Issue with PO release (multi level approval)

Hi,
Need help regarding PO release. I am working with 4 level approval process.
Information:
it is sequential release as I can see in workflow log, a new workflow gets generated for next level only after previous level executes the workitem.
Facing following issue at 2nd Level :
Level 2 releases item and it goes to Level 3, but workitem doesnt disappear from inbox.Once Level 3 releases item, an acceptance mail goes to Level 2. But along with the mail, updated workitem (i.e. showing release by 3rd level) also appears in inbox of Level2. Now two work items appear in Level2 Inbox.
In Workflow Log, this is how its behaving:
WORKFLOW STARTED-->
1st WF appears in WF log.
Level 1 releases WI ->
2nd workflow appears in WF log +
1st workflow with (in process status)
Level 2 releases WI ->
3rd WF appears +
2nd workflow with (in process status) +
1st workflow with (in process status)
Level 3 releases WI ->
3rd WF appears +
2nd workflow with (in process status) +
1st workflow with (in process status)
ISSUE: As soon as Level 3 sends back acceptance to Level 2, updated WI item appears( i.e. with latest release status which in this case is: released by level1, Level2 and Level3) along with the mail.
Level 4 releases WI ->
4th WF appears +
3rd WF appears (in process status) +
2nd workflow with (in process status) +
1st workflow with (STATUS COMPLETED)
ISSUE: As soon as Level 4 sends back acceptance to Level 2, updated WI item appears( i.e. with latest release status which in this case is: released by level1, Level2, Level3 and Level 4) along with the mail.
Result:
PO gets released.
In workflow log 2nd, 3rd and 4th workflow appear with IN PROCESS STATUS. All of them show process stopped at LEVEL2.

Hi Kjetil,
Release strategy is being used. Configuration for release strategy is given as following.
RGroup Rcode   Workflow     Agent
Z6          R1         1                Blank
Z6          R1             1                Blank
Z6          R1             1                Blank
Z6          R1             1                Blank
Release is sequential.
For column 'Agent' mentioning position or User is not really useful because we are getting agents through Z table. Reason is: current org structure supports 1 position with multiple users from same department. In our scenario we need to find initiators department then find relevant approval levels for that departemnt. So I cannot mention any position in 'Agent' Column as release code will be locked against one position and one departetment.
Agents picked through Z table. Table has fields Agent/ UserID , level, department.
Logic to pick agents( Object and method created ):
When workflow starts, it finds department of the initiator.
For that department-> find approval levels available(L1, L2, L3).
For these levels -> Find Agent mentioned for that level.
Onece Agents are found for all levels -> Pass them to WF container.
In task activity, These agents are passed back to the rule and the task comes to know which agent it should go to.
Result : Four workflows start in sequence. When last level releases, only 1st workflow shows COMPLETED status. Rest three hang at level 2. If I see Me29N , release for that item is shown completed. To me it seems triggering of only first workflow is enough for release. Is there any way I can avoid trigerring of other three workflows?
Edited by: User112 User112 on Jan 25, 2008 6:30 AM
Edited by: User112 User112 on Jan 25, 2008 6:31 AM

Similar Messages

Converting WF to Multi level approval.

Hi,
I want to convert my standard WF to go Multi Level. I dont want to make any changes in standard. How can I achieve this and make my WF approvals n rejection go Multi level Approval.
Himanshu.

Hi...
What workflow are you talking about. Can you be more clear on your requirement.
If you dont want to make any changes in the workflow, but still you want mutliple approvals then i guess it will be difficult. For some workflows standard SAP has provided configuration in SAP IMG which will handle multiple approvals with a single workflow design.
Please let us know what scenario are you talking about.
Regards,
Gautham Paspala

Project Workflow Extension for Multi level approval

Hi,
We have a requirement of 2 or 3 level of approval on Project Workflow for Project Status Change. We are planning to use the Seeded extension provided by Oracle to get the Approver for Project Status Change.
The extension procedure provided pa_client_extn_project_wf . select_project_approver has only one out parameter that is Approver id. This means it's only possible 1 level of approval.
Please help me to find out the way how can i make this work for multi level Approval.
Regards,
Ram

Hi Paul,
Thanks for your suggestion.
By comments field I'm assuming OfficeTask.Comments field. Problem is, this field is always null. I tried accessing this field in CheckExitCondition activity as well as in OnTaskCompleted but in both the cases, it was null only(I wrote comments while approving
the task).
I used a code activity within OnTaskCompleted activity and following code for accessing Comments and Description fields:
public string officeComments;
public string officeDescription;
private void TaskCOmplete(object sender, EventArgs e)
CodeActivity Sender = (CodeActivity)sender;
Microsoft.Office.Workflow.Actions.OfficeTask ofctask1 = ((CompositeActivity)Sender.Parent).Parent as Microsoft.Office.Workflow.Actions.OfficeTask;
officeComments = ofctask1.Comments;
officeDescription = ofctask1.Description;
Please tell me if I'm doing anything wrong here, I'm very new to Workflows. Also, do I need to set any specific property of officeTask for retriving comments?
Thank you

Issue with PO Release strategy

Hi experts,
I have problem with Po release strategy in 5 to 10 purchase orders, i have created few purchase orders(2000 Po's) with same document type and company code ..etc and saved, then release strategy has been triggered.
For few purhcase orders release strategy has not been triggered.
If i take 1 po from that few purchase orders(Release strategy has not triggered) as reference and again if i create PO,new purchase order have getting created with release strategy.
Can some body tel how this ican be possible, hope this might be standard syatem behaviour.
Hope i should delete thos e purchase orders and i should create new PO's instead of of old PO's (Without release strategy).
Some experts can share their experiance in this regard.
And how i should proceed further with this issue.??
Thanks

Hi,
You issue in your system has 2000Nou2019s purchase orders with release strategy has been triggered but 5 to 10 purchase orders do have release strategy.
& when you are creating a new PO with reference to old purchase orders (which release strategy has not triggered) and on saving NEW PO created with triggering release strategy.
Cause for above:
PO which release strategy does not trigger because the purchase orders are created before setting release strategy for PO. Those PO triggered release strategy and all are created after setting release strategy for PO.
Action:
Its completely business call for business users to go for options:
Option-- >1# You can use same old PO which release strategy does not triggered, do GR and all other process
Option-- >2# You can create new PO with reference old PO which release strategy does not triggered and upon saving you will have new PO number with release strategy triggered, then release PO & do GR and other related process.
Regards,
Biju K

Standard Workflow for PR Release Multi-level

Good day,
I have a multi-level PR release strategy connected to workflow and using exit M06B0001
Structure is as follows
Release Codes:
A1 - first level
A2 - first level (back-up)
B1 - second level
B2 - second level (back-up)
Objective: (upon creation of PR, Release Indicator = 0)
1. Notification Workflow to A1 and A2 for releasing
2. A1 or A2 releases PR. Release Indicator = 1 (for 2nd level)
3. Notification Workflow to B1 and B2 for releasing
4. B1 or B2 releases PR. Release Indicator = 2 (for PO processing)
#1 and #2 works. But does not proceed to 3 and 4. Return message after A1 or A2 release is "PR XXX Released".
How to solve this?

Hi RIck/Ragavendran,
Thanks for the response.
Am not using value as indicator for level. This is all under one release strategy.
A1 or A2 should release in order for B1 or B2 to proceed. Once any combination between A1/A2 and B1/B2 would result in PR fully released.
I've tried both scenarios of using and not using pre-requisites in my configuration. Both resulting the same.
Regards,

ECC6.0 upgrade issue with IDoc release

Hi experts,
we are in the process of upgrading our ECC environment from 5.0 to 6.0. We have quite a few interfaces which use ORDERS/Invoice Idocs in customised form. In ECC5.0 environment, we had developed a Z segment in the ORDERS Idoc and the segment release was set as 640. Everything worked fine in ECC5.0.
In upgraded environment, SAP has released new version of some segments. one of those is E1EDP01. This segment has 2 new versions in ECC6.0 environment - 007 and 008. This change in the version changes the data in the IDoc and hence interface goes in error at the EDI provider.
We have tried to use 640 as the IDoc segment release in the partner profile of the IDocs. This still gives us an issue because the 007 version of the segment E1EDP01 has release 620 and hence the Idoc picks up 007 version instead of 006 version as desired. When we change the partner profile with Segment release in the IDoc type as 46C, it gives us an issue in the Z segment saying that the IDoc segment is not released in 46C and the Idoc goes in error.
has any one faces such situation in the past? if yes, please throw some light.
Thanks in advance.

Hello,
Iam new to SAP. Thars why i cant understand well to do upgrade,
Then i found out some notes from internet about Upgrade : SAP Note Number 857904 (upgrade from Release 6. To 7.0).
In that notes,
Actually i would like to know about some key words (for example : ASSIGNING, REPLACE, TRANSFER. ) which how to work in the Release 7.0
Always i have some objets in 4.6C.
Ex 01: READ DATASET p_dataset INTO wa_record
Ex 02 : TRANSFER i_crhu TO p_crhd
LOOP AT i_crhd.
*disable controls in crhd
    PERFORM f_disable_crhd.
    TRANSFER i_crhd TO p_crhd.
    IF sy-subrc NE 0.
      MESSAGE a045.        "Error when transfering data to error file
    ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
CLEAR i_crhd.
CLOSE DATASET p_crhd.
IF sy-subrc NE 0.
    MESSAGE a039.                      "Error at close dataset
ENDIF.
OPEN DATASET v_crhd FOR OUTPUT IN TEXT MODE.
And then i have some FM (ex : WS_UPLOAD , WS_DOWNLOAD)
So I have changed the code for WS_UPLOAD by GUI_UPLOAD
                              and WS_DOWNLOAD by GUI_DOWNLOAD
now my problem is to know about some key word which how to work in ECC6 (for example ASSIGNING, REPLACE, TRANSFER. )
thanks in advance
Rathy

Multi Level Approval Workflow in OIM 11g R2

Hi everyone,
I want to develope a two level approval workflow in OIM 11g R2.
When I intent to provisioning a resource or an entitlement, this workflow will be executed.
This workflow is two level (serial approval)
First approver is manager of user, second approver is a custom group.
Is there any sample workflow like this?
How can I develope this?
Thanks.
Best Regards.

Hi, you can find the same in oracle assets link.
Download the guide for 11GR2.
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/id-mgmt/overview/workflow-development-1868162.7z
Thank you,
Shashi

Issue with retriggering Release Strategy

Hi all,
We have a one off situation here. We had already 10 release staragies in our system. We added 2 more release strategies with a new characteristic. We updated the characteristic value only for the new 2 release strategues and did not update the rest 10. Although now we had updated the characteristic value for remaiining strategies, the purchase documents created in the mean tme is not subjected to release strategy. To ensure business control we need to retrigger back the release strategy for almost 1000's of documents.
As any change to purcahsing document will retrigger it when done manually, but given the number of documents and as per Note 493900 we cannot trigger it by any backgoriund job to modify as below:
16. Question :
Why is there no release strategy determination when a program changes in
background a purchasing document which corresponds to the classification of
a release strategy ?
Answer :
This is the system design that a release strategy determination can only be
triggered through a user action and not by changes made in background
process.
If you create a document (e.g. PO, Contract, etc), the determination of the
release strategy takes place only in case of a user event like checking or
saving the document.
Kindly suggest any best practise to retrigger release strategy for the missing documents to ensure business control. Any easy and time savig measure to get it resolved will be appreciated.
Regards,
Anand Sampath

Hi Arnand,
After investigation by searching customer messages database ,I found
other customer has similar problem as the release strategy has changed
after creation of the SES please review the explanation from developer
:(whose release code is 03 )
When you try to revoke the acceptance of the service entry sheets
in ML81N or ML81, the 'Enter release code' pop up window appears, but
entering the code that is determined via the menu path Goto -> Entry
Sheet -> Release Strategy (which is the 03), the SES remains the same.
Nothing changes. The status does not vary and no error or warning
message is issued.
Checking the customizing for the release strategy, the release code
03 should have never been assigned to the SES 800024272 as the values
for the relevant characteristics were not included under that code.
I do not know how it was managed to accept the SES.
Now, when you try to revoke it, it seems that no release
strategy can be determined, not even including the values RCARESANO
and 012 between the valid values for the characteristics of the release
code 03 (RCARESANO as valid value for SUPERVISOR_SERVICIOS
(CESSR-ERNAM)and 012 as valid value for GRUPO_COMPRAS (CESSR-EKGRP)).
The only Possibility is to change now the SES so that the release
strategy can be re-determined by the system.This is the Only possible
way that the system can redetermine the Release Strategy , but it will
not be possible to do so as the SES is already accepted with the Old
strategy and it does not admit any further changes.
To be able to change it you would need to revoke the SES first,
but this Will also not be possible as the Release Strategy was changed
and the system still applies the old rules for determining the Release.
Solution to our Problem
The Only way to revoke the SES is to Restore back the Old Strategy that
was prior to 03 in the customizing.So now what will happen is that by
applying the Old Rules the System will be able to revoke the SES that#s
using the Old one. Once the necessary SES are revoked then go back to
customizing and apply the new strategy as it was did now, and
Change the SES and save , the new value of the Release Strategy will get
updated in the table ESSR and the field frgsx will now have 03.
Problems associated if the Release strategy is changed
Actually the release strategy is not supposed to be changed when there
are some documents in the System that uses it and even if you change the
Strategy the Old records will not get AUTOMATICALLY UPDATED by the
system.The Release Strategy routine has to run again to update the
values. This is Possible by changing the document SES ,
This change will happen only if the SES is not accepted and if its
accepted then you need to revoke and to revoke you need to restore the
old strategy , revoke and then change the SES , and have to go back to
customizing and Start using the New strategy from now on by doing so the
Routine will update the old record with the new strategy.
b) You may want to use CEKKO-BADAT(Requisition Date) or any other
structure in CEBAN or CEKKO and create a new release strategy
to differentiate the old release strategy.
Hope this helps,
Kind Regards,
Matthew

Escalation in multi-level approval

Hi all,
I have created a release workflow for an RFQ.I have used a rule to send mails for approval to different release levels
The escalation scenario follows :
If an L1 doesn't respond to the approval mail in 5 days, I need to send it to the next level(i.e L2) for release level L1 + L2 approval.
How do I proceed further for the escalation scenario.
Any input would be helpful
Thanks,
nsp.

Hi
Thanks for the reply.
What is the rule which i need to use in deadline monitoring to send the escalation mail to the L2 approver if L1 doesn't respond
Regards,
nsp.

Issues with syndication of multi-valued tuple fields

I'm trying to create a syndication map (using a schema) for a main table in MDM which includes a multi-multivalued tuple. The map generates an internal error on execution when I have the tuple fields mapped but executes correctly when I leave them unmapped. Has anybody else experienced this issue?

Hi Lori,
The Tuple syndication in MDM 7.1 works slightly differently than a normal lookup or Qualified mapping.
While syndicating tuple fields we cannot map the lookup Tuple field which acts as the linking field in the main table.
However you can map the tuple member fields and MDM syndicator allows you to map and syndicate them.
I have tried mapping and viewing the same and it works fine with me.
Hope It Helped
Thanks & Regards
Simona Pinto

How to retrieve comments from one OfficeTask activity and use them in another OfficeTask activity for Multi level Approval sequential Workflow

I'm designing a sequential site workflow using Visual Studio 2010 for Project Server 2010. In my case, I have following 6 stages in the workflow:
1. InitialProposal Stage
2. Approval Stage1 -- Needs approval from Approver Project Security Group Members1
3. Rejection Stage
4. Approval Stage2 -- Needs approval from Approver Project Security Group Members 2
5. Execution Stage
6. Completed Stage
Requirement is workflow should move to Approval stage2 from Approval stage1 if approved by all members of Approver Project Security Group1and it should move to Rejection Stage even if a single member rejects it.
Workflow should move from Approval Stage2 to Execution Stage if approved by all members of Approver Project Security Group2 and it should move back to Approval Stage1 on rejection by a single member of the group.
I'm using inbuilt PSWApproval content type and OfficeTask activity for creating approval task for the group members at both stages.
On task rejected in Approval stage2, task will be assigned again to Approval Stage1 and I want to show comments given by members of Approver Project Security Group2 to the members of Approver Project Security Group1 with this assigned task
but I'm not able to retrieve comments from officeTask activity.
My question is where exactly these comments are saved? how can we retrieve them and use them in another officetask activity? If this is not possible then what is the possible solution for meeting above mentioned business requirement?

Hi Paul,
Thanks for your suggestion.
By comments field I'm assuming OfficeTask.Comments field. Problem is, this field is always null. I tried accessing this field in CheckExitCondition activity as well as in OnTaskCompleted but in both the cases, it was null only(I wrote comments while approving
the task).
I used a code activity within OnTaskCompleted activity and following code for accessing Comments and Description fields:
public string officeComments;
public string officeDescription;
private void TaskCOmplete(object sender, EventArgs e)
CodeActivity Sender = (CodeActivity)sender;
Microsoft.Office.Workflow.Actions.OfficeTask ofctask1 = ((CompositeActivity)Sender.Parent).Parent as Microsoft.Office.Workflow.Actions.OfficeTask;
officeComments = ofctask1.Comments;
officeDescription = ofctask1.Description;
Please tell me if I'm doing anything wrong here, I'm very new to Workflows. Also, do I need to set any specific property of officeTask for retriving comments?
Thank you

Issue with using a multi-valued attribute in calculation

Hi,
I have the following two attributes for some calculation:
QTY (mdex:long-set)     VOLUME (mdex:long)
1^2^3^4^7                2
3                        4
I want to calculate the total volume with (MAX value of QTY in the set) * VOLUME.
It seems there is no built in function to calculate the MAX value from a set. So, for now, I am trying to calculate the same using ARB with the following qry:
DEFINE "myVW" AS SELECT
ARB(CASE WHEN IS_EMPTY("QTY") THEN { 0 } ELSE "QTY" END) AS "Quantity", /* QTY can be NULL */
ARB("TOTAL_PART_VOLUME") AS "UnitVolume" /* ARB to prevent "Source attribute must be aggregated" error */
"UnitVolume" * "Quantity" AS "TotalVolume"
FROM BASE_VIEW
GROUP BY "SOME_OTHER_COLUMN"
I am getting the folloing error: Cannot multiply mdex:long and mdex:long-set. I am not sure why "Quantity" is a multivalued field.
Is the above calculation possible at all? Or a better approach would be to calculate TotalVolume using a transformer in the integrator during data load?
Thanks in advance. I am using endeca version 7.6.1.
daich

Hi Daich,
Doing an ARB (or nearly any set based operation) on a SET will still return you a SET. In your case, it's a Set of one (which might be the least useful thing there is).
The only way you can really go from Sets to Members of Sets (which should be non-set types) is to do a GROUP BY MEMBERS(QTY). You could then do that plus some EQL gymnastics and get back to taking the max off of the grouped attribute.
Depending on your data volumes, this EQL could perform sub-optimally. You may want to consider adjusting your data model to account for this by having single-assign and multi-assign versions of the same attribute. It's a little tough to say if that's an option given your use case without more info though.
Regards,
Patrick Rafferty
Branchbird.

Performance issue with new release

Dear all,
11.2 rac with ASM on solaris sparc standard edition.
Client was using 10.2.0.3 on solaris 10 before and it is working fine.
after migrating the data to the new 11g instance ,we've a performance
degradation in the application. application forms 10.1.2.3 .Since we
are using stanard edition, there are not much options available for
tuning. the same application when tested with 11gr2 on windows (non-rac)
is more faster than the current prod and the newly installed ones.
I scheduled statspack and info from statspack
Top 5 Timed Events                                                    Avg %Total
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~                                                   wait   Call
Event                                            Waits    Time (s)   (ms)   Time
CPU time                                                     2,468          87.0
Streams AQ: qmn coordinator waiting for s           18         103   5742    3.6
gc cr block busy                                   295          89    303    3.2
control file sequential read                   235,472          70      0    2.5
reliable message                                 8,701          24      3     .9
Host CPU (CPUs: 32 Cores: 4 Sockets: 1)
~~~~~~~~              Load Average
                      Begin     End      User System    Idle     WIO     WCPU
                       1.20    1.37      2.43    1.25   96.32    0.00    0.91
Instance CPU
~~~~~~~~~~~~                                       % Time (seconds)
                     Host: Total time (s):                441,564.6
                  Host: Busy CPU time (s):                 16,239.3
                   % of time Host is Busy:       3.7
             Instance: Total CPU time (s):                  2,682.5
          % of Busy CPU used for Instance:      16.5
        Instance: Total Database time (s):                  3,249.6
%DB time waiting for CPU (Resource Mgr):       0.0
Memory Statistics                       Begin          End
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~                ------------ ------------
                  Host Mem (MB):     16,256.0     16,256.0
                   SGA use (MB):      4,078.9      4,078.9
                   PGA use (MB):        418.6        415.2
    % Host Mem used for SGA+PGA:         27.7         27.6
          -------------------------------------------------------------Objects are indexes are the same across the environment.stats are updated, but the process is time consuming in the new environment.
Please let me know how to proceed ?
Kai

Kai,
Please take a look in the sqlnet.ora file on the client computer, you should find it in network/admin directory. In that file, do you see either of these two lines?
sqlnet.authentication_services = (NONE)
sqlnet.authentication_services = (NTS)The above might explain why the configuration is fast on a Windows server, but slow when a Solaris server is accessed.
To Mark's point, execution plans can change between different versions - in fact Oracle Database 11.2.0.2 will perform something called adaptive cursor sharing, where an execution plan (you cannot check this using EXPLAIN PLAN from SQL*Plus) will potentially change as different bind variable values are supplied. However, if the application parses once and then holds the cursor open, the adaptive cursor sharing likely will not happen on future executions within that application - an unfortunate initial parse with unusual bind variable values might trigger a hard parse on 11.2.0.2 (thus possibly changing the execution plan), even when that SQL statement had been previously hard parsed. Randolf Geist recently posted an article related to this topic:
http://oracle-randolf.blogspot.com/2011/01/adaptive-cursor-sharing.html
Even with the Standard Edition of Oracle Database you still have a lot of options for troubleshooting this problem. In a 10046 trace file for a session look at the amount of time spent on the SQL*Net events. Do not look at just the summary provided by TKPROF, but look at the raw trace file. Is each SQL*Net related wait for a significant amount of time? If you do see long times for many of the SQL*Net waits, then you should focus your attention to the client, the server's network configuration, and the network hardware.
On the Standard Edition you can also look at the session level time model statistics and wait events to get a better idea of what is happening in the session. For example, if you have access to a spare Windows client computer you can try a script like the one in this blog article to help you review the time model statistics and dig into the session level time model statistics and wait events for a specific session:
http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/2010/02/09/working-with-oracle%e2%80%99s-time-model-data-3/
Charles Hooper
Co-author of "Expert Oracle Practices: Oracle Database Administration from the Oak Table"
http://hoopercharles.wordpress.com/
IT Manager/Oracle DBA
K&M Machine-Fabricating, Inc.

Issue with New Release Deploying Crystal Reports for Visual Studio 2010

Previously I created a deployment project with Visual Studio 2010 using the Beta 2 release of the distributable. This worked fine and installed on a 32-bit XP machine.
I've since updated the project to use the new Release version of the distributable CRRuntime_32bit_13_0.msi. Now when I run the installed program it gives me the following message -
"An error has occurred while attempting to load the Crystal Reports runtime. Either the Crystal Reports registry key permissions are insufficient, or the Crystal Reports runtime is not installed correctly. Please install the appropriate Crystal Reports redistributable (CRRedist*.msi) containing the correct version of the Crystal Reports runtime (x86, x64, or Itanium) required. Please go to http://www.businessobjects.com/support for more information."
I've had a look at verious posts and added code to the app.config file so it looks like -
<startup useLegacyV2RuntimeActivationPolicy="true">
<supportedRuntime version="v4.0" sku=".NETFramework,Version=v4.0"/>
</startup>
and also tried targetting various .NET frameworks, but without success.
Am I missing something?

Hello,
More info, are you installing on the same PC as the Beta was installed on or a clean PC?
Your app must be set to the full framework, not the client version.
Are you installing by right clicking on your setup.exe and selecting run as administrator?
Setting that option in the app.config is only required if you are using that driver you found the info on.
Run ProcessMonitor and set it to filter your installer and see what it reports.
Thank you
Don

Issue with ME28 - Release Purchase Order

Dear All,
One of our user is unable to release a purchase order through Transaction code ME28.
The role is assigned only with the Transaction Code ME28 with the correct Release code and Group.
We have tested from our end and see that the Auth Objects M_BEST_BSA and M_BEST_EKO are missing based on SU53. When we have added back it worked.
When i check in Su24 the Auth Obj M_BEST_BSA and M_BEST_EKO are not set to CHECK -> Value "NO".
I dont understand how this Transaction is working, when the behaviour of the Transaction ME28 is to release the purchase order why is the system asking for additional Auth Objects.
please advice.
Regards

Hi
M_BEST_BSA and M_BEST_EKO are not set to CHECK -> Value "NO".
If the check is not set to the standard delivered SAP what is the value in SU24 ? Has it been changed to CHECK > YES or DO NOT CHECK ?
I am sure you are aware that SAP does not deliver all objects coded in the programme under AUTHORITY-CHECK Statement in the SU24 Indicators with a CHECK > YES that are in transaction ME28. SAP only deliver a fraction of the values in the proposal as YES and the rest must be maintianed by the security team as they are discovered to be relevant to your organisations need of the particular functions within the transaction.This will then keep PFCG updated with all the CHECK YES objects the next time you add transaction ME28.
In other words all the objects listed in SU24 ( that are CHECK ) for ME28 will all be coded in the programme somewhere but it depends on which bits of the functionality within ME28 you are using that determines if they are called.

Issue with PO release (multi level approval)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for