Is it possible to clear a BLOCK (not data) after performing a test?

I am looking for a way to clear blocks conditionally within a CSC, not universally based on a FIX. CLEARBLOCK does not work in IF statements. :(
Any ideas?

You can always use MaxL's restructure command to remove blocks completely from the .IND (just the pointers) and .PAG (the actual blocks) and defragment. Although restructure is single threaded, in my limited testing I find that it's about as fast as parallel export, clear, load, and agg.
CLEARBLOCK ALL will remove the blocks from a calc engine perspective, but the blocks will be (I think) marked as dead and still really there in the .PAG file.
Regards,
Cameron Lackpour
Edited by: CL on Nov 10, 2011 10:30 AM
Sorry, forgot to add, you nee to the CLEARBLOCK ALL outside of the IF. You might be able to get away with some kind of FIX to do it. If it truly needs to be tested to be cleared, you are out of luck.

Similar Messages

  • I have lost all my notes data after restore. Anyone know how to retrieve notes after restore?

    I have lost all my notes data after restore. Anyone know how to retrieve notes after restore?
    I havent' took any backup of my notes in icloud. The moment I enter the password after restore my notes will be empty. The only option to get notes back is that after restore skip entering icloud password. But any time I enter icloud password anywhere again my notes will be empty. I have huge data saved in my notes. Apple need to look into this issues very seriously. This is the 5th time I restoring my iphone today just to get my note back.

    I have the issue with losing all my notes and I don't even know why.  I can't remember changing any email account info.  What happened to them?
    Ipad 3rd io7
    Please Help!
    Thank you,
    S.

  • Content block not saved after restart firefox in windows 7

    We know there is an option to block content like images by right click on it and select "block images from xxx.xxx.com", first time it worked and checked it from the menu, tools-options-content-exception (load images automatically) and the item is there. But After restart firefox its gone. dont know why? Pls help. (all other setting is ok and saved).
    Using Windows 7 Ult, Firefox 3.
    == This happened ==
    Every time Firefox opened

    Yes, I used clear recent history, with Site Preferences. Dose this anything to do with it?

  • Anti-phishing, anti-malware site blocking not working after settings to enable

    Tried the anti-phishing and anti-malware test pages with correct security settings as directed; they both load fine--which they shouldn't!

    I would purchase a recover disk set from HP or an HP Partner.
    Is was sold with a recovery partition capable of producing a set of recovery disks. When it was set up, the notebook asked if you were ready to make a set of recovery disks. Unfortunately, it would have been less expensive to pay attention to what it said. A disk set will cost around $20-30.00.
    ****Please click on Accept As Solution if a suggestion solves your problem. It helps others facing the same problem to find a solution easily****
    2015 Microsoft MVP - Windows Experience Consumer

  • Clearing out old process data

    How can I clear out old process data? In my test environment, I have several hung tasks that will not terminate. The tasks exist, but the process they were associated with no longer do.

    There was a bug in 8.0 that I believe is fixed in 8.2 where tasks assigned to a group were not removed when the process was terminated.
    Your easiest solution right now is:
    - create a dummy local user called "dummy" or something like that
    - go into adminui/process management/task management, find the tasks, and allocate them to the dummy user.
    They will still be there, but at least they won't irritate anyone.
    Howard
    http://www.avoka.com

  • FBRA-Document includes already cleared items - reversal not possible

    While reset and reversal using FBRA I am getting the following error. Please do let me know if any clue to resolve this issue.
    Document includes already cleared items - reversal not possible
    Message no. F5 308
    Diagnosis
    A reverse posting clears all line items that are managed as open items. This is not possible if one of the items in question has already been cleared by another method.
    System Response
    Error message.
    Procedure
    If you really want to reverse the document with the number you specified, display the cleared items and reset all those items for which you can find clearing document numbers. Then repeat the reverse transaction.

    Hi Dewang,
    Thanks for your quick responce.
    step 01- Posted Customer Invoice on 01-Jan-2011with RV doc with Rs-1200: Doc 111111
    Step 02- Posted Customer downpayment on 01-Jan-2011 with DZ doc with Rs-1200: Doc No 2222222
    Step 03- Clear Customer line items on 10-Jan-2011 with AB doc with Doc no- 3333333
    Trying to reverse Cleared Item (i.e. Doc No 3333333) with T-Code FBRA. While doing Reset and reversal we are getting the above problem.
    Please let me know if you need any information.
    Regards
    Raj

  • Document is alrady contains cleared items-reversal not possible

    Hi All,
    At the time of MIRO reversal we are getting error massage Document is already contains cleared items-reversal not possible
    actually one MIRO document using TDS line item and we make a payment for that TDS line item after that we try to reserve MIRO document that time we are getting error massage.
    Please help me to resolve this issue.
    Regards,
    juhi

    Hi Spradip & Minesh,
    Thanks
    But as per my client they do the same in system but this document only not getting reveres why they don't know.
    but what we do because they want to reverse the document.
    Please help me
    Thanks & Regards,
    Juhi

  • MR8M-Document already contains cleared items - reversal not possible

    Hi Gurus,
    I am getting error message Document XXXXX 1000 2014 already contains cleared items - reversal not possible while cancelling IR via Tcode MR8M.
    Invoice was already paid twice by mistake hence we are trying to cancel via MR8M.
    I know we can do via FBRA by resetting the cleared item but is there any other options or workaround?
    Thanks,
    Kumar

    Hi Jurgen,
    Thanks for your reply;
    Invoice posted twice and 1 needs to be reversed. Please refer the attached screenshot.
    Thanks,

  • Good issue from delivery not possible due to credit block

    Hi gurus,
    Please help me on this issue.while doing PGI for the delivery i am getting the following error message."Good issue from delivery not possible due to credit block "The simple credit check is assigned for the sales document type.iam doing free of charge delivery.
    What are all the possible ways to get such error
    Regards
    Vis

    but system behavior is not set in transaction OVA8, means combination of risk categories and 03 is not set.
    I think you are checking the wrong risk category, please check once again the Risk category of the payer in FD32, what is it assigned and also check OVA8 with this risk category.
    If you find the above settings are correct as per your observation, try to create a fresh cycle so that you will get the correct results as per your settings in delivery.
    In your case what you are saying is correct, may be the risk category is changed recently this you can check the change log of the payer customer in FD32( if any change takes place).
    If possible try to past the screen shot of both.
    thanks,
    srinu.

  • JWSDP 1.6 xws-security Simple fails with "block not properly padded"

    Environment:
    - Windows 2000
    - Tomcat50-jwsdp
    - JAVA_HOME=C:/Progra~1/Java/jdk1.5.0_05
    - Security environment handler: SecurityEnvironmentHandler.java supplied with JWSDP 1.6 (Hello, Ron!)
    I get the following in the Tomcat Window:
    ==== Received Message End ====
    Nov 13, 2005 10:38:56 AM com.sun.org.apache.xml.internal.security.encryption.XMLCipher decryptKey
    INFO: Decryption of key type http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#tripledes-cbc OK
    Nov 13, 2005 10:38:56 AM com.sun.xml.wss.impl.apachecrypto.DecryptionProcessor decryptElementWithCipher
    SEVERE: WSS_ENC0004: Exception [ Given final block not properly padded ] while trying to decrypt message
    Nov 13, 2005 10:38:56 AM com.sun.xml.wss.impl.filter.DumpFilter process
    INFO: ==== Sending Message Start ====
    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <env:Envelope xmlns:env="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:enc="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/enco
    ding/" xmlns:ns0="http://xmlsoap.org/Ping" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.or
    g/2001/XMLSchema-instance">
    <env:Body>
    <env:Fault>
    <faultcode xmlns:ans1="http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-wssecurity-secext-1.0.xsd">ans1:Fail
    edCheck</faultcode>
    <faultstring>Unable to decrypt message</faultstring>
    </env:Fault>
    </env:Body>
    </env:Envelope>
    ==== Sending Message End ====
    Please help!
    George

    Hi, I got the xws-security/samples/simple application
    working successfully with my own keystores. I have 2
    questions regarding this sample application.
    1) When running the application with the
    encrypt-server.xml and encrypt-client.xml
    configuration, why is it necessary to import the
    client's certificate into the server's truststore and
    the server's certificate into client's truststore when
    their certificates have already been signed by a
    trusted root CA (e.g. Verisign), whose certificate is
    in both truststores? Shouldn't their certificates
    containing their public keys get automatically
    exchanged during the connection request? It's a pain
    to publish a web service and expect a manual public
    certificate import for each client wanting to use the
    service.Certificates are sent only when the keyReferenceType is "Direct" which is the default. It's possible that our code is checking the certificate sent with one found in the KeyStore, but a quick scan of the code doesn't show it. If that's what's happening it's a bug. All of the other key reference strategies send only a referece to the sender's certificate in which case the reciever must have a copy of that certificate in its keystore.
    2) I use Tomcat to run the sample application and did
    set up the SSL connector to point to the keystores.
    When the client connects to the server, it uses a
    http endpoint not https. I'm aware that htpps is
    needed for SSL support but not clear on where does
    https come into play during the client's
    request/server's response process.We share the SSL keystore so that certificates don't have to be stored in more than one place. The functionality of XWS-Security and SSL is logically the same so it make sense to use the same keystore. XWS-Security operates completely separately from the transport and never knows whether HTTPS is in use or not.
    Phil Goodwin
    Technical Lead
    XWS-Security

  • Possible to clear vendor open item against already posted payment document?

    Hi
    Can you advise if it is possible to clear an open item against already posted payment/clearing doc? Here is the background to the scenario:
    An invoice was posted with transaction FB60. This was subsequently picked up in the payment run F110 and cleared by payment document number 200005678. The item went to the bank on the paymnet file and was paid out to the vendor. The transaction reference, which appeared on the incoming bank statemnet was the payment document number 200005678.
    Subsequently it was discovered that the original invoice should have been posted with reference to a PO using MIRO. The requirement now is to reverse the paymnet documnet 200005678 in SAP, then reverse the document that was posted using FB60. After this the invoice will be posted using MIRO. This will create an open item on the vendor account.
    This item will not be piad out again. Therefore the requirement is to try clear that open item against the previously posted payment document 200005678.
    Is there any way to clear this vendor open item against the originally posted payment document 200005678?? Or any other advice on how this scenario can be handled in SAP?
    Thank for your help.
    Mike

    Hi,
    I tried that option in our test system. I ran FBRA and entered Paymnet Documnet Number (+Clearing Doc Number), Company Code, Fiscal Year.
    Then chose menu option Clearing -> Reset Cleared Items.
    The system pops up a window asking for a reversal reason and reversal date.  I use 01 and posting date of today.
    The system now posts another cleared document. That document places the invoice as an open item on the vendor account. It does not place the Payment Document as an open item on the account.
    When I go to F-44 only the open vendor invoice is showing there. There is no open paymnet document.
    Is there perhaps some configuration setting that stops the placement of the paymnet document as an open item when reset?
    Thanks for your help again.

  • Error -Account 'Down-payments clearing account' could not be found for area

    When I am trying to pass a down payment entry by debiting vedor and crediting bank with asset it is giving an error as follows.
    Account 'Down-payments clearing account' could not be found for area 01
    Message no. AU133
    Please help me to rectify the same.
    Thanks in advance
    Deepak

    HI
    Please pay attention at  the possible causes of message AU133:
    1. Error AU133:
       a) You have not defined a contra account for acquisition value postings in the Asset Accounting Customizing settings (Transaction AO90).However, this is required as of Release 4.6C because, as is the case for all other integration postings in Asset Accounting, invoice receipt postings have to be displayed in Asset Accounting via the new posting kernel to ensure an identical document
    structure.
       b) You have defined the account in Asset Accounting, however, it is not created in the affected company code.Check whether the account is correct and create it for the company code, if necessary.
    2. You have entered an asset reconciliation account for the "Contra account: Acquisition value posting" (for example, the same account as for   "Acquisition:Acquis. and production costs" account).This is not  permitted.Check whether your account determination is correct               
       (Transaction AO90) in Asset Accounting Customizing. The same applies
       for the 'Contra account: Down payment posting'.
    3. As "Contra account: Acquisition value posting" you entered an asset G/L account. If necessary change the automatic posting indicator in the G/L account master record.
    4.Check if you need  revaluation accounts in depreciation areas involved   (AO90):
      -Revaluation acquis. and production costs
      -Offsetting account: Revaluation APC
    Please run also programm RACKONTO where missing or wrong customizing
    the accoutn determinations per company code is displayed
    Also have a look at note 7595 in this regard.
    Please assign points if it useful.
    Regards
    Ravinagh Boni

  • Select-option in Module Pool-Error-Include block not specified .........

    Hi,
    I am trying to define a select-option at Module Pool level.
    In the program
    SELECTION-SCREEN BEGIN OF SCREEN 1010 AS SUBSCREEN.
    SELECT-OPTIONS: V_BWTAR FOR MSEG-BWTAR.
    SELECTION-SCREEN END OF SCREEN 1010.
    In the Screen flow logic it is as follows
    PROCESS BEFORE OUTPUT.
    MODULE STATUS_0600.
    CALL SUBSCREEN sub_1010 INCLUDING sy-repid '1010'.
    PROCESS AFTER INPUT.
    CALL SUBSCREEN sub_1010.
    MODULE USER_COMMAND_0600.
    At SE51 it is showing an error
    "Include block not specified,not defined or spelt incorrectly.".
    Please let me know how to correct this.
    Thanks,
    K.Kiran.

    HI Emre
    I am having the same issue.  there is not possible to create a subscreen by se51 since I already define the subscreen by selection-screen begin of screen *** as subscreen.
    regards TP

  • Clearing document does not balance to zero

    Hello to the community,
    maybe someone ever been through this issue before:
    We had to regenerate documents (via RFSEPA01 program) for a GL account which was switched to open items incorrectly years ago and for which account balance and drilldown did not tie. After running the program all tables seemed to be aligned as FAGLB03, FAGLL03, FBL3N and F-03 were all in sync.
    The issue comes when a clearing document was created for one of these documents and now it is still sitting in BSIS table although it was cleared. The clearing document does not balance out to zero but the user was able to post it through F-03 but cannot reverse it through FBRA we get message:
    Balance of the line items is not zero F5136.
    The solution would be to delete this record from the BSIS table as account balance and details match but not FAGLL03, FBL3N and F-03. I ran report TFC_COMPARE_VZ for the company code and nothing was found.
    Any idea?
    PS- I have been through a bunch of OSS notes and could not find anything as this is not related to payment card neither to + or - signs.
    Kindest regards,
    Gen
    Here are the details of the clearing document created:

    Hello Geneviee,
    Thank you for your reply, please return the message when you are ready for me to logon and I will try and deal with it as soon as possible.
    Kind Regards,
    Martin

  • Is it possible to clear the entire Bookmarks list at one time in Safari for Windows?

    Hello. Is it possible to clear the entire Bookmarks list at one time in Safari for Windows? I would like to continue to use the Safari browser even though I have Windows 7 as the operating system on my notebook. When I try to delete bookmark entries one at a time, after deleting several, errors start popping up in the browser. Can I reinstall Safari without the Bookmarks I've built up? Please help a humbled Safari user.

    Are you sure that you can change the permissions of symlinks themselves? I think I've tried to make files read-only via symlinks on a local server but ended up using bindfs because it wasn't possible. Even if you can, symlinking everything that might be necessary for a given environment would not be ideal, plus I don't think symlinks can be used across different filesystems.
    If a real-life human can figure out if it's he/she is in a chroot and break out of it, then he/she can write a script to do the same. I want a sandbox that could run malicious code with no effect on the system (if that's possible). Also, I think if the chroot idea were truly feasible, makepkg would have been using it for years already to simply install packages in the chroot as you normally would and then package them. There would also be several sandbox applications that could run applications safely. So far I have yet to find any.
    I admit that I haven't looked into using a chroot in detail though and of course I may have missed some application which creates such a setup. Right now I think using per-application namespaces with fuse seems the most promising but I won't know until I've finished implementing a test application. If it turns out that it's a dead end I'll take harder look at chroot but it really doesn't seem to be able to do what I want.

Maybe you are looking for