Issue When Creating a Database View

Hi
       I am trying two join two tables using a database view through SE11 and this tables are related to SAP HR.
      As per the requirement we need to create a table join using SQVI in which we are facing a issue where the transaction is freezed as as we create a
      Table join using SQVI.
      So..
      Is their any alternative method to join two tables in HR ABAP apart from SQVI.
      When I try to create a DATBASE VIEW in SE11 it says no relation exists even there is one primary key in both the tables.
      Can we do this using SE11 or is there any other way two join these tables or infotypes..for ex how we join p0008 and p0002
      I am new to this pls help me.(Sry for posting ths in ABAP DEV)..

Hi,
there is a difference between database tables and structures. Structures do no exist in the database, they are just a grouping of fields in ABAP dictionary. P0002 ans P0008 are structures that do not contain any data by definition.
You can create SQVI quick view or database view using database tables PA0002 and PA0008.
Check if all join conditions can be used in your case, you may change or delete join conditions using right-mouse-click.
Regards
Clemens

Similar Messages

Performance issues when creating a Report / Query in Discoverer

Hi forum,
Hope you are can help, it involves a performance issues when creating a Report / Query.
I have a Discoverer Report that currently takes less than 5 seconds to run. After I add a condition to bring back Batch Status that = Posted we cancelled the query after reaching 20 minutes as this is way too long. If I remove the condition the query time goes back to less than 5 seconds.
Please see attached the SQL Inspector Plan:
Before Condition
SELECT STATEMENT
SORT GROUP BY
VIEW SYS
SORT GROUP BY
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS
AND-EQUAL
INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS_N2
INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS_N1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES
INDEX RANGE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_N1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_SETS
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_SETS_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_TL
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_TL_U1
INDEX RANGE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_NORM_HIER_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_LINES
INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_JE_LINES_N1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_HEADERS
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_DAILY_CONVERSION_TYPES_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_SOURCES_TL
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_SOURCES_TL_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_CATEGORIES_TL_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_BATCHES_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_BUDGET_VERSIONS_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_ENCUMBRANCE_TYPES_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_BATCHES
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_BATCHES_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_BATCHES_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_PERIODS
INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_PERIODS_U1
After Condition
SELECT STATEMENT
SORT GROUP BY
VIEW SYS
SORT GROUP BY
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS
NESTED LOOPS OUTER
NESTED LOOPS
TABLE ACCESS FULL GL.GL_JE_BATCHES
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_BATCHES_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_HEADERS
INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_N1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_ENCUMBRANCE_TYPES_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_DAILY_CONVERSION_TYPES_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_BUDGET_VERSIONS_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_SOURCES_TL
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_SOURCES_TL_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_CATEGORIES_TL_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_BATCHES_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_JE_LINES
INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_JE_LINES_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_CODE_COMBINATIONS_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID GL.GL_PERIODS
INDEX RANGE SCAN GL.GL_PERIODS_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES
INDEX RANGE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_N1
INDEX RANGE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_NORM_HIER_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_TL
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUES_TL_U1
TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_SETS
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN APPLSYS.FND_FLEX_VALUE_SETS_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
INDEX UNIQUE SCAN GL.GL_JE_HEADERS_U1
Is there anything i can do in Discoverer Desktop / Administration to avoid this problem.
Many thanks,
Lance

Hi Rod,
I've tried the condition (Batch Status||'' = 'Posted') as you suggested, but the qeury time is still over 20 mins. To test i changed it to (Batch Status||'' = 'Unposted') and the query was returned within seconds again.
Ive been doing some more digging and have found the database view that is linked to the Journal Batches folder. See below.
I think the problem is with the column using DECODE. When querying the column in TOAD the value of P is returned. But in discoverer the condition is done on the value Posted. Im not too sure how DECODE works, but think this could be the causing some sort of issue with Full Table Scans. How do we get around this?
Lance
DECODE( JOURNAL_BATCH1.STATUS,
'+', 'Unable to validate or create CTA',
'+*', 'Was unable to validate or create CTA',
'-','Invalid or inactive rounding differences account in journal entry',
'-*', 'Modified invalid or inactive rounding differences account in journal entry',
'<', 'Showing sequence assignment failure',
'<*', 'Was showing sequence assignment failure',
'>', 'Showing cutoff rule violation',
'>*', 'Was showing cutoff rule violation',
'A', 'Journal batch failed funds reservation',
'A*', 'Journal batch previously failed funds reservation',
'AU', 'Showing batch with unopened period',
'B', 'Showing batch control total violation',
'B*', 'Was showing batch control total violation',
'BF', 'Showing batch with frozen or inactive budget',
'BU', 'Showing batch with unopened budget year',
'C', 'Showing unopened reporting period',
'C*', 'Was showing unopened reporting period',
'D', 'Selected for posting to an unopened period',
'D*', 'Was selected for posting to an unopened period',
'E', 'Showing no journal entries for this batch',
'E*', 'Was showing no journal entries for this batch',
'EU', 'Showing batch with unopened encumbrance year',
'F', 'Showing unopened reporting encumbrance year',
'F*', 'Was showing unopened reporting encumbrance year',
'G', 'Showing journal entry with invalid or inactive suspense account',
'G*', 'Was showing journal entry with invalid or inactive suspense account',
'H', 'Showing encumbrance journal entry with invalid or inactive reserve account',
'H*', 'Was showing encumbrance journal entry with invalid or inactive reserve account',
'I', 'In the process of being posted',
'J', 'Showing journal control total violation',
'J*', 'Was showing journal control total violation',
'K', 'Showing unbalanced intercompany journal entry',
'K*', 'Was showing unbalanced intercompany journal entry',
'L', 'Showing unbalanced journal entry by account category',
'L*', 'Was showing unbalanced journal entry by account category',
'M', 'Showing multiple problems preventing posting of batch',
'M*', 'Was showing multiple problems preventing posting of batch',
'N', 'Journal produced error during intercompany balance processing',
'N*', 'Journal produced error during intercompany balance processing',
'O', 'Unable to convert amounts into reporting currency',
'O*', 'Was unable to convert amounts into reporting currency',
'P', 'Posted',
'Q', 'Showing untaxed journal entry',
'Q*', 'Was showing untaxed journal entry',
'R', 'Showing unbalanced encumbrance entry without reserve account',
'R*', 'Was showing unbalanced encumbrance entry without reserve account',
'S', 'Already selected for posting',
'T', 'Showing invalid period and conversion information for this batch',
'T*', 'Was showing invalid period and conversion information for this batch',
'U', 'Unposted',
'V', 'Journal batch is unapproved',
'V*', 'Journal batch was unapproved',
'W', 'Showing an encumbrance journal entry with no encumbrance type',
'W*', 'Was showing an encumbrance journal entry with no encumbrance type',
'X', 'Showing an unbalanced journal entry but suspense not allowed',
'X*', 'Was showing an unbalanced journal entry but suspense not allowed',
'Z', 'Showing invalid journal entry lines or no journal entry lines',
'Z*', 'Was showing invalid journal entry lines or no journal entry lines', NULL ),

SSMS crash when creating new database diagram

For several years I have been unable to create database diagrams from within SSMS. I have tried every combination of VS2005, VS2008, VS2012 and VS2013 with every combination of SQL2005, SQL2008, SQL2012 and SQL2014.
I have installed, uninstalled, and repaired many dozens of times. I am currently using VS2013 ultimate with SQL2014 express.
I have tried every related 'workaround' that I can find on the internet. Still the problem persists.
Any help would be deeply appreciated.
Here are the relevant details with file versions:
In SSMS, I right-click on a database and choose New Database Diagram. A Blank diagram window appears with the SSMS error dialog:
===================================
Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt. (Microsoft.VisualStudio.OLE.Interop)
Program Location:
   at Microsoft.VisualStudio.OLE.Interop.IOleCommandTarget.QueryStatus(Guid& pguidCmdGroup, UInt32 cCmds, OLECMD[] prgCmds, IntPtr pCmdText)
   at Microsoft.VisualStudio.Platform.WindowManagement.DocumentObjectSite.QueryStatus(Guid& pguidCmdGroup, UInt32 cCmds, OLECMD[] prgCmds, IntPtr pCmdText)
   at Microsoft.VisualStudio.Platform.WindowManagement.WindowFrame.QueryStatus(Guid& pguidCmdGroup, UInt32 cCmds, OLECMD[] prgCmds, IntPtr pCmdText)
   at Microsoft.Internal.VisualStudio.Shell.Interop.IVsTrackSelectionExPrivate.Register()
   at Microsoft.VisualStudio.Platform.WindowManagement.WindowFrame.ConnectSelectionContext()
   at Microsoft.VisualStudio.Platform.WindowManagement.WindowFrame.Activate()
   at Microsoft.VisualStudio.Platform.WindowManagement.WindowManagerService.viewManager_ActiveViewChanged(Object sender, ActiveViewChangedEventArgs e)
   at System.EventHandler`1.Invoke(Object sender, TEventArgs e)
   at Microsoft.VisualStudio.PlatformUI.ExtensionMethods.RaiseEvent[TEventArgs](EventHandler`1 eventHandler, Object source, TEventArgs args)
   at Microsoft.VisualStudio.PlatformUI.Shell.ViewManager.SetActiveView(View view, ActivationType type)
   at Microsoft.VisualStudio.Platform.WindowManagement.WindowFrame.ShowInternal(ShowFlags showFlags)
   at Microsoft.VisualStudio.Platform.WindowManagement.WindowFrame.<Show>b__26()
   at Microsoft.VisualStudio.ErrorHandler.CallWithCOMConvention(Func`1 method)
   at Microsoft.VisualStudio.Platform.WindowManagement.WindowFrame.Show()
   at Microsoft.VisualStudio.Platform.WindowManagement.WindowFrame.MarshalingWindowFrame.<Microsoft.VisualStudio.Shell.Interop.IVsWindowFrame.Show>b__7a()
   at Microsoft.VisualStudio.Shell.ThreadHelper.Invoke[TResult](Func`1 method)
   at Microsoft.VisualStudio.Platform.WindowManagement.WindowFrame.MarshalingWindowFrame.Microsoft.VisualStudio.Shell.Interop.IVsWindowFrame.Show()
   at Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.UI.VSIntegration.Editors.VirtualProject.CreateDesigner(Urn origUrn, DocumentType editorType, DocumentOptions aeOptions, IManagedConnection con, String fileName)
   at Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.UI.VSIntegration.Editors.VirtualProject.Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.UI.VSIntegration.Editors.ISqlVirtualProject.CreateDesigner(Urn origUrn, DocumentType editorType, DocumentOptions aeOptions, IManagedConnection
con, String fileName)
   at Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.UI.VSIntegration.Editors.ISqlVirtualProject.CreateDesigner(Urn origUrn, DocumentType editorType, DocumentOptions aeOptions, IManagedConnection con, String fileName)
   at Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.UI.VSIntegration.Editors.VsDocumentMenuItem.CreateDesignerWindow(IManagedConnection mc, DocumentOptions options)
   at Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.UI.VSIntegration.Editors.VsDocumentMenuItem.InvokeDesigner(IManagedConnection connection)
   at Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.UI.VSIntegration.Editors.VsDocumentMenuItem.Invoke()
   at Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.UI.VSIntegration.ObjectExplorer.ToolsMenuItemBase.MenuInvokedHandler(Object sender, EventArgs args)
Version info taken from Sql Server Management Studio/Help/About dialog:
Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio      12.0.2000.8
Microsoft Analysis Services Client Tools    12.0.2000.8
Microsoft Data Access Components (MDAC)     6.1.7601.17514
Microsoft MSXML                             3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0
Microsoft Internet Explorer                 9.11.9600.17358
Microsoft .NET Framework                    4.0.30319.18444
Operating System                            6.1.7601
DLL versions
c:\Program Files(x86)\Common Files\microsoft shared\Visual Database Tools
dsref80.dll version 12.0.21005.1
c:\Program Files(x86)\Common Files\microsoft shared\MSDesigners8
msdds.dll    12.0.21005.1
msddsf.dll   12.0.21005.1
msddslm.dll 12.0.21005.1
msdds.mp.dll 12.0.21005.1
msddsp.dll   12.0.21005.1
c:\Program Files(x86)\Common Files\microsoft shared\MSDesigners8\Resources\1033
msddsui.dll 12.0.21005.1

Hello,
There is a Connect item related to this issue. This is the link of that Connect item:
https://connect.microsoft.com/SQLServer/feedback/details/730985/smss-crashes-when-creating-new-database-diagram
Try the workarounds posted there (Workarounds section).
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Alberto Morillo
SQLCoffee.com

Bad performance when using complex database view with Toplink

Hi
Problem description
1. I have a complex query that collects the data from many DB tables. For this reason I create a database view based on this select. Using EJB 3.0 with Toplink I
mapped this view to a java object the same way I map database tables. The method I use to get the results is:
snippet code...
public List<VwKartela> VwKartela(Integer pperid) {
List<VwKartela> results = null;
Session session = getSessionFactory().acquireSession();
ExpressionBuilder bankfile = new ExpressionBuilder();
Expression exp1 = bankfile.get("perid").equal(pperid);
ReadAllQuery query = new ReadAllQuery();
query.setReferenceClass(VwKartela.class);
query.setSelectionCriteria(exp1);
results =(List<VwKartela>)session.executeQuery(query);
When running the select on the view prom SQL Plus I haven’t any performance problem.
2.Question: How can I improve the performance? I referenced to Toplink docs but I didn't improve the it.
Have anyone any experience is such cases?
Thank you
Thanos

Hi
After my last tests I conclude at the followings:
The query returns 1-30 records
Test 1: Using Form Builder
- Execution time 7-8 seconds
Test 2: Using Jdeveloper/Toplink/EJB 3.0/ADF and Oracle AS 10.1.3.0
- Execution time 25-27 seconds
Test 3: Using JDBC/ADF and Oracle AS 10.1.3.0
- Execution time 17-18 seconds
When I use:
session.setLogLevel(SessionLog.FINE) and
session.setProfiler(new PerformanceProfiler())
I don’t see any improvement in the execution time of the query.
Thank you
Thanos

BUGREPORT: Timestamp issue when creating new url mappings

We have come accross and issue when adding multiple databases and subsiqent url mappings.
the issue presented in the log is
####<Nov 16, 2012 10:49:52 AM CST> <Error> <HTTP> <adeoraapp03.santos.com> <WLS_APEX> <[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default (self-tuning)'> <<WLS Kernel>> <> <> <1353025192413> <BEA-101020> <[ServletContext@955221946[app:apex module:apex.war path:/apex spec-version:2.5]] Servlet failed with Exception
java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Not a correctly formatted timestamp: 2012-11-15T23:52:58.0080Z
     at oracle.dbtools.common.util.Timestamps.valueOf(Timestamps.java:61)
     at oracle.dbtools.common.config.db.UrlMappings$Builder$1PoolFilter.startElement(UrlMappings.java:199)
     at oracle.dbtools.common.x3p.MatchFilter.startElement(MatchFilter.java:54)
     at oracle.dbtools.common.x3p.impl.Event.invoke(Event.java:52)
     at oracle.dbtools.common.x3p.impl.Chain$EventIterator.advance(Chain.java:125)
     at oracle.dbtools.common.x3p.impl.Chain$EventIterator.advance(Chain.java:79)
     at oracle.dbtools.common.util.AbstractIterator.next(AbstractIterator.java:28)
     at oracle.dbtools.common.x3p.impl.X3PReaderAdaptor.next(X3PReaderAdaptor.java:34)
     at oracle.dbtools.common.config.db.UrlMappings$Builder.read(UrlMappings.java:170)
     at oracle.dbtools.common.config.db.UrlMappings.existing(UrlMappings.java:99)
     at oracle.dbtools.common.config.db.UrlMappings.urlMappings(UrlMappings.java:93)
     at oracle.dbtools.common.config.db.DatabasePoolConfig.loadFromXML(DatabasePoolConfig.java:285)
     at oracle.dbtools.common.config.db.DatabasePoolConfig.loadFromDBFromTime(DatabasePoolConfig.java:181)
     at oracle.dbtools.common.config.db.DatabasePoolConfig.getPoolInfo(DatabasePoolConfig.java:54)
     at oracle.dbtools.rt.jdbc.DatabaseConnectionFilter.poolInfo(DatabaseConnectionFilter.java:60)
     at oracle.dbtools.rt.jdbc.DatabaseConnectionFilter.applyDatabaseConnectionInfo(DatabaseConnectionFilter.java:71)
     at oracle.dbtools.rt.web.HttpEndpointBase.service(HttpEndpointBase.java:119)
     at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:820)
     at weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper$ServletServiceAction.run(StubSecurityHelper.java:227)
     at weblogic.servlet.internal.StubSecurityHelper.invokeServlet(StubSecurityHelper.java:125)
     at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.execute(ServletStubImpl.java:301)
     at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletStubImpl.execute(ServletStubImpl.java:184)
     at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.wrapRun(WebAppServletContext.java:3732)
     at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext$ServletInvocationAction.run(WebAppServletContext.java:3696)
     at weblogic.security.acl.internal.AuthenticatedSubject.doAs(AuthenticatedSubject.java:321)
     at weblogic.security.service.SecurityManager.runAs(SecurityManager.java:120)
     at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.securedExecute(WebAppServletContext.java:2273)
     at weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext.execute(WebAppServletContext.java:2179)
     at weblogic.servlet.internal.ServletRequestImpl.run(ServletRequestImpl.java:1490)
     at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:256)
     at weblogic.work.ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:221)
>
This seems to be due to a time format issue when adding new database mapping in the url-mappings
when running the following command
@:as11g_pfrd_prod> java -jar apex.war map-url --type base-path /apexpoc apexpoc
Nov 16, 2012 10:22:57 AM oracle.dbtools.common.config.file.ConfigurationFolder logConfigFolder
INFO: Using configuration folder: /data1/software/oracle/product/as11g_pfrd_prod/user_projects/domains/PFRD_Domain/servers/WLS_APEX/apex_config/apex
@:as11g_pfrd_prod> pwd
/data1/software/oracle/product/as11g_pfrd_prod/user_projects/domains/PFRD_Domain/servers/WLS_APEX/stage/apex
After running the command the following entry was added to url mappings file
This resulted in the following entries in url-mapping.xml, (the timestamps are in to be in UTC):
<pool base-path="/apexpoc" name="apexpoc" updated="2012-11-15T23:52:58.0080Z"/>
Which caused the above stack trace and also caused a internal error 500 on the browser when trying to access APEX
we removed the url mapping and ran the following command(at a different time in the day)
@:as11g_pfrd_prod> pwd
/data1/software/oracle/product/as11g_pfrd_prod/user_projects/domains/PFRD_Domain/servers/WLS_APEX/stage/apex
@:as11g_pfrd_prod> java -jar apex.war map-url --type base-path /apexpoc apexpoc
Nov 16, 2012 10:58:35 AM oracle.dbtools.common.config.file.ConfigurationFolder logConfigFolder
INFO: Using configuration folder: /data1/software/oracle/product/as11g_pfrd_prod/user_projects/domains/PFRD_Domain/servers/WLS_APEX/apex_config/apex
which resulted in a new entry in the url mappings table
<pool base-path="/apexpoc" name="apexpoc" updated="2012-11-16T00:28:35.479Z"/>
And the apex listener worked again

Thanks Colm,
Was this a known issue? If so do we have a common "thread" for known issues?
And do we have any idea when 2.0 Final is coming out?

Request time out when creating content database

Hello,
my problem is, that i cannot create a SharePoint content database via the central administration.
My Setup is the following:
SharePoint Server 2013 Enterprise Farm
1x Applikation Server/WFE (Windows Server 2012 SP 1)
1x Database Server MSSQL Server 2012 (Windows Server 2012 SP 1)
1x TFS 2013 (Windows Server 2012 SP 1)
all of them are hosted in the same Hyper-V Environment. It is not the fasted Hyper-V Environment existing on planet earth.
The weirdest part of the problem is, i am able to create a content database via powershell.
I am running in some kind of time out issue related to the IIS and CA of that Applikation Server.
Here is the ULS Log from the failling content database creation via CA
12.18.2014 10:26:09.47 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring b4ly
High Leaving Monitored Scope (PostAuthenticateRequestHandler). Execution Time=8,5997
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:26:09.66 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
General g3qj
High [Forced due to logging gap, cached @ 12/18/2014 10:26:09.50, Original Level: Verbose] url is in site
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:26:09.66 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Asp Runtime aj1kp
High [Forced due to logging gap, Original Level: Verbose] SPRequestModule.PreSendRequestHeaders
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:26:09.73 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Database ahjqp
High [Forced due to logging gap, cached @ 12/18/2014 10:26:09.70, Original Level: Verbose] SQL connection time: 14.765 for Data Source=SQLSERVER\DATABASE;Initial Catalog=master;Integrated Security=True;Pooling=False
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:26:09.73 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Topology 8xqz
High [Forced due to logging gap, Original Level: Medium] Updating SPPersistedObject {0}. Version: {1} Ensure: {2}, HashCode: {3}, Id: {4}, Stack: {5}
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:26:09.77 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Upgrade aj2jl
High 12/18/2014 10:26:09.77 w3wp (0x2304) 0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade ServerSequence aj2jl DEBUG Search ServerSequence returns TargetBuildVersion '15.0.4675.1000' 4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:26:09.77 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Upgrade aj2jk
High 12/18/2014 10:26:09.77 w3wp (0x2304) 0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade ServerSequence aj2jk DEBUG Setting Search ServerSequence version (guid '53d65723-a256-48d7-a477-1d3466089eef') to BuildVersion '15.0.4675.1000'
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025 4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:26:09.77 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Upgrade aj2jl
High 12/18/2014 10:26:09.77 w3wp (0x2304) 0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade ServerSequence aj2jl DEBUG Search ServerSequence returns TargetBuildVersion '15.0.4675.1000' 4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:26:09.83 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Database 8acb
High [Forced due to logging gap, cached @ 12/18/2014 10:26:09.81, Original Level: VerboseEx] Reverting to process identity
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:26:09.83 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Database ahjqp
High [Forced due to logging gap, Original Level: Verbose] SQL connection time: 0.2565 for Data Source=SQLSERVER\DATABASE;Initial Catalog=SharePoint_2013_Prod_Config;Integrated Security=True;Enlist=False;Pooling=True;Min
Pool Size=0;Max Pool Size=100;Connect Timeout=400
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:26:12.16 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Database ahjqp
High [Forced due to logging gap, cached @ 12/18/2014 10:26:09.86, Original Level: Verbose] SQL connection time: 0.1719 for Data Source=SQLSERVER\DATABASE;Initial Catalog=SharePoint_2013_Prod_Config;Integrated Security=True;Enlist=False;Pooling=True;Min
Pool Size=0;Max Pool Size=100;Connect Timeout=400
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:26:12.16 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Database 8acb
High [Forced due to logging gap, Original Level: VerboseEx] Reverting to process identity
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:26:12.19 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Topology 84y4
High Granting VIEW SERVER STATE permission for S-1-5-21-3747686279-3738247048-1854932723-1131.
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:26:12.23 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Topology 84y5
High VIEW SERVER STATE permission updated successfully.
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:26:12.23 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Topology 84y4
High Granting CONTROL SERVER permission for S-1-5-21-3747686279-3738247048-1854932723-1131.
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:26:12.25 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Topology 84y5
High CONTROL SERVER permission updated successfully.
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:26:12.33 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Database 8acb
High [Forced due to logging gap, cached @ 12/18/2014 10:26:12.30, Original Level: VerboseEx] Reverting to process identity
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:26:12.33 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Database ahjqp
High [Forced due to logging gap, Original Level: Verbose] SQL connection time: 16.4685 for Data Source=SQLSERVER\DATABASE;Initial Catalog=master;Integrated Security=True;Enlist=False;Pooling=False;Min Pool Size=0;Max
Pool Size=100;Connect Timeout=400 4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:26:12.39 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Database 8acb
High [Forced due to logging gap, cached @ 12/18/2014 10:26:12.38, Original Level: VerboseEx] Reverting to process identity
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:26:12.39 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Database ahjqp
High [Forced due to logging gap, Original Level: Verbose] SQL connection time: 11.6743 for Data Source=SQLSERVER\DATABASE;Initial Catalog=master;Integrated Security=True;Enlist=False;Pooling=False;Min Pool Size=0;Max
Pool Size=100;Connect Timeout=400 4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:26:12.42 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Database 7t6o
High The WSS_Content_uitest database does not exist. It will now be created.
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:26:15.11 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Database ahjqp
High [Forced due to logging gap, cached @ 12/18/2014 10:26:12.44, Original Level: Verbose] SQL connection time: 9.9785 for Data Source=SQLSERVER\DATABASE;Initial Catalog=master;Integrated Security=True;Enlist=False;Pooling=False;Min
Pool Size=0;Max Pool Size=100;Connect Timeout=400
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:26:15.11 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Database ab20s
High [Forced due to logging gap, Original Level: Medium] Setting the {0} option to {1} on the database {2}.
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:26:15.14 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Upgrade ajy0d
High 12/18/2014 10:26:15.14 w3wp (0x2304) 0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPUtility ajy0d DEBUG File C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Web Server Extensions\15\Template\sql\store.sql, Time out =
0 sec 4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:28:07.46 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Database ahjqp
High [Forced due to logging gap, cached @ 12/18/2014 10:26:15.16, Original Level: Verbose] SQL connection time: 11.4389 for Data Source=SQLSERVER\DATABASE;Initial Catalog=WSS_Content_uitest;Integrated Security=True;Enlist=False;Pooling=False;Min
Pool Size=0;Max Pool Size=100;Connect Timeout=400
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:28:07.46 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Database fa45
High System.Threading.ThreadAbortException: Thread was being aborted. at SNIReadSyncOverAsync(SNI_ConnWrapper* , SNI_Packet** , Int32 ) at SNINativeMethodWrapper.SNIReadSyncOverAsync(SafeHandle
pConn, IntPtr& packet, Int32 timeout) at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParserStateObject.ReadSniSyncOverAsync() at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParserStateObject.TryReadNetworkPacket() at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParserStateObject.TryPrepareBuffer()
at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParserStateObject.TryReadByte(Byte& value) at System.Data.SqlClient.TdsParser.TryRun(RunBehavior runBehavior, SqlCommand cmdHandler, SqlDataReader dataStream, BulkCopySimpleResultSet bulkCopyHandler,
TdsParserStateObject stateObj, Boolean& dataReady) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.RunExecuteNonQueryTds(String methodName, Boolean async, Int32 timeout, Boolean asyncWrite) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.InternalExecuteNonQuery(TaskCompletionSource`1
completion, String methodName, Boolean sendToPipe, Int32 timeout, Boolean asyncWrite) at System.Data.SqlClient.SqlCommand.ExecuteNonQuery() at Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities.SqlSession.ExecuteScript(TextReader textReader, Int32
commandTimeout) 4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:28:07.47 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Database fa46
High at Microsoft.SharePoint.Utilities.SqlSession.ExecuteScript(String path, Int32 commandTimeout) at Microsoft.SharePoint.Upgrade.SPUtility.ExecuteSqlFile(SqlSession sqlSession, ISqlSession isqlSession,
SqlFile sqlFileId, Int32 timeOut) at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPDatabase.Provision(SPDatabase database, SqlConnectionStringBuilder connectionString, SqlFile sqlFileId, Dictionary`2 options) at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPContentDatabase.Provision()
at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPContentDatabaseCollection.Add(SPContentDatabase database, Boolean provision, Guid webApplicationLockId, Int32 addFlags) at Microsoft.SharePoint.Administration.SPContentDatabaseCollection.Add(Guid
newDatabaseId, String strDatabaseServer, String strDatabaseName, String strDatabaseUsername, String strDatabasePassword, Int32 warningSiteCount, Int32 maximumSiteCount, Int32 status, Boolean provision, Guid lockId, Int32 addFlags) at Microsoft.SharePoint.ApplicationPages.NewContentDBPage.BtnSubmit_Click(Object
sender, EventArgs e) at System.Web.UI.WebControls.Button.RaisePostBackEvent(String eventArgument) at System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequestMain(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint)
at System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest(Boolean includeStagesBeforeAsyncPoint, Boolean includeStagesAfterAsyncPoint) at System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest() at System.Web.UI.Page.ProcessRequest(HttpContext context) at
System.Web.HttpApplication.CallHandlerExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute() at System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously) at System.Web.HttpApplication.PipelineStepManager.ResumeSteps(Exception
error) at System.Web.HttpApplication.BeginProcessRequestNotification(HttpContext context, AsyncCallback cb) at System.Web.HttpRuntime.ProcessRequestNotificationPrivate(IIS7WorkerRequest wr, HttpContext context) at
System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotificationHelper(IntPtr rootedObjectsPointer, IntPtr nativeRequestContext, IntPtr moduleData, Int32 flags) at System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotification(IntPtr rootedObjectsPointer,
IntPtr nativeRequestContext, IntPtr moduleData, Int32 flags) at System.Web.Hosting.UnsafeIISMethods.MgdIndicateCompletion(IntPtr pHandler, RequestNotificationStatus& notificationStatus) at System.Web.Hosting.UnsafeIISMethods.MgdIndicateCompletion(IntPtr
pHandler, RequestNotificationStatus& notificationStatus) at System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotificationHelper(IntPtr rootedObjectsPointer, IntPtr nativeRequestContext, IntPtr moduleData, Int32 flags) at System.Web.Hosting.PipelineRuntime.ProcessRequestNotification(IntPtr
rootedObjectsPointer, IntPtr nativeRequestContext, IntPtr moduleData, Int32 flags)
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:28:07.47 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Database tzku
High ConnectionString: 'Data Source=SQLSERVER\DATABASE;Initial Catalog=WSS_Content_uitest;Integrated Security=True;Enlist=False;Pooling=False;Min Pool Size=0;Max Pool Size=100;Connect Timeout=400' Partition:
NULL ConnectionState: Closed ConnectionTimeout: 400
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:28:07.50 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Database tzkv
High SqlCommand: '--FixO15:3174405 create role SPReadOnly This line should not be changed or removed, otherwise upgrade would fail. IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT * FROM sys.database_principals WHERE name = N'SPReadOnly'
AND type = 'R') CREATE ROLE [SPReadOnly] DECLARE @objname sysname, @objtype NVARCHAR(max), @datatype NVARCHAR(max), @query NVARCHAR(max) -- Grant SELECT on all SharePoint stored procedures and functions DECLARE c CURSOR LOCAL FAST_FORWARD
FOR SELECT ROUTINE_NAME, ROUTINE_TYPE, DATA_TYPE FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.ROUTINES WHERE ROUTINE_SCHEMA = 'DBO' OPEN c WHILE 1 = 1 BEGIN FETCH NEXT FROM c INTO
@objname, @objtype, @datatype IF @@FETCH_STATUS = -1 BREAK IF @@FETCH_STATUS = 0 BEGIN -- Inline table-valued functions
IF (@objtype = 'FUNCTION' AND @datatype = 'TABLE') SET @query = 'GRANT SELECT ON [dbo].' + quotename(@objname) + ' TO [SPReadOnly]' EXEC sp_executesql
@query END END CLOSE c DEALLOCATE c -- Grant SELECT on all SharePoint tables DECLARE c CURSOR LOCAL FAST_FORWARD FOR SELECT TABLE_NAME FROM INFORMATION_SCHEMA.TABLES
WHERE TABLE_SCHEMA = 'DBO' OPEN c WHILE 1 = 1 BEGIN FETCH NEXT FROM c INTO @objname IF @@FETCH_STATUS = -1 BREAK IF @@FETCH_STATUS
= 0 BEGIN SET @query = 'GRANT SELECT ON [dbo].' + quotename(@objname) + ' TO [SPReadOnly]' EXEC sp_executesql @query END END CLOSE
c DEALLOCATE c -- Grant EXECUTE on User-defined type where schema is dbo DECLARE c CURSOR LOCAL FAST_FORWARD FOR SELECT NAME FROM SYS.TYPES WHERE IS_USER_DEFINED = 1
AND SCHEMA_ID = schema_id(N'dbo') OPEN c WHILE 1 = 1 BEGIN FETCH NEXT FROM c INTO @objname IF @@FETCH_STATUS = -1 BREAK IF @@FETCH_STATUS
= 0 BEGIN SET @query = 'GRANT EXECUTE ON TYPE::[dbo].' + quotename(@objname) + ' TO [SPReadOnly]' EXEC sp_executesql @query END END CLOSE
c DEALLOCATE c ' CommandType: Text CommandTimeout: 0
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:28:07.50 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Database aek90
High SecurityOnOperationCheck = False
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:28:07.50 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring b4ly
High Leaving Monitored Scope (Database.Provision (WSS_Content_uitest on SQLSErver\database)). Execution Time=115148.4664
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:28:07.50 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Topology 8dyx
High Deleting the SPPersistedObject, SPContentDatabase Name=WSS_Content_uitest.
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:28:07.56 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Topology bw4w
High [Forced due to logging gap, cached @ 12/18/2014 10:28:07.53, Original Level: Medium] {0}
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:28:07.56 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Database 8acb
High [Forced due to logging gap, Original Level: VerboseEx] Reverting to process identity
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:28:07.60 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring b4ly
High Leaving Monitored Scope (Creating Content Database (WSS_Content_uitest on SQLServer\Database)). Execution Time=115311.5636
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:28:07.64 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Runtime tkau
Unexpected System.Web.HttpException: Request timed out.
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:28:07.64 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
General ajlz0
High Getting Error Message for Exception System.Web.HttpException (0x80004005): Request timed out.
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
12.18.2014 10:28:07.69 w3wp.exe (0x2304)
0x1B40 SharePoint Foundation
Micro Trace uls4
High Micro Trace Tags: 0 b4ly,301 aj2jl,3 aj2jk,0 aj2jl,2423 84y4,35 84y5,4 84y4,11 84y5,181 7t6o,2714 ajy0d,112321 fa45,10 fa46,3 tzku,23 tzkv,0 aek90,0 b4ly,6 8dyx,91 b4ly,38 tkau,13 ajlz0
4deed69c-2f53-a086-14bb-cbf40b020025
The working content database creation from powershell looks like this
12.18.2014 09:45:37.52 PowerShell.exe (0x2058)
0x1E28 SharePoint Foundation
Upgrade aj2jl
High 12/18/2014 09:45:37.52 powershell (0x2058) 0x1E28 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade ServerSequence aj2jl DEBUG Search ServerSequence returns TargetBuildVersion '15.0.4675.1000' 43dae8a1-02e3-43f5-8a06-0417221e6385
43dae8a1-02e3-43f5-8a06-0417221e6385
12.18.2014 09:45:37.52 PowerShell.exe (0x2058)
0x1E28 SharePoint Foundation
Upgrade aj2jk
High 12/18/2014 09:45:37.52 powershell (0x2058) 0x1E28 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade ServerSequence aj2jk DEBUG Setting Search ServerSequence version (guid '53d65723-a256-48d7-a477-1d3466089eef') to BuildVersion '15.0.4675.1000'
43dae8a1-02e3-43f5-8a06-0417221e6385 43dae8a1-02e3-43f5-8a06-0417221e6385
12.18.2014 09:45:37.52 PowerShell.exe (0x2058)
0x1E28 SharePoint Foundation
Upgrade aj2jl
High 12/18/2014 09:45:37.52 powershell (0x2058) 0x1E28 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade ServerSequence aj2jl DEBUG Search ServerSequence returns TargetBuildVersion '15.0.4675.1000' 43dae8a1-02e3-43f5-8a06-0417221e6385
43dae8a1-02e3-43f5-8a06-0417221e6385
12.18.2014 09:45:39.98 PowerShell.exe (0x2058)
0x1E28 SharePoint Foundation
Topology 84y4
High Granting VIEW SERVER STATE permission for S-1-5-21-3747686279-3738247048-1854932723-1131.
43dae8a1-02e3-43f5-8a06-0417221e6385
12.18.2014 09:45:40.02 PowerShell.exe (0x2058)
0x1E28 SharePoint Foundation
Topology 84y5
High VIEW SERVER STATE permission updated successfully.
43dae8a1-02e3-43f5-8a06-0417221e6385
12.18.2014 09:45:40.02 PowerShell.exe (0x2058)
0x1E28 SharePoint Foundation
Topology 84y4
High Granting CONTROL SERVER permission for S-1-5-21-3747686279-3738247048-1854932723-1131.
43dae8a1-02e3-43f5-8a06-0417221e6385
12.18.2014 09:45:40.03 PowerShell.exe (0x2058)
0x1E28 SharePoint Foundation
Topology 84y5
High CONTROL SERVER permission updated successfully.
43dae8a1-02e3-43f5-8a06-0417221e6385
12.18.2014 09:45:40.23 PowerShell.exe (0x2058)
0x1E28 SharePoint Foundation
Database 7t6o
High The WSS_Content_powershelltest database does not exist. It will now be created.
43dae8a1-02e3-43f5-8a06-0417221e6385
12.18.2014 09:45:43.03 PowerShell.exe (0x2058)
0x1E28 SharePoint Foundation
Upgrade ajy0d
High 12/18/2014 09:45:43.03 powershell (0x2058) 0x1E28 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPUtility ajy0d DEBUG File C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Web Server Extensions\15\Template\sql\store.sql, Time
out = 0 sec 43dae8a1-02e3-43f5-8a06-0417221e6385
43dae8a1-02e3-43f5-8a06-0417221e6385
12.18.2014 09:48:52.70 PowerShell.exe (0x2058)
0x1E28 SharePoint Foundation
Database 944r
High Adding S-1-5-21-3747686279-3738247048-1854932723-1131 to the role, db_owner, in the database, WSS_Content_powershelltest.
43dae8a1-02e3-43f5-8a06-0417221e6385
12.18.2014 09:48:52.81 PowerShell.exe (0x2058)
0x1E28 SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring b4ly
High Leaving Monitored Scope (Database.Provision (WSS_Content_powershelltest on SQLSERVER\DATABASE)). Execution Time=192653,1989
43dae8a1-02e3-43f5-8a06-0417221e6385
12.18.2014 09:48:57.90 PowerShell.exe (0x2058)
0x1E28 SharePoint Foundation
Upgrade al2ph
High 12/18/2014 09:48:57.90 powershell (0x2058) 0x1E28 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPContentDatabaseSequence al2ph DEBUG Executing SQL DDL Script. 43dae8a1-02e3-43f5-8a06-0417221e6385
43dae8a1-02e3-43f5-8a06-0417221e6385
12.18.2014 09:48:58.03 PowerShell.exe (0x2058)
0x1E28 SharePoint Foundation
Upgrade al2ph
High 12/18/2014 09:48:58.03 powershell (0x2058) 0x1E28 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPContentDatabaseSequence al2ph DEBUG Executing SQL DDL Script. 43dae8a1-02e3-43f5-8a06-0417221e6385
43dae8a1-02e3-43f5-8a06-0417221e6385
12.18.2014 09:48:58.04 PowerShell.exe (0x2058)
0x1E28 SharePoint Foundation
Upgrade al2ph
High 12/18/2014 09:48:58.04 powershell (0x2058) 0x1E28 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPContentDatabaseSequence2 al2ph DEBUG Executing SQL DDL Script. 43dae8a1-02e3-43f5-8a06-0417221e6385
43dae8a1-02e3-43f5-8a06-0417221e6385
12.18.2014 09:48:58.15 PowerShell.exe (0x2058)
0x1E28 SharePoint Foundation
Upgrade ajyw6
High 12/18/2014 09:48:58.15 powershell (0x2058) 0x1E28 SharePoint Foundation Upgrade SPHierarchyManager ajyw6 DEBUG [SPTree Value=SPContentDatabase Name=WSS_Content_powershelltest] added to dependency cache by lookup
43dae8a1-02e3-43f5-8a06-0417221e6385 43dae8a1-02e3-43f5-8a06-0417221e6385
12.18.2014 09:48:58.23 PowerShell.exe (0x2058)
0x1E28 SharePoint Foundation
Database 944r
High Adding S-1-5-21-3747686279-3738247048-1854932723-1131 to the role, SPDataAccess, in the database, WSS_Content_powershelltest.
43dae8a1-02e3-43f5-8a06-0417221e6385
12.18.2014 09:48:58.59 PowerShell.exe (0x2058)
0x1E28 SharePoint Foundation
Database bx4r
High All documents with forward links in content database [SPContentDatabase Name=WSS_Content_powershelltest] is being dirtied.
43dae8a1-02e3-43f5-8a06-0417221e6385
12.18.2014 09:48:58.97 PowerShell.exe (0x2058)
0x1E28 SharePoint Foundation
Database 944r
High Adding S-1-5-21-3747686279-3738247048-1854932723-1131 to the role, SPDataAccess, in the database, WSS_Content_powershelltest.
43dae8a1-02e3-43f5-8a06-0417221e6385
12.18.2014 09:48:58.98 PowerShell.exe (0x2058)
0x1E28 SharePoint Foundation
Monitoring b4ly
High Leaving Monitored Scope (Creating Content Database (WSS_Content_powershelltest on SQLSERVER\DATABASE)). Execution Time=198893,1578
43dae8a1-02e3-43f5-8a06-0417221e6385
The fact that i am able to create a content database through powershell sorts out permissions problems. I am certain of that because the w3wp.exe and the powershell.exe used for both creations were run under the same user.
The timeout always happens aroud 120 seconds after i started the creation. The creation via powershell takes about 3,5 minutes.
Here for the folks that ask me, why i haven't asked google or bing or some other search engine.
I tried the solutions suggested here
http://www.sharepointpals.com/post/Error-while-Creating-Web-Application-through-Central-Administration , here
http://anthonyspiteri.net/sharepoint-2010-web-ui-timeout-creating-web-application-quick-fix/ and here
http://blogs.ibs.com/Duane.Odum/Lists/Posts/Post.aspx?ID=33
which i thought pointed me to the right solution.
But those post unfortunatly didnt worked out.
I also tried to alter the web.config files (i know that isn't recommended or supported, but it didn't change anything so those are back to normal as well)
So here are my question:
Can you guys help me solve this issue?
Are there any other places where timeouts can be managed or defined?
P.S.: I am new to using this forum. so pls don't crucify me for doing a mistake.
P.S.S: My english is very poor also :D
With best regards
Simon

Be careful with settings like these because there may be a much deeper issue at hand. I have had an issue with a customer that manifests itself as a timeout on a site collection. It was very hard to track since it didn't happen frequently. We engaged Microsoft
Support to find out the root cause but all they could point at is a general network issue that pertains to authentication. After digging deeper, we found out that the network issue was caused by a saturated network connectivity to the domain controller that
impacts a site collection when the database is making an authentication call. Keep this solution as more of a quick fix but be sure to conduct a deeper investigation of the real root cause
Edwin Sarmiento SQL Server MVP | Microsoft Certified Master
Blog |
Twitter | LinkedIn
SQL Server High Availability and Disaster Recover Deep Dive Course

Can't update master table when creating a materialized view log.

Hi all,
I am facing a very strange issue when trying to update a table on which I have created a materialized view log (to enable downstream fast refresh of MV's). The database I am working on is 10.2.0.4. Here is my issue:
1. I can successfully update (via merge) a dimension table, call it TABLEA, with 100k updates. However when I create a materialized view log on TABLEA the merge statement hangs (I killed the query after leaving it to run for 8 hrs!). TABLEA has 11m records and has a number of indexes (bitmaps and btree) and constraints on it.
2. I then create a copy of TABLEA, call it TABLEB and re-created all the indexes and constraints that exist on TABLEA. I created a materialzied view log on TABLEB and ran the same update....the merge completed in under 5min!
The only difference between TABLEA and TABLEB is that the dimension TABLEA is referenced by a number of FACT tables (by FKs on the FACTS) however this surely should not cause a problem. I don't understand why the merge on TABLEA is not completing...even though it works fine on its copy TABLEB? I have tried rebuilding the indexes on TABLEA but this did not work.
Any help or ideas on this would be most appreciated.
Kind Regards
Mitesh
email: [email protected]

Thats what I thought, the MVL will only read data that has changed since it was created and wont have the option to load in all the data as though it was made before the table was created.
From what I have read, the MVL is quicker than a Trigger and I have some free code that prooved to work from a MVL using it as a reference to know what records to update. There is not that much to a MVL, a record ID and type of update, New, Update or Delete.
I think what I will have to do is work on a the same principle for the MVL but use a Trigger as this way we can do a full reload if required at any point.
Many thanks for your help.

Insufficient priv error when creating a materialised view using DB link!!!!

Hi,
I have a two databases db1 and db2.
I have created a database link from db2 to access user1 schema in db1.
When i try to create a materialised view by accessing user1 table using user 'user2' in db2 database, i get error "ORA-1031: Insufficient Privilege".
The user2 has the priviliges "create view", "create any view", "create materialised view" etc.
I am able to select data, of the table using the database link, but creating materialised view gives this error.
I want to know if the user "user1" should be granting any privilige to user2, if so how is it possible as user2 dosent exist in db1!
i.e should i give command something like "grant select on user1.table to user2@db2"(this dosent work as it says user2@db2 dosent exist, obviously as its taking user2@db2 as a username in db1 schema)
or is this a problem with user2 priviliges in db2 database, if so what are all the priviliges that have to be given to user2 in db2 schema.
regards,

Hi,
User from db1 can not assign any privs to user on db2 database. If user from db1 want to access any object from db2 database, then on local level user2 on db2 should have all the acess to required object. Then you can use user2 on db2 using dblink from db1 user to access those objects residing on remote database.
If user1 from db1 can grant privs to user2 on db2 database on any objects on db2 database then it is highly security issue. This is not permitted.
Regards
e.g.
conn userx@db2
grant select on userx.table1 to user2;
conn user2@db2
select count(*) from userx.table1;
conn user1@db1
select count(*) from userx.table1@db2_dblink;
Edited by: skvaish1 on Apr 29, 2010 3:57 PM

Possible bug when creating multiple detail view objects

using jdev 11.1.1.0.0 to build jsf/adf applications. I wanted to report what seems like a bug in 11g. I have a parent table which has two child tables. After creating the appropriate entities, associations, views, and view links, the app module looks like this:
MasterView
--DetailView1
--DetailView2
The two detail view objects are on the same level, they are both direct children of the Master view.
Here's what's happening:
1) I create the master entity/view objects (MasterView)
2) I create one of the detail entity/view objects (DetailView1).
3) I create the association and view link to establish relationship between MasterView and DetailView1. Everything works fine.
4) I create the entity/view objects for second detail view (DetailView2)
5) When I attempt to create a second view link (based off an association) to establish the relationship between MasterView and DetailView2, the query clauses of the Create View Link wizard (screens 4 and 5) do not get created properly. I finish the wizard and save. Not only does this view link not get created properly, but in the process the query clauses that were defined in the first view link between MasterView and DetailView1 are wiped out. This will break any coordination between master and detail views in both the app module tester and runtime. Has anyone seen this problem?

fyi, it looks like this issue has been resolved with jdev 11.1.1.0.2 (Update 2)

When creating a database (DBCA) or after.

Greetings -
When I create a database using 'dbca' I ordinarily just create a 'vanilla'
database - no more then location of files and accepting the defaults.
After creating the db I launch Enterprise Manager and then change any
settings that I need to make or want to make.
My question - is there any compeling reason to use 'dbca' instead of EM
to make the changes to the database - one case is while it is being
created and the other is after it has been created ?
Any thoughts would be appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Brian

damorgan wrote:
The one big advantage of using DBCA is that one of the end products is the build script.
I am personally against making changes, of almost every type and description, using EM due to the lack of ability to reliably run in test and then repeat the exact same actions in prod.
For creating "real" databases, not just dev and training, I would recommend using a script created with dbca and from that point on editing and modifying the script. GUIs that do not create repeatable scripts are great for monitoring but not for modifying.Daniel,
I would put a finer point on that ... When using dbca to generate a script for creating a database, if one chooses one of the pre-configured templates (OLTP, Data Warehouse, etc) what you get in the end is a script that creates a database by restoring a pre-packaged backup. If you choose to create a "custom" database, what you get in the end is a script that launches sqlplus and issues a CREATE DATABASE command. One big difference I see is that with the latter approach, the database will naturally be created at the current patch level. It also should give the dba far more flexibility in what he can tweak in the scripts, though it's been so long since I've actually looked at one of the 'create by restore' scripts, I couldn't swear to it.
In fact, I really can't remember the last time I used dbca to create any scripts for me, as I just keep re-using the same set. I even went so far as to go through a "master set" and replace any reference to the sid name with recognizable tags, then use sed to touch it up just before execuing.

Disconnected when creating a materialize view

when i try to create a materialize view from a "big" select (a select from several other selects), it doesn't create the view and i get disconnected from the database.

Hi,
Please make sure you are editing in Advanced Mode, then click the part of <WebPartPages:XsltListViewWebPart ...>
Thanks,
Dennis Guo
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Dennis Guo
TechNet Community Support

Error when creating a database on SQL Server 2012(Virtual Machine)

Hi,
I create a virtual machine on VMWare Workstation 10, then install Windows 7(32bit), then install SQL Server 2012 Enterprise version.
Then I write a Visual C++2008 program and using ADO to connect to the local SQL Server, with the connection string below:
“Provider=sqloledb;Data Source=(local);Integrated Security=SSPI;”
The connect succeed, then I try to create a new SQL Server database by calling:
m_pConnection->Execute(_T(“create database MyDatabase on primary (name = ‘MyDatabase’, filename = ‘E:\\MyDatabase.mdf’)”), NULL, 0);
where E: is a USB drive plugged in.
When running the above statement, I can even see the MyDatabase.mdf file is being created, but finally get an error and error number is 80040e31 when checking the error from m_pConnection, after analyzing the com exception, we find it reports the error as
“IDispath error #3121”. Both errors seem to indicate a “Timeout error”.
Then I try to create the database on the local drive in the virtual machine, as follows:
m_pConnection->Execute(_T(“create database MyDatabase on primary (name = ‘MyDatabase’, filename = ‘C:\\MyDatabase.mdf’)”), NULL, 0);
Then I get error number: 80040e14 from m_pConnection, and com error is “IDispath error #3092”
What is the problem?
Thanks

Hello chcw,
SQL Server 2012 Enterprise doesn't support to install on Windows 7 Opeating System. For detail information, please refer to the article below:
The article shows the operating system requirements for the principal editions of SQL Server 2012:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143506.aspx#top_principal
Here is an article for your reference, please see:
How To Create a SQL Server Database Programmatically by Using ADO.NET and Visual C# .NET:
https://support.microsoft.com/kb/307283/en-us
If you have any feedback on our support, please click
here.
Regards,
Elvis Long
TechNet Community Support

Issue when creating sales order with Sold-to/Ship-to Party's state

Hi All,
we have issue while creating Sales Order with picking up of State tax
for Ship-to-party & Sold-to-party.
<b>When we create a sales order, for the sold to party 140052732 and
ship to party 140052733 it is picking state tax. Which should not
suppose to pick? Because the partner is marked as tax exemption</b>.
Can any body tell me how can we solve this issue!
Why this is happening!
How to make not to pick tax when it is marked for tax exemtion.
As i am not Functional guy i am not aware what is happening here!
Can anybody solve this issue!
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Deep.

Hi Deep
What do you mean by "It is picking up state tax"? Does it mean that in the pricing procedure it is picking up a condition type which is meant for state tax?
If so go and check the condition record meant for it. Follow the following steps
1) Go to Sales order
2) Select the line item for which the state tax is being picked.
3) In the condition tab select analysis.
4) In Analysis you shall find the condition type meant for state tax.
5) See which condition record has been found.
6) Go to VK12, enter the state tax condition type and check the condition record for that state tax.
7) If wrong correct it.
8) If anything else come back to the post and inform the details
Thanks
Regards
Sunil

Issue when creating sales order with Sold-to/Ship-to Party's state tax

Hi All,
we have issue while creating Sales Order with picking up of State tax
for Ship-to-party & Sold-to-party.
<b>When we create a sales order, for the sold to party 140052732 and
ship to party 140052733 it is picking state tax. Which should not
suppose to pick? Because the partner is marked as tax exemption</b>.
Can any body tell me how can we solve this issue!
Why this is happening!
How to make not to pick tax when it is marked for tax exemtion.
As i am not Functional guy i am not aware what is happening here!
Can anybody solve this issue!
Thanks in advance.
Thanks,
Deep.

Hi Deep
What do you mean by "It is picking up state tax"? Does it mean that in the pricing procedure it is picking up a condition type which is meant for state tax?
If so go and check the condition record meant for it. Follow the following steps
1) Go to Sales order
2) Select the line item for which the state tax is being picked.
3) In the condition tab select analysis.
4) In Analysis you shall find the condition type meant for state tax.
5) See which condition record has been found.
6) Go to VK12, enter the state tax condition type and check the condition record for that state tax.
7) If wrong correct it.
8) If anything else come back to the post and inform the details
Thanks
Regards
Sunil

Issue in Creating an "EXISTS" View Criteria

Hi,
Jdev -11.1.1.5.0
Following is the usecase to apply 'Exists' View criteria.
We have one NodesEO and two VOs (NodesVO & TopicsVO) which are from same NodesEO.
NodesVO=> Used to form tree structure . Filtering topics with topic_type is null
SELECT * FROM MD_TOPICS NodesEO WHERE NodesEO.TOPIC_TYPE is null and doc_name is not null ORDER BY NodesEO.DOC_NAME
TopicsVO=> Used to prepare ADF table based on selected tree nodes. Filtering nodes with topic_type is not null
SELECT * FROM MD_TOPICS NodesEO WHERE NodesEO.TOPIC_TYPE is not null
Issue: As of now, iam preparing list of selected nodes from tree and then sending the comma separated string to IN clause.
As there is limitation for maximum number of expressions in a list is 1000.
Iam trying to Create an 'EXISTS' View Criteria. So i got reference to implement the same.
http://one-size-doesnt-fit-all.blogspot.in/2011/02/adf-bc-creating-exists-view-criteria.html
Look like, we need to have ViewLink to create EXISTS VC. I tried to create VL from TopicsVOToNodesVO. At the end, I dragged the TopicsVO instance as a table on jsff.
Here iam unable to filter the rows from NodesVO based on checkbox status.
Iam using transient attribute (checkboxConfirmedStatus- String, checkboxCOnfirmed- boolean). Here i've applied VC on transient attribute by selecting 'In memory' option.
At run time, iam getting exception.
<QueryCollection> <buildResultSet> [1729] java.sql.SQLException: Attempt to set a parameter name that does not occur in the SQL: bind_checkboxConfirmed
Please suggest any option to filter the rows from NodesVO based on checkbox (transient attribute) status before applying 'Exists' clause.
Let me know, if I am in wrong process.
Thanks in advance,
Samba.

Can some one suggest on our issue?
Thanks,
Samba.

Issue When Creating a Database View

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for