Java LDAP Tag Query Issue

I am using the ldap tag library to view users and output info. There are specific attributes I want to pull back that it wont. The attributes are passwordretrycount pwdaccountlockedtime pwdfailuretime.

<ldap:property name="url" value="<%= \"ldap://\" + request.getParameter(\"ldapserver\") %>"/>
<ldap:property name="dn" value="<%= binddn %>"/>
<ldap:property name="password" value="<%= bindpw %>"/>
<ldap:connect>
<ldap:query id="var" basedn="o=tlhc" filter="<%= cn %>">
<table border="0" cellpadding="1" cellspacing="0">
<tr><td valign="top"><b>Last Name:</b> </td><td valign="top"><ldap:getAttribute name="sn"/></td></tr>
<tr><td valign="top"><b>First Name:</b> </td><td valign="top"><ldap:getAttribute name="givenname"/>
</td></tr>
<tr><td valign="top">Middle Name: </td><td valign="top"><ldap:getAttribute name="tlhcmiddlename"/><
/td></tr>
<tr><td valign="top">UserID: </td><td valign="top"><ldap:getAttribute name="uid"/></td></tr>
<tr><td valign="top">GUID: </td><td valign="top"><ldap:getAttribute name="tlhcguid"/></td></tr>
<tr><td valign="top">Employee Number: </td><td valign="top"><ldap:getAttribute name="employeeNumber
"/></td></tr>
<tr><td valign="top">Title: </td><td valign="top"><ldap:getAttribute name="title"/></td></tr>
<tr><td valign="top">Email: </td><td valign="top"><ldap:getAttribute name="mail"/></td></tr>
<tr><td valign="top">Password Retry Count: </td><td valign="top"><ldap:getAttribute name="passwordr
etrycount"/></td></tr>
<tr><td valign="top">Password Failure Time: </td><td valign="top"><ldap:getAttribute name="pwdfailu
retime" delimiter="<br>"/><br><br></td></tr>
</table>
</ldap:query>
</ldap:connect>

Is this the easyldap tag library?
i think it is the implementation of ldap operations in the tag library that causes it.
I m lookin for a tag library for the same use too.

Similar Messages

Tag query - Rowcount Property

Hi,
We are using SAP MII 12.1.5 ( build 83).
We have been connecting to a PI historian to get data and performing some calculations.
Since the client gives more important on the accuracy of data, we are using the history event mode.
( With history event , we could not get the results as expected)
While querying a particular tag, the value is not as expected.
After doing all the testing, We found out the For the particular period PI has some where around 18000 rows. and we are only getting 9999 rows since we have specified this in the tag query row count.
In the transaction I tried to increase the rowcount to 20000. It is not working.
The maximum count is 10000. After that the query gives unknown error Java LH exception.
Is there a limitation on the rowcount property?
If we fix the row count for a certain limit and the query returns more than those number of rows, how to get all data?
I am sure handling these huge number of rows is not a very good thing to do. But the algorithm to calculate the end result requires each and every data as registered in PI.
Any input is appreciated.
Thanks in Advance,
Kishore kumar P S

Hi Mike,
We have initially told about the performance issues if we go with this approach.
But once we have shown the demo last week, they agreed with the modified approach.
Now we are using the Statistics with TOT. Still the totalizer value is not taking effect.
As I know from the help docs, the totalizer factor is used to change the from one unit to another unit.
the help Doc says
"The area under the curve (effectively a "totalizer" value) can be calculated by multiplying the time-weighted average by the width of the time interval in seconds. However, quite often, the instrument or measurement is in different units (perhaps gallons per minute versus per second), and the TotalizerFactor parameter can be used to perform the correction."
But there is no effect on the totalizer value. There is one more point in totalizer value is depend upon the connector. We are using the UDC connector. Currently I am not getting anything on this connector type.
Any inputs will be appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Kishore kumar P S

SAP MII 14.0 Tag Query Findings

Hi Everyone,
We has just migrated from 12.2 to 14.0 MII, we did not got any issue in BLS or any Queries. The only issue we faced was the tag Query. So, after migrating from 12.2 to 14.0 we need to re load the Tag query and save it after migration to 14.0 otherwise it will not work as expected.
Am sharing as many of us may be working for Migration of MII 12.2 to 14.0, this may be useful.

Where are you querying the data from?
For example, if you're reading tags from an OSISOFT PI Historian, the "mask" attribute should be tag='AB*'
Note the single quotes!
The mask value in PCo queries is dependent on the "source" system masking procedure and format.

Dynamic Tag Query with dynamic tag name.

Hi,
In our implementation we have 10+ users. Each one want to monitor only one production line ( eg. one tag value ) in the dashboard by default when they login.
I was able to design this requirement CONCEPTUALLY but facing some trouble technically.
Here is my issue.
Tagname will be coming from one of the BLS Transaction input parameters (Transaction.Tagname). I am able to build tag query using xMII Tag Query block, able to configure repeater. Here is the spot where I was struck. While assigning tag value to XML Row
i.e IlluminatorRow_0.Tagvalue = Repeater_0.Output{/Row/AssetUtil1}.
In the above assignment link it requires a hardcoded tagname. In my case it will be dynamic. I tried different ways like
1. IlluminatorRow_0.Tagvalue = Repeater_0.Output{/Row/@Transaction.Tagname}.
2.IlluminatorRow_0.Tagvalue = Repeater_0.Output{/@Transaction.Tagname}.
But no luck.
Can someone help in how to do this dynamic tagname assignment.
Thanks,
Srinivasa.

Hi Srinivas,
another option is to use "Dynamic Links" which from your sample code is what you were trying to do. For this, the proper syntax is:
Repeater_0.Output{/Row/#Transaction.Tagname#}
Make sure that the tag name you pass to the historian is the same as the tag name returned by the historian as part of the data set, and make adjustments for that. For example, some historians escape non-alphanumeric characters when they process your request (e.g. passing "abc.def 12-rt" as the tag name can be returned from the historian as "ABC.DEF_12_RT", etc.).
Hope this helps,
Sascha

Tag Query Error

Hi,
I am executing a tag query and I keep getting the following error -
OperationList [ERROR] - Error Message: Pending requests found, current request will be retried at a later date
OperationList [ERROR] - Error updating
com.sap.xmii.applet.common.ResultModelException: Error Message: Pending requests found, current request will be retried at a later date
     at com.sap.xmii.applet.common.BaseApplet.getResultModel(BaseApplet.java:1089)
Can somebody explain what would be the cause of such an error and how to fix it?
Regards,
Chanti.

Actually, they have to be run in isolation because I can't load both projects in the OPC server at the same time. So, I can run the related MII applications only one at a time. But heres something I found in the UDS logs -
[P:4192, T:5000,       UDS, ] 0x0     HRESULT: 0x80070057 [Invalid at the top level of the document.
]     [Connection.cpp @ 1024, CLHOpcDaConnection::FinalGetMetadata]
[P:4192, T:5000,       UDS, RETHROW] 0x0     Rethrowing exception.     [Connection.cpp @ 1130, CLHOpcDaConnection::FinalGetMetadata]
[P:4192, T:5000,       UDS, RETHROW] 0x0     Rethrowing exception over COM.     [tagUtil/lhds2Connection.h @ 1427, lhds::LHDSConnectionImpl<class CLHOpcDaConnection>::GetMetadata]
[P:4192, T:5000,       UDS, ] 0x0     Caught exception over a COM boundry.     [tagUtil/lhds2NamespaceMode.h @ 174, lhds::LHDSTagListModeImpl<class CLHOpcDaDSTagList>::LookUpDescription]
[P:4192, T:5000,       UDS, HANDLED] 0x0     Handled exception.     [tagUtil/lhds2NamespaceMode.h @ 177, lhds::LHDSTagListModeImpl<class CLHOpcDaDSTagList>::LookUpDescription]
Does it make sense?

Error using a tag query

We have a tag query that works in our sandbox environment, but not in dev. I loaded the same JDBC drivers on both systems.
The project was exported from the sandbox, and imported into dev.
I have verified the Data Server set up is identical in both environments. Connection status in both environments is identical - running, same number of connections, etc.
When I try to run the query on sandbox in workbench, the query returns data. I get this error on the dev system -
SQL error has occurred on query java.sql.SQLException: [Microsoft][SQLServer 2000 Driver for JDBC][SQLServer]Invalid object name 'tag'.
Detailed error -
java.lang.Exception: SQL error has occurred on query [Microsoft][SQLServer 2000 Driver for JDBC][SQLServer]Invalid object name 'publicgrouptag'.
     at com.sap.xmii.Illuminator.gui.workbench.populators.IlluminatorPopulator.get(IlluminatorPopulator.java:114)
     at com.sap.xmii.Illuminator.gui.workbench.populators.TagListPopulator.get(TagListPopulator.java:47)
     at com.sap.xmii.Illuminator.gui.workbench.components.desktop.custom.TagQueryBuilderPanel$6.construct(TagQueryBuilderPanel.java:723)
     at com.sap.lhcommon.gui.ThreadCreator$2.run(ThreadCreator.java:94)
     at java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)
Any suggestions??

One of your included JDBC driver archives has a class that matches the path provided by the JDBCDriver setting for the data server (likely the sqljdbc.jar file).
If you take the JDBCDriver setting:
com.microsoft.sqlserver.jdbc.SQLServerDriver
and replace the periods for sub directories and add a .class on the end you'll have:
com\microsoft\sqlserver\jdbc\SQLServerDriver.class
So if you unpacked the jar file you'd find this java class (and the other ones included with the driver).
Do you get the same error about 'publicgrouptag' and 'tag' objects when you test a tag query request for GroupList mode? These tables/views would be used by the underlying queries used to populate the tag details tab in the WB. Do you see these tables or view within the SQL Server? Does the sa user have appropriate permissions?

MII 11.5 and PCo 2.1 and Tag Query Error

Hi,
I have KEPWare OPC server configured with a single tag, and with the OPC Client open. I have PCo 2.1 configured with a single agent, and 'legacy' ticked with port 9001. I have a UDS connector pointing to port 9001, and a tag query in 'currentwrite' mode, and can successfully write a value from the query editor (within MII 11.5) to KEPWare, when tested directly within the MII query editor.
However, when I call the same tag query from within an MII transaction, and set 'TagName.1' and 'TagValue.1' to the values I want, I get the following error:
"An item with the same key has already been added. at SAP.Manufacturing.Connectivity.Protocol.Custom.PCoQueryRequestHandler.ProcessRequest(Object handler)"
I see this error in the PCo log.
Interesting thing is, that within the transaction editor, when I select the underlying tag query, and the editor asks to generate the XML, and I say Yes, the underlying tag query runs fine (I can see the value getting updated within KEPWare).
I've also tried with/without subscription items in PCo, plus different settings for 'Cache Mode' in PCo, plus using fully qualified tag name (ie: channel.device.tag as KEPWare sees it), etc, but in all cases I get the above error.
Any ideas?

Hi Diana,
I upgraded to PCo V2.1.4.2, still same issue. And yes, the data server (UDC) is checked as "Writable"!!
As mentioned, the tag query runs fine in both "Current" mode and "CurrentWrite" mode. Only when I call the same query from a transaction do I see this error. Excerpt from Runner Log below;
2011-02-23 15:20:32,390 [ServletExec: request: time=1298434832343, uri=/Lighthammer/Runner]
ERROR Runner - [9FA68944-67CE-824D-3FA6-D96023119ECE][ERROR]:
IlluminatorQuery: An item with the same key has already been added. TMP0794C967-0F69-8F04-568C-CD037815D1D0
2011-02-23 15:20:32,453 [ServletExec: request: time=1298434832343, uri=/Lighthammer/Runner]
ERROR Runner - [9FA68944-67CE-824D-3FA6-D96023119ECE][ERROR]:
ACTION FAILED: End Action IllumTagQuery_0 : () TMP0794C967-0F69-8F04-568C-CD037815D1D0
If I leave the transaction Tag Query action (that calls the underlying tag query) without any assignment to TagValue.1, then there is no error, and the error as set in the aunderlying tag query is used. But as soon as I assign values to TagValue.1 inside the transaction, I get the error. I've tried passing a value via a local paramater etc, same issue.
Regards
Kevin.

CSCul66951 LDAP routing query fails when user name is the same (6 july 2014)

in the case CSCul66951 LDAP routing query fails when user name is the same it is mentionned that the version 8.0.2-055 correct this bug ? How come i don't see this version on my menu Available upgrades from my IronPort C370 ?
Is there someone on the support team that have try this LDAP query on a IronPort C370 with this version in the development lab ?
Do i have to open a support Case to have this version of AsyncOS ?
Best regards,
Benoit Belair
University of Quebec in Montreal

Yes - CSCul66951 - this was included w/ the 8.0.1-HP1, and is rolled into 8.5.6-074 GA release.
See release notes, resolved issues:
http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/security/esa/esa8-0/release_notes/ESA_8-0-1_HP1_Release_Notes.pdf
CSCun02766 - 8.5.6-063, which was superseded by the 8.5.6-074 GA release.
See release notes, resolved issues:
http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/security/esa/esa8-5-6/ESA_8-5-6_Release_Notes.pdf

Java & LDAP, "anonymous unbind" = err=80

Dear experts,
I've found something strange in my performance tests against DSEE 6.3
Please see below some explanations about this "issue":
I use a simple Java code to test my newly created directory server. When I use a search request with the anonymous user (i.e. Context.SECURITY_AUTHENTICATION="none")...I can notice that a connection code & an error code (A1 - Client aborted connection AND err=80 (unknown error)) are always present in the corresponding logs of this request!
When I use the ldapsearch command line to "simulate" the same request (anonymous), I can see that the logs are completely different (connection code is different AND there is no error code (err=80)), that is: "U1 - Connection closed by unbind client" ; Those last logs are really as expected!
When I use a bind user (Context.SECURITY_AUTHENTICATION="simple") instead of anonymous, both tests (Java and ldapsearch) produce the same result, and the connection code is always the same, that is: U1 - Connection closed by unbind client
Here are the two connection codes:
U1: The server closed the client connection because client sent an UNBIND request.
A1: The client has closed the connection without performing an UNBIND.
I've found this article (http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/jndi/ldap/operations.html) about "How LDAP Operations Map to JNDI APIs"....
We can see that the UNBIND operation correspond to the (Java) procedure: context.close()....this procedure being of course in my code!
Is there a way in Java to "bypass" this issue for the anonymous user?
Thanks a lot in advance.
Regards,
-Franck

I have updated the ldap java.schema with below entries, it is working fine
objectclass ( 1.3.6.1.4.1.42.2.27.4.2.1
     NAME 'javaContainer'
     DESC 'Container for a Java object'
     SUP top
     STRUCTURAL
     MAY ( o $ cn))

LDAP group query failure during per-recipient scanning, poss

I am trying to figure out what this is referring to:
LDAP group query failure during per-recipient scanning, possible LDAP misconfiguration or unreachable server
I can still send test messages from my e-mail.
Is it possible tht a user is trying to send in corectly..hmmm

If you create a LDAP debug log from within the GUI, this will give you a more in depth look into the query that is being sent to your LDAP server and also more important any errors that are being returned.
Great log for troubleshooting any LDAP related issues.

Regarding Sun Java System Application Server Issue with JVM

Regarding Sun Java System Application Server Issue with JVM
Hi
I have installed SJSAS9.1 on solaris system. I m trying to deploy war file which i compiled in windows enviorment by jdk1.5.0_05. Every time i got the following error :
type Exception report
message
descriptionThe server encountered an internal error () that prevented it from fulfilling this request.
exception
org.apache.jasper.JasperException: PWC6033: Unable to compile class for JSP
PWC6199: Generated servlet error:
[javac] javac: invalid target release: 1.5
[javac] Usage: javac
[javac] where possible options include:
[javac] -g Generate all debugging info
[javac] -g:none Generate no debugging info
[javac] -g:{lines,vars,source} Generate only some debugging info
[javac] -nowarn Generate no warnings
[javac] -verbose Output messages about what the compiler is doing
[javac] -deprecation Output source locations where deprecated APIs are used
[javac] -classpath Specify where to find user class files
[javac] -sourcepath Specify where to find input source files
[javac] -bootclasspath Override location of bootstrap class files
[javac] -extdirs Override location of installed extensions
[javac] -d Specify where to place generated class files
[javac] -encoding Specify character encoding used by source files
[javac] -source Provide source compatibility with specified release
[javac] -target Generate class files for specific VM version
[javac] -help Print a synopsis of standard options
note The full stack traces of the exception and its root causes are available in the Sun Java System Application Server 9.1 logs.
I have cheked jvm version on both system the only difference is :
Solaris points to jdk 1.5.0_09
Windows point to jdk1.5.0_05
Even i tried to run blank jsp also but again i got the same error.
Can any help me to sort out the problem or give me any idea so i can do something by my own.
Thanks in Advance
Gagan

Do you have ANT installed and available?
Thanks,
Kedar

How to compile and register a Java CFX tag with multiple class files?

All-
If this is the wrong forum for CFX questions, please let me
know.
I need to determine how to compile and register a Java CFX
tag that contains multiple class files. One class file implements
the CustomTag interface and the other class files implement various
supporting classes. All of the documentation that I have found
talks about using a single class file. I am assuming that a JAR
file will be involved, but I am not sure of the specifics.
Thanks in advance for your help.
-Josh

Yes, it will involve a jar. Use your java IDE (eclipse,
etcetera ..) to create a jar containing all of the classes. Check
your ide's documentation for how to create jar files. After you
have created the jar, place the jar in the CF class path so CF will
recognize it. For example the {cf_root}/WEB-INF/lib directory. CF
must be restarted before it will detect the new jar. After
restarting CF, register the CFX tag in the ColdFusion Administrator
using the name of the class that implements the CustomTag
interface.
Though it is worth noting you can also instantiate java
classes directly from ColdFusion (ie without using a CFX
tag).

How to pass 100+ tags in a single sql/tag query

<b>In my current application I have to pass 180+ tags in a single query to retrieve data from iHistorian.
I want to know how to pass more thatn 100 tags in a single SQL or TAG Query using OLEDB or UDC connectors.
If anybody has done it in the past ,please share with me and also let me know how to do it</b>

Currently you can only query a maximum of 128 tags, this is a hard limit and may be changed in future releases of xMII, but < 11.5 (im fairly sure 12 also) all have the limit of 128.
As for iHistorian with the OLEDB UDS, you can write a query that would return over 128 queries becasue this is an input limitation on the UDSs. (PLEASE DON"T ASK US HOW TO WRITE iHistorian QUERIES... we aren't experts in iHistorian).
Please note that though you can query over 128 tags, the performance may not be what you expect... This may take a very long time to return.
Martin

Dataset query issues twice if the dataset is connected to matrix and used in multilookup function

hello everybody.
could not find any information if this is an intended behavior:
dataset query issues twice if the dataset is connected to matrix and used in multilookup function
parameters in both queries are the same
ssrs: 2008 r2, sharepoint 2010 integrated
sharepoint 2010: september 2014 cu
thanks in advance
Sergey Vdovin

Hello, Wendy.
I prepared a very empty sample report for you to demonstrate the problem - with this report, i hope, there is no place to discuss the shrinking of time data retrieval.
There is one dataset, one parameter and one lookup function. The query is executed twice.
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<Report xmlns:rd="http://schemas.microsoft.com/SQLServer/reporting/reportdesigner" xmlns:cl="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sqlserver/reporting/2010/01/componentdefinition" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sqlserver/reporting/2010/01/reportdefinition">
<AutoRefresh>0</AutoRefresh>
<DataSources>
<DataSource Name="DataSource1">
<DataSourceReference>http://t005/ProjectBICenter/DocLib/IntegrationDBVdovin.rsds</DataSourceReference>
<rd:SecurityType>None</rd:SecurityType>
<rd:DataSourceID>7e554344-d6c2-48a5-a7f4-1d24608cb4b5</rd:DataSourceID>
</DataSource>
</DataSources>
<DataSets>
<DataSet Name="DataSet1">
<Query>
<DataSourceName>DataSource1</DataSourceName>
<CommandText>select 1 as temp, '$' as tempname</CommandText>
<rd:UseGenericDesigner>true</rd:UseGenericDesigner>
</Query>
<Fields>
<Field Name="temp">
<DataField>temp</DataField>
<rd:TypeName>System.Int32</rd:TypeName>
</Field>
<Field Name="tempname">
<DataField>tempname</DataField>
<rd:TypeName>System.String</rd:TypeName>
</Field>
</Fields>
</DataSet>
</DataSets>
<ReportSections>
<ReportSection>
<Body>
<ReportItems>
<Textbox Name="ReportTitle">
<CanGrow>true</CanGrow>
<KeepTogether>true</KeepTogether>
<Paragraphs>
<Paragraph>
<TextRuns>
<TextRun>
<Value>=Lookup(1,Fields!temp.Value,Fields!tempname.Value,"DataSet1")</Value>
<Style>
<FontFamily>Verdana</FontFamily>
<FontSize>20pt</FontSize>
</Style>
</TextRun>
</TextRuns>
<Style />
</Paragraph>
</Paragraphs>
<rd:WatermarkTextbox>Title</rd:WatermarkTextbox>
<rd:DefaultName>ReportTitle</rd:DefaultName>
<Top>0mm</Top>
<Height>10.16mm</Height>
<Width>139.7mm</Width>
<Style>
<Border>
<Style>None</Style>
</Border>
<PaddingLeft>2pt</PaddingLeft>
<PaddingRight>2pt</PaddingRight>
<PaddingTop>2pt</PaddingTop>
<PaddingBottom>2pt</PaddingBottom>
</Style>
</Textbox>
</ReportItems>
<Height>57.15mm</Height>
<Style>
<Border>
<Style>None</Style>
</Border>
</Style>
</Body>
<Width>152.4mm</Width>
<Page>
<PageFooter>
<Height>11.43mm</Height>
<PrintOnFirstPage>true</PrintOnFirstPage>
<PrintOnLastPage>true</PrintOnLastPage>
<Style>
<Border>
<Style>None</Style>
</Border>
</Style>
</PageFooter>
<PageHeight>29.7cm</PageHeight>
<PageWidth>21cm</PageWidth>
<LeftMargin>2cm</LeftMargin>
<RightMargin>2cm</RightMargin>
<TopMargin>2cm</TopMargin>
<BottomMargin>2cm</BottomMargin>
<ColumnSpacing>0.13cm</ColumnSpacing>
<Style />
</Page>
</ReportSection>
</ReportSections>
<ReportParameters>
<ReportParameter Name="ReportParameter1">
<DataType>String</DataType>
<DefaultValue>
<Values>
<Value>1</Value>
</Values>
</DefaultValue>
<Prompt>ReportParameter1</Prompt>
<ValidValues>
<DataSetReference>
<DataSetName>DataSet1</DataSetName>
<ValueField>temp</ValueField>
<LabelField>tempname</LabelField>
</DataSetReference>
</ValidValues>
</ReportParameter>
</ReportParameters>
<rd:ReportUnitType>Mm</rd:ReportUnitType>
<rd:ReportServerUrl>http://t005/ProjectBICenter</rd:ReportServerUrl>
<rd:ReportID>cd1262ef-eca7-4739-a2ce-d3ca832d5cd6</rd:ReportID>
</Report>
Sergey Vdovin

Tag Query error when assigning mode in Link Editor

Hi,
I am receiving the following error when I run a transaction that contains a Tag query. In my transaction I have set the tag query mode to be defined by a local property via the link editor. Then when I execute the transaction I get the following error:
"[ERROR] [TAG_QUERY_WRITE_TAG]com.sap.xmii.Illuminator.logging.LHException: Mode parameter was not found or is malformed"
I am on version 12.1.8 Build(43).
I import the project into MII 12.1.4 Build(53) and the transaction works as expected.
In the new verson of MII is there a bug utilizing the link editor to set mode? Or is there a specific way it wants the mode linked. (e.g. specific case)
Additional details:
I am trying to use the CurrentWrite mode. I have tried setting Current mode via the link editor and that isn't working either.
Any suggestions?
Thanks,
Justin

Hi Mike,
Please correct me if I understand the logic incorrectly. But here is what I am thinking....
I have configured my transaction to have this flow:
String_List_To_XML_Sequence --> Repeater_TagValues --> TAG_QUERY_WRITE_TAG
The String_List_To_XML_Sequence would contain String_List_To_XML_Parser_TagValues & String_List_To_XML_Parser_TagNames.
With this flow the logic would say that I will be running a seperate tag query for each tag value. So if I have 100 tag values that I want to send, I will run 100 tag queries. This doesn't seem the most efficient. Also if this is how you were thinking I would configure the transaction then I could use the following links:
Target Xpath: TAG_QUERY_WRITE_TAG.TagValue.1
Expression: String_List_To_XML_Parser_TagValues.Output{/Rowsets/Rowset/Row[#Repeater_TagInput.CurrentItem#]/Item}
Target Xpath: TAG_QUERY_WRITE_TAG.TagName.1
Expression: String_List_To_XML_Parser_TagNames.Output{/Rowsets/Rowset/Row[#Repeater_TagInput.CurrentItem#]/Item}
With this configuration updating 10 tags takes 2 seconds:
[INFO] Statistics [Load = 35 ms msec, Parse = 35 ms, Execution = 2015 ms, Total = 2067 ms]
With my old configuration updating 10 tags took 700 ms. (original transaction on 12.1.4 Build (53)
[INFO] Statistics [Load = 11.137 msec, Parse = 224.113 msec, Execution = 451.78 msec, Total = 736.62 msec]
Please let me know if I interpreted your thoughts incorrectly.
If there is a way to utilize only 1 Tag Query, then I am not sure how the transaction flow should be configured.
Thanks for your time,
Justin
Edited by: Justin M Brown on Jul 14, 2011 7:29 PM
Edited by: Justin M Brown on Jul 14, 2011 7:33 PM

Java LDAP Tag Query Issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for