ISSUE REGARDING ME21N TRANSACTION.

HI,
IN ME21N TRANSACTON, FOR ONE PO NUMBER THERE WILL BE MULTIPLE ITEMS. MY ISSUE IS THOSE MULTIPLE ITEMS WE ENTER SHOULD BE OF THE SAME PLANT. THAT IS, IN FIRST LINE ITEM ,IF WE ENTER PLANT AS 400,THEN FROM THE NEXT LINE ITEM IT SHOULD ALLOW ALL OTHER ROWS RELATED TO THAT 400 ONLY. IF ANY PLANT IS ENTERED OTHER THAN 400 IN SUBSEQUENT ROWS ,THEN IT SHOULD DISPLAY THE ERROR MESSAGE THAT "ONLY 400 PLANT IS ALLOWED BUT NOT OTHERS."
PLZ LET ME KNOW THE RELAVANT USER-EXIT AND THE CODE TO DO THIS .
POINTS WILL BE AWARDED. THIS IS URGENT REQUIRMENT.
PLZ LET ME KNOW AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
THANKING U IN ADVANCE,
A.SRINIVAS.

Hi,
capslock unlocked:
In me21n transacton, for one po number there will be multiple items. My issue is those multiple items we enter should be of the same plant. That is, in first line item ,if we enter plant as 400,then from the next line item it should allow all other rows related to that 400 only. If any plant is entered other than 400 in subsequent rows ,then it should display the error message that "only 400 plant is allowed but not others."
Plz let me know the relavant user-exit and the code to do this .
Points will be awarded. This is urgent requirment.
Plz let me know as soon as possible.
Thanking u in advance,
A.srinivas.
Look you here:
In this step, you develop enhancements for Purchasing.
The following SAP enhancements are available for the Purchasing area:
AMPL0001
User subscreen for additional AMPL data (Manufacturer part number)
LMELA002
Adoption of batch number from shipping notification at time of posting of a goods receipt
LMELA010
Incoming shipping notification: adoption of item data from IDoc
LMEQR001
User exit for source determination
M06B0001
Role determination for release of requisitions
M06B0001
Changes to communication structure for release of requisitions
M06B0003
Number range and document number
M06B0004
Number range and document number
M06B0005
Changes to communication structure for overall release of purchase requisitions
M06E0004
Changes to communication structure for release of purchasing document
M06E0005
Role determination for release of purchasing documents
ME590001
Grouping of requisitions for PO split in transaction ME59
MEETA001
Determination of schedule line type (backlog, immediate requirement, forecast)
MEFLD004
Determination of earliest delivery date for checking at time of goods receipt (PO only)
MELAB001
Generation of forecast delivery schedule: realization via creation profile
MEQUERY1
Enhancement for document overview ME21N / ME51N
MEVME001
Calculation of default GR quantity and over/underdelivery tolerances
MM06E001
User exits for inbound EDI messages and outbound purchasing documents
MM06E003
Number range and document number
<b>MM06E004
Control of import data screens in purchase orders
MM06E005
Customer fields in purchasing documents</b>
MEREQ001
Customer's own data in purhcase requisitions
MM06E007
Change document for requisitions when converting into POs
MM06E008
Monitoring of contract target value in case of release orders
MM06E009
Relevant texts for "Texts exist" indicator
MM06E010
Field selection for vendor address
MM06E011
Activation of requisition block
MM06L001
Exits for determination of ratings in vendor evaluation
MMAL0001
ALE source list distribution: outbound processing
MMAL0002
ALE source list distribution: inbound processing
MMAL0003
ALE purchasing info record distribution: outbound processing
MMAL0004
ALE purchasing info record distribution: inbound processing
MMDA0001
Default values for delivery addresses
MMFAB001
User exit for generation of releases
MRFLB001
Control items during release creation
LWBON001
Enhancement of LIS update through extension of the communication structure MCKONA (business volumes and rebate income)
LWBON003
Change settlement data for end-of-period rebate settlement before creation of settlement documents
LWSUS001
Customer-specific source determination in Retail
Regards,
Clemens

Similar Messages

Issue regarding refreshing transaction iview

Hi gurus,
the issue is,
end user has transaction iview and url iview ,
transaction iview is created using GUI for windows, so that he/she can enter any transaction.
SESSION_MANAGER is the tcode assignd to enduser in transaction iview,
the problem is ,if user is using SE38 and then he click on url iview tab in top level navigation and click on transaction iview tab or refreshes the page then the transaction in transaction iview comming back to SESSION_MANAGER.
client need same transaction to be displayed even after refreshing page or navigationg to other tab.
Regards
K Naveen Kishore.

Hi Naveen,
If you switch navigate to another iview and then back to your transaction iview, or refresh the portal page, you restart the iview with all its initial settings - including transaction. It seems you want to somehow suspend the state of the interaction with the SAPGUI, even between openings in the portal window. That's not possible.
What you could do is set the SAPGUI to open in a new window (this is always the case if you use the SAP Shortcut File starting technique) - then the user interacts with this window for all his transaction-based work and uses the original window for portal activities. Alternatively create a role structure that includes all the transactions of interest to the particular user group, and have them switch between transactions in this way rather than by entering commands in the SAPGUI command field.
Regards, Rory

Issue regarding Receiving Transaction Processor (ROI)

Hi Experts,
We have EBS 11i (11.5.10.2) .
At the time of PO Receipt thru application, the following 3 concurrent processes are running.
(1) Receiving Transaction Processor
(2) Receipt Traveller Concurrent program
(3) Journal Import
After creating the receipt thru application, we can modify the taxes at receipt time also.
Now, same thing we are doing with Interface.
In this scenario, the receipt is created successfuly thru Interface.
Right now, we are running the process : *'Receiving Transaction Processor'* manually for the same.
After running this process, the second process: *'Receipt Traveller Concurrent program'* is not running. In place , process : *'India - Receiving Transaction Processor'* is running.
Also, For receipt created thru interface, we cannot modify the taxes
Can anyone guide me , what we have to do to run the process: *'Receipt Traveller Concurrent program'* and to change the taxes.
KFI, the we have taken processing_mode_code = 'BATCH' in RCV_TRANSACTIONS_INTERFACE table.
regards
Sanjay

Hi PS,
Thanks for reply.
we want to control the receiving transaction processor .
when we are running the process : ' receiving transaction processor ' through interface, another process : ' India - Receiving Transaction ' is automatically fired that we do not want . Due to this , the taxes are freezed at receipt level and we cannot modify the same.
I hope you understood the scenario.
Sanjay

Screen Layout Issue in ME21N Transaction (Purchase Order Creation)

Hi,
we had recently upgraded our system from R3 4.6'c to Version ECC 6.0
in this i had observed that earlier layout of purchase order screen is changed.
1. Material Column is not visible in default layout. however i had check in table settings of item overview Screen. This Field is hidden. I tried to make it visible but didnt get success.
secondly, Pricing Schema layout at condition Tab at ITem Details level is also changed.
any idea, how to change their layout.
Regards,
Shiva

When you change the std settings that time you have to create your own variant and save in that variant and then enter that variant in variant filed and remove the use std settign check mark then you will see your fields are nothidden any more
about the pricing tab i can't help you because we are in ECC 5.0 so i don't know what u r taking

Regarding ME21N Transaction

Hi Guys,
Greetings.......
I need a helping hand of you in my search of code. I want to know the piece of code in ME21N
where SAPScript is called when we click on Print Preview push button.
Thanks in Advance,
Lekha.

Hi ,
If you are looking for the code which invokes "Print Preview ", then read the below,
In the include FM06PE02, there is a form call ENTRY_NEU, this is the entry point to print the form, notice that there is a function module in this form called ME_PRINT_PO. This is the function module that will print the PO.
Hope this helps you.
Reply if you need some more information.
Vikki.

Grayout of component screen fields in ME21N transaction

Hi experts,
I have a problem while creating subcontracting PO i want to gray out the fields of component screen...in ME21N transaction...is it possible through the screen varient or else should i go for exit ??...could u please help me in finding the right procedure...........
Best Regards,
shanker

Go to the screen where u want to make the changes.
Click on System -> Status. Double click on the screen Number (like 1121).
Then on the PBO module screen click on 'Layout'. You will go to graphical screen painter.
Then DOUBLE CLICK on the column/field you want to gray out and on Attribute part, Program Input -> Not possible .(save + activate)
You will need an Access Key to change the standard SAP Screen...
Fawaz

Lsmw for me21n transaction

Hi ,
I had a problem while doing lsmw for me21n transaction. My problem is how to handle table control in that. can any one send some screen shots or link, how to do table control
Thanks & Regards,
sreehari
Moderator Message: Search for available information on the web before posting
Edited by: kishan P on Sep 3, 2010 9:51 AM

Hi ,
I had a problem while doing lsmw for me21n transaction. My problem is how to handle table control in that. can any one send some screen shots or link, how to do table control
Thanks & Regards,
sreehari
Moderator Message: Search for available information on the web before posting
Edited by: kishan P on Sep 3, 2010 9:51 AM

Issue on mb21 transaction

Hi sap fans,
I got one issue on mb21 ( material reservation) my client saying that while doing purchase order for every material backend one
reservation number generates automatically this reservation number automatically updates to eket, rseb table
but here my client doing reservation for same purchase order materials using
mb21 transaction in there for all materials only one reservation number will generate.
so did bdc like this fethched ekko,ekpo ,eket ,resb using given ebeln number then passed these matirials to mb21 recorded transaction but the drawback is ebeln,and ebelp fields are not available to store these values in mb21 transaction
so my client gave men another modification is if he change purchase order quantity we have compare the difference of quantity using porder material with mb21 generated reservation then do reservation for that difference quantity only else modify that quantity using mb21 transaction
mb21 generated reservation number we cant get ebeln and ebelp values so how to resolve this issue
Regards
Udaya Bhasker Bandi

hi This is issue is aswered

How to update Partner function tab in ME21N Transaction

Dear Guru's,
I have a requirement to call a selection screen in ME21N transaction which will show list of vendors available. the selected vendor in the selection screen should be updated with parnter function 'CR' in the Parnter function tab of ME21N Transaction and EKPA table also.
Thanks & Regards,
Sridhar R Perumalla.

Hi,
Use the function module MM_UPDATE_PARTNERS for updation ....and wite the code in ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST badi in process_header method...
in PROCESS_HEADER method use GET_DATA to get the entered vendor number in PO.
Thanks,
Shailaja Ainala.

Error in ecatt testing for me21n transaction.

Hi All,
I have created Test script, test data container and Test configuration for ME21N (create purchase order) transaction
While executing test configuration, I got below error message.
S00349 Field COBL-KOSTL. does not exist in the screen SAPLMEGUI 0014
Please help me for further action.
Many thanks
Vikas

Hi Vikas,
Before running the test configuration, Please check ME21N transaction manually and find out the field
COBL-KOSTL and check whether it is mandatory or not.
If it found check your script whether that field is properly recorded or not.
May be this field is newly added as mandatory for that transaction
Regards,
Santosh.
Edited by: ABAP Santosh on Oct 19, 2009 9:17 AM

Facing some issue regarding Requisition interface table

I am facing some issue regarding Requisition interface table..
Purpose: we have to massage data & create massage data & create Requisitions.
Issue Detail:
Before:
Previously it was Auto Create Purchase Requisition
On the move transaction form step 10 to 20, this step will trigger creation of requisition.
and Creating Requisition successfully.
After:
After stopping Auto Create Purchase Requisition functionality the Requisition interface data is not getting populated in the Requisition Interface tables as well.
Please provide your inputs.

It's standard functionality not to populate the req interface while you don't want to autocreate.
Thanks,
PS.

I am having an issue regarding a placed order via customer service department

I recently relocated to Anchorage Alaska as part of a permanent change of station per the United States Air Force. I was initially located on the East Coast in the lower 48 and at the time of activating my contract I had purchased two separate Iphone 4 devices. I also recently went in to a store in February to purchase a Nexus 7 as well.
Upon arrival in Anchorage I had multiple issues regarding the Iphone 4 devices including being unable to send and receive text messages & imessages, unable to make phone calls, dropped phone calls, unable to utilize GPS, as well as not being able to access general account information and use anything related to web browsing or data usage. It was determined that because the Iphone 4 operates on the 3g network and Verizon does not have a 3g network in Alaska, as a result I was utilizing an extended service network from another carrier. As a result of this I am only able to use my Iphone 4 devices while connected to my wi-fi network while within my home, which is totally unacceptable.
I was not made aware that I would be dealing with this when I moved to Alaska and inquired as the the use of the devices I currently owned prior to purchasing the tablet. I was assured by three separate store employees one of which being a manager that all devices would function at 100% efficiency including the Iphone 4s. In fact I was recently billed 350$ for roaming charges last month, which prompted me to speak with a representative via the online chat regarding the significant increase she said that she was unable to process any sort of credit to the account regardless of what I had been told at a local Verizon store where I purchased the tablet.
As a result of all of these mishaps since arriving here in Alaska I determined I was in need of newer devices that utilize the 4G LTE network currently provided by Verizon in Alaska. I know for a fact that the 4G LTE works great up here because my Nexus 7 tablet runs flawlessly and does not incur roaming charges when utilizing the 4G LTE network.
Yesterday I attempted to contact Verizon through the live chat feature regarding upgrading two of the devices on my account. The live chat representative immediately asked me when my upgrade date was. Upon telling her my upgrade date 9/29/2014 she told me I should contact the customer service department as I might be eligible for an early upgrade. I then proceeded to contact the customer service department using my Iphone 4.
My attempt to speak to anyone in the customer service department resulted in a merry-go-round of being put on hold 6 separate times by two different employees, both of which had me wait for more than an hour while they attempted to speak to a manager to gain approval for an early upgrade. The first rep seemed almost sure she would be able to have my devices upgraded early especially considering the issues I was having regarding service.
The second rep seemed newer and was very dodgy about my questions and was very unwilling to help at first. He even mentioned that I had been a Verizon customer for almost two years, had never missed a single payment and had outstanding account history which should have garnered some sort of importance to the level of my request. But I digress, during this time I was disconnected from the call twice from each separate representative.
Both reps assured me they would call me back, I never did get a call back from either one of those reps and I was becoming very frustrated having waited four hours trying to find some sort of solution to my current predicament.
After waiting an hour for the second representative to call back I grew impatient and contacted the customer service department, was put on hold again, and finally reached a third customer service representative who was able to provide a solution for me.
I explained everything I had been dealing with to Cory ID # V0PAC61, both regarding the phones, the issue of the level of service I was receiving, the dire need for working devices and the multiple times I had been disconnected. I explained to him as a result of these issues I was certainly considering switching to a different provider, a local provider even who could provide me the adequate service that I require for my mobile devices.
I explained to Cory that I had been with Verizon for almost two years, and I had been on a relatives account prior to owning my own Verizon account and had never received this kind of treatment when trying to work towards a simple solution. Cory proceeded to tell me he needed to put me on hold to see if there was anything that could be done regarding the upgrades of the device considering all of the trouble I had been dealing with.
After Cory reconnected with me in the phone call he was able to successfully reach a solution by allowing me to upgrade my devices. We conversed about the options available and I eventually decided to upgrade both Iphone 4 devices to Moto X devices as we determined those would be sufficient for my needs while in Alaska. I also proceeded to add two Otter Box Defender cases to the order so that the devices would have sufficient protection. Cory inquired as to whether or not I would like to purchase insurance for the phones as well and I opted for the $5.00 monthly insurance which including damage and water protection.
Cory explained to me the grand total for the devices which included an activation fee of $35.00 for each device, $49.99 for each Otter Box case, and an additional $50.00 for each device which would be refunded as a rebate upon receipt of the devices and activation, a rebate that I would be required to submit. Cory explained to me that the devices would most likely arrive Tuesday of 6/17 and no later than Wednesday 6/18.
Cory took my shipping information and told me everything was all set and the only thing left to do was to transfer me to the automated service so that I could accept the 2 year agreement for both devices. I thanked him very much, took his name and ID# so that I might leave positive feedback about his exemplary customer service and was then transferred to the automated service.
Once transferred to the automated service I was then prompted to enter both telephone numbers for the devices that would be upgraded, I was then required to accept the new 2 year agreement for both devices and after doing so I was required to end the call. I did so in an orderly fashion and expected a confirmation # to arrive in my email regarding the placed order.
I have never received a confirmation email. I decided to sleep on it and assumed a confirmation email would be sent sometime tomorrow. Nothing has since been received however. I woke up early this morning around 6AM Alaska time to speak to another live chat representative, Bryan, in the billing department who assured me the order was currently processing and verified the order #. I asked him whether or not it was typical for a customer to not receive a confirmation email for an order placed and he said it can sometimes take up to 2-3 business days. He then stated that he had taken note of the issues I was experiencing and told me he would transfer me to the sales department as they would be able to provide more information regarding the shipment of both devices and a confirmation email, as he stated he did not want me to have to wait any longer than necessary to receive said devices.
I was then transferred to Devon in the sales department via the live chat service where I was then required to repeat everything I had said to both Bryan and the other representatives I had spoken too. After a lengthy discussion and repeating everything I have just wrote he told me the order was indeed processing and that he would send a confirmation email in the next 30 minutes.
That was 2 hours ago. It is now 8am Alaska time and I still have not received a confirmation email regarding my order. I was sent an email by Verizon an hour ago stating I had a device to "discover". The email contained no information regarding the shipment of my device, the order confirmation number, or anything regarding my account. The email I received was a typical spam email asking an individual to check out the current available phones and sign up for a new contract.
All I want is a confirmation email to assure that the devices are being sent. I need my phone for work and to communicate with my family in the lower 48. I desperately need to make sure that the device is in fact being sent to the proper address, this is why a confirmation email of the order is so important. I do not care about the shipping speed I just want what I ask to be taken care of for a change. I would hate to sit here unable to determine what the status of my devices are only for the order to be stuck in "processing" limbo and be unable to receive the devices when I was told they would be sent.
I feel I have been given the run around treatment way more than is typically given with any company when an individual is trying to work towards a solution. I have been patient and cordial with everyone I have spoken with, I have not raised my voice or shown stress or anger towards the situation I have only tried my best to work towards a solution with anyone I have spoken too but I am becoming increasingly frustrated with this situation.
Any help regarding this matter would be greatly appreciated. This situation has left a sour taste in my mouth and if the devices were indeed not actually processed in an order, or they were not shipped correctly, or in fact if the order had never existed at all it will only deter me from keeping my Verizon account active and affect my decision to switch to another provider.

Hello APVzW, we absolutely want the best path to resolution. My apologies for multiple attempts of replacing the device. We'd like to verify the order information and see if we can locate the tracking number. Please send a direct message with the order number so we can dive deeper. Here's steps to send a direct message: http://vz.to/1b8XnPy We look forward to hearing from you soon.
WiltonA_VZW
VZW Support
Follow us on twitter @VZWSupport

Issue regarding Planning layout is not getting rendered and is dumping at : CL_RSDRC_TREX_QUERY_LAYER ~ _GET_PARTPROVS_WITH_TREX_PART in SAP TPM IP

Gurus,
I am facing an issue regarding SAP TPM IP ( HANA)
I have 3 Infoproviders
Planning infocube, Planning DSO1, Planning DSO2 and i created multiprovider and added these 3 infoproviders into it. I have created Aggregation level on multiprovider. Created Bex Input ready query on Aggregation level.
Issue is Planning layout is not getting rendered and is dumping at : CL_RSDRC_TREX_QUERY_LAYER ~ _GET_PARTPROVS_WITH_TREX_PART.
I tried debugging it and found it is trying to read i_r_pro -> n_ts_part. It is populated with only 3 values (i.e. 2DSOs and 1 Cube), whereas <l_partprov>-partprov is referring to Aggergation level, hence read statement isn't successful, it is dumping.
The class CL_RSD_INFOPROV_CACHE->GET() method is trying to populate the N_TS_PART.N_TS_PART uses P_R_INFOPROV table which seems to be already populated. So, I debugged all the below methods to find out how the P_R_INFOPROV but couldn't find any clue.
Can any one help,it would be really help.
Thanks
Ashok

Hello Gregor,
On the launch of planning layout it throws an error message:
Planning is not possible RSCRM_IMP_CORE008.
When I debugged, i got to a point wherein
particular Real Time Planning DSO is
not getting retrieved under the MultiProivder in below class.
Class: CL_RSCRM_IMP_ACTIONS_SERVICE, Method: GET_INFOPROV is not
returning the real time Info-Provider Name(i.e. Planning DSO)
underlyingthe Multiprovider.
I've also tried to run the report mentioned by you for the Multiprovider but issue still exists.
Let me know, if you have any pointers on this topic.
Thanks,
Jomy

Have an issue regarding library books. My ereader is validated with Kobo account and Adobe Digital Editions account, but I get an error: 'this document is protected bij DRM and isn't available with your Adobe ID'.

Have an issue regarding library books. My ereader is validated with Kobo account and Adobe Digital Editions account, but I get an error: 'this document is protected bij DRM and isn't available with your Adobe ID'.

same problem for me. I am using abe edition 3 as I don't think 4 can be used with kobo. Book has been downloaded to kobo but it can't be read as it is not authorised.Help please

Payroll issue regarding the Claims - /561 and /563

Hi Payroll Experts,
I have a payroll issue regarding the Claims - /561 and /563 (October PY Run)
When i m runnning the Current month Payroll(October PY Run), Total Earning - total deductions are not matching with Net Pay. later i came to know that the system creates the WT /561 and deducts from the Net Pay.
But as per the Employee Payment Details , there is no recovery required from the employee for the past one year. But even then the system creates the WT /561. and deducts the same from NET Pay.
The followng are the WT details
IN - Period
OCT 2011
     /101 Total gross amount     118,897.00
     /110 Net payments/deductions     76,070.00-
     /550 Statutory net pay     95343
     /551 Stat.net recalc.diff.     37,692.00-
     /552 Stat.net subs.adjustment      37,692.00-
     /559 Bank transfer                                                   34,317.00
     /560 Net pay     37,218.00
     /563 Claim from previous month     5,609.00
FOR Period
Sept- Oct
     /101 Total gross amount     49,213.00
     /110 Net payments/deductions      31,721.00-
     /550 Statutory net pay     41,529.00
     /551 Stat.net recalc.diff.     14,591.00
     /552 Stat.net subs.adjustment     23,101.00-
     /553 Recalc.diff.to last payr.     37,692.00
     /559 Bank transfer                                                   14,591.00
     /560 Net pay     14,591.00
     /561 Claim     5,609.00
I request some body to throw siome light on the same.

Hi Experts,
Thanks for everyone for replying to my query ,
I have a doubt that If you check the WTs /551 and /552 in the IN PRD, the negative sign is coming for both the WTs
Is it correct?
And also, Assume that there may be a master data changes like Bank details and other deduction Wts happened in the month of Aug and now i m going to run the payroll for the month of Nov,
some of the employees having differences in the Net Pay, Eventhough the employee is having sufficient balances.
So how do i handle this issue
IS ther any way to solve this differences?
Please Let me know how to solve this issue.
Thanks

ISSUE REGARDING ME21N TRANSACTION.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for