this is required because of the poor signal at the branch. These boxes connect via Ethernet to the local network and need a direct connection to the Internet and also certain UDP and TCP ports opening up.
There is only one local subnet on site and the ACL for the crypto map dictates that all traffic from this network to our head office go over the tunnel. What I wanted to do was create another vlan, give this a different subnet. Assign these mobile boost boxes DHCP reservations (there is no interface to them so they cannot be configured) and then allow them to break out to the Internet locally rather than send the traffic back to our head office and have to open up ports on our main ASA firewall.
From my research I came across this article (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk583/tk372/technologies_configuration_example09186a0080094634.shtml
So I went ahead and created a separate vlan and DHCP reservation and then also followed the guidelines outlined above about using a route-map to stop the traffic being sent down the tunnel and then configured static NAT statements for each of the four ports these boost boxes need to work. I configure the ip nat inside/outside on the relevant ports (vlan 3 for inside, dialer 1 for outside)
The configuration can be seen below for the NAT part;
! Denies vpn interesting traffic but permits all other
ip access-list extended NAT-Traffic
deny ip 172.19.191.0 0.0.0.255 172.16.0.0 0.3.255.255
deny ip 172.19.191.0 0.0.0.255 10.0.0.0 0.255.255.255
deny ip 172.19.191.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.128.0 0.0.3.255
deny ip 172.19.191.0 0.0.0.255 12.15.28.0 0.0.0.255
deny ip 172.19.191.0 0.0.0.255 137.230.0.0 0.0.255.255
deny ip 172.19.191.0 0.0.0.255 165.26.0.0 0.0.255.255
deny ip 172.19.191.0 0.0.0.255 192.56.231.0 0.0.0.255
deny ip 172.19.191.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.49.0 0.0.0.255
deny ip 172.19.191.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.61.0 0.0.0.255
deny ip 172.19.191.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.240.0 0.0.7.255
deny ip 172.19.191.0 0.0.0.255 205.206.192.0 0.0.3.255
permit ip any any
! create route map
route-map POLICY-NAT 10
match ip address NAT-Traffic
! static nat
ip nat inside source static tcp 192.168.1.2 50 85.233.188.47 50 route-map POLICY-NAT extendable
ip nat inside source static udp 192.168.1.2 123 85.233.188.47 123 route-map POLICY-NAT extendable
ip nat inside source static udp 192.168.1.2 500 85.233.188.47 500 route-map POLICY-NAT extendable
ip nat inside source static udp 192.168.1.2 4500 85.233.188.47 4500 route-map POLICY-NAT extendable
Unfortunately this didn't work as expected, and soon after I configured this the VPN tunnel went down. Am I right in thinking that UDP port 500 is also the same port used by ISAKMP so by doing this configuration it effectively breaks IPSec?
Am I along the right lines in terms of configuration? And if not can anyone point me in the direction of anything that may help at all please?
Many thanks in advance
Brian

Hi,
Sorry to bump this thread up but is anyone able to assist in configuration? I am now thinking that if I have another public IP address on the router which is not used for the VPN tunnel I can perform the static NAT using that IP which should not break anything?
Thanks
Brian

ASA5500: TCP state bypass for traffic, coming from IPsec tunnel

Hello!
We have problems on central firewall with restricting traffic coming from remote office from IPsec. (The network sheme is attached)
All branch offices are connected to central asa though IPsec.
The main aim is to rule access from branch offices only on the central firewall, NOT on each IPsec tunnel
According to the sheme:
172.16.1.0/24 is on of the branch office LANs
10.1.1.0/24 and 10.2.2.0/24 are central office LAN
The crypto ACL looks like permit ip 172.16.1.0/24 10.0.0.0/8
The aim is to
restrict access from 172.16.1.0/24 to 10.1.1.0/24
When packets are generated from host 10.1.1.10 to 172.16.1.0/24 all is ok - they are dropped by acl2
When packets are generated from 172.16.1.0/24 to 10.1.1.10 they are not dropped by any ACL - the reason is stateful firewall - traffic bypasses all access lists on a back path
I thought that TCP State Bypass feature can solve this problem and disable stateful firewall inspection for traffic coming from 172.16.1.0/24 to 10.1.1.0/24, but it didn't help.
The central asa 5500 is configured according to cisco doc http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/asa/asa82/configuration/guide/conns_tcpstatebypass.html
access-list tcp_bypass_acl extended permit tcp 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.1.1.0 255.255.255.0
class-map tcp_bypass_map
description "TCP traffic that bypasses stateful firewall"
match access-list tcp_bypass_acl
policy-map tcp_bypass_policy
class tcp_bypass_map
set connection advanced-options tcp-state-bypass
service-policy tcp_bypass_policy interface outside
service-policy tcp_bypass_policy interface inside
Does anyone know, how to make TCP State Bypass works properly?

I understand the pain of creating diffrent crypto for diffrent tunnels but i never come across better solution. However TCP state bypass is not going to help in regards to restrict access. TCP state bypass is a way to for FW to act like router which does not do statefull and I dont think that fits in your scenario.
You can still control access on center site by using vpn-filters.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/hw/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00808c9a87.shtml
Thanks
Ajay

Trying to Connect an Avaya 5610 VPN phone to a Cisco WRVS4400N VPN Router

I am trying to connect a VOIP VPN phone to a network that is hosted by a Cisco WRVS4400N Router running Firmware version 2.0.0.8
I do not need a tunnel as I want to be able to connect this phone from any remote location. But I need to be able to setup IPSec I believe.
The phone uss IKE parameters of DH2-3DES-ANY and IPSec Parameters od NOPFS-ANY-ANY.
Does the VPN Client Accounts support the above parameters?
I have tried setting the IKE to DH2-3DES-SHA1, and it did not work, and I tried DH?-ANY-ANY and IPSec of DH?-Null-ANY.
I see where people have got this phone to work with Netgear FVS314, and I figured this one sets up about the same as the Netgear.
Anyone ever do this with this router and phone? I would rather get this done witha $300 router versus an $1800 one.

The VPN Wizard, I believe is in the PDM menu... not sure since I don't use it.
SSH.....
ssh 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 outside
ssh 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 inside
Hope this helps,
JD

How many IPSec Tunnels an ASA 5500 series supports

Hi All,
I tried looking in ASA documentations but unable to find out that how many IPSec Tunnels can be terminated to an ASA cluster. I have 5545 running only two IPSec Tunnels so far but need to terminate 18 sites all up and would like to confirm how many tunnels we could terminate? Is there a limitaion to it?
Thanks heaps
Shan

Yes, there is a limit. But its far away from your requirement. On the 5545-X you can terminate 2500 VPN-Peers:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/vpndevc/ps6032/ps6094/ps6120/at_a_glance_c45-701635.pdf
Sent from Cisco Technical Support iPad App

Dynamic ipsec tunnelling

Hi,
Is it possible to configure dynamic ipsec tunnelling? The idea is the tunnel to be established when someone wants to connect and then the tunnel to be released when the connection is terminated...
Is there any implementation offering that? Any ideas?
br,
Spyros

the deafule IPSec site to site behivour like that
only what u need it to make the interesting traffic matched thourgh and ACL then use this acl in ur ipsec crypto map config
hop this helpful

Unidirectional IPSec tunnel

I have 3 routers (2 x 2811, 1 x 1841 all with hardware encryption) on 12.4(17) code. Customer was using GRE tunnels inside IPSec tunnels (using crypto maps) for the purpose of enabling dynamic routing between the sites. The DR router was moved to a new location with a different Internet IP address. Since then we have had issues with the IPSec tunnels (which makes me suspect there were issues before, even though the customer claims it was working ok). IOS code was 12.4(4)T, we have upgraded due to the issues we had. Also configured PSK instead of certs to eliminate that as an issue. Will go back to using certs once we get it all working.
Now HO to DR and HO to MSt works fine. DR to MSt is a one way tunnel. Traffic from MSt is never received on the DR router. "Sh crypto ipsec sa" on the MSt router shows packets being encrypted and decrypted. On the DR router it only shows packets being encrypted, but zero packets being decrypted.
All services are DSL. On HO and MSt the DSL service is terminated on the router. At DR it is terminated on an ISP device and connected to the DR router via ethernet.
I reconfigured DR and MSt routers to use a GRE tunnel with the 'tunnel protection ipsec profile' feature and we have the same issue. The GRE tunnel works fine unencrypted, but is only one way when encrypted.
I have tried disabling NAT and access lists, though with these enabled the GRE tunnel works ok unencrypted. I have also tried disabling the hardware encryption.
I have done a lot of IOS IPSec work and never been unable to get things working so this one has me stumped.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.

Hi,
Thanks for your input.
I have already tried the following between DR and MSt:
int tunnel
ip address private_ip subnet_mask
tunnel source outside_interface_name
tunnel destination peer_address
tunnel protection ipsec profile blah
We get the same symptoms as in the original config. If I remove the tunnel protection command, and leave the tunnel unencrypted, it works fine. In the original config the tunnel source and destination addresses are loopbacks on each router:
int tunnel
ip address private_ip subnet_mask
tunnel source loopback0
tunnel destination remote-router-loopback0
The crypto map was matching all traffic between the tunnel source/destination addresses. A static route for the remote loopback0 points out the interface with the crypto map. I wondered if I'd have trouble using a crypto map for HO to DR while using the tunnel protection feature for DR to MSt, but the symptoms are identical. Also, the IPSec SA's for the tunnel interface are created correctly.

IPSEC tunnel between adsl router (1841-K9) and Windows ISA

Hi. Can anybody point me in the direction of how to achieve this?
Basically weve got a UC500 running CME. We want to send a home worker home with a router and a phone, and allow their router (probably an 1841 with a WIC 1ADSL and K9 pack) to connect to our SBS server with ISA on it and make an IPSEC tunnel.
Thanks!!!

This is now showing up with running ssh over this tunnel. I can get the initial connection, but certain commands are not going through.

IPSec tunnel on sub-interface on ASA 5510

Hello All,
I working on a security solution using ASA firewall and need some technical advice on ASA. Is it possible to setup a IPSec tunnels on each subinterface of a physical interface on ASA 5510?
I would be greatul if someone please reply post this with some details.
Regards,
Muds

Hi Jennifer,
Thanks very much for your reply. I understand where you coming from, but the reason of using sub-interfaces is that, we have only one physical interface on the firewall connected to the MPLS cloud, and we need to setup a seperate IPSec tunnels for each client for security and integrity. In the current scenario, I have static peers and we can easily setup a static route to peer address.
Many thanks for your assistance, please feel free to to advise if you have any other suggestion.
Regards,
Muds

Cisco ASA 5505 Site to site VPN IPSEC tunnel to an Clavister Firewall

Hi,
I have weird problem with a Site to site VPN tunnel from a Cisco ASA 5505 to an Clavister Firewall.
When I restart the Cisco ASA 5505 the tunnel is up and down,up, down, down, and I get all strange messages when I see if the tunnel is up or down with the syntax: show crypto isakmp sa
After a while like 5-10 min the vpn site to site tunnel is up and here is the strange thing happening I have all accesslists and tunnel accesslists right I can only access one remote network (Main site Clavister Firewall) trought the vpn tunnel behind the Cisco ASA 5505, and I have 5 more remote networks that I want to access but only one remote network is working trought the vpn tunnel behind the Cisco ASA. I see that when I do this syntax in ASA: show crypto ipsec sa.
They had a Clavister Firewall before on that site before and now they have a Cisco ASA 5505 and all the rules on the main site thats have the big Clavister Firewall is intact so the problems are in the Cisco ASA 5505.
Here is some logs that ASDM give me about the tunnel issue, but like I said, the tunnel is up and only one remote network is reachable in that tunnel.....
3
Nov 21 2012
07:11:09
713902
Group = 195.149.180.254, IP = 195.149.169.254, Removing peer from correlator table failed, no match!
3
Nov 21 2012
07:11:09
713902
Group = 195.149.180.254, IP = 195.149.169.254, QM FSM error (P2 struct &0xc92462d0, mess id 0x1c6bf927)!
3
Nov 21 2012
07:11:09
713061
Group = 195.149.180.254, IP = 195.149.169.254, Rejecting IPSec tunnel: no matching crypto map entry for remote proxy 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0/0 local proxy 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0/0 on interface outside
5
Nov 21 2012
07:11:09
713119
Group = 195.149.180.254, IP = 195.149.169.254, PHASE 1 COMPLETED
Here is from the syntax: show crypto isakmp sa
Result of the command: "show crypto isakmp sa"
   Active SA: 1
    Rekey SA: 0 (A tunnel will report 1 Active and 1 Rekey SA during rekey)
Total IKE SA: 1
1   IKE Peer: 195.149.180.254
    Type    : L2L             Role    : responder
    Rekey   : no              State   : MM_ACTIVE
Result of the command: "show crypto ipsec sa"
interface: outside
    Crypto map tag: CustomerCryptoMap, seq num: 10, local addr: 213.180.90.29
      access-list arvika_garnisonen permit ip 172.22.65.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.123.0 255.255.255.0
      local ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (172.22.65.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
      remote ident (addr/mask/prot/port): (192.168.123.0/255.255.255.0/0/0)
      current_peer:195.149.180.254
      #pkts encaps: 2188, #pkts encrypt: 2188, #pkts digest: 2188
      #pkts decaps: 2082, #pkts decrypt: 2082, #pkts verify: 2082
      #pkts compressed: 0, #pkts decompressed: 0
      #pkts not compressed: 2188, #pkts comp failed: 0, #pkts decomp failed: 0
      #pre-frag successes: 0, #pre-frag failures: 0, #fragments created: 0
      #PMTUs sent: 0, #PMTUs rcvd: 0, #decapsulated frgs needing reassembly: 0
      #send errors: 0, #recv errors: 0
      local crypto endpt.: 213.180.67.29, remote crypto endpt.: 195.149.180.254
      path mtu 1500, ipsec overhead 74, media mtu 1500
      current outbound spi: E715B315
    inbound esp sas:
      spi: 0xFAC769EB (4207372779)
         transform: esp-aes-256 esp-sha-hmac no compression
         in use settings ={L2L, Tunnel, PFS Group 5, }
         slot: 0, conn_id: 2879488, crypto-map: CustomerCryptoMap
         sa timing: remaining key lifetime (kB/sec): (38738/2061)
         IV size: 16 bytes
         replay detection support: Y
         Anti replay bitmap:
          0xFFFFFFFF 0xFFFFFFFF
    outbound esp sas:
      spi: 0xE715B315 (3876958997)
         transform: esp-aes-256 esp-sha-hmac no compression
         in use settings ={L2L, Tunnel, PFS Group 5, }
         slot: 0, conn_id: 2879488, crypto-map: CustomerCryptoMap
         sa timing: remaining key lifetime (kB/sec): (38673/2061)
         IV size: 16 bytes
         replay detection support: Y
         Anti replay bitmap:
          0x00000000 0x00000001
And here are my Accesslists and vpn site to site config:
crypto isakmp enable outside
crypto isakmp policy 10
authentication pre-share
encryption aes-256
hash sha
group 5
lifetime 84600
crypto isakmp nat-traversal 40
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA esp-aes-256 esp-sha-hmac
crypto ipsec security-association lifetime seconds 28800
crypto ipsec security-association lifetime kilobytes 4608000
crypto map CustomerCryptoMap 10 match address VPN_Tunnel
crypto map CustomerCryptoMap 10 set pfs group5
crypto map CustomerCryptoMap 10 set peer 195.149.180.254
crypto map CustomerCryptoMap 10 set transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA
crypto map CustomerCryptoMap interface outside
access-list VPN_Tunnel extended permit ip 172.22.65.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.123.0 255.255.255.0 -------> This is the only remote network I can reach behind the Cisco ASA and the other remote networks dont work..
access-list VPN_Tunnel extended permit ip 172.22.65.0 255.255.255.0 host 10.1.34.5
access-list VPN_Tunnel extended permit ip 172.22.65.0 255.255.255.0 host 10.1.20.76
access-list VPN_Tunnel extended permit ip 172.22.65.0 255.255.255.0 host 62.88.129.221
access-list VPN_Tunnel extended permit ip 172.22.65.0 255.255.255.0 172.22.71.0 255.255.255.0
access-list nonat extended permit ip 172.22.65.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.123.0 255.255.255.0
access-list nonat extended permit ip 172.22.65.0 255.255.255.0 host 10.1.34.5
access-list nonat extended permit ip 172.22.65.0 255.255.255.0 host 10.1.20.76
access-list nonat extended permit ip 172.22.65.0 255.255.255.0 host 62.88.129.221
access-list nonat extended permit ip 172.22.65.0 255.255.255.0 172.22.71.0 255.255.255.0
nat (inside) 0 access-list nonat
All these remote networks are at the Main Site Clavister Firewall.
Best Regards
Michael

Hi,
I'd start by getting the configuration of the remote site related to Local/Remote network configurations and go through them. Even though no changes have been made.
If they are mirror images of eachother already I'd say its probably some problem related to Cisco/Clavister setup
Seems especially wierd to me that one of the error messages includes 0.0.0.0 lines.
I have run into some problems with L2L VPN configurations when our Cisco device just doesnt want to work with the remote end device. In some cases we have confirmed that our networks defined for the L2L VPN are exactly the same and yet when checking debugs on the ASA side we can see the remote end device using totally wrong network masks for the VPN negotiaton and therefore it failed. That problem we corrected with changing the network masks a bit.
Maybe you could try to change the Encryption Domain configurations a bit and test it then.
You could also maybe take some debugs on the Phase2 and see if you get anymore hints as to what could be the problem when only one network is working for the L2L VPN.
- Jouni

Multiple site to site IPSec tunnels to one ASA5510

Question on ASA VPN tunnels. I have one ASA 5510 in our corporate office, I have two subnets in our corporate office that are configured in the ASA in a Object group. I have a site to site IPSEC tunnel already up and that has been working. I am trying to set up another site to site IPSEC tunnel to a different location that will need to be setup to access the same two subnets. I'm not sure if this can be setup or not, I think I had a problem with setting up two tunnels that were trying to connect to the same subnet but that was between the same two ASA's. Anyways the new tunnel to a new site is not coming up and I want to make sure it is not the subnet issue. The current working tunnel is between two ASA 5510's, the new tunnel we are trying to build is between the ASA and a Sonicwall firewall. Any help would be appreciated.

Hi,
Regarding setting up the new L2L VPN connection..
Should be no problem (to my understanding) to configure the new L2L VPN connection through the other ISP interface (0/3). You will need to atleast route the remote VPN peers IP address towards that link. The L2L VPN forming should add a route for the remote networks through that L2L VPN. If not reverse route injection should handle it in the cryptomap configurations.
I guess rest of the setup depends on what will be using the 0/0 ISP and what will be using the 0/3 ISP.
If you are going to put the default route towards the 0/3 ISP you will have to think of something for the 0/0 ISP if some of your local LAN devices are going to use it for Internet also. (Possible routing problems) On the other hand if you have remote VPN Client users using the 0/0 ISP there should be no routing problem for them as they would be initiating connection through that 0/0 ISP link through ASA so ASA should know where to forward the return traffic.
Most of my 2 ISP setups have been implemented with a router in front of the actual ASA/PIX/FWSM firewalls where the router has performed Policy Routing based on the source IP address from the firewalls and then settings the correct gateway towards the correct ISP.
- Jouni

Cisco ASA 5505 IPSec tunnel won't establish until remote site attempts to connect

I have a site to site IPSec tunnel setup and operational but periodically the remote site goes down, because of a somewhat reliable internet connection. The only way to get the tunnel to re-establish is to go to the remote site and simply issue a ping from a workstation on the remote network. We were having this same issue with a Cisco PIX 506E but decided to upgrade the hardware and see if that resolve the issue. It ran for well over a year and our assumtions was that the issue was resolved. I was looking in the direction of the security-association lifetime but if we power cycle the unit, I would expect that it would kill the SA but even after power cycling, the VPN does not come up automatically.
Any assistance would be appreciated.
ASA Version 8.2(1)
hostname KRPS-FW
domain-name lottonline.org
enable password uniQue
passwd uniQue
names
interface Vlan1
nameif inside
security-level 100
ip address 10.20.30.1 255.255.255.0
interface Vlan2
nameif outside
security-level 0
ip address xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 255.255.255.248
interface Ethernet0/0
switchport access vlan 2
interface Ethernet0/1
description Inside Network on VLAN1
interface Ethernet0/2
shutdown
interface Ethernet0/3
shutdown
interface Ethernet0/4
shutdown
interface Ethernet0/5
shutdown
interface Ethernet0/6
shutdown
interface Ethernet0/7
description Inside Network on VLAN1
ftp mode passive
dns server-group DefaultDNS
domain-name lottonline.org
access-list NONAT extended permit ip 10.20.30.0 255.255.255.0 10.20.20.0 255.255.255.0
access-list NONAT extended permit ip 10.20.30.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0
access-list NONAT extended permit ip 10.20.30.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.15.0 255.255.255.0
access-list KWPS-BITP extended permit ip 10.20.30.0 255.255.255.0 10.20.20.0 255.255.255.0
access-list KWPS-BITP extended permit ip 10.20.30.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0
access-list KWPS-BITP extended permit ip 10.20.30.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.15.0 255.255.255.0
icmp unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1
no asdm history enable
arp timeout 14400
global (outside) 1 interface
nat (inside) 0 access-list NONAT
nat (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
access-group OUTSIDE_ACCESS_IN in interface outside
route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx 1
timeout xlate 3:00:00
timeout conn 1:00:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
timeout sunrpc 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 1:00:00 mgcp 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00
timeout sip 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 sip-invite 0:03:00 sip-disconnect 0:02:00
timeout sip-provisional-media 0:02:00 uauth 0:05:00 absolute
timeout tcp-proxy-reassembly 0:01:00
dynamic-access-policy-record DfltAccessPolicy
http server enable
http 10.20.30.0 255.255.255.0 inside
http 10.20.20.0 255.255.255.0 inside
snmp-server enable traps snmp authentication linkup linkdown coldstart
crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA esp-aes-256 esp-sha-hmac
crypto ipsec security-association lifetime seconds 28800
crypto ipsec security-association lifetime kilobytes 4608000
crypto dynamic-map DYNMAP 65535 set transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA
crypto map VPNMAP 1 match address KWPS-BITP
crypto map VPNMAP 1 set peer xxx.xxx.xxx.001
crypto map VPNMAP 1 set transform-set ESP-AES-256-SHA
crypto map VPNMAP 65535 ipsec-isakmp dynamic DYNMAP
crypto map VPNMAP interface outside
crypto isakmp enable outside
crypto isakmp policy 5
authentication pre-share
encryption 3des
hash sha
group 2
lifetime 86400
crypto isakmp policy 65535
authentication pre-share
encryption 3des
hash sha
group 2
lifetime 86400
ssh timeout 5
console timeout 0
management-access inside
tunnel-group xxx.xxx.xxx.001 type ipsec-l2l
tunnel-group xxx.xxx.xxx.001 ipsec-attributes
pre-shared-key somekey

Hi there,
I had same issue with PIX 506E and it was not even a circuit issue and I got ride of it and problem got fixed with PIX515E
I don't know, the device is too old to stay alive.
thanks

All the traffic go through IPsec tunnel(site to site ) ,but something seems not working correctly

Hi, all,
I have seen a good post in google.com about how to make all the client's traffic though IPsec tunnel then out to the Internet from the Main site,now I attach this configuration and application for discussion, and what the problem is that I am still confused with the configuration on Main site , I hope anyone who can tell me more detail and how to accomplish it. Any answer will be appreciated , thank you !
Quote :
Question ? :
Mine is a very simple configuration. I have 2 sites linked via an IPsec tunnel. Dallas is my Main HQ R1 and Austin R2 is my remote office. I want all traffic from Austin to route thru the tunnel up to Dallas, then out to the Internet.
Dallas (Main) Lan Net is: 10.10.200.0/24
Austin (Remote) LAN Net is: 10.20.2.0/24
The Dallas (Main) site has a VPN config of:
Local Net: 0.0.0.0/0
Remote Net: 10.20.2.0/24
The Austin (Remote) site has a VPN config of:
10.20.2.0/24
Remote Net: 0.0.0.0/0
The tunnel gets established just fine. From the Austin LAN clients, I can ping the router at the main site (10.10.200.1). This is how I know the tunnel is created, but I cannot ping anything beyond the router from the Austin LAN, e.g. 8.8.8.8.
I'm sure it's something simple I failed to configure. Anyone have any pointers or hints?
Answer:
Thanks to Jimp from the other thread, I was able to see why it was not working. To fix, I had to change the Outbound NAT on the main side to Manual. Then I created a new Outbound NAT rule that included the subnet from the Austin network (10.20.2.0). Basically, I just created a copy of the default rule and changed the Source network.
Once I made this change, Voila! Traffic from the remote side started heading out to the Internet. Now all traffic flows thru the Main site. It makes perfect sense why I needed to make this change, it just took a slap in the head from Jimp to point me in the right direction.
My question ?
The answer said "To fix, I had to change the Outbound NAT on the main side to Manual. Then I created a new Outbound NAT rule that included the subnet from the Austin network (10.20.2.0). Basically, I just created a copy of the default rule and changed the Source network." what this mean and
how to do it , could anybody give me the specific configuration ? thanks a lot.

Thank you for Jouni's reply, following is the configuration on Cisco 2800 router ,no firewall enable, :
crypto isakmp policy 100
encr aes 256
authentication pre-share
group 2
crypto isakmp key x.x.x address 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
crypto isakmp keepalive 60
crypto ipsec transform-set IPsectrans esp-3des esp-md5-hmac
crypto dynamic-map IPsecdyn 100
set transform-set IPsectrans
match address 102
crypto map IPsecmap 100 ipsec-isakmp dynamic IPsecdyn
interface Loopback1
ip address 10.10.200.1 255.255.255.0
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 113.113.1.1 255.255.255.128
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly
duplex auto
speed auto
crypto map IPsecmap
interface FastEthernet0/1
ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly
duplex auto
speed auto
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 113.113.1.2
ip http server
no ip http secure-server
ip nat inside source list 100 interface FastEthernet0/0 overload
access-list 100 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 any
access-list 102 permit ip any 10.20.2.0 0.0.0.255

Ipsec tunnel across Avaya 4620 phone terminating to cisco vpn concentrator

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for