Is 1080 at 24 the same as 1080p24?

Hi,
I'm a little confused. I'm trying to output a 720p24 HDV project for viewing on an HDCAM deck that only handles 1080i, but WILL do 24fps. I need to use Compressor to recompress it, and I'm only finding 24 fps settings when talking about 1080p, not 1080i. Is this the same?
Thanks

Kona 3 is the only card that will cross-convert from 720p24 to 1080p24 (or PsF24)
PsF=Progressive Segmented Frame. This is Sony's implementation of progressive frames. It is the method in which a progressive frame is recorded to tape.
With a decklink card you would need to paste your sequence into a 1080p24 timeline and render it, then output at 1080p24 to HDCAM.
Frame rates: When most people talk about 24p what they really mean is 23.976 which is abbreviated to 23.98. 23.98 is compatible with NTSC in that when you add 3:2 pulldown you get 29.97. It is intended for footage that will stay in a digital realm. (Experts, I know I'm oversimplifying) True 24p is just that, video that runs at 24 fps. The Sony Cine Alta line of products support this frame rate. It is generally intended for porjects that will end up on film. However 23.98 can easily be transferred to film as well. Confused yet? It's a beast to wrap your head around. Just know that unless you shot with high end camera (I'm talking about an F23, a Viper, etc) your 24fps footage is really running at 23.98fps.
So the ultimate question becomes are you on the West Side or are you closer to the Valley and is it worth it to spend the money to do this right? If it is worth it to do this right then I would suggest going to West Post Digital in Santa Monica or Alpha Dogs in Burbank to do your layoff.
Take a self contained QT that matches your sequence settings to either of these places and they will know what to do.
West Post - ask for Kenny
Alpha Dogs - ask for Terry

Similar Messages

  • Combine 720 and 1080 video of the same performance?

    In early November I have been asked to video a performance. I have 720 and a 1080 cameras. What can I expect when I edit. I will be using jus one camera for audio source. I am using OS 10.8.5. Plan to use iMovie, but Final Cut Express is available.

    I would just buy a new kit: http://www.crucial.com/store/listparts.aspx?model=Pavilion%20g6-2040nr&Cat=RAM
    It's less than $40.

  • Is iFrame the same resolution as 1080/60p or AVCHD?

    Just got a new Panasonic TM900 camcorder. On my pre-Intel G5, I can only import video shot in iFrame mode? Is iFrame the same resolution as 1080/60p or AVCHD?
    Is there any way to tell the difference between HD video and standard video?
    Thanks

    iFrame files have a resolution of 960 x 540 pixels, and a frame rate of either 25 fps or 30 fps.
    So no, if you shoot using the iFrame format, you're not getting as high resolution video as 1080/60p or 1080/50p, and you're not getting as high a frame rate either.

  • HD video and Jpeg pics in the same project/sequence?

    I want to use both HD video (1929x1084;24bps) and Jpeg pictures from my DSLR camera in the same sequence. My problem is that when i choose the correct presets for the video (DSLR 1080p24) then the Jpegs gets cropped in the program monitor (I only see part of the picture). How can I fix this?
    It is probably a simple question but I haven't been able to find an answer. 
    Kind regards

    There are basically two ways (plus one variation) to address this.
    Your stills are overly-large, for the Project Preset's Frame Size. You can apply the fixed Effect>Motion>Scale to Scale them to the Frame Size (1920 x 1080), or can check Scale to Default Frame Size (that's the variation). Or, you use a program, like Photoshop, to Scale to 1920 x 1080.
    Until CS5, PrPro was not that good at Scaling, so PS was the way to go. Things changed with CS5, but one is still shoving around a bunch of pixels, that will not be needed, and this taxes the computer.
    Good luck,
    Hunt
    PS - This ARTICLE will give you some background, and tips on doing the Scaling in PS.

  • Two reservations at the same time

    Hi,
    I have a resource mailbox configured to automatically accept reservation and to deny conflicts. Here is how it is configured in details :
    [PS] C:\Windows\system32>Get-CalendarProcessing room.barbaramcclintock | fl
    RunspaceId                          : 66725fc6-c585-4211-8XXX
    AutomateProcessing                  : AutoAccept
    AllowConflicts                      : False
    BookingWindowInDays                 : 1080
    MaximumDurationInMinutes            : 1380
    AllowRecurringMeetings              : True
    EnforceSchedulingHorizon            : True
    ScheduleOnlyDuringWorkHours         : False
    ConflictPercentageAllowed           : 0
    MaximumConflictInstances            : 0
    ForwardRequestsToDelegates          : True
    DeleteAttachments                   : True
    DeleteComments                      : True
    RemovePrivateProperty               : True
    DeleteSubject                       : True
    AddOrganizerToSubject               : True
    DeleteNonCalendarItems              : True
    TentativePendingApproval            : True
    EnableResponseDetails               : True
    OrganizerInfo                       : True
    ResourceDelegates                   : {}
    RequestOutOfPolicy                  : {}
    AllRequestOutOfPolicy               : False
    BookInPolicy                        : {}
    AllBookInPolicy                     : True
    RequestInPolicy                     : {}
    AllRequestInPolicy                  : False
    AddAdditionalResponse               : False
    AdditionalResponse                  :
    RemoveOldMeetingMessages            : True
    AddNewRequestsTentatively           : True
    ProcessExternalMeetingMessages      : False
    RemoveForwardedMeetingNotifications : False
    MailboxOwnerId                      : XXX/RESOURCES/Salle Barbara Mc CLINTOCK
    Identity                            : XXX/RESOURCES/Salle Barbara Mc CLINTOCK
    IsValid                             : True
    ObjectState                         : Changed
    Now if I look at the room calendar, I see several reservations at the same time. I of course need to avoid these situations ! How can I find out how this happened and how can I fix it ?
    Thanks for your help

    I made some progress in my investiguation. I noticed that if I open the room calendar > new appointment > scheduling assistant, then the room name and availbilites appears but the room shows up as the meeting organizer. if I book the reservation, I
    will never receive a deny or accept answer from the room and I'll be able to create conflicts. If I try to create a conflict, a message will tell me that there is a conflict, but it'll me proceed.
    But if I open my personnal calendar > new apointment > scheduling assistant > add the room as a resource AND NOT as the meeting organizer like above, then the automatic process of the booking will work, i.e. I will receive a deny or an accept from
    the room if I book it, so that I wont end up with conflicts.
    Now the question is : how can I make sure that my users wont be booking rooms from the room calendar ? or is there is another better way to deal with this issue ? How do you personaly deal with room resources ?
    Thanks

  • QuickTime Player 10.1 no more includes the ability to save a movie file in the same format as the original movie after editing it? No, it doesn't!

    Since upgraded to Lion, I have to wait for QuickTime Player 10.1 to "CONVERT" every file that I edited in it.
    Yes, it might save some disk space for me.(Which is not always the case though.) But it also takes almost 10 times or more as it did when back on Snow Leopard with QuickTime Player 10.0 there I could save any file in the same format as the original movie WITH NO NEED TO CONVERT IT.
    Now I have to wait like 10 minutes to delete just a few frames.(The time it takes depends upon the original size of that movie. The larger the longer.) And guess what? If you have two clips originally split up from a movie and sperately getting saved(converted actually) with a loooooooot of time, and you naively added one of them to the other's end and then saved the finished one. It converts AGAIN! Doing so back on Snow Leopard with QuickTime Player 10.0 only takes you even a few seconds only!
    Seriously, are we eating Apple or dirt this time?

    My existing movies are all the following types straight from FinalCut
    Apple Intermediate Codec, 1920 × 1080, Millions
    16-bit Integer (Little Endian), Stereo, 48.000 kHz
    This particular movie is 6.66 Gb
    The new Quicktime player in OS Mavericks converts these to the following format:
    Apple ProRes 422, 1920 x 1080
    Linear PCM, 16 bit little-endian signed integer, 2 channels, 48000 Hz
    And a movie size of 6.48 Gb
    It seems obvious from other forum posts this is a planned move so that everything is the "new mobile device" ready state/format. To use Marc Speth's post as material....
    https://discussions.apple.com/message/23749558#23749558
    this is probably about dumbing down desk top OS to that pf iPhones and iPads. This is not what I paid good money to own a Mac Book Pro for....
    Today I rolled all the back to Snow Leopard. Really good move...... All those new features hey? I lost the ability to work in spaces and of course the whole Quicktime debacle.
    The rolling back process was easy, restored from a point prior to installing Lion and Mavericks and the only issue was my iPhoto libraries. Thank my stars that I still had back ups that I had not converted yet.... viva la Mavericks...NOT. Apple can keep it.
    Unsure if you are just venting or if there is supposed to be a question here. Basically, I assumed this to be Apple's idea of an improvement. That is, I really believe the ProRes 422 codec is a better intermediate codec than the AIC codec but most of my old HDV camcorder family tapes were imported by iMovie (for compatibility with my wife's non-FCP computer configuration) and, like your content, is/remains stored as AIC/PCM MOV files. At first I thought this might be a generalized change affecting all QT X based apps but when I went to check the latest iMovie v10.0 update, became confused when I noted that AIC source files were not automatically updated to ProRes 422 and continue to play natively in the iMovie source media viewer.
    I guess this is supposed to be a logical evoluption and we were supposed to have seen the "handwriting on the wall" dating back to when Apple's first released the free ProRess "player" ProRes 422 codec. Still, it would have been nice if Apple had given some warning during the last few years so users could plan and prepare for such a drastic change. For the moment, I am just thankful that AIC remains, at least temporarily, supported nativelyby the iMovie video editor under Mavericks. Thank goodness for small favors.

  • Output the same size as the cropped video - to Quicktime

    I have cropoped and resized my video and want to export it to quicktime the same as the cropped size.
    I have tried to follow the instructions at this link, using the Crop button. I followed the instructions:  "To crop the image interactively, drag the sides or corner handles of the crop box around the source image."
    http://help.adobe.com/en_US/PremierePro/4.0/WS877FE27E-DDE6-4c35-9158-D1E1F5DEEEF2.html
    However, I don't see the "Change Output Size to automatically set the frame height and frame width of the output to the height and width of the cropped frame".  Using CS4 and exporting to quicktime 32 bit export.
    So instead of doing the crop it is exporting it at 1440 x 1080.
    Is it possible to crop and export to Quicktime?
    Thanks
    Rowby

    To further explain --
    THe crop setting in the Export Setting dialog box gives me two drop down options:
    Scale to fit
    Black Borders
    "Change Output Size" is greyed out -- even though I have the image cropped in the Export Settings "Source" tab.
    Exporting to Quicktime/Animation/32 bit 
    And in the Export Settings Video settings the width remains at the source's 1440, 1080. The "Constrain width and height" button is unchecked.  Aspect is set for D1/DV NTSC Widescreen 16.9.....
    Rowby

  • Changed sequence settings to match source footage but only half footage now matches even though they're from the same camera and same aspect ratio

    My source footage is 1920 X 1080 from a canon 60D. I changed my sequence settings to Digital SLR 1920 X 1080 to match. On the program window I have it set at "Fit". Only about a quarter of my footage now fits the program screen and looks to be the matching aspect ratio. The rest of the footage when on "fit" fills a tiny portion of the viewing window so it appears they don't match the sequence settings. I don't understand why this is happening because this footage is from the same camera, shot the same day, and have the same aspect ratios.
    Can anyone tell me why this is happening and how I can fix it??

    First of all, the setting that you mention is on Fit is the Zoom Level of the Program Monitor. It controls only how the sequence is shown in that monitor; it has nothing to do with how any sources are handled in the sequence.
    Please provide the following information:
    Exact version of Premiere Pro
    Exact version of operating system
    Graphics card and driver
    Also, please post a screenshot showing the following
    Project panel with the Video Info column visible
    the Timeline visible
    one of the problematic clips selected and the Effect Controls panel visible, with the Motion section twirled open.

  • Apple TV Keeps dropping , Just got a replacement today but does the same whats the problem

    I went today to the Apple store in Fashion Center in Las Vegas , NV . Replaced my Apple TV Box 3rd Generation 1080 P and when the technisian gave me the new one told me if you will still have the same issue contact support? What a joke so they will charge me money to talk to them.
    Well why it keeps dropping ? Just had a replacement where Apple never told any one of a recall , Apple is getting to be a cheating company and hope that a class action one day will make them pay fines of Millions of Dollars.I bought it at the Apple store and they have all my infor along with an Imac,MacBook Pro,Two Iphone 5's and an Ipad Air . Hey Thousands of Dollars spending of hard money and what Apple egnores you ? hey that is not right someone has to start a class action lawsute against them have them pay for all this.
    I am a big fan of Apple but after today I will start cutting with my Apple products and go back to Windows at lease Bill Gates never cheated on us, But still Steve Jobs was great , Unlike the CHEATER Tim Cook that even dont have a recall on his faulty products.
    I have many crashes with my Iphone 5 and my new Ipad Air and when ever i go to the Apple store there Tec people always says well you have to Reset all setting and then it will resolve the problem.I see that this is all they know, Mostly kids working there and it is not my first time that i hear this , RESTORE the Phone or the Computer or the Ipad thats all they know , They have no clue of whats going on ,I encorage you to go to Fashion Show Calleria and tell them that your Iphone keeps crashing all they will say right away Restore all settings and they did it to me but same issue presists , So today i did not want them to restore my new iPad air where the Tec Lady saw that it has crashed so many times.
    This is a real joke i Google my TV Box and saw that since 2012 they where having issues with it and no one had let us know.I kept restarting the Apple Tv till last night when it got on my nerves and Googled it and saw that there was a problem that was going on for Two years.
    So what do you guys suggest that i will do to resolve my problem,I count on you here at the forums more than counting on Apple.
    Regards
    Sam

    My experience is that the dropping connection looks like a firmware 6.x issue, whereas losing home sharing already occurred in firmware 5.x Actually, I felt that the losing home sharing problem was at least partially solved in firmware 6.x
    I also know that the home sharing issue is quite complicated and may be not related to the Apple TV at all (but more to the network / sleeping computer / iTunes).

  • Why are there no 1920 X 1080 Choices in the Sequence settings

    I watched some videos trying to understand what is the best speed and frame size to use when creating a video.  Basically Lynda.com they are saying 1920 X 1080 is full resolution and this is the desirable setting for outputting best resolution.  The aspect ratio for this is 56%.
    Also they explained the best speeds for the type of output you plan to make.  So from this I naturally expected to find a High definition 1920 X 1080 setting as a choice in setting up a new Sequence in Premier Pro.  Wrong!  To my surprise there is only one choice that will give you these setting right out of the box, What's up with the settings choices.  The recommended setting should be right there and easy to find.  Below I show the choice of AVCHD is the only obvious choice for creating a 1920 X 1080 video.  Can you guys help?

    Just to toss in my two cents worth - I don't believe any DSLR shoots 1080i, should all be progressive as 1080p or 720p. And back to the "HDV" or "Anamorphic HD" thing - with square pixels (1.0 Pixel Aspect Ratio) 1080i/p is 1920x1080 and if you divide each side of that by 120, you get 16 and 9. A 16:9 ratio between width and height (not 56% or 1.7777777 !!!!). "Anamorphic" widescreen is a way of "faking it", and saving a smaller file since less data is involved. That is how HDV works. It uses 1440x1080 pixels, and they are not square, rather they are rectangular with a 1.333 pixel aspect ratio. The pixels are wider than they are tall, and that makes up the difference so that it still plays back looking like 16:9 (IF the player respects the PAR). Simple math shows that 1440 x 1.333 = 1920! So 1440x1080 with 1.333 PAR "looks" the same as 1920x1080 with 1.0 PAR, even though 1440x1080 comes out to 4:3. Which brings up the last point, if anyone IS editing HDV footage, and wants to export to say YouTube or other other computer/tablet playback formats, do NOT export as 1440x1080 because most players will not pay attention to the PAR and the video will look like 4:3 (players wrongly assume 1.0 PAR). You will want to export as 1920x1080 with 1.0 PAR and then all is right with the world. Or take it down to 720p at 1280x720, also 16:9 with 1.0 PAR for correct playback.
    Thanks for reading and good night ;-)
    Jeff

  • James Bond movies the same as the 50th Anniversary Blu-Ray edition?

    Are the James Bond movies currently in the (Dutch) iTunes Store, the same as the 50th Anniversary Blu-Ray edition (except from the HD 720p vs 1080)?
    http://www.007.com/bond-50-on-blu-ray/

    Blu-Ray has better image quality.  Apple TV only supports content up to 8Mbps for 1080p whereas Blu-Ray can go as high as 40Mbps.
    What this means in a nutshell is that the content in iTunes is more compressed, which will have an impact with picture quality.  I won't even go in to talking about sound. 
    At the end of the day I guess it really depends on your setup and what you're looking to get out of it.  I've seen the newer content in iTunes (Sherlock Holmes: A Game of Shadows) and it looks really good.  I've also downloaded Gladiator (1080p) and it looks mediocre at best.

  • How do I arrange for the Premiere output to be as near the same as the input as possible?

    A newbie question.
    I am editing a ten minute video down to a 90 second clip, with an added jpeg and a watermark. The first (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YQ3UOlHY3GE) turned out fine in terms of HD and widescreen. The second (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wgin-kBcep8) has not – it’s all scrunched. They both started out as identical format [1920x1080, 14005kbps data rate, 14133kbps total bitrate, 50 frames/second) MP4 files; the good output format is a (1920x1080, 25920kbps data rate, 2630kbps total bitrate, 25 fps) “Movie Clip”, whereas the poor output is a (720x576, 28807kbps data rate, 30343kbps total bitrate, 25fps) “Video Clip”.
    How do I arrange it for the Premiere output to be as near the same as the input as possible, so as to present in YouTube as HD and fully widescreen? My guess is that I am doing something stupid when I open the incoming file.

    Stephen,
    In your initial post, you state:
    They both started out as identical format [1920x1080, 14005kbps data rate, 14133kbps total bitrate, 50 frames/second) MP4 files;
    If that is correct, then you ARE starting out with full-HD material, and that should be a PAR = 1.0 (Square Pixels) and 16:9 Aspect Ratio. Outputting to 1920 x 1080, should yield 16:9 with Square Pixels, as well.
    Now, one of your output tests WAS to SD, and you state:
    the poor output is a (720x576, 28807kbps data rate, 30343kbps total bitrate, 25fps) “Video Clip”.
    but there is no mention of that output file's PAR, so it could be 4:3, or 16:9. The down-rezzed Export file WILL not look as good as full HD output to full HD.
    I think that that latter 720 x 576 confused Harm, or maybe I am the one, who is confused?
    Good luck,
    Hunt

  • Why are 720p videos the same size as 1080p videos in the iTunes store?

    Normally I rent standard definition videos from the iTunes store. They are around 1.3-2GB in size.
    Today I decided to download high definition! But I am confused by the description. Although the video is available in 720p & 1080 p, the size for HD is 5.14GB. Why haven't they mentioned two sizes for HD? And how come you can't choose ?
    In my preferences I have selected "prefer 720p", but if I have to download a file that is the same size regardless of 720p vs 1080p,  then I would rather download 1080p.

    I checked a few old films and Amazon's prices match iTunes:
    Oliver Twist (1948)
    iTunes Rent £2.49 Buy £9.99
    Amazon Rent £2.49 Buy £9.99 (or on DVD for £3.70)
    Oh, Mr. Porter (1937)
    iTunes Rent £2.49 Buy £7.99
    Amazon Buy only £7.99 (or on DVD for £4.10)
    The Scarlet Pimpernel (1934)
    iTunes Rent £2.49 Buy £4.99
    Amazon Rent £2.49 Buy 4.99
    A Tale of Two Cities (1935)
    iTunes Rent £2.49 Buy £9.99
    Amazon Rent £2.49 Buy £9.99
    excepting only that for some reason you can't rent Oh, Mr. Porter on Amazon. £9.99 does seem a little excessive for The Scarlet Pimpernel. I suppose it's a 'what the market can bear' calculation.
    Interestingly:
    La Dolce Vita
    iTunes SD Rent £3.49 Buy £9.99 (HD Rent £4.49 Buy £13.99)
    Not on Amazon except as a DVD £19.99 (of course it is a three hour film), but
    Curzon Cinema (not stated if SD or HD) Rent £2.00 no purchase.

  • Mixed frame rate video clips on the same Blu-ray disc

    Before I go into the detail, this actually isn’t an issue for me, but more of a finding the answer to a different question, so please bear with me.
    To explain:  I live in the UK, and I’m forever challenged by the different native video frame rates imposed by the PAL and NTSC standards.  Every consumer camcorder I’ve ever seen only produces HD output (1920 x 1080) at either 50 fields/second interlaced, or 25 (sometimes 50) frames/second progressive.  Some action cameras (Go Pro) I possess allow me to record at 30fps progressive, in full HD, which for fast movement is simply better.  This in itself is not really a problem, but I use other software (all USA sourced) for video production whose best results are only visible when the finished HD output is 1080/60i.
    Having mixed frame rate video is a real problem for the DVD standard, but no so much for Blu-ray. Indeed Adobe Encore neatly gets around this problem, so I can actually author a Blu-ray disc which contains full HD video clips that may be either 50i or 60i.  Both types of video exist on the same disc, and when played back through a Blu-ray player/TV combination, the resultant video clips are shown correctly. Player and TV switch seamlessly to the correct setting to handle the video content.  So, I have a solution to my problem, but at the same time, a question I can’t find an answer to, which is this:
    Does the Blu-ray specification allow video clips of different native frame rates (i.e. 25fps and 30fps) assuming the resolution is the same, to co-exist on the same Blu-ray disc as a supported feature?
    It works, but I can’t find one shred of information that says what I’m doing is supported.
    Comments are most welcome.
    Regards,
    Steve

    Stan Jones wrote:
    Encore requires you to specify the project type as PAL or NTSC (whether you start it as Bluray or DVD), and does not allow you to change it later. Also, if you try to create a transcode type for PAL in an NTSC project you cannot get to the 25 fps setting (and therefore, I think, cannot do it).
    But if you import a Bluray legal 25i file to an NTSC project, it is happily added.
    DVD player conventional wisdom is that PAL players handle NTSC disks, but NTSC players do not generally handle PAL disks. I never quite understood why the TVs were not more of the issue. Do Bluray players even differentiate between PAL and NTSC?
    Even if the player will handle PAL, the TV may well not do so - so there is more going on.
    NTSC uses (generally) 60Hz systems whereas PAL is 50Hz hence the problem.
    Do not try to mix standards as it will not be allowed - however, multiple frame rates are allowed as long as they are within spec for that TV standard.
    They are best avoided though - otherwise you run a very real chance of serious asset truncation as the TV display switches between different resolutions & frame rates.

  • When I get ready to burn my dvds they tend to be blurred. Even with pictures they do the same thing. When I preview them they blur while playing. But when I stop the video it becomes crystal clear.

    When I get ready to burn my dvds they tend to be blurred. Even with pictures they do the same thing. When I preview them they blur while playing. But when I stop the video it becomes crystal clear.

    Lamontsplace
    Thanks for asking for clarification. Appreciated. I did not see you post 8 until after I posted my post 9.
    Important that we define the issue as being related to just preview or to preview and export.
    Project Preset....
    When you start a new project, a project preset (project settings) need to be set by you or the project. The program
    is designed to do that based on the properties of the first video file that you drag to the Timeline. Sometimes the program
    does it right, sometimes not. If not, then you set the project preset manually assuring that the description of the project preset
    matches your video properties for at least frame size, frame rate, etc. A major function of the project preset is to direct
    the program to give you the correct space in the Edit area monitor for editing. If you select a project preset which includes
    1920 x 1080 in its description, then the space in the Edit area monitor will reflect that 16:9 format.
    If you or the program have set the correct project preset, then, when you drag your video to the Timeline for the first time, there
    will be no colored line over its content. That means that you are getting the best possible preview in the monitor. Once you
    edit that video, you will get an orange line over it. That is the program telling you that you no longer have the best possible preview
    and to get it you Timeline render using the Render button above the Timeline. When that Timeline rendering is complete, the orange
    line turns to green. That is the program telling you that you have the best possible preview which will be in effect until you edit the
    file again. Then orange to green again.
    Right now I would prefer to stay with trying to get your photos to an acceptable preview stage. No matter what the project preset,
    these will need Timeline rendering after they are dragged to the Timeline. Several have reported that the use of the DSLR project preset results in sharper images pre and post export. I want to see if any of that can enhance your situation.
    Please review and consider and then let me know if I am going in the right direction for the explanations. I will adjust
    my instructions/suggestions accordingly.
    More later.
    Thanks again for the follow up.
    ATR

Maybe you are looking for