Is it ok to apply patch with invalid Objects?--Urgent

hello,
DB: 10.1.0.3.0
Patch: P4751926
OS: Linux
I have seven invlaid objects.
Is it ok to apply patch with invalid Objects?
sys.LEAF_CATEGORY_TYP------------------------------------TYPE BODY
sys.CUSTOMER_TYP----------------------------------------------TYPE
sys.CATALOG_TYP-------------------------------------------------TYPE BODY
sys.COMPOSITE_CATEGORY_TYP-------------------------TYPE BODY
sys.DBMS_STATS---------------------------------------------------PACKAGE BODY
sys.DBMS_STATS_INTERNAL--------------------------------- PACKAGE BODY
PUBLIC.DBMS_XDBUTIL_INT------------------------------------SYNONYM
DN

did u try to recompile the invalid objects with the utlrp.sql script? (the script is under, <oracle_home>/rdbms/admin
your dbms_stats is invalid, and that package is needed for getting the statistics so better to have it valid than invalid.

Similar Messages

  • MBAM 2.5 Reports Fail with "Invalid object name 'v_GS_MBAM_POLICY'."

    Utilizing the SSRS Reports for MBAM 2.5 Integrated into Configuration Manager 2012 R2 Cu3, when I run the reports it states that the view
    'v_GS_MBAM_POLICY'  does not exist.
    The complexing thing though is that there are computers that are reporting the HINV Class called 'Win32Reg_MBAMPolicy'  So I would think this view would have been created.
    Does anyone know the process by which the view gets generated since my HINV is reporting back the information, yet the view has not been created in the DB yet... It makes no sense.
    The error is:
    Microsoft.Reporting.WinForms.ReportServerException
    An error has occurred during report processing. (rsProcessingAborted)
    Stack Trace:
       at Microsoft.Reporting.WinForms.ServerReport.ServerUrlRequest(Boolean isAbortable, String url, Stream outputStream, String& mimeType, String& fileNameExtension)
       at Microsoft.Reporting.WinForms.ServerReport.InternalRender(Boolean isAbortable, String format, String deviceInfo, NameValueCollection urlAccessParameters, Stream reportStream, String& mimeType, String& fileNameExtension)
       at Microsoft.Reporting.WinForms.AsyncMainStreamRenderingOperation.RenderServerReport(ServerReport report)
       at Microsoft.Reporting.WinForms.AsyncRenderingOperation.PerformOperation()
       at Microsoft.Reporting.WinForms.ReportViewer.AsyncReportOperationWrapper.PerformOperation()
       at Microsoft.Reporting.WinForms.ProcessingThread.ProcessThreadMain(Object arg)
    Microsoft.Reporting.WinForms.ReportServerException
    Query execution failed for dataset 'ComplianceDetails'. (rsErrorExecutingCommand)
    Stack Trace:
       at Microsoft.Reporting.WinForms.ServerReport.ServerUrlRequest(Boolean isAbortable, String url, Stream outputStream, String& mimeType, String& fileNameExtension)
       at Microsoft.Reporting.WinForms.ServerReport.InternalRender(Boolean isAbortable, String format, String deviceInfo, NameValueCollection urlAccessParameters, Stream reportStream, String& mimeType, String& fileNameExtension)
       at Microsoft.Reporting.WinForms.AsyncMainStreamRenderingOperation.RenderServerReport(ServerReport report)
       at Microsoft.Reporting.WinForms.AsyncRenderingOperation.PerformOperation()
       at Microsoft.Reporting.WinForms.ReportViewer.AsyncReportOperationWrapper.PerformOperation()
       at Microsoft.Reporting.WinForms.ProcessingThread.ProcessThreadMain(Object arg)
    Microsoft.Reporting.WinForms.ReportServerException
    Invalid object name 'v_GS_MBAM_POLICY'.
    Stack Trace:
       at Microsoft.Reporting.WinForms.ServerReport.ServerUrlRequest(Boolean isAbortable, String url, Stream outputStream, String& mimeType, String& fileNameExtension)
       at Microsoft.Reporting.WinForms.ServerReport.InternalRender(Boolean isAbortable, String format, String deviceInfo, NameValueCollection urlAccessParameters, Stream reportStream, String& mimeType, String& fileNameExtension)
       at Microsoft.Reporting.WinForms.AsyncMainStreamRenderingOperation.RenderServerReport(ServerReport report)
       at Microsoft.Reporting.WinForms.AsyncRenderingOperation.PerformOperation()
       at Microsoft.Reporting.WinForms.ReportViewer.AsyncReportOperationWrapper.PerformOperation()
       at Microsoft.Reporting.WinForms.ProcessingThread.ProcessThreadMain(Object arg)
    David Baur

    We ran into this error as well. Turns out that MBAM-provided reports to SCCM 2012 fail with an error unless the Win32Reg_MBAMPolicy class is added to SCCM, which also updates the SCCM SQL with required Views, including "v_GS_MBAM_POLICY".
    The solution that we finally came up with was to import an updated MOF file to include the BitLocker Policy (Win32Reg_MBAMPolicy) class into the "Hardware Inventory" section of the Default Client Policy. Once the import is complete SQL also gets
    the appropriate view created.
    The instructions on how to create and import the MOF file can be found in the link below.
    http://technet.microsoft.com/en-US/library/dn237295.aspx
    Chris Keene
    Product Specialist at Wave.

  • Install RAC 11gR2 and Apply Patches with OUI New Software Updates Option

    Has anyone tried the installation with the New Software Updates Option?
    I will install 11gR2 RAC Grid and I plan to do the following steps:
    1) Install Oracle Grid Infrastructure Patchset 11.2.0.2
    2) Do all the configuration with OUI
    3) Create ASM disks
    4) Install Oracle Database 11.2.0.2 Software Only
    5) Apply Oracle Recommended Patches 11.2.0.2.2 (12311357) and 12431716. (ref. MOS doc [ID 756671.1])
    6) Create RAC Database (advanced option) with DBCA
    With these steps:
    Grid and ASM disks would be configured without the recommended patches, but the database will be created with the patches applied.
    I would not like to do a "Software only" install of GI and then apply the patches because later I would have to manually do all the configuration steps.
    If I use the OUI Software Updates Option to apply the patches, will OUI do all the patching and then let me configure GRID with OUI ?
    Quote from Oracle® Grid Infrastructure Installation Guide 11g Release 2 (11.2) for Linux - Part Number E17212-11:
    " Use the Software Updates feature to dynamically download and apply software updates as part of the Oracle Database installation. You can also download the updates separately using the downloadUpdates option and later apply them during the installation by providing the location where the updates are present."
    I could not find more detailed information about this feature on documentation and MOS .
    Thanks

    Hi,
    You can download Latest Updates And Patches Using using option -downloadUpdates
    ./runInstaller -downloadUpdatesYou can use this note:
    *How To Download The Latest Updates And Patches Using 11.2.0.2 OUI [ID 1295074.1]*
    Don't miss it ..
    *Error: INS-20704 While Installing 11.2.0.2 with "Use pre-downloaded software updates" Option [ID 1265270.1]*
    Note : Please make sure that user downloading the patches updates have the proper/correct permission to download the patch updates from MOS ( My Oracle Support).
    Do not use the /tmp/oraInstall* directories for the download location. Unpublished bug 9975999
    Documentation explaining ...
    4.5.1 Running Oracle Universal Installer
    Downloading Updates Before Installation
    http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E11882_01/install.112/e16763/inst_task.htm#BABJGGJH
    Regards,
    Levi Pereira

  • [SOLVED] DWM - how do you apply patches with patch?

    I'm totally new to dwm (it's working great by the way) and patching. I'm having problems understanding how to use the patch program. The basic usage on dwm site says basically:
    patch -p1 < path/to/patch.diff
    Great, now I have the patch file ~/builds/dwn/patch/dwm-5.9-statuscolors.diff and my altered ~/builds/dwn/config.h. Here's what I did
    herman@sam ~/builds/dwm $ patch -p1 <patch/dwm-5.9-statuscolors.diff
    can't find file to patch at input line 4
    Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
    The text leading up to this was:
    |diff -up dwm-5.9/config.def.h dwm-5.9-colors/config.def.h
    |--- dwm-5.9/config.def.h 2011-07-10 16:24:25.000000000 -0400
    |+++ dwm-5.9-colors/config.def.h 2011-08-18 02:02:47.033830823 -0400
    File to patch: config.def.h
    config.def.h: No such file or directory
    Skip this patch? [y]
    Skipping patch.
    2 out of 2 hunks ignored
    can't find file to patch at input line 41
    Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option?
    The text leading up to this was:
    |Only in dwm-5.9: config.h
    |Only in dwm-5.9: dwm
    |diff -up dwm-5.9/dwm.c dwm-5.9-colors/dwm.c
    |--- dwm-5.9/dwm.c 2011-07-10 16:24:25.000000000 -0400
    |+++ dwm-5.9-colors/dwm.c 2011-08-18 02:07:20.788935100 -0400
    File to patch: dwm.c
    dwm.c: No such file or directory
    Skip this patch? [y]
    Skipping patch.
    12 out of 12 hunks ignored
    and it asks me for the filename it didn't find at line 4. Looking at the patch, I see it's a diff on config.def.h so I suppose this is the file to be patched and that I should supply this filename and the same with dwm.c? I'm not new to C coding but fresh out when it comes to diffing and patching, how do I actually go forward from here?
    Edit:
    More info  - I used the description using ABS to download the PKGBUILD for dwm and making dwm. My files
    herman@sam ~/builds/dwm $ ls -R
    PKGBUILD config.h dwm-5.9-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz dwm-5.9.tar.gz dwm.desktop dwm.install patch pkg src
    ./patch:
    dwm-5.9-statuscolors.diff
    ./pkg:
    usr
    ./pkg/usr:
    bin share
    ./pkg/usr/bin:
    dwm
    ./pkg/usr/share:
    doc licenses man xsessions
    ./pkg/usr/share/doc:
    dwm
    ./pkg/usr/share/doc/dwm:
    README
    ./pkg/usr/share/licenses:
    dwm
    ./pkg/usr/share/licenses/dwm:
    LICENSE
    ./pkg/usr/share/man:
    man1
    ./pkg/usr/share/man/man1:
    dwm.1.gz
    ./pkg/usr/share/xsessions:
    dwm.desktop
    ./src:
    config.h dwm-5.9 dwm-5.9.tar.gz dwm.desktop
    ./src/dwm-5.9:
    LICENSE Makefile README config.def.h config.def.h.orig config.def.h.rej config.h config.mk dwm dwm.1 dwm.c dwm.o
    Last edited by roygbiv (2011-12-06 20:37:40)

    Ok thanks but I'm confused again (I know..). I managed to patch the files config.def.h and dwm.c in the source dir and noticed there is yet another config.h file there as well. Now, the in the top level dir with the PKGBUILD I also have a config.h, which is the one I do my config changes. I'm confused because I now have these three header files (2x config.h + config.def.h) which are supposed to have the same source code? I've read around on the net, but haven't gotten any further answers yet. What are the purpose of each config and how should I use/update/manage them when recompiling? This is my situation:
    herman@sam ~/build/dwm $ tree .
    ├── PKGBUILD
    ├── config.h <----------------------------------------------------- this one
    ├── dwm-5.9-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz
    ├── dwm-5.9.tar.gz
    ├── dwm.desktop
    ├── dwm.install
    ├── pkg
    │   └── usr
    │   ├── bin
    │   │   └── dwm
    │   └── share
    │   ├── doc
    │   │   └── dwm
    │   │   └── README
    │   ├── licenses
    │   │   └── dwm
    │   │   └── LICENSE
    │   ├── man
    │   │   └── man1
    │   │   └── dwm.1.gz
    │   └── xsessions
    │   └── dwm.desktop
    └── src
    ├── config.h -> /home/herman/build/dwm/config.h
    ├── dwm-5.9
    │   ├── LICENSE
    │   ├── Makefile
    │   ├── README
    │   ├── config.def.h <-----------------------------------------------------this one
    │   ├── config.def.h.orig
    │   ├── config.h <----------------------------------------------------------this one
    │   ├── config.mk
    │   ├── dwm
    │   ├── dwm-5.9-statuscolors.diff
    │   ├── dwm.1
    │   ├── dwm.c
    │   ├── dwm.c.orig
    │   └── dwm.o
    ├── dwm-5.9.tar.gz -> /home/herman/build/dwm/dwm-5.9.tar.gz
    └── dwm.desktop -> /home/herman/build/dwm/dwm.desktop
    Thanks guys!
    Last edited by roygbiv (2011-12-06 20:06:10)

  • Apply image with smart object?

    What is the trick to be able to use "apply image" to a smart object? If not can someone explain the logic? Thanks

    Can't yet.

  • Web Services with Complex Objects (Urgent !!)

    Hi,
    My last post was on a problem using IBM-RAD (Service) and AXIS2 (Client) in "New to Java" Forum. That is one of the trial scenarios I'm working on nowadays. Hope, I'll get some useful reply soon.
    Now, I need a suggestion about the application I'm working upon. It is as follows:
    (i) The application (i.e. Service Class) takes some primitive,String and/or some bean object as input
    (ii) It returns a bean object [or an array (can use collection class also if possible) of bean objects].
    (iii) The bean properties are primitive,String , other bean objects, and/or some collection object(Vector / ArrayList etc.) i.e. it should handle complex objects.
    (iv) The Service should run on Websphere and Client on Tomcat.
    A pictorial representation is given below:
    [primitive/String/bean object (Input arg)]
    [(Contains  primitive/String/other bean objects/collection class)] Bean <---------> Service <----------------------- Client
    [Calls bean] |===============> Client
    [Returns bean (or array of beans / collection object)]
    I'm now trying (by building test applications) a combination of IBM-RAD (Service) and AXIS2 (Client), but facing problems in handling array of beans and/or collection classes either on Service or on the Client side.
    So, I need some suggestions on whether I'm going the right way, or need to change my approach (or technology). Any suggestion would be appreciated.
    Please reply ASAP, it is urgent.
    Thanks in advance,
    Suman

    no problem for me, so it's not urgent.
    Request for help denied.

  • Sap ecc6.0 instalation error invalid objects

    Hi,
    we tried to install SAP IDES (SAP ERP 2005 SR 2) on a Windows 2003 server service pack 1 as Database we use for oracle 10g.
    Everything went fine until the step "ABAP Import (Step 19)" after that the following error occurs:
    Not all objects are successfully processed. DIAGNOSIS: For details see output file with invalid objects invalid_objects.txt and log file object_checker.log. SOLUTION: Normally it indicates the data load error but in some special cases (for example if some objects were created or loaded externally) you can press OK to continue.
    checkObjectsdbType=ORA
    strDirs=D:\Dump\export1\EXP1\DATA;D:\Dump\expo rt2\EXP2\DATA;D:\Dump\export3\EXP3\DATA;D:\Dump\expor t4\EXP4\DATA;D:\Dump\export5\EXP5\DATA;D:\Dump\expor t6\EXP6\DATA;D:\Dump\export6\EXP7\DATA;D:\Dump\expor t6\EXP8\DATA;D:\Dump\export6\EXP9\DATA;D:\Dump\expor t6\EXP10\DATA;D:\Dump\export6\EXP11\DATA
    trace=all
    tskDir=C:\Program Files\sapinst_instdir\ERP\SYSTEM\ORA\CENTRAL\AS

    hi ,
    Here i am pasting log file.
    INFO: 2020-01-24 08:19:50
    Object Checker is started.
    CONFIG: 2020-01-24 08:19:50
    Application options:
    checkObjects=
    dbType=ORA
    strDirs=E:\ecc6\export1\EXP1\DATA;E:\ecc6\export2\EXP2\DATA;E:\ecc6\export3\EXP3\DATA;E:\ecc6\export4\EXP4\DATA;E:\ecc6\export5\EXP5\DATA;E:\ecc6\export6\EXP6\DATA;E:\ecc6\export6\EXP7\DATA;E:\ecc6\export6\EXP8\DATA;E:\ecc6\export6\EXP9\DATA;E:\ecc6\export6\EXP10\DATA;E:\ecc6\export6\EXP11\DATA
    trace=all
    tskDir=C:\PROGRA1\SAPINS1\ERP\SYSTEM\ORA\CENTRAL\AS
    CONFIG: 2020-01-24 08:19:50
    List of packages with table structure: 'SAP0000'.
    INFO: 2020-01-24 08:19:50
    19 packages found in 'E:\ecc6\export1\EXP1\DATA;E:\ecc6\export2\EXP2\DATA;E:\ecc6\export3\EXP3\DATA;E:\ecc6\export4\EXP4\DATA;E:\ecc6\export5\EXP5\DATA;E:\ecc6\export6\EXP6\DATA;E:\ecc6\export6\EXP7\DATA;E:\ecc6\export6\EXP8\DATA;E:\ecc6\export6\EXP9\DATA;E:\ecc6\export6\EXP10\DATA;E:\ecc6\export6\EXP11\DATA' directories.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:50 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (ADA) index 'MAPR~ADQ' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL0' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:50 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (!MSS) index 'MLST~1' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL0' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:50 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (MSS) index 'MLST~1AD' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL0' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:50 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (!MSS) index 'MLST~2' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL0' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:50 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (MSS) index 'MLST~2AD' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL0' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:50 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (!MSS) index 'MLST~4' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL0' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:50 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (MSS) index 'MLST~4AD' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL0' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:51 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (ADA) index 'PLMK~ADQ' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL0' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:51 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (MSS) index 'SEMPLOYES~ARE' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL0' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:51 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (MSS) index 'SEMPLOYES_APP~ARE' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL0' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:51 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (MSS) index 'SEMPLOYES_RB~ARE' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL0' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:51 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (MSS) index 'SEMPLOYES_TI~ARE' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL0' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:51 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (MSS) index 'SEMPLOY_CSH~ARE' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL0' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:51 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (MSS) index 'SEMPLOY_SEARCH~ARE' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL0' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:51 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (MSS) index 'STXH~TDN' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL0' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:52 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (ADA) index 'BBSID~ADQ' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL1' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:52 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (ADA) index 'BSID~ADQ' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL1' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:52 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (DB6) index 'DB6CSTRACE~1' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL1' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:52 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (ADA) index 'KBED~3' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL1' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:52 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (ADA) index 'KBED~4' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL1' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:52 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (ADA) index 'NAST~ADQ' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL1' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:52 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (ADA) index 'S003~ADQ' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL1' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:52 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (ADA) index 'S003BIW1~ADQ' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL1' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:52 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (ADA) index 'S003BIW2~ADQ' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL1' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:52 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (ADA) index 'S004~ADQ' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL1' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:52 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (ADA) index 'S004BIW1~ADQ' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL1' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:52 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (ADA) index 'S004BIW2~ADQ' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL1' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:52 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (ADA) index 'S006~ADQ' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL1' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:52 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (ADA) index 'S006BIW1~ADQ' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL1' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:52 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (ADA) index 'S006BIW2~ADQ' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL1' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:52 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (ADA) index 'S011~ADQ' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL1' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:52 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (ADA) index 'S011BIW1~ADQ' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL1' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:52 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (ADA) index 'S011BIW2~ADQ' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL1' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:52 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (ADA) index 'S012~ADQ' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL1' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:52 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (ADA) index 'S012BIW1~ADQ' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL1' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:52 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (ADA) index 'S012BIW2~ADQ' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL1' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:52 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (ADA) index 'S013~ADQ' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL1' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:52 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (ADA) index 'S013BIW1~ADQ' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL1' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:52 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (ADA) index 'S013BIW2~ADQ' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL1' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:52 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (ADA) index 'S031~ADQ' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL1' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:52 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (ADA) index 'S032~ADQ' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL1' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:53 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Database specific (DB6) index 'VARIS~DB6' found in STR file for 'SAPAPPL2' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:54 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Data load must be skipped for table 'DBPROPERTIES' from STR file for 'SAPSDIC' package.
    TRACE: 2020-01-24 08:19:54 com.sap.inst.migcheck.object.ObjectCheckTask collectPackageObjects
    Data load must be skipped for table 'DDLOG' from STR file for 'SAPSPROT' package.
    ERROR: 2020-01-24 08:19:55
    1 objects have error/ignore/execute or unknown status in the task lines.
    Invalid objects are saved in 'invalid_objects.txt' file.
    INFO: 2020-01-24 08:19:55
    Object Checker is stopped.
    please see and tell where is the problem and how i can resolve it.
    thanks , vikas

  • Apply Patches on Oracle Database with Logical Standby Database

    Here I am:
    I got a primary database with a logical standby database running Oracle 11g. I got two client applications, one is the production site pointing to the primary one, another one is just a backup site pointing to the logical one.Things will only be written into the primary database every mid night and client applications can only query the database but not add, update nor delete.And now, I want to apply the latest patch on both of my databases. I am also the DNS administrator, I can make the name server pointing to the backup site instead of the production one.I want to firstly apply the patch on the logical one, and then the physical one.
    I found some reference which explains how to apply patches by adopting "Rolling Upgrade Method". however, I want to avoid doing any "switch over" mentioned in the reference because I can make use of name server. Can I just apply patches as the following way?
    1)Stop SQL apply
    2)Apply patches on logical standby database
    3)let the name server point to the backup site
    4)Apply patches on the primary database
    5)Start SQL apply
    6)Let the name server point back to the production site
    Thanks in advance.

    Pl follow the steps in MOS Doc 437276.1 ( Upgrading Oracle Database with a Logical Standby Database In Place )
    HTH
    Srini

  • Invalid object after applying fa patch

    Dear all,
    Just now I had applied patch for FA & Generate message files from Generate Applications Files menu. How do I know that there are any invalid objects for FA after applying patch in order for me to run Compile APPS schema from adadmin to compile the invalid objects. What is the example for the invalid object message? What is the effect if I run Compile APPS schema eventhough there are no invalid object occur? Please advices.

    HI,
    Below is my last message after compiling the APPS Schema
    ======================================
    There are now 1 jobs remaining (current phase=pc_errchk):
    0 running, 1 ready to run and 0 waiting.
    Assigned: file aderrchk.sql on worker 1 for product ad username APPLSYS.Spawned Process 29807
    Completed: file aderrchk.sql on worker 1 for product ad username APPLSYS.
    Done compiling APPS schema(s) in parallel.
    Telling workers to quit...
    All workers have quit.
    Dropping FND_INSTALL_PROCESSES table...
    FND_INSTALL_PROCESSES table dropped.
    Dropping AD_DEFERRED_JOBS table...
    AD_DEFERRED_JOBS table dropped.
    Please check your log files for errors that may have occurred
    while compiling invalid objects.
    Be sure to look at the log file(s) for the parallel worker(s) which ran
    adpcpcln.pls and aderrchk.sql. These scripts display compilation errors
    and list objects which are still invalid.
    sqlplus -s APPS/***** @/test/oracle/testappl/ad/11.5.0/admin/sql/adinvrst.pls *****
    Spawned Process 29850
    Review the messages above, then press [Return] to continue.
    ===========================================
    I had run select owner, object_type, object_name from dba_objects where status = 'INVALID' order by 1,2; once again to look for an INVALID object but the INVALID object still appear.
    Please advice. Do I need to run compile APPS Schema once again?

  • Opatch failed with error code 74 while applying patch 5191377

    hi,
    grid10g@appsnet6 5191377]$ opatch apply
    Invoking OPatch 10.2.0.1.6
    Oracle Interim Patch Installer version 10.2.0.1.6
    Copyright (c) 2007, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
    Oracle Home : /U00010.00/Grid/db10g
    Central Inventory : /etc/oraInventory
    from : /etc/oraInst.loc
    OPatch version : 10.2.0.1.6
    OUI version : 10.2.0.1.0
    OUI location : /U00010.00/Grid/db10g/oui
    Log file location : /U00010.00/Grid/db10g/cfgtoollogs/opatch/opatch2008-05-29_17-34-00PM.log
    ApplySession applying interim patch '5191377' to OH '/U00010.00/Grid/db10g'
    Running prerequisite checks...
    Prerequisite check "CheckApplicable" failed.
    The details are:
    Patch 5191377: Required component(s) missing : [ oracle.sysman.repository.core, 10.2.0.1.0 ]
    ApplySession failed during prerequisite checks: Prerequisite check "CheckApplicable" failed.
    System intact, OPatch will not attempt to restore the system
    OPatch failed with error code 74
    Please help mee

    hi,
    Thanks for the replyy
    here is the log
    SEVERE:OPatch invoked as follows: 'apply '
    INFO:
    Oracle Home : /U00010.00/Grid/db10g
    Central Inventory : /etc/oraInventory
    from : /etc/oraInst.loc
    OPatch version : 10.2.0.1.6
    OUI version : 10.2.0.1.0
    OUI location : /U00010.00/Grid/db10g/oui
    Log file location : /U00010.00/Grid/db10g/cfgtoollogs/opatch/opatch2008-05-29_17-34-00PM.log
    INFO:Starting ApplySession at Thu May 29 17:34:01 IST 2008
    INFO:Starting Apply Session at Thu May 29 17:34:01 IST 2008
    INFO:ApplySession applying interim patch '5191377' to OH '/U00010.00/Grid/db10g'
    INFO:Starting to apply patch to local system at Thu May 29 17:34:01 IST 2008
    INFO:Start the Apply initScript at Thu May 29 17:34:01 IST 2008
    INFO:Finish the Apply initScript at Thu May 29 17:34:01 IST 2008
    INFO:Patch 5191377 has no conflicts/superset wiht any other patch processed till now
    INFO:Checking conflicts for patch: 5191377
    INFO:Checking conflicts/supersets for patch: 5191377 with patch:5191377
    INFO:
    Running prerequisite checks...
    INFO:Space Needed : 629324
    INFO:Prereq checkPatchApplicableOnCurrentPlatform Passed for patch : 5191377
    INFO:Prereq checkComponents failed. So, checkApplicable returning without execution.
    INFO:Prerequisite check "CheckApplicable" failed.
    The details are:
    Patch 5191377: Required component(s) missing : [ oracle.sysman.repository.core, 10.2.0.1.0 ]
    SEVERE:OUI-67074:ApplySession failed during prerequisite checks: Prerequisite check "CheckApplicable" failed.
    INFO:System intact, OPatch will not attempt to restore the system
    INFO:Finishing ApplySession at Thu May 29 17:34:04 IST 2008
    INFO:Total time spent waiting for user-input is 0 seconds. Finish at Thu May 29 17:34:04 IST 2008
    INFO:Stack Description: oracle.opatch.PrereqFailedException: Prerequisite check "CheckApplicable" failed.
    INFO:StackTrace: oracle.opatch.OPatchSessionHelper.runApplyPrereqs(OPatchSessionHelper.java:3435)
    INFO:StackTrace: oracle.opatch.ApplySession.processLocal(ApplySession.java:3529)
    INFO:StackTrace: oracle.opatch.ApplySession.process(ApplySession.java:5238)
    INFO:StackTrace: oracle.opatch.OPatchSession.main(OPatchSession.java:1544)
    INFO:StackTrace: oracle.opatch.OPatch.main(OPatch.java:570)
    INFO:File "/U00010.00/Grid/db10g/.patch_storage/patch_unzip" cannot be deleted as it does not exist
    ~
    ~
    ~
    ~
    ~
    "/U00010.00/Grid/db10g/cfgtoollogs/opatch/opatch2008-05-29_17-34-00PM.log" [readonly] 38L, 2292C
    Regards,
    Pradeep

  • OPatch failed with error code 74 when applying patch PSE 13723798

    Hello all,
    tried to apply patch (PSE 13723798) to fix the no-scrollbar bug in Webcenter Portal Admin Console. But found this error during the patching process, as described below. Any solution for this?
    Running prerequisite checks. . .
    Patch 13723798: Optional component (s) missing : [ oracle.webcenter.framework, 11.1.1.4.0, higher version 11.1.1.5.0 found. ]
    Prerequisite check "CheckApplicable failed.
    The details are:
    Patch "13723798" is a no-op patch.
    ApplySession failed during the prerequisite checks: Prerequisite check "CheckApplicable" failed.
    System intact, OPatch will not attempt to restore the system
    OPatch failed with error code 74

    Okay, I'll try it on VM.
    Anyway, here is the result running command: opatch lsinventory
    [oracle@CDJWPS01 13723798]$ opatch lsinventory
    Invoking OPatch 11.1.0.8.3
    Oracle Interim Patch Installer version 11.1.0.8.3
    Copyright (c) 2010, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
    Oracle Home : /opt/app/Oracle/Middleware/Oracle_WC1
    Central Inventory : /home/oracle/oraInventory
    from : /etc/oraInst.loc
    OPatch version : 11.1.0.8.3
    OUI version : 11.1.0.9.0
    OUI location : /opt/app/Oracle/Middleware/Oracle_WC1/oui
    Log file location : /opt/app/Oracle/Middleware/Oracle_WC1/cfgtoollogs/opatch/opatch2013-05-31_20-43-34PM.log
    Patch history file : /opt/app/Oracle/Middleware/Oracle_WC1/cfgtoollogs/opatch/opatch_history.txt
    OPatch detects the Middleware Home as "/opt/app/Oracle/Middleware"
    Lsinventory Output file location : /opt/app/Oracle/Middleware/Oracle_WC1/cfgtool
    logs/opatch/lsinv/lsinventory2013-05-31_20-43-34PM.txt
    Installed Top-level Products (1):
    Oracle WebCenter Suite 11g 11.1.1.5.0
    There are 1 products installed in this Oracle Home.
    There are no Interim patches installed in this Oracle Home.
    OPatch succeeded.

  • OPatch failed with error code 73 while applying patch 5191377

    hi,
    while applying patch 5191377
    i got the following error
    Oracle interim Patch Installer version 10.2.0.1.0
    Copyright (c) 2005, Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved..
    Oracle Home : /U00010.00/Grid/db10g
    Central Inventory : /etc/oraInventory
    from : /U00010.00/Grid/db10g/oraInst.loc
    OPatch version : 10.2.0.1.0
    OUI version : 10.2.0.1.0
    OUI location : /U00010.00/Grid/db10g/oui
    Log file location : /U00010.00/Grid/db10g/cfgtoollogs/opatch/opatch-2008_May_29_15-36-47-IST_Thu.log
    ApplySession applying interim patch '5191377' to OH '/U00010.00/Grid/db10g'
    Apply Session failed: ApplySession failed to prepare the system. ApplySession: Required component(s) [ oracle.sysman.repository.core, 10.2.0.1.0 ] not present in the Oracle Home or a higher version found.
    System intact, OPatch will not attempt to restore the system
    OPatch failed with error code 73
    can anyone please help to solve this issue....
    Regards
    Pradeep

    hi,
    Please find the log
    SEVERE:OPatch invoked as follows: 'apply '
    INFO:
    Oracle Home : /U00010.00/Grid/db10g
    Central Inventory : /etc/oraInventory
    from : /etc/oraInst.loc
    OPatch version : 10.2.0.1.6
    OUI version : 10.2.0.1.0
    OUI location : /U00010.00/Grid/db10g/oui
    Log file location : /U00010.00/Grid/db10g/cfgtoollogs/opatch/opatch2008-05-29_17-34-00PM.log
    INFO:Starting ApplySession at Thu May 29 17:34:01 IST 2008
    INFO:Starting Apply Session at Thu May 29 17:34:01 IST 2008
    INFO:ApplySession applying interim patch '5191377' to OH '/U00010.00/Grid/db10g'
    INFO:Starting to apply patch to local system at Thu May 29 17:34:01 IST 2008
    INFO:Start the Apply initScript at Thu May 29 17:34:01 IST 2008
    INFO:Finish the Apply initScript at Thu May 29 17:34:01 IST 2008
    INFO:Patch 5191377 has no conflicts/superset wiht any other patch processed till now
    INFO:Checking conflicts for patch: 5191377
    INFO:Checking conflicts/supersets for patch: 5191377 with patch:5191377
    INFO:
    Running prerequisite checks...
    INFO:Space Needed : 629324
    INFO:Prereq checkPatchApplicableOnCurrentPlatform Passed for patch : 5191377
    INFO:Prereq checkComponents failed. So, checkApplicable returning without execution.
    INFO:Prerequisite check "CheckApplicable" failed.
    The details are:
    Patch 5191377: Required component(s) missing : [ oracle.sysman.repository.core, 10.2.0.1.0 ]
    SEVERE:OUI-67074:ApplySession failed during prerequisite checks: Prerequisite check "CheckApplicable" failed.
    INFO:System intact, OPatch will not attempt to restore the system
    INFO:Finishing ApplySession at Thu May 29 17:34:04 IST 2008
    INFO:Total time spent waiting for user-input is 0 seconds. Finish at Thu May 29 17:34:04 IST 2008
    INFO:Stack Description: oracle.opatch.PrereqFailedException: Prerequisite check "CheckApplicable" failed.
    INFO:StackTrace: oracle.opatch.OPatchSessionHelper.runApplyPrereqs(OPatchSessionHelper.java:3435)
    INFO:StackTrace: oracle.opatch.ApplySession.processLocal(ApplySession.java:3529)
    INFO:StackTrace: oracle.opatch.ApplySession.process(ApplySession.java:5238)
    INFO:StackTrace: oracle.opatch.OPatchSession.main(OPatchSession.java:1544)
    INFO:StackTrace: oracle.opatch.OPatch.main(OPatch.java:570)
    INFO:File "/U00010.00/Grid/db10g/.patch_storage/patch_unzip" cannot be deleted as it does not exist
    ~
    ~
    ~
    ~
    ~
    "/U00010.00/Grid/db10g/cfgtoollogs/opatch/opatch2008-05-29_17-34-00PM.log" [readonly] 38L, 2292C

  • Urgent help needed while applying patch for upgrade with conflicts

    I try to upgrade 11.2.0.2 to 11.2.0.3 on LInux environment.
    I have to apply patch P1253900 before the upgrade per oracle doc.
    however I got following conflict:
    Verifying environment and performing prerequisite checks...
    Checking skip_duplicate
    Checking skip_subset
    Conflicts/Supersets for each patch are:
    Patch : 12539000
    Conflict with 12827726
    Conflict details:
    /u01/app/grid/product/11.2.0/grid/lib/libserver11.a:/ksxp.o
    Following patches have conflicts: [   12827726   12539000 ]
    Refer to My Oracle Support Note 1299688.1 for instructions on resolving patch conflicts.
    I checked above oracle note, and did not say any resolution.
    If anybody had the same issue before, please help me with the resolution.
    Thanks in advance.

    Follow the steps in this MOS Doc
    Database Patch conflict resolution [ID 1321267.1]
    This MOS Doc is referenced in 1299688.1
    HTH
    Srini

  • Invalid package WWSBR_IMT_SERVICES after apply patch 3.0.9.8.1

    After applying patch 3.0.9.8.1, get an invalid package.
    Upon trying to compile the package WWSBR_IMT_SERVICES the following error
    occurs
    SQL> show err
    Errors for PACKAGE BODY WWSBR_IMT_SERVICES:
    291/7 PL/SQL: Statement ignored
    291/20 PLS-00201: identifier 'CTX_DOC.PKENCODE' must be declared
    293/8 PL/SQL: Statement ignored
    293/21 PLS-00201: identifier 'CTX_DOC.PKENDCODE' must be declare
    We have NOT installed oracle intermedia... why is this error occuring?

    According to BUG 2120388 this is ok!

  • Issue with updation of PAN details in ESS after applying patch

    Hi ,
    We have applied a new patch recently,
    as follows:
    SAP_HR - To patch - 49
    EA_HR - To Patch - 49
    When users are trying to update PAN details it says throwing error " fill in the required fields,"
    i tried to apply relevent note :1243216 , but iam not able to apply it as system says it cannot be implemeted.
    Can any body come accross this issue please give me solution as this issue has become critical.
    Thanks in advance .
    Regards,
    Evani

    Duplicate post.
    After applying patch , error found on bottom of signon screen
    After applying patch , error found on bottom of signon screen

Maybe you are looking for

  • CR2011 - Subreport has no borders and should

    In CR2011, I have a report that has a subreport as part of it. The subreport "frame" in the parent report is defined as having a border on all 4 sides, but when the report comes u, there is no border. Can someone tell me what I'm doing wrong? Thanks!

  • What is the use of Task Flow Call?

    Hi, Usually we can call bounded task flow from unbounded task flow. What is the use of Task flow call? How is it different from calling in normal way? Can anyone please explain me? Thank you, Srini

  • IPhone 4 Thetimes.co.uk crashes when loading in safari

    I am a UK iPhone 4 owner and I wanted to see how well the retina display faired with TheTimes.co.uk but as the loading bar got to the co part of the URL it crashed, but safari was still running in the background but I opened it only to take me back t

  • .swf files opening issues

    Upon opening .swf files I get open or save as options. I have tried all the fixes I could locate nothing is helping. I have even tried to reinstall the flash player program. I can play the files from the site but after downloading them I can no longe

  • Sorting the contents of a listbox

    Here is a real LabVIEW challenge: Sort the contents of a MULTICOLUMN LISTBOX after clicking on any of the column headers. I have no trouble doing this for a TABLE, because there the edit-position can be read through a property node and action is taki