Issue Tracking Posting Level

The HCM team has approximately 650 issues logged for our 4.6C system (over a 3 year period). Our potential usage of the Solution Mgr issue logging will be quite extensive. We would like to have our issues logged at the Project level as well as the Solution level. The system allows for this type of logging. However, the available Issue report does not report in this fashion.
The HCM group would like to report and record issues at the Solution level based on the need to not always remember which project the issue is filed under. We then experimented with the Solution Reporting to test how issues would be picked using the selection screen provided.
Our results show that if an issue is reported at the Solution level it does not get displayed if a project is selected thru Solution reporting selection variant. The report selection criteria seems to be an "either or" meaning by project or by Solution but not both which we would see using.
We were wondering what the intent is or best practice recommendation for filing issues is. Solution level or Project level
Thanks in advance
Ron Taylor
TCDSB

Hi Benjamin,
The error can be caused by many reasons, so you need to check the ULS log for detailed error message.
For SharePoint 2010, by default, ULS log is at C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Web Server Extensions\14\LOGS.
In the meanwhile, you can clear the configuration cache for SharePoint to see if the issue still occurs.
To clear the configuration cache, please follow the link below:
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/jamesway/archive/2011/05/23/sharepoint-2010-clearing-the-configuration-cache.aspx
Please also check if the issue is caused by the KB2844286 Security Update on SharePoint 2010 as Cameron suggested.
Best regards.
Thanks
Victoria Xia
TechNet Community Support

Similar Messages

To Bentley Wolfe, Adobe, re: Locked [ADOBE FYI] : Getting Support for Flash Player 10 and Issue Tracking post

Hi Bentley,
I wanted to tell you that an important link you posted does
not work and says "Sorry, this page is not available".
It is in your post entitled "Locked [ADOBE FYI] : Getting
Support for Flash Player 10 and Issue Tracking post", and is at
http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/webforums/forum/messageview.cfmforumid=44&catid=184&threadid= 1400586&enterthread=y.
The link that is non-functional is "If you have issues
installing Flash Player 10, first troubleshoot your issues using
http://www.adobe.com/support/flashplayer.
Read the technotes, do some testing.".
I just wanted you to know, since you have gone to all of the
effort of posting it. I apologize for having to start a new thread,
but I was unable to post to your thread, since it is locked and
read-only.
This is the issue I am dealing with myself, and desperately
need help with. :)
Thank you so very much,
Karen

Hi Bentley,
I just noticed something. The link that I pasted, to your
post, does not work either. I noticed why, however, and it seems to
be why the link in your original page does not work, and why the
link in my post that goes to your post does not work.
It seems to be that if a link has a period after it (i.e., if
it is at the end of a sentence), the period is incorrectly included
in the "real" link. Somehow, whatever mechanism that processes the
post has a mini bug in it.
If you go to the link that is results in "Sorry, this page is
not available", and look up into the browser address bar, you will
see the period there each time.
I just thought that I would point this out, too, so that the
web techs in charge of the workings of the forums could look into
it.
Here is the original link, without a period after it, to your
original page.
http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/webforums/forum/messageview.cfm?forumid=44&catid=184&threadid =1400586&enterthread=y
Thank you again,
Karen

Performance Issue Tracking In Database Level.

Hi All,
I am sorry, actually i dont know whether this is the right question to ask in this forum. Below is my question.
We are working on Oracle 10g and are supposed to moved to 11G. My question is which text book will be best one for getting knowledge regarding database performance issue in broad level and monitoring and resolving the issues. Please suggest.
Edited by: 930254 on Aug 22, 2012 7:56 AM

Troubleshooting oracle performance ( Apres) is one book I found very useful along with the Oracle documentation (http://www.oracle.com/pls/db112/to_toc?pathname=server.112/e10822/toc.htm).
btw, please mark the thread as 'answered', if you feel you got your question answered. This will save the time of others who search for open questions to answer.
regards,
CSM

Issue Tracker App - Error Message

Hello, all,
I'm trying to learn, basically by following the steps to produce the Issue Tracker application from the Tutorials section in Apex 3.1. The application was written for Apex 2.x and at one point wants me to put the following query into a report:
DECLARE
q VARCHAR2(32767); -- query
w VARCHAR2(4000) ; -- where clause
we VARCHAR2(1) := 'N'; -- identifies if where clause exists
BEGIN
q := 'SELECT "ISSUE_ID", '||
' "ISSUE_SUMMARY", '||
' "IDENTIFIED_BY", '||
' "RELATED_PROJECT", '||
' "ASSIGNED_TO", '||
' "STATUS", '||
' "PRIORITY", '||
' "TARGET_RESOLUTION_DATE", '||
' "ACTUAL_RESOLUTION_DATE" '||
' FROM "#OWNER#"."HT_ISSUES" ';
IF :P6_IDENTIFIED_BY != '-1'
THEN
w := ' IDENTIFIED_BY = :P6_IDENTIFIED_BY ';
we := 'Y';
END IF;
IF :P6_RELATED_PROJECT != '-1'
THEN
IF we = 'Y'
THEN
w := w || ' AND RELATED_PROJECT = :P6_RELATED_PROJECT ';
ELSE
w := ' RELATED_PROJECT = :P6_RELATED_PROJECT ';
we := 'Y';
END IF;
END IF;
IF :P6_ASSIGNED_TO != '-1'
THEN
IF we = 'Y'
THEN
w := w || ' AND ASSIGNED_TO = :P6_ASSIGNED_TO ';
ELSE
w := ' ASSIGNED_TO = :P6_ASSIGNED_TO ';
we := 'Y';
END IF;
END IF;
IF :P6_STATUS != '-1'
THEN
IF we = 'Y'
THEN
w := w || ' AND STATUS = :P6_STATUS ';
ELSE
w := ' STATUS = :P6_STATUS ';
we := 'Y';
END IF;
END IF;
IF :P6_PRIORITY != '-1'
THEN
IF we = 'Y'
THEN
w := w || ' AND PRIORITY = :P6_PRIORITY ';
ELSE
w := ' PRIORITY = :P6_PRIORITY ';
we := 'Y';
END IF;
END IF;
IF we = 'Y'
THEN q := q || ' WHERE '|| w;
END IF;
RETURN q;
END;
When I do, I get the error "PLS-00372: In a procedure, RETURN statement cannot contain an expression." I googled the error and got the simple advice to turn the query into a function. Simple to many, yes, but not to me. Also, 3.1 does not allow the selection "SQL function returning a query" or some such, only an anonymous PL/SQL block.
Any help (at a very elementary level, please), please?
Thanks!

Hello,
the problem with your code is that it is designed as an PL/SQL body returning an SQL query not as an anonymous PL/SQL block.
Which version of ApEx are you using? I have taken a look into version 3.1 and there is the possibility to select 'SQL Query (n PL/SQL body returning an SQL query)'.
Regards, Tine.

How to add data in related issue field in issue tracking list sharepoint 2013

Hi,
I'm using out of box Issue Tracking List. In Related Issue I want to add some data like :- Business, Technical, HR, Contractor etc in right side so user can select one of them add it. Not sure how to add these data in Related Issue column. Please advice.

Related Issues is a lookup column to the same list which is Issue Tracking List. so you can add new items where title is Business, Technical, HR, Contractor etc then you will get those under related issues.
My Blog- http://www.sharepoint-journey.com|
If a post answers your question, please click Mark As Answer on that post and Vote as Helpful

URGENT HELP PLS : Issue with Multi Level Master Detail block

This is an issue someone else had posted in this forum few years back but there was no solution mentioned, I have run into this same issue , The problem is as explained below.
Any help on this is appreciated.
Scenario:
There are 3 Blocks in the form : A (Master Block)
: B (Detail of A )
: C (Detail of B )
There is master detail relation created between A and B and B and C. So initially when we query for a record in Master A, it shows all records properly in B and C.
Now if i navigate to the first record of B , and then second record of B , records corresponding to that record shows up properly in C block.
Till now everything works fine.
Issue 1:
But in case after querying initially on Master Block A,If I go directly to the second record of B block, it clears the whole B block and C block.
Issue 2:
Same thing happens if I am on C block ( corresponding to second record of B block) and then navigate to first record in B block , it again clears the whole B block and C block.
Please Help !!
Thanks !

Thanks Xem for Your reply , I tried those settings but it did not help..here is the original link that to the thread that talks about the same problem ,
Issue with Multi Level Master Detail block
The last update to this was the following :
"I figured out that this is happening because Block Status is set to 'Changed' and this is causing it to clear out the blocks.
But cant figure out why the status is setting to 'Changed' "
Any Help from the form Gurus on this form in this matter is truely appreicated !!
Thanks,
Zid.

Assignees don't appear in Issue Tracker Open Issues list?

Hi -
I've assigned names to open issues in the Application Express canned Issue Tracker application, and they appear everywhere - except in the Open Issues list.
Home -> Projects -> (Click on a project) -> Open Issues -> ("Assignee" fields say "Unassigned")
Home -> Issues -> (Click on an issue) (Issues have a name in the "Assigned To" field)
Am I doing something wrong?
Is there a problem in the code such that the "Assignee" field is an orphan and this should be the "Assigned To" field?
Dan Nygren

Hi Dan,
This sounds like a bug in the issue tracker, you might want to report it as such. Also this post belongs in the packaged application section really:
https://forums.oracle.com/community/developer/english/oracle_database/application_express/packaged-applications
Regards,
Joni

Adding new site columns to my issue tracking List, will result in having their Source field as blank inside the Issue content type

I have added an Issue tracking list to my SharePoint team site 2013. Then I wanted to add 5 extra columns to my list . So I did the following:-
I went to site settings.
Then I added 5 new site columns.
I went back to my list setting, I click on the “Issue” content type, and I added the 5 newly added site columns to my "Issue" content type , using the “Add from existing site or list columns” link as follow:-
And then these columns were added automatically inside the Edit, Create& Display forms.
But since this is the first time I work on such a task , so I want to make sure that I did every thing correctly. Because I am not sure why the 5 newly added site columns will have their source field inside the “Issue” content type as blank , as shown in
the above picture. So does this indicate that there is a problem ? or this is because I have added the 5 newly added site columns to the List content type and not inside the Content type at the site level ?
Thanks

Hi,
It’s by design, the Source field means the content type name.
As you said, when we create a new column, if we not attach the column to a content type, then the column would have not the source field option.
However, if you create a new column, then add the column in a content type, the content type would automatically update in the site.
Now, you would see a source content type appear.
Thanks & Regards,
Jason
Jason Guo
TechNet Community Support

What is Road map Analysis, Issue tracking,, Monitoring, Reporting?

Hi
Friends
what is Road map Analysis, Issue tracking,, Monitoring, Reporting?
can any one clear my doubts in detail full points will be given

Dear Venkat,
Your questions are very high level questions.
Roadmap Analysis: This term is generally used in SAP Implementation where we compare the project status with the SAP roadmap. Generally in ASAP Roadmap, we have SAP specified standard deliverables, and there can be custom deliverables as per the client's requirements. If we need to do an analysis of custom deliverables viz standard deliverables or standard roadmap viz custom roadmap, we call it as roadmap analysis.
Issue Tracking: Very broad level term - can be in Implementation as well as support projects. Issues are either support problems or implementation problems which are documented and recorded for solutioning and approval. These are generally steering committee terms used in a project.
Monitoring: Again a broad level term. Any watch process can be termed as monitoring. Eg: Monitoring of Backup; Monitoring of System health check etc.
Reporting: Again a broad level term. It is the same as defined in the english dictionary. Nothing related to any process in SAP with technical solution in mind.
Regards,
Anirban

What is the relationship between Change management and Issue tracking?

What is in general change management and what is issue tracking in a SAP point of view?

Hi
See this thread
Re: SAP APO
Additional inputs :
APO refers Advanced planned and optimizer
APO is similar to BW in the sense it is also a OLAP processor intended for reporting needs
Supply chain management
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/25/79eb3cad744026e10000000a11405a/frameset.htm

Issue while posting the invoice in background using the WF-BATCH user

Hi Friends,
I am facing an issue while posting the invoice in background using the WF-BATCH user. I am using a invoice approval workflow where in when the approver approvers the invoice the invoice document get posted using a background method, which uses BO FIPP and Method POST and i am returning the Message Text to my workflow container from this method. When i see the log an exception is rasied from this method with an error message "V004: You are not authorized to change this document", but WF-BATCH is having SAP_ALL and SAP_NEW authorizations. If i try to post the invoice using the method from my user id it is getting posted. What could be the issue. Please advice.

Hi Sapient,
The Parameter, Roles would be different for the LOGIN USER and WF-BATCH.. So ask your administrator
to set the Roles & Parameters similar to that of LOGIN USER to WF-BATCH.
For further refrence check in SU01 giving the LOGIN USER and then check with WF-BATCH... you would
find the difference...
Hope this would help you..
Good luck
Narin

Batch number issue when posting goods receipt for Subcontracting PO

Dear expert,
I always heard there will be issues while posting goods receipt for subcontracting PO. If the component is managered by batch.
No batch number will be proposed during PGR in MIGO...
I dont quite understand where is the issue??
My understanding:
We have batch managered components and End Product. All have batch numbers, then we PGI the stock to 'SC stock' via 541 movement type.
Then Vendor will finish the end product and send us back the end product.
We consumption the components use 543 O movement type? And GR the end product..
So while goods receipt, the sytem just need pick the existing batch number for both components and finish products..
Where are the issues???
Thanks.

Hoo Laa wrote:
I have questions for people always mentioning there are issues with batch determination while post goods receipt for subcontracting orders.
>
> I am thinking maybe they didnt active the batch determination for 543 movement type..
>
> Thanks.
Hi Hoo,
You are right!!
Setting of batch number determination has its importance in Mvt Type be it 541, 543....
The issue you might have observed would be with Batch Determination in Goods Issues which folks find it bit tough to achieve n make it work for them.
Cheers!!
Shiva

Auto print of Goods Issue/Transfer Posting Documents by Movement type

Hi,
We have created two different output types to print the layout's of Goods Issue/Transfer Posting Documents.
The requirement is to default the message in the document by movement type (key combination)
Meaning if it is 201 it should populate GI output type
If it is 313 it should populate TP output type.
we do not have any standard key combination (NACR) by movement type wise.
Any alternative way of meeting this requirement?
Thanks
Regards
Ram

Hello Kevin,
I donu2019t think it is necessary to use a user exit to keep the Material B (that is transferred from Material A) in the same bin.
This can be controlled in the customizing: indicator Post to same bin, that can be set in the WM Movement type (V_T333-KZUAP) and in the Storage type (V_T3010-KZUAP).
Now I donu2019t know your business process but I am surprised that Material B requires more space than Material A since it is u2018bornu2019 by means of a transfer posting and not a production or packing step that makes it bigger in terms of capacity required.
A workaround for this could be to transfer (LT10) Material A first to a separate Storage type (with the Post to same bin-flag set) that has no Capacity check and after the 309 posting transfer it back into the warehouse with LT10.
Success and thanks beforehand for any credits!
Kind regards,
Bart

Issue in Posting of Vendor Invoice

Hi
I am having an issue in posting of vendor invoice. In simulation mode, the system is showing the correct calculation of TDS amounts. but when I am trying to post the Invoice , the TDS entries created by the system are deleted and system gives:
Error Message - The excise year could not be determined for generating the numbers for TDS certificates. The number range is linked to the Excise Year and not on the financial year directly.
Procedure - Check the customising done for the company code in the India version IMG. Maintain the start month for the excise year correctly.
There is no error for other company codes in the system and this happens for only one company code.
Under the India version for extended with holding tax , we have maintained the withholding tax number group and SAP Script forms , assigned number range to number groups and maintained number ranges for the company code.
Pls suggest
Regards
Sanil Bhandari
TDS Certificates. The number ra
on the financial year directly

Hi,
Just check if in the Withholding tax Type configuration - The Withholding tax certificate check box is checked. Just read the help for what is the implication of ticking that checkbox. This may be the problem.
Cheers
V.Krishnan
(assign points if useful)

Purchase order message Re-determination after goods issue is posted

We have a requirement to trigger special function message type (which creates a flat file) in a purchase order when goods issue for all items are posted. We have created a requirement routine for message type to check if goods issue is posted for all line items. Goods issue is posted using BAPI which uses transaction MIGO. When goods issue is posted, we want output to be triggered in purchase order. Requirement is working fine but is there any way to trigger output automatically without going to PO?
After goods issue is posted, if we go into purchase order using ME22N then we see output proposed or if we make any changes in PO then output is proposed. This will not happen in real life though.
Any suggestion will be highly appreciated. Thanks.
Sanjay

Hello,
You can create a new output message record in NAST using RV_MESSAGE_UPDATE:
CALL FUNCTION 'RV_MESSAGE_UPDATE'
      EXPORTING
        msg_kappl = 'EF'
        msg_objky = w_objky
      TABLES
        msg_xnast = itab_nast
        msg_ynast = itab_nast_old
      EXCEPTIONS
        no_update = 1
        OTHERS    = 2.
Once the record is created, you may submit the program RSNAST00 to output the message.
Thanks,
Venu

Issue Tracking Posting Level

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for