Issue in scheduling transaction MEMASSPO.

My task is to set the delivery complete indicator in the purchase order line items.
I can save a variant for the transaction, but how to select the fields in the variant.
Do you have any idea.
Thanks,
Seshadri

Thanks,for the info.
I have done as you suggested,but when I do the background scheduling,how to pass the field values.
for example : delivery completed = X.
system does not ask me anywhere during creation of the JOB or during saving of the variant.
During on line execution,where system will ask for the changing of field values.
Can you please help me in understanding.
Thanks,
Seshadri

Similar Messages

List of Issues in Scheduling agreement ??

Hii experts
Cam somebody explain me about the crictical issue in scheduling agreements in MM .
What kind of issues will occur in SAP SA scenario.
Can somebody share their exp on this ...
Thanks

Please check the SA issues in these links:
Scheduling Agreement
Scheduling Agreement
scheduling agreement
Scheduling Agreement

Scheduling transaction VCC1

Hi all,
I want to schedule transaction VCC1 to run daily in background. The normal flow has the following steps in it.
1. AFter selection screen, the report executes and generates a list of sales documents with pending authorization with checkboxes for each.
2. I need to select all check boxes on screen.
3. Click forward for authorization button on toolbar. This will grey out all documents and checkboxes.
4. Press SAVE button on standard toolbar.
5. Finally report generates an ALV list which i need to send to spool.
If I automate this process by BDC, the problem is the report selection screen - as I do not have any fixed values that i can record my BDC with, that is, values for variants and variant may keep changing. This can be a problem as user can enter patterns like >=, < or exclude or any combination in selection criteria.
Secondly - If I schedule this report directly in background the report seems to stop after display a list with checkboxes - so now how do i trigger user events like selecting all checkboxes, pressing save button, etc. I tried in SM36 by defining multiple steps and multiple reports using set user command <funciton code>, but unsuccessful. I think it can be possible to trigger events of one program from other abap program ??
Kinldy guide me

Hi Srinivas,
I found a problem. The program RV21A010 is desinged just for authorization of orders. If I want deliveries, I specify a delivery document then it does call delivery function module but considers it to be an order document.
Also the function it calls is just 1, while VCC1 goes through more systematic process by calling many. Only the last function in both the programs is same.
It is my understanding the RV21A010 with regards to deliveries, is used to process the order to get the next Authorization for subsequent shipments (but not necessarily the actual delivery documents themselves)-even SAP documentation might be wrong in this case - some translation error.
Again, what we need the VCC1 custom work for is to process Delivery Documents that have insufficient authorization based on the product that was selected to get shipped for the order and the fact that someone chose to ship more than SAP expected and authorized the CC for.
Any inputs will be appreciated - because If I need to use your suggestion then I need to proove that the results from VCC1 and RV21A0101 for deliveries are same.

2 issues with call transaction to LS24

Hello All,
There are 2 issues with call transaction to LS24.
1) It doesn't take batch value and displays stock for all batches.
2) When you go back, it doesn't go back to the calling program.
Any thoughts ?
Here is my code:
PARAMETERS: p_lgnum TYPE lgnum,
 p_matnr TYPE matnr,
 p_werks TYPE werks_d,
 p_lgort TYPE lgort_d,
 p_charg TYPE charg_d.
START-OF-SELECTION.
END-OF-SELECTION.
PERFORM display_stock_per_batch.
*& Form DISPLAY_STOCK_PER_BATCH
FORM display_stock_per_batch .
SET PARAMETER ID 'LGN' FIELD p_lgnum.
SET PARAMETER ID 'MAT' FIELD p_matnr.
SET PARAMETER ID 'WRK' FIELD p_werks.
SET PARAMETER ID 'LAG' FIELD p_lgort.
SET PARAMETER ID 'CHA' FIELD p_charg.
CALL TRANSACTION 'LS24' AND SKIP FIRST SCREEN.
ENDFORM. " DISPLAY_STOCK_PER_BATCH

hello
use this code
perform bdc_dynpro using 'SAPML01S' '0209'.
perform bdc_field using 'BDC_CURSOR'
 'RL01S-CHARG'.
perform bdc_field using 'BDC_OKCODE'
 '/00'.
perform bdc_field using 'RL01S-LGNUM'
 p_lgnum.
perform bdc_field using 'RL01S-MATNR'
 p_matnr.
perform bdc_field using 'RL01S-WERKS'
 p_werks.
perform bdc_field using 'RL01S-LGORT'
 p_lgort.
perform bdc_field using 'RL01S-BESTQ'
perform bdc_field using 'RL01S-SOBKZ'
perform bdc_field using 'RL01S-CHARG'
 p_charg.
perform bdc_dynpro using 'SAPML01S' '0209'.
perform bdc_field using 'BDC_OKCODE'
 '/EBACK'.
perform bdc_field using 'BDC_CURSOR'
 'RL01S-LGNUM'.
perform bdc_transaction using 'LS24'.
may be it will help u

Custom Attributes for Scheduled Transactions (Background Jobs)

Hi,
I am trying to fetch the custom attributes for scheduled background jobs. Since we are not using the XAcute Queries to run the automatic jobs, we can't use the AUTOBIND property for custom attributes and hence can't fetch them in the scheduled transactions. Is there any way to retrieve the attributes while scheduling a transaction ?
Thanks,
Amit Rath

Hi Amit,
a way that works: inside your transaction you can call a XML query that reads out the property list for a given user. In the URL of the XML query you can add the user by using the IllumLoginName parameter.
- create a XML query with the following URL:
http://<server>:<port>/XMII/PropertyAccessServlet?mode=list&Content-Type=text/xml&IllumLoginName=<User>&IllumLoginPassword=<Password>
- in your transaction, call the query. You can retrieve the value of the attribute with a XPath expression like this:
XML_propertyAccessServlet_0.Results{/Rowsets/Rowset/Row[Name='MyAttribute']/Value}
Interestingly, adding a User / Password in the Scheduler Editor of the job does not work (MII 12.0.2). Maybe this would be also an option for you to try.
Michael
Edited by: Michael Otto on Nov 9, 2010 8:27 AM

Error while posting XML from a scheduled transaction to another transaction

When I try posting an XML from one transaction to another in a different project by calling it as a webservice, it doen't hit the other transaction.
I see this in the Netweaver error logs:
java.util.zip.ZipException: error in opening zip file
at java.util.zip.ZipFile.open(Native Method)
at java.util.zip.ZipFile.<init>(ZipFile.java:111)
at java.util.zip.ZipFile.<init>(ZipFile.java:127) [see details]
XML AssignXml Parse Error
[EXCEPTION]
org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Premature end of file.... [see details]
AND
[Fatal Error] :-1:-1: Premature end of file.
More interestingly it happens ONLY when I schedule the parent transaction, when I trigger it manual everything works fine.
Any help appreciated.

Hi Srinivas,
I see that this post was marked as answered. Could you please elaborate on how this problem was fixed?
I am experiencing a similar issue:
I am trying to get the Active Portal application running in MII 12.1.7 (also 12.1.8) and all went well up to the point where the ActivePortalMonitor transaction is scheduled. In the logs I also receive the org.xml.sax.SAXParseException.
The culprit is the XMLQuery block in that txn. Just like with your situation, when ran from workbench it works; when scheduled it doesn't.
I tried replacing the XMLQuery with other blocks that get the same result, i.e. XMLLoader or HTTPLoader + StringToXMLParser; and in all cases the XML fetching element bombs out.
I also built a simple txn that does an XMLQuery on another txn and then dumps the output in a file. Same thing: when run from workbench it runs fine; from scheduler it gives "SAX" error
I would post the specific error log, but it is always varying, here is one example:
[ERROR] [Untitled_0]org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Open quote is expected for attribute "DIR" associated with an element type "HTML".
Any help/hints are much appreciated
Kind Regards,
Fanie

Issue in Material Transaction in WIP

Gratings to Guru's...
I trying to do Material issue for Discrete job components in WIP. but facing an error in MTL_TRANSACTIONS_INTERFACE. below are the error details.
Error Msg : ‘Requirement is this job/schedule's primary assembly’
Error Code : inventory_item_id.
I am using below insert statement.(able to do material transaction through front end also Similar kind of data for other organization is working fine).
insert into mtl_transactions_interface
( source_code,
source_line_id,
source_header_id,
process_flag,
validation_required,
transaction_mode,
lock_flag,
last_update_date,
last_updated_by,
creation_date,
created_by,
inventory_item_id,
organization_id,
transaction_quantity,
primary_quantity,
transaction_uom,
transaction_date,
subinventory_code,
locator_id,
transaction_source_id,
transaction_source_type_id,
transaction_action_id,
transaction_type_id,
transaction_reference,
wip_entity_type,
operation_seq_num,
bom_revision_date,
routing_revision_date,
scheduled_flag,
final_completion_flag,
Flow_schedule,
--revision,
transaction_interface_id
values (
1, --source code
1, -- source line id
-1, -- source header id
1, -- process flag
1, -- validation required
3, -- transaction mode
2, -- lock flag
sysdate, -- last update date
-1, -- last updated by
sysdate, -- creation date
-1, -- created by
62481, -- inventory item id --*
414, -- org id*
-30, -- transaction quantity
-30, -- primary quantity
'EA', -- transaction uom *
sysdate, -- transaction date
'UKDIE', -- subinventory code*
47473, --locator_id *
4368857, -- transaction source id *
5, -- transaction source type id
31, -- transaction action id
35, -- transaction type id
'test', -- transaction reference
1, -- wip entity type
10, -- operation seq num
sysdate, -- bom revision date
sysdate, -- routing revision date
2, -- scheduled flag
'N', --final_completion_flag
'N', -- flow schedule
--'0' , -- Revision
15375520 --interface_id *
delete from mtl_transaction_lots_interface
where TRANSACTION_INTERFACE_ID = 15375519
/*2. Data inserting into mtl_transaction_lots_interface */
insert into mtl_transaction_lots_interface
(TRANSACTION_INTERFACE_ID,
SOURCE_CODE,
SOURCE_LINE_ID,
LAST_UPDATE_DATE,
LAST_UPDATED_BY,
CREATION_DATE,
CREATED_BY,
LOT_NUMBER,
TRANSACTION_QUANTITY,
ERROR_CODE,
PROCESS_FLAG)
values(
15375520,--interface_id, *
1, -- Source Code
1, -- Source Line id
sysdate, -- Last update date
-1, -- Last updated by
sysdate, -- Creation Date
-1, -- Created By
'PID0190454', -- Lot number Needs input *
-30, -- Transaction Quantity
NULL,
1 -- Process Flag
Please help me ....
Thanks in advance
Balaji

It seems that 62481 may be the inventory_item_id of the assembly. Make sure you use the inventory_item_id of the component when inserting into mtl_transactions_interface.
Sandeep Gandhi

ISSUE REGARDING ME21N TRANSACTION.

HI,
IN ME21N TRANSACTON, FOR ONE PO NUMBER THERE WILL BE MULTIPLE ITEMS. MY ISSUE IS THOSE MULTIPLE ITEMS WE ENTER SHOULD BE OF THE SAME PLANT. THAT IS, IN FIRST LINE ITEM ,IF WE ENTER PLANT AS 400,THEN FROM THE NEXT LINE ITEM IT SHOULD ALLOW ALL OTHER ROWS RELATED TO THAT 400 ONLY. IF ANY PLANT IS ENTERED OTHER THAN 400 IN SUBSEQUENT ROWS ,THEN IT SHOULD DISPLAY THE ERROR MESSAGE THAT "ONLY 400 PLANT IS ALLOWED BUT NOT OTHERS."
PLZ LET ME KNOW THE RELAVANT USER-EXIT AND THE CODE TO DO THIS .
POINTS WILL BE AWARDED. THIS IS URGENT REQUIRMENT.
PLZ LET ME KNOW AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
THANKING U IN ADVANCE,
A.SRINIVAS.

Hi,
capslock unlocked:
In me21n transacton, for one po number there will be multiple items. My issue is those multiple items we enter should be of the same plant. That is, in first line item ,if we enter plant as 400,then from the next line item it should allow all other rows related to that 400 only. If any plant is entered other than 400 in subsequent rows ,then it should display the error message that "only 400 plant is allowed but not others."
Plz let me know the relavant user-exit and the code to do this .
Points will be awarded. This is urgent requirment.
Plz let me know as soon as possible.
Thanking u in advance,
A.srinivas.
Look you here:
In this step, you develop enhancements for Purchasing.
The following SAP enhancements are available for the Purchasing area:
AMPL0001
User subscreen for additional AMPL data (Manufacturer part number)
LMELA002
Adoption of batch number from shipping notification at time of posting of a goods receipt
LMELA010
Incoming shipping notification: adoption of item data from IDoc
LMEQR001
User exit for source determination
M06B0001
Role determination for release of requisitions
M06B0001
Changes to communication structure for release of requisitions
M06B0003
Number range and document number
M06B0004
Number range and document number
M06B0005
Changes to communication structure for overall release of purchase requisitions
M06E0004
Changes to communication structure for release of purchasing document
M06E0005
Role determination for release of purchasing documents
ME590001
Grouping of requisitions for PO split in transaction ME59
MEETA001
Determination of schedule line type (backlog, immediate requirement, forecast)
MEFLD004
Determination of earliest delivery date for checking at time of goods receipt (PO only)
MELAB001
Generation of forecast delivery schedule: realization via creation profile
MEQUERY1
Enhancement for document overview ME21N / ME51N
MEVME001
Calculation of default GR quantity and over/underdelivery tolerances
MM06E001
User exits for inbound EDI messages and outbound purchasing documents
MM06E003
Number range and document number
MM06E004
Control of import data screens in purchase orders
MM06E005
Customer fields in purchasing documents
MEREQ001
Customer's own data in purhcase requisitions
MM06E007
Change document for requisitions when converting into POs
MM06E008
Monitoring of contract target value in case of release orders
MM06E009
Relevant texts for "Texts exist" indicator
MM06E010
Field selection for vendor address
MM06E011
Activation of requisition block
MM06L001
Exits for determination of ratings in vendor evaluation
MMAL0001
ALE source list distribution: outbound processing
MMAL0002
ALE source list distribution: inbound processing
MMAL0003
ALE purchasing info record distribution: outbound processing
MMAL0004
ALE purchasing info record distribution: inbound processing
MMDA0001
Default values for delivery addresses
MMFAB001
User exit for generation of releases
MRFLB001
Control items during release creation
LWBON001
Enhancement of LIS update through extension of the communication structure MCKONA (business volumes and rebate income)
LWBON003
Change settlement data for end-of-period rebate settlement before creation of settlement documents
LWSUS001
Customer-specific source determination in Retail
Regards,
Clemens

Authorization issue on SHD0 transaction variant in R/3

Hi,
Can anyone help me on the below issue?
Created a transaction variant ZME31K using SHD0 on R/3 system with the base transaction ME31K.
And created a transaction ZME31K for the above transaction variant.
Created one ID which has access only to transaction ZME31K.
But when tried to create contract using ZME31K, it allows to create the contract, but ended up with message "You are not authorized to use ME31K".
Anyone faced similar issue before? how this can be resolved? As per the busniess requirement, they can provide access only to the transaction variant for the user and they will not be assigned to ME31K.
-Thanks,

> We are doing an Upgrade assessment wherein at R/3 side, the system is being upgraded from 4.6 to ECC 6.0.
> I wanted to know the impact the Change in Transactions at R/3 side.. namely transactions..
> AS02, CT02, F-02, F-41, F-49, FB01 would have on BW.
What do you mean? I don't get your question. What impact should those transaction have on BI?
Markus

Issue of Schedule Lines in MRP List

Hi,
We ran MRP for one material, we observed MRP generated 3 schedules lines with respect to single Schedule Agreement with exception message as 30(Plan Process according to schedule).
Schedule line 1 --- Delivery Date is 10/06/2011 in MD05, Delivery date in Schedule Agreement is 10/04/2011,Rescheduling date is 08/27/2011 Exception message is 30(Plan Process according to schedule(08/27/2011 08/25/2011).
Schedule line 2 --- Delivery Date is 10/06/2011 in MD05, Delivery date in Schedule Agreement is 10/04/2011,Rescheduling date is 10/05/2011 Exception message is 30(Plan Process according to schedule(10/05/2011 10/03/2011).
Schedule line 3 --- Delivery Date is 10/06/2011 in MD05, Delivery date in Schedule Agreement is 10/04/2011,Rescheduling date is 09/08/2011 Exception message is 30(Plan Process according to schedule(09/08/2011 09/06/2011).
But in Schedule Agreement, we are seeing that all the 3 delivery schedules with delivery dates as "10/04/2011" as GR Processing time is 2 days.
Can anyone tell why the MRP has not updated the Schedule Agreement with the new Delivery dates proposed by the exception message 30 in MD05 list.
Thanks in advance.

Hi Vivek,
I am not knowing how to upload the details.
Please find the Material master details for the issue material:-
MRP type- PD, Lot Size - ZE - Period lot size, Sched.2, Split ( Config Setting of this lot size key is provided below),
Minimum lot size-2,000.000, rounding profile-2,000.000, Material type- ROH,Safety Stock - 1224, Pld Delivery time -63 days, GR Processing time- 2 days, Planning Calendar-ZEX.,Consumption mode     2,Bwd consumption per. 999,Fwd consumption per. 999 ,Mixed MRP --      1, Strategy group =      Z1 ( Final assembly & assembly level, i.e., combination of 40 + 70))
Config Setting of Lot size key- ZE are :-
LotSizeProced. P Period lot-sizing procedure ,Lot-size ind.-   K Period lot size as in PPC planning calendar
Scheduling --    2 Period end := delivery date ,No. of periods 1, Splitting Quota - Checked ,Last Lot Exact- Checked.
b) Scheduling Agreement has 3 delivery schedule lines with Delivery Date as "10/04/2011" and scheduled quantities as 2000,1617 and 2000 EA.
As per the MD05 screen,for this material, corresponding to these 3 schedules lines, we have exception message -30 with different delivery dates. Our Question is why MRP does not updated the Delivery dates for the schedule lines in the scheduled agreement proposed by these exception message.
Can you please let me know whether this information is sufficient for you to understand my problem?.
Thanks in advance.

BI Publisher: Issue while scheduling the report/query to be executed daily

Hi,
We are using Oracle Business Intelligence 11.1.1.6.3 and while we schedule a report(RTF Template) we are facing issue.We use bursting query and when we select option to execute immediately it runs fine and sends notifications,it also executes when we schedule it to run Once but fails when i schedule the report to be executed DAILY .

hii
The query does not includes any RKF, CKF any complex calculations. as I said before also query is based on MP which is designed on a single Cube. There are no such navigational Attributes used for selection, Number of records are not more than 300 on that particular selection parameter
there is only one info object which is creating issue & it is a master info object. If i am restricting this info object in the query & then executes the query , it gives the error msg also i put a variable for input parameter, & there I restrict the value, then also query executes with an error msg
But if query is not restricted with any value for that info object then query executes with in a second.
Thanks
neha

Issue in MD04 transaction with exception message 26

Dear All,
I am facing 2 issues:
1) Even if the sales order line is confirmed and fulfilled, we are getting the stock for that material against the same sales order in the MMBE Transaction.
2) For the above material present in those sales Order which are confirmed and fulfilled, We are getting the entries for that material in Transaction MD04 ( Stock requirement list of the material after we run the MRP for a particular materia) with the exception message 26.
From our end, we have used the report sdrqcr21 which delete the wrong entries from "VBBE" so that MD04 will show incorrect entries but this approach is not helping us in the above situation.
Regards,
Rakesh

Rakesh,
This is one issue. There is nothing wrong with the software, this is standard behavior. You have built or procured more stock than was required by the sales order. The remaining unnecessary stock is now sitting in inventory, and is displayed in MD04 under the Sales order segment. This stock can never be used again within SAP, unless someone re-opens the sales order or performs some transaction to remove the stock from being 'Sales order on hand' stock.
Some companies will scrap this material, using their standard scrapping policies. Others will transfer this un-usable E stock to general stock, if it can actually be reused.
Rgds,
DB49

Issue inMaintenace scheduling issue in Two plants with similar data set up

Hi PM Gurus
Scenario: A) We Have two maintenance Plants which have got Factory calendar assignment as per Table Data. We need to change Non Working days of factory Calenders (D1 and T2) for work centres working and do Maintenace scheduling
Issue    A) Plant PL0B has got factory Calender T2 set up at work centre (WCT2) .We get Maintenace schedule Calls as per Calender set up ie No Maintenace Call (Planned call and Call date) on (Non Working Days). Here we change public holidays to working days and this throw schedule calls accordingly (thatu2019s Maintence Calls on working days only).
B)     We have similar requirement to change public holidays for Calender D1 which is assigned to Work centre WCD1, then we must get maintenance calls for working days. But we find that for Plant PL0A, Maintenace Calls are generating even on non working days. Only difference between Plant PL0A and PL0B is for Work centre set up as per screen shots for Capacity data.
C)     We have changed work centre data of WCD1 as per WCT2 ,but still PL0A is giving maintenance Calls on Non Working days (Not Controlled by Calender data of Work Centre )
D)     Info: Scheduling indicator in Maintenace plans of both plants is TIME
Plant      Factory Calender (plant      Factory Calender
(Work Centre)     Non Working Days                                                      Work Centre (PL0A)
PL0A      U1     D1     3-Public holidays                                                WCD1
PL0B     T1      T2     Sat ,Sun and 10 Public holidays                                WCT2
Thanks
Upinder

Greetings Upinder,
You should set the Scheduling indicator to "Time - factory calendar" and select a Factory Calendar if you want the Maintenance plan to be scheduled according to one of the calendars you set up.
The work centre capacity scheduling doesn't come into place here, yet - it'll allow for rescheduling once the orders are called.

Issue with Scheduling agreements created with reference to Contract

We create scheduling agreements only with reference to contracts. A contract may have multiple Scheduling agreements linked to it. Now the problem is that when a scheduling agreement is being modified, it is creating a lock to all the other scheduling agreements which refers to the same contract. So till the time the user is out of change mode in Scheduling agreement, no other user is able to perform any transactions pertaining to other scheduling agreements (referring to the same Contract)
Is there anyway that we can address this?? Please suggest.

The record locks are needed to avoid data inconsistencies. If 2 users would be able to have the same document open in update mode, then how can you decide which entry will be used for a table update? And what would you tell the other person? (Oh sorry, another user was quicker, please start all over again)
In some high frequent transactions SAP has developed some options like late locks for good movements, but more often you have to take organization measures like educating the users, and maybe reducing the number of items in a document and creating more documents instead.
If it is a real big headache then you have to talk to SAP, have to explain the situation, and hope that they either have already a solution or even realize that it is not needed to lock all and can create a solution per OSS note.

Urgent Issue in FBL5N transaction

Hi Experts,
I need your very urgent help.
I am executing FBL5N then enter inputs as 'Customer Account' , 'Company Code' and Check "Check Box: Parked Items and Open key date "today's date". Rest of the input fields are left blank. Press F8
I see Customer Line Item display as expected.
Now Issue begins here. In Quality, When I double click on any line item...It opens *Display parked customer invoice XXXXX( Transaction FV73,Program SAPMF05A Sub-Screen SAPLFDCB)
In Production, When I double click on any line item...It opens Display Parked Document : Overview ( Transaction FBL5N ,Program SAPLF040 Screen 700)
Could anybody please let me know...Why is such dual behavior of system. For same double click on Customer item line, SAP is displaying the different screen in quality and different one in Production.
Thanks in Advance.
Ratnesh

This is a user specific setting
Ask the user to go to FB00 transaction,
In that go to the line item tab and there you will find a setting "Item selection goes to", select the option you want there and the system will change the behaviour.
Thanks
Naveen

Issue in scheduling transaction MEMASSPO.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for