KE27 msg k/846 system checks entry date

Dear all,
We are testing KE27 to transfer actual COGS for period 2011/7.
One of the billing document was failed to find actual COGS.
The message says "k/846 unable to determine actuall cost for period 008".
The billing document was created today Aug 1.
To me it looks like system checks entry date than posting date in my case.
Did anyone have the same problem before?
Please let me know how to solve it.
Thanks~
Best regards,
Sharon Chen
PS. MM period was shifted to Aug. before movement 601 was done.

Hi Sharon,
on the entry screen of KE27 there is a check-box labelled "periodic valuation". The F1-description for that box reads:
"If you select this function, valuation is executed using the original posting date for the line item being revaluated, as opposed to using the date when the transaction was executed"
Obviously, you ran KE27 with that box un-checked.
Regards
Nikolas

Similar Messages

Remote system monitoring entry- data not relayed to Central system

Hello Folks,
I am trying to establish a central monitoring system for our client. I am trying to test it in the DEV environment first.
The central system is a Solution manager system (Dual stack- ABAPJAVA). I am trying to bring in monitoring data from the ECC development environment (ABAPJAVA).
First of, i created to RFC connections in Solution manager system, one for data collection and the other for analysis. I have maintained the host address of the ECC system as target.
Then i have created a remote system entry in Transaction RZ21--> technical infrastructure entered the 2 RFC names and have executed the function.
At this point i am only trying to bring in ABAP stack monitoring data form the ECC system so i have not generated the CSNCONF file.
Now when i look in Solution manager RZ20-->CCMS monitoring templates, i can't see any data for the the ECC system.
I guess i am doing something wrong. Am i looking in the wrong monitor set?
As additional information: Solution manager (SMD) and ECC (ECD) use different transport domains / transport groups. I dont know if this makes a difference.
Can some one please help.
Regards,
Prashant

Hi Prashant,
if I understand correctly your system shows only MTEs from R/3 Stack, not from the OS side, pls check your SAPOSCOL. Are the data in OS06 in your remote system correct and do you see the current data, refredhed all 10 seconds?
To check your environment, pls do the following:
in th efirst step check in RZ21 > in the Topology part the System Overview for your system connection to your back end system. Are the Read Destination Data RFC and the Destination Analysis RFC correct and works the authority chek fine?
In the second step pls check in RZ21 > in the Agents for Remotey SAP Systems part; are there registered your remote ccms agents correctly and works the connection test.
Stop the agents and in your RZ20 monitor pls enter STAT in your command field. Are there displayed for your MTE nodes the read RFC destinations?
Start the agents and and in your RZ20 monitor pls enter STAT in your command field. Are there displayed for your MTE nodes the CCMS Agent RFC destinations?
To rebuild the Monitor in the CEN system you could try to reset the node of your remote system in the warm up status > go in the remote system to RZ1 > go to local segments > change to edit > select your segments > reset segment in "WARMUP" status.
In the CEN system you coul try to go to the edit mode for the Agents for Remot SAP Systems > select your remote system and push the button Reinitialize Agents
In the back end system you can try to delete all MTEs in RZ21 > menu Technical Infrastructure > Reorgenize Segment Table > select the options with "ALL" in the CEN and the remote system to reorgenize all data.
Could you pls post for the missing MTEs a screenshot on the one side from the CEN system and on the other side from the remote system...
and last but not least you could try the following for missing OS MTEs
delete ALALERTS, ALMTTREE and ALPERFHI in /usr/sap/ccms/<SID>_<SNR> and check in the agents folder all trace and log files for errors.

Check duplicate data entry in multi record block,which is a mandatory field

Dear all,
I have a situation where i have to check duplicate data entry(on a particular field,which is a mandatory field,i.e. it cannot be skipped by user without entering value) while data key-in in a Multi Record block.
As for reference I have used a logic,such as
1>In a When-Validate-Record trigger of that block I am assigning the value of that current item in Table type variable(collection type)
as this trigger fire every time as soon as i leave that record,so its assigning the value of that current time.And this process continues
then
2>In a When-Validate-Item trigger of that corresponding item(i.e. the trigger is at item level) has been written,where it compares the value of that current item and the value stored in Table type variable(collection type) of When-Validate-Record trigger.If the current item value is matched with any value stored in Table type variable I am showing a message of ('Duplicate Record') following by raise_form_trigger failure
This code is working fine for checking duplicate value of that multi record field
The problem is that,if user enter the value in that field,and then goes to next field,enter value to that field and then press 'Enter Query 'icon,the bolth Validate trigger fires.As result first when-validate record fires,which stores that value,and then when-validate-item fires,as a result it shows duplicate record message
Please give me a meaningful logic or code for solving this problem
Any other logic to solve this problem is also welcome

@Ammad Ahmed
first of all thanks .your logic worked,but still i have some little bit of problem,
now the requirement is a master detail form where both master and detail is multirecord ,where detail cannot have duplicate record,
such as..........
MASTER:--
A code
A1
A2
DETAIL:--
D code
d1
d2 <-valid as for master A1 , detail d1 ,d2 are not duplicate
d2 <--invalid as as for master A1 , detail d2 ,d2 are duplicate
validation rule: A Code –D Code combination is unique. The system will stop users from entering duplicate D Code for a A Code. Appropriate error message will be displayed.*
actually i am facing a typical problem,the same logic i have been applied in detail section ,its working fine when i am inserting new records.problem starts when i query,after query in ' a ' field say 2 records (i.e. which has been earlier saved) has been pasted,now if i insert a new record with the value exactly same with the already present value in the screen(i.e. value populated after query) its not showing duplicate.................could u tell me the reason?and help me out...............its urgent plzzzzzzzzz
Edited by: sushovan on Nov 22, 2010 4:34 AM
Edited by: sushovan on Nov 22, 2010 4:36 AM
Edited by: sushovan on Nov 22, 2010 8:58 AM

Document entry date = system date, confusion for mult country implementatio

Hi All,
We are implementing in US and Malaysia. The server is located in Malaysia. The time difference between US and Malaysia is 16 hrs. Thus when US users enter documents and want to get the list of documents posted, the have to convert their time to the Malaysia time and then put that specific date and time. This is confusing even though we have maintained the time zone for the user.

HI Paul,
The user setting mentioned by you, helps in the determination of the posting date. My query is with regard to entry date. For e.g the server is in Malaysia. one company is in US. Thus when the user in US needs to check their document based on the entry date, they cannot check based on the time and date based on US date, they have to conver the entry time and date to the server time and then put in the selection criteria to get the document list...Hope this clarifies my query.

Record entry date - using system date as default not working

Hi,
I have a form which allow users to enter the information... I want to have a field to save the date when they've updated the record...
in order to accomplish the above, here is what I did:
1) I created an item on the form (put the source as table_column that I am using to save the record entry date on the table)...
2) In the Default field I put "sysdate" to capture the current date...
3) I made the item "Display only" so that no one should be able to change it...
so far so good... when my users open the form they see current date populated in the form...
my challenge is that when user saves the form, everything that they enter saves except for the "record modification date"... Not sure if it's due to date format or something else causing it, the date format on my form is DD-MON-YY and seems like the format on my table is DD/MM/YYYY... if it's the date formatting issue then please advice how to fix it...
I've saved a sample on APEX.ORACLE.COM for your review and comments... Here are the log in details
Workspace: tparvaiz
Username: [email protected]
Password: tparvaiz
Application: 28899 Default Date and White Space
Appliaction Page No: 24
ID/PW: TEST/TEST
Thanks

Hi,
Default value only used when item value is null. So when you fetch the from it gets the value from database column and omit the default value. I use trigger to store audit information i.e. create date, username etc.
Here is an example if you want to use -
The following trigger will capture the date and username and store into the table.
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER TRG_BI_TABLE_NAME
BEFORE INSERT
ON TABLE_NAME
REFERENCING OLD AS OLD NEW AS NEW
FOR EACH ROW
BEGIN
/* change the column name as of your table */
:new.create_date := SYSDATE;
:new.created_by := v('APP_USER');
END;This trigger will store user information and date when record been updated -
CREATE OR REPLACE TRIGGER TRG_BU_TABLE_NAME
BEFORE UPDATE
ON TABLE_NAME
REFERENCING OLD AS OLD NEW AS NEW
FOR EACH ROW
BEGIN
/* change the column name as of your table */
:new.update_date := SYSDATE;
:new.updated_by := v('APP_USER');
END;Hope this helps,
Regards,
Tajuddin
web: http://tajuddin.whitepagesbd.com

How to Create an R/3 source system and load data from there

Hello All,
Till now I have only worked with Flat files. I want to create an R/3 source system and extract data from there on to my Info Providers.
Does anyone has detailed steps for that. I am using BW 3.5 system
Thanks n Regards,
Abhishek

1. Type Transaction WE30. Check iDoc types
2. Type Transaction SM59. Maintain RFC destinations
a.) Open the RFC Destinations. b.) Find your Source System and double click on it. c.) Technical setting should contain information regarding yoursource system d.) Logon Information should contain source system client and name & password for you remote logon. We use RFC_SAB for BW logon to R/3 and RFC_AAE for R/3 logon to BW. Password for both is always xxxxxxx. e.) Execute your 'Test Connection' & 'Remote Logon'. You should NOT be prompted for a password, if you are then the logon info is incorrect. f.) Repeat above to verify RFCs for other systems (CRM etc)
3. Type Transaction WE21. iDoc Processing Ports.
a.) Select 'Ports' and then 'Transactional RFC'. b.) Click on the Port # for you source system. c.) Verify description & SAP R/3 version.(BW 2.1C should be release 4.x) d.) RFC Destination should be one created in SM59. If non-existent then create one
4. Type Transaction SE16. Data browser (for R/3  BW Connections)
5. Type Transaction SM30. Msg Types & Assignment to iDocs
Enter 'EDIMSG' in the Table/View field. Click on the 'Enter Conditions' option for Restrict Data Range. Click 'Maintain'. Select Message Type. Then enter 'RSSEND' in "From' field. Verify that the Basic Type matches what is in your RSBASIDOCtable for each of your connections. If any are missing any entries you must create them as follows: Create another session and type Transaction WE30. Enter IDoc Type (ZSBAXXX) in Obj. Name field (Suggestion: Start new type with 'ZS' + Transfer Structure Prefix + (3)#'s) Select Create. Select "Create from Copy'. Enter 'RSSEND" in 'Copy From' field Enter Description (i.e. IDoc Type for BW Development) Execute (Green Check). Repeat for other missingentries.
6. Go to the SM30 main screen. Clients Overview
Enter 'T000' in the Table/View field. Click 'Maintain'. Verify correct Client and Description. If incorrect enter.
8. On BW Type Transaction WE20. Partner Profiles
9. On R/3 Type Transaction WE20. Partner Profiles
10. Check all is correct

Employee information missing in CAT2 time entry data view

Hi,
We upgrade our system and when we go to time entry data view, we lost the employee information like Personnel number and cost center which displayed before upgrade.
I checked with Tcode CAC2, nothing found. But My guess is Personnel number and Cost center will be coming default.
Please let me know, where I can look in to it.
Thaks
Ral

Hey Guys,
You should ensure that for any configuration, the Modifiable and Influences you have a Hide entry. This way you will not be able to show the field. Kindly check the on CAC2 these both sections:
- Modifiable
- Influences.
Thank you.
Regards,
Bentow

Wanted brief idea about posting date, document date, entry date

Hi guyz!
basically am an tech consultant. But wanted to have brief idea about the following business process. scenario is like this:
in inventory management, we are doing some inter facility transfer. i.e., for a particular plant, we are having multiple storage locations. so due tosome reasons, we are transfering stock from one storage location to another storage location. so in this context can anybody say what are the followings:
1. posting date
2. document date
3. entry date
waiting for proper response.
manas

Hi Manas,
The Document Date is the date in which the business transaction for the Documente(e.g., a transfer of posting) took place. The document date is the date on which the original document was issued.
The document date can, for example, refer to the creation date of the delivery note issued by the vendor or the internal goods receipt slip.
The Posting Date determines the posting period and defines in which fiscal period a document will post (regardless of the Document or Entry date). It is the date which is used when entering the document in Financial Accounting or Controlling. The periods that are permitted for posting are determined by Accounting Services. This is the date that G/L Account Balances are updated.
The fiscal year and the period for which an update of the accounts specified in the document or cost elements is made, are derived from the posting date. The Posting Date will override the Fiscal Period entered on a document if they are different.
When entering documents, the system checks whether the posting date entered is allowed by means of the posting period permitted.
The posting date can differ from both the entry date (day of entry into the system) and the document date (day of creation of the original document).
The Entry Date is the date the transaction was actually "permanently entered" into R/3.
Note: It is possible that an invoice was issued with a Document Date of 6/15/98, entered into R/3 on 7/15/98 (Entry Date) with a Posting Date of 6/30/98 (to post the Document in the previous fiscal year). Many times, all three of these dates are the same.
Thanks,
Susmitha.
Mark helpful answers.

Entry Date Wrong in report RPLICO10 (Transacton Code:S_AHR_61016362)

Hi
I have a problem in the Report RPLICO10 Flexible Employee Data.
When the report executed we observed that the Entry Date is coming wrong. Instead of Date of Joining (supposed to get from Info Type 0000) the system taking the Start date (Date of Birth from Info Type 2) as entry date.
Recently our system got upgraded to ECC6
What could be the reason and how to solve the issue.
EKP Yadav

Hi
check in Tcode PAR2 in thau can get hire date
Edited by: Sr!^^ on Oct 31, 2008 5:50 AM

System check on duplication of miro

Hi expert
I want to system to give a check when a enduser trying to do miro for which, miro have been already posted.
Regard
Nabil

Hi Nabil
You can setup the check for duplicate invoice in vendor also LFB1-REPRF, in company code view--Payment Transactions.
Here is the F1 help on the field
Check Flag for Double Invoices or Credit Memos
Indicator which means that incoming invoices and credit memos are checked for double entries at the time of entry.
Use
Checking Logistics documents
Firstly, the system checks whether the invoice documents have already been entered in the Logistics invoice verification; the system checks invoices that are incorrect, or invoices that were entered for invoice verification in the background.
Checking FI documents
The system then checks whether there are FI or Accounting documents that were created with the original invoice verification or the Logistics verification, and where the relevant criteria are the same.
Checking Logistics documents
In checking for duplicate invoices, the system compares the following characteristics by default: Vendor Currency Company code Gross amount of the invoice Reference document number Invoice document date
If all of these characteristics are the same, the system issues a message that you can customize.
When you enter credit memos or subsequent adjustments, the system does not check for duplicate invoices.
Exception: Country-specific solution for Argentina, where invoices and credit memos are checked for duplicate documents.
No message is issued if you enter a document that has previously been reversed.
Dependencies
The system only checks for duplicate invoices in Materials Management if you enter the reference document number upon entering the invoice.
In Customizing for the Logistics invoice verification, you can specify that the following characteristics should not be checked: Reference document number Invoice document date Company code
This means that you can increase the likelihood that the system will find a duplicate invoice, because you can reduce the number of characteristics checked.
Example
The following document has already been entered and posted:
Reference document number: 333
Invoice date: 04/28/00
Gross invoice amount: 100.00
Currency: EUR
Vendor: Spencer
Company code: Munich
You have made the following settings in Customizing:
The field "Reference document number" and "Company code" are deselected, which means that these characteristics will not be checked.
Now you enter the following document:
Reference document number: 334
Invoice date: 04/28/00
Gross invoice amount: 100.00
Currency: EUR
Vendor: Spencer
Company code: Berlin
Result
Because you entered a reference document when you entered the invoice, the system checks for duplicate invoices.
The reference document number and the company code are different from the invoice entered earlier, but these characteristics are not checked due to the settings you have made in Customizing.
All other characteristics are the same. As a result, the system issues a message that a duplicate entry has been made.
If the "Reference document number" had been selected in Customizing, the system would have checked the document and discovered that it was different from the invoice entered earlier, so it would not have issued a message.
Checking FI documents
Depending on the entry in the field "Reference", one of the following checks is carried out: 1. If a reference number was specified in the sequential invoice/credit memo, the system checks whether an invoice/credit memo has been posted where all the following attributes agree: Company code Vendor Currency Document date Reference number 2. If no reference number was specified in the sequential invoice/credit memo, the system checks whether an invoice/credit memo has been posted where all the following attributes agree:Company code Vendor Currency Document date Amount in document currency
Hope this is what you were looking for.
Regards
Shailesh

Entry date not proper in adhoc query

Hi,
Entry date field in action infotype ( in the adhoc query) always returns 00.00.0000. Whereas the standard reports brings the entry date properly (This is from prelq.hiredate). How we can bring the values into this particular field.The feature 'ENTRY' returns DATYP but data is not maintained in IT41. System should bring the hiring action date (0000 start date) as the entry date. We want to use this entry date field in the adhoc query.
Thanks in advance.
Sreeja

Hi Sreeja
Please read the following paragraph of the consulting note 508026 :
"Exception:
If the query is started with a key date selection, the query calls
function module HR_LEAVING_DATE with the key date and not with the start
and end date of the personnel action in which the key date exists. You
can use modification note 562031 to change this system response."
Please also make sure, that the corrections of note 561514 are contained in your system.
I hope that this information be useful for you.
Regards,
Jun

SD Billing to FI Accounting: How to make Baseline Date equal to Entry Date?

Hello,
I have configured Baseline Date to be equal to Entry Date in the Payments Terms in OBB8. I have assigned this payment term to the Customer as well as the Sales Order.
But still, when I release a Billing Document to accounting through VFX3, the Baseline Date in the Accounting Document is taken as the Document Date/Posting Date.
What does the configuration in Payment Terms do?
How can I get the Baseline Date to equal the Entry Date?
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Cheers!
Bharath

Just copy from the standrad delivered 0001 to some Z001 and change the date to entry date.
For me it is working fine. Also try first individually using FB60 or FB70 to llok at the behaviuor of the system.
reward if useful
sarma

Entry date in blank for limited Contract Type

Hello,
I've set up the feature ENTRY with the value EINDT X for my molga, but when I run a hiring action and in infotype 16, in the field Contract Type I use a Limited contract Type, and when I run the report S_AHR_61016362 (Flexible Employee
Data) the Entry Date Column is in blank but it does not happen when I use Unlimited Contract Type.
Does anyone can help me?

Hi,
This feature provides entry date definition method to function module HR_ENTRY_DATE. In your case it reads following fields from IT0016:
1. EINDT "Initial Entry"
2. KONDT "Date of Entry into Group"
First of all check that you entered one of these fields for employees with temporary contract.
Cheers

Schedule Line Date Showing in future in Sales Order though the Stock is available in system on same date

Hello All,
Good Morning,
We have received an Incident where in the Sales Order during the ATP Check we do user is getting the future schedule line date in future as enclosed in the screen shot below. User has created the Sales Order on 12052014 for 7 line items. For the Line Item 7 the Stock is available in the system on same day but still after ATP Check the date is shown in future.
I wan to replicate the scenario in Quality to find the exact bug to fix the Issue but not able to replicate for same customer and material i am getting the current date as confirmed delivery date. please guide me if you can share some inputs so that i can go in right direct and fix the issue.
Please respond it is critical Issue.
Thanks,
Farhan.

Hello All Experts,
Many Thanks for all the Inputs you have given.
Finally we have replicated the Issue in Quality 2 Days Back and Indeed it was great Achievement.
Finally We have given to Abaper to debug it find the root cause.
Let me summarise the actual Issue.
Issue : Sales Order Schedule Line showing future date for the Materials which are having Product Allocation even though the Stock is available and Allocation Qty also available in the PA Master Data we maintained..
We created one Sales Order for Line Item A and B. Line Item A is having Product Allocation. When we created Sales Order for both Line Item A and B we got Schedule Line Date as 13.06.2014. Then we Schedule the Re-Scheduling Job in V_V2 and check the effect. For Line Item A the Schedule Line Date got changed to 01.07.2014 and Line Item B it was same as before.
Would like to know is there any config setting at Schedule Line Level we have missed just want to cross check if there is any or something in Product Allocation Configuration.
Please refer screen shots below for more details of Sales Order before and after effect in Re-Scheduling.
Please provide your inputs on this.
Thanks,
Farhan.

The user name or password is incorrect in the CRM system checks during installation

Hi everyone
I'm installing CRM 2013 on 2 servers (server 2012) - CRM Full server + SQL Server 2012.
I created 2 service accounts for this - CRMSVC + CRMSANDBOX (one for sandbox and another one for all the rest).
I'm getting the following error in the system checks during setup:
I've verified a billion times that the service accounts and passwords are valid - I even tried using different service accounts - same problem. As for now I also added the service accounts to the local admins groups just to be sure that it's not some permissions
issue (I also added them to the 'log on as service' & performance logs groups).
If i try to use NETWORK SERVICES instead of a service account - the installation goes through flawlessly - no issues at all.
I'm also gonna say that i tried another installation on a fresh server - SAME ISSUE.
So for now my ideas are either it's a GPO somehow blocking the service accounts - or some kind of other security issue.
I also found out that the security event log shows these two errors when these show up in the system checks:
Inside i found 'NULL SID' entry - it does not recognize the service accounts account and 0xC0000064 in the Sub
Status Codes
It's not a typo issue so don't bother - if i write a wrong password in purpose - it actually says that the password i typed for domain\service account is incorrect - here it seems that the service account is not being recognized.
Any ideas anyone?
Thanks
Please vote if you find my post helpful - Thanks

Not sure you understood my point.
The installation process necessarily runs under the account of the installing user. The installation will query AD to identify information about the service accounts, and will add them to the relevant CRM AD groups. It is possible that the installing user
account does not have sufficient privileges on the AD objects for the service accounts to be able to identify them, and to add them to groups. This scenario is consistent with the errors that you get, and also with being able to install CRM to run under NetworkServices
(which doesn't have its own AD object)
Microsoft CRM MVP - http://mscrmuk.blogspot.com/ http://www.excitation.co.uk
Hi David
I understand this, but as far as i know running it under NETWORK SERVICES will add the machine names to the OU security groups - hence the user installing still needs to have delegated permissions on that OU. Anyway as mentioned above - ignoring the checks
and running the installation solved this and also added the accounts to the security groups - so this whole mess looks like some bug to me - not sure i will ever find out what it was :)
Please vote if you find my post helpful - Thanks

KE27 msg k/846 system checks entry date

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for