Issue with Measure formula

Hello friends,
I am having an issue with the following MDX script. I have separated out all the IIF Conditions to make it easy to read. This is a periodic measusre.Liability, income and expense accounts appear just fine. However Asset accounts' 2011.Q3 and 2010.total values are just blank. please advise.
IIF ([%ACCOUNTDIM%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("ACCTYPE")="INC",
-MEASURES.[SIGNEDDATA],
IIF([%ACCOUNTDIM%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("ACCTYPE")="EXP",
MEASURES.[SIGNEDDATA],
IIF([%ACCOUNTDIM%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("ACCTYPE")="AST" AND [DATASRC].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("ID")="CTA",
MEASURES.[SIGNEDDATA],
IIF([%ACCOUNTDIM%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("ACCTYPE")="AST",
(MEASURES.[SIGNEDDATA],CLOSINGPERIOD([%TIMEDIM%].[%TIMEBASELEVEL%])),IIF([%ACCOUNTDIM%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("ACCTYPE")="LEQ",
-(MEASURES.[SIGNEDDATA],CLOSINGPERIOD([%TIMEDIM%].[%TIMEBASELEVEL%])),
-MEASURES.[SIGNEDDATA])))))

Yes ZalakT . You are correct . I tried same and its retrieving blank when specified DATASRC or any dimension with ID comparison in measure formula .ie DATASRC.CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("ID")="CTA" or %ACCOUNTDIM%.CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("ID")="xxxx" .
I tried following way and it retrieved periodic totals for asset accounts . ie for 2011.TOTAL & 2011.Q1 its retrieving total of base months instead of closing period's value for asset accounts .
1) don't not change PERIODIC measure formula .
2) Add FORMULA property to DATASRC .Add new member CTA_CALC to DATASRC . In formula property of CTA_CALC specify
IIF([ACCOUNT].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("ACCTYPE")="AST",[MEASURES].[SIGNEDDATA],[DATASRC].[CTA])
3) save some data in (CTA,PERIODIC) for both Asset & non Asset accounts . Retrieve same data from CTA_CALC .
let me know if it works .

Similar Messages

Issue with Member Formula written for Balance Type

Folks,
I am facing an issue with a member formula written for a balance type dimension,
The code says
IIF( IsUda([Accounts].CurrentMember, "BalanceSheet"),
CASE
*WHEN IS([Time].currentmember,[YearTotal]) THEN MISSING*
WHEN IsLevel([Time].CurrentMember, 0) THEN (BALTYPE.[EndOfPeriod])
WHEN IS([Time].currentmember,[Q1]) THEN (BALTYPE.[EndOfPeriod],Time.[MAR])
WHEN IS([Time].currentmember,[Q2]) THEN (BALTYPE.[EndOfPeriod],Time.[JUN])
WHEN IS([Time].currentmember,[Q3]) THEN (BALTYPE.[EndOfPeriod],Time.[SEP])
WHEN IS([Time].currentmember,[Q4]) THEN (BALTYPE.[EndOfPeriod],Time.[DEC])
END
,MISSING)
Outline Structure for Time dimension looks like below
+Time
--|+YearTotal
------|+Q1
----------|+Jan
----------|+Feb
----------|+Mar
The highlighted Part of the code works good for all the Measures which is With the UDA tag BalanceSheet, Except if the Measure with BalanceSheet UDA is a Parent Member.
Parent Level Measures are populated with Data(populating Dec Data) instead of showing #MISSING.
Any help on this issue will be appreciated.
Thanks
Sathish

Hello Gurus,
I raised an SR with Oracle support and they have replied by saying that, In EPM 11.1.2.4, the IE11 is only supported for interactive reporting and we will have to use IE 10 & 9 for workspace.
Yes. It works fine in IE 10 & 9.
Thanks,
Siva

Issue with date formula when running a report on the 1st day of the month

We have a formula that compares last month data against last year last month, the report runs on the 1st of every month although the report errors when it tries to run in January being the first month of the new year it tries to look for a month begining with Zero instead of looking back at decemeber which would be 12.
Does anyone any solutions for this issue?
Thanks,
Chris
Example of some formula's we have tried but none seem to work.
if {@MonthName} = "December" then year({CDCCHD.CDOPDT}) in year(currentdate)-1 to year(currentdate)-2 else year({CDCCHD.CDOPDT}) in year(currentdate)
OR
(if {@Last Full Month Name}= "December" then year({CDCCHD.CDOPDT})= year(currentdate)-2 or
{CDCCHD.CDOPDT} in lastyearytd else {CDCCHD.CDOPDT} in lastyearytd or
{CDCCHD.CDOPDT} in yeartodate)
OR
({CDCCHD.CDOPDT} in dateserial(year(currentdate)-1,month(currentdate),01)-1 to dateserial(year(currentdate)-1,month(currentdate)-1,01) or
{CDCCHD.CDOPDT} in lastfullmonth)
OR
if {@monthname} = "December" then {CDCCHD.CDOPDT} in dateadd("m", -28, (currentdate)) to (currentdate)-14 else {CDCCHD.CDOPDT} in dateadd("m", -14, (currentdate)) to (currentdate)

Chris,
Give these formulas a try...
Beg of Last Month
DateAdd("m", DateDiff("m",#1/1/1900#, CurrentDate) - 1, #1/1/1900#)
End of Last Month
DateAdd("m", DateDiff("m",#1/1/1900#, CurrentDate), #1/1/1900#)
Beg December of Last Year
IF DatePart("m",CurrentDate) = 1
THEN DateSerial(DatePart("yyyy",CurrentDate) -2, 12,1)
ELSE DateSerial(DatePart("yyyy",CurrentDate) -1, 12,1)
End December of Last Year
IF DatePart("m",CurrentDate) = 1
THEN DateSerial(DatePart("yyyy",CurrentDate) -1, 1,1)
ELSE DateSerial(DatePart("yyyy",CurrentDate), 1,1)
Note that the "End" formulas produce a value that shows midnight of the following day that you would normally expect to see... For example, if you are expecting to see 12/31/2009, it will show 1-1-2010.
The reason is that the formulas come out to be midnight of the day shown... So a range of 12/1/2009 - 1/1/2010 will include 12/31/2009's data but none of 1/1/2010... (12/1/2009 - 12/31/2009 would actually cut off 12/31/2009).
If for some reason your data is stored w/o time values then an adjustment would need to be mande.
HTH,
Jason

RE: Issue with the formula

hi,
I have one formula like below.
   X = - ' &0T_CMONV& / Actuals' +
          ' &0T_CMONV& / S&OP / &ZDPTPLN1&'.
   where &0T_CMONV& / Actuals = restricted key fig. with 0calmonth and Actuals key figure(&0T_CMONV& - text variable for cal month)
     and &0T_CMONV& / S&OP / &ZDPTPLN1& = restricted key fig. with 0cal month and Demand.
   Now we get some negitive values for this key figure , the user doesnot want to see the negitive values. So we have done, Absolute value of X. But now what he says is , he wants to see the negitive values but the result of that key figure should be sum of all absolute values. So we provided to him , extra column giving the result as the sum of all absolute values. So let us say , the sum of all values of key figure X including negitive values is 50(X1) and the sum of all absolute values of key figure X is 300(X2).Now when we are using X2 in another calculated key figure it is supposed to take 300 as the value but it is taking only 50 as the value and doing the calculation. What is the reason for this ? Can't we do some calculation on 300(X2).I request some help on this issue.
Thanks ,

Somesh,
Welcome to SDN!
For the infoobjects used in the Query Designer, click on the propereties and there you have an option - reverse +/- signs.
Did you try with this
Hope this helps!

Issue with member formula editor in Planning 11.1.2.4

Hello Gurus,
I just wanted to add a formula for a planning application member through workspace (v.11.1.2.4), but when I tried member -> edit -> member formula... it stays there by saying the 'Loading Member Formula Editor'.................. nothing happens after that.. same case with all the members.. I am using IE.11...
any tricks??
Thanks,
Siva

Hello Gurus,
I raised an SR with Oracle support and they have replied by saying that, In EPM 11.1.2.4, the IE11 is only supported for interactive reporting and we will have to use IE 10 & 9 for workspace.
Yes. It works fine in IE 10 & 9.
Thanks,
Siva

Issue with subtraction formula in Hyperion report

Hi,
I am facing this peculiar issue. I have to subtract 2 values in 2 columns, A & B and suppose the value in A1 = 0 & B1 = 25 then the result should be -25, which is not. I am getting the resulting value as zero. Did anybody face this issue before?
Please advice
Thanks & Regards,
Gyanesh

** Please ignore. It only works for 0. I am doing couple of tests now.
Can you type your formula here?
My test has worked for this formula: 0-[A,3]
Cheers,
Mehmet
Edited by: Mehmet Sevinc on Mar 20, 2012 10:36 AM

Issue with Zoom- Formula option in Excel add in

Hi All,
In spreadsheet add in when I enable the option, Essbase->Options->Zoom->Formulas and then do a retrieve operation for a level 0 member having a formula in the outline, it returns the members that are included in the formula. The above works fine for a BSO application.
But when I do the same operation on a level 0 member of an ASO application that has a formula associated to it does not retrieve the members of the formula.
Can anyone help me on the above.
Thanks,
Raja

I'm guessing that the zoom in on formula does not understand MDX. IT works for the BSO cube on simple calculations because it can understand calc script language and figure out the member names. When it gets to complex formulas in BSO it can't do it any more. MDX is a different animal for Essbase and I'll bet they never thought about modifying the add-in for ASO. As far as I know there were no special modifications to the add-in for ASO

Issues with a formula in multiple cells

I have a simple formula in cell H6. It's "=C6-H4". I'm trying to get a long row of cells below it to create similar formulas, namely: =C7-H4, =C8-H4, and so on. The C cell increments by one and the H cell stays the same. There's got to be an easy way to do this. If I highlight the original formula and drag it down, the new formulas it generates increments both the C and the H cells (=C7-H5, =C8-H6,...). Short of editing each cell, is there a quicker way to do this?

H6=C6-H$4
Must use an absolute reference. In this case it is an absolute row.

Issue with the formula calculation in 2 structures

Hello all,
For a query we have defined 2 structures,One in Rows and another one in Columns.
In Rows, we have created local formula's . And in columns also we have few local formlas in which we are tyring to calculate Variable values, that is difference between two kf's.
When the local formula is having more than one mathematical formula, it is not calculating Variable values, instead it is applying the same formula defined at Row level.
Ex: consider we have a KF X , which is a local formula defined in Rows
as below
Y is having value of 200
Z is 150
X= nodim(Y/Z *100)( Y and Z are KF's)
and in Columns Var==Actual value- Planned Value which should be equal to 90 (suppose actual is 200 and Planned is 110)
As per the above formula it should display 90 , instead of it its displaying ( 200/150 *100)..This is happening only when a Formula is having more that one mathematical caluclation...
As a work around I have defined ithe varaible values in Cell definition.
I would like to know can we use more than one mathematical operation, when we have two structures.
Thanks

HI,
This is due to Cell Contaradction . For CKF or new formula change properties in advanced tab as use result of this formula like below :
Try once .
Thanks.

Issue with Formula on Brand Family Level

Hi Friends,
we are facing issue with the formula while showing the report output.
Following is the scenario.
BrandFamily(Char),Material(Char),Comp(Char), Kf1(Keyfig) ,Kf2(Keyfig)
Data Records:
1st Record -
>    B1, M1, 200, 100
2nd Record -
>    B1, M2, 500, 400
3rd Record -
>   B2, M3, 100, 300
4th Record -
>   B2, M4, 600, 200
Formual --> If Kf1>Kf2 then Kf1 Elseif Kf1<Kf2 then Kf2
1) Report displayed based on the BrandFamily and Material , then the report shows correctly as below
Report Structure :- Brandfamily , Material are in Rows and the Colum has the Formula (that was mentioned above)
Report Output :-
B1 M1 200
B1 M2 500
B2 M3 300
B2 M4 600
On Summing , For B1 , Value is 700. For B2, Value is 900.
2) 1) Report displayed based on the BrandFamily , then the report shows wrongly for the formula value as shown below
Report Structure :- Brand Family is in Rows and the Colum has the Formula (that was mentioned above)
Report Output:-
B1 700
B2 700
      Here For B1, Value is 700 which is matching with the earlier output
Whereas For B2, Value is 700 which is not matching with the earlier output.
The Value for B2 is wrong because the formula has not processed correctly the 3rd record .
The report summed up the 3rd and 4th records and then applied the formula , because of which the issue.
This is because the Values kf1 and Kf2 are based on the material and as the material is not part of the Rows .
Thankyou in advance.
LNV

a more simpler solution.
open the kf in edit mode which has the condition
create two formula variables as follows.
BRANDFAMILY
replacement path , reference characteristic brand famility
got replacement path tab-> replacevaue with as ' infobject' replace with as 'attribute value' , attribute constant 1.
MATERIAL
replacement path , reference characteristic material.
got replacement path tab-> replacevaue with as ' infobject' replace with as 'attribute value' , attribute constant 1.
MODIFY the KF as
BRANDFAMILY * MATERIAL * condition.
had exactly same requirement

Running Total Issue or Possibly Formula Issue in Crystal Reports 9

Post Author: Jeffs23
CA Forum: Formula
My issue involves two formula's - @TotalTime and @Converted Time and a Running Total (RTotal0).
@TotalTime{Data.ApptTime}/60@Converted Timenumbervar x := {#RTotal0};totext(truncate(x),0,"")" Hrs "totext(remainder(x,truncate(x))*60,0,"") + " Mins"Running Total (RTotal0)
Field to Summarize - @TotalTime
Type of Summary - sum
Under Evaluate Section:
"Use a Formula":
onfirstrecord or
{Data.ResourceStart} <> previous({Data.ResourceStart}) or
{Data.Resource} <> previous({Data.Resource})
) and
minimum({Data.ApptKind},{Data.ResourceStart}) = 1 AND
maximum({Data.Column},{Data.ResourceStart}) >= '1'
Reset on change of field {Data.Resource}
A little background:My report deals with a Doctors schedule. In the doctors schedule, a appointment is booked and is by default placed into Column 1. It always defaults to Column 1. If the provider elects to double book their time and schedule another patient at the exact same time, the second appointment hits column 2. It expands in essence. It is possible to have up to 4 appointments in one time slot. This is why we wait forever at the Doctors office - appointments get overbooked because patients cancel or no show frequently and the provider would rather have the patients wait then risk no appointment at all. My Client wants the "TOTAL TIME" a provider was "scheduled" to see patients, not the time they actually saw the patients. So if the Provider was scheduled to see patients from 8 am to noon and had patients doublebooked for every time slot, I only want to report the overall time he saw patients regardless of the doublebooking, triplebooking or quadruplebooking. So the total time for my example should be 4 hours not 8 hours. The good news is this is painfully close to being correct! What is currently happening, is if the schedule contains more than 1 facility the time calculates wrong. I think my issue may be in the running Total but not 100% sure. I need it to calculate time on each facility - {Data.Facility}.

Post Author: Jeffs23
CA Forum: Formula
I had some minor issues with my formulas and Running Total so I modified them alittle:
@TotalTime
If {Data.ApptTime} = 0 then 0else {Data.ApptTime}
@Converted Time
If {#RTotal0} = 0 then "--"else ToText(Truncate({#RTotal0}/60),0,"") + " Hour(s), " + ToText(Remainder({#RTotal0},60),0,"") + " Min(s)"
My running total stayed the same.......
Field to Summarize - @TotalTime Type of Summary - sum Under Evaluate Section: "Use a Formula":(onfirstrecord or{Data.ResourceStart} <> previous({Data.ResourceStart}) or{Data.Resource} <> previous({Data.Resource}) ) andminimum({Data.ApptKind},{Data.ResourceStart}) = 1 AND maximum({Data.Column},{Data.ResourceStart}) >= '1' Reset on change of field {Data.Resource}
Some fake sample data:
Resource = Francis, William MD
Facility 1: River Oaks Main Clinic
Facility 2: Western Medical Hospital
Date of Service = 10/25/2007
From 7:15 am to 11:45 am, Patients were treated at Facility 1: River Oaks Main Clinic *** (total time = 4 hours 30 min)
From 12:15 pm to 1:00 pm, Patients were treated at Facility 2: Western Medical Hospital *** (total time = 45 min)
From 1:00 pm to 3:15 pm, Patients were treated at Facility 1: River Oaks Main Clinic *** (total time = 2 Hours 15 min)
The report should tell me Total time at River Oaks Main Clinic = 6 Hours 45 min and 45 min for Western Medical Hospital. What it currently is doing, is reporting the 6 Hours 45 min on the River Oaks Main Clinic and 7 Hours 30 min on the Western Medical Hospital. The time for this facility should be 45 minutes, yet its taking the full provider time and throwing it into this second facility. I am assuming its because the Running total tells it "Reset on change of field {Data.Resource}". Somehow, I need it to evaluate on both the Resource and the Facility. Any suggestions?

Issue with Reports using costume measures - BPC 10.0 NW

Hello BPC Colleagues,
I’m having a problem with some BPC reports using costume measures and I would like to have your inputs about this issue.
When all the reports are executed using a costume measures the report execution fails after a long time of execution (7min). The report has 1200 accounts and 57 company codes.
In order to create trial balance we create these costume measure. Basically the measures are standars (with a few changes) and it works for limited reports (few account and companies) but we I try to executed for several accounts and companies I have the following error:
“The execution of report Default Report failed. Please contact your administrator.”
Error while communicating with the server
Framework message:
The underlying connection was close: An unexpected error occurred on a receive.
Summary of the BPC LOG:
|An error occurred while receiving the HTTP response to https://BPCENV.APPSET.MODEL. This could be due to the service endpoint binding not using the HTTP protocol. This could also be due to an HTTP request context being aborted by the server (possibly due to the service shutting down). See server logs for more details.#
We already increased the PSAPTEMP table and this didn’t fix the issue. At the beginning we were sure that this was an issue with table space but the error persist.
I don’t think (maybe I’m wrong) that this is not an issue related to the costume measure or to authorizations since I can retrieve data if I reduce the request to less accounts an company, so in my point of view this looks like a performance issue.
Just for you, below you will find the details about our measure that generate the problem:
'IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="INC",SUM(PERIODSTODATE([%TIME%].[%TIMEYEARLEVEL%], [%TIME%].CURRENTMEMBER), [MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA]),
IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="EXP",SUM(PERIODSTODATE([%TIME%].[%TIMEYEARLEVEL%],[%TIME%].CURRENTMEMBER),[MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA]),
IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="AST",([MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA],CLOSINGPERIOD([%TIME%].[%TIMEBASELEVEL%])),
IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="LEQ",([MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA], CLOSINGPERIOD([%TIME%].[%TIMEBASELEVEL%])),[MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA]))))';SOLVE_ORDER=3
Finally is important to mention that we are using BPC 10.0 NW (SP08)
If you have any suggestion for me I will appreciate.
Thanks you a lot!

Hi Vadim,
Once again, thanks for your help.
We already modified the YTD standard measure but is with that measure that I have problem. Do you think that my new formula is not efficient and for that reason I’m having this problem? Is this correct?.
Below you will find the standard and costume measure. In red I marked the difference between these 2 formulas:
YEAR TO DATE CUSTOME MESURE:
'IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="INC",SUM(PERIODSTODATE([%TIME%].[%TIMEYEARLEVEL%], [%TIME%].CURRENTMEMBER), [MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA]),
IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="EXP",SUM(PERIODSTODATE([%TIME%].[%TIMEYEARLEVEL%],[%TIME%].CURRENTMEMBER),[MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA]),
IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="AST",([MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA],CLOSINGPERIOD([%TIME%].[%TIMEBASELEVEL%])),
IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="LEQ",([MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA], CLOSINGPERIOD([%TIME%].[%TIMEBASELEVEL%])),[MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA]))))';SOLVE_ORDER=3
YEAR TO DATE STANDAR MEASURE:
'IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="INC",SUM(PERIODSTODATE([%TIME%].[%TIMEYEARLEVEL%], [%TIME%].CURRENTMEMBER),-[MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA]),
IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="EXP",SUM(PERIODSTODATE([%TIME%].[%TIMEYEARLEVEL%],[%TIME%].CURRENTMEMBER),[MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA]),
IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="AST",([MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA], CLOSINGPERIOD([%TIME%].[%TIMEBASELEVEL%])),
IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="LEQ",-([MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA], CLOSINGPERIOD([%TIME%].[%TIMEBASELEVEL%])),-[MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA]))))';SOLVE_ORDER=3
If you have any suggestion to correct my formula I would really appreciate it.
Regards,

BW 3.5 - Issue with formula variable with replacement path

Dear experts,
I'm facing an issue with formula variable with replacement path.
Just to clarify, I know replacement paths is raising a lot of questions but I've been using this functionnality extensively in the past, both in 7.0 and 3.5, so I'm not looking for basic information about how to use it.
I'm trying to setup a simple report that would show total values per plant of Purchase Order < 100
To do so I've setup a calculated key figure as follow:
VAR1 * ("PO value" < 100 ) * "PO value"
VAR1 is a formula variable with replacement path on 'purchase order' and value attribute 'constant =1'.
(The report has to show values summarized by plant but should not show the detail PO by PO, so I'm not looking at a solution based on condition)
The report as characteristic "plant" in rows and my CKF in columns.
Now let's take an example. I have 3 POs in Plant 1:
PO1 -> 150
PO2 -> 90
PO3 -> 80
Because of the variable with replacement path, the result in my query should be:
plant1 = 170 (even though characteristic "purchase order" is not in my rows, system should evaluate PO one by one and return values only for those two that are below 100).
But the result coming is 320, which is wrong.
I've done the same report on many other 3.5 systems and it worked perfectly, and I am not able to get proper support from SAP OSS who keep saying that this functionnality is not ready in 3.5 (although I've provided screenshot of this working on another 3.5 system!!! how frustrating...)
They have also pointed to problems of Before and After aggregation but that has absolutely no impact. Once again, the scenario is working perfectly on other 3.5 systems with the same query design, so i'm sure it has nothing to do with Query Designer options.
Would anyone have ever come to an equivalenet problem? I'm wondering whether the DB itself could not play a role in the variable with ref characteristic 'constant =1' ...
Any though is welcome!
thanks

Hi,
The text variable is replaced when the exact date is clear for this key figure column according to the restriction.
To achive this, please make sure that either the variable is directly restricted in the key figure selection, or that the date characteristic is in drilldown.
Regards,
Patricia

Issue with formula collision

Hello Experts,
I am facing an issue with Formula collision, below is an expample
My requirement is to use Column formula for the value (????) in the below table.
                              Restriction (C1)     Restriction (C2)     Formula(C1-C2)
Restriction (R1)     4              2                                 2
Restriction (R2)     8              3                                 5
Formula(R1+R2)     12              5                              ????
I have tried using the below settings
1) Formula(R1+R2) "Standard"
2) Formula(C1-C2) " Use result of this formula"
But still getting row formula being used, please advice.
Thanks,

Select the Formula which you created Formula(C1-C2)
In the properties tab Go to Calculations--> Select the Check Box Cumulated
In the Drop Down for Calculation Direction Select --> Calculate Along Columns
If you require you can also select the Check Box Also Apply to Results
Hope it Helps.
rgds, Ghuru

PO outbound IDOC - Issue with Unit of measure

Hi,
I am facing issue with unit of measure.
1) In the PO outbound idoc in segment E1EDP01, the unit is always converted into ISO code and sent. Is there any way to avoid it.
2) Now while changing unit to ISO code, it checks if it is preset in T006 table. Now in some of the cases like Unit FT3, there are no entries in T006 table, hence IDOC is going into error. Let me know how can this be resolved. Do I need to update T006 table if yes then how can I do it.
Thanks.
Regards,
Shahu

Sorry.. Posting it in ABAP Development forum.

Issue with Measure formula

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for