JDev 10g production planned date?

Hi,
do we know the data when JDev 10g will be released?
TIA,
Tamas Szecsy

see some "frozen" comments on this at :
http://radio.weblogs.com/0128037/2003/12/16.html#a46
-Jan

Similar Messages

Jsp 2.0 and jdev 10g production (custom tags)

there are some examples at
http://otn.oracle.com/sample_code/tech/java/jsps/index.html
I have certian questions it would be great if some one would clear these for me..
In JSP 1.2 if we wanted to write the custom tag's we had tag classes that extend TagSupport or TagBodySupport and the doStart() and doEnd() tag with the evaluate body. I could spit out the complete html text on an encounter of a tag! but in the JSP 2.0 a doTag() seems to take care of the intracies! how??
Now with jsp 2.0 I want to do the same... say some thing like this ....
<tg:myTag list="${somelist}"></tg:myTag> and say in my tag handler class I know what to do with this list. May be I will create complete html code and will use jspWriter to write out the html inbetween these tags!!
I have downloaded the eStore example but this class
javax.servlet.jsp.tagext.SimpleTagSupport; is not imported. So I am not able to look at the SimpleTagSupport class.
If I am trying to run the example in jdev 10g production should I have to specify that I am using jsp 2.0 so that jdev knows not to use jsp 1.2? if so how can I do this.
Does all the examples provided use the OC4J standalone? Can I use the embedded oc4J instead?
regards.

After reading a bit more now I know how the tags work.
However from the example I see (eStore) an array called by name "products" is created and set on the jspContext. If I already have the list and want to pass on the list which is in a bean or a session or a request can I provide it this way.
<tag:myTag var=${bean.list}>
or
<tag:myTag var=${session.list}>
or
<tag:myTag var=${request.list}>in the .tld file I should specify the attribute var and whether it should be runtime evaluable.
and in the TagClass
private Collection var;
private String listName;
public void setVar(Colloection aList) {
this.var = aList;
public Collection getVar() {
return var;
public void doTag( ) throws JspException{
// do i always need to this next line ------
getJspContext( ).setAttribute(listName, getVar());
}so that in my .tag file I can use some thing like this
<c:forEach var="list" items="${item}">
<td>${item.subObject.name}</td>
<td>${item.subObject.value}</td>
</c:forEach>And finally... as and when a tag is encountered the .tag file contents corresponding to that tag is called to get the html text and all that text is printed out in the jsp page right (without the jspWriter "out"). How does the browser know when to stop? like doEndTag() function? are these functions implicitly called?
regards.

UIX table tag's attribute VALUE is missing in jdev 10g production

In JDeveloper 10g preview, I handled my table's navigation manually and need to set the table's tag attribute VALUE in order to keep the record range.
However, when i convert my project to JDeveloper 10g Production, eventhought the page is still working fine, but in the design windows will show that the uix page is in invalid state and I found that the attribute VALUE is no more supported.
Could anyone please help me and let me know how do i set back my record range? Thanks!

It turns out that you're running into a bug that will be fixed in the soon to be released version of JDev 10g. The good news is that it's a design time bug, so your pages will still work at runtime. You can even fix the bug yourself if you want. In JDEV_HOME\jlib there is uix2-schemas.zip. Inside of that is ui/table.xsd.
Add the below attribute definition inside of the complex type for the table, and you should be all set.
<attribute name="value" type="ui:unsignedIntExpressionType" default="1"/>
Hope this helps,
Ryan Pollock
UIX Team

J developer 10g production release date ?

In this forum (also in blogs) Many thread from jDev team said that release date is in Q3 2004
Q3 will finish tomorrow...(31/3/2004).
Is there any news about that...

Guys, believe us that we are trying to get this version out of the door ASAP. We are now going through final testing of what we believe would be the final version.
We'll make sure to let you know when we go production, just keep an eye on the JDeveloper home page:
http://otn.oracle.com/products/jdev
Or even better, add the JDeveloper RSS news feed to your favorite RSS reader:
http://otn.oracle.com/products/jdev/jdeveloper_news.xml

Bug: Jdev 10g - templateDefinition won't allow expressionLanguage setting

I've been migrating a set of pages from Jdev 10g Preview to Jdev 10g Production. I've got a UIX template (.uit) file with a templateDefinition like this:
<templateDefinition xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/uix/ui"
xmlns:ui="http://xmlns.oracle.com/uix/ui"
xmlns:data="http://xmlns.oracle.com/uix/ui"
targetNamespace="http://www.paslists.com/pas/templates"
localName="pasPageLayout"
expressionLanguage="el">
I get the following in the structure window:
Errors(1)
--- Attribute expressionLanguage not defined on element templateDefinition
Can anyone help with this?

I've managed to fix this myself, after reading about all the migration issues. It seems that the migration process copied some settings that caused Jdev 10g Production to map to some of the prior Jdev XML schemas and/or libraries. The solution was:
1) Make sure Jdev is closed.
2) Rename the <jdev_home>\jdev\system9.0.5.1.1605 to something else (just in case).
3) Open JDev. Say no to any Migration questions.
4) Open your workspaces (jws files) using the File->Open dialog
I'm assuming, of course, that these projects are already JDev 10g Production projects. If they are not, then I think the procedure would be:
1) Install Jdev 10g Production
2) Run Jdev 10g Production. Say Yes and migrate settings and projects.
3) Follow the steps above to fix the migrated settings.
This should get your projects migrated to the new formats without contaminating them with old libraries/schemas.
I'll repost if I find something that breaks due to this procedure. I do know that it resolved my error messages.

Sending Production Plan to Vendor / Supplier

Dear Sir
Ours is a production unit (assembly line) we use lot of components. So I want to know is it possible to send plan directly to Vendor by E-mail from SAP.
Thanks & Regards
Vishal

Hi Vishal,
Sending out Production Plan to Vendors by email is possible but given nature of dataset involved (not documents in form of Production Orders) it may not be a very feasible option. Instead either develop a report to extract relevant Production Plan data and send it out as email.
But better look at Supply Chain Collaboration applications like SNC Supply Network Collaboration that has Outsourced Manufacturing processes catering to these kind of supplier / vendor collaboration requirements.
Hope this helps.
Somnath

Planning data

Hi,
I am doing COAP Planning, Have created planning level on the basis of Sa;les organisation , planning packages on the basis of Years... now pls let me know in which all planning methods i need to define the parameter sets and how to input the planned data .
Thanks !

Hi ,
Sales Planning---
The process begins with the planning of target values, such as at the material
group level. Average prices and cost of goods manufactured can be determined
at this stage.
In the next planning phase, plan data is distributed top down. The plan data
for material groups is broken down into combinations of customer groups and
products.
In bottom up planning, the plan data can be entered manually for each sales
representative and then brought together in a single plan version.
In the fourth planning step, the additional plan data can be transferred to sales
and profit planning from other business areas, such as cost center accounting or
incoming orders.
After planning has been finalized, the plan data can be transferred to production
planning, allowing production plan data to be reconciled with sales planning.
Regards,
Arun

SAP PP (Production Planning) Master Data Definitions

SAP PP (Production Planning) Master Data Definitions and Transaction codes.

SAP PP (Production Planning) Master Data Definitions
• Factory Calendar
• Material Master
• Resource • Bills of Material (BOM)
• Production versions
• Master recipe
Factory Calendar: The factory calendar is defined on the basis of a public holiday calendar. The public holiday and factory calendar is a central module in the SAP System. It is assigned to a specific plant during the initial system setup and therefore used in many areas (e.g. in Logistics and in Human Resources) in the system.
Material Master: Material master comprises if all the basic data of the material for each department. The data covers all the relevant information required for the transactional flow e.g. sales, Planning, Production, Quality, Purchasing, Costing etc. Material master covers all the descriptive and control data and the flow of information depends on fields maintained within it. The integration of all material data in a single database object eliminates redundant data storage. Material Masters are created once and can be changed or extended whenever required
Bill of Materials: Bill of Materials or commonly called BOM is a formally structured list of components that make up a product or assembly. The list contains the material number of the component together with the quantity and unit of measure. BOMs are used in their different forms in various situations where a finished product is assembled from several component parts or materials. Resources: Resources are production facilities and persons involved in a production process that have capacities. They are subdivided into categories to specify their suitability for certain purposes or their use in certain processes
Product Versions: A production version determines which alternative BOM is used together with which task list/master recipe to produce a material or create a master production schedule. For one material, we can have several production versions for various validity periods and lot-size ranges. The production version determines the following:
• The BOM alternative for a BOM explosion.
• The task list (master recipe) and any alternate, as needed.
• Lot-size restrictions and validity parameters.
Master Recipes: A master recipe defines the following data that is required for the production of materials without relating to a particular order: processing steps, resources, material components, and control information for the process control level. Master Recipe enables to plan the production of materials (products). Therefore, Master Recipe is used as a template for process orders and run schedules as well as a basis for product costing. In a Recipe
• The Phases (work steps) to be carried out during production.
• The activities to be performed in the operations as a basis for determining dates, capacity requirements and costs.
• The use of materials during production.
• The use of resource.

Clear the History Data Automatically in Production Planning Table MF50

Dear Friends,
I have the problem to set the Production Planning Table (Txn MF50) to
clear the history data automatically. Currently, all the history data
in the planning table has to be cleared manually.
Appreciate your help.
Rgds
Zahari Yusof

instead of just removing the whole history like private browsing do, i just want to remove browsing/download history and form&search. i didn't want to remove cookies and active logins, heheh. thank you

How to Reconcile Production Planning & Controling Data

Dear Experts,
Currently we are implementing the below Production Planning & and Controlling cubes.
1. Capacity Load Utilization (0PP_C13)
2. Plan/Actual Comparison Operation/Work Center View (0PP_C03)
We have updated the data in C13 and cube and doing the reconcile with standard reports.
In R/3 which T codes are usefull for C13 and C03 cube data reconciliation.
Regards
Ramu

Dear Suresh,
The View of CRHD_V1 is not giving the available capacity information.
I need to reconcile available & Target capacity information WITH Plant and work center wise.
BW Query names are 0PP_C13_Q001 & 0PP_C13_Q002
Regards
Ramu

Incorrect product in the transactional cube for opportunity planning data.

Hi,
We're loading our Opportunity planning data of CRM in a transactional cube in BW side. Later this transactional cube data is then uploaded into a standard cube.
For an opportunity, user enter some planning data for a given product (A). which was duly stored in transactional and then later in the standard cube. Then user deleted the product (A) and entered a new product (B) on CRM side. However in the transactional cube, records for the previous product (A) also exist and the same flows to the standard cube as well.
Fyi, delta load mechanism is in place for loading of both types of cubes.
Could someone throw some light why the old item (product A) is still there in the cubes. coz this gives a wrong picture in the report, though the key figures for product A are 0.
Regards,
Nagendra.

A daily compression would remove the loading details of the cube that are visible to us for any back-tracking, Normally we do the compression for load requests older than 2 weeks.
But the suggestion is good, incase i do not come up with any other soln, will think of implementing this.
Maybe my delta load knowledge is not good enough.
Please answer the following.
What happens, when we're using standard data sources (with delta load) for loading data from (say) CRM to BW and for a given header guid, a item guid record is later deleted in CRM. On BW side, whether this item_guid record will still be present in the cube or be deleted.
Regards,
Nagendra.

[ANN] Oracle JDeveloper 10g production is now available for download.

It's probably worth a mention in this forum too ;-)
In case you haven't notice we have just released Oracle JDeveloper 10g production with a many new features that makes it the ideal Java tools for Oracle Application Server users.
Check it out at:
http://otn.oracle.com/products/jdev
A partial list of new features:
Visual layout editing for both JSP/HTML and Swing user interfaces.
Drag-and-Drop data-binding of business services to the user interface
Visual Struts-based page flow modeler
Declarative creation of business services based on EJB, TopLink, JavaBeans, Web Services, or Oracle ADF Business Components
Visual UML modeling with code generation
Code Auditing and Metrics
Hot-Swap Debugging
Improved code editor
XML Schema visual editor
Database development and Database modeling
One-Click deploy to Oracle Application Server, BEA Weblogic, JBoss and Tomcat
Web services development and consumption with support for WS-I
And much more.

Hi,
That is definitely a product manager - positioning question (forum ID: oalonso), so I'd recommend that you ask the same question in the SES forum. The Text team has been monitoring that forum and answering most of the posts there, so you'd probably be more likely to get your question answered.
Secure Enterprise Search
-Ron

Regarding planning data not available in reports

HI SdN,
In my reports I'm populating actual data and planning data.But as of now we have only actual data display's in our report.what we are doing is we are populating data in BW and analysing on the base of the product cutomer (compounded) combination which is coming from r/3.(groups and sub-groups which we are entering at r/3 )
So our report shows us on the base of groups and sub groups which we are entering at r/3 level.That all is working fine but our customer wants that planning data is also displays in the reports as of now it is showing not assigned values in report.
so my question is ,To display planning data for group and sub groups provided by r/3 on the basis of product and customer (though other reports are showing planning data) , I know that I need to include this compounded infoobject in bps cubes but shall I also need to consider this in the BPS functions?I'm confused here and not sure about this.
And is that mandatory to have that componded infoobject mapped from underlying ods for customer.Because as of now planning cube is only updated with BPS functions?
Could you pls advice?
R

Hi Rubane
If the actuals and planning data are in seperate cubes then you will need to create a multi over both cubes to report on them together. However your BPS planning must be done against the same infoobject for you to be able to report on them together. If you are planning against the same IO the groupings from R3 will apply.
Also include the infoobject 0REQUID as a characteristic restriction and restrict it to variable 0S_RQMRC (Most Current Data)
Josh

Problem with Exception Worksheet using Data from Supply Plan Data Table

I added a series for a flag that indicates whether product is sourced from multiple manufacturing sites for a given customer and item. The flag is on the supply plan data table because it depends on the scenario. I created an exception worksheet for when the flag is set but all combinations are being displayed. If the flag is not set for a given combo then "Selected Page Item has No Data" is displayed in place of the table. I want only the combinations that meet the exception to be shown. I tried setting up an exception worksheet for customer shipments which is also on the supply plan data table but saw the same issue with all combinations being displayed whether or not the condition is met. Does anyone know of any issues with using exception worksheets with the supply plan data table? I searched the documentation and saw that exceptions behave differently with promotion series but this isn't a promotion.
I'm using Demantra version 7.2. Thanks for any help!
Edited by: user9253208 on Mar 30, 2010 6:40 AM

Thanks. We have come up with a workaround. While the combinations on the left are not affected by the exception, the data in the main table is so we moved as many levels as possible into the table. The performance is slow but the data is more useful, especially when exported into Excel. I was hoping for a better solution but I guess we'll just have to stick with what we've come up with.

After 10gto11g upgd, 'Planning Data Pull Worker' perf is very slow

Hi all,
We upgraded database from 10g to 11gR2. We have 3 prod instances , they work together. They are ebiz, planning, and configurator. Some of you might be familiar with this kind of setup.
We are running 'Planning Data Pull Worker' in APS instance (planning) instance. This program "SELECTs" (and gets data) from EBIZ instance and "INSERTS" into planning instance.
But after upgrade, this works fine in one instance (PERF6) (half hr), and takes very long like 6+ hrs in another instacen ARCH6.
We figured where the problem is. A select statement.
"select count(1) from apps.MRP_AP3_SALES_ORDERS_V ;"
Eventhough this is not exactly the select been used. We simplified by just trying "count(1)" of the main view which as the culprit.
I am pasting trace of both instance where working fine (PERF6) and where it is taking too long (ARCH6).
Please have a look and help. We opened a sev-1 tar as well , still problem persists.
Thanks,
Gopal

=======================================
___PERF6 instance trace; Where it works fine._
=======================================
SQL> SELECT * FROM table(DBMS_XPLAN.DISPLAY_AWR(('87dtkqstb5adq'),'961766442',null,'ADVANCED'));
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
SQL_ID 87dtkqstb5adq
select count(1) from apps.MRP_AP3_SALES_ORDERS_V
Plan hash value: 961766442
| Id | Operation | Name | Row
s | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| 0 | SELECT STATEMENT | |
| | 29253 (100)| |
| 1 | SORT AGGREGATE | |
1 | 189 | | |
| 2 | NESTED LOOPS | |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
1 | 189 | 29253 (1)| 00:05:52 |
| 3 | HASH JOIN | |
1 | 185 | 29253 (1)| 00:05:52 |
| 4 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | |
1 | 176 | 29246 (1)| 00:05:51 |
| 5 | NESTED LOOPS OUTER | |
1 | 170 | 29245 (1)| 00:05:51 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| 6 | NESTED LOOPS | |
1 | 161 | 29245 (1)| 00:05:51 |
| 7 | HASH JOIN | | 60
90 | 654K| 19090 (1)| 00:03:50 |
| 8 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | FND_LANGUAGES |
20 | 100 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 9 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | FND_LANGUAGES_N1 |
20 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| 10 | HASH JOIN | | 62
46 | 640K| 19088 (1)| 00:03:50 |
| 11 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | OE_TRANSACTION_TYPES_TL | 12
97 | 37613 | 10 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 12 | NESTED LOOPS | |
| | | |
| 13 | NESTED LOOPS | | 41
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
03 | 304K| 19077 (1)| 00:03:49 |
| 14 | NESTED LOOPS | | 41
03 | 220K| 14517 (1)| 00:02:55 |
| 15 | HASH JOIN | | 41
00 | 104K| 9959 (1)| 00:02:00 |
| 16 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | MRP_DERIVED_SO_DEMANDS | 41
00 | 65600 | 17 (0)| 00:00:01 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| 17 | INDEX FAST FULL SCAN | MTL_SYS_ITEMS_SN_N2 | 15
59K| 14M| 1184 (1)| 00:00:15 |
| 18 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID| OE_ORDER_LINES_ALL |
1 | 29 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 19 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | OE_ORDER_LINES_U1 |
1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 20 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | OE_ORDER_HEADERS_U1 |
1 | | 1 (0)| 00:00:01 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
| 21 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | OE_ORDER_HEADERS_ALL |
1 | 21 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 22 | TABLE ACCESS BY INDEX ROWID | MTL_SALES_ORDERS |
1 | 51 | 3 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 23 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | MTL_SALES_ORDERS_N1 |
1 | | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 24 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | PJM_PROJECT_PARAMETERS_U1 |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
1 | 9 | 0 (0)| |
| 25 | INDEX RANGE SCAN | OE_ODR_LINES_SN_N2 |
1 | 6 | 2 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 26 | TABLE ACCESS FULL | AR_SYSTEM_PARAMETERS_ALL |
43 | 387 | 6 (0)| 00:00:01 |
| 27 | INDEX UNIQUE SCAN | GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS_U2 |
1 | 4 | 0 (0)| |
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
Query Block Name / Object Alias (identified by operation id):
1 - SEL$15993197
8 - SEL$15993197 / FNL@SEL$2
9 - SEL$15993197 / FNL@SEL$2
11 - SEL$15993197 / OTTL@SEL$2
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
16 - SEL$15993197 / MDSD@SEL$2
17 - SEL$15993197 / MSIK@SEL$2
18 - SEL$15993197 / OOL@SEL$2
19 - SEL$15993197 / OOL@SEL$2
20 - SEL$15993197 / OOHA@SEL$2
21 - SEL$15993197 / OOHA@SEL$2
22 - SEL$15993197 / MSO@SEL$2
23 - SEL$15993197 / MSO@SEL$2
24 - SEL$15993197 / MPP@SEL$2
25 - SEL$15993197 / OOL1@SEL$2
26 - SEL$15993197 / ASPA@SEL$2
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
27 - SEL$15993197 / GSB@SEL$2
Outline Data
/*+
BEGIN_OUTLINE_DATA
IGNORE_OPTIM_EMBEDDED_HINTS
OPTIMIZER_FEATURES_ENABLE('11.2.0.2')
DB_VERSION('11.2.0.2')
OPT_PARAM('optimizer_dynamic_sampling' 6)
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
ALL_ROWS
OUTLINE_LEAF(@"SEL$15993197")
ELIMINATE_JOIN(@"SEL$5C160134" "MTL_SALES_ORDERS"@"SEL$3")
OUTLINE(@"SEL$5C160134")
MERGE(@"SEL$335DD26A")
OUTLINE(@"SEL$1")
OUTLINE(@"SEL$335DD26A")
MERGE(@"SEL$3")
OUTLINE(@"SEL$2")
OUTLINE(@"SEL$3")
INDEX_FFS(@"SEL$15993197" "MSIK"@"SEL$2" ("MRP_SN_SYS_ITEMS"."INVENTORY_IT
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
EM_ID"
"MRP_SN_SYS_ITEMS"."ORGANIZATION_ID"))
FULL(@"SEL$15993197" "MDSD"@"SEL$2")
INDEX_RS_ASC(@"SEL$15993197" "OOL"@"SEL$2" ("OE_ORDER_LINES_ALL"."LINE_ID"
INDEX(@"SEL$15993197" "OOHA"@"SEL$2" ("OE_ORDER_HEADERS_ALL"."HEADER_ID"))
FULL(@"SEL$15993197" "OTTL"@"SEL$2")
INDEX_RS_ASC(@"SEL$15993197" "FNL"@"SEL$2" ("FND_LANGUAGES"."INSTALLED_FLA
G"))
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
INDEX_RS_ASC(@"SEL$15993197" "MSO"@"SEL$2" ("MTL_SALES_ORDERS"."SEGMENT1")
INDEX(@"SEL$15993197" "MPP"@"SEL$2" ("PJM_PROJECT_PARAMETERS"."PROJECT_ID"
"PJM_PROJECT_PARAMETERS"."ORGANIZATION_ID"))
INDEX(@"SEL$15993197" "OOL1"@"SEL$2" ("MRP_SN_ODR_LINES"."LINE_ID"))
FULL(@"SEL$15993197" "ASPA"@"SEL$2")
INDEX(@"SEL$15993197" "GSB"@"SEL$2" ("GL_SETS_OF_BOOKS"."SET_OF_BOOKS_ID")
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
LEADING(@"SEL$15993197" "MSIK"@"SEL$2" "MDSD"@"SEL$2" "OOL"@"SEL$2" "OOHA"
@"SEL$2" "OTTL"@"SEL$2"
"FNL"@"SEL$2" "MSO"@"SEL$2" "MPP"@"SEL$2" "OOL1"@"SEL$2" "ASPA"@"S
EL$2" "GSB"@"SEL$2")
USE_HASH(@"SEL$15993197" "MDSD"@"SEL$2")
USE_NL(@"SEL$15993197" "OOL"@"SEL$2")
USE_NL(@"SEL$15993197" "OOHA"@"SEL$2")
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
NLJ_BATCHING(@"SEL$15993197" "OOHA"@"SEL$2")
USE_HASH(@"SEL$15993197" "OTTL"@"SEL$2")
USE_HASH(@"SEL$15993197" "FNL"@"SEL$2")
USE_NL(@"SEL$15993197" "MSO"@"SEL$2")
USE_NL(@"SEL$15993197" "MPP"@"SEL$2")
USE_NL(@"SEL$15993197" "OOL1"@"SEL$2")
USE_HASH(@"SEL$15993197" "ASPA"@"SEL$2")
USE_NL(@"SEL$15993197" "GSB"@"SEL$2")
SWAP_JOIN_INPUTS(@"SEL$15993197" "MDSD"@"SEL$2")
SWAP_JOIN_INPUTS(@"SEL$15993197" "OTTL"@"SEL$2")
SWAP_JOIN_INPUTS(@"SEL$15993197" "FNL"@"SEL$2")
PLAN_TABLE_OUTPUT
END_OUTLINE_DATA
110 rows selected.
SQL> spool off

JDev 10g production planned date?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for