Issue in wm during posting differences in li21

Hi
i have an issue in ecc6 R/3 sap LE-WM, when i am doing confirmation in LT12 and haveing some differences that are posted to the 999 storage type. When i am clearing differences in LI21 i am getting error NO MATERIAL DOCUMENT WAS CREATED, ERRORS OCCURED DURING POSTING, THERE IS NO ITEM CATEGORY ASSIGNED TO ACCOUNT 233000/INT. hOW TO SOLVE THIS PROBLEM
Narendra kumar

Hello Narendra,
When you clear the inventory difference with LI21 at that time system is trying to create material document and to post the difference in this g/l account "233000" for CoA INT and it finds problem.
Please copy the detailed message or contact FI expert.
Regards
Arif Mansuri

Similar Messages

Error during Post Goods Issue of Material in VL02N for STO Purchase Order

I am getting one error message during Post goods issue of Material for STO Purchase order.
I am doing the Post goods issue in T code VL02N
Error is " Account type D is not defined for Document type WL"
What is the settings required to be done.
Thanks,
Shailendra

Please check Plant customer master reconsilation account properly maintained or not in XD03 transaction.

Posting difference for a PID - error

Dear All,
An error message encountered while Posting difference for a PID "A difference can only be posted for period 09 2010".
How can I resolve this issue and post the differences?
pls suggest
regards,
Shetty

Hi,
Just check Material Ledger actiavated for the material ( can be checked in accounting -1 view) which you wnat post PID. Check if standard price of material appears more than one valuation & valuation takes price from seperate cost estimate .Check with FICO consultant for to run cost estimate more than once with different costing variants each period or not & if yes, its effects!
Regards,
Biju K

Error occurred during post handling RS_AFTER_IMPORT for UPDR L

Hi friends,
I need your help for 2 issues related to transport
I am getting error while transporting the request from BW DEV to BW QAS..Please help me regarding this issue..
1.)Error occurred during post handling RS_AFTER_IMPORT for UPDR L
       The errors affect the following components:
      BW-WHM (Warehouse Management)
2.)Start of the after-import method RS_UPDR_AFTER_IMPORT for object type(s) UPDR (Activation Mode)
       Error when activating update rule
       IC=0CRM_PROD IS=0PR_IL_PROREF_ATTR error when checking update rules.
Friends these are the two issues im facing while doing the transports._i have checked the update rules in the BW DEV it is working fine._please give some solutions to overcome this issues.
Thanks
Gnana Baskar

Hi Gnana,
Since u r telling tht the update rules are working fine in the Dev system, request u to perform some checks:
1. The Update rule needs to be in active version.
2. The InfoObjects used in the target InfoProvider should be present in the QA system/attached to the request in which u r transporting the changed Update Rule.
3. Manually add objects, if needed all the Before/After objects in the new request and reactivate the Update rule, if it asks for a request give this new request number.
4. Compare the data model in Dev and QA system and try finding the disconnect between them.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Kunal Gandhi

Customisation of goods issue,goods receipt,transfer posting,stock transfer

hi,
how to do customisation of goods issue,goods receipt,tranfer posting and stock transfer.
thanks
katrina

Hi,
You can do customization in following;
SPRO > MM > Inventory Management and Physical Inventory > Goods Issue / Transfer Postings
- Create Storage Location Automatically
- Set Manual Account Assignment
- Define Screen Layout
- Maintain Copy Rules for Reference Documents
- Set Up Dynamic Availability Check
- Generate Physical Inventory Documents for Goods Movements
- Allow Negative Stocks
And SPRO > MM > Inventory Management and Physical Inventory > Goods Receipt
- Set Tolerance Limits
- Create Storage Location Automatically
- Create Purchase Order Automatically
- Set Manual Account Assignment
- Define Screen Layout
- Maintain Copy Rules for Reference Documents
- Set Dynamic Availability Check
- Set "Delivery Completed" Indicator
- Set Missing Parts Check
- For GR-Based IV, Reversal of GR Despite Invoice
- Set Expiration Date Check
- Price Differences for Subcontract Orders at Goods Receipt
- Activate Storage of Incoming Documents

Account determination Issue in the GR posting

Hi SAP Experts,
I am facing below issue ,
I have created PO for Intercompany stock tarnsfer with PO type NB. While posting GR it is updating GL 650000. But for itercompany transfer we need posting to diffrent acc as 650001. for that i haved defined new acc determination process with Transaction event key as ZIC for Valuation class 3100. But when i do posting it still updating gl 650000, I need posting to GL 65000.
Client has activated Purchase Account Mangement process does it affects this posting, because GL to which currently system is posting is assigned to Transaction EIN(Purchase account ) from OBYC. If I deactivate Purchase account Management process then there are simple inventory postings to BSX and WR, but with this inventory posting i need posting to another account which is for intercomany purchase or revenue..This GL account is other than account for BSX and WRX.
Any resolution would be appriciated.
Thanks and Regards,
Rahul

Hi Ashok,
Thanks for quick response.
I did settings in the OBYC. But where i need to do settings you mentioned in the second para.
i.e. After Creating New GL account and Account key, You need to assign the same to Valuation class - GL account - Account key.
I assigned GL and Vlauation class to ZIC in the OBYC.But still getting same result during posting.

Slow start up and no Apple logo during post

Greetings everyone and Happy Holidays.
My question deals with my son's mini which is configured slightly different than mine. His has 256mb ram, no super drive, he has the 1.42 cpu and 80gig HD.
The problem is slow start up / post speed and slow overall system performance compared to my mini and my grandson's mini. My grandson's mini is exactly the same configuration as my son's and they are networked at home and have a broadband cable connection to the net.
We didn't realize the difference in start up methods between our minis until recently when I restarted my son's system and noticed a screen filled with text scrolling down as the mini started up. I asked if this just started happening and he said it did it from the day he first started it up. Then I noticed there was no Apple logo like the other two mini's has during post.
We compared settings between my grandson's mini and my son's system but didn't really find much. We tried reinstalling 10.4 with no change. We looked at the system resources and didn't really see much other than the system showed only having about 4 mb ram free. We are all running OS 10.4.3 with all the recent updates.
It takes a good 2 minutes for this thing to boot compare to our mini's taking about 45 seconds. I didn't look at start up items in his ACCOUNTS area and I'm not currently at his computer. Thanks for any help you can give.
We LOVE our mini's and I'm sorry I put up with MS for all these years. Apple truely does have a well designed, well built, reliable product.
Thanks,
Kenny G

Hi again.
Thank you all for your replies. I will be talking to my son shortly and will pass - on your info.
Upon returning to this forum to see the replies I got to my question, I reviewed my original post and it seems a bit confusing so, I'll summarize with more clarity.
Me, my eldest son and his son (my grandson), all have mini's. I bought my son his mini first (1). Then about 3 months later I bought my grandson his mini (2). Finaly, about 3 weeks ago, I bought mine (3).
Now, my son and my grandson have pretty much the exact same mini and they are configured like this:
CPU = 1.42gig
RAM = 256mb
HD = 80gig
WiFi = not installed
Bluetooth = not installed
DVD/CD = combo drive
OS ver = 10.4.3 Tiger
Both of these are networked in my son's house.
My grandson's mini (2) runs much faster AND (this is what concerns me with my son's mini (1)) the boot sequence does NOT show anything on the screen until the Apple logo appears then contiues to boot to his login screen - all taking about 45 seconds. This appears to be a normal (good) boot sequence, which is the exact same method that MY mini goes through at boot.
NOW - My son's mini boots very slow and what concerns me with his mini is that the system boots showing text such as what you would see when a DOS system boots, batch files running and such. All this text scrolling up the screen certainly does not show one my grandson's mini nor mine.
I did the reinstall of Tiger 10.4 but I did NOT do a clean install.
So, mini (1) boots and runs slow, showing a bunch of stuff on the screen during boot. Mini (2), which is the exact same mini, boots fast and runs almost as fast as my mini.
Anyway, I hope this helps clear up my problem and will be awaiting any further info. Thank's
Kenny G

Errors occurred during post-handling PRGN_AFTER_IMP_ACTGROUP_ACGR for ACGR

Hi,
I have to import composite role from development to QAS system.I have generated profile for each role in developemnt & create transport of composite role & moved it in QAS.But in QAS it finished with Return code 8 & I found profiles are not moved in QAS for all single roles.
Error is as follows.
Errors occurred during post-handling PRGN_AFTER_IMP_ACTGROUP_ACGR for ACGR L
The errors affect the following components:
BC-SEC-USR-PFC (Authorization and Role Management)
Please advice if anybody faced such kind of issue.
Regards
Santosh

Rephrased a'la Julius:
> To avoid the problems during the subsequent import into a target client, the AGR_NUM_2 table can be maintained as customizing for the clients (plural) in the source development system where the roles are maintained. If more than one client is used for role development, a number range gap of 50000 between the clients should be sufficient to prevent profile name collisions (otherwise you have much bigger problems anyway...).
>
> This is because the system ID (sy-sysid) is used as an attribute in the generated profile's name, but not the client (sy-mandt). > The value set in the AGR_NUM_2 tables determines the current number per client of the next sequential number to be used for profile generation. The customer can initialize this number to insert an additional attribute per client to achieve unique generated names within client specified ranges.
Something like that
Cheers,
Julius

Can we set approval strategy at the POST DIFFERENCE of Physical Inventory?

dear All
During Pysical inventory posting Difference, how do we set approval procedure instead of using authorisation?
Any suggestion?
Point will be given handsomely for any good suggestion.

Hi,
Std SAP does not cater for a release strategy for Phy Inv posting...alternative u can do is
1. workflow trigger which PI variance report and do posting.
2. through authorization object...

D30 not seeing KB during post from back panel

This is a really more of an annoyance than an issue but I've noticed the D30's we're setting up don't see the KB during post when it's connected to the back USB ports on the Mobo. Front panel reads it fine. It's not connected to the USB 3.0 ports either (indeed it's on USB1 whichhas the KB logo).
Unit will generate a KB error then attempt a PXE boot (which fails) at which point it will sense the correct drive and boot normally. KB/mouse work fine once it's booted. The cloned machine has the issue; the donor does not. Identical BIOS version / settings. I'm sure I'm missing something obvious; it's just perplexing since the front panel board works fine but the back panel doesn't - kinda counter intuitive. Sure I could enable a BIOS setting to ignore the keyboard but what fun would that be?

What BIOS version are you using?
Are you using the (Lenovo) standard USB keyboard or something 3rd party?
Any chance it's a false failure on the the failing system? Are you able to get into BIOS setup using F1 on the keyboard even though the system is logging a KB error?
Can't say I've seen this on any of our systems.

Ultra 40 hangs right before memory test during POST

While I do enjoy using my Sun Ultra 40 Workstation, there is one thing that bothers me. And I am wondering if I can get a help from you guys.
Before I describe what I am experiencing, I politely ask you not to tell me to go other place for using Windows O/S. :)
Anyway, here's what happens:
Ultra 40 hangs right before Mem check during POST (Power-On Self-Test) when rebooting after running h/w monitoring software such as Speedfan or EVEREST Ultimate Edition to see CPU temps or Fan speed of my Workstation.
It seems that my keyboard is working since I can warm-reboot by pressing Ctrl+Alt+Del and I can see Num Lock light goes on when pressing Num Lock key, but that's about it.
Even rebooting my system (either cold-boot or warm-boot) won't help me getting through POST. And I won't be able to go into the BIOS (CMOS) Setup Menu, since Menu screen comes up after Memtest during POST. As I stated before, it just doesn't do anything when it's supposed to run Memtest during POST. Plus there is no BIOS (CMOS) menu to turn Memtest off.
Only way to make my system to pass the POST process is to disconnect the actual power cord and reconnect it. Then it reboots fine.
Does anyone know what's going on?
Is this BIOS firmware related bug?
I am desperately seeking for help.

Unfortunately, this shining blue globe we all live on
is split into regions of responsibility as far as Sun's techsupport is concerned.
Consequently, system serial numbers are registered for their respective geographical regions.
Asia and Pacific is referred to with an abbreviation of APAC.
Europe, Middle East, and Africa is the EMEA area for support.
The Western Hemisphere is further split. North America is one support region
and Central America is grouped with South America for their own support responsibilities.
In this way, Sun gets local people to help where the equipment is sold, without any language barriers.
You need to go back to your local support center, refer back to your case number,
and request they go through an escalation procedure for a second examination.
If this effects you there is a chance it may effect thousands of owners of that model computer.
They send it through escalation reviews in your APAC support,
and they may decide to open a North American case, for the sole purpose of a review of the issue.
(After a local escalation, they may not need to consult North America,
because there may already be an answer in a database that your first engineer overlooked.)
There is no mandatory rule that they must escalate out of their region.
Your local Sun Microsystems people get back to you on your local case number
when there is any sort of an answer.
This may all seem complicated or maybe have too many layers of procedure,
but it is done so that everyone in Sun gets it all documented
into the troubleshooting databases, and gets trained where to find the answers.

Termination during posting activity confirmation

Dear All,
Actually we have transported all the number ranges from Dev - Golden Client to Dev - Testing Client.
Now when we carried out few confirmations, we were not getting error as such. Suddenly if you see, we have got the error " System error: Termination during posting" while confirming the activity.
As such, we have changed the current number in transcation KANK - Check Number Ranges for CO Postings. Then, for the first confirmation it worked out and confirmation was saved. Again while doing the next confirmation, the same error persists and if we again change the current number in KANK, it is getting saved. Subsequently, when you carry out the confirmation again the same error appears.
Could any one help on this.
Regards,
Arun.An

Hi,
Issue resolved...
Solution is:
We have found that we have a number range problem.
Logistic confirmations generate the corresponding CO and FI documents.
In this case, system is trying to generate a FI document which number is already used in the system.
We solved this problem in your system in the following way
1th Transaction FBN1
2th Company code FA10
3th Press button Status
4th Select the number range 10 for year 2011 and modify the
current number
In our case it was 1XX13XXXX43 and I modified by 1XX1XXX250
Regards,
Kanthi Reddy

Satellite Pro A - Beep signal during POST

Hello.
I have an issue with the BIOS POST check that annoys me. The issue is that when I restarting my computer or turn it on sometimes during POST (when a Toshiba logo appears) there is a beep sound signal. Mainly there is no signal but sometimes there is very noise.
So, the question is: Is it a problem in the hardware or is it a problem in the BIOS (by the way, I re-flashed BIOS several times - no result).
Thanks.

Thanks PinkPanther for your answer.
The problem occurs just sometimes, approx. after each second restart. I have two memory modules: 1x Kingston 2GB; 1x Samsung 1GB (both running at 667 MHz and have the same timings). Moreover, I had tested memory with Windows Memory Diagnostic tool: No problems detected.
Generally speaking, the machine works normally, but this beeping signal seems strange for me.
Hard drive is also OK. The SMART monitoring shows no problem with the drive.
Hope this info is useful.
Thanks for help.
Regards,
Osman.

Restrict goods issue if stock on posting date is zero

Requirement:
Current Inventory period : July 2011
Stock of a material from 01.07.2011 to 30.07.2011 is zero(in MB5B report)
I upload stock of material or GRN occur on 31.07.2011. Say Quantity u2013 100
Now stock as on 31.07.2011 is 100 in MB5B
Still, Stock of a material from 01.07.2011 to 30.07.2011 is zero(in MB5B)
Now, If I do goods issue of a material quantity 100 on 15.07.2011. System allows goods issue. though opening and closing stock as on 15.07.2011 is zero.
After goods issue transaction if I check stock of material on any date between 16.07.2011 to 30.07.2011 , The opening stock and closing stock shows negative.
I want to restrict goods issue if stock on posting date is zero or less then stock available on posting date.
Please suggest

Hi,
This is not the way SAP is designed. As the previous speakers wrote (and as you noticed yourself), SAP maintains stock figures in the database per month rather than per day. MB5B makes complex calculations in order to find out how much stock you had on a specific date - as you probably noticed on the response time. Performing such calculations every time you do a GI would be unfeasibly heavy task for the system - remember there are organisations that perform hundreds of inventory movements a minute!
An alternative solution I suppose would be to maintain the daily stock figures in the database. This would make the finding of the stock figure very quick, but on the other hand, the maintenance of such table would be unfeasible - if you post today a GI on say July 1st, you would need to calculate 36 stock figures and update 36 database records!
Hope this explains the technical issue.
BR
Raf

Issue while doing material posting through Usage Decision

Hi all,
I have an issue while doing material posting through Usage Decision. Please find below the details.
Inspection Lot 10000604689
Material        1730PCPBS.0031
Batch           QP611097      GQ02
Out of total qty of 2100 we need to post the following
To unrestricted use                     2,098
To sample usage                         2
Following error appears,
Deficit of SL Stck.in qual.insp 1,638 NO : 1730PCPBS.0031 62GQ GQ02 QP611097
Message no. M7021
Diagnosis
Shortfall below the specified stock level or quantity amounting to 1,638 NO.
System Response
If the message is an error message (E), the above is not allowed.
If the message is a warning message (W), the system will allow your input, but the warning is intended to prevent you entering a wrong quantity.
Procedure
In the case of a warning message, check the quantity entered.
In the case of an error message, change the quantity or terminate processing.
I have checked that quantity 2100 of material 1730PCPBS.0031 is in QI stock. Kindly advice what is the issue and why we are getting the error?
Regards,
Brijesh

Hi Brijesh,
What is the status of inspection lot?
One of the possibilities I think could be inconsistencies between MM and QM.
Have a look on SAP note 48815- Checking possible inconsistencies between MM and QM.
Regards,
Anand Rao

Issue in wm during posting differences in li21

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for