Issue with invoice

Hi Experts
I am facing an issue with invoice. When i am cancelling an invoice , the system is actually not clearing the accounting doc for original invoice and neither it is clearing the accounting doc for cancelled invoice.
Also if i see the customer line item of the accounting doc for the cancelled invoice , then instead of taking the posting key as 12 i.e. Reverse Invoice it is taking as 11 : Credit Memo which is quite unusual and as far as i know this is something standard and not modifiable.
Kindly let me know if you can suggest any solution or comments to this issue
Thanks

Hi,
Check copy controls in VTFF.
Cancelled invoice should have the original invoice number in header and original invoice should contain the cancelled tick at header.
Check if you are getting those status in the respective documents.
Also, your delivery or order with reference to which the invoice was created will become open or being processed.
Also try running std program for reorganization of status indexes in SE38 , program RVV05IVB.
Regards,
Amit

Similar Messages

Issue with Invoice, credit memo

Hi Guru's,
A sales invoice was created in the for 100,000 and the value fields in COPA that were hit were:-
Billed quantity
phl volume
Quantity 01
sales quantity
Non-reporting WXX1
Other sale ded
other sale ded 2
Revenue
Standard cogs 5
Standard price
Customer service needed to pass credit but a the credit memo was created for the full amount 100,000 of the invoice by mistake.
The credit memo hit the following value fields in COPA
Non-reporting WXX1
Other sale ded
other sale ded 2
Revenue
To correct the mistake of the credit memo a debit memo was created (but with the wrong amount 50,000) and it also hit the same value fields as the credit memo.
To correct this my thought is reverse the debit memo with the wrong amounts and recreate the debit memo with the full amount bringing the invoice back to the full amount. Then re-create the credit memo which I hope then will hit COGS ? fixing and the showing the correct values in COPA? Or is there a better way to go around this issue.
Please advice.
Best Regards,
Yasmeen

Thanks Kiran for response.
Let me clear the question.
GR posting detail.
Reference no - 12345, doc date 06/21/2008, posting date 06/21/2008, amount 1, USD, CC-100.
Can I post the invoice against the same detail using MRHR.
(I'm not sure what extactly MRHR verify for dupliacte entry because, I can post the IR if the I'm changing the docu date from 06/21/2008 to any other date.)
I'm able to simulate the IR without any error while using MR01.
Regards,
Aditya

Multi Language issue with Invoice Printing

I have a Custom Report for Invoice. Now it has been associated to a Concurrent Program and if I submit the request through SRS, I am able to see Report output.
Same report I have associated to iReceivables application and invoke it from there (using custom PL/SQL APIs). On invoking the procedure with the same same parameter list as in the first case, I donot get any output.
I have tried to see the log. The obvious difference I noticed is that on being submitted though the SRS, the NLS function returns a different Language code than when we see the request log of the case when it is being submitted through iReceivables.
Any clues can be really helpful.
Thanks
Sumit

First goto se73 and click on system barcode > then search for ur barcode name. if the barcode is a standard one, copy it into ur Z barcode and increase the size of barcode and then test it. As chinese character's are 2-byte so probably the barcode length is small.
regards
Arun Kumar

Issue with invoice lists

I have created 5 Ordes all for the same customer but with 2 of the order having a different Division on the sales area
Can someone please tell me when invoice lists are created from VF24, would this group the billing doc into 1 invoice list or would this split them into different invoice list since the division is different even tho the customer is the same .
Can someone help.
regards
ady

thank you for your response.
please see below the split analysis. Hope you can help.
Split analy.
Split due to different header data
Fld Name
0090075253
0090075252
Billing date for billing index
20091202
20091201
Price list type
Z1
Incoterms (Part 2)
costs and freight
COSTS AND FREIGHTS
Combination criteria in the bi
003CMGD0080026671F67
003CMAV0080026670F18
Update group for statistics up
000001
Division
GD
AV
Reference Document Number
0090075253
0090075252
Assignment number
0090075253
0090075252
Translation Date
20091202
20091201
Payment Reference
0090075253
0090075252
Regards

Print preview issue with invoice script

Hi folks
i am working on preparing UTP for a invoice script(modification of standard one).
here when i am running the billing document number in VF02 i am not able to see the print preview.
i would like to know what should i do on this as i need a printpreview to prepare UTP on this layout.
when i select the message type(output type) of that layout and press the option print preview nothing is happening.
when i say print in the status bar it is giving success message and when i saw in the spool the status is in waiting.
can anyone let me know what i need to do ?
thanks in advance

Hi
Do u know the o/p type of the script ?
if not ist see the out put type by going to Tcode NACE
after thatjust go through the steps...
1 vf02 > give a doc no-> enter
2
from menue bar chose GOTO> Header> output
3.
now give the output type . medium -> printout press enter
4
save and go bck to 1st screen of vf02
from menue bar chose billing document--> issueoutput type
chose select the printout and select print preview.
rewards if useful
Regards
Sachhi

SRM issue with Invoice delta loads

I am loading data into DSO - 0SRIV_D3 (Invoices) from SRM where I am getting duplicate data records updated into the DSO. The extractor for this DSO is 0SRM_TD_IV is AIMD which should deliver only after image delta records on changes.
Can someone advise what needs to be done to avoid data record duplication ?
In the Data source setting, the 'Delivery of Duplicate Data Records is set to "Undefined" ' mode. I have tried to change the data source setting to "None" but this is greyed out and cannot change in BI. Any help?
Thanks.
Ramesh

I have been wondering about the same thing. Some information would be greatly appreciated. Anyone?
Thanks and best regards
debru

ISSUE: TDS REVERSAL DURING ADVANCE CLEARING WITH INVOICE

Dear All
I am having problem related to TDS reversal.
For e.g
Advance payment to Vendor: rs 10000/
Tds deducted is rs 200/
Now Invoice posted for amount is: 100000/
Tds deductes is rs 1000/
We know that TDS on rs 10000 is deducted twice which is generally reversed during advance clearing with invoice through F-54. But when I am clearing Ad. with Invoice, no TDS is getting reversed.
Please help me on this issue or is there any other way of doing this process.
points will be awarded
Thanks in advance
sandeep panwar

Hi
run the program RWTF010 in SE38
Regards
Sanil Bhandari

Issue with cancelled invoice

Hi all,
We got an issue with cancelled invoices.
The user cancelled an invoice and in leiu of that created one more invoice against that.
When we extracted the deltas to BI, the cancelled invoice is appearing as cancelled Item wise but not the entire document is cancelled.
Please suggest what can be the issue and how to rectify this.
Regards
Kumar

Hi
Please check in the delivery document in VBUK and VBUP tables. Also check in the delivery document as the status showing 'C' should be Fully Picked and not fully invoiced.Also check the copy controls VTFL.Can you let us know what is the billing document type that has been used for cancelling billing document. Check in the F2 billing document type weather cancellation billing document type has been assigned or not.
Regards
Srinath

Issue with blocked invoices.

Hi All,
I am having an issue with few of our invoices are not releasing for payment.
Couple of them I noticed were due in June or July but were notpaid. These invoices were blocked due to price variance. Someone went and changed the price in P.O so the difference is within tolerance now. It should be released once 'MRBR' runs in batch everyday. but it's not.I dont see any reason it should be blocked now.
I know I can release it manually but we dont know how many are behaving this way.How should I find the reason why they are not getting released by MRBR.

Hi,
Do you have the workflow active?
Check transaction miro_workflow.
Cheers
Hein

Issue with VC/2 - not fetching the invoice details

Hi All,
We have an issue with TCode VC/2 in ECC 6. This is not fetching( not showing) the Invoice documents under the header "Last SD Documents".
It is fetching the sales documents like orders, credit memo/debit memo requests but not the invoice documents.
PLease help on this.
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: Harini Kesani on Jan 12, 2010 8:25 PM

Is it possible that 'last SD document' means 'last sales document', not 'last billing document'? Unfortunately, I'm unable to confirm - we don't use this transaction. You can also check what tables are used in this transaction (get help from an ABAPer or Basis) and then check if there is correct data in those tables. It might be using info structures or index tables, which may need to be populated first.

In BI Publisher RTF table layout issue for invoice printing

Hi,
I am working on check printing and invoice printing project on bi publisher and i am facing one issue. That is i have used section break on check priting so because of that if the the records are more than 20 then check will print on second page and on first page there would be void printed othervise it should print on first page only. In this case the preprinted stationary is not having invoice table form. we are using blank preprinted stationary to print this .
Now i have done with invoice and cheque layout but in output if the number of records are more than 20 then its going to second page but the problem is that invoice table break into two parts and and the end lineof table layout is not coming on first page .even on second page i am not getting start layout line to make complete table outline.
I want that full table layouton both the pages of the table. i have tried to to create table skeleton and used it as a watermark to print all the records on it but it is coming in to the middle of the page .so it not working.
Please anyone knows the solution on this problem please let me know or share your thoughts on this issue.
As i have tried many options but still stuck into this issue .Kindly help me.
Regards,
Prachi G.

Hmmm ... sounds like a regression bug.
I would contact support, provide, the version you are using, layout template, sample XML data, 2000 RTF output and 2003 RTF output and ask them to investigate.
Tim

ISSUE WITH SERVICE PURCHASE ORDER STATUS

Hi
There is an issue with a Service PO.When I created a service p.o the
p.o value was 1,543,695.60 USD . I created service entry sheet and GR
for 1,029,130.40 USD.
The still to be delivered amount should be 1,543,695.60-1,029,130.40 =514565.20 USD
But the Amount Still to be delivered in p.o STATUS HEADER DATA screen shows 191,761.60 USD.
Actually the system should show the delivered status as 514565.20 USD.
What should be the cause for this???
I checked the invoice also.Invoicing is done for 1,029,130.40 USD.
Apperciate ur immediate feedback on this.

Hi
S012 is updated by the Purchase Order creation date, not the Goods Receipt date. e.g. a Purchase Order is created in January and good receipt is in February and March, S012 will shows the values in period January.
try Transaction MC26
Info structure S012 Update group (stats) SAP
Double click on Goods received qty
In the section Date field for period determination
check regarding date or change accordingly
hope it helps.

Issue with down payment tax cal and clearing it aganest vendor inv

HI,
I have an issue with down payment tax cal.
1.     I had configured withholding tax and raised down payment, tax has been cal
2.     In the next step I had raised inv, at this time also tax had been cal
3.     When I am doing down payment clearing the tax collected at the time of down payment had to be reversed but itu2019s not.
Can any one give me solution for clearing the tax that cal on down payment.
Thanking you.

Dear
Vendor master has got tax codes both at the time of payment and at the time of invoice. Hence system is calculating tds on both occassions.
Since you pay advance first tds calculated is right. Now while doing miro remove the tax codes manually and do miro/mir7/fb60.
If already MIRO/MIR7/FB60 done then reverse the invoice document and clear the tax GL accounts.
Regards

Performance Issue with BSIS(open accounting items)

Hey All,
      I am having serious performance issue with a accrual report which gets all open GL items, and need some tips for optimization.
The main issue is that I am accesing large tables like BSIS, BSEG, BSAS etc without proper indexes and that I am dealing with huge amounts of data.
The select itself take a long time and after that as I have so much data overall execution is slow too.
The select which concerns me the most is:
SELECT zuonr hkont gjahr belnr buzei budat blart wrbtr shkzg xblnr waers bukrs
             INTO TABLE i_bsis
              FROM bsis
              WHERE bukrs = '1000'
              AND hkont in r_hkont
              AND budat <= p_lcdate
              AND augdt = 0
              AND augbl = space
              AND gsber = c_ZRL1
              AND gjahr BETWEEN l_gjahr2 AND l_gjahr
              AND ( blart = c_re      "Invoice
              OR    blart = c_we      "Goods receipt
              OR    blart = c_zc      "Invoice Cancels
              OR    blart = c_kp ).   "Accounting offset
I have seen other related threads, but was not that helpful.
We already have a secondary index on bukrs hkont and budat, and i have checked in ST05 that it does use it. But inspite that it takes more than 15 hrs to complete(maybe because of huge data).
Any Input is highly appreciated.
Thanks

Thank you Thomas for your inputs:
You said that R_HKONT contains several ranges of account numbers. If these ranges cover a significant
portion of the overall existing account numbers, then there is no really quick access possible via the
BSIS primary key.
Unfortunately R_HKONT contains all account numbers.
As Rob said, your index on HKONT and BUDAT does not help much, since you are selecting "<=" on
BUDAT. No chance of narrowing down that range?
Will look into this.
What about GSBER? Does the value in c_ZRL1 provide a rather small subset of the overall values? Then
an index on BUKRS and GSBER might be helpful.
ZRL1 does provide a decent selection . But I dont know if one more index is a good idea on overall
system performance.
I assume that the four document types are not very selective, so it probably does not pay off to
investigate selecting on BKPF (there is an index involving BLART) and joining BSIS for the additional
information. You still might want to look into it though.
I did try to investigate this option too. Based on other threads related to BSIS and Robs Suggestion in
those threads I tried this:
SELECT bukrs belnr gjahr blart budat
FROM bkpf INTO TABLE bkpf_l
        WHERE bukrs = c_pepsico
        AND bstat IN (' ', 'A', 'B', 'D', 'M', 'S', 'V', 'W', 'Z')
        AND blart IN ('RE', 'WE', 'ZC', 'KP')
        AND gjahr BETWEEN l_gjahr2 AND l_gjahr
        AND budat <= p_lcdate.
SELECT zuonr hkont gjahr belnr buzei budat blart wrbtr shkzg xblnr waers bukrs
           FROM bsis INTO TABLE i_bsis FOR ALL ENTRIES IN bkpf_l
                     WHERE bukrs = bkpf_l-bukrs
                      AND hkont IN r_hkont
                      AND budat = bkpf_l-budat
                      AND augdt = 0
                      AND augbl = space
                      AND gjahr = bkpf_l-gjahr
                      AND belnr = bkpf_l-belnr
                      AND blart = bkpf_l-blart
                      AND gsber = c_zrl1.
The improves the select on BSIS a lot, but the first select on BKPF kills it. Not sure if this would help
improve performance.
Also I was wondering whether it helps on refreshing the tabe statistics through DB20. The last refresh
was done 7 months back. How frequently should we do this? Will it help?

Facing an Issue with Payables Open Interface Import

Hi
I am facing an issue with the Payables Open Interface Import...
My Requirement is:
1. Need to upload the PO, Supplier, Invoice #, Invoice Date details to custom table (through web ADi)
2. From custom table storing in the AP invoice interface tables.
3. From Interface table, calling API (Payables Open Interface Import) which wil create the invoive (PO matched)
Now, If user has given wrong data some reasons....Payables Open Interface Import has rejected that entry....user has checked this and corrected later and trying to create the same invoice with the correcte data....As there is a rejected a line exists on the Header interface, line interface...even though if he pass the correct data in the second time it is cosidering that rejected row and not processing the correct row...
Can any one suggest on this...
Regards,
Bala

When processing a record, you can check if another ap_invoice_interface record exists for the same invoice number and
1) Delete the old record and then insert a new one
OR
2) Update the old record instead of creating a new one
Hope this helps,
Sandeep Gandhi

Issue with invoice

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for