Is it mandatory to send both old and new entity type in case of update procedure?

Question

Hi,
While updating an entity, is it mandatory to send both the new entity and the old entity from the exit to the procedure?
In that case we would have to create 2 temporary tables, insert values into them and then pass the tables to the procedure? Or is there a better way?

Answer 1

Hi Ken,
I have followed the instructions on several sites on how to setup using facelets.VIEW_MAPPINGS to use both legacy JSPs and new xhtml files.
My Web.xml now looks like
<web-app>
    <context-param>
        <param-name>javax.faces.DEFAULT_SUFFIX</param-name>
         <param-value>.jsp</param-value>
    </context-param>
    <context-param>
            <param-name>facelets.VIEW_MAPPINGS</param-name>
            <param-value>*.xhtml</param-value>
    </context-param>
    <!-- Faces Servlet -->
    <servlet>
        <servlet-name>Faces Servlet</servlet-name>
        <servlet-class>javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet</servlet-class>
        <load-on-startup> 1 </load-on-startup>
    </servlet>
    <!-- Faces Servlet Mapping -->
    <servlet-mapping>
        <servlet-name>Faces Servlet</servlet-name>
        <url-pattern>*.jsf</url-pattern>
    </servlet-mapping>
    <welcome-file-list>
        <welcome-file>index.jsp</welcome-file>
    </welcome-file-list>
</web-app>
and my faces-config looks like
<faces-config>
    <application>
      <!-- tell JSF to use Facelets -->
      <view-handler>com.sun.facelets.FaceletViewHandler</view-handler>
    </application>
</faces-config>I have 2 files index.jsp AND guess.xhtml in my apps root directory.
what should my different requests look like in order to access these two resources?
http://localhost/myApp/???
I have also followed the instructions on the following page but still getting resource not available errors
http://www.mojavelinux.com/blog/archives/2006/12/partial_facelets_adoption/
Edited by: JFrain2004 on Jan 30, 2008 8:56 AM