JVC HDD video editing on Intel imac.

I purchased a JVC GZ-MG37AA camcorder last year and recorded a number of hours of video on overseas visits. It plays back OK on the HDTV. However I wish to edit out certain bits and save to a DVD for showing. This is when I discovered the software supplied with the JVC leaves a lot to be desired. I have been told about Streamclip 1.8 which I have downloaded and I also purchased the Quicktime MPED-2 player from Apple. Without some proper guidance I am unable to get these programs to operate correctly. Is there any way that I can import the MOD files into imovie? I have 6.0.3. I have read some feedback on the apple support which advises not to use HDD camcorders to edit. I appear to be a sucker. I would still like to edit my files even if the quality is not up to scratch. Any simplified suggestions would be appreciated as I am not tottaly computer savvy with video. Thanks.

I have just done a quick test for you converting the TS files from a DVD.
1. Drag the files onto Streamclip.
2. Go to File>Export to QuickTime.
3. In the window that appears change the Compression setting to "Apple DV-PAL", the Quality slider to 100% and ensure that the Frame Size has "DV-PAL" selected.
4. Try it with the Deinterlace box selected or not. If you select it the conversion will take longer and I cannot see any advantage in the clip I have converted.
You may need to experiment to find the best settings for your needs but the above will give you something to get started.
Ian.

Similar Messages

  • Screen redraw / video card issue intel iMac

    i've been having a screen redraw issue with an old-ish white intel core duo (not core 2 duo) iMac.
    the screen will periodically show what i like to call screen dirt, and some of it is persistant.
    i'm hoping it's something that doesn't require a visit to the apple store, as this machine is out of warranty...but it seems like it may.
    perhaps someone out there has had a similar issue and can ofer some insight.
    thanks.

  • Trouble with external FW HDD of 300gig with intel iMac - same HDD ok viaUSB

    every five minutes it stop functioning and finder hang. same drive connected to a G5 no trouble, and this same drive connected to th eintel iMac via USB no trouble.

    I have just done a quick test for you converting the TS files from a DVD.
    1. Drag the files onto Streamclip.
    2. Go to File>Export to QuickTime.
    3. In the window that appears change the Compression setting to "Apple DV-PAL", the Quality slider to 100% and ensure that the Frame Size has "DV-PAL" selected.
    4. Try it with the Deinterlace box selected or not. If you select it the conversion will take longer and I cannot see any advantage in the clip I have converted.
    You may need to experiment to find the best settings for your needs but the above will give you something to get started.
    Ian.

  • Largest Hdd in a Core Duo imac

    Hi,
    Whats the largest HDD the first generation intel imac will take?
    Will it accept a one or two terrabyte drive?
    Also, would i be able to use a sata 2 300mb drive in it (albeit at 150mb)?
    Thank you.

    There is no size limit.

  • Considering dumping my iMac for a PC used for DSLR video editing on Premiere CS6. Help!

    So I edit mostly 1080p DSLR footage taken from my canon T3i camera. I purchased a 2011 (the latest model) iMac a little over a year ago, upgraded the RAM to 12GB and it has worked reasonably well. I purchased the base model for $1200 which has a quad core i5 processor, 512mb of video ram, and a measly 500gb hard drive. The past couple of days I have come to the realization that I only use Adobe Programs for graphically intensive work (premiere, after effects, etc). I originally bought my iMac for final cut, but FCPX SUCKS and I switched to Premiere CS6 which works like a dream. Anyways, I'm a senior in high school and do lots of video editing (going to major in video production in college). I'm likely going to differ college for a year and continue my video production business (pretty informal) as well as video production internships at a couple companies (so don't suggest that I get a laptop for portability, not an issue). I just shot an entire wedding with 2 DSLR's and the footage takes up over 20% of my hard drive which is unacceptable. This is very troublesome for me and has been clogging up my computer considerably. I have realized it would make a lot of sense to sell my iMac and purchase a PC that's not only faster, but has much more space. I was ideally looking to sell my iMac for $1000, and from that get a better and faster PC setup for my video editing. $200 would be allocated for a 24" 1080p LED 5ms Asus monitor (from newegg) which would leave $800 remaining for the PC. Ideally it'd be nice to have a little cash left over. Some things that sound appealing to me are: an intel i7 quad core proccessor at least 3.0+ Ghz,  16 GB of ram (maybe 8 to start), 1 GB of video RAM (here is where I'm stuck, my Imac had a Radeon 512mb video card in it, but I've heard premiere runs especially well with nVidia CUDA cards? Don't really know too much about this stuff.) I have no idea what type of card to get, and if I would even see a performance upgrade from my iMac. For storage I'd like at least 2TB of space, should I get two seperate 1 TB drives? One for boot and software and another for video files? Anyways, I assume I can benefit from selling my 2011 i5 iMac to get a faster PC equivalent at a lower price since I mainly edit videos (which is pretty graphically intense) from an HD DSLR camera. I've noticed premiere rendering times on my mac are starting to get pretty slow these days. Ideally it'd be nice to buy a desktop (already assembled) maybe from HP for around $600 (not including the monitor). I'm not completely against building a PC from parts (since I know a friend who can do it for me) I just need help figuring out WHAT exactly it is that I need and would benefit from.

    Buy a Desktop Video Editing PC
    http://www.adkvideoediting.com/
    -ADK Kudos http://forums.adobe.com/thread/877201
    Build a Desktop Video Editing PC
    -http://ppbm7.com/index.php/intro-part-1
    -http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1098759
    -http://forums.adobe.com/thread/878520?tstart=0
    -http://forums.adobe.com/thread/815798
    -http://www.shawnlam.ca/2012/premiere-pro-cs6-video-editing-computer-build/
    -http://www.videoguys.com/Guide/E/Videoguys+DIY9+Its+Time+for+Sandy+Bridge+E/0xe9b142f408a2 b03ab88144a434e88de7.aspx

  • Importing video from Samsung a707 to new Intel iMac

    I've got a new Intel iMac with 3 GB RAM, 500 GB HD, and the Nvidia 256 graphics card... and I've just upgraded my cell phone to a Samsung a707, which has a 2 mp chip, and accepts microSD memory cards. With a 1 GB memory chip, it's supposed to be able to take about a one hour video. I can't find a firewire microSD card reader that would let me import the phone's videos into my iMac. It comes with an SD adaptor, so I could use a firewire SD memory reader too, I think. Does anybody have any suggestions about how I can get the videos on the microSD memory card into my iMac, and then edit them with iMovie?
    Thanks for your help!
    Tim

    Your problems may well be down to the way you connect your camera and in which order you establish a connection. If all else fails voltaic will get the files from your camera in AIC which will readily be imported into im08 for editing.

  • New 21.5 iMac for video editing - which graphics

    I am thinking of upgrading a 3 year old Intel iMac to one of the new ones. The only beefy think I want to do on it is video editing with iMovie. My main question is whether I would benefit significantly from specifying the ATI graphics rather than Nvidia for this task. I suspect that it will be more than good enough with the cheaper graphics, but any thoughts ?

    Simon (UK) wrote:
    Choosing a faster discreet GPU with its own memory is always the way to go, especially for video
    So is first class air travel and 5* hotels However, there is a law of diminishing returns on the cash outlay. If I admit it my 3 year old Mac is up to the job, but I like shiny new Macs. Just wanted a feel for whether I would actually notice a significant performance improvement between those machines when running iMovie.

  • Dual Core Intel iMac 10.5.5 suddenly sees no firewire video decks

    We have 7 iMacs used in a general area for students to digitize. This week NONE of them will see any sort of video deck or camera through the firewire port.
    I did repair permissions, unplugged everything for 10 minutes (including power), zapped the pram. They do not see a DSR-11 or JVC BR-50 deck nor a DVX100, AG-DV60 camera.(this is in either iMovie or FCP 6.0.5 and yes, I tried replacing firewire cables)
    I could see one having a problem, but 7 all at once? We are just back from break and did the 10.5.5 upgrade before we left fir Christmas. (We also did this to 18 G5 Intel power macs and they seem to be fine.)
    Any thoughts here folks? This definitely seems to be in the software somewhere, either with quicktime or Leopard since neither iMovie or FCP will recognize anything.

    Do you happen to have any other firewire devices on these iMacs? Even FW800? Although rarely mentioned, I have seen several Intel iMacs that would turn a deaf ear to DV devices when external drives were also attached simultaneously. Often removing the external drive(s) would resolve the issue, sometimes a reboot was also required.
    I have heard that a firewire hub in series may help to resolve the issue, and that it may be related to a timing or power problem on the firewire controller chip in these iMacs. I had also read it may lie in the DV drivers, because someone who booted his iMac into XP had no issues capturing to Premiere or Vegas!
    Since the FW 400 and 800 connectors are both driven from this same bus chip, I have to do camcorder captures to the internal drive, then copy them to FW800 raid once the camera is unplugged.
    I have been very frustrated by this in the year I've had this iMac, since I bought it to run FCP. Doing video you always need more storage space, and this is quite a limitation... I haven't tried 10.4.x to see if that resolves it; if Snow Leopard corrects it I will be the first to buy it!

  • Which of these would be the best iMac for video editing?

    Hello, pretty simple question, which of these 2 iMac configurations would be best suited for video editing? I want to use Final Cut Pro X and Adobe After Effects (not cutting edge effects just simple stuff).
    Option 1 - 21.5 inch
    3.1GHz Quad-core Intel Core i7, Turbo Boost up to 3.9GHz
    16GB 1600MHz DDR3 SDRAM - 2X8GB
    1TB Fusion Drive
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M 1GB GDDR5
    Option 2 - 27 inch
    3.4GHz Quad-core Intel Core i5, Turbo Boost up to 3.8GHz
    8GB 1600MHz DDR3 SDRAM - 2X4GB
    1TB Serial ATA Drive @ 7200 rpm
    NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M 2GB GDDR5
    For some reason Apple don't offer more than 1GB of dedicated video ram in anything but the maxed out 27inch. Personally, I’m not fussed about the bigger screen and  I would say that having the faster processor, double the ram and a fusion drive would be more beneficial than the extra gig in the video card  but I’m not 100% sure, what do you guys think?
    Thanks.

    If you do a significant amount of video editing the larger display is nice but not absolutely necessary. I’d also recommend an SSD or Fusion drive rather than the stock mechanical drive which really is dog slow. If you choose an SSD 8GB will be plenty though 16GB is better if you go with the smaller model.

  • Going from iMac to MBP retina for video editing

    I appreciate that this question probably gets asked reasonably regularly but I have a few specific points I'd like some help on.
    I've been using a pretty high specced iMac for video editing for a couple of monthes;
    Current model 21.5 - 2.8ghz with i7 processor
    250GB SSD
    16GB RAM
    I also run off a second 24inch monitor
    My main workflow is Premiere Pro 5.5 for editing, After Effects 5.5 for compositing and effects and Da Vinci Resolve 8 for grading. I push the software reasonably hard (footage doesnt stray above full HD res so far though, I use 5D mk2 video footage 99% of the time) and I've been super happy with how the iMac keeps up.
    The general work that the iMac has to chew through is - big Premiere Pro projects with a reasonable amount of dynamic linking with AE. After Effects is used for mostly compositing with quite a lot of visual effects. Resolve is used for grading with a lot of 3D tracking, noise reduction and normal grading stuff - same as the others...quite intensive).
    However..... I have no portable computer and not enough money to invest in a decent one in addition to the iMac. I don't go a week where having a good MBP wouldn't have been a massive help. I'm not a massive geek when it comes to macs. I appreciate that the iMac is a desktop and should outperform any laptop but there are loads of things on the MBP retina that seem to level the field. I'd look at the following spec;
    2.3GHz Quad-core Intel Core i7, Turbo Boost up to 3.3GHz
    16GB 1600MHz DDR3L SDRAM
    256GB Flash Storage
    As far as I see the MBP has;
    the better USB3 sockets (a godsend when you have 64 gigs of footage to download).
    More thunderbolt sockets (I could use two external monitors).
    Faster RAM (1600mhz against 1333mhz).
    Better screen res (although I have some questions on that).
    More graphics RAM (1GB against 512mb)
    So thats a lot of things that look better. Im not worried about the small 256mb HD as only the footage Im currently using will be on the MBP's HD itself.
    So my questions are as follows;
    How should the two units stack up against eachother performance wise when being given quite intensive tasks from Premiere Pro, After Effects and Resolve (the MBP just simply being a notebook.....the MBP having faster RAM....the iMac having a faster processor etc)?
    How should the graphics compare (the iMac having a 6775 chip with 512 memory and the MBP having a 4000 chip with 1GB memory)?
    How should the screens compare. The MBP obviously has a massive PPI boost but.....is the colour balancing meant to be good enough. So far I've been more than happy to use the iMac for colour grading).
    Am I asking too much of the MBP to run two extra monitors when at home...?
    Am I just being stupid getting rid of a desktop for a notebook as my main working computer...?
    Any help that you knowledagable people can give me will be massivly appreciated...
    Thank you!
    Alex

    I think the MBP Retina would outperform the 2011 iMac as far as CPU due to the updated Ivy Bridge processor. Since the CPU's are similar (hyper threading) the clock speed is important, but the MBP Retina can have TurboBoost of up to over 3GHz. That's faster. Remember, the iMac is still in the 2011 model. The MBP Retina is a 2012 model.
    GPU Wise, the NVidia GeForce 650 outperforms the Radeon 6775. http://www.notebookcheck.net/NVIDIA-GeForce-GT-650M.71887.0.html. Now, the Intel HD 4000 isn't really about performance (in my opinion), so if you do get the MBP Retina, turn off automatic graphic switching.
    Editing photo or video on the MBP Retina would be amazing. The display is really quite vibrant. Have you had the chance to see a MBP Retina in action? I would definitely do it, if you're serious about dropping that kind of cash.
    I don't think using 2 monitors is too much to ask at all; I would love to have a triple monitor setup with coding and that sort. But I can live with one . I also think it's a great idea to use the MBP as a desktop. I currently do it, and have been since January 2011.
    One other thing to add, you may want to look into a USB3 hub (with full speed), so you could hook up a large USB3 drive to store files on.

  • What is the best value iMac config for hd video editing.   I was going to go for i5 3.1 ghz with 4mb ram, but should I go further?  Thanks!

    What is the best value iMac config for hd video editing.?  I was going to go for i5 3.1 ghz with 4mb ram, but should I go further?  Thanks!

    You have it currently installed? Can you go to the System Profiler and click on Applications (will take a while to populate) - take a look at your FCP and check what it says on the right - Universal, Intel, or PPC? It'll look like this:
    If it's Universal or Intel, it'll run in Lion. However, the installer may or may not be PPC - that you may not know until you try to install. If you have it currently installed, then you could do what I did - move over all the files manually. I have a list of files for FCE and would assume they'd be the same with FCP: copy them from the old Mac and insert them in the very same spots on the new one.
    Here is the list for FCE:
    http://support.apple.com/kb/TA38198?viewlocale=en_US
    (It was published for an uninstall, but worked like a charm).

  • 2010 iMac 2.93 i7 27" or 2011 2.8 i7 21.5" - which will suit better long-term?  I do a fair amount of audio, video editing and photoshop, but I have a limited budget.  What's going to give the best bang-for-buck for the next 3-5 yrs?

    I do a fair amount of audio, video editing and photoshop, but I have a limited budget.  What's going to give the best bang-for-buck for the next 3-5 yrs?  My current machine is a 13" Macbook unibody 2.4 Core 2 Duo w/ 4Gb Ram so it's time to move forward with more power and screen real estate!

    Hello, Jeff
    I could never edit on a 13" screen. I'm currently using a 17" MBP i7 Early 2011 as a fast replacement to my aged 20" Intel iMac.
    Both systems are not that far apart on stats and you will find that processing HD video will rely highly on the read/write to your storage. Myself, I'd be eye balling the 2011 for the Thunderbolt port so HD Video export/compression doesn't take forever! Currently processing a finished HD project for DVD uses at most 20% of my total CPU capacity. The FW800 drive is the big bottleneck! (I know I need at least a RAID to see a real speed boost).
    How good your eyes are and your usage style would dictate if the difference in screen size make a difference to you.

  • Which iMac for Video Editing?

    Hi Folks,
    After about 7 years with my Dell 4550 I am close to making a purchase of a new Mac and leaving the Windows world - Yeah!!! My decision is now coming down to how much I should spend on the video card. Basically it is a 300-500 premium to upgrade to the discrete video cards compared to the integrated graphics in the 2.66 model (granted you do get a ~10% faster processor at 2.93 as well).
    What I am wondering is that for video editing (using iMovie) is there a significant difference in performance of the machine based on the video card? I do not play video games on the computer much as I have a Wii and XBOX already to have that area covered. Primarily I will use it for iTunes, iPhoto and HD Video (have a new baby we need to record!)
    So my choices are mainly these three configurations to select from:
    iMac, 24-inch, 2.66GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
    Part Number: Z0FP
    2.66GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
    4GB 1066MHz DDR3 SDRAM - 2x2GB
    1.0TB Serial ATA Drive
    NVIDIA GeForce 9400M
    $1599
    iMac, 24-inch, 2.93GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
    Part Number: Z0FQ
    2.93GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
    4GB 1066MHz DDR3 SDRAM - 2x2GB
    1.0TB Serial ATA Drive
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 256MB
    $1899
    iMac, 24-inch, 2.93GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
    Part Number: Z0FQ
    2.93GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
    4GB 1066MHz DDR3 SDRAM - 2x2GB
    1.0TB Serial ATA Drive
    NVIDIA GeForce GT 130 512MB
    $2049
    iMac, 24-inch, 2.93GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
    Part Number: Z0FQ
    2.93GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
    4GB 1066MHz DDR3 SDRAM - 2x2GB
    1.0TB Serial ATA Drive
    ATI Radeon HD 4850 512MB
    $2099
    Since I will not be gaming, are the more expensive video cards worth the premium in relation to video editing, iTunes and iPhoto main purposes of the computer?

    I wouldn't stress it much. I recently bought a new iMac, but for years I have been editing my home movies with iMovie on my old G4 eMac. Granted these are standard def movies, not HD, but the point is, a lot of video editing doesn't require a lot of video horsepower. Most of your time will be spent scanning through thumbnails, picking parts to cut out, etc. None of it requires fantastic video displays and most of the time you are not paying attention to the quality of the playback (as long as it isn't stuttering) and are more concentrating on the content to figure out what you want to keep, trim, edit, etc. 90+% of the time you are not actually watching a lot of video simply playing.
    So get what you can reasonably afford. If you can afford the best model, then go ahead and get it. But if money is a little tight and you have to make some tradeoffs, with digital video you will want to put money towards storage. Hard drive space gets used up FAST. So get the 1TB upgrade and invest some cash toward one or two large external hard drives (one dedicated just to storing your video and then the other for back ups, extra misc. storage, time machine, etc.). Fortunately external hard drives these days are about $100 give or take per Terabyte. For the drive you will want to use for your video work, I suggest spending the extra cash and getting a model with Firewire 800 connection, not just USB.
    Have fun,
    Patrick

  • Hi, I need a video editing software for my Power Mac G5 system. Hunted all over for one! Can anyone help me and point me in the right direction. Everything I come across is for intel based systems. Many thanks in advance.

    Hi, I need a video editing software for my Power Mac G5 system. Hunted all over for one! Can anyone help me and point me in the right direction. Everything I come across is for intel based systems. Many thanks in advance.

    I have Final Cut Studio V1 - the PPC/Intel V5/5.1 cross-grade version, which would suit your requirements perfectly. (I have it for sale at present down here).
    If you keep looking, you're sure to find a similar second hand copy in your area, without the need to upgrade your graphics card.
    I'd go for Final Cut Pro as above over any version of Express. FCP has the full version of LiveType - not the truncated version that was released later on.

  • Apple aware of video problem in the new Intel iMacs

    Macworld Daily News
    Thursday - February 09, 2006
    Apple investigates Intel iMac Front Row problems
    By Macworld staff
    Apple has confirmed it is aware of, and investigating, reports of video problems in the new Intel iMacs.
    Recent reports claimed that some users had experienced random horizontal lines and other video playback problems when playing video in Front Row.
    "Apple is aware of this issue and is looking into it," the company said in an email to a web-based pressure group that has been gathering information on the problem. "If a customer has any technical issues, they should contact AppleCare."
    The problem is allegedly software-based.

    "Sure, I'd be more understanding had it been an issue that required a very special set of conditions to trigger"
    Apparently it does as this issue is not affecting all users.
    "As I was told, affected owners would not be proactively notified"
    Where you you prefer them to use their limited resources, trying to figure out who MAY be affected and sending them some sort of detailed action plan, or spending the resources determining the cause of the issue and developing a solution that can be distributed to the ones who need it not only now, but those that may discover the issue next week?
    I can understand that you are frustrated, and don't blame you for feeling that way, but this is an all new piece of technology and bugs are going to come up that were missed in testing. No company can afford to test at a 100% level. To do so would drive the costs so high as to make it impossible to sell the product, especially to the market the iMac is aimed at. Apple has a pretty darned good track record of resolving issues quickly when they appear. Until they do you only have a few choices. Use the workaround until the solution appears, waste time complaining about it, or sell the iMac and purchase a different product. That's really about all you can do!
    It was good of you to spend your valuable time, and yes it is valuable, trying to help the engineers or service reps solve the issue. That they spent that much time with you should show their commitment to solving this issue.
    Be patient, give them a chance, they have not had long to try and figure this out.

Maybe you are looking for