Item search based on decision point status

hi,
i am trying add items to a review. i want to add only those items which are in a particular status of a decision point. Currently, i could not find any option in Add-> search when i am in review screen. Can there be any configuration through which i can get this or is this going to be a development.
Pls suggest.

I don't think there is any configuration to achieve this. Alternatively you can create a custom search help and configure it.
Regards,
Ravikanth

Similar Messages

Status Sync between Specification Header Status (PLM) and Decision Point Status (PPM)

This is what I'd like to achieve. Thanks in advance.
Status of Decision Point in PPM of the Portfolio Item updated to “QA Clear” when the Product Specification is “Retail-Ready."

Hi Shi,
Can you please elaborate the issue with some more details.
Regards,
Nishit Jani

Initiative Item Decision Point

Hi PPM Guru,
Is any way can we use Decision points on Initiative or Item approval process either similar to cProject Phase approval process or regardless of Decision point status management process?
Thank You.
Regards, Diana

Hi Diana,
Yes. You can approve (change the status) a Decision Point, similar to the Phase approval process. This can be done by DFM - Decision Flow Management. Once this is switched on for 'Status Synchronization' , each and every status change in the Phase can in turn trigger the corresponding status change in the Decision Point.
Regards,
Mohan Kumar D.

Decision Point change status

Dear Experts,
I'm trying to develop a report to modify the status of a decision point.
I have tried to use the standard function /RPM/DECISION_POINT_MODIFY and I've tried the method set_attributes of the standard class CL_RPM_DECISION.
In both cases, the return code is OK and apparently the status changed (looking the variables in debug mode) but once the report ends, the old status remains in the database (table /RMP/DECISION).
I paste the both ABAP code through I'm trying to change the DP status.
Please, could you tell me if I missed something or if there is something wrong?
thanks a lot.
Aupa.
ABAP Code:
When I'm calling the function /RPM/DECISION_POINT_MODIFY , I do:
ls_context-object_guid = wa_decision-guid.
ls_context-portfolio_guid = lv_porf_guid.
ls_context-parent_guid = wa_decision-guid.
CALL FUNCTION '/RPM/DECISION_POINT_MODIFY'
    EXPORTING
      is_context     = ls_context
      iv_language    = lv_lang
      iv_change_mode = lv_chg_mode
      it_comments    = it_item_desc_comments
    IMPORTING
      ev_rc          = lv_rc
    TABLES
      it_attributes = it_item_desc_attr_ins
      et_msg         = lt_msg.
and when I've tried to use the standard class, I do:
DATA:   lr_decision     TYPE REF TO cl_rpm_decision,
          ls_attributes   TYPE rpm_ts_decision_int,
          ls_decision_int TYPE rpm_ts_decision_int,
          lv_rc           TYPE i.
DATA: lr_object_manager TYPE REF TO cl_rpm_obj_manager,
        lr_common         TYPE REF TO if_rpm_common.
lr_object_manager = cl_rpm_obj_manager=>get_instance( ).
CALL METHOD lr_object_manager->get_appl_object
    EXPORTING
      iv_project_guid = i_item_guid
      iv_appl_obj_id   = i_decision_id
    iv_appl_obj_guid = i_decision_guid
      iv_appl_obj_ot   = 'EPO'
    RECEIVING
      rr_object        = lr_common.
lr_decision ?= lr_common.
CALL METHOD lr_decision->get_attributes
    IMPORTING
      es_attributes = ls_attributes.
Make sure that decision point is in edit mode
lv_rc = lr_decision->if_rpm_entity~set_edit_mode(
                     cl_rpm_co=>sc_edit_mode_change ).
IF lv_rc IS NOT INITIAL.
    RAISE error.
ENDIF.
Update status
ls_decision_int = ls_attributes.
ls_decision_int-status = i_status.
ls_decision_int-active = 'X'.
Set the DP attributes
lr_decision->set_attributes( ls_decision_int ).
Read new atrributes
clear ls_decision_int.
CALL METHOD lr_decision->get_attributes
    IMPORTING
      es_attributes = ls_decision_int.
e_status = ls_decision_int-status.

When you are using function module to change the decision point status, you must use /RPM/SAVE_CHANGES function module after /RPM/DECISION_POINT_MODIFY function module otherwise the changes will not be committed to database.
When you are using the classes , then you should use object manager ( cl_rpm_obj_manager) instance method do_save.

DFM Setup - Project Phase to Item Decision Point

Hi Folks,
I am trying to setup a one way status sync from Project Phase to Item DP (i.e. status is only managed in cProjects and should sync to Item DP).
I have done the following config.
1. Defined Portfolio Item Types and mapped Item DP to Template Phases
2. Maintained Phase to DFM business transaction in IMG Map Project / Initiative Business Transaction to DFM Business Transaction
3. Maintained DFM to Item DP mapping in IMG Map DFM Business Transaction to Portfolio Management Status
4. Under IMG Map Business Transactions for Synchronization I added a couple additional business transactions that I needed for Source PPCP and Target PPODP.
Examples entries of the above config for are as follows. This is to change the mapped DP status to 'For Approval' when clicking "Begin Approval" in cProjects phase
Map Project / Initiative Business Transaction to DFM Business Transaction
Source Grouping - PPCP Project Phase
Target Grouping - PPODP Portfolio Item Decision Point
Source Bus Transacction - DX11 Begin Approval of Phase
DFM Bus Transaction - IX05 Set 'To Be Approved'
Map DFM Business Transaction to Portfolio Management Status
Target Grouping - PPODP Portfolio Item Decision Point
Source Grouping - PPCP Phase (Project Management)
DFM Bus Transaction - IX05 Set 'To Be Approved'
Portf Mgmt Status - Z0006 For Approval (custom status that I created for Item DP)
With the above config when I begin the approval in cProjects, the mapped item DP is not updated. I have ensure that the next status of the DP is configured accordingly.
Appreciate any ideas on how to get this working.
Thanks,
Lashan

It looks like the issue is because when "beginning approval" cProjects status is "For Approval - Released",which means 2 status are active and the DFM business transaction does not trigger.
Wondering if anybody has the issue where cProjects has 2 active status and the subsequent statuses does not trigger DFM transaction.
Appreciate any help.
Thanks

Mapping of item decision points to PS Network/WBS

Hi,
In PPM 5.0, one of the new features introduced is the mapping of decision points to a PS Network or WBS element. In the configuration map item template to PS, we have the option of choosing the item type and a project definition. The first question that arise is, what are the pre-requisites. I press new entries, enter the item type. In the F1 for PS project it says to enter the field PSPR from the table PROJ. The project system module is in a different system. I have created the RFC destination for the system and in the definition of object links, I have mapped that system for both account assignment WBS element and Network. But the system is unable to fetch the project system project for mapping. Could someone explain the procedure for doing this, as it is not clear from the IMG help?
Regards,
swami

I checked the configuration guide.
In the IMG
Portfolio Independent settings -> Item template to PS project, under sub menu
Item template to PS project
Create new entries
Item template ID (chosen item template)
Object type : By default it shows 0INMPSPD
As per the configuration guide, "You must determine the SAP ERP system to be used for integration into PS by choosing an entry in the object type column". I do not see an appropriate entry for sAP ERP system even though I have created the logical system and RFC destination for the SAP ERP system in which PS resides.
Could some one help me out by guiding how to get the above setting done?
Regards,
Swami

Regarding Decision Point

Hi All,
We have a tab called 'Phases and Decisions' in an item screen. There a table is getting displayed with decision point name, ID, Status and few more fields. I need to find out the corresponding webdynpro for that screen. When i right click and click on more field help, it is giving the component name as SALV_WD_TABLE. But this component can be used for any ALV, now i need to know how the data is getting populated into these fields and possibly how the screen is getting generated. Can anyone help me?
Many Thanks,
Haritha

Hello Haritha,
There is generic WD component for all Dashboards,which is identified by the context and the object type. For 'Phase and Decision Point' Dashboard Object Type is PDP and the Parent Object can be RIH (Item) or IPO (Initiative). The WD Component for the same is /RPM/UI_DASHBOARD.
Thanks and Regards,
Piyusha

Pricing item 20 based on material of item 10 - can this work?

I want to determine a price for line item 20 based on the material# of line item 10.
If item 10 material = 123 and
item 20 material = abc,
item 20 price = $100 and because item 10 material = 123, discount = 10%.
How can I do this? I'm willing to create a field for the communication structure, but I don't know how it would work.
Thanks for any help!

Hi - In order to solve this require 2 steps need to be carried out:
1 - We need to create a routine for Alternative Base Value in the pricing procedure assign it to the condition type that you have created.
2 - You need to also use the higher level item feature in your contract/order to specify which item you will be using as the basis for your discount calculation.
**Alt Calculation type may not help you. Alt Basetype for Calculation is the key to solving this
Regards
Siddharth
<< Moderator message - Point begging removed >>
Edited by: Rob Burbank on Nov 26, 2010 3:05 PM

Find Item number based on Sales document and material in GTS system

Dear experts,
I have a situation where in I created a Sales order in ECC system and transmitted the document to GTS for compliance check.
Now, during my subsequent processing in ECC side, there is a situation where in I need to check if the document (at every item level) is blocked for any reason or is it good to go. But I do not have the item number in ECC side (at the point where I'm calling RFC to GTS to check). I only have sales order number and the material number.
So, can some one point me table level information in GTS side on how I could find the item number based on Sales document and the material (In our scenario all our materials in a sales order will be distinct).
Please provide me table information on where the sales document number, item number, material info are stored in GTS.
Thanks for your time
-Amit

Use these tables
/SAPSLL/CORREF
/SAPSLL/PNTPR
/SAPSLL/CUIT

Formatted search based on screen entry

Hi,
I need help to create a formatted search based on a field that the user entered on the screen. For example, I want a formatted search on the Purchase Order screen where the item search will only show the items where the vendor entered in the Default Vendor field of the master record is the same as the vendor specified in the Vendor field of the purchase order. Please advise on the correct sql statement.
Thanks,
Jane

Thanks Sudah! That worked!
However, I do not understand the syntax. What does [dbo] mean?
I am trying to duplicate the query for the following scenario.
I have a user defined field U_Freight in the Business Partner Master Data (OCRD) and also in the sales order screen. I want to create a formatted search for the freight field in the sales order to automatically find the freight from the business partner master data screen based on the customer entered in the sales order.
I have tried the following as a formatted search on the sales order screen, but it does NOT work.
SELECT T0.U_FREIGHT FROM [dbo].[OCRD] T0
WHERE T0.CardCode = $[$4.0.0]
Please advise.
Thanks!

Search based on email address

Oracle 10.2.0.4:
We have an indexed column "email_address" in one of the tables. So far we have been performing backend validation on the "email_address" column that doesn't impact the front end customer response times. Now we have a requirement to do some validation on email_address on a synchronuous front end request from customers for eg: Allow only 5 request per email address. My question is normal index sufficient for "text" based search such as email_Address or is there any other better way of performing such kinds of search? I just want to make sure that this email_address search doesn't become point of contention even though it's indexed.

Assuming that you are always looking for the exact email address that is stored in the table, a standard b*-tree index should be fine. If you start wanting to look for components of email addresses (i.e. show me all oracle.com addresses) or show me all email addresses with "jcave" in them or show me all addresses that have more than three characters in the top-level domain (i.e. [email protected] rather than bar.com), you may want to look into using Oracle Text to index the field. If you want to apply functions to the email address before searching (i.e. doing an UPPER(email_address) before searching to do a case-insensitive comparison), you may want to look into using a function-based index.
Justin

Update parent status based on all children status and sum of children amount.

Hi,
I need to write sql query for the following scenarios.
We have 3 financial systems (sys1, sys2, sys3) where a same transaction gets entered independently into each system OR entered into one and exported to the other system. Transaction need not be in all 3 systems.
We need to create reconcile report to see the status of transaction and display if it is reconciled or not. For this, in our stored procedure we are pulling data from 3 systems into temp tables and using CTE and other logic marking each transaction status
in each system temp table. One of the systems (eg sys1), we made it as source.
Sys1 temp table has both parent and child records and are distinguished using type. Sys2 and sys3 has only children records. When report is created, we are showing parent from sys1 temp table and
children from new temp table where children status is updated based on availability of it in all 3 systems.
DECLARE
@sys1 TABLE
ID int,
childID varchar(20),
ParentID varchar(20),
RecType decimal(3,0),
SettleDate smalldatetime,
Principal money,
Sys3ID varchar(16)
NULL,
Sys2ID int
NULL,
Status varchar(25) NULL
DECLARE
@sys2 TABLE
TxID int
PRIMARY KEY NOT
NULL,
CommonTransactionID varchar(16),
SettleDate smalldatetime,
Par money,
Sys3ID varchar(16) NULL,
Sys1ChildID,
Sys1ParentID bigint
DECLARE
@sys3 TABLE
Sys3ID varchar(16),
REFERENCE
varchar(16),
VALUE_DATE datetime,
DIRECTION char(1),
AMOUNT money,
RecSource varchar(2)
Insert Into @sys1 (ID, childID, ParentID, RecType, SettleDate, Principal)
Select 172876, 217955, 217954, 100, ‘2015-03-01’, 100.00
Union
Select 172877, 217956, 217955, 50, ‘2015-03-01’, 15.00
Union
Select 172878, 217957, 217955, 50, ‘2015-03-01’, 25.00
union
Select 172879, 217958, 217955, 50, ‘2015-03-01’, 10.00
Union
Select 172880, 217959, 217955, 50, ‘2015-03-01’, 10.00
union
Select 172881, 217960, 217955, 50, ‘2015-03-01’, 40.00
Insert Into @sys2(TxID, Sys1ID, settleDate, Par)
Select 4336620, 217956, ‘2015-03-01’, 15.00
Union
Select 4336621, 217957, ‘2015-03-01’, 25.00
union
Select 4336613, 217958, ‘2015-03-01’, 10.00
Union
Select 4336614, 217959, ‘2015-03-01’, 10.00
union
Select 4336615, 217960, ‘2015-03-01’, 40.00
Insert into @sys3(Sys3ID, Reference, Value_Date, Direction, Amount)
Select 1, ‘5654471 4336620’, ‘2015-03-01’, ‘O’, 15.00
Union
Select 2, ‘5654481 4336621’, ‘2015-03-01’, 'O',25.00
Union
Select 3, ‘5654491 4336613’, ‘2015-03-01’, 'O',10.00
Union
Select 4, ‘5654501 4336614’, ‘2015-03-01’, 'O',10.00
Union
Select 5, ‘5654511 4336615’, ‘2015-03-01’, 'O', 40.00
After going thru lot of other logic, final temp table will have only children with status assigned. The above temp table data is only for 1 scenario.
The following are status of children.
This is how status of children is determined:
Not Settled – All child records start as Not settled in temp tables.
Settled – when record exists in sys3 and other criteria is met.
Partially settled – record exists in sys3 and either in sys1 or sys2 or other criteria is not met.
Reconciled – child record should exist in all 3 systems and all criteria is match
Mismatched – record has wrong amount when compared in any of 2 systems.
**************** My Part below*******************
My part is to update the status of parent based on children status and parent amount must match sum of child amounts. If amounts don’t match, then leave the status of parent as null.
Determining the status of parent:
Not Settled – None of children has yet settled.
Settled – All children are settled.
Partially settled – some of children are as settled OR 1+ children are partially settled.
Reconciled – All children are reconciled.
Partially Reconciled – some children are partially reconciled.
Null – 1 or more childen has a status of mismatched.
AND sum of children amount should match parent amount
How can I update the status of parent based on all children and sum of amount of children equal to parent amount.
Thanks,
Spunny

>> We have 3 financial systems (sys1, sys2, sys3) where the same transaction gets entered independently into each system OR entered into one and exported to the other system. Transaction need not be in all 3 systems. <<
Your design is fundamentally wrong. In RDBMS, we want to have one fact, one way, in one place in the schema. The goal of all databases is to remove redundancy, not increase it. This not just SQL; this was true for hierarchical and network databases before them!
>> We need to create reconcile report to see the status of transaction and display if it is reconciled or not. For this, in our stored procedure we are pulling data from 3 systems into temp tables and using CTE and other logic marking each transaction
status in each system temp table. One of the systems (eg sys1), we made it as source. <<
You have re-invent the worst of 1970's file processing, but you want to use a temp table instead of scratch tape. This is not RDBMS or good SQL.
>> Sys1 temp table has both parent [sic] and child [sic] records [sic] and are distinguished using type. Sys2 and sys3 has only children [sic] records [sic]. When report is created, we are showing parent from sys1 temp table and children from new temp
table where children [sic] status is updated based on availability of it in all 3 systems. <,
The terms “child” and “parent” are not part of RDBMS. They come from network databases. You are building fake pointer chains we do have referenced and referencing tables. Or do you mean to model weak and strong entities? Where is the DRI actions?
These things are not tables! They have no keys, so they are called (garbage) piles. But even the garbage is wrong. There is no generic “id” in RDBMS; it has to be “<something in particular>_id” to be valid. Since you do not do math on it, it should not
be a numeric.
A “rec_type” is a nominal scale, so it cannot be a numeric either! Likewise, we have no generic “status”, but a status is state of being so it has to have a temporal dimension. And did you know that “reference” is a reserved word in SQL as well as another ISO-11179
violation.
The MONEY data type does not do correct math. Google it! It is another Sybase left-over that nobody should ever use.
Finally, you used the old Sybase INSERT INTO ..SELECT..), .. disaster instead of the ANSI/ISO Standard VALUES table constructor.
>> This is how status of children [sic] is determined: ..
My part is to update the status of parent [sic] based on children [sic] status and parent [sic] amount must match sum of child [sic] amounts.<<
Your narrative describes what Tom Johnston called a Non-Normal Form Redundancy. We do not put summary data in the strong entity; another basic data modeling principle. We build a VIEW that gives us the current summary. Your mindset is still in punch cards and
magnetic tape files.
"No matter how far you have gone down the wrong road, turn around!" -- Turkish proverb.
Can you start over and do it right?
--CELKO-- Books in Celko Series for Morgan-Kaufmann Publishing: Analytics and OLAP in SQL / Data and Databases: Concepts in Practice Data / Measurements and Standards in SQL SQL for Smarties / SQL Programming Style / SQL Puzzles and Answers / Thinking
in Sets / Trees and Hierarchies in SQL

BOM comparison based on Installation point of Subitems

Hi All,
Can I do a BOM comparison based on the installation position of the sub items?
There is an option to select the installation point in "sort by install point" in the "further selection" screen. But it is not getting populated in when I execute CS14. Please advice. Thanks.

Hi Mr.Pradeep Rao,
Could you please give me your mail id.
I will send you the screen shots, to compare the BOM's based on the sort by installation point.
The system is not showing directly in CS14.
Procedure: is once after doing the necessary settings under Further settings page,give the BOM details and VALID from date & click on Diff.Comparison.
In the next page,I hope you must be knowing the BOM item for which sub item exists. and the item quantity must be same in both the BOM's.
You will be able to see the symbol for that BOM item showing Similar component (Red Color Button).
Just Double click on that symbol(Comparison result symbol) and the system pops upa new screen,there you brach out the node -Sub Items-Comparison By installation Point.Now you can see the items based on installation point.
I hope in this way you will be able to see the items compared on installation point.
If this solves your problem ,Please reward maximum points and Close the thread as answered.
Thanks & Regards
Mangal

Decision Points on ibooks

Does anybody know if Decision Points is available on ibooks. I can't find it through my search but when I googled it, I found an article that said it would be available. Thanks.

The iPad is W's favorite gadget (per CNN), so it is ironic his book is not sold through iBooks. The Kindle app is not bad, but I just prefer the iBooks interface, the in-App bookstore, and the ability to get samples (saved me from some highly rated, poorly written books). I've got another book to finish first, then I'll check again on iBooks, just in case.
Best.

Enable a checkbox to create version in 'Report Vision' decision point

Hi,
I need to enable "Earmarked" checkbox to create a version when the item is in decision point called "Report Vision". Could anyone suggest how it can be achieved ?
I would like to know how and where this is defined
Regards,
Dhanu

closed

Item search based on decision point status

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for