IS - Policy evaluation performance

Hi all,
I am trying to find out why a policy evaluation takes over a second.
The request is generated using C API, IS and DS are running on different machines. Don't think there is a networking problem. IS version is 6.1
My questions are:
- Are there any tools available to measure the IS response time?
- Any parameters on the server to be tuned for performance optimization?
- Any steps I should take to make sure that there is no networking involved?
- Has anyone done any policy evaluation in Java? - how was the performance? what about the session token validation?
Thanks in advance for any suggestions.
Dan

If your DNS is not working this slows down access to protected resource by the timeout for DNS (per each page request!). The performance impacts are probably about the same for doing a reverse lookup on every request (not great for large numbers of requesters).

Similar Messages

  • Can someone please confirm if we can use top_guide.106.pl for evaluating performance of 10.5.8 Mac OS X Servers also?

    HI,
    Can someone please confirm if we can use top_guide.106.pl for evaluating performance of 10.5.8 Mac OS X Servers also?
    Thanks.

    HI,
    Can someone please confirm if we can use top_guide.106.pl for evaluating performance of 10.5.8 Mac OS X Servers also?
    Thanks.

  • Ldm migrate fails with : "Set PM policy to performance"

    Hi
    after "panicing" 1 primary domain I'm trying to migrate one of its guest domain to another primary domain.
    this procedure have been tested before and worked many times.
    now when I try to migrate its says :
    Migration is disabled because Power Management is active
    Set PM policy to performance to enable migration
    although when I check in the SP it is on performance like this:
    -> ls /SP/powermgmt
    /SP/powermgmt
    Targets:
    Properties:
    actual_power = 337
    policy = performance
    Commands:
    cd
    set
    show
    ( on both the source and the target machines the policy is performance )
    I even tried to powercycle the 2 machines and it didn't changed anything.
    I use LDom Manager 1.3 , firmware 7.2.7
    I noticed there is a new firmware 7.2.8 released 02 Apr 2010, maybe an upgrade will solve it?
    any other idea?
    Thanks in advance,
    Ori

    Hi Andreas,
    Thanks for your feedback.
    I will test and reproduce your issue on my side. Any information, I will post back for you.
    Thanks for your understanding.
    Regards,
    Will
    We are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time. Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.
    Click
    HERE to participate the survey.

  • Policy Evaluation using session attributes condition

    Hi Guys,
    I have custom policies defined in Access Manager for several resources to be protected. What i am trying to achieve is When policy evaluation happens to calculate the resources based on the ldaproles for a user entry, I need few session properties to be applied which are defined under "conditions" in the policy setup . I need to figure out how would set these users AM session properties from the client application. Any inputs would be of great help.
    Thanking in advance.
    Akeel M Sayyad.

    Anyways, I figured it out. You can do it using SSOTokenManager.

  • Develop and run Policy Evaluation Programs

    Hi,
    I am trying to use the Policy sample on windows xp but when I try to instantiate the PolicyEvaluator Object I get the following error.
    PolicyEvaluator pe=new PolicyEvaluator(name);
    Getting Policy Evaluator ...
    Exception : Can not create policy cache
    Invalid admin user/password from DSConfigMgr.
    Invalid admin user/password from DSConfigMgr.
    com.sun.identity.policy.PolicyException(1):Can not create policy cache
    Invalid admin user/password from DSConfigMgr.
    com.iplanet.sso.SSOException(2):Invalid admin user/password from DSConfigMgr.
    com.iplanet.sso.SSOException: Invalid admin user/password from DSConfigMgr.
         at com.sun.identity.policy.ServiceTypeManager.getSSOToken(ServiceTypeManager.java:188)
         at com.sun.identity.policy.PolicyCache.getInstance(PolicyCache.java:71)
         at com.sun.identity.policy.PolicyEvaluator.<init>(PolicyEvaluator.java:215)
         at com.sun.identity.policy.PolicyEvaluator.<init>(PolicyEvaluator.java:178)
         at de.dailab.de.policy.PolicyEvaluationKS.main(PolicyEvaluationKS.java:53)
    I the amSDK debug log the error message is:
    12/17/2004 06:49:13:436 PM CET: Thread[main,5,main]
    ERROR: SMSEntry: Unable to initalize(exception):
    Got LDAPServiceException code=19
         at com.iplanet.services.ldap.DSConfigMgr.loadServerConfiguration(DSConfigMgr.java:419)
         at com.iplanet.services.ldap.DSConfigMgr.getDSConfigMgr(DSConfigMgr.java:147)
         at com.sun.identity.sm.SMSEntry.<clinit>(SMSEntry.java:95)
         at com.sun.identity.sm.ServiceManager.<clinit>(ServiceManager.java:72)
         at com.sun.identity.sm.ServiceConfigManager.<init>(ServiceConfigManager.java:81)
         at com.sun.identity.policy.PolicyManager.<init>(PolicyManager.java:202)
         at de.dailab.de.policy.PolicyCreator.<init>(PolicyCreator.java:81)
         at de.dailab.de.policy.PolicyCreator.main(PolicyCreator.java:96)

    I think that I am encountering the same error. It fails to initialize the PolicyEvaluator with the same error condition. Did you ever find a solution to this?

  • OAM 10g policy evaluation issue

    I have the policy with following authorization expression: Rule A|Rule B.
    Rule A:
    allowed: all users with o=Org A
    denied: any user
    allow takes precedence: true
    Rule B:
    allowed: all users with o=Org B
    denied: any user
    allow takes precedence: true
    I want the policy to grant access to any user in either of organizations. It does not work for users with o=Org B. Instead access tester shows that Rule A was in effect and authorization is inconclusive. The only way I can make it to work is by removing denial conditions completely: i.e. denied=no one is denied. It does not make sense to me - each rule actually works if not combined with another one.
    Does anybody know whether it is a bug?
    Thanks,
    Alex

    Hi Alex,
    The important thing to remember is that for OR conditions, OAM will stop processing the expression as soon as the user is explicitly referenced (for either Allow or Deny) in a rule, as evaluated from left to right. So if you have an expression:
    RuleA OR RuleB OR RuleC
    and the logged in user is not mentioned in ruleA, but is Allowed in RuleB, then OAM will not process RuleC.
    (With AND conditions, OAM needs to know all of the results, so in the case of an expression:
    RuleX AND RuleY AND RuleZ
    if the user satisfies RuleX, then OAM still needs to process RuleY and RuleZ in order to determine if the user meets the requirements of the expression.)
    In the majority of cases, the way OAM works does boil down to the same as Boolean logic. If, for example, the OR expression above tested that a user is in either GroupA, or GroupB, or GroupC and the user is in GroupA, the only effect of the way that OAM works is that it does not unnecessarily work out if the user is in GroupB or GroupC.
    The two areas which I can see as potentially causing confusion are:
    - when you have an Allow Anyone or Deny Anyone in a rule. In this case, clearly every user is explicitly mentioned in a rule, and processing will stop at this rule as far as OR operations are concerned (as in the example you originally gave).
    - when you want different actions to be performed depending on which rule is applied (so if a user is a member of both GroupA and GroupC, you may have different sets of header variables that need to be applied).
    But generally, if these are not factors, I would expect the same behaviour for more complex relations (such as your "(Rule 1 OR Rule 2) AND (Rule 3 OR Rule 4)" expression) to be the same as for Boolean operations. In this case if a user satisfies Rule1, then it will still evaluate AND (Rule3 OR Rule4), but not Rule2.
    If the above factors really do cause OAM to evaluate undesirable results for you, would it be possible to move the complexity to group membership? For example you could define group membership to be the result of a complex ldap filter, and then define a simple rule (and expression) and associated actions which allows access based on this group.
    Regards,
    Colin

  • Another OAM 10g policy evaluation question

    I have a policy with authz expression= Rule A & Rule B & Rule C:
    Rule A:
    Allow: ldap_attr_1 = X
    Deny: no one is denied
    Allow preceeds denial: true
    Authz failure redirection URL: URL1
    Rule B:
    Allow: ldap_attr_2 = Y
    Deny: no one is denied
    Allow preceeds denial: true
    Authz failure redirection URL: URL1
    Rule C:
    Allow: anyone is allowed
    Deny: ldap_attr_3 = Z
    Allow preceeds denial: false
    Authz failure redirection URL: URL2
    My user profile has ldap_attr_1=X, ldap_attr_2=Y, ldap_attr_3=Z, I expect access to be denied based on Rule C and user redirected to URL2. Instead I see authorization = Inconclusive and Rule=<not found>.
    If user has ldap_attr_1=X, ldap_attr_2=Y and NOT ldap_attr_3=Z I am getting correct evaluation - user is authorized.
    Any ideas how to make this working? Basically I want user to be redirected to the URL that is defined in the rule that caused denial.
    Thanks,
    Alex

    Hi Colin,
    Here's what I have:
    Authz Rule: Rule1
    Access allowed: Any one
    Access denied: ldap rule (attr=value)
    Allow takes precedence: false
    Actions: redirect to URL1 on denied
    You can use any attribute and any value, i am using my custom attribute. Then I protect a resource /myresource with policy Policy1 that only has this rule. Set up attr=value and access tester shows redirection to URL1. Now 2 more rules:
    Authz Rule: Rule2
    Access allowed: ldap rule (o=org)
    Access denied: no one is denied
    Allow takes precedence: true
    Actions: no actions
    Authz Rule: Rule3
    Access allowed: ldap rule (title=title)
    Access denied: no one is denied
    Allow takes precedence: true
    Actions: no actions
    And Policy2 has authz expression Rule2 AND Rule3 AND Rule1. And Policy2 has action: redirect on authorization inconclusive to URL2. My user's profile has o=org, title=title, attr=value. Access tester shows redirection to URL2.
    Thanks,
    Alex

  • Self-evaluation, Performance Management

    Hi,
    I need help to solve a problem. I'm implementing the Performance Management module, and the process can be one the following:
    - manager appraisal for his employees
    - or the employee (appraisee) does his self-evaluation, and after the manager could accept it or not.
    If the manager does not accept the evaluation from the appraisee, he creates the final appraisal.
    So I configured one form, based in standard appraisal, and when I try to create my self-evaluation, in R3 the form appears, but in portal the appraisal form only appears to the manager, it doesn't appear to the appraisee.
    Can anyone help me, please?
    Thanks in advance for any help.

    hi
    check the status flow of the template u have designed.
    And also check what all buttons that come in the first page on portal when manager opens the appraisal. In your case the template may be needed to opened first by the manager then save , it will go to the concerned employee , then come back for ratings.
    Regards
    sameer

  • Vendor Evaluation/performance report

    We need a report that shows vendor delivery performance. We wanna do that report by comparing GR date with Delivery date including delivery quantity between a specified time interval(for example september.2007). Report must check if supplier sends the parts on time.If supplier send parts, for example 4 days early, then system must find it comparing delivery date with actual good receipt date.And also order quantity must be compared with delivered quantity.This analysis must be done for schedule lines and POs all together.

    Dear Gopala Turaga,
    Actually, we are looking for standard SAP transactions if we can make use of like MCE3, MC$8 and MC$6. What I concluded from those transactions that MC$& and MC$8 can cover our requirements, but resulting quantities and deviations are not meaningful. For example, for any supplier I know that deliveries are on time with 3 days delays however report yields totally different results. Do you any other transations other than MC$8 ,MC$6 and MCE3,MCE7,MCE8, etc...? second question is how to customize tolerances at related transactions?
    The KPI Supplier-On Time Delivery Performance is the comparison of the required delivery date in the purchase order/schedule line to the actual goods receipt entry date per supplier. For the calculation of the Supplier-On Time Delivery Performance the delivery tolerances are respected.

  • ISE v1.2 AuthC Policy Processing Performance

    Hi guys,
    We have ISE v1.2 running in the lab at the moment, and are intending to first deploy a Proof of Concept at two sites before a global deployment across four data centers and 150 Tier 1/Tier 3 sites.
    We will be deploying ISE for wired 802.1x for domain devices and MAB for trusted non-802.1x capable and guest devices
    ISE will be performing RADIUS proxy for 802.1x to Microsoft NPS servers using RADIUS Server Sequences. (I know ISE can do this but this was the design choice made by the business to meet certain requirements...)
    - DC sites will have a pair of PSN nodes (and separate PAN and MNT nodes in the top-level DC) and a pair of NPS servers.
    - Tier 1 sites will have a local PSN node and NPS server.
    - Tier 3 sites will use the regional DC PSN nodes and NPS servers.
    In order to ensure authentication requests are sent by ISE to the nearest NPS server, we are testing specific RADIUS Server Sequences that are called by specific Authentication policies that match a location (plus 802.1x auth) condition.
    We have quite a lot of these rules - 40 so far in the lab.
    My question is, has anybody built out a similar design, and what performance impact does ISE suffer by trawling through a long list of Authentication policies? How can we monitor this? I have optimised the Tier 3 sites at the top of the list (as these sites have no local ISE and suffer heavy latency to their regional DC).
    All helpful replies are rated!
    Kind regards, Ash.

    Kindly find the link below may help you have some information and address your query.
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/ise/1.0/user_guide/ise10_prof_pol.html
    Filtering Endpoint Attributes
    Cisco ISE, when enabled with multiple probes per node, experiences a considerable performance degrading due to numerous attributes per endpoint are collected and stored in the administration node database. Some of the attributes that are collected are temporal in nature as well as not required for endpoint profiling. The huge collection of attributes per probe for each of the endpoint, which cannot be used for endpoint profiling, result in Cisco ISE administration node database persistence and performance degrading.
    To address performance degrading of Cisco ISE, filters for RADIUS, DHCP for both the DHCP Helper and DHCP SPAN, HTTP, and SNMP probes have been implemented in the profiler probes (except for the NetFlow probe). Each probe filter contains the list of attributes that are temporal and irrelevant for endpoint profiling and removes those attributes from the attributes collected by the probes.

  • Sizelimit exceeded in Policy evaluation searches!!!

    hi all,
    I have an organization configured in AM with about 2 million users. Each user has a specific attribute (webresource) to indicate which web resource it is allowed to access.
    I created a LDAP filtered group for each value of that attribute. The ideia is to have a group of users that access resource1, other group of users that access resource2, and so on.
    Ex:
    group1 is made by the filter "webresource=1"
    group2 is made by the filter "webresource=2"
    etc, etc,
    Each of those groups is a subject of a policy. And here is where i start to have a serious problem!
    On of those filtered groups evaluates to 100.000 users, and because of that the web agent can�t evaluate the user because it receives a "size limit exceeded" error.
    I already have the "Maximum Results Returned From Search" attribute in the "Policy Configuration" set to 2000. Giving it a value of 100.000 is not a solution, as it will overload the LDAP server!
    Is there any other way to configure the policy, considering these huge amount of users ?
    Thank you very much for your help.
    Regards,
    Rui Monteiro

    The behaviour you're observing is documented in a bug. Unfortunately it's not implemented since the 5.2 days and not targeted for 7.0 either. You could create a local admin user and assign rights, or use a tool like "Apache Directory Studio" and log in as directory manager.
    4534340 reslimit should provide interface for chaining and PTA plugin

  • Database Performance Evaluation Benchmarking Tuning

    Does anyone by chance have any articles or websites that deal with Oracle (or generic) database performance evaluation, benchmarking, and/or tuning for a STANDALONE PC database installation? I have Oracle 10g installed on my personal machine and I want to find some information that will help me place the performance evaluation into a more professinal context. Any links relating to this would be very appreciated.
    regards,
    John

    Why do you expect there to be a difference in evaluating performance for a standalone PC database installation vs. a server database installation? Other than the fact that, presumably, you won't find network events in the top wait events, I'm hard-pressed to think of any differences.
    You would evaluate performance and tune the system the same way on a standalone database as on a database on a server box-- you would figure out what operations are important, figure out how quickly those operations need to run, figure out which of the important operations are running slowly, figure out what those operations are spending time doing, and then figure out how to reduce the runtime. Of course, each of those steps can potentially be rather involved. There are plenty of articles and books on performance tuning-- Oracle has a few manuals, Jonathan Lewis's book on the cost based optimizer is excellent, Cary Millsap's optimization book is top flight, etc.
    As for benchmarking, unless the intention is to run something like the TPC benchmark on your desktop, which would seem odd, your benchmark is generally closely tied to your application-- i.e. figuring out how quickly the system performs a particular business operation. Generic benchmarks like TPC tend not to be particularly useful in the real world because they are unlikely to mimic your real workload.
    Justin

  • Poor performance using policy agent 2.2 with Sun Access Manager

    Even if com.sun.am.policy.agents.config.do_sso_only is set to true, the policy agent sent a request to PolicyService (svcid="Policy") and it's take more than 8 seconds to receive a respose. Any idea why ??
    Agent Log
    2012-10-15 08:11:42.441MaxDebug 24211:130800 PolicyService: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
    <RequestSet vers="1.0" svcid="Policy" reqid="9">
    <Request><![CDATA[
    <PolicyService version="1.0">
    <PolicyRequest requestId="2" appSSOToken="AQIC5wM2LY4SfcynHuhUJZ2ol3lBzD0LJVKLpP7ULh6sgcg=@AAJTSQACMDE=#">
    <GetResourceResults userSSOToken="AQIC5wM2LY4Sfczm02fTJAo4H1i82OGPsRWMs5t6D7bRaVQ=@AAJTSQACMDE=#" serviceName="iPlanetAMWebAgentService" resourceName="http://devappa11.dev.emergis:80" resourceScope="response-attributes-only">
    <EnvParameters>
    <AttributeValuePair>
    <Attribute name="requestIp"/>
    <Value>142.168.64.128</Value>
    </AttributeValuePair>
    </EnvParameters>
    <GetResponseDecisions>
    <Attribute name="uid"/>
    </GetResponseDecisions>
    </GetResourceResults>
    </PolicyRequest>
    </PolicyService>]]>
    </Request>
    </RequestSet>
    2012-10-15 08:11:42.441MaxDebug 24211:130800 PolicyService: BaseService::sendRequest Request line: POST /amserver/policyservice HTTP/1.0
    2012-10-15 08:11:42.441 Debug 24211:130800 PolicyService: BaseService::sendRequest Cookie and Headers =Host: devappf9.dev.emergis
    2012-10-15 08:11:42.441 Debug 24211:130800 PolicyService: BaseService::sendRequest Content-Length =Content-Length: 778
    2012-10-15 08:11:42.441 Debug 24211:130800 PolicyService: BaseService::sendRequest Header Suffix =Accept: text/xml
    Content-Type: text/xml; charset=UTF-8
    2012-10-15 08:11:42.441MaxDebug 24211:130800 PolicyService: BaseService::sendRequest(): Total chunks: 24.
    2012-10-15 08:11:42.441MaxDebug 24211:130800 PolicyService: BaseService::sendRequest(): Sent 24 chunks.
    2012-10-15 08:11:50.801 Debug 24211:130800 PolicyService: HTTP Status = 200 (OK)
    2012-10-15 08:11:50.801MaxDebug 24211:130800 PolicyService: Http::Response::readAndParse(): Reading headers.
    2012-10-15 08:11:50.801MaxDebug 24211:130800 PolicyService: Server: Sun-ONE-Web-Server/6.1
    2012-10-15 08:11:50.801MaxDebug 24211:130800 PolicyService: Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 12:11:50 GMT
    2012-10-15 08:11:50.801MaxDebug 24211:130800 PolicyService: Content-type: text/html
    2012-10-15 08:11:50.801MaxDebug 24211:130800 PolicyService: Connection: close
    2012-10-15 08:11:50.801 Debug 24211:130800 PolicyService: Http::Response::readAndParse(): No content length in response.
    2012-10-15 08:11:50.802MaxDebug 24211:130800 all: Connection::waitForReply(): returns with status success.
    2012-10-15 08:11:50.802MaxDebug 24211:130800 PolicyService: Http::Response::readAndParse(): Completed processing the response with status: success
    2012-10-15 08:11:50.802MaxDebug 24211:130800 PolicyService: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
    <ResponseSet vers="1.0" svcid="policy" reqid="9">
    <Response><![CDATA[<PolicyService version="1.0" revisionNumber="30">
    <PolicyResponse requestId="2">
    <ResourceResult name="http://devappa11.dev.emergis:80">
    <PolicyDecision>
    <ResponseDecisions>
    <AttributeValuePair>
    <Attribute name="uid"/>
    <Value>cppuser1</Value>
    </AttributeValuePair>
    </ResponseDecisions>
    </PolicyDecision>
    </ResourceResult>
    </PolicyResponse>
    </PolicyService>
    ]]></Response>
    </ResponseSet>

    10/15/2012 08:11:48:511 AM EDT: Thread[service-j2ee-9,5,main]
    PolicyCache:cacheKeys in cache:[policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^policyadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^datastoresreadonly/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^policyadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/selfreadattributes/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/jackpolicy/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=nfld-ehr,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/test jack/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^datastoresreadonly/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/p_dis_system administrator_null/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=nfld-ehr,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmreadonly/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/jackpolicy/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/selfwriteattributes/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmreadonly/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/p_dis_testjan1_null/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=nfld-ehr,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/routetonfld-ehr/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/dc=dev,dc=emergis]
    10/15/2012 08:11:48:511 AM EDT: Thread[service-j2ee-9,5,main]
    Policy dc=dev^dc=emergis^^DatastoresReadOnly is Using Policy evaluation order :1
    10/15/2012 08:11:48:511 AM EDT: Thread[service-j2ee-9,5,main]
    Using policy evaluation order:SUBJECTS_CONDITIONS_RULES
    10/15/2012 08:11:48:511 AM EDT: Thread[service-j2ee-9,5,main]
    Subjects.isMember():getting subject evaluation results from resultCache of policy
    10/15/2012 08:11:48:511 AM EDT: Thread[service-j2ee-9,5,main]
    at Policy.getPolicyDecision() principal, resource name, action names, policyName, policyDecision = uid=cppuser1,ou=people,o=NFLD-EHR,dc=dev,dc=emergis, sms://o=nfld-ehr,dc=dev,dc=emergis/sunIdentityRepositoryService/1.0/application/user/cppuser1, [MODIFY, READ, DELEGATE], dc=dev^dc=emergis^^DatastoresReadOnly,
    10/15/2012 08:11:48:511 AM EDT: Thread[service-j2ee-9,5,main]
    at PolicyCache.getPolicy(orgName,policyName):orgName=o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis:policyName=dc=dev^dc=emergis^^RealmAdmincacheKey=/policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis
    10/15/2012 08:11:48:511 AM EDT: Thread[service-j2ee-9,5,main]
    PolicyCache:cacheKeys in cache:[policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^policyadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^datastoresreadonly/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^policyadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/selfreadattributes/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/jackpolicy/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=nfld-ehr,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/test jack/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^datastoresreadonly/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/p_dis_system administrator_null/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=nfld-ehr,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmreadonly/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/jackpolicy/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/selfwriteattributes/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmreadonly/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/p_dis_testjan1_null/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=nfld-ehr,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/routetonfld-ehr/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/dc=dev,dc=emergis]
    10/15/2012 08:11:48:511 AM EDT: Thread[service-j2ee-9,5,main]
    Policy dc=dev^dc=emergis^^RealmAdmin is Using Policy evaluation order :1
    10/15/2012 08:11:48:511 AM EDT: Thread[service-j2ee-9,5,main]
    Using policy evaluation order:SUBJECTS_CONDITIONS_RULES
    10/15/2012 08:11:48:511 AM EDT: Thread[service-j2ee-9,5,main]
    Subjects.isMember():getting subject evaluation results from resultCache of policy
    10/15/2012 08:11:48:512 AM EDT: Thread[service-j2ee-9,5,main]
    at Policy.getPolicyDecision() principal, resource name, action names, policyName, policyDecision = uid=cppuser1,ou=people,o=NFLD-EHR,dc=dev,dc=emergis, sms://o=nfld-ehr,dc=dev,dc=emergis/sunIdentityRepositoryService/1.0/application/user/cppuser1, [MODIFY, READ, DELEGATE], dc=dev^dc=emergis^^RealmAdmin,
    10/15/2012 08:11:48:512 AM EDT: Thread[service-j2ee-9,5,main]
    at PolicyCache.getPolicy(orgName,policyName):orgName=o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis:policyName=SelfWriteAttributescacheKey=/policies/selfwriteattributes/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis
    10/15/2012 08:11:48:512 AM EDT: Thread[service-j2ee-9,5,main]
    PolicyCache:cacheKeys in cache:[policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^policyadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^datastoresreadonly/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^policyadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/selfreadattributes/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/jackpolicy/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=nfld-ehr,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/test jack/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^datastoresreadonly/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/p_dis_system administrator_null/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=nfld-ehr,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmreadonly/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/jackpolicy/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/selfwriteattributes/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmreadonly/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/p_dis_testjan1_null/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=nfld-ehr,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/routetonfld-ehr/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/dc=dev,dc=emergis]
    10/15/2012 08:11:48:512 AM EDT: Thread[service-j2ee-9,5,main]
    at PolicyCache.getPolicy(orgName,policyName):orgName=o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis:policyName=o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^DatastoresReadOnlycacheKey=/policies/o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^datastoresreadonly/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis
    10/15/2012 08:11:48:512 AM EDT: Thread[service-j2ee-9,5,main]
    PolicyCache:cacheKeys in cache:[policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^policyadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^datastoresreadonly/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^policyadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/selfreadattributes/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/jackpolicy/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=nfld-ehr,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/test jack/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^datastoresreadonly/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/p_dis_system administrator_null/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=nfld-ehr,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmreadonly/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/jackpolicy/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/selfwriteattributes/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmreadonly/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/p_dis_testjan1_null/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=nfld-ehr,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/routetonfld-ehr/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/dc=dev,dc=emergis]
    10/15/2012 08:11:48:512 AM EDT: Thread[service-j2ee-9,5,main]
    at PolicyCache.getPolicy(orgName,policyName):orgName=o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis:policyName=o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^RealmAdmincacheKey=/policies/o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis
    10/15/2012 08:11:48:512 AM EDT: Thread[service-j2ee-9,5,main]
    PolicyCache:cacheKeys in cache:[policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^policyadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^datastoresreadonly/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^policyadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/selfreadattributes/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/jackpolicy/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=nfld-ehr,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/test jack/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^datastoresreadonly/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/p_dis_system administrator_null/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=nfld-ehr,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmreadonly/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/jackpolicy/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/selfwriteattributes/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmreadonly/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/p_dis_testjan1_null/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=nfld-ehr,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/routetonfld-ehr/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/dc=dev,dc=emergis]
    10/15/2012 08:11:48:512 AM EDT: Thread[service-j2ee-9,5,main]
    at PolicyCache.getPolicy(orgName,policyName):orgName=o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis:policyName=SelfReadAttributescacheKey=/policies/selfreadattributes/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis
    10/15/2012 08:11:48:513 AM EDT: Thread[service-j2ee-9,5,main]
    PolicyCache:cacheKeys in cache:[policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^policyadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^datastoresreadonly/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^policyadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/selfreadattributes/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/jackpolicy/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=nfld-ehr,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/test jack/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^datastoresreadonly/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/p_dis_system administrator_null/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=nfld-ehr,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmreadonly/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/jackpolicy/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/selfwriteattributes/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmreadonly/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/p_dis_testjan1_null/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=nfld-ehr,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/routetonfld-ehr/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/dc=dev,dc=emergis]
    10/15/2012 08:11:48:513 AM EDT: Thread[service-j2ee-9,5,main]
    at PolicyCache.getPolicy(orgName,policyName):orgName=o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis:policyName=dc=dev^dc=emergis^^DatastoresReadOnlycacheKey=/policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^datastoresreadonly/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis
    10/15/2012 08:11:48:513 AM EDT: Thread[service-j2ee-9,5,main]
    PolicyCache:cacheKeys in cache:[policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^policyadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^datastoresreadonly/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^policyadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/selfreadattributes/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/jackpolicy/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=nfld-ehr,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/test jack/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^datastoresreadonly/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/p_dis_system administrator_null/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=nfld-ehr,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmreadonly/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/jackpolicy/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/selfwriteattributes/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmreadonly/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/p_dis_testjan1_null/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=nfld-ehr,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/routetonfld-ehr/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/dc=dev,dc=emergis]
    10/15/2012 08:11:48:513 AM EDT: Thread[service-j2ee-9,5,main]
    at PolicyCache.getPolicy(orgName,policyName):orgName=o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis:policyName=dc=dev^dc=emergis^^RealmAdmincacheKey=/policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis
    10/15/2012 08:11:48:513 AM EDT: Thread[service-j2ee-9,5,main]
    PolicyCache:cacheKeys in cache:[policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^policyadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^datastoresreadonly/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^policyadmin/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/selfreadattributes/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/jackpolicy/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=nfld-ehr,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/test jack/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^datastoresreadonly/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/p_dis_system administrator_null/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=nfld-ehr,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/o=nfld-ehr^dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmreadonly/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/jackpolicy/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/selfwriteattributes/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/dc=dev^dc=emergis^^realmreadonly/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=sunamhiddenrealmdelegationservicepermissions,ou=services,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/p_dis_testjan1_null/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/o=nfld-ehr,dc=dev,dc=emergis, /policies/routetonfld-ehr/default/1.0/iplanetampolicyservice/dc=dev,dc=emergis]
    10/15/2012 08:11:48:513 AM EDT: Thread[service-j2ee-9,5,main]
    at PolicyEvaluator.getPolicyDecision() orgsToVist=[]
    10/15/2012 08:11:48:513 AM EDT: Thread[service-j2ee-9,5,main]
    at PolicyEvaluator.getPolicyDecision() orgsToVist(after removing already visited orgs=[]
    10/15/2012 08:11:50:515 AM EDT: Thread[service-j2ee-9,5,main]
    PolicyRequestHandler.processRequest(): get response from policy framework:
    <PolicyService version="1.0" revisionNumber="30">
    <PolicyResponse requestId="2">
    <ResourceResult name="http://devappa11.dev.emergis:80">
    <PolicyDecision>
    <ResponseDecisions>
    <AttributeValuePair>
    <Attribute name="uid"/>
    <Value>cppuser1</Value>
    </AttributeValuePair>
    </ResponseDecisions>
    </PolicyDecision>
    </ResourceResult>
    </PolicyResponse>
    </PolicyService>

  • Skipping request for user policy assignments due to agent configuration for authority

    Hello all,
    Symptoms:
    The Configuration Manager only shows the following actions:
    Application Deployment Evaluation Cycle
    Machine Policy Retrieval & Evaluation Cycle
    Software Updates Deployment Evaluation Cycle
    User Policy Retrieval & Evaluation Cycle
    In Software Center there are no applications visible. Also the default 'IT Organization' is shown instead of the 'real' name.
    The Confugration Manager:
    shows in the tab 'General' the correct Management point. Connection type is 'currently intranet' (ok)
    shows in the tab 'Site' the correct site code.
    shows in the tab 'Components' all components as either 'installed' or 'enabled'. Only CCM Notification Agent shows 'Disabled'.
    In SCCM 2012 under 'Client Settings' -> 'Default Settings' -> 'Client Policy' the setting 'Enable User policy on clients' has been enabled.
    Done so far (without success):
    Re-installed the MP
    Run a query on the SCCM Database to check if there are any corrupt records. There are not.
    Installed version 5.00.7958.1000
    CCM Framework: 5.00.7958.1203
    The computer is installed with a task sequence. There is a reboot after 'Setup Windows and ConfigMgr (CM2012 R2 CU1)'.
    Installation command of the SCCM Client (during OSD deployment):
    SMSCACHEFLAGS=PERCENTDISKSPACE SMSCACHESIZE=10 SMSSLP=demo-sccm.demoforest.local SMSMP=demo-sccm.demoforest.local PATCH="%_SMSTSMDataPath%\OSD\TDS00020\KB2938441\configmgr2012ac-r2-kb2938441-i386.msp"
    Content log files on the client:
    PolicyAgent.log:
    Processing PreShutdown event PolicyAgent_RequestAssignments 8/4/2014 11:56:52 PM 2204 (0x089C)
    Processing PostStartup event PolicyAgent_RequestAssignments 8/4/2014 11:57:37 PM 2436 (0x0984)
    Policy Download Endpoint's message queue is empty; proceeding with maintenance work PolicyAgent_Cleanup 8/4/2014 11:57:37 PM 2436 (0x0984)
    Registered for MP notifications. PolicyAgent_PostStartup 8/4/2014 11:57:37 PM 2436 (0x0984)
    Not rerequesting policy on site code change in provisioning mode. PolicyAgent_ReRequestPolicy 8/5/2014 12:01:55 AM 3212 (0x0C8C)
    Processing PostStartup event PolicyAgent_RequestAssignments 8/5/2014 12:02:48 AM 2352 (0x0930)
    Policy Download Endpoint's message queue is empty; proceeding with maintenance work PolicyAgent_Cleanup 8/5/2014 12:02:48 AM 2352 (0x0930)
    Registered for MP notifications. PolicyAgent_PostStartup 8/5/2014 12:02:48 AM 2352 (0x0930)
    Processing PostStartup event PolicyAgent_RequestAssignments 8/5/2014 12:11:36 AM 2720 (0x0AA0)
    Policy Download Endpoint's message queue is empty; proceeding with maintenance work PolicyAgent_Cleanup 8/5/2014 12:11:36 AM 2720 (0x0AA0)
    Registered for MP notifications. PolicyAgent_PostStartup 8/5/2014 12:11:36 AM 2720 (0x0AA0)
    Processing PostStartup event PolicyAgent_RequestAssignments 8/5/2014 1:25:02 AM 3164 (0x0C5C)
    Policy Download Endpoint's message queue is empty; proceeding with maintenance work PolicyAgent_Cleanup 8/5/2014 1:25:02 AM 3164 (0x0C5C)
    Registered for MP notifications. PolicyAgent_PostStartup 8/5/2014 1:25:02 AM 3164 (0x0C5C)
    Processing PostStartup event PolicyAgent_RequestAssignments 8/5/2014 1:26:05 AM 2652 (0x0A5C)
    Policy Download Endpoint's message queue is empty; proceeding with maintenance work PolicyAgent_Cleanup 8/5/2014 1:26:05 AM 2652 (0x0A5C)
    Registered for MP notifications. PolicyAgent_PostStartup 8/5/2014 1:26:05 AM 2652 (0x0A5C)
    Triggered update of user S-1-5-21-1840543543-1948091412-3654635223-1109 settings PolicyAgent_RequestAssignments 8/5/2014 9:00:57 AM 3232 (0x0CA0)
    Requesting User policy assignments for 'S-1-5-21-1840543543-1948091412-3654635223-1109' PolicyAgent_RequestAssignments 8/5/2014 9:02:34 AM 2484 (0x09B4)
    Requesting User policy from authority 'SMS:TDS' PolicyAgent_RequestAssignments 8/5/2014 9:02:34 AM 2484 (0x09B4)
    Skipping request for user policy assignments due to agent configuration for authority 'SMS:TDS'. PolicyAgent_RequestAssignments 8/5/2014 9:02:34 AM 2484 (0x09B4)
    ClientIDManagerStartup.log:
    [----- STARTUP -----] ClientIDManagerStartup 8/5/2014 1:24:34 AM 372 (0x0174)
    Read SMBIOS (encoded): 31003800300035002D0030003700310038002D0035003700330038002D0035003500350033002D0034003800350030002D0038003000390030002D0032003800 ClientIDManagerStartup 8/5/2014 1:24:52 AM 2932 (0x0B74)
    Evaluated SMBIOS (encoded): 31003800300035002D0030003700310038002D0035003700330038002D0035003500350033002D0034003800350030002D0038003000390030002D0032003800 ClientIDManagerStartup 8/5/2014 1:24:52 AM 2932 (0x0B74)
    No SMBIOS Changed ClientIDManagerStartup 8/5/2014 1:24:52 AM 2932 (0x0B74)
    SMBIOS unchanged ClientIDManagerStartup 8/5/2014 1:24:52 AM 2932 (0x0B74)
    SID unchanged ClientIDManagerStartup 8/5/2014 1:24:52 AM 2932 (0x0B74)
    HWID unchanged ClientIDManagerStartup 8/5/2014 1:24:53 AM 2932 (0x0B74)
    GetSystemEnclosureChassisInfo: IsFixed=TRUE, IsLaptop=FALSE ClientIDManagerStartup 8/5/2014 1:24:53 AM 2932 (0x0B74)
    Windows To Go requires a minimum operating system of Windows 8 ClientIDManagerStartup 8/5/2014 1:24:53 AM 2932 (0x0B74)
    Computed HardwareID=2:0760033F87CBB92FC5D6343C630C99002655F937
     Win32_SystemEnclosure.SerialNumber=1805-0718-5738-5553-4850-8090-28
     Win32_SystemEnclosure.SMBIOSAssetTag=2522-6626-0190-0004-7023-0906-91
     Win32_BaseBoard.SerialNumber=1805-0718-5738-5553-4850-8090-28
     Win32_BIOS.SerialNumber=1805-0718-5738-5553-4850-8090-28
     Win32_NetworkAdapterConfiguration.MACAddress=00:15:5D:00:2A:0C ClientIDManagerStartup 8/5/2014 1:24:53 AM 2932 (0x0B74)
    Persisted hardware IDs in CCM_ClientIdentificationInformation=@:
     HardwareID1=2:0760033F87CBB92FC5D6343C630C99002655F937
     HardwareID2=98130500010000EE ClientIDManagerStartup 8/5/2014 1:24:53 AM 2932 (0x0B74)
    Failed to open to WMI namespace '\\.\root\ccmvdi' (8007045b) ClientIDManagerStartup 8/5/2014 1:25:02 AM 372 (0x0174)
    [----- SHUTDOWN -----] ClientIDManagerStartup 8/5/2014 1:25:02 AM 372 (0x0174)
    [----- STARTUP -----] ClientIDManagerStartup 8/5/2014 1:25:42 AM 2012 (0x07DC)
    Read SMBIOS (encoded): 31003800300035002D0030003700310038002D0035003700330038002D0035003500350033002D0034003800350030002D0038003000390030002D0032003800 ClientIDManagerStartup 8/5/2014 1:25:51 AM 2504 (0x09C8)
    Evaluated SMBIOS (encoded): 31003800300035002D0030003700310038002D0035003700330038002D0035003500350033002D0034003800350030002D0038003000390030002D0032003800 ClientIDManagerStartup 8/5/2014 1:25:51 AM 2504 (0x09C8)
    No SMBIOS Changed ClientIDManagerStartup 8/5/2014 1:25:51 AM 2504 (0x09C8)
    SMBIOS unchanged ClientIDManagerStartup 8/5/2014 1:25:51 AM 2504 (0x09C8)
    SID unchanged ClientIDManagerStartup 8/5/2014 1:25:51 AM 2504 (0x09C8)
    HWID unchanged ClientIDManagerStartup 8/5/2014 1:25:53 AM 2504 (0x09C8)
    GetSystemEnclosureChassisInfo: IsFixed=TRUE, IsLaptop=FALSE ClientIDManagerStartup 8/5/2014 1:25:53 AM 2504 (0x09C8)
    Windows To Go requires a minimum operating system of Windows 8 ClientIDManagerStartup 8/5/2014 1:25:53 AM 2504 (0x09C8)
    Computed HardwareID=2:0760033F87CBB92FC5D6343C630C99002655F937
     Win32_SystemEnclosure.SerialNumber=1805-0718-5738-5553-4850-8090-28
     Win32_SystemEnclosure.SMBIOSAssetTag=2522-6626-0190-0004-7023-0906-91
     Win32_BaseBoard.SerialNumber=1805-0718-5738-5553-4850-8090-28
     Win32_BIOS.SerialNumber=1805-0718-5738-5553-4850-8090-28
     Win32_NetworkAdapterConfiguration.MACAddress=00:15:5D:00:2A:0C ClientIDManagerStartup 8/5/2014 1:25:53 AM 2504 (0x09C8)
    Persisted hardware IDs in CCM_ClientIdentificationInformation=@:
     HardwareID1=2:0760033F87CBB92FC5D6343C630C99002655F937
     HardwareID2=98C70600010000EE ClientIDManagerStartup 8/5/2014 1:25:53 AM 2504 (0x09C8)
    ClientAuth.log:
    Error signing client message (0x80004005). ClientAuth 4/22/2014 9:25:01 PM 1612 (0x064C)
    Error signing client message (0x80004005). ClientAuth 4/22/2014 9:25:01 PM 1612 (0x064C)
    Error signing client message (0x80004005). ClientAuth 4/22/2014 9:25:02 PM 1612 (0x064C)
    Error signing client message (0x80004005). ClientAuth 4/22/2014 9:25:02 PM 1612 (0x064C)
    ClientLocation.log:
    Current AD forest name is demoforest.local, domain name is demoforest.local ClientLocation 8/5/2014 1:24:34 AM 372 (0x0174)
    Domain joined client is in Intranet ClientLocation 8/5/2014 1:24:34 AM 372 (0x0174)
    Current AD forest name is demoforest.local, domain name is demoforest.local ClientLocation 8/5/2014 1:24:53 AM 2932 (0x0B74)
    Domain joined client is in Intranet ClientLocation 8/5/2014 1:24:53 AM 2932 (0x0B74)
    Rotating assigned management point, new management point [1] is: DEMO-SCCM.demoforest.local (7958) with capabilities: <Capabilities SchemaVersion="1.0"><Property Name="SSLState" Value="0"/></Capabilities> ClientLocation 8/5/2014
    1:24:53 AM 2932 (0x0B74)
    Assigned MP changed from <DEMO-SCCM.demoforest.local> to <DEMO-SCCM.demoforest.local>. ClientLocation 8/5/2014 1:24:53 AM 2932 (0x0B74)
    Rotating assigned management point, new management point [1] is: DEMO-SCCM.demoforest.local (7958) with capabilities: <Capabilities SchemaVersion="1.0"><Property Name="SSLState" Value="0"/></Capabilities> ClientLocation 8/5/2014
    1:24:54 AM 2932 (0x0B74)
    Assigned MP changed from <DEMO-SCCM.demoforest.local> to <DEMO-SCCM.demoforest.local>. ClientLocation 8/5/2014 1:24:54 AM 2932 (0x0B74)
    Current AD forest name is demoforest.local, domain name is demoforest.local ClientLocation 8/5/2014 1:25:42 AM 2012 (0x07DC)
    Domain joined client is in Intranet ClientLocation 8/5/2014 1:25:42 AM 2012 (0x07DC)
    Current AD forest name is demoforest.local, domain name is demoforest.local ClientLocation 8/5/2014 1:25:53 AM 2504 (0x09C8)
    Domain joined client is in Intranet ClientLocation 8/5/2014 1:25:53 AM 2504 (0x09C8)
    Rotating assigned management point, new management point [1] is: DEMO-SCCM.demoforest.local (7958) with capabilities: <Capabilities SchemaVersion="1.0"><Property Name="SSLState" Value="0"/></Capabilities> ClientLocation 8/5/2014
    1:25:53 AM 2504 (0x09C8)
    Assigned MP changed from <DEMO-SCCM.demoforest.local> to <DEMO-SCCM.demoforest.local>. ClientLocation 8/5/2014 1:25:53 AM 2504 (0x09C8)
    Rotating assigned management point, new management point [1] is: DEMO-SCCM.demoforest.local (7958) with capabilities: <Capabilities SchemaVersion="1.0"><Property Name="SSLState" Value="0"/></Capabilities> ClientLocation 8/5/2014
    1:25:53 AM 2504 (0x09C8)
    Assigned MP changed from <DEMO-SCCM.demoforest.local> to <DEMO-SCCM.demoforest.local>. ClientLocation 8/5/2014 1:25:53 AM 2504 (0x09C8)
    Getting Assigned Site ClientLocation 8/5/2014 9:02:38 AM 2264 (0x08D8)
    Assigned Site is TDS ClientLocation 8/5/2014 9:02:38 AM 2264 (0x08D8)
    Getting Assigned Site ClientLocation 8/5/2014 1:19:20 PM 2604 (0x0A2C)
    Assigned Site is TDS ClientLocation 8/5/2014 1:19:20 PM 2604 (0x0A2C)
    execmgr.log (with errors):
    Requesting MTC to delete task with id: {C5DCEE82-C903-4CBD-98CC-534646B3EFD7} execmgr 4/22/2014 7:14:28 PM 1872 (0x0750)
    This execution request does not own the corresponding task in MTC, returning without deleting it from MTC. execmgr 4/22/2014 7:14:28 PM 1872 (0x0750)
    Service startup. execmgr 4/22/2014 7:16:09 PM 2332 (0x091C)
    Service startup. execmgr 4/22/2014 9:17:36 PM 2216 (0x08A8)
    Service startup. execmgr 4/22/2014 9:23:02 PM 2348 (0x092C)
    Service startup. execmgr 4/22/2014 9:24:53 PM 1000 (0x03E8)
    Software Distribution site settings (CCM_SoftwareDistributionClientConfig) policy does not yet exist on the client.
    If the client is not yet registered, this is expected behavior. execmgr 8/4/2014 11:56:52 PM 3224 (0x0C98)
    Software Distribution site settings (CCM_SoftwareDistributionClientConfig) policy does not yet exist on the client.
    If the client is not yet registered, this is expected behavior. execmgr 8/4/2014 11:56:52 PM 1292 (0x050C)
    Service startup. execmgr 8/4/2014 11:57:32 PM 3696 (0x0E70)
    Software Distribution site settings (CCM_SoftwareDistributionClientConfig) policy does not yet exist on the client.
    If the client is not yet registered, this is expected behavior. execmgr 8/4/2014 11:57:33 PM 3696 (0x0E70)
    Software distribution agent was enabled execmgr 8/5/2014 12:01:55 AM 3448 (0x0D78)
    Service startup. execmgr 8/5/2014 12:02:44 AM 2272 (0x08E0)
    ExecMgr::GetTaskState - GetTaskState Failed with error code 0x87d00317 execmgr 8/5/2014 12:03:02 AM 1652 (0x0674)
    Policy arrived for child program Install execmgr 8/5/2014 12:03:02 AM 1648 (0x0670)
    Creating mandatory request for advert TDS20014, program Install, package TDS00014 execmgr 8/5/2014 12:03:02 AM 1652 (0x0674)
    An existing MTC token was supplied, this execution request is not owner of MTC object. execmgr 8/5/2014 12:03:02 AM 1652 (0x0674)
    CertificateMaintanance.log:
    HTTP is selected for Client. The current state is 0. CertificateMaintenance 4/22/2014 6:49:04 PM 604 (0x025C)
    Raising pending event:
    instance of CCM_ServiceHost_CertRetrieval_Status
     DateTime = "20140422164904.539000+000";
     HRESULT = "0x00000001";
     ProcessID = 3320;
     ThreadID = 604;
     CertificateMaintenance 4/22/2014 6:49:04 PM 604 (0x025C)
    Raising event:
    instance of CCM_ServiceHost_CertRetrieval_Status
     ClientID = "GUID:7ff40832-4c01-456f-9705-096da67985b3";
     DateTime = "20140422164946.336000+000";
     HRESULT = "0x00000001";
     ProcessID = 3320;
     ThreadID = 3216;
     CertificateMaintenance 4/22/2014 6:49:46 PM 3216 (0x0C90)
    HTTP is selected for Client. The current state is 0. CertificateMaintenance 8/4/2014 11:56:39 PM 2212 (0x08A4)
    Raising pending event:
    instance of CCM_ServiceHost_CertRetrieval_Status
     DateTime = "20140804215639.612000+000";
     HRESULT = "0x00000001";
     ProcessID = 2144;
     ThreadID = 2212;
     CertificateMaintenance 8/4/2014 11:56:39 PM 2212 (0x08A4)
    Raising event:
    instance of CCM_ServiceHost_CertRetrieval_Status
     ClientID = "GUID:b8d72095-2590-4724-9db9-b721efc05007";
     DateTime = "20140804215651.440000+000";
     HRESULT = "0x00000001";
     ProcessID = 2144;
     ThreadID = 3348;
     CertificateMaintenance 8/4/2014 11:56:51 PM 3348 (0x0D14)
    Client is set to use HTTPS when available. The current state is 480. CertificateMaintenance 8/4/2014 11:56:56 PM 1096 (0x0448)
    Client is set to use HTTPS when available. The current state is 480. CertificateMaintenance 8/5/2014 12:02:33 AM 1656 (0x0678)
    Client is set to use HTTPS when available. The current state is 480. CertificateMaintenance 8/5/2014 12:11:17 AM 384 (0x0180)
    Client is set to use HTTPS when available. The current state is 480. CertificateMaintenance 8/5/2014 1:24:34 AM 372 (0x0174)
    Client is set to use HTTPS when available. The current state is 480. CertificateMaintenance 8/5/2014 1:25:42 AM 2012 (0x07DC)
    smscliui.log:
    Perform Action: Request & Evaluate User Policy - {3A88A2F3-0C39-45fa-8959-81F21BF500CE}. Message sent, id={FC736B58-2635-45B8-8002-E7C8D6CCEB8D} smscliui 8/5/2014 9:02:34 AM 2484 (0x09B4)
    Current Assigned Site: TDS smscliui 8/5/2014 9:02:38 AM 868 (0x0364)
    Currently assigned FQDN:  smscliui 8/5/2014 9:02:41 AM 868 (0x0364)
    Failed to set DNSSuffix value to the registry. smscliui 8/5/2014 9:02:58 AM 868 (0x0364)
    SMS Site code has not been changed. smscliui 8/5/2014 9:02:58 AM 868 (0x0364)
    Current Assigned Site: TDS smscliui 8/5/2014 1:19:20 PM 2160 (0x0870)
    CcmMessaging.log:
    Queue 'StateMessageManager' initialized with 0 messages. CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Initialized queue processor 'StateMessageManager'. Enabled=true Concurrency=1 CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Initializing queue 'CTMDTSReply'... CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Queue 'CTMDTSReply' initialized with 0 messages. CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Initialized queue processor 'CTMDTSReply'. Enabled=true Concurrency=5 CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Initializing queue 'execmgr'... CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Queue 'execmgr' initialized with 0 messages. CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Initialized queue processor 'execmgr'. Enabled=true Concurrency=1 CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Initializing queue 'PolicyAgent_RequestAssignments'... CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Queue 'PolicyAgent_RequestAssignments' initialized with 0 messages. CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Initialized queue processor 'PolicyAgent_RequestAssignments'. Enabled=true Concurrency=5 CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Initializing queue 'ClientRegistration'... CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Queue 'ClientRegistration' initialized with 0 messages. CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Initialized queue processor 'ClientRegistration'. Enabled=true Concurrency=5 CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Initializing queue 'EndpointProtectionAgent'... CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Queue 'EndpointProtectionAgent' initialized with 0 messages. CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Initialized queue processor 'EndpointProtectionAgent'. Enabled=true Concurrency=20 CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Initializing queue 'LS_ScheduledCleanup'... CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Queue 'LS_ScheduledCleanup' initialized with 0 messages. CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Initialized queue processor 'LS_ScheduledCleanup'. Enabled=true Concurrency=5 CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Initializing queue 'PolicyAgent_Cleanup'... CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Queue 'PolicyAgent_Cleanup' initialized with 0 messages. CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Initialized queue processor 'PolicyAgent_Cleanup'. Enabled=true Concurrency=5 CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Initializing queue 'DCMAgent'... CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Queue 'DCMAgent' initialized with 0 messages. CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Initialized queue processor 'DCMAgent'. Enabled=true Concurrency=5 CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Initializing queue 'CertEnrollAgent'... CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Queue 'CertEnrollAgent' initialized with 0 messages. CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Initialized queue processor 'CertEnrollAgent'. Enabled=true Concurrency=1 CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Initializing queue 'ExternalEventAgent'... CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Queue 'ExternalEventAgent' initialized with 0 messages. CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Initialized queue processor 'ExternalEventAgent'. Enabled=true Concurrency=20 CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Initializing queue 'UpdateStore'... CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Queue 'UpdateStore' initialized with 0 messages. CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Initialized queue processor 'UpdateStore'. Enabled=true Concurrency=1 CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Initializing queue 'PolicyAgent_ReplyAssignments'... CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Queue 'PolicyAgent_ReplyAssignments' initialized with 0 messages. CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Initialized queue processor 'PolicyAgent_ReplyAssignments'. Enabled=true Concurrency=5 CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Initializing queue 'SMSSHA'... CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Queue 'SMSSHA' initialized with 0 messages. CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Initialized queue processor 'SMSSHA'. Enabled=true Concurrency=1 CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Initializing queue 'lmp_[http]mp_locationmanager'... CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Queue 'lmp_[http]mp_locationmanager' initialized with 0 messages. CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Initialized queue processor 'lmp_[http]mp_locationmanager'. Enabled=true Concurrency=1 CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Initializing queue 'mp_statusreceiver'... CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Queue 'mp_statusreceiver' initialized with 0 messages. CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Initialized queue processor 'mp_statusreceiver'. Enabled=true Concurrency=1 CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Initializing queue 'mp_[http]mp_locationmanager'... CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Queue 'mp_[http]mp_locationmanager' initialized with 1 messages. CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Initialized queue processor 'mp_[http]mp_locationmanager'. Enabled=true Concurrency=1 CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:50 AM 2192 (0x0890)
    Raising event:
    instance of CCM_CcmHttp_Status
     ClientID = "GUID:b8d72095-2590-4724-9db9-b721efc05007";
     DateTime = "20140804232553.423000+000";
     HostName = "DEMO-SCCM.demoforest.local";
     HRESULT = "0x00000000";
     ProcessID = 1996;
     StatusCode = 0;
     ThreadID = 2504;
     CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:53 AM 2504 (0x09C8)
    Raising event:
    instance of CCM_CcmHttp_Status
     ClientID = "GUID:b8d72095-2590-4724-9db9-b721efc05007";
     DateTime = "20140804232553.485000+000";
     HostName = "DEMO-SCCM.demoforest.local";
     HRESULT = "0x00000000";
     ProcessID = 1996;
     StatusCode = 0;
     ThreadID = 2504;
     CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:53 AM 2504 (0x09C8)
    Raising event:
    instance of CCM_CcmHttp_Status
     ClientID = "GUID:b8d72095-2590-4724-9db9-b721efc05007";
     DateTime = "20140804232553.563000+000";
     HostName = "DEMO-SCCM.demoforest.local";
     HRESULT = "0x00000000";
     ProcessID = 1996;
     StatusCode = 0;
     ThreadID = 2504;
     CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:53 AM 2504 (0x09C8)
    Raising event:
    instance of CCM_CcmHttp_Status
     ClientID = "GUID:b8d72095-2590-4724-9db9-b721efc05007";
     DateTime = "20140804232553.657000+000";
     HostName = "DEMO-SCCM.demoforest.local";
     HRESULT = "0x00000000";
     ProcessID = 1996;
     StatusCode = 0;
     ThreadID = 2504;
     CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:25:53 AM 2504 (0x09C8)
    Raising event:
    instance of CCM_CcmHttp_Status
     ClientID = "GUID:b8d72095-2590-4724-9db9-b721efc05007";
     DateTime = "20140804232606.048000+000";
     HostName = "DEMO-SCCM.demoforest.local";
     HRESULT = "0x00000000";
     ProcessID = 1996;
     StatusCode = 0;
     ThreadID = 2508;
     CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:26:06 AM 2508 (0x09CC)
    Raising event:
    instance of CCM_CcmHttp_Status
     ClientID = "GUID:b8d72095-2590-4724-9db9-b721efc05007";
     DateTime = "20140804232606.110000+000";
     HostName = "DEMO-SCCM.demoforest.local";
     HRESULT = "0x00000000";
     ProcessID = 1996;
     StatusCode = 0;
     ThreadID = 2188;
     CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:26:06 AM 2188 (0x088C)
    Raising event:
    instance of CCM_CcmHttp_Status
     ClientID = "GUID:b8d72095-2590-4724-9db9-b721efc05007";
     DateTime = "20140804232606.188000+000";
     HostName = "DEMO-SCCM.demoforest.local";
     HRESULT = "0x00000000";
     ProcessID = 1996;
     StatusCode = 0;
     ThreadID = 2504;
     CcmMessaging 8/5/2014 1:26:06 AM 2504 (0x09C8)
    CcmNotificationAgent.log:
    Bgb client agent is starting... BgbAgent 8/5/2014 1:26:05 AM 2504 (0x09C8)
    Bgb client agent is disabled BgbAgent 8/5/2014 1:26:05 AM 2504 (0x09C8)
    TCP Listener is disabled. BgbAgent 8/5/2014 1:26:05 AM 2504 (0x09C8)
    BgbController main thread is started with settings: {bgb enable = 0}, {tcp enabled = 0}, {tcp port = 0} and {http enabled = 0}. BgbAgent 8/5/2014 1:26:05 AM 2504 (0x09C8)
    Wait 3600 seconds for event notification. BgbAgent 8/5/2014 1:26:05 AM 3076 (0x0C04)
    Wait 3600 seconds for event notification. BgbAgent 8/5/2014 2:26:05 AM 3076 (0x0C04)
    Any help is appreciated and with kind regards,
    Willem-Jan

    Hello all,
    I modified the TS, but the problem is still there.
    smsts.log:
    ==============================[ OSDSetupHook.exe ]============================== OSDSetupHook 8/5/2014 4:51:30 PM 856 (0x0358)
    Executing task sequence OSDSetupHook 8/5/2014 4:51:30 PM 856 (0x0358)
    Loading the Task Sequencing Environment from "C:\_SMSTaskSequence\TSEnv.dat". OSDSetupHook 8/5/2014 4:51:30 PM 856 (0x0358)
    Environment scope successfully created: Global\{51A016B6-F0DE-4752-B97C-54E6F386A912} OSDSetupHook 8/5/2014 4:51:30 PM 856 (0x0358)
    Environment scope successfully created: Global\{BA3A3900-CA6D-4ac1-8C28-5073AFC22B03} OSDSetupHook 8/5/2014 4:51:30 PM 856 (0x0358)
    Debug shell is enabled OSDSetupHook 8/5/2014 4:51:39 PM 856 (0x0358)
    Successfully enabled debug command shell support. OSDSetupHook 8/5/2014 4:51:39 PM 856 (0x0358)
    Configuring local administrator account OSDSetupHook 8/5/2014 4:51:39 PM 856 (0x0358)
    Re-assign all drive letters... OSDSetupHook 8/5/2014 4:51:39 PM 856 (0x0358)
    Could not open drive Q:\ (80070005) OSDSetupHook 8/5/2014 4:51:39 PM 856 (0x0358)
    Ignoring inaccessible volume 'Q:' with error 0x80070005 OSDSetupHook 8/5/2014 4:51:39 PM 856 (0x0358)
    No partition needs to be udpated. OSDSetupHook 8/5/2014 4:51:39 PM 856 (0x0358)
    Installing SMS client OSDSetupHook 8/5/2014 4:51:39 PM 856 (0x0358)
    Client already installed. OSDSetupHook 8/5/2014 4:51:39 PM 856 (0x0358)
    Moving logs to SMS client directory OSDSetupHook 8/5/2014 4:51:39 PM 856 (0x0358)
    Successfully moved logs to SMS client log directory: C:\Windows\CCM\Logs\SMSTSLog OSDSetupHook 8/5/2014 4:51:39 PM 856 (0x0358)
    Executing task sequence manager bootstrap OSDSetupHook 8/5/2014 4:51:39 PM 856 (0x0358)
    Executing command line: "C:\Windows\CCM\TSMBootstrap.exe" /env:Gina /configpath:C:\_SMSTaskSequence /bootcount:5 OSDSetupHook 8/5/2014 4:51:39 PM 856 (0x0358)
    ==============================[ TSMBootStrap.exe ]============================== TSMBootstrap 8/5/2014 4:51:39 PM 2152 (0x0868)
    Command line: "C:\Windows\CCM\TSMBootstrap.exe" /env:Gina /configpath:C:\_SMSTaskSequence /bootcount:5 TSMBootstrap 8/5/2014 4:51:39 PM 2152 (0x0868)
    Current OS version is 6.1.7601.1 TSMBootstrap 8/5/2014 4:51:39 PM 2152 (0x0868)
    Logging successfully initialized. TSMBootstrap 8/5/2014 4:51:39 PM 2152 (0x0868)
    Resuming Task Sequence in Full OS TSMBootstrap 8/5/2014 4:51:39 PM 2152 (0x0868)
    We are going in GINA and potentially need to set the authenticator TSMBootstrap 8/5/2014 4:51:39 PM 2152 (0x0868)
    setting the authenticator TSMBootstrap 8/5/2014 4:51:39 PM 2152 (0x0868)
    Executing command line: "C:\Windows\CCM\TsProgressUI.exe" /Register:WinPE TSMBootstrap 8/5/2014 4:51:39 PM 2152 (0x0868)
    ==========[ TsProgressUI started in process 2196 ]========== TsProgressUI 8/5/2014 4:51:39 PM 2200 (0x0898)
    Command line: "C:\Windows\CCM\TsProgressUI.exe" /Register:WinPE TsProgressUI 8/5/2014 4:51:39 PM 2200 (0x0898)
    Registering COM classes TsProgressUI 8/5/2014 4:51:39 PM 2200 (0x0898)
    sbModulePath = C:\Windows\CCM\TsProgressUI.exe TsProgressUI 8/5/2014 4:51:39 PM 2200 (0x0898)
    Unregistering class objects TsProgressUI 8/5/2014 4:51:39 PM 2200 (0x0898)
    Shutdown complete. TsProgressUI 8/5/2014 4:51:39 PM 2200 (0x0898)
    Process completed with exit code 0 TSMBootstrap 8/5/2014 4:51:39 PM 2152 (0x0868)
    Successfully registered TS Progress UI. TSMBootstrap 8/5/2014 4:51:39 PM 2152 (0x0868)
    Found network adapter "Intel 21140-Based PCI Fast Ethernet Adapter (Emulated)" with IP Address 5.5.5.101. TSMBootstrap 8/5/2014 4:51:39 PM 2152 (0x0868)
    Starting Task Sequence Manager. TSMBootstrap 8/5/2014 4:51:39 PM 2152 (0x0868)
    executing TS Manager not in full media TSMBootstrap 8/5/2014 4:51:39 PM 2152 (0x0868)
    executing TS Manager in c:\windows\ccm TSMBootstrap 8/5/2014 4:51:39 PM 2152 (0x0868)
    Executing command line: "TsManager.exe" TSMBootstrap 8/5/2014 4:51:39 PM 2152 (0x0868)
    Successfully intialized Logging for TS Manager. TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Commandline: "TsManager.exe" TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    /service parameter found at index: -1 TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    /standalone parameter found at index: -1 TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    /noclient parameter found at index: -1 TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Successfully registered Task Sequencing COM Interface. TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Executing as a standalone exe TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Initializing TS Environment TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Opening Task Sequencing Environment TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Deleting volume ID file C:\_SMSTSVolumeID.7159644d-f741-45d5-ab29-0ad8aa4771ca ... TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    pwszPath && *pwszPath, HRESULT=80070057 (e:\qfe\nts\sms\framework\tscore\resolvesource.cpp,228) TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    pwszPath && *pwszPath, HRESULT=80070057 (e:\qfe\nts\sms\framework\tscore\resolvesource.cpp,228) TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    pwszPath && *pwszPath, HRESULT=80070057 (e:\qfe\nts\sms\framework\tscore\resolvesource.cpp,228) TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    pwszPath && *pwszPath, HRESULT=80070057 (e:\qfe\nts\sms\framework\tscore\resolvesource.cpp,228) TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    NOT executing in WinPE TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Compiling Config policy TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Compiling config policies... TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Compiling SysHealthConfig policy... TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Retrieving value from TSEnv for '_SMSTSSysHealthClientConfig' TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    ::DecompressBuffer(65536) TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Decompression (zlib) succeeded: original size 684, uncompressed size 4652. TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Instance path = 'CCM_SystemHealthClientConfig.SiteSettingsKey="1"' TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Start to compile TS policy TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Policy complied successfully in WMI 'root\ccm\policy\defaultmachine\requestedconfig' namespace TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    End TS policy compilation TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Compiling SoftUpdConfig policy... TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Retrieving value from TSEnv for '_SMSTSSWUpdateClientConfig' TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    ::DecompressBuffer(65536) TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Decompression (zlib) succeeded: original size 1922, uncompressed size 19242. TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Start to compile TS policy TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Policy complied successfully in WMI 'root\ccm\policy\defaultmachine\requestedconfig' namespace TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    End TS policy compilation TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Instance path = 'CCM_SoftwareUpdatesClientConfig.SiteSettingsKey="1"' TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Start to compile TS policy TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Policy complied successfully in WMI 'root\ccm\policy\defaultmachine\requestedconfig' namespace TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    End TS policy compilation TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Start to compile TS policy TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Policy complied successfully in WMI 'root\ccm\policy\defaultmachine\requestedconfig' namespace TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    End TS policy compilation TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Start to compile TS policy TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Policy complied successfully in WMI 'root\ccm\policy\defaultmachine\requestedconfig' namespace TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    End TS policy compilation TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Compiling SoftDistClientConfig policy... TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Retrieving value from TSEnv for '_SMSTSSoftDistClientConfig' TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    ::DecompressBuffer(65536) TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Decompression (zlib) succeeded: original size 1327, uncompressed size 13740. TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Instance path = 'CCM_SoftwareDistributionClientConfig.SiteSettingsKey="1"' TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Start to compile TS policy TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Policy complied successfully in WMI 'root\ccm\policy\defaultmachine\requestedconfig' namespace TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    End TS policy compilation TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Compiling NAAConfig policy... TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Retrieving value from TSEnv for '_SMSTSNAAConfigPolicy' TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    ::DecompressBuffer(65536) TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Decompression (zlib) succeeded: original size 1022, uncompressed size 6494. TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Instance path = 'CCM_NetworkAccessAccount.SiteSettingsKey="1"' TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Start to compile TS policy TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Policy complied successfully in WMI 'root\ccm\policy\defaultmachine\requestedconfig' namespace TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    End TS policy compilation TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Instance path = 'CCM_NetworkAccessAccount.SiteSettingsKey="1"' TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Start to compile TS policy TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Policy complied successfully in WMI 'root\ccm\policy\defaultmachine\requestedconfig' namespace TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    End TS policy compilation TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Compiling RebootSettingsConfig policy... TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Retrieving value from TSEnv for '_SMSTSRebootSettingsConfigPolicy' TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    ::DecompressBuffer(65536) TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Decompression (zlib) succeeded: original size 433, uncompressed size 1556. TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Instance path = 'CCM_RebootSettings.SiteSettingsKey="1"' TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Start to compile TS policy TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Policy complied successfully in WMI 'root\ccm\policy\defaultmachine\requestedconfig' namespace TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    End TS policy compilation TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Compiling AppManClientConfig policy... TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Retrieving value from TSEnv for '_SMSTSAppManClientConfigPolicy' TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    ::DecompressBuffer(65536) TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Decompression (zlib) succeeded: original size 982, uncompressed size 6358. TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Instance path = 'CCM_ApplicationManagementClientConfig.SiteSettingsKey="1"' TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Start to compile TS policy TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Failed to find property 'AutoApplyDeployment' in 'CCM_ApplicationManagementClientConfig' class defintion. Error 0x80041002. Default value will be used for this property TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Policy complied successfully in WMI 'root\ccm\policy\defaultmachine\requestedconfig' namespace TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    End TS policy compilation TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Get Install Directory for SMS Client TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Updating settings in \\.\root\ccm\policy\machine\actualconfig TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:40 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    RequestedConfig policy instance(s) : 435 TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:49 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Locked \\.\ROOT\ccm\policy\machine\RequestedConfig for source SMS:Client:Default:{BFDADC41-FDCD-4B9C-B446-8A818D01BEA3} successfully TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:49 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Namespace: \\.\ROOT\ccm\policy\machine\RequestedConfig, Query: SELECT PolicyID FROM CCM_Policy_Policy5 WHERE (PolicySource = "SMS:Client:Default:{BFDADC41-FDCD-4B9C-B446-8A818D01BEA3}") AND (PolicyState
    = "Active") AND (PolicyType = "Machine") TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:49 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    There is no ccm_policy_policy instance, skipping addition to realinst map TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:49 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Unlocked \\.\ROOT\ccm\policy\machine\RequestedConfig for source SMS:Client:Default:{BFDADC41-FDCD-4B9C-B446-8A818D01BEA3} successfully TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:49 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    RequestedConfig policy instance(s) : 0 TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:50 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Locked \\.\ROOT\ccm\policy\machine\RequestedConfig for source SMS:TDS successfully TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:50 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Namespace: \\.\ROOT\ccm\policy\machine\RequestedConfig, Query: SELECT PolicyID FROM CCM_Policy_Policy5 WHERE (PolicySource = "SMS:TDS") AND (PolicyState = "Active") AND (PolicyType = "Machine") TSManager 8/5/2014
    4:51:50 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    There is no ccm_policy_policy instance, skipping addition to realinst map TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:50 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Unlocked \\.\ROOT\ccm\policy\machine\RequestedConfig for source SMS:TDS successfully TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:50 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    RequestedConfig policy instance(s) : 0 TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:51 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Locked \\.\ROOT\ccm\policy\machine\RequestedConfig for source CcmPortal successfully TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:51 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Namespace: \\.\ROOT\ccm\policy\machine\RequestedConfig, Query: SELECT PolicyID FROM CCM_Policy_Policy5 WHERE (PolicySource = "CcmPortal") AND (PolicyState = "Active") AND (PolicyType = "Machine") TSManager 8/5/2014
    4:51:51 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    There is no ccm_policy_policy instance, skipping addition to realinst map TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:51 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Unlocked \\.\ROOT\ccm\policy\machine\RequestedConfig for source CcmPortal successfully TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:51 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    RequestedConfig policy instance(s) : 0 TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:53 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Locked \\.\ROOT\ccm\policy\machine\RequestedConfig for source Local successfully TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:53 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    RequestedConfig policy instance(s) : 9 TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:53 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Unlocked \\.\ROOT\ccm\policy\machine\RequestedConfig for source Local successfully TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:53 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    RequestedConfig policy instance(s) : 11943 TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:57 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Locked \\.\ROOT\ccm\policy\machine\RequestedConfig for source CcmTaskSequence successfully TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:57 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Namespace: \\.\ROOT\ccm\policy\machine\RequestedConfig, Query: SELECT PolicyID FROM CCM_Policy_Policy5 WHERE (PolicySource = "CcmTaskSequence") AND (PolicyState = "Active") AND (PolicyType = "Machine") TSManager 8/5/2014
    4:51:57 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    There is no ccm_policy_policy instance, skipping addition to realinst map TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:57 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Unlocked \\.\ROOT\ccm\policy\machine\RequestedConfig for source CcmTaskSequence successfully TSManager 8/5/2014 4:51:57 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Total RequestedConfig policy instance(s) : 12387 TSManager 8/5/2014 4:52:00 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    New/Changed ActualConfig policy instance(s) : 0 TSManager 8/5/2014 4:52:04 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Policy evaluation initiated TSManager 8/5/2014 4:52:04 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Waiting for policy to be compiled in 'root\ccm\policy\machine' namespace  TSManager 8/5/2014 4:52:04 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Query = 'CCM_SystemHealthClientConfig.SiteSettingsKey="1"'  TSManager 8/5/2014 4:52:04 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Verified policy for instance path 'CCM_SystemHealthClientConfig.SiteSettingsKey="1"' compiled in 'root\ccm\policy\machine' namespace TSManager 8/5/2014 4:52:04 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Query = 'CCM_SoftwareUpdatesClientConfig.SiteSettingsKey="1"'  TSManager 8/5/2014 4:52:04 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Verified policy for instance path 'CCM_SoftwareUpdatesClientConfig.SiteSettingsKey="1"' compiled in 'root\ccm\policy\machine' namespace TSManager 8/5/2014 4:52:04 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Query = 'CCM_SoftwareDistributionClientConfig.SiteSettingsKey="1"'  TSManager 8/5/2014 4:52:04 PM 2244 (0x08C4)
    Verified policy for instance path 'CCM_SoftwareDistributionClientConfig.SiteSettingsKey="1"' compiled in 'root\ccm\policy\machine'
    The Powershell command as described by NPerson give the output:
    C:\Windows\system32>powershell Invoke-WmiMethod -Namespace root\CCM -Class SMS_C
    lient -Name SetClientProvisioningMode -ArgumentList $false
    __GENUS          : 1
    __CLASS          : __PARAMETERS
    __SUPERCLASS     :
    __DYNASTY        : __PARAMETERS
    __RELPATH        : __PARAMETERS
    __PROPERTY_COUNT : 1
    __DERIVATION     : {}
    __SERVER         : DEMO-CAPTURE
    __NAMESPACE      : ROOT\ccm
    __PATH           :
    \\DEMO-CAPTURE\ROOT\ccm:__PARAMETERS
    ReturnValue      :
    PSComputerName   : DEMO-CAPTURE
    It is about the PSComputerName: that is the name of the machine on which the capture was made. So I suppose the problem is already in the image. Is my statement correct or is it not relevant?
    With kind regards,
    Willem-Jan

  • B200 M3 memory stuck at 1333MHz in performance mode

    Hello,
    We have 2 B200 M3s in a new deployment running 2.0(3a). The B200s are configured with 64GB using 8GB DIMMs, using BANK 0 of each channel. We've deployed a BIOS policy specifying performance mode for LV DDR, and confirmed this setting took effect within the BIOS, yet the memory continues to run at 1333MHz. When looking at the server inventory, the DIMMs are reported as dual rank 8GB 1600MHz DIMMs. We've tried forcing the DIMMs to low-voltage mode and back to performance mode to no avail.
    In other UCS environments, we've deployed these same blades with the same memory configuration and BIOS policy and had no issues getting the RAM to run full speed. We're not using any kind of power capping either.
    Thoughts?

    Hi Brad,
    What CPU is being used?  3 of the supported CPU's for the B200-M3 do not support 1600 Mhz:
    http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/unified_computing/ucs/hw/chassis/install/B200M3.html#wp1028500
    Mike

Maybe you are looking for

  • Spinning beach ball woes on 27 inch iMac

    We have a mid 2010 27 inch iMac (and also a late 2010 13 inch MacBook Air, from which I am writing this post). About 6 months ago it was starting to get spinning beach balls, which I attributed to not having updated the OS (then 10.7). Having upgrade

  • No internet with Time Capsule

    I cant get internet through my time capsule. When i run network diagnostics, the network status says that: Airport, Airport Settings, Network Settings and ISP are fine, but the Internet and Server have failed. I use a cable modem from virgin media.

  • WebLogic returns funny characters in XML

    Hi, I have an application developed on Tomcat that includes a servlet that receives and XML post, processes the XML, then constructs an XML response packet (using JDOM) and flushes the response packet back to the calling process. This worked great un

  • Financial reports grid

    I am have planing application in which accounts dimension has Text field members say Project justification i.e. whenever project gets budgeted,business user wants to give justification for project. In Financial reporting, I want to report on project

  • How to delete an AppointmentItem without using AppointmentItem.Delete() method?

    As per MSDN, we cannot use AppointmentItem.Delete() inside Close() event handler method of AppointmentItem. I need to find a way to delete this AppointmentItem (or preventing it from getting saved to Outlook calender). Please let me know if you have