Issue with Variants in 2004s

Hi BW Gurus,
We recently upgraded our system from 3.5 and 2004s and we are having issues with variants.
Issue1.
Variants created by one user is not visible by other users
Issue2.
Variants created for workbook is not saved.
Anyone encountered these issues ?
Rgds
Chan

Issue 1:
We created a program that converts the variant from local to global periodically.
This program was provided by sap which was modified and scheduled in the background.
REPORT  Z_2004S_VARIANT_PERS_2_GLOBAL.
*& Report  Z_2004S_VARIANT_PERS_2_GLOBAL
type-pools:
  rs.
parameters:
  2global radiobutton group gr1 default 'X',
  2person radiobutton group gr1.
selection-screen uline /1(83).
parameters:
  p_query like rsrrepdir-genuniid memory id gid,
  p_varnt2 like rsrparametrizat-txtlg memory id zid.
data:
  ls_rsrparametriza type rsrparametriza,
  l_compid type rsrrepdir-compid,
  l_appname type string,
  l_apptype type rsappcompnm value '01',
  lt_catalog type rsr_t_para_catalog,
  lt_return type table of ddshretval,
  ls_return type ddshretval,
  l_paramnm type rsrparametriza-paramnm,
  l_message type string.
F4 Help for parameters
at selection-screen on value-request for p_query.
  call function 'RZ_QUERY_F4_GET'            "3.x
    exporting
      i_objtype  = 'QU'
    importing
      e_genuniid = p_query.
  set parameter id 'GID' field p_query.
at selection-screen on value-request for p_varnt2.
  get parameter id 'GID' field p_query.
  select single compid from  rsrrepdir into l_compid
         where  objvers   = rs_c_objvers-active
         and    genuniid  = p_query.
  l_appname = l_compid.
  call method cl_rsr_para=>get_catalog
    exporting
      i_type      = l_apptype
      i_appnm     = l_appname
    receiving
      r_t_catalog = lt_catalog.
  call function 'F4IF_INT_TABLE_VALUE_REQUEST'
    exporting
      ddic_structure  = space
      retfield        = 'PARAMNM'
      value_org       = 'S'
    tables
      value_tab       = lt_catalog
      return_tab      = lt_return
    exceptions
      parameter_error = 1
      no_values_found = 2
      others          = 3.
  read table lt_return into ls_return index 1.
  select single txtlg from  rsrparametrizat into p_varnt2
         where  langu    = sy-langu
         and    paramnm  = ls_return-fieldval
         and    objvers  = rs_c_objvers-active.
  export ls_return-fieldval to memory id 'PARAMNM'.
  if p_varnt2 is not initial.
    set parameter id 'ZID' field p_varnt2.
  endif.
start-of-selection.
  import ls_return-fieldval from memory id 'PARAMNM'.
  l_paramnm = ls_return-fieldval.
  select single * from  rsrparametriza into ls_rsrparametriza
         where  paramnm  = l_paramnm
         and    objvers  = rs_c_objvers-active.
  if 2global eq rs_c_true.
    clear ls_rsrparametriza-personal.
  elseif 2person eq rs_c_true.
    if ls_rsrparametriza-owner eq sy-uname.
      ls_rsrparametriza-personal = rs_c_true.
    ELSE.
      l_message = 'You cannot make another users variant personal!'.
      message l_message type 'E'.
    endif.
  endif.
  update rsrparametriza from ls_rsrparametriza.
  if sy-subrc eq 0.
    concatenate 'Variant' p_varnt2 'was converted successfully!' into
l_message
      separated by space.
    message l_message type 'S'.
  else.
    l_message = 'Error during conversion!'.
    message l_message type 'E'.
  endif.
  commit work.
Issue 2:
SAP has to release the note yet.
Rgds
Dinesh

Similar Messages

  • I have Snow Leopard 10.6 and I am having issues with M/S Word 2004 and G-mail. I can only open docs sent to me in g-mail on google doc?

    Is there a compatability issue with Microsoft Word 2004 and Snow Leopard or is it G-Mail? I am using Safari with a G-mail account.

    Will upgrading to 2011 correct my issue that I can not open a pdf or word doc in G-mail or could it be a g-mail setting? I can open these docs outside of G-mail, but I am also having issues sending them without the docs becoming slightly modified enroute.

  • Few issues with BI 2004s

    Hello there,
    I am having few issues with BI 2004s system. It’s a new implementation.
    -         When you create Data source using DB connect in new system, it creates with old version. I could see the SMALL square box next to the Data source. I would expect the system to generate new 2004s datasource.
    -         Obviously the generated D/S won’t allow us to create New Transformations. We have to create old transfer rules/update rule. I do see the option to migrate the D/S when I right click on it. But I get short dump when I try that and then you have to discard the D/S and create new one.
    -         Also, it won’t allow you to delete the DBConnect D/S although you have option to do that?
    Anyone has faced these issues?
    Performance issue with reporting:
    I understand that you have to have portal in order to execute reports which we don’t have at this client. They don’t have time and money to invest right now. So we have created reports using BW 3.5 BEx Q.designer/WAD to run the reports on web. The report takes long time when you try to drill down on Material/Customer with only 150,000 records in Cube. The cube has just three dimensions (two char each) and 4 key figures. Any suggestion to improve?
    Thanks
    Sudhakar

    Yes, I noticed it too and was thinking the same thing, blueaura.
    I'm sure they want to ensure the scan is reliable. I keep my screen at a lower brightness to save power, and sometimes Starbucks scanners take a bit longer for it to register.
    2) is already fixed.
    3) is a feature, not a bug. If you are updating an app you already have installed, it doesn't bother to ask you for the password. Nice!
    For Google maps, just use maps.google.com in the browser.

  • Issue with update of BOM by Variant Config - Cost relevant indicator

    Hi All VC Expert,
    We are facing an issue with the update by reference characteristic of the field STPO-SANKA Cost relevancy indicator on the BOM.
    We are on SAP ECC 6.0 release 700 on Oracle
    Hot Package
    - SAPKA70015 on ERP Cross Application componenent
    - SAPKH60013 on SAP-APPL Logistics and accouting
    We are using material variant
    We are on the first level of configuration
    Classically, we built a procedure to set X to this data base field as below :
    $self.STPO_SANKA = 'X'
    We assigned this procedure to the relevant items
    Here is the result we have:
    At the creation of the Plan Order, this is not working
    At the creation of the Prod Order, this is not working
    When we do a Reload PP master data, this is working very well
    On CU50/VA02 when we check the trace, the procedure is executed.
    Do somebody have an idea or already facing this and solve it ?
    Thanks in advance for your appreciated help.

    Hi Fabien. Did you solve your problem?

  • Compatibility issues with Mac OSX Leopard 10.5 and Word 2004 11.6.3 on G5 PowerMac?

    Are there compatibility issues with Mac OSX Leopard V. 10.5 and Word 2004 11.6.3 when installed on a PowerMac G5? I understand the Leopard upgrade is okay on the later Intel Mac, but what about my G5 PowerPC Mac?

    I do not use Microsoft Excel much but when i do use it it works fine on my G5. my powerbook has excel to but sometimes freezes on the powerbook. but not the G5 so give it a try you can always uninstall it if it does not work good
    anitabean wrote:
    Thanks so much for your positive reply! Are you a big user of Excel? That's where I've heard people have had trouble, with cells locking up and so on.
    Crossing my fingers and loading Leopard....
    Cheers.

  • K8T Neo2 issues with 2004/9/24 Bios

    Hi there.
    I´ve upgraded my k8T Neo2 with the 2004/9/24 an am having now stability issues with my FX 53 due to inproper fan speed control.
    I have no clue how the fan control works in this Mobo because my observations are really strange. The CPU is now always reaching 70 C and more under load and the fan control seems not to be able to get it keeped cooler. Tried several CPU coolers but it´s always the same.
    If my case is closed, the fan control seems to work and is incrasing the RPMs of my coolers, but having the case opened the RPMs stay at the same level like on Idle.
    However, in both situations the temperature is growing up to 70C and more which results in instabilities at this high temps.
    So before you ask me. I´ve of course upgraded to the latest Core Center too, but it´s the same if it´s either loaded or not, so it´s the Bios if you ask me.
    Also, had not these troubles with the previous Bios.
    All I can say now is that the fan speed isn´t regulated by the CPU temperatutre but something else and it´s not calibrated to support hotter running FX CPUs, though the previous Bios obviously was.
    Last but not least, Cool´n Quiet is also working now under Win2k, but the Legacy USB support isn´t completely fixed.
    I can´t boot neither Win2k nor WInXP with it enabled.

    The system was set up last week, so everything is up to date, also the AMD drivers.
    However, the Bios date code is in the topic header  (2004/9/24).
    It was updated yesterday and since then the CPU isn´t cooled correctly, neither with the Boxed Cooler, nor a Thermaltake Silent Boost or a Zalman CNPS-7000B. No matter the case is closed or opened.
    There is also no problem with the Cool´n Quiet driver or the Cool´n Quiet support anymore. There was just a problem under Win2k and the Bios the Mobo came with, but that´s fixed now with the newest Bios, exept the fan control that is working now incorrectly.
    Don´t remember right now the date code of the previous Bios, but it was the first release and there the fan control worked correctly, so my Athlon 64 FX 53 didn´t heat up as much as now and got no stability problems, simply because it was always kept below the 70ties.
    I don´t think the rest of my rig is of any importance because connecting the coolers to an other surce than the CPU FAN Header and so running them at full speed, doesn´t cause my CPU to become unstable as it doesn´t reach this high temperatures.
    That´s the only problem I´m having now. Everything else is rock stable and up to date.
    What´s about the Leagcy USB support not allowing me to boot the OS´s, I can live with that though it would be nice to get that fixed too.
    So to be more specific. With the previous Bios the fan control kicked in earlier,  way before the temperature reached 70C. Now it kicks in much later. Somwhere in the middle of the 70ties. To late for my FX 53.
    So to speak with the previous Bios the fan control kicked in before the CPU reached the critical temperature and incrased the RPMs at least so far, that the CPU was cooled down to the 60ies. Now it´s just keeping the temperature at the reached level (73-74C ).
    All I want is to get this fixed or even better to add an option into the Bios to select the temperature where the fan control kicks in and incrases the fan speed to keep the CPU temperature at the level you selected.

  • Version incompatibility issue with Interop.SAPbobsCOM.dll in SBO 2004

    Hi,
    I have encountered an incompatibility issue in DI API 2004 across different patch level-versions. Originally, I developed an application in SBO 2004 pl4 environment. Now, some of the customers who were installing the application, notified me that the application has a login problem. It turned out that the CompanyClass.connect() method returns an error message "object reference not set to an instance of an object", when the DI API version installed in the production environment is higher (in this case, pl7) than the DI API version which was used in the development environment.
    I figured out that the problem can be fixed by replacing the Interop.SAPbobsCOM.dll file in the application directory by a newer version that reflects the DI API that is installed in the system. However, it seems a rather lousy workaround, if the customer needs to manually replace the dll. Maybe the installer could be customized to "sniff" the correct DI API level, but this too would be a pretty kludgy solution.
    Does anyone know a better solution to this problem ?
    Regards,
    Henry

    normally this is not a problem as long as they don't change the signatures on the DI-API (which they said they wouldn't) but it appears in P5 they changed that signature... we noticed some enums that got added and a few minor changes.

  • Microsoft Entourage 2004 issues with MacBook Pro's??

    Hi all,
    I only post this question, cause I have three macbook pro's at my company having the same issue, and all the other intel based macs, behaving fine.
    We have been experiencing very unstable behavior with Microsoft Entourage specifically on MacBook Pros. One users loses the ability to click on anything within Entourage, until he reboots his machine. Another couple of users ran into similar issue with not being able to open entourage without error messages. Is their something specifically in the Macbook Pros that cause Entourage to run bad in the Rosetta engine? My Black Macbook works fine with Office and so does our Intel iMacs. Any ideas why these issues revolve around Macbook Pros specifically? Any other users having problems?

    Hi all,
    I only post this question, cause I have three macbook
    pro's at my company having the same issue, and all
    the other intel based macs, behaving fine.
    We have been experiencing very unstable behavior with
    Microsoft Entourage specifically on MacBook Pros.
    One users loses the ability to click on anything
    within Entourage, until he reboots his machine.
    Another couple of users ran into similar issue with
    not being able to open entourage without error
    messages. Is their something specifically in the
    Macbook Pros that cause Entourage to run bad in the
    Rosetta engine? My Black Macbook works fine with
    Office and so does our Intel iMacs. Any ideas why
    these issues revolve around Macbook Pros
    specifically? Any other users having problems?
    I have seen strange behavior as well on not my MBP but my Mac Pro...
    I have applied all updates.
    William

  • Issue with PTO (Paid Time Off) quota generation

    Hi All,
    We have an issue with quota generation of PTO for our employees.
    The issue goes like this:
    We have a Paid time off for employees 5weeks( 200 hrs) for employees who have worked less than 5 years.
    we have  paid time off for employees 6 weeks ( 240 hrs) for employees who have worked more than 5 years.
    we have the following logic that has to go in this config:
    -- Our fiscal year starts on Feb 1st and ends on Jan end or Feb starts which has a full week of working days. ( ex: if 01/31/2012 falls on a Thursday the following Monday which has full 5 day working week would be the end of the fiscal year).
    -- Depending on the working hours of  the employees and the date of joining for the first year ( for new hires)0041 info type the eligibility gets varied and reduced. Ex( employees who joins on start of fiscal year and works 40hrs per week schedules is eligible for 200hrs of PTO. Employees who join in the month of august and works for 35 hrs per week ( i.e mid of fiscal year) would get 91 hrs of PTO.
    I need to put this in the system. I am thinking this could be done with out tweaking PCR.I need help in configuring this in Absence quotas as to what are the things i need change in system config and how do i do it. Please help with some screen shots if possible.  I really need this to get it done ASAP. Looking forward for help.
    Thanks,
    Chowdary.

    We use TM00 schema. Can i call TS15 and TS 12  rules into TM00 acheieve my issue of quota entilements?
    Iam doing this because my businees needs to see if an employee chages his work schedule from 40 to 30 or 20 etc.. the PTO has to vary accordingly.
    As the minimum eligibility is to work for 20 hrs to avail the PTO days. If at any point the employee drops it under 20 he will not be eligible till he work any this >= 20hrs per month so the evaluation has to check periodically to update the quota availability.... I need help plz suggest ...

  • Issue with Ord Start Date

    Hi,
    I am having issue with Ord Start Date.
    When i create XYZ Asset now when i do the acquasation for that new asset. Example: Using FB01 i enter todays date and i do the posting.
    Now when i go to DEP Area TAB for the DEP Key (M200) - The Ord Dep Start Date is 15 Dec 2010.
    For this DEP Key Period Control Methods (T code - AFAMP) - Acquisation Entered is ( 6 that is - at the start of year) and the Period Control is ( T code - OAVS) (4 that is - First year convention at half year start date).
    Our client is using the fiscal year as 1 June 2010 to 31 May 2011.
    So when i do acquistion for the asset as per the period contol the Ord Dep Start Date should be 1 Dec 2010, but here it is talking 15 Dec 2010.
    Why is system talking 15 days more.
    Regards.

    Hi
    Which Fiscal year variant are you using??
    Did you maintain it in OAVH? Copy the existing entry in OAVH for K4 to your Fisc Yr var and try again
    And also, 04 does not figure for Acquisitions in AFAMP under 0004.... Whatever you specify in OAVH must also be a part of AFAMP
    Regards
    Ajay M
    Edited by: Ajay Maheshwari on Oct 28, 2010 2:31 PM

  • Issues with cisco 1242 aironets

    We are currently experiencing and issue with the 1242 AG Wireless Access Points. We have have them configured as 1 Root Access point and 3 Repeaters. The repeaters seem to be experiencing frequency interference issues. The Root AP is using antenna model 2506 and the repeaters 1728's.
    What happens is when the repeaters are first started up, they see / communicate to the root access point fine, but within 5 minutes they stop communicating. If we manually set the channel to something different, they see each other for 5 - 10 minutes then eventually disappear and cannot be ping'd or seen with a sh cdp nei.
    We have tried various combinations of settings so far. Have tried channel 1 - 13 and the least conjested frequency mode. It usually settles on channel 8 when we put it in that mode. But it is the same sceneario each time. All 3 repeaters show up almost instantly after a channel change, but slowly disappear in less than 10 minutes.
    Here is our config:
    Version
    Cisco IOS Software, C1240 Software (C1240-K9W7-M), Version 12.4(21a)JA1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
    Technical Support: http://www.cisco.com/techsupport
    Copyright (c) 1986-2009 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
    Compiled Wed 16-Sep-09 19:06 by prod_rel_team
    ROM: Bootstrap program is C1240 boot loader
    BOOTLDR: C1240 Boot Loader (C1240-BOOT-M) Version 12.3(7)JA1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
    ROOTAP uptime is 2 days, 3 hours, 14 minutes
    System returned to ROM by power-on
    System image file is "flash:/c1240-k9w7-mx.124-21a.JA1/c1240-k9w7-mx.124-21a.JA1"
    cisco AIR-AP1242AG-E-K9    (PowerPCElvis) processor (revision A0) with 24566K/8192K bytes of memory.
    Processor board ID FCZ112782K9
    PowerPCElvis CPU at 262Mhz, revision number 0x0950
    Last reset from power-on
    1 FastEthernet interface
    2 802.11 Radio(s)
    32K bytes of flash-simulated non-volatile configuration memory.
    Base ethernet MAC Address: 00:1C:58:B1:72:2E
    Part Number                          : 73-10256-06
    PCA Assembly Number                  : 800-26918-05
    PCA Revision Number                  : A0
    PCB Serial Number                    : FOC11262N5Z
    Top Assembly Part Number             : 800-29233-01
    Top Assembly Serial Number           : FCZ112782K9
    Top Revision Number                  : A0
    Product/Model Number                 : AIR-AP1242AG-E-K9
    Configuration register is 0xF
    Root AP Config
    Current configuration : 1987 bytes
    version 12.4
    no service pad
    service timestamps debug datetime msec
    service timestamps log datetime msec
    service password-encryption
    hostname ROOTAP
    no aaa new-model
    dot11 syslog
    dot11 activity-timeout client maximum 120
    dot11 activity-timeout repeater maximum 300
    dot11 ssid WIRELESS
       authentication open
       authentication key-management wpa
       guest-mode
       infrastructure-ssid
    username user privilege 15 secret 5 password
    bridge irb
    interface Dot11Radio0
    no ip address
    no ip route-cache
    encryption mode ciphers tkip
    ssid WIRELESS
    antenna gain 5
    parent timeout 10000
    channel 2417
    station-role root access-point
    bridge-group 1
    bridge-group 1 subscriber-loop-control
    bridge-group 1 block-unknown-source
    no bridge-group 1 source-learning
    no bridge-group 1 unicast-flooding
    bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
    interface Dot11Radio1
    no ip address
    no ip route-cache
    shutdown
    no dfs band block
    channel dfs
    station-role root
    bridge-group 1
    bridge-group 1 subscriber-loop-control
    bridge-group 1 block-unknown-source
    no bridge-group 1 source-learning
    no bridge-group 1 unicast-flooding
    bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
    interface FastEthernet0
    no ip address
    no ip route-cache
    duplex auto
    speed auto
    bridge-group 1
    no bridge-group 1 source-learning
    bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
    interface BVI1
    ip address 192.168.2.10 255.255.255.0
    no ip route-cache
    ip default-gateway 192.168.2.1
    ip http server
    ip http authentication local
    no ip http secure-server
    ip http help-path http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/779/smbiz/prodconfig/help/eag
    bridge 1 route ip
    line con 0
    privilege level 15
    logging synchronous
    login local
    stopbits 1
    line vty 0 4
    privilege level 15
    logging synchronous
    login local
    stopbits 1
    line vty 5 15
    privilege level 15
    logging synchronous
    login local
    stopbits 1
    end
    Repeater Config
    Current configuration : 1764 bytes
    version 12.4
    no service pad
    service timestamps debug datetime msec
    service timestamps log datetime msec
    service password-encryption
    hostname REPEATER03
    no aaa new-model
    dot11 syslog
    dot11 ssid WIRELESS
       authentication open
       authentication key-management wpa
       guest-mode
       infrastructure-ssid
    username user privilege 15 secret 5 password
    bridge irb
    interface Dot11Radio0
    no ip address
    no ip route-cache
    encryption mode ciphers tkip
    ssid WIRELESS
    antenna gain 5
    parent timeout 10000
    station-role repeater
    bridge-group 1
    bridge-group 1 subscriber-loop-control
    bridge-group 1 block-unknown-source
    no bridge-group 1 source-learning
    no bridge-group 1 unicast-flooding
    bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
    interface Dot11Radio1
    no ip address
    no ip route-cache
    shutdown
    no dfs band block
    channel dfs
    station-role root
    bridge-group 1
    bridge-group 1 subscriber-loop-control
    bridge-group 1 block-unknown-source
    no bridge-group 1 source-learning
    no bridge-group 1 unicast-flooding
    bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
    interface FastEthernet0
    no ip address
    no ip route-cache
    duplex auto
    speed auto
    bridge-group 1
    no bridge-group 1 source-learning
    bridge-group 1 spanning-disabled
    interface BVI1
    ip address 192.168.2.13 255.255.255.0
    no ip route-cache
    ip default-gateway 192.168.2.1
    ip http server
    ip http authentication local
    no ip http secure-server
    ip http help-path http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/779/smbiz/prodconfig/help/eag
    bridge 1 route ip
    line con 0
    privilege level 15
    logging synchronous
    login local
    stopbits 1
    line vty 0 4
    privilege level 15
    logging synchronous
    login local
    stopbits 1
    end
    We are wondering if you have any tips to get around this.
    Also,  should these access points be able to handle ~200 clients? How close to the root access point should the repeaters be placed? I basically just go until my signal gets low and put a repeater within that range. Could vary from 30-60 meters away.
    Thanks

    Also,  should these access points be able to handle ~200 clients?
    APs, in theory, can handle >1,200 clients.  In theory.  In practice, Cisco recommends between 12-25 clients.  Imagine if you have, say, 50 clients and they are trying to access the network on a 100 Mbps FastEthernet connection.  That slows them down, right?  But consider wireless as a broadcast.  One talks and the rest listens.

  • Performance issues with version enable partitioned tables?

    Hi all,
    Are there any known performance issues with version enable partitioned tables?
    I’ve been doing some performance testes with a large version enable partitioned table and it seems that OCB optimiser is choosing very expensive plans during merge operations.
    Tanks in advance,
    Vitor
    Example:
         Object Name     Rows     Bytes     Cost     Object Node     In/Out     PStart     PStop
    UPDATE STATEMENT Optimizer Mode=CHOOSE          1          249                    
    UPDATE     SIG.SIG_QUA_IMG_LT                                   
    NESTED LOOPS SEMI          1     266     249                    
    PARTITION RANGE ALL                                   1     9
    TABLE ACCESS FULL     SIG.SIG_QUA_IMG_LT     1     259     2               1     9
    VIEW     SYS.VW_NSO_1     1     7     247                    
    NESTED LOOPS          1     739     247                    
    NESTED LOOPS          1     677     247                    
    NESTED LOOPS          1     412     246                    
    NESTED LOOPS          1     114     244                    
    INDEX RANGE SCAN     WMSYS.MODIFIED_TABLES_PK     1     62     2                    
    INDEX RANGE SCAN     SIG.QIM_PK     1     52     243                    
    TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID     SIG.SIG_QUA_IMG_LT     1     298     2               ROWID     ROW L
    INDEX RANGE SCAN     SIG.SIG_QUA_IMG_PKI$     1          1                    
    INDEX RANGE SCAN     WMSYS.WM$NEXTVER_TABLE_NV_INDX     1     265     1                    
    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN     WMSYS.MODIFIED_TABLES_PK     1     62                         
    /* Formatted on 2004/04/19 18:57 (Formatter Plus v4.8.0) */                                        
    UPDATE /*+ USE_NL(Z1) ROWID(Z1) */sig.sig_qua_img_lt z1                                        
    SET z1.nextver =                                        
    SYS.ltutil.subsversion                                        
    (z1.nextver,                                        
    SYS.ltutil.getcontainedverinrange (z1.nextver,                                        
    'SIG.SIG_QUA_IMG',                                        
    'NpCyPCX3dkOAHSuBMjGioQ==',                                        
    4574,                                        
    4575                                        
    4574                                        
    WHERE z1.ROWID IN (
    (SELECT /*+ ORDERED USE_NL(T1) USE_NL(T2) USE_NL(J2) USE_NL(J3)
    INDEX(T1 QIM_PK) INDEX(T2 SIG_QUA_IMG_PKI$)
    INDEX(J2 WM$NEXTVER_TABLE_NV_INDX) INDEX(J3 MODIFIED_TABLES_PK) */
    t2.ROWID
    FROM (SELECT /*+ INDEX(WM$MODIFIED_TABLES MODIFIED_TABLES_PK) */
    UNIQUE VERSION
    FROM wmsys.wm$modified_tables
    WHERE table_name = 'SIG.SIG_QUA_IMG'
    AND workspace = 'NpCyPCX3dkOAHSuBMjGioQ=='
    AND VERSION > 4574
    AND VERSION <= 4575) j1,
    sig.sig_qua_img_lt t1,
    sig.sig_qua_img_lt t2,
    wmsys.wm$nextver_table j2,
    (SELECT /*+ INDEX(WM$MODIFIED_TABLES MODIFIED_TABLES_PK) */
    UNIQUE VERSION
    FROM wmsys.wm$modified_tables
    WHERE table_name = 'SIG.SIG_QUA_IMG'
    AND workspace = 'NpCyPCX3dkOAHSuBMjGioQ=='
    AND VERSION > 4574
    AND VERSION <= 4575) j3
    WHERE t1.VERSION = j1.VERSION
    AND t1.ima_id = t2.ima_id
    AND t1.qim_inf_esq_x_tile = t2.qim_inf_esq_x_tile
    AND t1.qim_inf_esq_y_tile = t2.qim_inf_esq_y_tile
    AND t2.nextver != '-1'
    AND t2.nextver = j2.next_vers
    AND j2.VERSION = j3.VERSION))

    Hello Vitor,
    There are currently no known issues with version enabled tables that are partitioned. The merge operation may need to access all of the partitions of a table depending on the data that needs to be moved/copied from the child to the parent. This is the reason for the 'Partition Range All' step in the plan that you provided. The majority of the remaining steps are due to the hints that have been added, since this plan has provided the best performance for us in the past for this particular statement. If this is not the case for you, and you feel that another plan would yield better performance, then please let me know and I will take a look at it.
    One suggestion would be to make sure that the table was been recently analyzed so that the optimizer has the most current data about the table.
    Performance issues are very hard to fix without a reproducible test case, so it may be advisable to file a TAR if you continue to have significant performance issues with the mergeWorkspace operation.
    Thank You,
    Ben

  • I just restored my 13" MBP i5 at the apple store to the newest version of Lion after issues with a previous Time Machine backup from Snow Leopard- this time I created a new account and just ported files and folders, and now MS Office doesn't work. Help?

    I just restored my 13" MBP i5 at the apple store to the newest version of Lion after issues with a previous Time Machine backup from Snow Leopard- this time I created a new account and just ported files and folders, and now MS Office doesn't work.
    ^^ that's the main problem. Here's the full history.
    I bought a new 13" i5 MBP, early 2011 edition. I had an old white Macbook 2.14 ghz core2duo on Snow Leopard. I attempted to port over my time machine backup, but encountered problems in that my User was inaccessible from the new computer after the import finished, and I had to go in and change the root password, etc, and for some reason or another, I couldn't install any programs at all from that administrator's account. By "couldn't" I mean I could install them, but upon installation they would never boot. So, I took it to the apple store and did a clean install from the most up to date Lion OSX. Then, I created a brand new admin account, instead of trying to import the old one, and things seemed great. Then, I just imported my old files from the TM backup, but not any system settings, permissions, or user data. Just my Docs, pics, vids, apps, and itunes stuff.
    Here's where things get weird again. I imported this stuff under the name "old", but all of these folders have a red negative sign on them, marking them as restricted. So, from my main admin account, I cannot even peruse these folders. Since I didn't import user data, I can't sign in to the "old" account to change permissions. I already tried to change the permissions from system preferences, but that didn't change anything. And now, for whatever reason, of all the apps that were imported then, MS Office is the only set of apps that does not work. When I click on it, it just says there was a problem and asks if I'd like to send a report to apple. I tried reinstalling it to no avail. I'm an English student, so i really need access to Word. Can anyone help? The Apple store is a major detour for me and would like to fix this issue myself.

    Most likely you have Office 2004 which are PPC-only applications and will not work in Lion. Upgrade to Office 2011. Other alternatives are:
    Apple's iWork suite (Pages, Numbers, and Keynote.)
    Open Office (Office 2007-like suite compatible with OS X.)
    NeoOffice (similar to Open Office.)
    LibreOffice (a new direction for the Open Office suite.)

  • Create transaction with variant not working

    Hello!
    Here's my issue -- I have a program that, right now, is more of a shell than anything else.  It is to access the HR Logical Database PNPCE, and to help filter the data I pull back, I created a Selection View with a couple of additional fields.  I put the necessary values in these fields and saved it as a Variant.
    All I want to do is create a transaction to run my program and start it using my Variant to fill in these additional fields.  Using SE93, I can create a plain transaction with no problem.  However, if I click the "Start with variant" drop-down field, I get a response that says screen 1000 (my default Selection Screen) has no variants.
    At first we thought there was some client-side things needing configuration, but if I go create a quick-and-dirty program with a single Selection Screen value (no Selection View) and a Variant, SE93 sees the variant with no problems.  So I'm wondering if maybe it has something to do with the fact that I'm using a Selection View.  Unfortunately, I'm so new to ABAP, I'm completely stuck on how to proceed.
    Any suggestions?  Thank you so much!

    Saquib, thank you SO much!  You're right -- that worked.
    As a relative newbie to SAP R/3 and ABAP, I'm new to little quirks like this.  In other examples, the list (F4) does show the variants.  For some reason, this one didn't.  I entered it anyway, saved, and ran the transaction, and it popped up with the fields populated from the variant.
    Again, kudos and thank you so much.  Points duly awarded.

  • Proformance issue with 'sid generation on activation'

    Hi Gurus,
    In our BW(NW 2004) system we are using Cognos as reporting tool, due to process chain failure at DSO level we unchecked 'sid generation on activation' and chain running successfully after that.
    unchecking will be a performance issue due to generating sid's at run time as per SAP.
    My question is as i am using Cognos in place of BEX. what are the possiblities of effecting the performance and alll?
    Please provide your valuable suggestions.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Suresh.

    Hi Suresh,
    Irrespective of what is the reporting front end you use, if you use this DSO for reporting it would generate the SID values at the runtime which will have huge impact on reporting performance. Just removing the SID generation option would temporarily fix the load issue, with quick activation of DSO but it will affect the most important area reporting performance.
    Try to solve the issue with SID generation error while activating at the BW side which could be because of the special character issues and once you fix that your process chains would load fine with a far better performance while reporting on this DSO.
    Regards,
    Mani

Maybe you are looking for

  • IMac 10.6.8 to Mountain Lion

    Version:1.0 StartHTML:0000000105 EndHTML:0000010785 StartFragment:0000008258 EndFragment:0000010749                     Hello everyone: I have and old iMac (the white one), upgraded with Mac OS X 10.6.8. The computer works perfectly, I´m a photograph

  • Partially restoring data

    I want to reinstall my macbook pro. with this new install i want to restore some information from my time machine backup, but not all. Is it possible to "go back in time" from the fresh installation and collect some of the the files from the last ins

  • SAP Archiving in SAP 3.1 into third party systems

    Hello, 1. Is it possible to archive the documents in SAP 3.1i and retrive via any third party systems? If yes, let me know the steps and third party systems details? 2. Is it possible to archive the documents in SAP 3.1i and retrive from ECC Via SAP

  • Partial Lost of Mail

    I have discovered that ALL my mail from two months previously is no longer available today. I have rebuild the mailboxes (2 accounts) all the associated drafts, inbox, sent etc... but nothing comes back. I have also made a copy of my MAIL folder (in

  • What is the cost of changing the case of my macbook pro?

    What is the cost of changing the case of my macbook pro?