Is it Mandatory to include the PO charge account under Budget Organizations

Hi,
I have an doubt in PO' charge account:
The Charge account what we are using in the PO distributions Is this account combination is mandatory to include under the Budget Organization....
Regards,
Kevin.

Hi Srikanth,
Thanks for your reply..
Please find my doubt and let me know your views on the same.
Suppose if the charge account what we use in the PO is not assigned to the Budget Organization in GL responsibility, but still we can reserve the amount for this charge account. Here the conclusion is " If the charge Account is not assigned to the Budget Organization which means does the system will automatically consider the Funds Check Level as 'None' for this charge account" is it right or correct me if i am wrong? plz let me know.
Regards,
Kevin.
Edited by: user10960960 on Apr 21, 2009 6:21 AM

Similar Messages

Can I have two iPhones on the same iTunes account under the new apple terms?

I have two iPhones (4 & 3GS). Is it possible to have them using the one iTunes account or do they have to have separate accounts? I had heard that there may be a change in the apple terms so that you cannot do this, but not sure if it's true?

You can have as many iPhone and other iDevices as you want associated with your iTunes account.

Does warranty also include the wall charger?

Hi I recently bought an iPhone 5 for virgin mobile and after a couple of weeks my charging wire broke. Does Apples warranty cover the accessories or just the iPhone?

All items included in the iPhone box are covered by the same 1 year warranty.

How to delete the Calander Server account under the options tab in file sharing in your system preferences?

When I go under System Preferences-Sharing-File Sharing-Options there is an account listed called "Calender Server" that is checked. When I try to uncheck it, it asks for a password to turn it off and I don't know the password. How do I either turn this off or get rid of it?

Better still, try Apple - Support - Discussions - Mac OS X Server v10.5 Leopard.

TS3899 Apple online support fixed my yahoo mail access problem . They said yahoo service has changed and has affected connectivity. We reset the yahoo mail account under the IMAP protocol vs the POP. Thank you online support. I never would have known h

Apple online did a great job on troubleshooting my yahoo mail connectivity issue. They said yahoo has made changes that has affected mail service access. we setup yahoo mail under the IMAP protocol vs the POP. Call apple for help.

It's nice of you to share your good experience with iTunes support with the rest of us here in ASC. I'm glad that it went well for you.

PO: Error while entering Charge account in Distributions line

Hi All,
We are getting below error while creating Requisition,
+++++++++++++++++++
APP-PO-14082: A PO Charge Account is mandatory and could not be determined.
Review your account generator setup.
+++++++++++++++++++
We are getting this error after I click in Distributions line and Charge Account Field.
Please suggest where in the setup we should check for Account Generator Setup.
Thanks

Hi,
I think no need to change any thing in Account Generator, in ideal case if you setup for INV,PO and AP is complete then it picks the PO Charge Account by default. for more detail please email at [email protected]
TC

Projects Inventory Destination PO Charge Account

Hi,
Can anyone tell me, where does the PO Charge Account defaults from in case of a Project related PO with Inventory Destination.
Does it default from the Cost Group attached to the Project using PJM ?
Or does it default from the Inv Org Level ?
Regards,

Charge Account comes from Inventory Org setup and for receiving as well, In case of projects
for Inventory Items - -> It comes from inventory org setup , if you define project mfg setups as cost group as Project and Inventory and transfer of accounting to Gl (from projects or Inventory) based on the options you set the accounting is derived
for Non Inventory Items @ PO - Charge account, generally you customize the workflow PO:Default Account generator to derive the accounts
same in case on REQ as well
hope this answers
Best Regards
Krishna

Updating PO distribution charge account

Hi,
I have a requirement to update the PO charge account through PDOI or API. Is it possible?
Client do not want to update PO Account Generator. they want it through Interface.
Appreciate your responses.
Thanks,
Vara

Nagamohan,
PO is for CE's.PO dept do not want to wait till CE gets approved by finanace dept. So they'll code to default account.and pay it in AP(this is AP policy). Once CE is approved they want to reflect the actual account in Oracle. They use external system for POs. which is a not a enterprise system like Oracle. that is the problem. and our instance is multi SOB,Org and we do not want to customize any standard Oracle workflows.
seems we can not update GL charge account on the PO with any API/ or Interface.
Thanks for your time.
Regards,
Vara

BRS_BANK CHARGES ACCOUNT NOT GETTING POSTED

Hi All,
The bank charges account is not updated through FF67
i checked the configuration every thing is fine
We are using v106 transaction for bank charges
for v106 trsaction assigned to v106 posting rules
for v106 posting rules DR and CR has given
and posting rule v106 assigned to account sysmbol and account symbol assigned to bank charges accout
So i hope configuration part is fine
But i am not getting where exact the mistake done
Plz frinds help me out
Regards
Renu

Hi,
Please once again check if you have correctly assigned the GL Accounts to the relevant account symbols.
regards,
radhika

Reconciliation for the deleted user accounts on Target Resource

Hi,
I am trying to run reconciliation on a DB Table as the target resource. It is linking the user accounts that are present in the target resource.
But for the user accounts that are deleted on the target resource Reconciliation is not showing any action on the IdM user accounts under resource profile. The resource object link still shows the status "Provisioned".
Ideally when the users are deleted on the target resource User's profile, Does it require any customizations to make the resource assignment status to "revoked" instead of "Provisioned".
Any response would be of great help.
Thanks in advance.

See there could be two possibilities only:
*1) User Status Recovery via trusted Reconciliation*
Associated field in OIM responsible for it - Status field of OIM User Profile -> Check Process Definition for Xellerate User or any Trusted resource in "Reconciliation Field Mappings" section
Valid values are : Active, Disabled and Deleted
*2) Account Status Recovery via target Reconciliation*
Associated field in OIM responsible for it - OIM_OBJECT_STATUS field from Process Data Field -> Check Process Definition for Your custom resource of DB App Table in "Reconciliation Field Mappings" section
Valid values are : Enabled, Disabled and Revoked
So you are trying to achieve the second part.
Hope its clear.
Thanks
Sunny

I'm a Lightroom user and considering the CC $9.99 Plan. Is Bridge included at no charge?

Is Bridge included an no charge with the CC $9.99 Plan?

yes, bridge is included with ps (among other programs).

My iPad 3 is not charging with the supplied charger consistently

My new iPad 3 for ATT (64gb) that I just bought from the Apple refurbished store is having major charging issues. I was using my old iPad 2 Apple supplied charger and a 6ft aftermarket USB cable for the last 18 months or so with zero problems.
I plugged in my new iPad 3 the day after I got it because the one I got the day before needed to be replaced. The one I have now is from my local Apple store. I noticed after a few hours, that it displayed 72% and the NOT CHARGING display at the top. I tried several different cables (I sell them and have a few hundred), three different 10W chargers in the next 10 minutes and none would work properly. I used the wall outlet, then tried an extension cord from my UPS and then the extension cord from the wall and that didn’t work either. Several of the old chargers, including the iPhone block chargers would tease me and start working only to stop a minute later. I waited for an hour or so and tried again, the new charger and cable did charge it to 100 % from the wall outlet.
The next night, I plugged in that same 10watt original charger again from the wall at 32% and woke up 7 hours later to 58% and NOT CHARGING again. I tried the original aftermarket charger and the aftermarket 6ft cable in the wall and got it to 78% before it showed the NOT CHARGING again. I’m now at work using a third party 10w charger and a generic 6ft USB cable. It’s working so far but I don't know for how long.
I never had anything like this with my iPad 2. Does this sound familiar to anyone else? Should I take the charger and cable back to the apple store? Frankly I don’t think it’s either one but I’m grasping for any answer now. This stinks big time.

things that are normal for not charging
using iPhone chargers, using USB ports....they won't work. iPhone chargers put out 5W the iPad wants 10. Most USB's put out too little power to do anything but a trickle charge. So that part is normal.
However, out of all the combos you've tried, most of them should have worked. Make an appointment and get that refurb back to the store to be checked out.

Can you use the same charging cable for both an iPhone and an IPad or are they different? When I use the charging cable for my iPhone on my Ipad, it doesn't charge.

Can you use the same charging cable for both an iPhone and an IPad or are they different? When I use the charging cable for my iPhone on my Ipad, it doesn't charge.

The quickest way (and really the only way) to charge your iPad is with the included 10W USB Power Adapter. iPad will also charge, although more slowly, when attached to a computer with a high-power USB port (many recent Mac computers) or with an iPhone Power Adapter (5W). When attached to a computer via a standard USB port (most PCs or older Mac computers) iPad will charge very slowly (but iPad indicates not charging). Make sure your computer is on while charging iPad via USB. If iPad is connected to a computer that’s turned off or is in sleep or standby mode, the iPad battery will continue to drain.
Apple recommends that once a month you let the iPad fully discharge & then recharge to 100%.
How to Calibrate Your Mac, iPhone, or iPad Battery
http://www.macblend.com/how-to-calibrate-your-mac-iphone-or-ipad-battery/
At this link http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/galaxy-tab-android-tablet,3014-11.html , tests show that the iPad 2 battery (25 watt-hours) will charge to 90% in 3 hours 1 minute. It will charge to 100% in 4 hours 2 minutes. The new iPad has a larger capacity battery (42 watt-hours), so using the 10W charger will obviously take longer. If you are using your iPad while charging, it will take even longer. It's best to turn your new iPad OFF and charge over night. Also look at The iPad's charging challenge explained http://www.macworld.com/article/1150356/ipadcharging.html
Also, if you have a 3rd generation iPad, look at
Apple: iPad Battery Nothing to Get Charged Up About
http://allthingsd.com/20120327/apple-ipad-battery-nothing-to-get-charged-up-abou t/
Apple Explains New iPad's Continued Charging Beyond 100% Battery Level
http://www.macrumors.com/2012/03/27/apple-explains-new-ipads-continued-charging- beyond-100-battery-level/
New iPad Takes Much Longer to Charge Than iPad 2
http://www.iphonehacks.com/2012/03/new-ipad-takes-much-longer-to-charge-than-ipa d-2.html
Apple Batteries - iPad http://www.apple.com/batteries/ipad.html
Extend iPad Battery Life (Look at pjl123 comment)
https://discussions.apple.com/thread/3921324?tstart=30
New iPad Slow to Recharge, Barely Charges During Use
http://www.pcworld.com/article/252326/new_ipad_slow_to_recharge_barely_charges_d uring_use.html
Tips About Charging for New iPad 3
http://goodscool-electronics.blogspot.com/2012/04/tips-about-charging-for-new-ip ad-3.html
Prolong battery lifespan for iPad / iPad 2 / iPad 3: charging tips
http://thehowto.wikidot.com/prolong-battery-lifespan-for-ipad
 Cheers, Tom

Overbilled for a year and a half with no satisfaction, now charged new phones to charge account with the promise to switch it over immediately.

We started out as having a single plan and later changed to shared family. When we did this we ordered phones for each person; the single plan user and 3 more. When I received the phones, I couldn't get the phones set up. I called customer service and a nice guy spent over 2 hours getting everything worked out. However, they gave us 4 new phone numbers when I had told them I only needed three, the other would remain the same. So, this "nice guy" said he would change the extra phone number to a test device and I wouldn't be charged. Unfortunately I don't do the bills and only recently realized that I have been charged since day 1. That would be 20 months at 9.95! I have several times and was basically told two things, depending on the person. One person said that I needed to talk to such and such a person at a certain phone number. I got nowhere. The last time I called I received a very snide, sarcastic guy who actually laughed at me on the phone because I couldn't get anything done about the situation. He then just kept reading his script. I will be contacting the appropriate people on this fraudulent situation. I will not take this criminal bahavior anymore. On the bright side, the longer it takes them to refund my money, the better my compensation.
Now my latest ordeal with Verizon. I just ordered 4 new phones, crazy, I know! It took my two entire days trying to get these phones ordered. Finally, another nice guy helped me and after many attempts, he made the suggestion of trying a different card. I told him that my other card didn't have enough credit available for all the phones. So, he suggested we try ordering two and see if the problem was with my initial card. He told me that the card doesn't go through immediately and he could change it back to the first card right away. I asked him just before finishing the chat if I needed to take care of anything to change the charge and he said, "I told you I would take care of that". Guess what, the charge was never changed . I've made one call so far and have not gotten anywhere. Perhaps I'll just add it onto my first case and charge them for all of it at once.

<< Comment removed >> Yes, I educated myself on the cost of changing providers before I made the switch. Verizon bills all my bills one month in advance, not only on the first bill, and I was expecting the pro-rating, and agree that is not being overbilled. I know that applies to new lines as well, and am aware of the $35 data activation fee that is charged, again not overbilling. Your assumptions about my situation are incorrect. My overbilling was as follows:
1) VZ billed me for a suspension of service on a line when I exchanged a tablet I purchased from a VZ store. They even agreed that this was overbilling and refunded the charges (~$17).
2) VZ then set up a new line without my agreement for the new tablet instead of connecting it to the existing line. I was charged an additional activation fee ($35) for the second line. The tablet should have been connected to the existing line, which was unused, and for which I had already paid the $35 activation fee, this is duplicate (over) billing.
3) I contacted VZ before traveling to CAN and asked the agent to place me on a plan (prior to my trip) that would cover my phone and data usage. We agreed on the US/CAN coverage and the Global Data plan. The switch was not made correctly and I ended up only on the Global Data plan. I received a text message upon arriving in CAN, notifying me of additional charges that might apply to calls since I was out of my coverage area. I called VZ immediately and was again told that my plan was active, that the message was a mistake and that I should ignore it. The bill for that period had just under $250 of usage charges related exclusively to calls in CAN instead of the $19.95 increase to my monthly plan. Again, this is incorrect (over) billing.
4) As soon as I saw the bill referenced in #3, I called VZ and began working with (very nice) individuals in customer service. On three separate calls I was told that they could see the reference to changing my plan (in the notes) and would provide a refund within 48 hours. This never happened. On the third call I spoke with a supervisor who directed me to partially pay my bill based on a calculation of the refund he was submitting (again, to go through in 48 hours). I had the supervisor send me an email so I had evidence of his direction. After partially paying the bill, I was charged a late fee for not paying my bill in full ($5), received a message that my services might be terminated, and my next bill included ~$35 in usage fees for calls to CAN instead of $19.95 for the updated plan.
I called customer service yesterday, was again told that the refund was imminent, placed on hold so the individual could further review my bill, and after about 15 minutes the phone was picked up by a different person who had no background on my situation, which has happened on several of my calls to customer service. It was at that point that I told them I was done, leaving VZ, and was transferred to the Customer Retention specialist. After an hour and a half on the phone, I received a partial refund (just over $200), but am still owed about $70 before tax and other adjustments.
I can't imagine that any one could defend this as (1) proper billing, (2) decent customer service. I am totally happy paying my bills in full, paying the associated charges, etc., but I do not want to have to spend 4-6 hours per billing cycle on the phone with customer service trying to get my bills corrected. I also know it will probably cost me $1,500-2,000 to switch back to AT&T, plus the inconvenience. I am willing to make the switch if any further issues come up, as I simply can't spend time dealing with this every month.
Message was edited by: Verizon Moderator

How to include the first row of detail in every xquery transformed xml?

I am dealing with a XML file,where i need to publish to different BS.
First node will be a common node node which contains vital info,second node goes to one BS and third goes to another BS.
*<header></header>*
*<details></details> (they are unbounded, but the first detail tag which comes in the input file is a mandatory tag in such a way that it needs to be included in every transformed message)*
*<trailer></trailer>*
We need to apply x query transformation on it in such a way:
*</header></header>*
*<1st detail></1st detail>*
*<detail></detail> (2nd row of detail in input file)* -------------------------> Goes to BS1
*<trailer></trailer>..*
*<header></header>*
*<1st detail></1st detail>*
*<detail></detail> (3rd row of detail in input file)* ----------------------------->Goes to BS2
*<trailer></trailer>*..
And so on.
Now, the problem is how to include the first row( *1st detail* ) of detail in every xquery transformed xml?

are you looping of this input with a for each?
/yourdata/details[1] should return always the first detail element.
or before the for each do an assing of this first detail element to "generic_details_var"
and use this var in every looping iteration (in an assign or as input for xquery)

Is it Mandatory to include the PO charge account under Budget Organizations

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for