Is there any failover/load balancing among kjs engines on a single ias server?

I guess the question pretty much says it all. To be more explicit, if a kjs engine crashes, would all requests in progress be re-attempted on a different kjs?
Also, at what level is the user session information stored (kjs, kxs)?
Thanks a lot

hi Mihai,
Yes, we do have a load balancing mechanism between the KJSs in a single instance of the appserver. Requests from the kxs engine will be load balanced in a round robin fashion to the KJS engines.
Note that if a KJS engine crashes, then the requests will be directed to the other KJS engines, but if the KJS engine is 'hanging', then this redirection does not happen.
If the sessions are distributed, then they are stored in the KXS, but if they are lite, then they are stored in the KJS engine.
Hope that helps,
Vasanth

Similar Messages

Hot to do Failover/Load balance on CORBA C++ Client

I have a corba C++ client using Bea/Tuxedo 8.0 ORB talking to stateless session beans
on Weblogic Server 6.1/sp2.
Question:
If the wls server(s) is a cluster, how do I use this feature in my C++ client to
provide the failover/load balance?
Will the rmic generate idl which is cluster-aware if the EJBs are clustered?
Any help is appreciated.
Thanks,
steve

"steve" <[email protected]> writes:
I have a corba C++ client using Bea/Tuxedo 8.0 ORB talking to stateless session beans
on Weblogic Server 6.1/sp2.
Question:
If the wls server(s) is a cluster, how do I use this feature in my C++ client to
provide the failover/load balance?Currently, although the information is available to the client it does
not use it. This will probably change in a future release of Tuxedo,
but you should talk to your sales rep for details.
For now you can get some degree of failover by catching the
COMM_FAILURE exception and re-looking up CosNaming and your bean.
Will the rmic generate idl which is cluster-aware if the EJBs are clustered?The information is provided dynamically at runtime, so its independent
of the IDL.
andy

AS01- is there any batch loading for asset card creation?

Hi All,
I need advise here, is there any batch loading for end user to create asset card in SAP in Batch?
As from AS01, it only allows one creation each time, it will waste a lot of end user time if there're many inventories to be converted to Fixed asset for leasing purposes.

Hi Davie,
Hope you have completed your certification,
In AS01 screen you will see field "No of similar Assets" which refers to the count of assets you want create.
Enter the number of similar assets you want to create at this point of time.
Else Build LSMW around AS01.
Hope it helps,
Pankaj B

Is there any JavaEE sample application somewhere which can be runnable by Weblogic server ?

Is there any JavaEE sample application somewhere which can be runnable by Weblogic server ?
I would like to learn how JavaEE application and framework work on Weblogic.
Or is there any e-learnign seminar or how to video ?

Is Google broken for you?
Just search for them (e.g. 'weblogic java ee tutorial') and you will find more than you can use.
https://netbeans.org/kb/docs/web/jsf-jpa-weblogic.html
http://www.oracle.com/webfolder/technetwork/tutorials/obe/jdev/obe11jdev/11/oepe11g/introeclipseide.htm

IP failover, load balancing and notification...

Pretend I have the following setup/hardware:
Two intel xserves running 10.4. One is for http traffic the other https. The http server contains a static html website while the other server has a large dynamic database driven website and all of its pages require ssl encryption. I'll refer to the first as server 1 and server 2 for the other.
Now I want to implement a solution for providing high availability and performance.
If I wanted IP failover I would need two additional servers, one for the first webserver and the second for the other. Likewise if I wanted to address load balancing I would also need two additional servers, one for server 1 the other for server 2. Now my questions:
1) It seems implementing load balancing as described on page 32 of Apples High Availability pdf that this would also provide high availability like IP failover does. If two additional servers were purchased to provide high availability via a load balancing strategy would there be any need to implement IP failover? Does load balancing provide the same benefits as IP failover when talking about high availability? When if ever would one need to implement both strategies?
2) Can you somehow provide IP failover with only one server as the backup using the setup above (a third server to provide IP failover for both servers 1 and 2)? Assume the third server has all the data of both server 1 and server 2.
3) Is it possible to have Server Admin or Raid admin notify you of a problem via calling your cell phone or sending you a text message as opposed to only email, maybe via a third party solution? I think (not 100% sure) APC offers this when the power left in their batteries reaches a certain level.
Thanks.
G5 xserve Mac OS X (10.4.8)

1) There's generally no need to implement IP Failover at the server level if you're already using a separate load balancing solution. The load balancer should be able to take care of dealing with a failed server.
2) Good question - it's not clear whether IPFailover will failover for one machine or more than one.
3) Most cellphone providers offer an email-to-SMS gateway, allowing you to send an email to an email address that's forwarded to your phone as a text message. Check your cellphone provider for details on what that email address might be (e.g. Cingular uses <phonenumber>@cingularme.com, Verizon uses <phonenumber>@msg.myvzw.com, etc.

Cisco RV016 Failover & Load Balance Multi WAN Issue

Hi,
I think the RV016 is the correct device to buy for our small building but I am a little confused from the manual whether my intended configuration is possible, so if you could confirm if this is possible I would appreciate it.
We have a leased line as our primary connection (lets call it WAN1). If this connection is available I don't want to load balance on any other WAN.
We have 2 identical netgear 4G devices (call them WAN 2 and WAN 3). If the leased line is unavailable, I would like to then load balance these two WAN connections.
I then have a final connection, WAN4 as a slow adsl backup line. I do not know at present whether I want to load balance this in a WAN1 failure or just have it as a backup to WAN2 and WAN3 (WAN2 and WAN3 have a 20gb data limit each on their monthly contract allowance, if the leased line is down for more than a couple of days, which has unfortunately happened before, then we will hit this limit and then need to face either extremely expensive data charges or just use the ADSL alone)
Anyway, bottom line is under normal conditions I don't want to load balance. I only want to load balance WAN2 and WAN3 in the case of WAN1 failure.
Does anyone know if this is possible? If not, is there any other similar device which would suit?
Thank you
Ben

Hi Bencarroll01,
With RV016 you can achieve what you need.
RV016 support up to 7 WAN connection, and there is two working mode
Intelligent Balancer (Auto Mode): Select this option to balance traffic between all interfaces to increase the available bandwidth. The router balances the traffic between the interfaces in a weighted round robin fashion.
IP Group (By Users): Select this option to group traffic on each WAN interface by priority levels or classes of service (CoS). With this feature, you can ensure bandwidth and higher priority for the specified services and users. All traffic that is not added to the IP Group uses Intelligent Balancer mode. To specify the services and users, click the Edit icon for the WAN interface and then add protocol binding entries for each service, IP address, or range of IP addresses.
For our case we need to have RV016 configured with IP Group(By User) so in this case we can configure Protocol binding which we can specify and force all the traffic coming from any IP address from the local network going outside through WAN1. and other WAN connection they always UP but not traffic passing through them
now if WAN1 is Down, immediately the Rule for redirecting traffic to WAN 1 will be Disabled and all the traffic will be passing through the rest of the WAN connection
After that if the WAN1 is UP again the rule of protocol binding will be active again and again all the traffic will be through WAN 1
Please let me know if you have any others questions
Please rate this post or marked as answered to help other Cisco customers
Greetings
Mehdi

Best Option (if any) for Load Balancing Distribution Point(s) on Same LAN

Hey Guys -
I've got a simple question this time. We use SCCM 2012 R2, manage ~800 systems at 3 locations, but perform most work at our main office where this scenario takes place. Here, we have a single DP on-site which is a separate VM than our Primary
which is also local.
Recently, our PC Lab tried running our OSD TS on 16 systems which were each started 1-2 minutes apart. When run on a single brand new PC connected via GB network, the OSD TS takes a couple of hours to complete so with 16 it really caused some
issues. We had a couple of Programs/Packages/Applications which actually timed out due to the default 120 minute max run time. We don't usually image 16 at a time, but often do 2-3 at once so are looking to find a solution to speed things up anyways.
My Question
What is the best solution / method for implementing any type of load balancing on a single LAN? I'm not asking for true load balancing, but simply any solution where multiple systems running a TS can pull from more than a single local source if possible.
We do not use multicasting and from what I've been told it will not be a possibility as it causes havoc on networks so it's out. I know that some clients can share content depending on deployment configuration, but don't know how / if this applies to OSD
Task Sequences.
Any suggestions or ideas? Thanks!
Ben K.

Agree, 16 machines is not a lot. I would normally go for about 2000 machines per DP depending on pkg/img size etc. Whats the size of that rebuild? Image + packages? Do you do a full DL before starting or is it started from WinPE?
Our BranchCache tools will of course help, regardless of how fast your gig link is since data will be pulled from more sources, but think your issue is more network related? If the images is 5 gig and you add another 5 gig of packges in the sequence a 1Gb/s
link should pull that 16 * 10GB=160GB in about half an hour. So think dont think you are having 1Gb/s from server to clients.
//Andreas
http://2pintSoftware.com

Resources for designing redundancy and load balancing among data centers

Hello all,
I'm looking for resources for designing redundancy and load balancing between two physically separate data centers. I'm looking for some "best practice" links, tips, or recommendations. Any suggestions are appreciated!
Thanks.

I think that we can do per packet load balancing by using CEF.
Please go to the following URL:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122cgcr/fswtch_c/swprt1/xcfcefc.htm#xtocid5
Also, you may need local director or distributed director. What resource/application is availalbe in the data centre? (e.g. http server, ftp server, TN3270 server, and so on)

How can I design Load Balancing for distant Datacenters? without single point of failure

Dear Experts,
We are using the following very old and passive method of redundancy for our cload SaaS but it's time to make it approperiate. Can youplease advise:
Current issues:
1. No load balancing. IP selection is based on primary and secondary IP configurations. If Primary fails to respond, IP record for DNS changes to secondary IP with TTL=1min
2. When primary server fails, it takes around 15 min for clients to access the servers. Way too long!
The target:
A. Activate a load balancing mechanism to utilized the stand-by server.
B. How can the solution be designed to avoid single point of failure? In the previous example, UltraDNS is a single point of failure.
C. If using GSS is the solution, how can it be designed in both server locations (for active redundancy) using ordinary DNS server?
D. How can HSRP, GSS, GSLB, and/or VIP be used? What would be the best solution?
Servers are running ORACLE DB, MS SQL, and tomcat with 2x SAN of 64TB each.

Hi Codlick,
the answer is, you cannot (switch to two web dispatchers).
If you want to use two web dispatchers, they need something in front, like a hardware load balancer. This would actually work, as WD know their sessions and sticky servers for those. But remember you always need a single point for the incoming address (ip).
Your problem really is about switchover groups. Both WD need to run in different switchover groups and need to switch to the same third software. I'm not sure if your switchover software can handle this (I'm not even sure if anyone can do this...), as this means the third WD needs to be in two switchover groups at the same time.
Hope this helps,
Regards,
Benny

Solution load Balancing for two Servers run Sun One Web Server 7.0

Hi All ,
I must configure load balancing web server for two server . Could you tell me Solution ?
Please help
Thanks .

The following should help you configure Web Server to reverse proxy (load balance) to your two backend servers.
[http://blogs.sun.com/amit/entry/setting_up_a_reverse_proxy|http://blogs.sun.com/amit/entry/setting_up_a_reverse_proxy]

Load balancing multiple SSO mid-tier with single SSO database

I want to load balance SSO middle tier servers and have them access a single SSO database. When you install infrastructure and select SSO only it creates a new infrastructure database. How can I install multiple SSO servers and point them to a single database. I am doing Load Balancing with F5 and read an Oracle WP where they mentioned an Oracle supported configuration where they load balanced SSO servers with F5.
KB

Two possible solutions:
1.) Oracle 10gAS Enterprise Deployment Guide (B13998-03) follow the configuration for SSO configuration in Chapter 5.
2.) I have not tried this but it should be logically possible with the SSO. 10gAS Administrators guide (B13995-05) Part III Advanced Administration. The success of this method assumes you have OID and SSO each installed in separate homes. You would be cloning the SSO home to another box as if it were a middle tier (it is still part of the infrastructure) then re-configuring it on the new box.
Personally solution 1 is the best method. We are using F5 Big-IP with this configuration and it is working great.
Hope this helps!

Is there any way to manage multiple CC memberships from a single account?

Is there any way for all our CC accounts to be managed by a single account, to manage things such as billing, etc? It would save my company time and confusion when we have to do things such as set up a new credit card number (which we would have to do to every single account). Thanks, Mike

Team license links that may help
-http://www.adobe.com/creativecloud/buy/business.html
-manage your team account http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1460939?tstart=0

Is there any profiles let my code work effect but don't bounce server?

Hi all,
I shoule add some functions to a standard page in r12.
As we can only debug on server.
It's so trouble that i should bounce server frequently after update code.
Is there any profiles or parameters let my code work effect but don't bounce server?
thanks ,
Tao

Hi Tao,
I wish it were like that!
It also depends on the type of changes you are deploying. If you have MDS related changes, them only importing the files should b e enough(at times though you still need to bounce server). In case of BC4J files, there is no other option.
Regards
Sumit

Is there any recommended maximum number of deployed application to a single user/computer?

Hi!
As the title says, i wonder if there is any recommended maximum number of deployed application to a single user/computer?
I have about 60-70 applications in my environment, how would the performance be affected if I would make these available for all computers or users to install? I guess its only the client that would be affected right?
How intense is the process that checks if applications is installed, applicable etc..
Thanks!
//Samus

There will be n/w Performance impact, consider if all the applications are being downloaded on the machines for install by users since its Available install ,consider few users are initiating the install from application catalog for few application
then it will impact the n/w performance, various things are also into considered.
Kamala kannan.c| Please remember to click “Mark as Answer” or Vote as Helpful if its helpful for you. |Disclaimer: This posting is provided with no warranties and confers no rights

Load balancing among multiple CPU

I am using a java based application on windows server 2008 r2 64bit and JRE 6u17.The server has multiple processor.But when we run the application only one cpu takes the 100% load and cant balance the load.But if we run the application on windows xp or server 2003 the application can balance the among the CPU.
Any one noticed this type of issue before or any one know the reason???
Thanks

Your application probably has one thread that is CPU-intensive.
If that's the case, the "balanced" CPU utilization you see on Windows is caused by unnecessary context switches. And thus your app runs slower than it otherwise would.
If your app is spinning like crazy in a single CPU, does it really matter which one it's spinning in?

Is there any failover/load balancing among kjs engines on a single ias server?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for