Issues with syndication of multi-valued tuple fields

I'm trying to create a syndication map (using a schema) for a main table in MDM which includes a multi-multivalued tuple. The map generates an internal error on execution when I have the tuple fields mapped but executes correctly when I leave them unmapped. Has anybody else experienced this issue?

Hi Lori,
The Tuple syndication in MDM 7.1 works slightly differently than a normal lookup or Qualified mapping.
While syndicating tuple fields we cannot map the lookup Tuple field which acts as the linking field in the main table.
However you can map the tuple member fields and MDM syndicator allows you to map and syndicate them.
I have tried mapping and viewing the same and it works fine with me.
Hope It Helped
Thanks & Regards
Simona Pinto

Similar Messages

Issue with using a multi-valued attribute in calculation

Hi,
I have the following two attributes for some calculation:
QTY (mdex:long-set)     VOLUME (mdex:long)
1^2^3^4^7                2
3                        4
I want to calculate the total volume with (MAX value of QTY in the set) * VOLUME.
It seems there is no built in function to calculate the MAX value from a set. So, for now, I am trying to calculate the same using ARB with the following qry:
DEFINE "myVW" AS SELECT
ARB(CASE WHEN IS_EMPTY("QTY") THEN { 0 } ELSE "QTY" END) AS "Quantity", /* QTY can be NULL */
ARB("TOTAL_PART_VOLUME") AS "UnitVolume" /* ARB to prevent "Source attribute must be aggregated" error */
"UnitVolume" * "Quantity" AS "TotalVolume"
FROM BASE_VIEW
GROUP BY "SOME_OTHER_COLUMN"
I am getting the folloing error: Cannot multiply mdex:long and mdex:long-set. I am not sure why "Quantity" is a multivalued field.
Is the above calculation possible at all? Or a better approach would be to calculate TotalVolume using a transformer in the integrator during data load?
Thanks in advance. I am using endeca version 7.6.1.
daich

Hi Daich,
Doing an ARB (or nearly any set based operation) on a SET will still return you a SET. In your case, it's a Set of one (which might be the least useful thing there is).
The only way you can really go from Sets to Members of Sets (which should be non-set types) is to do a GROUP BY MEMBERS(QTY). You could then do that plus some EQL gymnastics and get back to taking the max off of the grouped attribute.
Depending on your data volumes, this EQL could perform sub-optimally. You may want to consider adjusting your data model to account for this by having single-assign and multi-assign versions of the same attribute. It's a little tough to say if that's an option given your use case without more info though.
Regards,
Patrick Rafferty
Branchbird.

Does Access 2013 Web App support multi-value lookup fields?

I hope someone can please help me with this as I've not been able to find the answer by searching this site, nor elsewhere on the web. I have Access 2013 open connected to my web app on Sharepoint Skydrive with a table open in 'edit table' mode. When I add
a new lookup field I don't see any option to make it a multi-value lookup field. Is there no support for that in web apps or am I doing something wrong?
Cheers, Henk.
Cheers, Henk.

This is what I use in the Parent RowSource:
This in the parent child relationship
In the row source query from the child, I have a simular expression. By inverting the boolean 'childToggler' I can force the child-form to requery. Because the boolean is in the session table record (which is part of the child form recordsource query as
well), the boolean will be inverted in both and won't disrupt the relationship.
Besides the toggler this relationship only contains an ID with preceding zero's, but the expression can contain pretty much everything.

Issue with printing of Currency Value.

Hi,
I have an issue with printing of Currency Value.
( Pleae let me know if any thread available already I searched it before posting but not found).
The Problem is as follows:
I have a field s_value TYPE MARM-SALK3. (which is of currency type).
The value of field is actually 1664.1450. Currency USD
But when I print this variable in ALV report it prints as 166414.50 though I used the same data type. (SALK3).
Pleaes help me to fix this.
Regards,
Venkat

Hi,
If you use ALV to display currency value, you must sure that currency amount links with currency unit. You can archive this by using ALV fieldcat:
wa_fieldcat-fieldname = 'SALK3'.
wa_fieldcat-tabname = 'ITAB'.
wa_fieldcat-cfieldname = 'WAERS'.
wa_fieldcat-ctabname = 'ITAB'.
append wa_fieldcat to gt_fieldcat.
Please check,
Regards,

Assignment on Multi-Valued Lookup field

Hi experts,
Is it possible to assign value to a multi-valued lookup field using assignment.
For example, "Products" is the main table. In the products table I have a multi-valued attribute "PLANT". Product table contains a field "PLANT" of type look-up multivalued to the Plants table.
So, is it possible to assign Plant attribute values to PLANT Look-up multivalued field in the main table using assignment??
Is not, then is there any other work around solution to acheive this requirement?
Best Regards,
Shiv

hi,
So, is it possible to assign Plant attribute values to PLANT Look-up multivalued field in the main table using assignment??
No this is not possible, to get the values of the plant attributes you again have to lookup at the plant master data and fetch the values from there in the routine.
regards,
Arvind.

Multi-valued Tuple Validation from Main record

Hi All,
does somebody know how I can do a Validation from the Main Table against multivalues Tuple field?
The option for validation on the tuple table (dropdown list of all tuples) doesn't work for me as I am able to set the validation there only against the Tuple member fields, but not with reference to the Main Table record standard fields.
I try to do the validation against the Tuple[Record] field, but it doesn't work, even that it works on the Qualified field.
I need to achieve the following:
1. We have records in the main table containing one multivalued Tuple field. The tuple field has 1 Display field, which is lookup(text) field against lookup table. In this lookup table we have 2 display field: Source and Code (The source can be "W1" or "W2");
2. We want to check:
- if the field X of a record from the main table = "W1" - the choosen Tuple record should not contain W2;
- if the field X of a record from the main table = "W2" - the choosen Tuple record should not contain W1;
I tryed with this validation: IF(X=W1,HAS_ALL_VALUES(TUPLE.[RECORD],"W2")), but it always gives me FALSE.
I tryed also with FIND but the result is the same.
Did somebody found a way how to do it?
Thanks&Regards,
ILIN

Hi Ilin,
This is achievable.
Firstly select Main table in Validation tab and create Validation say XYZ, write Validation expression as:
X=W1
Select W1 from lookups tab under assignment expression.
Write click on this validation and go for Edit Validation Groups, right click on validation Groups and Add Child
say X=W1 then Tuple <> W2. Select in Validation XYZ Group Property as X=W1 then Tuple <> W2 from Available Group to Selected Group.
Now Select this Tuple from drop-down under validation tab (not Main table). Since here you can see and select all the Fields of your Tuple only. Create a validation say ABC. Select the field in this tuple which is look-up to field which has values W1 and W2 Say this field is XX. Write Validation Expression as
XX.(record) Not equal to operator "W2"
I am not able to write Not Equal operator, so please select this operator from Operators tab under Assignment Expression.
Here since you can't select value from lockups tab, i mean disabled then manually write W2 (Case Sensitive) within double quotes. Also make sure that here you too add Validation ABC Group propery as X=W1 then Tuple <> W2 from Available Group to Selected Group.
Now select any record in main table, right click on it Validations>Execute Group>X=W1 then Tuple <> W2
You will get your desired result. you would able to see two columns under Records with name XYZ and ABC, if both of this has tick mark Only then validation is considered to be successful. if any of this has cross mark, i mean if X = tick mark symbol and XX = cross mark Symbol then this validation considers to be failed and vice-versa.
You can similarly do for below too.
If the field X of a record from the main table = "W2" - the choosen Tuple record should not contain W1;
Just check it and revert with result. This is working fine at my end.
Regards,
Mandeep Saini

Issue with function module updated values

Hi Experts,
We have an issue with customized program. In this program function module 'BBP_PD_SC_GETDETAIL' not picking
the updated values when the UI was opened. But when we were executing the same function module directly by providing the values manually it is picking up the correct data.
We thought it was a problem with session killing or buffer refresh ? We dont know how to handle this issue.
If you have any suggestions that would be great help full for me . Please reply asap.
Regards,
Chandu

Hi,
Thanks for your quick reply.
I have passed the values to the function module in the program and also used the same values for manually testing of the function module. Getting the correct values when I was testing manually.
We thought it was a session killing problem as we developed the customized code. So any idea how to refresh the session even
though the UI(User Interface) was opened.
This issue was solved when the UI was closed and opened again.
Any other ideas on this issue ?
Regards,
Chandu

Issue with setting a default value to a Tabular Form field

Hi -
I'm running into an issue setting the default value of a tabular form column. I'm trying to set the default value to the row number (#rownum#). This used to work in previous versions, but now it's returning 0. Is there a was to set this value in the default value attribute of the field with a substitution string?
Thank you in advance for help!

Share with us what worked in previous versions.
Jeff

Issue with PO release (multi level approval)

Hi,
Need help regarding PO release. I am working with 4 level approval process.
Information:
it is sequential release as I can see in workflow log, a new workflow gets generated for next level only after previous level executes the workitem.
Facing following issue at 2nd Level :
Level 2 releases item and it goes to Level 3, but workitem doesnt disappear from inbox.Once Level 3 releases item, an acceptance mail goes to Level 2. But along with the mail, updated workitem (i.e. showing release by 3rd level) also appears in inbox of Level2. Now two work items appear in Level2 Inbox.
In Workflow Log, this is how its behaving:
WORKFLOW STARTED-->
1st WF appears in WF log.
Level 1 releases WI ->
2nd workflow appears in WF log +
1st workflow with (in process status)
Level 2 releases WI ->
3rd WF appears +
2nd workflow with (in process status) +
1st workflow with (in process status)
Level 3 releases WI ->
3rd WF appears +
2nd workflow with (in process status) +
1st workflow with (in process status)
ISSUE: As soon as Level 3 sends back acceptance to Level 2, updated WI item appears( i.e. with latest release status which in this case is: released by level1, Level2 and Level3) along with the mail.
Level 4 releases WI ->
4th WF appears +
3rd WF appears (in process status) +
2nd workflow with (in process status) +
1st workflow with (STATUS COMPLETED)
ISSUE: As soon as Level 4 sends back acceptance to Level 2, updated WI item appears( i.e. with latest release status which in this case is: released by level1, Level2, Level3 and Level 4) along with the mail.
Result:
PO gets released.
In workflow log 2nd, 3rd and 4th workflow appear with IN PROCESS STATUS. All of them show process stopped at LEVEL2.

Hi Kjetil,
Release strategy is being used. Configuration for release strategy is given as following.
RGroup Rcode   Workflow     Agent
Z6          R1         1                Blank
Z6          R1             1                Blank
Z6          R1             1                Blank
Z6          R1             1                Blank
Release is sequential.
For column 'Agent' mentioning position or User is not really useful because we are getting agents through Z table. Reason is: current org structure supports 1 position with multiple users from same department. In our scenario we need to find initiators department then find relevant approval levels for that departemnt. So I cannot mention any position in 'Agent' Column as release code will be locked against one position and one departetment.
Agents picked through Z table. Table has fields Agent/ UserID , level, department.
Logic to pick agents( Object and method created ):
When workflow starts, it finds department of the initiator.
For that department-> find approval levels available(L1, L2, L3).
For these levels -> Find Agent mentioned for that level.
Onece Agents are found for all levels -> Pass them to WF container.
In task activity, These agents are passed back to the rule and the task comes to know which agent it should go to.
Result : Four workflows start in sequence. When last level releases, only 1st workflow shows COMPLETED status. Rest three hang at level 2. If I see Me29N , release for that item is shown completed. To me it seems triggering of only first workflow is enough for release. Is there any way I can avoid trigerring of other three workflows?
Edited by: User112 User112 on Jan 25, 2008 6:30 AM
Edited by: User112 User112 on Jan 25, 2008 6:31 AM

Issue with VS project - Report has remapped fields

VS 2005, Crystal XI R2
We recently upgraded a VS project using Crystal reports. The database has changed, with table name and field name changes.
We used the "set datasource location" to remap the table names and fields. Reports run fine as stand alone.
But when running from the VB project we have an issue when logon info is applied to the subreports.
In the standard code to apply logon information to the subreports, this line of code
Crtable.Location = crConnectionInfo.DatabaseName & ".dbo" + "." + crConnectionInfo.UserID + "." + crConnectionInfo.Password + "." + Crtable.Name
fails because Crtable.Name resolves to the old table name (ctct) which has been remapped to new table ca_contact using the set datasource location option from Crystal.
If I comment out this line of code, the reports seem to run fine, sometimes we get prompted for connection info. Once the info is set, the report runs.
But can I get this line of code to work? is there some way to get Crtable.name to point to the actual table name "ca_contact" and not the old name "ctct" that the table and fields were remapped from?

Thanks for the reply, but the subreport has been already remapped. I just went back in and double checked.
I am thinking about writing some code that will be something like
(pseudo)
if table = ctct then replace table name with ca_contact
but there should be a way around this. Even though the table is remapped, it is picking up the old table name alias instead of what it is mapped to.

Issue with creating List of Values in Business View Manager

Hi,
Could any one help me to figure out what this issue refers to?
When i created a List of Values in Business View Manager, it is throwing the following error!!!!
The List of Values used by this parameter cannot be based on a Business View derived from the current Data Foundation or Business Element.
Prior to creating LoV, i've done successfully with creating Data connection, Data foundation, Business element and Business View..
Thanks
Viswa

Hi Visaw,
Firstly,
-->Open Repository Explorer,
-->where you are have related DF,DC,BV,BEand LOV's
-->Right click on LOV's -->There you can find Schedule list of values.Then schedule list of values and check if it prompts for errors.
If you face the same problem, what is the error you are getting.
Else try to use the LOV's and proceed further.
-->Check whether the LOV's are pointing to the same Business View and check the Business view pointing to the same Datafoundation.
If you are facing the same problem then try with the below steps:
-->Try to Create a report at designer level Using then Business view
-->Create two new parameters and select the existing parameters(LOV parameter's)
-->Check whether it is working.
-->If you face the same problem ,Update the connection of Business view manager.
Go to Database tab-->Select Set DataSource location and update it with current Businessview Manager.
Try this ,and let us know.
Regards,
Navin

Issue with Dashboard Prompt passing value to Presentation Variable

I have 2 tabular reports that grab 2 variables respectively: @Month and @Year.
The reports work fine.
My issues is that to compute the most recent month & year, so I can pass the values to the 2 variables mentioned above, I have a dashboard prompt on the same page as the 2 reports. In the dashboard prompts (Edit Box types), I have SQL in the "Default" that computes the most recent month & year. This logic also works perfectly when you preview the results of the prompt.
My issue is that when I land on the page, it seems that the month & year prompts are not computing. I have an old value of "Dec" "2009" instead of "May" "2010".
It seems the Default SQL logic is NOT running on its own? As an aside, we do our development in a test environment and the catalog is promoted to production nightly. The "Dec" and "2009" I see is the correct value for the test environment, so it looks as if the defaul values are just being migrated with the catalog, but then the SQL to compute the latest values of the 2 propmts are never executing when the user lands on the page? Thus everyone sees Dec 2009 data instead of May 2010...Help!

Hi,
dgerena wrote:
My issues is that to compute the most recent month & year, so I can pass the values to the 2 variables mentioned above, I have a dashboard prompt on the same page as the 2 reports. In the dashboard prompts (Edit Box types), I have SQL in the "Default" that computes the most recent month & year. This logic also works perfectly when you preview the results of the prompt.You are creating the second prompt (edit box) to make the first prompt values, You can use the same sql in the report default to SQL in the first prompt itself.
If I am wrong please clarify.
Thanks,
Vino

Query Issue with adding a static value

I have written a query in SAP that works the way I need it to. I am going to schedule it so that SAP does a file transfer of the output to another area where the data will be accumulated.
My problem is that I want the name of the system to appear at the end of each line but it is not in any table I can find to match up with the userid.
EX:
UserID Group System
JDOE HR Query Group P201
The field for system is not in any tables but I want to add it and give it a constant/static value all the time in the output.
Any ideas?
Thanks!
Justin Dauby -- SAP Security Analyst
Kimball International Inc.,

The name of the system is not in a table, but rather a structure called SYST. You can evaluate it using the system field sy-sysid.
Another option is to call function module RFC_SYSTEM_INFO. The export parameter RFCSI_EXPORT will deliver the system id from component RFCSYSID of the structure RFCSI.
Cheers,
Julius

Issue with Safety Upper limit for CALDAY Field for Generic Data Source

Hi,
I have given Upper limit as 1 for Calday field of one of the Generic Data Sources.
I have got a doubt here.If today's load got failed and I will rerun the load next day.So Will that new run captures all 2 days records.
Can any one advise me on this.
Regards,
K.Krishna.

Hi,
A one-day upper safety interval determines that an extraction run today, only fetches records up to yesterday (if the pointer has the day before yesterday date, the extraction comprises from the day before yesterday to yesterday). This is meant to avoid missing records that were about to be persisted in the database when the delta extraction is running but whose date was determined in memory before the delta started.
If pointer has today date value and you want to load data from today and yesterday, you should use a lower safety interval. Take into account that this could reload data previously extracted. Therefore, only InfoProviders with overwritting features (DataStores or InfoObject master data) should be used as targets of this extractions.
You can find further details at:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/37/4f3ca8b672a34082ab3085d3c22145/content.htm
I hope this helps you.
Regards,
Maximiliano

Issue with Run time parameter values

Hi All,
Am facing an error while loading EBS 11.5.10 Financial data. Problem is, my parameters in the SQL Qualifier query (run time parameters in the SQL query) were not being replaced with appropriate values during run time. This is happening for the task "SDE_ORA_Reverse_GLJournals_ImportReference_Extract" that have SQL query in 'mplt_BC_ORA_XactsimpGlrfExtract' mapplet.
Ihave checked in parameter file and it have values for those Run time parameters. For some reasons, these values were not being picked up by that SQL query.
Can someboday help me on this about possible reason(s) behind this?

There are 5 tasks SDE_PSFT_PayrollFact_Total, SDE_PSFT_PayrollFact_Earnings, SDE_PSFT_PayrollFact_EarningsOther, SDE_PSFT_PayrollFact_Deductions, SDE_PSFT_PayrollFact_Taxes are failing all are with same error READER_1_1_1> PR_18012 SQL Error [
ORA-00936: missing expression Database driver error...
I verified the mapplet in that missing expression is $$LAST_EXTRACT_DATE value.
If you know any workaround for this issue please suggest
I am attaching one of the error logs.
DIRECTOR> VAR_27028 Use override value [DataWarehouse] for session parameter:[$DBConnection_OLAP].
DIRECTOR> VAR_27028 Use override value [PSFT_9_0_HCM] for session parameter:[$DBConnection_OLTP].
DIRECTOR> VAR_27028 Use override value [12] for mapping parameter:[$$DATASOURCE_NUM_ID].
DIRECTOR> VAR_27027 Use default value [] for mapping parameter:[mplt_BC_PSFT_PayrollFact_Total.$$INITIAL_EXTRACT_DATE].
DIRECTOR> VAR_27027 Use default value [] for mapping parameter:[mplt_BC_PSFT_PayrollFact_Total.$$LAST_EXTRACT_DATE].
DIRECTOR> VAR_27028 Use override value [DEFAULT] for mapping parameter:[$$TENANT_ID].
DIRECTOR> TM_6014 Initializing session [SDE_PSFT_PayrollFact_Total_Full] at [Wed Dec 10 13:41:44 2008]
DIRECTOR> TM_6683 Repository Name: [Oracle_BI_DW_Base]
DIRECTOR> TM_6684 Server Name: [Oracle_BI_DW_Base_Integration_Service]
DIRECTOR> TM_6686 Folder: [SDE_PSFT_90_Adaptor_Test]
DIRECTOR> TM_6685 Workflow: [SDE_PSFT_PayrollFact_Total_Full]
DIRECTOR> TM_6101 Mapping name: SDE_PSFT_PayrollFact_Total [version 1]
DIRECTOR> TM_6827 [C:\Informatica\PowerCenter8.1.1\server\infa_shared\Storage] will be used as storage directory for session [SDE_PSFT_PayrollFact_Total_Full].
DIRECTOR> CMN_1805 Recovery cache will be deleted when running in normal mode.
DIRECTOR> CMN_1802 Session recovery cache initialization is complete.
DIRECTOR> TM_6703 Session [SDE_PSFT_PayrollFact_Total_Full] is run by 32-bit Integration Service [node01_HSCHBSCGN20031], version [8.1.1], build [0831].
MANAGER> PETL_24058 Running Partition Group [1].
MANAGER> PETL_24000 Parallel Pipeline Engine initializing.
MANAGER> PETL_24001 Parallel Pipeline Engine running.
MANAGER> PETL_24003 Initializing session run.
MAPPING> CMN_1569 Server Mode: [ASCII]
MAPPING> CMN_1570 Server Code page: [MS Windows Latin 1 (ANSI), superset of Latin1]
MAPPING> TM_6151 Session Sort Order: [Binary]
MAPPING> TM_6156 Using LOW precision decimal arithmetic
MAPPING> TM_6180 Deadlock retry logic will not be implemented.
MAPPING> TM_6307 DTM Error Log Disabled.
MAPPING> TE_7022 TShmWriter: Initialized
MAPPING> DBG_21075 Connecting to database [orcl], user [obaw]
MAPPING> TM_6007 DTM initialized successfully for session [SDE_PSFT_PayrollFact_Total_Full]
DIRECTOR> PETL_24033 All DTM Connection Info: [<NONE>].
MANAGER> PETL_24004 Starting pre-session tasks. : (Wed Dec 10 13:41:45 2008)
MANAGER> PETL_24027 Pre-session task completed successfully. : (Wed Dec 10 13:41:46 2008)
DIRECTOR> PETL_24006 Starting data movement.
MAPPING> TM_6660 Total Buffer Pool size is 32000000 bytes and Block size is 1280000 bytes.
READER_1_1_1> DBG_21438 Reader: Source is [HR90DEV], user [sysadm]
READER_1_1_1> DBG_21438 Reader: Source is [HR90DEV], user [sysadm]
READER_1_1_1> BLKR_16003 Initialization completed successfully.
WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8147 Writer: Target is database [orcl], user [obaw], bulk mode [OFF]
WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8124 Target Table W_PSFT_PAYROLL_F_TMP :SQL INSERT statement:
INSERT INTO W_PSFT_PAYROLL_F_TMP(EMPLID,EMPL_RCD,PAYGROUP,PAY_PERIOD_START_DT,PAY_PERIOD_END_DT,CHECK_DT,OFF_CYCLE,PAGE_NUM,LINE_NUM,SEPCHK,COMPANY,DEPTID,LOCATION_CD,PLAN_TYPE,BENEFIT_PLAN,BENEFIT_RCD_NBR,DEDCD,DED_CLASS,DED_SLSTX_CLASS,ADDL_NBR,PAY_EARN_START_DT,PAY_EARN_END_DT,ERNCD,COUNTRY,STATE,LOCALITY,TAX_CLASS,PAYROLL_TYPE,PAY_DETAIL_FLG,PAYROLL_AMOUNT,CHANGED_ON_DT,DATASOURCE_NUM_ID,INTEGRATION_ID,TENANT_ID,X_CUSTOM) VALUES ( ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)
WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8270 Target connection group #1 consists of target(s) [W_PSFT_PAYROLL_F_TMP]
WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8003 Writer initialization complete.
READER_1_1_1> BLKR_16007 Reader run started.
READER_1_1_1> PR_18039 Application Source Qualifier [mplt_BC_PSFT_PayrollFact_Total.Sq_Payroll_Total] is reading from PeopleSoft.
WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8005 Writer run started.
WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8158
*****START LOAD SESSION*****
Load Start Time: Wed Dec 10 13:41:46 2008
Target tables:
W_PSFT_PAYROLL_F_TMP
READER_1_1_1> PR_18008 Application SQ instance [mplt_BC_PSFT_PayrollFact_Total.Sq_Payroll_Total] User SQL Query [SELECT
PS_PAY_CHECK.COMPANY ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAYGROUP ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAY_END_DT ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.OFF_CYCLE ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAGE_NUM ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.LINE_NUM ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.SEPCHK ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.EMPLID ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.EMPL_RCD ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.DEPTID ,
'TOTAL_GROSS' SUMMARY_TYPE,
PS_PAY_CHECK.TOTAL_GROSS SUMMARY_AMOUNT,
PS_PAY_CHECK.CHECK_DT ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.LOCATION ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.UPDATE_DT
FROM
PS_PAY_CHECK
WHERE
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAYCHECK_STATUS IN ('A','F','R') AND
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAY_END_DT >=
UNION ALL
SELECT
PS_PAY_CHECK.COMPANY ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAYGROUP ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAY_END_DT ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.OFF_CYCLE ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAGE_NUM ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.LINE_NUM ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.SEPCHK ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.EMPLID ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.EMPL_RCD ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.DEPTID ,
'TOTAL_TAXES' SUMMARY_TYPE,
PS_PAY_CHECK.TOTAL_TAXES SUMMARY_AMOUNT,
PS_PAY_CHECK.CHECK_DT ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.LOCATION ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.UPDATE_DT
FROM
PS_PAY_CHECK
WHERE
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAYCHECK_STATUS IN ('A','F','R') AND
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAY_END_DT >=
UNION ALL
SELECT
PS_PAY_CHECK.COMPANY ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAYGROUP ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAY_END_DT ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.OFF_CYCLE ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAGE_NUM ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.LINE_NUM ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.SEPCHK ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.EMPLID ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.EMPL_RCD ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.DEPTID ,
'TOTAL_DEDUCTIONS' SUMMARY_TYPE,
PS_PAY_CHECK.TOTAL_DEDUCTIONS SUMMARY_AMOUNT,
PS_PAY_CHECK.CHECK_DT ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.LOCATION ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.UPDATE_DT
FROM
PS_PAY_CHECK
WHERE
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAYCHECK_STATUS IN ('A','F','R') AND
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAY_END_DT >=
UNION ALL
SELECT
PS_PAY_CHECK.COMPANY ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAYGROUP ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAY_END_DT ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.OFF_CYCLE ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAGE_NUM ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.LINE_NUM ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.SEPCHK ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.EMPLID ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.EMPL_RCD ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.DEPTID ,
'NET_PAY' SUMMARY_TYPE,
PS_PAY_CHECK.NET_PAY SUMMARY_AMOUNT,
PS_PAY_CHECK.CHECK_DT ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.LOCATION ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.UPDATE_DT
FROM
PS_PAY_CHECK
WHERE
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAYCHECK_STATUS IN ('A','F','R') AND
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAY_END_DT >= ]
READER_1_1_1> CMN_1761 Timestamp Event: [Wed Dec 10 13:41:46 2008]
READER_1_1_1> PR_18012 SQL Error [
ORA-00936: missing expression
Database driver error...
Function Name : Execute
SQL Stmt : SELECT
PS_PAY_CHECK.COMPANY ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAYGROUP ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAY_END_DT ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.OFF_CYCLE ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAGE_NUM ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.LINE_NUM ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.SEPCHK ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.EMPLID ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.EMPL_RCD ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.DEPTID ,
'TOTAL_GROSS' SUMMARY_TYPE,
PS_PAY_CHECK.TOTAL_GROSS SUMMARY_AMOUNT,
PS_PAY_CHECK.CHECK_DT ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.LOCATION ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.UPDATE_DT
FROM
PS_PAY_CHECK
WHERE
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAYCHECK_STATUS IN ('A','F','R') AND
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAY_END_DT >=
UNION ALL
SELECT
PS_PAY_CHECK.COMPANY ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAYGROUP ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAY_END_DT ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.OFF_CYCLE ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAGE_NUM ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.LINE_NUM ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.SEPCHK ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.EMPLID ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.EMPL_RCD ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.DEPTID ,
'TOTAL_TAXES' SUMMARY_TYPE,
PS_PAY_CHECK.TOTAL_TAXES SUMMARY_AMOUNT,
PS_PAY_CHECK.CHECK_DT ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.LOCATION ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.UPDATE_DT
FROM
PS_PAY_CHECK
WHERE
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAYCHECK_STATUS IN ('A','F','R') AND
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAY_END_DT >=
UNION ALL
SELECT
PS_PAY_CHECK.COMPANY ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAYGROUP ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAY_END_DT ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.OFF_CYCLE ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAGE_NUM ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.LINE_NUM ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.SEPCHK ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.EMPLID ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.EMPL_RCD ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.DEPTID ,
'TOTAL_DEDUCTIONS' SUMMARY_TYPE,
PS_PAY_CHECK.TOTAL_DEDUCTIONS SUMMARY_AMOUNT,
PS_PAY_CHECK.CHECK_DT ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.LOCATION ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.UPDATE_DT
FROM
PS_PAY_CHECK
WHERE
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAYCHECK_STATUS IN ('A','F','R') AND
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAY_END_DT >=
UNION ALL
SELECT
PS_PAY_CHECK.COMPANY ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAYGROUP ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAY_END_DT ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.OFF_CYCLE ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAGE_NUM ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.LINE_NUM ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.SEPCHK ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.EMPLID ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.EMPL_RCD ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.DEPTID ,
'NET_PAY' SUMMARY_TYPE,
PS_PAY_CHECK.NET_PAY SUMMARY_AMOUNT,
PS_PAY_CHECK.CHECK_DT ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.LOCATION ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.UPDATE_DT
FROM
PS_PAY_CHECK
WHERE
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAYCHECK_STATUS IN ('A','F','R') AND
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAY_END_DT >=
Oracle Fatal Error
Database driver error...
Function Name : Execute
SQL Stmt : SELECT
PS_PAY_CHECK.COMPANY ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAYGROUP ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAY_END_DT ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.OFF_CYCLE ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAGE_NUM ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.LINE_NUM ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.SEPCHK ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.EMPLID ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.EMPL_RCD ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.DEPTID ,
'TOTAL_GROSS' SUMMARY_TYPE,
PS_PAY_CHECK.TOTAL_GROSS SUMMARY_AMOUNT,
PS_PAY_CHECK.CHECK_DT ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.LOCATION ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.UPDATE_DT
FROM
PS_PAY_CHECK
WHERE
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAYCHECK_STATUS IN ('A','F','R') AND
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAY_END_DT >=
UNION ALL
SELECT
PS_PAY_CHECK.COMPANY ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAYGROUP ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAY_END_DT ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.OFF_CYCLE ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAGE_NUM ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.LINE_NUM ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.SEPCHK ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.EMPLID ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.EMPL_RCD ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.DEPTID ,
'TOTAL_TAXES' SUMMARY_TYPE,
PS_PAY_CHECK.TOTAL_TAXES SUMMARY_AMOUNT,
PS_PAY_CHECK.CHECK_DT ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.LOCATION ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.UPDATE_DT
FROM
PS_PAY_CHECK
WHERE
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAYCHECK_STATUS IN ('A','F','R') AND
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAY_END_DT >=
UNION ALL
SELECT
PS_PAY_CHECK.COMPANY ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAYGROUP ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAY_END_DT ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.OFF_CYCLE ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAGE_NUM ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.LINE_NUM ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.SEPCHK ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.EMPLID ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.EMPL_RCD ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.DEPTID ,
'TOTAL_DEDUCTIONS' SUMMARY_TYPE,
PS_PAY_CHECK.TOTAL_DEDUCTIONS SUMMARY_AMOUNT,
PS_PAY_CHECK.CHECK_DT ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.LOCATION ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.UPDATE_DT
FROM
PS_PAY_CHECK
WHERE
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAYCHECK_STATUS IN ('A','F','R') AND
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAY_END_DT >=
UNION ALL
SELECT
PS_PAY_CHECK.COMPANY ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAYGROUP ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAY_END_DT ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.OFF_CYCLE ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAGE_NUM ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.LINE_NUM ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.SEPCHK ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.EMPLID ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.EMPL_RCD ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.DEPTID ,
'NET_PAY' SUMMARY_TYPE,
PS_PAY_CHECK.NET_PAY SUMMARY_AMOUNT,
PS_PAY_CHECK.CHECK_DT ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.LOCATION ,
PS_PAY_CHECK.UPDATE_DT
FROM
PS_PAY_CHECK
WHERE
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAYCHECK_STATUS IN ('A','F','R') AND
PS_PAY_CHECK.PAY_END_DT >=
Oracle Fatal Error]
READER_1_1_1> CMN_1761 Timestamp Event: [Wed Dec 10 13:41:46 2008]
READER_1_1_1> BLKR_16004 ERROR: Prepare failed.
WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8333 Rolling back all the targets due to fatal session error.
WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8325 Final rollback executed for the target [W_PSFT_PAYROLL_F_TMP] at end of load
WRITER_1_*_1> WRT_8035 Load complete time: Wed Dec 10 13:41:46 2008
LOAD SUMMARY
============
WRT_8036 Target: W_PSFT_PAYROLL_F_TMP (Instance Name: [W_PSFT_PAYROLL_F_TMP])
WRT_8044 No data loaded for this target
WRITER_1__1> WRT_8043 ****END LOAD SESSION*****
MANAGER> PETL_24031
***** RUN INFO FOR TGT LOAD ORDER GROUP [1], CONCURRENT SET [1] *****
Thread [READER_1_1_1] created for [the read stage] of partition point [mplt_BC_PSFT_PayrollFact_Total.Sq_Payroll_Total] has completed. The total run time was insufficient for any meaningful statistics.
Thread [TRANSF_1_1_1] created for [the transformation stage] of partition point [mplt_BC_PSFT_PayrollFact_Total.Sq_Payroll_Total] has completed. The total run time was insufficient for any meaningful statistics.
Thread [WRITER_1_*_1] created for [the write stage] of partition point [W_PSFT_PAYROLL_F_TMP] has completed. The total run time was insufficient for any meaningful statistics.
MANAGER> PETL_24005 Starting post-session tasks. : (Wed Dec 10 13:41:47 2008)
MANAGER> PETL_24029 Post-session task completed successfully. : (Wed Dec 10 13:41:47 2008)
MAPPING> TM_6018 Session [SDE_PSFT_PayrollFact_Total_Full] run completed with [0] row transformation errors.
MANAGER> PETL_24002 Parallel Pipeline Engine finished.
DIRECTOR> PETL_24013 Session run completed with failure.
DIRECTOR> TM_6022
SESSION LOAD SUMMARY
================================================
DIRECTOR> TM_6252 Source Load Summary.
DIRECTOR> CMN_1740 Table: [Sq_Payroll_Total] (Instance Name: [mplt_BC_PSFT_PayrollFact_Total.Sq_Payroll_Total])
Output Rows [0], Affected Rows [0], Applied Rows [0], Rejected Rows [0]
DIRECTOR> TM_6253 Target Load Summary.
DIRECTOR> CMN_1740 Table: [W_PSFT_PAYROLL_F_TMP] (Instance Name: [W_PSFT_PAYROLL_F_TMP])
Output Rows [0], Affected Rows [0], Applied Rows [0], Rejected Rows [0]
DIRECTOR> TM_6023
===================================================
DIRECTOR> TM_6020 Session [SDE_PSFT_PayrollFact_Total_Full] completed at [Wed Dec 10 13:41:48 2008]

Issues with syndication of multi-valued tuple fields

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for