Issue in Creation of Periodicals for Contracts in CRM7.0

Hello,
I have a requirement to create Contracts in CRM7.0 system.
And I am doing this using the BAPI *BAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTI*
Good part is Contract Order gets created, but onlywith Header Details.
The issues i am facing --
1. I need to know what kind/type of data must be passed to the interface parameters, the F1 Help/Documentation is vague.
2. I am passing data in the INPUT FIELDS structure with the Object ID, Handle Number, Reference GUID and Fieldname,
here what does 'Logical Key' field indicate? What should be passed here.
What does 'REFERENCE KIND' field indicate, i have been passng 'A' for everything (to be frank i dont know whats its significance is!!).
3. With so much, My Order gets created but with less than half details, i.e. the Objects not getting created are - Partner, Product, terms/appointments, Status, LongTexts......
Any help/inputs would be appreciated.
Hope my problem is stated clearly ...
--Regards
Dedeepya

Hi Anu,
i found my solution by debugging with existing data or while creating it in CRMD_ORDER.
Ensure that you are passing a correct entry in INPUT_FIELDS structure.
As i haven't worked on rebates i woudlnt be able to help you, I suggest you debug to arrive at a solution.
You can preset your break-points at :-
1. FM - CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN
2. CRM_ORDER_MAINTAIN_MULTI_OW -- Debug through the complete FM.
3. CRM_ORDER_PREPARE_MULTI_OW -- The data is set in this function module.
Regards
Dedeepya C

Similar Messages

Sales Order Creation for Contracts

Hi,
When I execute FM 'CRMXIF_ORDER_SAVE', it is going to dump with error
"Inconsistency between Dictionary types "CRMXIF_BUSTRANS_ITEM_T". "
if someone could help me sorting this out that would be great.
I would also like to know if there is any other FMs for creation of order for contracts.
Thx,
Vinod

Hi Vinod,
You need to pass the input fields for every field you populate.
Here is the corrected code. I have marked the modifications in BOLD.
**Passing sample data to those internal tables to test.
it_organisation-dis_channel = '01'.
it_organisation-division = '01'.
it_organisation-sales_org = 'PAT'.
it_organisation-sales_org_resp = 'PAT'.
APPEND it_organisation.
*it_products-partner_prod = '28811'.
*APPEND it_products.
CALL FUNCTION 'GUID_CREATE'
IMPORTING
EV_GUID_16 =
EV_GUID_22 =
ev_guid_32 = zguid_32.
it_header-guid = zguid_32.
it_header-process_type = 'ZWK8'.
it_header-logical_system = 'C4DCLNT200'.
it_header-posting_date = '20060525'.
APPEND it_header.
<b>*HEADER INPUT FIELDS
IT_INPUT_FIELDS-REF_GUID = ZGUID_32.
IT_INPUT_FIELDS-OBJECTNAME = 'A'. (A for header and B for item)
IT_INPUT_FIELDS-OBJECTNAME = 'ORDERADM_H'.
IT_INPUT_FIELDS-FIELDNAME = 'GUID'.
APPEND IT_INPUT_FIELDS.
IT_INPUT_FIELDS-REF_GUID = ZGUID_32.
IT_INPUT_FIELDS-OBJECTNAME = 'A'. (A for header and B for item)
IT_INPUT_FIELDS-OBJECTNAME = 'ORDERADM_H'.
IT_INPUT_FIELDS-FIELDNAME = 'PROCESS_TYPE'.
APPEND IT_INPUT_FIELDS.
IT_INPUT_FIELDS-REF_GUID = ZGUID_32.
IT_INPUT_FIELDS-OBJECTNAME = 'A'. (A for header and B for item)
IT_INPUT_FIELDS-OBJECTNAME = 'ORDERADM_H'.
IT_INPUT_FIELDS-FIELDNAME = 'LOGICAL_SYSTEM'.
APPEND IT_INPUT_FIELDS.
IT_INPUT_FIELDS-REF_GUID = ZGUID_32.
IT_INPUT_FIELDS-OBJECTNAME = 'A'. (A for header and B for item)
IT_INPUT_FIELDS-OBJECTNAME = 'ORDERADM_H'.
IT_INPUT_FIELDS-FIELDNAME = 'POSTING_DATE'.
APPEND IT_INPUT_FIELDS.
ORGMAN INPUT FIELDS
IT_INPUT_FIELDS-REF_GUID = ZGUID_32.
IT_INPUT_FIELDS-OBJECTNAME = 'A'. (A for header and B for item)
IT_INPUT_FIELDS-OBJECTNAME = 'ORGMAN'.
IT_INPUT_FIELDS-FIELDNAME = 'DIS_CHANNEL'.
APPEND IT_INPUT_FIELDS.
IT_INPUT_FIELDS-REF_GUID = ZGUID_32.
IT_INPUT_FIELDS-OBJECTNAME = 'A'. (A for header and B for item)
IT_INPUT_FIELDS-OBJECTNAME = 'ORGMAN'.
IT_INPUT_FIELDS-FIELDNAME = 'DIVISION'.
APPEND IT_INPUT_FIELDS.
IT_INPUT_FIELDS-REF_GUID = ZGUID_32.
IT_INPUT_FIELDS-OBJECTNAME = 'A'. (A for header and B for item)
IT_INPUT_FIELDS-OBJECTNAME = 'ORGMAN'.
IT_INPUT_FIELDS-FIELDNAME = 'SALES_ORG'
APPEND IT_INPUT_FIELDS.
IT_INPUT_FIELDS-REF_GUID = ZGUID_32.
IT_INPUT_FIELDS-OBJECTNAME = 'A'. (A for header and B for item)
IT_INPUT_FIELDS-OBJECTNAME = 'ORGMAN'.
IT_INPUT_FIELDS-FIELDNAME = 'SALES_ORG_RESP'.
APPEND IT_INPUT_FIELDS.</b>
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_BUSPROCESSND_CREATEMULTI'
TABLES
header = it_header
ITEM =
ACTIVITY =
sales = it_sales
PARTNER =
organisation = it_organisation
SHIPPING =
APPOINTMENT =
TEXT =
SERVICE_OS =
STATUS =
<b>INPUT_FIELDS = IT_INPUT_FIELDS</b>
CREATED_PROCESS =
RETURN = it_return
LEAD =
OPPORTUNITY =
PRODUCT =
SCHEDULELINE =
CUSTOMER_HEAD =
CUSTOMER_ITEM =
PRICING =
PRICING_ITEM =
CONDITION_CREATE =
BILLING =
CONFIG_CFG =
CONFIG_BLB =
CONFIG_INS =
CONFIG_PRT =
CONFIG_VAL =
CONFIG_VK =
CONFIG_REF =
ADDRESS =
BILLPLAN =
BILLPLAN_DATE =
EXTENSIONIN =
DOCUMENT_FLOW =
BATCH =
PRICING_AGR_CRM =
FINPROD_ITEM =
CANCEL =
CANCEL_IR =
PRODUCT_LIST =
products = it_products
OBJECTS =
PAYPLAN =
PAYPLAN_DATE =
CONFIG_FILTER_CFG =
CONFIG_FILTER_INS =
CONFIG_FILTER_PRT =
CONFIG_FILTER_VAL =
ACTIVITY_I =
it_objectstosave-guid = it_header-guid.
APPEND it_objectstosave.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_BUSPROCESSND_SAVE'
EXPORTING
update_task_local = ' '
save_frame_log = 'X'
IMPORTING
log_handle = l_log_handle
TABLES
objects_to_save = it_objectstosave
saved_objects = it_savedobjects
return = it_return.
IF NOT it_savedobjects[] IS INITIAL.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'
EXPORTING
wait = 'X'.
IMPORTING
RETURN =
ENDIF.
IF sy-subrc = 0.
ENDIF.

Extended search for contracts

When I select a purchasing organisation in the extended search criteria, the search results returned are those that are expected. However if I change the purchasing org the old value is retained. If I delete the old value and search again it is put back into the search field by the system. Also, when I choose a product category sometimes the results give me all the contracts when I am expecting no results.
We have applied notes 1088749 and 1067327...still the issue persists....
Is there a new note for this issue?
Regards
Vinay Sridhar

to go into details:
I am facing the following issue when trying to search for contracts or global outline agreement:
When I try to search for a contract after clicking the Extended search...I enter a purch. organisation and some results are displayed.
However if I change the purchasing org the old value is retained. If I delete the old value and search again it is put back into the search field by the system.
Also, when I choose a product category sometimes the results give me all the contracts when I am expecting no results.
We have applied notes 1088749 and 1067327...still the issue persists....
Is there a new note for this issue?

NEED BAPI FOR SALES CONTRACT CREATION AND EXTRACTION FOR Trans- PA41& PA43

Hi All,
I need the BAPI for T-code PA41 and PA43 for sales contract.
i would like to extract all the contract details for Contract data contains Table VEDA. And need to create contract.
Any body please help me out...
Please give me code if any one have how to do mapping ..
Thank you,
Vishnu.

Hi Vichu,
Please search on SCN.
Regards
Abhii

Issue in Creation of XML file from ABAP data

Hi,
I need to create a XML file, but am not facing some issues in creation of XML file, the in the required format.
The required format is
-<Header1 1st field= u201CValueu201D 2nd field= u201CValueu201D>
   - <Header2 1st field= u201CValueu201D 2nd field= u201CValueu201Du2026u2026. Upto 10 fields>
          <Header3 1st field= u201CValueu201D 2nd field= u201CValueu201Du2026u2026. Upto 6 fields/>
          <Header4 1st field= u201CValueu201D 2nd field= u201CValueu201Du2026u2026. Upto 4 fields/.>
           <Header5 1st field= u201CValueu201D 2nd field= u201CValueu201Du2026u2026. Upto 6 fields/>
      </Header2>
   </Header1>
Iu2019m using the call transformation to convert ABAP data to XML file.
So please anybody can help how to define XML structure in transaction XSLT_TOOL.
And one more thing, here I need to put the condition to display the Header 3, Header 4, Header 5 values. If there is no record for a particular line item in header 3, 4 & 5, I donu2019t want to display full line items; this is only for Header 3, 4 & 5.
Please help me in this to get it resolved.

Hello,
you can use CALL TRANSFORMATION id, which will create a exact "print" of the ABAP data into the XML.
If you need to change the structure of XML, you can alter your ABAP structure to match the requirements.
Of course you can create your own XSLT but that is not that easy to describe and nobody will do that for you around here. If you would like to start with XSLT, you´d better start the search.
Regards Otto

Issue In Creation Licence.

Dear All,
I got The Issue In Creation of License as " Enter valid SP/SH ".
Even I have Maintained Prefix Zeros.
Here SP and SH both are Different, If I enter SP and SH as same system accepts, if not error is triggered.
Both SP and SH maintained Customer Excise details.
Please give me your suggestions.
Regards,
Siva krishna B
<Text removed by Moderator for sharing personal details>
Message was edited by: Jyoti Prakash

Hi
Assign Ship to party code to the Corresponding Sold to party in customer master under Partner function Tab
and Create the New License then system will accept

Issue in creation of data from extended segment in background mode

Dear all,
I am facing an issue in creation of data in receiving system using IDOC for an xtended matmas segment(Extended for classification view in user exit).The issue is that the idoc is received successfully in r3eceiving system but not created successfuly in data base .(Though it is shown green/successful).When i execute this from we19 the data is created successfuly in data base.I will be thankful if you can guide me resolve issue.
Thanks.

Hello,
you can use CALL TRANSFORMATION id, which will create a exact "print" of the ABAP data into the XML.
If you need to change the structure of XML, you can alter your ABAP structure to match the requirements.
Of course you can create your own XSLT but that is not that easy to describe and nobody will do that for you around here. If you would like to start with XSLT, you´d better start the search.
Regards Otto

Issue in enabling dbx rtc for memory leak analysis

Any help on this is highly appreciated ...
Following is the issue:
pass@odcsmoke1> dbx -C xfer
changes (topic)
The major new features of this release relative to 6.1 are:
o The dbx environment variable "rtc_use_traps" has been removed.
Traps are used automatically as long as the hardware is UltraSparc.
o There is now some basic support for looking at core files from
different versions of Solaris. See `help core mismatch' for details.
o Stepping to a specific function support. See `help step to' for details.
o Fortran intrinsics support on Intel has been removed.
o Dbx automatically translates some old dbxenv variables to their new
names. See `help dbxenv' for details.
o The default command-line editing mode is now emacs. See "How do I enable
command-line editing?" in FAQ for details (`help FAQ').
o Two new collector commands have been implemented: `pause' and `resume'.
See `help collector' for details.
o The collector enable_once command has been removed.
o The collector store command has been extended to include experiment groups.
See also `help changes61'
To suppress this message, add the following line to your .dbxrc file:
dbxenv suppress_startup_message 6.2
Reading xfer
Reading ld.so.1
Reading librtc.so
Reading libm.so.1
Reading libnsl.so.1
Reading libresolv.so.2
Reading libc.so.1
Reading libgen.so.1
Reading libdl.so.1
Reading librt.so.1
Reading libpthread.so.1
Reading libthread.so.1
Reading libsocket.so.1
Reading libxfermain.so
Reading libpass.so
Reading libarsapic.so
Reading libarsrecordc.so
Reading libiaconfig.so
Reading libarsconfig.so
Reading libclientsock.so
Reading libaio.so.1
Reading libmd5.so.1
detected a multithreaded program
(/opt/SUNWspro/bin/../WS6U2/bin/sparcv9/dbx) check -all
access checking - ON
memuse checking - ON
(/opt/SUNWspro/bin/../WS6U2/bin/sparcv9/dbx) check -leaks
leaks checking - ON
(/opt/SUNWspro/bin/../WS6U2/bin/sparcv9/dbx) stop in main
More than one identifier 'main'.
Select one of the following:
0) Cancel
1) `xfer`xfer.c`main
2) `libxfermain.so`xfer.c`main
a) All
1(2) stop in main
-d ecpix.conf -g y -P n <
Running: xfer -f rbi_1.cfg -d ecpix.conf -g y -P n
(process id 33)
dbx: warning: A threaded program is not initializing libthread first!
*/opt/SUNWspro/WS6U2/lib/dbxruntime/librtc.so came before it.*
dbx: warning: A threaded program is not initializing libthread first!
/lib/libc.so.1 came before it.
dbx: warning: A threaded program is not initializing libthread first!
/lib/libnsl.so.1 came before it.
dbx: warning: A threaded program is not initializing libthread first!
/lib/libsocket.so.1 came before it.
dbx: warning: A threaded program is not initializing libthread first!
/lib/libresolv.so.2 came before it.
dbx: warning: A threaded program is not initializing libthread first!
/lib/libgen.so.1 came before it.
dbx: warning: A threaded program is not initializing libthread first!
/lib/libaio.so.1 came before it.
dbx: warning: A threaded program is not initializing libthread first!
/lib/libmd5.so.1 came before it.
dbx: warning: A threaded program is not initializing libthread first!
/lib/librt.so.1 came before it.
dbx: warning: A threaded program is not initializing libthread first!
/usr/pass/lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/libpass.so came before it.
dbx: warning: A threaded program is not initializing libthread first!
/usr/pass/lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/libclientsock.so came before it.
dbx: warning: A threaded program is not initializing libthread first!
/usr/pass/lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/libarsrecordc.so came before it.
dbx: warning: A threaded program is not initializing libthread first!
/usr/pass/lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/libiaconfig.so came before it.
dbx: warning: A threaded program is not initializing libthread first!
/usr/pass/lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/libarsapic.so came before it.
dbx: warning: A threaded program is not initializing libthread first!
/usr/pass/lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/libarsconfig.so came before it.
dbx: warning: A threaded program is not initializing libthread first!
/usr/pass/lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/libxfermain.so came before it.
dbx: warning: A threaded program is not initializing libthread first!
/usr/pass/etc/xfer came before it.
stopped in main at line 461 in file "xfer.c"
461 CHAR *Etc_Dir="/usr/pass/etc/";
(/opt/SUNWspro/bin/../WS6U2/bin/sparcv9/dbx) showmemuse
dbx: warning: check -leaks/-memuse must be issued before the run command for showmemuse to be used(/opt/SUNWspro/bin/../WS6U2/bin/sparcv9/dbx)
pass@odcsmoke1> uname -a
SunOS odcsmoke1 5.10 Generic_118822-30 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-V250

Andrew is right, dbx 6.2 is very old; technically, it is supported on Solaris 10, but as you can see for yourself, there are issues to be fixed.
Only limited support is available for this version, so if you have a support contract, please report this problem through the support channel. Better yet (and in case if you don't have support contract), upgrade to a more modern version. Since you are on Solaris 10, I'd recommend latest version of Sun Studio - 12 update 1; it is free for all uses and can be downloaded from here: http://developers.sun.com/sunstudio/downloads/.
Should you have any questions about the upgrade, please post it here.

Open Qty for Contracts in Purchasing

Hi,
Is there a standard config for Open Target Quantities for Contracts, as there is for standard POs (there is Open Qty - 0BO_QTY - within the 0PUR_DS03 transformation), but I need to show an Open Target Qty for Contracts.
The value exists within RM06A, field name OFZMG but it is not part of the standard Purchasing extractors, whereas the Target Qty is.
Any advise appreciated.
Thanks,
Scott

Hi Daniel,
Thanks for the reply.
Yeah, I know how to enhance the standard extractors but the logistics extractors are different where the standard LIS extractors actually contain a whole load of additional fields that you can ehnance via LBWE.
If I enhance these with the append structure and some code, then it could cause issues with enhancing via the standard LBWE in the future.
Thanks,
Scott

Release Strategy for Contract is not getting picked whereas it is ok for PO

Dear Experts,
I have created release strategy for PO with doc type, p.org, net value as chars and frg_ekko as class and release group as 02.
I kept NB,FO,MK and WK as char values. it is working fine for PO's whereas it is not getting picked for Contracts. we need same release strategy for PO as well as for Contract.
Kindly resolve the issue.
Satish

S0004830404 wrote:
Dear Experts,
>
> I have created release strategy for PO with doc type, p.org, net value as chars and frg_ekko as class and release group as 02.
> I kept NB,FO,MK and WK as char values. it is working fine for PO's whereas it is not getting picked for Contracts. we need same release strategy for PO as well as for Contract.
>
> Kindly resolve the issue.
>
> Satish
hi,
use create other characteristic for value CEKKO-GNETW in this use the mk , wk values in value field and assign this characteristic to your class and save.
Thanking you

Issues during Component Batch Determination for Process Orders

Hi,
I am encountering a strange issue during component batch determination of process order.
1. During creation of process order, when I execute batch determination, systems does determination based on strategies we have set and when I click on Copy it gives an error
"Log cannot be saved: Object/subobject not specified"
Message no. BL201
*Diagnosis
Log save cancelled because at least one log contains no object or subobject.
Object and subobject are needed to classify application logs because there are several log types. Only a few logs are managed in main memory at runtime, so this classification is not needed.
If the logs are to be saved in the database, object/subobject must be specified for later retrieval.
Procedure for System Administration
Object/sub object can be passed when a log is created (function module BAL_LOG_CREATE) and changed with BAL_LOG_CHANGE.
The possible values for object and sub object must be configured in transaction SLG0.*
If I save the order with CRTD status and come back again in change mode and do determination, It works fine.
Again when the order is in REL status and do the determination, It gives the same error.
This happens only for a specific plant, In other plants batch determination works in all scenarios.
I checked for all plant related Config for batch determination and coudn't find any discrepancies.
Please advise how to resolve this issue. Thanks in advance for your help
Regards,
Aheesh

There Is no direct solution for your requirement just try this work around.
While defining the batch determination search strategy for process order in COB1, there is one column Quantity proposal where you can attach the Routines (This is written in ABAB code ) make use of this, define New Routines with ABAB help to fulfill your requirement. Try this if found useful award full points.
Regards,
Ajay Nikte

Po Creation With Reference to contract

Dear Experts
We are creating the purchase order with reference to contract the contract quantity not copied to po. it is asking to enter the qty. but it should copy the contract quantity. the same contract price also not copied to po. it is copying from the info record price.
my scenario is at the time of po creation with reference to contract it should copy the contract qty and price any copy control assignment is there or any other settings required.
Please help
Regards
Anand

Hi,
If a contract with one of your principal vendors exists for a material, you can create purchase orders referencing this contract. Purchase orders created in this way are called contract release orders.
The price, vendor data, terms of payment, delivery costs, and any instructions to the vendor are adopted from the contract automatically.
If you have created the contract & info records is also exists then system will give priority to contract to determine the conditions.
Please check the source list ,whether contract is maintained over there or not.
Thanks,
AMIT

Issue in Calculation schema determination for Scheduling Agreements

Dear All,
I am facing an issue in Calculation schema determination for Scheduling Agreements. The issue is -
"Appropriate calculation schema is not being determined when a scheduling agreement is being created"
The required settings which have been maintained are - The Calculation Schema (ZEIC31) has been created, Vendor Schema group has been created, Purchasing Organisation Schema group has been created, They both have been assigned to the Calculation schema in Schema determination, The Vendor Schema group has been assigned to the Vendor Master Record in master data creation.
When I am creating the scheduling agreement, the system is by default choosing the calculation schema - RM0002. Thus I am not able to put the manual condition types which have been assigned in the calculation schema - ZEIC31.
1> On what logic is the system picking that calculation schema?
2> What settings can I do to make it pick that calculation schema only which has been assigned with POrg Sch Gp and Ve Sch Gp?
Regards,
Sudhanshu

1> On what logic is the system picking that calculation schema?
As per "Define Schema Determination" in spro Purchasing document should pick the Pricing Procedure .
After creation of scheduling agreement have chacked your values in Scheduling agreement (Purchase ORG ,Schema grp in Vendor)
2> What settings can I do to make it pick that calculation schema only which has been assigned with POrg Sch Gp and Ve Sch Gp?
Check in Vendor mater is there any Plant specific Purcahsing data maintained.If it is plant specific Check purchasing data for that Plant.

CLM - Maximum File Size for Contract Documents

We did a search but did not find an answer for this. For the CLM system does anybody know SAP's recommendation on the maximum file size that the application can reliably handle for contract documents? We recently increased the maximum file size from 10MB to 50MB to accommodate a larger than allowed file size. Now the business has requested the capacity to add files (pdf files) up to 115MB. Would increasing our file limit to approximately 150MB be within the recommended parameters?

There is no specific recommendation for maximum file sizes as this depends on how your time-out parameters are set, your server resources and network (also tunneling policies). The fact is the higher the filesize the more risk you run in unreliable uploads. Compressing files before uploading is a good practise for larger files.
These are the same issues which you would run into if you for example upload to a sharepoint site or even a copy on a shared drive, it all depends on the same parameters.
Tunneling policies could also affect your performance as it will limit the upload speeds according the priority set on certain network activities and if it limits your bandwidth you run in the risk of time-out so as you see there is no straight answer to your question. I know customers who can without no problem upload 150Mb files and others who already have issues with 50Mb.
Unfortunate, as I do not know your architecture and infrastructure I can only advice to stresstest the conditions of 150 Mb uploades with several user ids and see if you get time-outs or if it degrades the network performance. One of the questions you should ask your business is how frequent are the occurences of 150Mb+ uploads and if it is the appropiate way. It could be that these are very rare and in that case you could ask them to do this outside the busy hours of the network which will provides you less risk in problems.

Late Archiving for Contract Documents via OAWD.

Hi experts,
I am now configuring Late Archiving for Contract Documents but it seems that the document attachment cannot be viewed via J6NP/J6NY. My question is concerning the Business Object. When I use standard Business Object "BUS2095", documents are stored succesfully and documents can be viewed in J6NP/J6NY. But I cannot use BUS2095 because it only has Sales Document No as input. My users require fields - Sales Document No, Contract Start Date,Sales Organisation and Distribution Channel. Therefore I created a customized Business Object with those fields.These fields were taken from a new Customised Joint table between VBAK,VEDA and VBAP.
At OAWD, I am able to archive for the Document Type I created. It says that Document stored succesfully. But the problem is when I want to view the archive document at J6NP/J6NY, there is no attachments. I tested the J6NP configuration with BUS2095 and attachment can be viewed. But with my Customised Business Object, there are no attachments.
What must I look into and what do I need to check? I really need help here. Please..

Hello,
Can you check the configuration of OAC3?
Hope you have deleted the configuration of BUS2095 assignment to document type.
Instead, creation of new archivelink configuration for custom business object and assign to document type you have used earlier.
-Thank,
Ajay

Issue in Creation of Periodicals for Contracts in CRM7.0

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for