ISSUE IN FINANCE POSTING OF WAGE TYPE

Hi
I have a problem in posting of wage type to finance.  Employee joined in 23rd Sept 09.  By the time Payroll has locked.  His payroll processed in Oct 09.  Payroll has functioned sussessfully. the wage type /3s1 was not posted correctly.the amount of /3s1 pertaining to sept 09 8 days has doubled in posting.  We checked the scenerio in Dev client.  The /3s1 wage type correctly posted without excess posting in Dev Client.
where could be the problem in Production.
Request to help in the matter
Thanks & Regards
EKP Yadav
M:9000184456

Hi,
Could you post the exact error?
thanks.
JB

Similar Messages

  • Posting the wage types globally

    Dear Experts,
    I have a scenario, where i need to post some wage types to G/L accounts of different country groups (i.e, we have our client operations in India and USA).
    Please let me know whether we can do it? If yes, let me know how we can achieve this?
    Appreciate your inputs on this.
    -Raju

    Hello!
    Yes.  I want a set of Wage Types on Infotype 0014 (Recurring Payments/Deductions) to be available for employees assigned to a couple of specific Company Codes.  These Wage Types in turn should not post to any other Company Codes other than the specific two Company Codes.
    I do hope that clarifies my question.
    Cheers!
    Ninja

  • ISSUE in basic pay arrears wage type for new joiners

    Hi Experts,
    I am facing an unusual issue as after executing payroll for new joiners from previous month(example: joining date 25.01.2015 & payroll execution date:28.02.2015) results not reflecting arrears wage types of basic pay but reflects /552 wage type and /ZF5 PF arrears wage type.
    But this issue is not happening in case of salary revision or other action which affects salary from retro date ie. basic pay arrears wage types are reflecting in RT table.
    Already analyzed similar existing discussions in the forum. 
    Kindly help me to get it resolved.
    Thanks & Regards
    Bindu...

    As mentioned earlier check the parameters for payslip to bring the arrears on payslip, For your reference check the below image where similar case employee is joined in the month of January and payroll is executed in the month of Feb with arrears same wage types will appear on payslip this is standard functionality of SAP you can find out in the image with * with out * * indicates arrears.
    let assume your basic pay is XXXX when arrears are there then another line appears with *XXXX indicates arrears similar to your case joined in the month of January and payroll executed in the month of February then one month arrears appear on payslip like above for each wage type.
    This is completely integrated with payslip design and PC00_M40_CEDT parameters which we are using for Remuneration statement variant.
    I hope you understand.
    Regards
    Venkatesh

  • UK Payroll Issue : Tax Adjustment Wage Type E501

    Hi,
    We are facing an issue when inputting Tax adjustment wage type E501 to adjust previous year's tax retroactively.
    When we enter wage type E501 with tax adjustment amount in IT0015 for the period 12 2008 ( March) and run payroll for current period ( May 2009) The remuneration Statement shows weird results.
    For example :
    For an employee we entered Wagetype E501 with amount +£20.00 with a date of 31/3/09 in May. The pay has been calculated and the tax due to be deducted in May is £568.60.  The payslip shows £588.60 (£568.60 + -£20.00) and it also shows £588.60 for a retrospective pay period (*) this figure should not appear at all.  Again the payslip does not balance but it would if the correct tax amount of £568.60 only showed on the payslip.
    E501 is purely an adjustment  to the Year to Date cumulatives it is not a deduction (or refund) to the employee and therefore should not affect the payslip.
    UK Payroll gurus please help me sort out this issue.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Anupama

    Hi Surya,
    Thanks for the reply.
    I have checked and found out that subschema ZNTO ( GNTO) contains ZEOY(GEOY) and this is how it looks. Please let me know if any changes are to be made to the PCR .
    ZEOY Adjustment to results table RT
          E101 /101 adjustment
          E112 /112 adjustment
          E121 /121 adjustment
          E501 /501 adjustment
            ADDWTE*    RT   Results table
            ADDWTE/501 RT   Results table
          E505 /505 adjustment
          E506 /506 adjustment
          ECSL /CSL EOY Adjustment
          EP20 /P20 adjustment
          EP21 /P21 adjustment
          ESPY /SPY adjustment
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Anupama

  • Travel Mgt Wage types

    Hi
    For travel Management there are standered wage types for all other countries. (Wage types started with MJ series)
    But For India, we are unable find those MJ series wage types to copy. Can any one suggest which wage types to be copied for travel Management.
    I am doing this first time and don't have any idea about this.
    Or else is there any way to make those MJ series wage types applicable to India also.
    Kumar

    Greetings All,
    I am having this same issue. I have assigned wage types to expense types via config and although the wage types show up when I view the listing in config, the wage types have no description and don't appear in the drop down list. I have checked in the HR & Payroll config and see nothing about creating wage types for Travel Management. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks
    Michelle Swindle

  • Problem in posting Er PF Wage Types generated through Retro

    Hello all,
    I am running India Payroll in ECC 6.0 with HR Package level 52.
    We have revised wages for two employees in the month of June with effect from 13.04.2010.
    Retro has run successfully for two months April & May and all the wage types are calculated and passed on for FI Posting correctly except Employer PF Wage Types.
    I am getting error while posting wages to FI as Employer PF Contribution & Employer Pension Contribution generated for April & May are not considered for FI Posting.  Only current month values are taken into account.  Whereas I don't have any problem with Employee Contribution.  /ZF5 is generated with total of past two months contribution and also passed on to FI.
    What might be the problem with Er PF Wage Types /3F3 & /3F4?
    We have not posted June salary till now due to above said posting error.  Now July Payroll is also started.
    Experts, please help me to sort out the issue.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Hema

    Hi,
    Thanks for quick reply.
    The error is "Posting balance not cleared".
    We have changed all the components including basic salary.  Payroll program has taken PF Basis correctly and calculated PF amounts, both for Employee & Employer contribution correctly for individual months.
    As I mentioned for all the three months Employee Contribution is considered for FI posting through regular wage type for current month and through /ZF5 for last two months.
    But for Employer Contribution only June amount is considered for posting even though the correct amounts are shown for other two months in RT (three lines for /3F3 & /3F4 each).
    Due to this, total amount for Balance Sheet Accounts is less where as Expense Accounts is shown higher as Employer Contribution is not considered for April & May, causing imbalance in Accounting entries.
    GL Accounts are mapped correctly.  Otherwise even the current month amount will not be carried to FI.
    Hope my explanation is clear.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Hema

  • No /559 wage type in posting run - Program RPCIPE00

    hello everyone,
    I have created a posting run for an employee via report RPCIPE00.
    the scenario is employee was not paid in period 26/2007 (26 in 26), he got paid in 26 in 27 ( period 27/2007) but there was no payment  for 27 itself only the inflow from 26 was paid.
    system should post the amount in  bank transfer wage type /559 but there is no /559 wage type in the posting run created.
    the same scenario was working in past so may be some customizing setting has changed somewhere..
    any inputs from you people will be highly appreciated.
    thanks.

    Just normal employee, As I said in display log mod when running Posting, I can see wt /559 in current period, but checking posting document, there is no wt /559 inside.
    Have you faced it before? It's total standard process by running standard T-code for posting to FI.
    Actually it's special ee, this current month ee is withdraw from 1st date, i guess it's reason SAP didn't generate current month in posting document (only fro retro active period), but not sure. And very strange why can see in display log mode, but cannot see in document, should be same. Anw I raised OSS message to SAP about it, maybe it's hidden issue of SAP
    Regards,
    Woody.

  • UK Payroll Issue :Gross Wage Type /101 missing from RT

    Hi,
    We are facing an issue for some of the employees wherein Gross wage
    type /101 is not being generated when payroll is run .In place of /101 , /A01 wage type
    is getting created.
    This issue is being faced by employees whose claims were entered in
    March ( Payroll Period 12 2008) to be paid in April ( Payroll Period 01
    2009)
    If anybody knows ,please let me know why its happening like that .
    Thanks in advance.
    Anupama

    Hi Surya,
    Folowing is the log for employee not getting claims.
    /101 Total gross                                                       633.52
    /105 Working net                                                       475.08
    /111 EE's Pensio                                                       633.52
    /121 Taxable pay                                                       617.38
    /124 Pre-tax ded                                                        35.94-
    /131 NIable pay                                                        633.52
    /132 Regular NIa                                                       633.52
    /141 Arrestable                                                        493.78
    /211 Salary relv                                                       633.52
    /212 Salary relv                                                       653.32
    /302 Employer NI                                                        25.64
    /501 Tax paid                                                          123.60
    /550 Statutory n                                                       475.08
    /552 Retro. net                                                         18.70
    /559 Bank transf              01                                       493.80
    /560 Amount paid                                                       493.80
    /5A4 Sal.AWE bas                                                        19.80
    /5C2 Retro arstb                                                        18.70
    /5T2 Retro.taxbl                                                        18.70
    /5T4 Retro.preta                                                         1.10-
    /700 WT plus ER                                                        659.16
    /840 Diff.curr.f01                                   1.77
    /851 Total hours                                   103.18
    /P20 Tax-free pe                                                        34.84
    /V03 Net Pay fro                  V 03                                   0.02
    /V41 ME: arrest.                                                         0.02
    /VNS ME: NI paid                             25.64   2.00              653.34
    /VT3 ME:Taxable                                                          0.02
    /VT4 ME:Tax Paid
    9001 Local Gover                                                        34.84
    9101 Local Gover          0002    O 02                                 126.07
    9201 LG Tax Free                                                        34.84
    9N39 Cost dist.o          0002                                          25.64
    9NZ3 Cost dist o          0002    O 02                                  25.64
    9P01 Cost dist.o                                                       126.07
    3 /001 Main Hourly01                       62,173.06
    3 /002 WTD under 501                       71,026.95
    3 /003 WTD over 5y01                       72,617.95
    3 /004 Schools Spe01                       71,250.13
    3 /005 Valuation b01                            6.25
    3 /010 Daily Rate 01                       204361.29
    3 /011 Daily Rate 01                       204361.29
    3 /012 Daily Rate 01                       204361.29
    3 /013 Daily Rate 01                       204361.29
    3 /250 Salary summ                                                       633.52
    3 /251 Basic Annua01                                                   7,602.24
    3 /252 Total Annua01                                                   7,602.24
    3 1000 Basic Pay (01                                                     633.52
    Following is the log for employee getting claims
    /105 Working net                                                     2,761.26
    /111 EE's Pensio                                                     3,166.86
    /121 Taxable pay                                                     2,028.22
    /131 NIable pay                                                      3,166.86
    /133 Irregular N                                                     3,166.86
    /141 Arrestable                                                      1,622.62
    /211 Salary relv                                                     3,166.86
    /212 Salary relv                                                     2,028.22
    /501 Tax paid                                                          405.60
    /550 Statutory n                                                     2,761.26
    /551 Stat.net re                                                     3,166.86-
    /552 Retro. net                                                      2,028.22
    /553 Recalc.diff                                                     3,166.86-
    /5A1 Sal.AWE bas                                     1.00
    /5A3 Sal.AWE bas                                                     3,166.86-
    /5A4 Sal.AWE bas                                                     2,028.22
    /5C1 Arstble ern                                                     3,166.86-
    /5C2 Retro arstb                                                     2,028.22
    /5T1 Txbl.pay re                                                     3,166.86-
    /5T2 Retro.taxbl                                                     2,028.22
    /700 WT plus ER                                                      3,166.86
    /840 Diff.curr.f01                                   2.80
    /851 Total hours                                   162.80
    /A01 Total gross                                                     3,166.86
    /V01 Net Pay on                                                      1,622.62
    3 /001 Main Hourly01                       190940.93
    3 /002 WTD under 501                       218132.27
    3 /001 Main Hourly01                       190940.93
    3 /002 WTD under 501                       218132.27
    3 /003 WTD over 5y01                       223018.42
    3 /004 Schools Spe01                       218817.70
    3 /005 Valuation b01                           19.19
    3 /010 Daily Rate 01                       990267.74
    3 /011 Daily Rate 01                       990267.74
    3 /012 Daily Rate 01                       990267.74
    3 /013 Daily Rate 01                       990267.74
    3 /250 Salary summ                                                     3,069.83
    3 /251 Basic Annua01                                                  36,837.96
    3 /252 Total Annua01                                                  36,837.96
    3 1270 Notional Ba01                                                   3,069.83
    3 3715 Claim WTD >01                       223018.42 142.00            3,166.86
    I have also got this info.
    Retroaction and End of Year 
    Purpose
    If you need to use retroaction over end of year, for example when overtime entered in period 12 is to be paid in period 1, or backdated pay increases applied in the new tax year are to start in the previous tax year, you can do this without this changing any statutory balances in the previous tax year.
    Process Flow
    If you make any changes over end of year that trigger retroaction, this will not affect the statutory balances in the previous tax year.
    However, a change that affects total gross, for example, will be recorded and summed into a wage type called /A01 (Total Gross). The /A01 value will feed a wage type called /Z01 (Total Gross), which will be passed across to the new tax year, ensuring that any retro differences will only affect statutory cumulatives in the new tax year, but will not compromise period 12 statutory cumulatives that may already have been used for end of year reporting.
    The following wage types were introduced to enable retroaction over end of year:
    u2022     /A01
    u2022     /A12
    u2022     /AMP
    u2022     /AP0
    u2022     /AP1
    u2022     /ASP
    u2022     /Z01
    u2022     /Z12
    u2022     /ZMP
    u2022     /ZP0
    u2022     /ZP1
    u2022     /ZSP
    Thanks and Regards,
    Anupama

  • Payslip display issue for retro periods of a wage type

    Hi,
    we have an issue with payslip display for the rate field of an wage type.
    we are genaearting the amount of a wage type 2000 using T511K constant. and we have changed the Rate of this constant in the mid of pay period.
    if we have split in WPBP then we are getting payslip display for old and new rate. which is fine.
    however if we don't have WPBP split for retro periods then payslip is clubbing the old and new rates hence the diaplay is wrong.
    ex: wrong dispaly for retro periods (08/2009 one record with RTE as 6 and for 09,2009 another record with RTE as 6)
    wage type          rate             number      amonut
    2000                   12                2                12      (rate should be 6 however it is diaplaying 12 as taking rate of 08 & 09,2009         periods where it is comg as 6+6=12 which is wrong)
    right dispaly should be
    wage type          rate             number      amonut
    2000                    6                   2                12      (rate should be 6, i.e 6*2=12)
    Thanks
    Gayathri

    Hi Gayatri,
    First check the values in payroll log or RT table. If its displaying correctly in RT table and if its problem with Payslip, then ask the abaper to debug the program.
    Also check the WPBP table in RT table, because as you told that if there are any changes in the mid of the month, then the amount may split.
    And if you have written any PCR for this, then check the PCR, whether its overwriting with any values.
    Just check the above points.
    Thanks & Regards
    Bharathi

  • Time enry collisions and wage type issues

    Hi Experts,
    We do not have holiday's embedded in our schedules due to the flexibility in when employees are allowed to take the paid time off and also due to
    our "flex" work schedules being more than 8 hour work days but the holiday benefit is an 8 hour benefit.  This has caused us a lot of issues with
    time entry, however, we thought it had been corrected.  We are now running into the same issues.  Here is an example:
    First Issue:
    Work Schedule week of 12/31/07 - 01/05/08
                Sun   Mon   Tues  Wed   Thur  Fri   Sat
    Schedule    0     10    10    10    10    0     0
    Tuesday the 1st is a holiday and the employee must enter Absence type 240 for 10 hours to fit his schedule.  Employee also work on the holiday and
    needs to enter Attendance type 832 for unscheduled holiday work.  When we try to enter the attendance we receive a full day collision error and
    cannot continue.
    Second Issue:
    Work Schedule week of 12/31/07 - 01/05/08
                Sun   Mon   Tues  Wed   Thur  Fri   Sat
    Schedule    0     8     8     8     8     8     0
    Tuesday is the holiday and the employee enters Absence type 240 for 8 hours to fit her schedule.  She is also on Standy-By time for the holiday.  We
    had to configure standby time specifically as a wage type and activate the wage type column in the CATS entry screen.  She must enter W/T (it's the
    only option) 1802 and then record 24 hours in the date 01/01/08.  This entry also gives us a full day collision message and we cannot continue.
    We can provide more examples when a consultant is assigned.  These options used to work and we do not know why they are no longer working.
    Advice me to resolve this ticket on time, its high priority ticket.

    Hi,
    I think your 1st problem comes from the misunderstanding of SAP work schedule logic.
    As you mentioned, you want to input ab type 240 to fit work schedule. But it's not necessary.
    For that day is a WORK day with holiday class 1. That means scheduled work can be overwrited by holiday. If the employee does not come to work in that day without any 2001 informations, he/she is NOT absence,because that day is a paid time off.
    And as for the attendance type, it's also no needed. Because if employee came to work in a public holiday, the working hours will automatically counted as OT hours but UNAPPORVED! To approve this OT, you need input 2007 attendance quota. In this example, the employee got 10 hours OT in puplic holiday which is recorded by SAP TM but unapporved. Then you should create a 2007 record with 10 hours attendance quota in the same day. By doing this, the TM evaluation will count those 10 hours as paid OT.
    I think the way above is what you called "flexibility in when employees are allowed to take the paid time off "
    Hope helpful
    Br,Kee

  • Urgent: Posting to different Symbolic Accounts for the same Wage Type

    Hi Everyone,
    Assuming that I have a Wage Type and 2 sets of Symbolic Accounts tied to their respective Chart of Accounts (belong to 2 different companies).
    When I go to the configuration node "Define posting characteristics of wage types" in SPRO, under Payroll, I have assigned Symbolic Account 1234 (which belongs to Chart of Accounts A) and Symbolic Account 6789 (which belongs to Chart of Account B) to Wage Type 1000.
    When I execute the Transaction for Posting to Accounting (PC00_M99_CIPE), I get an error (Message: Posting Balance is not cleared). After exploring the log, i notice that both Symbolic Accounts appeared.
    How do i ensure that only the specific Symbolic Account is being posted?
    Take for example that the employee belongs to Company A.

    Hi,
    U can post to different accounts for same wage type but NOT symbolic accounts!
    Do as follows:
    1)-Define employee grouping account determination(PPOMD feature)
    2)-Define symbolic accounts
    3)-Assigning Accounts
    When doing 3rd step, click "RULE" button and select "Employee group".
    By doing so you can posting same WT to different Accounts according to different employee grouping , like below:
    SymAcc   Grp             Account
    Z001     GU     5502019900
    Z001     SZ     5502019901
    Z001     YY     5502019902

  • Posting Charateristics of Wage-Types

    Hello experts,
    I cannot see all wage-types in V_T52EZ (IMG node - define posting characteristics of wage types). When I try to copy and create the posting characteristics of these missing wage-types in the node, it throws error "......not defined in T52EZ".
    Can someone help me out of it?
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards
    Peeyoosh

    Hi,
    Try copying a model wage type in PU30 or OH11 and set proper characteristics in T511.
    Then you can use your custom wage type for your FI posting.
    Reward points appreciated,
    Thank You,

  • Posting wage types - symbolic accounts

    Hi,
    I have 3 types of wage types
    1. Payments (+ve)
    2. Deductions (-ve)
    3. Adjustment (+ve & -ve)
    now I have created the symbolic accounts for Payment wage types ex: 1010 Food Allowance (P010) and for 2010 Food Allowance Adjst. (A010) now I have a question whether i should create another symbolic account for Adjustment i.e. A010 or otherwise i can use the same account P010.
    Thank you

    Hello!
    Yes.  I want a set of Wage Types on Infotype 0014 (Recurring Payments/Deductions) to be available for employees assigned to a couple of specific Company Codes.  These Wage Types in turn should not post to any other Company Codes other than the specific two Company Codes.
    I do hope that clarifies my question.
    Cheers!
    Ninja

  • Infotype 0008 Wage type Issue(Urgent)

    Hi all,
    An hiring action was run for a new employee and subsequent information was input in PA30.Along with other information wage-type was filled in Infotype 0008.
    Problem: When we check the corresponding transparent table PA0008 we are unable to find wage type or amount entry there. But when we retrieve the same in PA30 we get all the information along with wage-type and amount.
    Can someone please tell as to where the data is getting retrieved from if it is not saved in PA0008.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Ribhu

    Hi ALL
    Thanks for your response.
    but the problem isn't solved. The client says that this WT is not a proportionate value instead amount   should be payed for the hours the employees works.
    In table T510 i find the amount as 2.00 DKK which appears in the infotype 0008 amount field.
    Kindly advice

  • Infotype 0008 wage-type issue.

    Hi all,
    An hiring action was run for a new employee and subsequent information was input in PA30.Along with other information wage-type was filled in Infotype 0008.
    Problem: When we check the corresponding transparent table PA0008 we are unable to find wage type or amount entry there. But when we retrieve the same in PA30 we get all the information along with wage-type and amount.
    Can someone please tell as to where the data is getting retrieved from if it is not saved in PA0008.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Ribhu

    Hi Ribhu,
    You have to retrieve data through the Reports only because data of IT8 is stored in the infotype only and we cannot check the data from the database table .
    It is suggested to get the Report or use standard report.
    Manoj Shakya.
    Technical-Fuctional Consultant
    SAP-HR
    ******(Useful answers should be rewarded)

Maybe you are looking for

  • Data missing while running a crystal report from SAP B1 2007A

    Dear All, I am facing an issue that is if i run a report from SAP B1 using Crystal reports AddOn, it misses out some data. Few Initial pages and a last page appears in the report. But when i run the same report using Crystal reports Designer it shows

  • Creating XML Publisher report without xml data source

    Hi Anyone developed XML publisher without xml source.I wanted to know is there any way to develop that.. Presently we need a .xml file to develop any report on XML Publisher.But if there will be a way where is no .xml file and we need to generate tag

  • CR Viewer Control Crashes Application

    Hi, I'm using VS2005 The CR that came with VS 2005 and CRSP1 Windows Forms application Crystal Viewer control dropped on a form My application behaves correctly on my development computer, but on a target machine the entire application crashes when t

  • Oracle apps r12 data is not coming up in form based on org_id specific view

    Hi All, I am new to oracle apps R12. I have to develop a form which is based on views which are org_id specific. My data block is based on view which is org_id specific. Can anyone tell me what all settings i need to do in my form so that i can get t

  • Bank Details Infotype 9

    Is it possible to limit (i.e. set a maximum) number of direct deposit banks for employees?  For instance, we would like to limit the number of banks employees can send direct deposits to at 3 per employee.  Thanks!