Issue with formula collision

Hello Experts,
I am facing an issue with Formula collision, below is an expample
My requirement is to use Column formula for the value (????) in the below table.
                              Restriction (C1)     Restriction (C2)     Formula(C1-C2)
Restriction (R1)     4              2                                 2
Restriction (R2)     8              3                                 5
Formula(R1+R2)     12              5                              ????
I have tried using the below settings
1) Formula(R1+R2) "Standard"
2) Formula(C1-C2) " Use result of this formula"
But still getting row formula being used, please advice.
Thanks,

Select the Formula which you created Formula(C1-C2)
In the properties tab Go to Calculations--> Select the Check Box Cumulated
In the Drop Down for Calculation Direction Select --> Calculate Along Columns
If you require you can also select the Check Box Also Apply to Results
Hope it Helps.
rgds, Ghuru

Similar Messages

BW 3.5 - Issue with formula variable with replacement path

Dear experts,
I'm facing an issue with formula variable with replacement path.
Just to clarify, I know replacement paths is raising a lot of questions but I've been using this functionnality extensively in the past, both in 7.0 and 3.5, so I'm not looking for basic information about how to use it.
I'm trying to setup a simple report that would show total values per plant of Purchase Order < 100
To do so I've setup a calculated key figure as follow:
VAR1 * ("PO value" < 100 ) * "PO value"
VAR1 is a formula variable with replacement path on 'purchase order' and value attribute 'constant =1'.
(The report has to show values summarized by plant but should not show the detail PO by PO, so I'm not looking at a solution based on condition)
The report as characteristic "plant" in rows and my CKF in columns.
Now let's take an example. I have 3 POs in Plant 1:
PO1 -> 150
PO2 -> 90
PO3 -> 80
Because of the variable with replacement path, the result in my query should be:
plant1 = 170 (even though characteristic "purchase order" is not in my rows, system should evaluate PO one by one and return values only for those two that are below 100).
But the result coming is 320, which is wrong.
I've done the same report on many other 3.5 systems and it worked perfectly, and I am not able to get proper support from SAP OSS who keep saying that this functionnality is not ready in 3.5 (although I've provided screenshot of this working on another 3.5 system!!! how frustrating...)
They have also pointed to problems of Before and After aggregation but that has absolutely no impact. Once again, the scenario is working perfectly on other 3.5 systems with the same query design, so i'm sure it has nothing to do with Query Designer options.
Would anyone have ever come to an equivalenet problem? I'm wondering whether the DB itself could not play a role in the variable with ref characteristic 'constant =1' ...
Any though is welcome!
thanks

Hi,
The text variable is replaced when the exact date is clear for this key figure column according to the restriction.
To achive this, please make sure that either the variable is directly restricted in the key figure selection, or that the date characteristic is in drilldown.
Regards,
Patricia

Issue with Formula on Brand Family Level

Hi Friends,
we are facing issue with the formula while showing the report output.
Following is the scenario.
BrandFamily(Char),Material(Char),Comp(Char), Kf1(Keyfig) ,Kf2(Keyfig)
Data Records:
1st Record -
>    B1, M1, 200, 100
2nd Record -
>    B1, M2, 500, 400
3rd Record -
>   B2, M3, 100, 300
4th Record -
>   B2, M4, 600, 200
Formual --> If Kf1>Kf2 then Kf1 Elseif Kf1<Kf2 then Kf2
1) Report displayed based on the BrandFamily and Material , then the report shows correctly as below
Report Structure :- Brandfamily , Material are in Rows and the Colum has the Formula (that was mentioned above)
Report Output :-
B1 M1 200
B1 M2 500
B2 M3 300
B2 M4 600
On Summing , For B1 , Value is 700. For B2, Value is 900.
2) 1) Report displayed based on the BrandFamily , then the report shows wrongly for the formula value as shown below
Report Structure :- Brand Family is in Rows and the Colum has the Formula (that was mentioned above)
Report Output:-
B1 700
B2 700
      Here For B1, Value is 700 which is matching with the earlier output
Whereas For B2, Value is 700 which is not matching with the earlier output.
The Value for B2 is wrong because the formula has not processed correctly the 3rd record .
The report summed up the 3rd and 4th records and then applied the formula , because of which the issue.
This is because the Values kf1 and Kf2 are based on the material and as the material is not part of the Rows .
Thankyou in advance.
LNV

a more simpler solution.
open the kf in edit mode which has the condition
create two formula variables as follows.
BRANDFAMILY
replacement path , reference characteristic brand famility
got replacement path tab-> replacevaue with as ' infobject' replace with as 'attribute value' , attribute constant 1.
MATERIAL
replacement path , reference characteristic material.
got replacement path tab-> replacevaue with as ' infobject' replace with as 'attribute value' , attribute constant 1.
MODIFY the KF as
BRANDFAMILY * MATERIAL * condition.
had exactly same requirement

Issue with Member Formula written for Balance Type

Folks,
I am facing an issue with a member formula written for a balance type dimension,
The code says
IIF( IsUda([Accounts].CurrentMember, "BalanceSheet"),
CASE
*WHEN IS([Time].currentmember,[YearTotal]) THEN MISSING*
WHEN IsLevel([Time].CurrentMember, 0) THEN (BALTYPE.[EndOfPeriod])
WHEN IS([Time].currentmember,[Q1]) THEN (BALTYPE.[EndOfPeriod],Time.[MAR])
WHEN IS([Time].currentmember,[Q2]) THEN (BALTYPE.[EndOfPeriod],Time.[JUN])
WHEN IS([Time].currentmember,[Q3]) THEN (BALTYPE.[EndOfPeriod],Time.[SEP])
WHEN IS([Time].currentmember,[Q4]) THEN (BALTYPE.[EndOfPeriod],Time.[DEC])
END
,MISSING)
Outline Structure for Time dimension looks like below
+Time
--|+YearTotal
------|+Q1
----------|+Jan
----------|+Feb
----------|+Mar
The highlighted Part of the code works good for all the Measures which is With the UDA tag BalanceSheet, Except if the Measure with BalanceSheet UDA is a Parent Member.
Parent Level Measures are populated with Data(populating Dec Data) instead of showing #MISSING.
Any help on this issue will be appreciated.
Thanks
Sathish

Hello Gurus,
I raised an SR with Oracle support and they have replied by saying that, In EPM 11.1.2.4, the IE11 is only supported for interactive reporting and we will have to use IE 10 & 9 for workspace.
Yes. It works fine in IE 10 & 9.
Thanks,
Siva

Issue with Measure formula

Hello friends,
I am having an issue with the following MDX script. I have separated out all the IIF Conditions to make it easy to read. This is a periodic measusre.Liability, income and expense accounts appear just fine. However Asset accounts' 2011.Q3 and 2010.total values are just blank. please advise.
IIF ([%ACCOUNTDIM%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("ACCTYPE")="INC",
-MEASURES.[SIGNEDDATA],
IIF([%ACCOUNTDIM%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("ACCTYPE")="EXP",
MEASURES.[SIGNEDDATA],
IIF([%ACCOUNTDIM%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("ACCTYPE")="AST" AND [DATASRC].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("ID")="CTA",
MEASURES.[SIGNEDDATA],
IIF([%ACCOUNTDIM%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("ACCTYPE")="AST",
(MEASURES.[SIGNEDDATA],CLOSINGPERIOD([%TIMEDIM%].[%TIMEBASELEVEL%])),IIF([%ACCOUNTDIM%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("ACCTYPE")="LEQ",
-(MEASURES.[SIGNEDDATA],CLOSINGPERIOD([%TIMEDIM%].[%TIMEBASELEVEL%])),
-MEASURES.[SIGNEDDATA])))))

Yes ZalakT . You are correct . I tried same and its retrieving blank when specified DATASRC or any dimension with ID comparison in measure formula .ie DATASRC.CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("ID")="CTA" or %ACCOUNTDIM%.CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("ID")="xxxx" .
I tried following way and it retrieved periodic totals for asset accounts . ie for 2011.TOTAL & 2011.Q1 its retrieving total of base months instead of closing period's value for asset accounts .
1) don't not change PERIODIC measure formula .
2) Add FORMULA property to DATASRC .Add new member CTA_CALC to DATASRC . In formula property of CTA_CALC specify
IIF([ACCOUNT].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("ACCTYPE")="AST",[MEASURES].[SIGNEDDATA],[DATASRC].[CTA])
3) save some data in (CTA,PERIODIC) for both Asset & non Asset accounts . Retrieve same data from CTA_CALC .
let me know if it works .

Urgent !Formula Collision

Hi guys,
This is critical i gotta deliver this issue fast
the thing is i have two structures one KF the other chars, formulas
having to do with YTD (year-to-date) calculations,
and i'm having some formula collisions
that is some formulas are incorrect
eg (Gross margin %A Net Invoicing) for
a characteristic (a current year) is wrongly calculated
similar is the scenario for other formula in the char structures
is there a formula collision do i need to use cell editor
the two structures are in colums
Thanks

I checked the KF and it has "result from this formula "
so the error could be something else i believe
no cell editor was used in this case
i think probably we need to use cell editor to
calculate the complex formula, could that be the error
help me out guys

FR Studio - Is there a workaround for the issue with referencing data from a grid with a different DB connection and different # of dimensions?

Hi,
I am trying to reference a column in a different grid with a different database connection. I did some research in the forums, and it seems like this is a known issue with FR Studio. The issue is that if the 2 different database connections have different # of dimensions, then the reference will throw an error.
For example, what I'm trying to do is below:
In grid2.column[A], I have the following formula:
grid1.column[A]
The result is an error.
The ultimate goal is to have a basic variance formula in the grid between grid1 and grid2, which have different database connections with a different # of dimensions. Is there a workaround at all to this bug? The example of the basic formula is below:
grid1.column[A] - grid2.column[A]
Any help is much appreciated!
Thanks,
Tiffany

Thanks for the detailed response Mike.
The issue with trying it in Grid1 vs Grid2 is that Grid1's DB connection has more dimensions than Grid2's DB connection. I can't change the DB connection to a database with more dimensions because you have to be able to map all dimensions from the existing DB connection (Grid1) to the new DB connection (Grid2). This isn't possible, so instead I have to map Grid2 (less dimensions) to Grid1 (more dimensions). It just ignores the extra dimensions from Grid1. Does that make sense?
Thanks again for your responses. It's very much appreciated.
Tiffany

Issue with Reports using costume measures - BPC 10.0 NW

Hello BPC Colleagues,
I’m having a problem with some BPC reports using costume measures and I would like to have your inputs about this issue.
When all the reports are executed using a costume measures the report execution fails after a long time of execution (7min). The report has 1200 accounts and 57 company codes.
In order to create trial balance we create these costume measure. Basically the measures are standars (with a few changes) and it works for limited reports (few account and companies) but we I try to executed for several accounts and companies I have the following error:
“The execution of report Default Report failed. Please contact your administrator.”
Error while communicating with the server
Framework message:
The underlying connection was close: An unexpected error occurred on a receive.
Summary of the BPC LOG:
|An error occurred while receiving the HTTP response to https://BPCENV.APPSET.MODEL. This could be due to the service endpoint binding not using the HTTP protocol. This could also be due to an HTTP request context being aborted by the server (possibly due to the service shutting down). See server logs for more details.#
We already increased the PSAPTEMP table and this didn’t fix the issue. At the beginning we were sure that this was an issue with table space but the error persist.
I don’t think (maybe I’m wrong) that this is not an issue related to the costume measure or to authorizations since I can retrieve data if I reduce the request to less accounts an company, so in my point of view this looks like a performance issue.
Just for you, below you will find the details about our measure that generate the problem:
'IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="INC",SUM(PERIODSTODATE([%TIME%].[%TIMEYEARLEVEL%], [%TIME%].CURRENTMEMBER), [MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA]),
IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="EXP",SUM(PERIODSTODATE([%TIME%].[%TIMEYEARLEVEL%],[%TIME%].CURRENTMEMBER),[MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA]),
IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="AST",([MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA],CLOSINGPERIOD([%TIME%].[%TIMEBASELEVEL%])),
IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="LEQ",([MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA], CLOSINGPERIOD([%TIME%].[%TIMEBASELEVEL%])),[MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA]))))';SOLVE_ORDER=3
Finally is important to mention that we are using BPC 10.0 NW (SP08)
If you have any suggestion for me I will appreciate.
Thanks you a lot!

Hi Vadim,
Once again, thanks for your help.
We already modified the YTD standard measure but is with that measure that I have problem. Do you think that my new formula is not efficient and for that reason I’m having this problem? Is this correct?.
Below you will find the standard and costume measure. In red I marked the difference between these 2 formulas:
YEAR TO DATE CUSTOME MESURE:
'IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="INC",SUM(PERIODSTODATE([%TIME%].[%TIMEYEARLEVEL%], [%TIME%].CURRENTMEMBER), [MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA]),
IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="EXP",SUM(PERIODSTODATE([%TIME%].[%TIMEYEARLEVEL%],[%TIME%].CURRENTMEMBER),[MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA]),
IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="AST",([MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA],CLOSINGPERIOD([%TIME%].[%TIMEBASELEVEL%])),
IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="LEQ",([MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA], CLOSINGPERIOD([%TIME%].[%TIMEBASELEVEL%])),[MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA]))))';SOLVE_ORDER=3
YEAR TO DATE STANDAR MEASURE:
'IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="INC",SUM(PERIODSTODATE([%TIME%].[%TIMEYEARLEVEL%], [%TIME%].CURRENTMEMBER),-[MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA]),
IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="EXP",SUM(PERIODSTODATE([%TIME%].[%TIMEYEARLEVEL%],[%TIME%].CURRENTMEMBER),[MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA]),
IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="AST",([MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA], CLOSINGPERIOD([%TIME%].[%TIMEBASELEVEL%])),
IIF([%ACCOUNT%].CURRENTMEMBER.PROPERTIES("2/CPMB/ACCTYPE")="LEQ",-([MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA], CLOSINGPERIOD([%TIME%].[%TIMEBASELEVEL%])),-[MEASURES].[/CPMB/SDATA]))))';SOLVE_ORDER=3
If you have any suggestion to correct my formula I would really appreciate it.
Regards,

Issue with Hierarchy selection in Filter area

Hi experts,
We have an issue with BEx query selection.
Structure of Quey
1. Filter Area
=> Characteristic Relations : Restriction condition with hierarchy
2. Rows
=> Display characteristic with hierarchy active
3.Columns
=> Formula with keyfigure using sign reverse of hierarchy (formula variance).
<symptom >
When I use context menu, "Keep filter value", with the displayed hierarchy node,
and drilldown with other characteristics, the result became wrong. Filter value I kept became inactive.
Workaround I found was like belows.
1. Remove sign reverse calculation in Formula.
2. Keep sign reverse calculation and move restriction condition with hierarchy in filter area TO default values.
I wonder this symptom was right technically or bug ocurred after version upgrade or something.
Thanks in advance.
BEx BI Addon 7.X(based on 710)/SP11 Revision 634

Hi
This depends on the logical database that the report is based on. Secondly I have experienced that the report variant overwrites the date selections and therefore it looks like that the dates are not parsed (which I think is your problem).
For e.g. logical PHP and PHPCE both the period and data dates are filled with the data selection from the portal. (check on the report attributes in SE38 which logical DB used) For e.g. PTRVP (travel) no date are passed at all in the call of the report!!
To make sure that the report variant isnu2019t overwriting I normally set the variant for the report to u201CSave field without valuesu201D for the date selection periods and then it isnu2019t filled by the variant.
Data selection period
Data selection period: Start
Data selection period: End
Employee selection period
Employee selection period: Start
Employee selection period: End
Regards,
Lars

Issue with Date Format

Hi All,
I m facing an issue with Date format in the prompt. I have used date presentation variables in my column formula as shown below:
FILTER("SKU Order Details"."Fulfilled Quantity" USING Time."Calendar Date" <= DATE '@{todate}{2900-01-01}')
The report returns data when I don't select any date range for start & end date prompts on the page. But when I select the start & end date values in the prompt, I m getting the following error:
Error Codes: OPR4ONWY:U9IM8TAC:OI2DL65P:OI2DL65P
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 46047] Datetime value 10/22/2009 12:00:00 AM from 10/22/2009 12:00:00 AM does not match the specified format. (HY000)
I included the following formulas for start & end date prompts:
Start Date prompt: case when 1=2 then License."Ips Creation Date" else cast ('1.1.1900' as date) end
End Date prompt: case when 1=2 then License."Ips Creation Date" else cast ('1.1.2900' as date) end
Can you please help me resolve the issue.
Thanks,
Kartik

Hi Nico,
I tried putting the format that you mentioned, I m getting an error message.
My prompts have the following formula :
Start: case when 1=2 then License."Creation Date" else cast('1.1.1900' as DATE) end
End: case when 1=2 then Time."Calendar Date" else cast('1.1.2900' as DATE) end
My column formula has the following syntax:
FILTER("SKU Order Details"."Fulfilled Quantity" USING Time."Calendar Date" between DATE '@{start}{1900-01-01}' AND DATE '@{end}{2999-01-01}')
Error Message:
Error Codes: OPR4ONWY:U9IM8TAC:OI2DL65P:OI2DL65P
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 46047] Datetime value 11/17/2009 from 11/17/2009 does not match the specified format. (HY000)
Can you please let me know if something needs to be changed.
Thanks,
Kartik

Issues with Decimals

I have an issue with decimals in calculation : -
Data : G_SUM TYPE p DECIMALS 2.
   KOMV-KBETR = 2.00 (KBETR TYPE IS P(6) Decimal 2)
   WG_A650-ZZBILL_QUNT = 10.00 (ZZBILL_QUNT Type is P(7) Decimal 3)
        Loop at I_A650 into WG_A650.
             G_SUM = G_SUM + ( KOMV-KBETR * WG_A650-ZZBILL_QUNT ).
        Endloop.
           XKWERT = G_SUM. (XKWERT Type is P(7) Decimal 2)
Form the above calculation : - G_SUM should be 20.00
         But the result is : - 20000.00
To aviod this i changed the declartion of G_SUM as below : -
Data : G_SUM TYPE p DECIMALS 5.
Now it is calculating correctly but i need to assign this value to a another field.
      Its data type is (TYPE p DECIMALS 2)
Now the result is again changed to 20000.00
Any sugesstion to fix this issue will be apprecaiated.
Regards,
Kittu

Hi Florian Kemmer,
Thank you for your quick response!
It is my mistake, i could have explained in more efficient manner.
The below values are from Internal table only and it has only 1 record.
KOMV-KBETR = 2.00
   WG_A650-ZZBILL_QUNT = 10.00
(G_SUM = G_SUM + ( KOMV-KBETR * WG_A650-ZZBILL_QUNT ).)
After the above formula is executed it shoudl display the value as 20.00
Due to issues with the decimals it is displaying as 20000.00
And the declaration is not exactly done as described...It is just for understanding.
KBETR --> is of type P(6) Decimal 2.
Any suggestion will be appreciated
Regards,
Kittu
Edited by: Kittu on Mar 29, 2010 12:34 PM

Issue with query output

hi there,
I have an issue with the display of hours 00:00:00 in the query output in BW.
The system assumes it as 0 or blank and therefore display it under unassigned hour.
I am using the reference of 0TIME for this hourly display.
When I checked the 0TIME i could not find the corresponding SID value for 00:00:00 hours.
Can anybody please advise what needs to be done?
Thanks in advance,
Kind regard,
Kate

Hi Kate,
I am experiencing the same problem as you: an InfoObject, created referencing 0TIME, represented in the BEX Query as "#" when the Value is "00:00:00".
How did you work it out?
The Formula Variable strategy is not applicable in this case because 0TIME is not a key figure !
Bye
Aldo

Issue with Date Format for Presentation Variables

Hi,
I am using dashboard prompts to capture begin date and end date in presentation variables. The dates selected from calendar are in the format mm/dd/yyyy.
In Asnwers I need to get a count of days between begin and end dates. I am using the column formula as shown:
TIMESTAMPDIFF(SQL_TSI_DAY, DATE '@{pBeginDate}', DATE '@{pEndDate}')
When ever I run the report from dashboard I get the following error:
State: HY000. Code: 10058. [NQODBC] [SQL_STATE: HY000] [nQSError: 10058] A general error has occurred. [nQSError: 46046] Datetime value 1/1/2005 does not match the specified format. (HY000)
SQL Issued: {call NQSGetQueryColumnInfo('SELECT "Transaction Dates"."Transaction Date", TIMESTAMPDIFF(SQL_TSI_DAY, DATE ''1/1/2005'', DATE ''1/2/2006'' FROM "Dates"')}
SQL Issued: SELECT "Transaction Dates"."Transaction Date", TIMESTAMPDIFF(SQL_TSI_DAY, DATE '1/1/2005', DATE '1/2/2006') FROM "Dates"
Can anyone help me to reolve this date format issue?
Thanks,
Aravind

Hi,
see this below links
Issues with Prompts calender date
Regards
Naresh

Issue with web part connections : won't display data when the lookup field is a calculated field

Hello,
I have a list A with a calculated field named A.A. I have a list B that has a lookup field to list A, to field A.A, named B.A. I add the two lists in a wiki page and I try to connect them - I.E., select a row from A and the rows from B would be automatically
filtered.
The B\Connections\get filtered values from A and select Provider:A.A, Consumer B.A doesn't bring any results. If I do the exact opposite: A\Connections\get filtered values from B and select Provider:B.A, Consumer A.A works fine. But, this is not what
I want.
If the A.A isn't calculated field, everything works fine. So, it looks like there's an issue with calculated fields acting as consumers.
Is this a known issue and are there any know workarounds? A workaround is to abandon calculated field and use sharepoint designer workflow.
Thank you
Christos

Hi,
According to your post, my understanding is that you had issues about connecting web parts.
I try to reproduce the issue, however, everything works well.
Create a custom list named List A, add a caculated column named A.A(Formula: =Title).
Create a custom list named List B, add a lookup column named B.A(List A: A.A).
Create a page and then insert the two list view web parts.
Edit page, select List B->Connections->Get Filtered Values From List A.
Then I can filter the List B.
I recommend to create another caculated column and get filter value form it to check whether it works.
Best Regards,
Linda Li
Linda Li
TechNet Community Support

Suppress Missing Data not work in web form with formula column inside

Dear All,
I've a planning web form with formula column inside to calculate the variance and % variance. But missing cell can't be suppressed, although I've checked the 'Suppress Missing Blocks' and 'Suppress Missing Data' options.
Anyone have face the same problem..?? and how to fixed it..??
thanks.
Regards,
VieN

There is a known issue that sounds like the problem you are experiencing
10358200 - If a formula column exists in a data form, selecting the Suppress missing option does not hide rows that do not contain data.
Cheers
John
http://john-goodwin.blogspot.com/

Issue with formula collision

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for