Jpegs Getting Reduced

I'm working on a book to be published through Amazon's CreateSpace and trying to do so with Pages for the first time (used Word previously). I have images that were originally 300 dpi PhotoShop files. I saved them as 300 dpi Jpegs and "inserted" them into Pages where they belong. Once inserted into Pages, I had to drag the size handles to make them smaller in size to fit on the pages. Does this decrease the resolution somehow?! CreateSpace's automated reviewer is flagging these images as smaller than 200 dpi (which they won't allow) - so how did they get that way?!
Thanks for any help!

I've been fighting this problem myself when trying make prototype ePub documents.
We write our documents mostly in Word and then send them out for printing. They are full of screen shots!
So here are our work arounds to publish for portable devices or laptops or home machines.
Pages is buggy; even Apples ePub template has quirks in it.
(1). If we start the document in Pages and EXPORT it as a pdf AND be certain to select SAVE HIGH RESOLUTION image option when it is exported the final document looks grand AND the pages will magnify when you double click on the page. The images will scale up along with the page BUT how grainy they appears depends on their original size and resolution. This is what we need on iPads an other iOS devices.
(2). If we write the document in Word (Windows) then we need to fool with Word's pdfs settings when we save the document. We are still trying to find the correct options. The extra problem here is how we get the screen shots that we need. Some of use PRINT SCREEN and then copy into MS Paint and copy it into the Word document via the clipboard (cut and paste). Some of use SnagIt and just copy the image into Word from the Clipboard (cut and paste). Some of us convert the image in SnagIt to JPEG or PNG and then insert the image.
Most of the time either option works reasonably well when the document is saved as a pdf. Naturally small images don't magnify well.
(3) We take the document from option (2) and open it in Pages. Some formatting is lost and we need to be careful of font substitution. Now we share/export the document with the high resolution image option selected. The document scales well in iBooks and the images seem to retain their clarity when magnified. This seems to work better than simple saving the original document as a pdf from Word.
(4). Use the ePub format. This makes everything easier for everyone. We don't need to worry about what machine our readers are using to read our documents. If our readers have iBooks then any audio or videos that we embed will work and URL's will launch their web browser. (I haven't tried other ePub applications like Nook or Kindle. The Firefox eBook plug-in will read the book but no audio or video will work.)
There are problems doing this with Pages.
Sometimes the formatting is lost in conversion and text and images aren't in the correct place.
Pages has a size limit of about 11Mbytes per chapter which is very easy to exceed with high res images and videos and audio.
This is the worst problem. The images do not magnify well. They look fuzzy. We can't have this. An image must enlarge clearly.
Summary.
For documents that will not need frequent revision or very important projects that need audio, video, URLs or need precise layout, we are going with Adobe InDesign.
For normal everyday use we are still sticking with Word exporting to pdf.
But we are still trying.
I hope that this helps and thank you for explaining Pages image size quirks. I'll look for them in the manual!

Similar Messages

When I move a RAW file from IPhoto to my desktop or Photoshop it changes to a jpeg and reduces in size. How can I get the Raw file across?

When I move a RAW file from IPhoto on my macbook pro to desktop or Photoshop it changes to a jpeg and reduces in size. How can I get the Raw file to move across?

I create separate folders based on the year and then the actual date of when I take images. You can make those folders anywhere on any hard drive that is connected to your Mac whether internal or external. I also use the Photoshop Photo Downloader that is included with Photoshop/Bridge and it will create the date folder so all I do is create a Year folder.
Open Bridge or click on the Bridge icon in PS and in the File menu item in Bridge select "Get photos from Camera". It can be a camera connected to your Mac or a memory card from a camera. A window will open and you then select the camera or memory card. Set the location they will be downloaded to, just the folder and you can Browse to a folder that you created, then in the "Create Subfolders drop down select what date stamp you want to use or or custom name or not to create subfolders at all.
I've never cared for iPhoto one bit. I tried it but found it way to restrictive. It likes to have full control over how you interact with your images.

Problem with gross requirement planning pir is not getting reduced

Dear Gurus
I am trying to use strategy 11 for a particular finished product.(having bom and routing)
In the material master I have set mrp type pd lot size ex .strategy group 11, mixed mrp 2,item category group norm, availabilty checking group 02 .
Then I made manually pir for that material in md61 with BSF requirement type .
Then ran the mrp for that material in md02.
Planned orders came .(In md04 screen that gross requirement line text also came as usual )Converted them to prodn order and then did the gr in mb31 with 101 mvt type. After doing the gr the pir should get reduced in md04 screen which is not happening . Where I am going wrong
Regards
Sandip Sarkar

Dear Sandip Sarkar,
                                  It usually happens run MRP and ckeck.
Strategy 11 in summary :-
1. Sales Order creation - no impact.
2. Goods Receipt - minus the quantity for the oldest planned independent in demand management.
   For e.g. if PIR is 100 and delivery 90, PIR becomes 10 (withdrawal 90).
3. Delivery - no impact as delivery is issue from sales order.
This strategy is particularly useful if you need to produce, regardless of whether you have stock or not. For instance, steel or cement producers might want to use this strategy because they cannot shut down production; a blast furnace or a cement factory must continue to produce, even if this means having to produce to stock.
You need to maintain the following master data for the finished product:
Maintain strategy group 11 on the MRP screen.
Set the Mixed MRP indicator to 2 on the MRP screen.
Maintain the item category group (for example, NORM) on the Sales Organization screen.
Maintain the Availability check field so that you perform an availability check without the replenishment lead time (checking group 02 in the standard system).
Strategy                                                        10
Stock is taken into account                           Yes
reduction of planned independent
requirements takes place during u2026   u2026 goods issue for                                                                                delivery                                  order (discrete production),
11
Stock is taken into account                          No
Reduction of planned independent
requirements takes place during u2026            ... goods receipt for a production
                                                                        order (discrete production),
for a planned order (repetitive
                                                                         manufacturing), or for a purchase
                                                                         order (trading goods).
Edited by: Vachanala Rajasekhar on May 7, 2010 11:55 AM

Sale order commitment amount not getting reduced

Dear Experts
Once the Sale order is created the SO committment amount gets updated in reports (commitment Vs Actual report) with"Forecast of Revenue" and Amount type 0100 (Original).
But after creation of Billing document (actuals) the same 'Forecast of Revenue' (commitment amount ) is not getting reduced with Amount type (0200). FM document is generated at the time of Billing document generation and the same is showing in reports from Invoice side.
The same cycle is happening in MM i.e, once PR/PO commitment will get reduced after actuals were happened.
Ex:
Ref doc     Item     Val.type text                       Amt type     Payment bdgt
100000     10     Forecast of Revenue     0100          100
20000     2     Invoices                          0100          100
Why SO commitment is not getting reduced in SD module?. Because of this reports are showing wrong.
Kindly suggest.
Thanks in advance
Rao

Dear Mar
Thanks for the support and tried all the possible ways but not able to find out the reaon:
a. FM Accounts assignments (CI, FC,Fund and BP) are same both Sale order and Billing documents.
b. There is no exits are activated.
c. It is happening all the sale orders and the reduction is completly missing.
d. For your reference please find the below commitment and Actuals report (FMRP_RFFMTO10X ).
Ref doc       Val.type text                    Amount type      CI              FC                Amount
100107       Forecast of Revenue              0100           100           ABC                 100
256487       Invoices                                   0100           100           ABC                 100
    Because of this when we check budget report the consumed amount is showing Rs. 200/-
e. And also we don't have any PGI concept, only after Sale order creation direct billing document will be generated.
Kindly suggest is there any configuration missing issue or something else.
Regarads
Rao

Stock on Hand at External finisher is not getting reduced after shipment !

hello all,
would like to take help from the oracle retail experts and friends to know
1. why does the SOH is not getting reduced at external finisher level when we are moving stocks from External finisher to Warehouse .
2. Due to this i hope there is an impact on avgerage cost when we execute the process from the same EF (where some SOH are available ) to Wh .
your thoughts and opinions on the same is high invaluable .
regards,
Deepak

hi
when your are making production it must come to project stock
in the item category (tan) or other you want to mention as q as special stock
that time only the stock will reduce after you are doing the pgi
Regards
Raj

App V 5.0 Package size getting reduced

After creating AppV package when i edit the package to delete the junk file / junk registry, the package
size is getting reduced.
For E.g. My AppV package is having 200 files and 30 registry keys with size of 260 MB. When I edit
the package -> delete 5 registry keys & 3 files from the package, the package size is getting reduced to 130 MB. This results in application failure.
Suggestions?
Thanks,

I'm also getting this problem. Has anyone come up with a solution? Thanks.

IPhone 3GS really have speaker volume problem coz in one year my handset is changed for 2 times coz of this problem every te my phone volume get reduced automatically

IPhone 3GS have speaker problem? Coz in last one my phone is replaced 2 times from apple
The volume get reduced in some days in last 2 months this is 3rd time when I have faced problem

I have had your exact problem with my old 3GS, now I cannot even get it to turn on, I still see that it is supposed to be charging though, but it never charges any so it seems.
I replaced the Lower Dock Connector Assembly back when it still charged while hooked to my PC, and it found it made no real difference.
http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B003Y5YXLK/ref=oh_details_o05_s00_i00?ie=UTF8&p sc=1
At this point I am not sure if I should replace the battery and hope for the best, or just junk the phone, I cannot really sell it if I cannot reset it...

Notification for points getting reduced

Dear All,
Is there any settings which I can enable to get the notification when the points get reduced.
Regards,
TP

Hello Ramagiri,
Thanks for the quick response.
I am asking for the any settings in the SCN to get notifications when the points are reduced.
Like when your post is rejected, you get a notification, so in the same manner do we get notifications when the points are reduced.
Regards,
TP

FIFO o/p frequency getting reduced by 2

Hi,
Background:
I was testing the aurora core from Virtex 7 to Artix 7 that i have designed.So in the Virtex 7 design a tx_fifo is present into which Virtex data is dumped which has to be sent to A7.
Basic Test Case:
So a basic test was to test using test pattern of ADC which i have.I could see this test pattern in A7.So the core is ok,i guess.
Now to test for large number of samples to see if i am losing any samples,i am giving 5 MHz RF(low frequency sine wave) to ADC which dumps sampled data into tx_fifo.Ideally i should get this 5 MHz sine wave in Artix also.
tx_fifo details : in : 128 bit vector out : 32 bit vector.
On ILA i'm debugging both these 128 & 32 bit vector.After exporting -> Matlab -> plotting in matlab i'm noticing that the frequency of sine wave has reduced by 2.
128 bit vector is ADC o/p & 32 bit vector is aurora core i/p.We should be getting same frequency for FIFO i/p & o/p.
This 32 bit vector,i'm getting at Artix side matches the frequency of 32 bit vector at Virtex side.So the core is ok,but why did frequency get reduced by 2 at the Virtex side itself ?
Why is this ?

Hello,
I think the following statement is causing problem.
P_OTF[] = P_JOB_OUTPUT_INFO-OTFDATA.
either give:
P_OTF[] = P_JOB_OUTPUT_INFO-OTFDATA[].
or
directly pass P_JOB_OUTPUT_INFO-OTFDATA into FM parameter.
This is because you are filling only header into P_OTF and NOT the Contents of internal table by the statement
P_OTF[] = P_JOB_OUTPUT_INFO-OTFDATA.
let me know whether it works.
Regards, Murugesh AS
have alook at this thread:
Re: SX_OBJECT_CONVERT_OTF_PDF
this may help you
Message was edited by: Murugesh Arcot
Message was edited by: Murugesh Arcot

Service PO commitment assigned to statistical IO is not get reduced.

PO is created with Account assigned to Internal Order stastically and Cost center as real cost object. Wih PO creation we check commitment in system
According to standard SAP, at creation of PO, system creates commitment & while doing GR/IR, system should reduce PO commitment and increase actual by that amount. Service PO is created for amount 239200 USD with Account Assigned Category K, Item category D, Account assigned to Cost Center & Statistical Orders (9 orders by approximate 11% ) So, initially there is commitment of 26000 USD on each service order. However from March 2009 onward business has done GR and IR for this PO approximate 50000 USD but nor commitment have reduced neither any commitment line item were posted in system.
As a result of it, business actual budget is fully consumed by (Commitment + Actual) and while doing IR budget deficient errors is received.
Here main problem is, non reduction of Service PO commitment while doing GR and IR.
Tried below approch so far.
CoAr / Order type Comitment acitive, Costcenter updates commitment and GL is valid on delivery date. Service PO order unit is JOB and commitment reduction is based on value match with PO details.
In order to test really probelm is with Commitment updation or reporting. I checked COOI and COSP with reference to object no.
but there is only one posting in line item of original PO amount and at total level there are two posting one is origiona one and seocind is with zero amount. but in both total line item for one of the peiod quantity is incomplete even after clicking Final Invoice.
Even after final Invoice ticked thre is not commitment line item gets posted in system. Even I run RKANBU01 program.
This is quite strange, if some one can give me other suggestion to proceed further.
With Regards
Nitin P.

1.on Statstical IO there is only one PO commitment which posted when PO originally created. After that once you do GR/IR with refrence to that PO system should reduce that original commitment and post actuals. So, I mean here while doing GR/ IR "Nor commitment is reduced neither any commitment line item were posted in system"
2. I mean here on ticking Final Invoice button system should ideally close original commitment of that PO, with this tick in system only original PO amount commitment line item is there and no any addtional line itme gets posted with values.
"Even after final Invoice ticked thre is not commitment line item gets posted in system"
I hope this would be clear. I due restrication in accss and Master data relevant issue, I am not able to replicate exact scenario in other environment. Let me know any one else have different opinion / understanding this will helps.
With Regards
Nitin P.

Service PO Commitment with reference to statistical IO is not get reduced.

PO is created with Account assigned to Internal Order stastically and Cost center as real cost object. Wih PO creation we check commitment in system
According to standard SAP, at creation of PO, system creates commitment & while doing GR/IR, system should reduce PO commitment and increase actual by that amount. Service PO is created for amount 239200 USD with Account Assigned Category K, Item category D, Account assigned to Cost Center & Statistical Orders (9 orders by approximate 11% ) So, initially there is commitment of 26000 USD on each service order. However from March 2009 onward business has done GR and IR for this PO approximate 50000 USD but nor commitment have reduced neither any commitment line item were posted in system.
As a result of it, business actual budget is fully consumed by (Commitment + Actual) and while doing IR budget deficient errors is received.
Here main problem is, non reduction of Service PO commitment while doing GR and IR.
Tried below approch so far.
CoAr / Order type Comitment acitive, Costcenter updates commitment and GL is valid on delivery date. Service PO order unit is JOB and commitment reduction is based on value match with PO details.
In order to test really probelm is with Commitment updation or reporting. I checked COOI and COSP with reference to object no.
but there is only one posting in line item of original PO amount and at total level there are two posting one is origiona one and seocind is with zero amount. but in both total line item for one of the peiod quantity is incomplete even after clicking Final Invoice.
Even after final Invoice ticked thre is not commitment line item gets posted in system. Even I run RKANBU01 program.
This is quite strange, if some one can give me other suggestion to proceed further.
With Regards
Nitin P.

Hi Nitin,
When in the purchasing document, the indicator goods receipt
non-valuated is NOT set, the commitments will take into account the
information from the GOODS RECEIPT booked against the purchasing
document in order to reduce the commitments. In this case
the commitment can be reduced fully by setting the final delivery
indicator in the PO item (EKPO-ELIKZ).
When the indicator for non-valuated goods receipt is set, then system
will use the invoice information in order to reduce the commitments.
In this case EKPO-EREKZ can reduce the commitment to 0.
For positions that are using quantity-based commitments (Customizing ->
General settings -> Check unit of measurement), the commitments will be
reduced based on the quantity invoiced and not in the value. In transaction CUNI, the unit of measurements used at PO ITEM
level must be set to value based commitment.
For the commitments reduction the base value used is always the local
amount. The commitments will be reduced according with the actual posted
amount in local currency and in order to reduce the committed value in
the foreign currency, system converts the actual amount in local
currency using the exchange rate from the purchasing document.
In transaction OKKP, the commitment management indicator must be
active for the given controlling area in the current fiscal year.
Cost centers: In transaction KS02, in register "Control", the
commitment update indicator must NOT be set.
Check also the attached notes carefully in order to solve
your problem:
735404    Delivery completed indicator, final entry sheet indicator
634298    FAQ: Commitment update in the service
772206    Commitment Update in Service Purchase Orders
639523    Commitments reduction behavior for Purchasing documents
534993    Short instructions RKANBU01
459509    FAQ: Commitments in purchasing
433597    Commitment update for services or invoicing plan
339264    IR plan:commts reductn for invoicing plan (net doc)
303610    Invoicing plan: commitments only reduced for period
204376    Commitments - valuated GR with value-based commitmt
165823    Incompl.reduct.PO commts in Cash Mgmt/Forecast
152571    Composite SAP note: Missing or incorrect commitments
Regards,
Edit

Import JPEG Getting Error!

I'm trying to import various files into FCSP 5. I can't import any type of file...jpeg, aiff, etc...I get this following error statement:
File Error: 1 file(s) recognized, 0 access denied, 1 unknown.
I don't know what it means. I have tried troubleshooting but i'm at a complete loss! Don't use final cut hardly ever because we have a Avid Symphony Nitrous HD along with a second bay that has Avid Media Composer. Please help!

Try converting the JPEGS to TIFFS or PNGs. FCP has some difficulty with JPEGS...sometimes. Plus they are highly compressed.
Shane

Putting video clips (mov) in to edit work place time line after photos (jpeg) getting error message, the importer reported a generic error. ? please help thanks

premier elements12, putting video clips (mov) in to edit work place time line after photos (jpeg) error message, the importer reported a generic error. ? please help.

TINA54
Thanks for the reply.
Some general comments...
Regarding:
THERE ANY WAY I CAN PUT MULTIPLE RANDUM TRANSITIONS IN TO THE TIME LINE WITH JUST ONE CLICK ? .
There is no transition choice for random transitions across the Premiere Elements 12 workspace Timeline. But, the Elements Organizer 12/Create Menu/Slideshow and its Slideshow Editor does have that random transition choice. So, one possibilitity would be to create your slideshow in Elements Organizer 12 Slideshow Editor and then move the slideshow into Premiere Elements with the Output of Edit with Premiere Elements Editor command.
Pending more details of the slideshow you are creating, I think that you would get your best photo quality and overall results staying with Premiere Elements 12 workspace (1080p) project and the transitions randomized manually.
perhaps applying the default to all (all at the same time),
using Timeline Menu/Apply Default Transition,
and then replacing transitions randomly for the random transition look).
Please let us know if any of that worked for you.
Thanks.
ATR

Rajesh/Sadhu/RobertoUrgent :- Open Sale Order Value not getting Reduced?

Hi,
   Upon Executing FD33 and clicking the status view for a Customer say XYZ , and then choosing EXTRAS-Open Sale Order . Say the value of open sale orders being shown is 75000. Even after closing the open sale orders (By Selecting VA05 and Putting reason for Rejection), and then also the Open Sales Order value is not getting diminished.
   What could be the reason ?
   Pls help.
Regrds,
Binayak
Message was edited by:
        Binayak Ghosh
Message was edited by:
        Binayak Ghosh

Hi Binayak,
As mentioned by you, running of Credit re-org program 'RVKRED77' is the only solution for this problem and it is known problem in SAP.
Some precautions
1. Always run the program in background by scheduling a job.
2. The idle time is around midnight when no user is working on SAP.
3. Some time the job fails as some other program may be updating same tables as this program. In such cases re-schedule the job at different time.
4. You may run the program 'RVKRED88' which will simulate without actual updation of credit values.
Hope this clarifies..
Regards,
Madhu.

Does the sound of your caller get reduced when you speak at the same time?

Hi everyone,
I'm noticing some strange behaviour of my iPhone 3G's audio on the O2 network here in the UK. Both O2 & the iPhone are new to me so I don't know which is the cause, but was wondering if anyone else has experienced this 'problem'? What happens is this:
When I'm on a call with my ear to the iPhone's earpiece (or using headphones) & I speak whilst the caller is speaking (or let's say I'm chatting to my wife in the same room as me whilst I'm listening to 'hold music'), I've noticed that *the volume & call-quality of the incoming line is often reduced*.
Initally this might not seem a problem, BUT, there have definitely been a view times when I've been in a noisy environment (such as street traffic, or my kids shouting & playing in the background) where I've missed things that the caller told me. In both these situations, I've noticed that the caller's voice has got quieter, sounded 'grainy' or even sometimes gone totally quiet until the sound from me (or my environment) has stopped. The 'problem' seems to right itself a minute or so of the call, but that's little consolation to the first 60 seconds of the call!
It's most noticeable on headphones by the way; As a test, I plugged in regular headphones to my iPhone (i.e. not the iPhone IEMs with the mic), called a landline phone-line with a pre-recorded message, then spoke into the iPhone's built-in microphone. Every time I did this, the incoming audio signal was 'turned down' &/or sounded gritty, then returns to normal when I (or my background noise) went quiet.
I don't think this is a fault with my phone. but more either an iPhone 3G hardware 'characteristic', v2 software bug, or network issue. (O2 said they've never heard of this before of course...)
If anyone else has the time to try this out please, I'd appreciate it
Thanks,
Jason

Hi Quickdraw,
Thanks for your reply.
I don't know this for sure, but I think it has EVERYTHING to do with bandwidth.
Yes, that makes a lot of sense... I was making calls on 2G/Edge at the time of my 'tests' rather than 3G, partly due to battery-saving but also that 2G still has much better coverage over here (just as you guys in the States seem to be experiencing).
I've done some more tryouts today, & noticed that if the 2G signal is really strong, OR if I switch to 3G & have a reasonable-to-good reception, the 'incoming-signal-dropping-out-when-I-talk' doesn't happen much at all...
So, the bandwidth thing does make sense, but it's interesting/annoying that it manifests itself as "one good-quality voice OR the other", rather than "full-duplex-but-not-so-great-for-both-voices" sound...
If anyone in the UK can feed back their experience with O2, I'd appreciate it please. (I never had this issue in the 10 years I was with Orange..)
Cheers,
Jason

Jpegs Getting Reduced

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for