Keyword search

Hi,
I would like to be able to do the following search using keywords:
Name1 Name2 Name3 - with just these names showing up.
With Contain, I get everything...... I do not want everything that has Name3 and other keywords in it, just Name1 Name2 Name3,
With Contain All, I get just the ones that have Name1 Name2 Name3 and not with just Name1 or Name2 or Name3.
With Contain Words, I get the same results as with Contain All.
So, what I would like is to have Just Name1 Name2 Name3 and not pictures that have one of those names.
Example if I want:  Jim, Thomas, Smith.  I do not want that filter to return Betty, Sue, Smith, just because it has Smith.
or return with Jim, Rod, Jones, just because it has Jim.
But if a picture(s) has Jim, Thomas, Smith, with Jim, Thomas Smith, Betty.  that would be okay, as it would have my three keywords with Betty.
Help.

OK, I think I understand.  The text matching of LR can be quite confusing, in my opinion -- I always have to refer back to the manual.  Here's what the "contains" operators do:
Contains Tiffany Katchmar Snell -- will match any picture that has at least one of strings "Tiffany", "Katchmar", or "Snell" anywhere in its keywords.  For example, it will match a picture that has just one keyword "Osnelling".  The picture may have additional keywords, and it will still match.
Contains All Tiffany Katchmar Snell -- will match any picture that has all of the strings "Tiffany", "Katchmar", and "Snell" anywhere in its keywords.  For example, it will match a picture that includes the three keywords "Tiffany", "Katchmar", "Osnelling"; but it won't match a picture that has just "Tiffany" and "Katchmar".  The picture may have additional keywords, and it will still match.
Contains Words Tiffany Katchmar Snell -- will match any picture whose keywords that has all the words "Tiffany", "Katchmar", and "Snell" (a word is a string of characters separated by spaces or other punctuation).  For example, it will match a picture that includes "Tiffany", "Katchmar", and "Snell", but it won't match if the picture includes 'Tiffany", "Katchmar", and "Osnelling", and it won't match a picture with just the keywords "Tiffany" and "Katchmar".
So getting back to your task:
I want all pictures of Tiffany by herself or others.  You may ask why then do I use Tiffany Katchmar Snell?  Well, I have not been very good at keywording with Tiffany in every picture of her.  I have used her maiden and married name at time without her name
So it sounds like some of your pics of the person are labeled with just "Tiffany", some with "Tiffany Katchmar" and some with "Tiffany Snell", and you'd like to find all of them?
If that's correct, then using "Contains Words Tiffany" will get all of your pics.  But if you have other Tiffany's, e.g. "Tiffany Smith", then you'd pick them up as well.   If you want just the particular Tiffany, then you'll need to rekeyword the pics labeled with "Tiffany" with either "Tiffany Katchmar" or "Tiffany Snell".  Then you could use a Smart Collection defined as:

Similar Messages

  • In Adobe Bridge, how can I display keywords in their hierarchy, do an "aka" keyword assignment, and perform multi-value keyword searches?

    Hi Bridge Geniuses!
    I need your help. I am using Bridge to sort and keyword a pretty big photo archive. I have created a pretty long nested hierarchy (4 layers deep, max) and, for a few reasons, would like the parent tags to be automatically included when I indicate a sub-tag.  The problem I have now is that the keyword list is distractingly long and organized alphabetically. My first question is this: is there a preference setting in Bridge that will ask the program to display the keywords in their hierarchy? That is, will Bridge present the list as, for example, cars à hybrids à Toyotas à Prius. 
    My second question is: if I have two or more names that represent the same keyword, is there an “aka” function in this program that will allow me to direct searches for two or more different words to the same keyword entry? (For example, if I want my searches for “Bruce Wayne” to also show entries marked as “Batman.”)
    Finally, I would like to know if Bridge will perform keyword searches for more than one word at a time. So far, I have tried entering two keywords with overlap at a time, separated by a space or a comma or a semicolon, and the search comes up empty.
    Thank you very much for your help!

    I reset my custom workspace and all seems to be well now. My keywords now show, the number of photos each applies to and I can again search.
    Thank you.

  • I can't find sweetim, but everytime I log out of Firefox and back on, it shows up as the default keyword search. How can I fix this!!!!!

    I have checked my installed programs, the list of add ons on internet explorer and the one on Firfox, and cannot find sweetim. However, when I try to do a keyword search in the location bar, I am only able to do it twice, until I switch to a new tab. After that, the keyword search no longer works, and gives me a message saying that I haven't typed in the URL correctly or it doesn't exist. There seems to be some connection to www.amazon.com, because everytime I open a new tab and try to do a keyword search in the location bar, amazon.com moves to the top of the small search window, and google moves down. I cannot search in the small window when amazon.com is up, because it won't let me overwrite.
    When I check the about:config, and reset to the defaults after 2 keyword test searches, it sets back to the sweetim.toolbar as the default again. I was just resetting Firefox, but I think I've done that 8 or 9 times now, and I still have the problem.
    What should I do next to fix this?

    HI Noah:
    Thanks for your answer. I'm working my way through the blog, and trying to take all of the steps. Hitman Pro did find 5 trojans, and many remnants of other malware, so hopefully that will help. I'll post again when I've finished trying everything else.
    I had already run Malware Bytes, It did not find/remove the sweetim toolbar, but found a different trojan. Something is up with my antivirus I think.

  • Podcast not showing up in iTunes keyword search

    Hello, all -
    Podcast: Z.E.D.D. Radio
    I asked Apple support for help with this, but they basically wrote back and gave me this forum URL.  Yes, there are other posts on this "keyword" topic, but they seem to be from 2012, and they didn't quite give me the info I was looking for.  Would anyone be willing to help me out?  I'm still kinda new at this, even though I've successfully posted 42 episodes of my podcast on iTunes already.  I feel I might be losing a large number of potential subscribers because the only way to find my podcast is from the name of the podcast itself, not keywords, and not many people are aware of my podcast.
    Basically, I am using Google Feedburner with the Smartcast settings.  My show is hosted on Talkshoe.com.  A friend set up my podcast on iTunes for me last year, but I have total control of the Feedburner account.  I have only 7 keywords in Feedburner and the first one is "zombies."  The 2nd one "zombie."  I'm sure there are tons of zombie podcasts out there, but when I type "zombies" for a keyword search in iTunes, I'm shocked to see podcasts listed there that have nothing to do about the subject.  Worse, after a keyword search, I see shows listed that are not even running anymore.  It's like a podcast graveyard, but there is no sign of mine, which updates with a new episode every week.
    Am I not submitting keywords correctly in my feed?  Is it based on popularity and number of reviews in iTunes?  I understand if my show can't compete with the big boys, but to have a podcast show up that has nothing to do with zombies while mine stays invisible (even though it's specifically about my keyword search), really baffles me.
    Anyone willing to give me some insight with this?  Any help would be appreciated.  Just tell me what info or details you need.  Thanks!

    Thanks, Roger -
    It seems to pull up every podcast with the word "zombie" in the title, and then displays some random podcasts that may or may not have anything to do with zombies.  I just figured that "zombie" is my one (and now only) keyword, I'd be in there somewhere.  Since I was not the one who initially submitted the podcast to iTunes, I have no idea what information was requested and entered at the time...or if that's even relevant.  What I do have control over is my source webhosting site (Talkshoe) and the Google Feedburner site, which I'm told is the only thing that matters, unless there was a keyword entry field specific to iTunes during the initial set-up I do not have access to.
    It seems like I can enter keywords at Talkshoe (hosting site), and I can enter keywords on my Feedburner (RSS Feed).  I've read online that if the source has keywords, the feed keywords will be ignored.  They both have the same keywords, so I doubt that's the issue, but I've erased the source keywords and left the Feedburner ones.  I'll see if that changes anything when I upload my latest podcast.
    Does iTunes ask for keywords during the initial iTunes application process that overrides everything?  If so, that my be my problem.  I have no idea what the guy who set up my podcast in iTunes wrote?  Is that part of the iTunes application process?
    Thanks again! 

  • CS3 Bridge keyword search failure

    To the best of my knowledge this particular issue has not been covered in the dozens of prior posts about keywords.  I apologize if I've missed it.
    My photos, by the nature of their creation and paperwork generation, are organized by overall dividers, year, month, partial alphabetic breakdown, and customer name, respectively.  I have a need to be able to find photos across all folders throughout the hierarchy that are of the same person.  I've been using keywords of the individuals' names to accomplish this and it has been tremendously effective.
    In 2009, it became necessary to move all images archived in 2008 to another location on the server.  As one might expect, the keywords didn't jive with the index (my reasoning, anyway) and search functionality was ineffective.  Not long thereafter, the functionality came back - most likely by way of a non-indexed keyword search.
    The same issue has occured this year in that all the images shot in 2009 had to be moved.  I have changed the manner in which the structure is built to prevent this from being necessary again in the future, but the keyword search is now not functioning again.  However, this time I am unable to re-establish it.  I have tried multiple non-indexed (with subdirectory) keyword searches both across the entire server and in smaller folder breakdowns.  I have cleared the cache and searched again.  Even if I open a folder with brand new files and verify keyword presence and accuracy, a search inside that specific folder will not return a result.
    The question is: What have I done / missed?
    Even if it had nothing to do with moving the 2009 files, I may have done something to knock something askew that's impeding my search abilities.  I don't use Bridge for very complex tasks, so I might need some extra help, but I'm keenly interested in your ideas and expertise.  Assistance in any form will be appreciated.

    Im geting the same... I tried refreshing cache etc... but no avail...

  • LR keyword search (coming from PSE Organizer 9)

    I am using LR 4.1 RC2.  This morning using LR I upgraded my PSE Organizer 9 catalog.  It has about 50k photos with keywords and star ratings.  It seems like the upgrade worked because I can now see all my photos in LR and they have the keywords and star ratings.  Hurray!  I am having some trouble  figuring out how to do keyword searches in LR though so I hope someone can help.
    In Organizer there are several ways to do keyword searchs:
    1.  Use the Keyword Tags panel and click on one or multiple keywords.  Organizer will then display only the photos that have all of the keywords, i.e., it uses AND.  This is very easy and is great for finding things very quickly when using one or more keywords.
    2.  Use Find > By Details (Metadata) which allows searching by multiple keywords and the choice of AND or OR.  You can also combine the keyword search with other metadata so that, for example, you can find all Bird photos taken in Florida using a Canon 7D + 100-400mm at ISO 400 in April 2011 that have 3 or more stars.  I use this option to search fairly often.
    3.  Use the Search bar and type in search expressions using NOT, AND, and OR.  I occasionally use this for complicated searches that #2 can't handle.  This is a pain in the butt to use since you must type everything out, but when #1 or #2 can't do it (which is rare) it is great to have this option too.
    Several months ago I read on the PSE forum a thread about using Organizer and an Adobe developer recommended upgrading to LR since it was more flexible and meant for professionals and serious amateurs.  Therefore even though I have read the LR help info and can't find how to do sophisticated searches I am sure it is possible and I just haven't found it yet.  Here is what I have found so far:
    1.  Use the Keyword List panel where I can select only one keyword.
    2.  Use the Library Filter bar where I can do a ctrl-click on multiple keywords, but this results in an OR instead of AND.  In other words, if I click on Birds and then ctrl-click on Florida I get all bird photos and all Florida photos (the union, not the intersection).  This is probably almost never what a person wants.
    I hope someone can tell me or point me to documentation so that I can at least do as much as the amateur Organizer can do.  Thank you!

    John, thanks for the reply.  Yes, I am discovering that the amateur Organizer has much better searching capability than the professional Lightroom. I have already mentioned in my post the flexibility and power and Organizer is not even as good as some other programs.  I had spent time investigating LR, but mostly raw conversion and non-destructive editing.  I had, I think naturally, assumed that LR's database functions would be at least as good as the cheap Organizer.  I never dreamt that they would not be as good or as easy to use.  I sometimes wonder what happens in corporations when they seem to forget their own past and come out with new stuff that is a step or two backwards compared to their older, lower end stuff.  Oh well.
    Thank you very much for the tip about having more than one instance of keywords in the filter bar.  That helps.
    After I posted I discovered using Smart Collections and that helps a bit too.  It is sort of a cutdown, less user friendly version of the Find By Details (Metadata) function in Organizer.  It also means that for just a one time search I would have to create a smart collection and then delete it.  What's with that, I wonder?  Of course, if you often want to do that same search then it is good (Organizer allows you to save the search too), but most of the time I just do it one time.  Oh well.
    I looked at the Any Tag plugin and also the Any Filter plugin (same website) and I might download them to try out.
    What I would like for Adobe to do is have their LR developers (probably a more prestigious development team in the company) talk to their Organizer developers (maybe a less prestigious development team) so that the LR developers can learn a bit about this.  Yes, I have been a software developer for many years so I do understand a bit about development organizations.  LR and PS are standard bearing products so their teams probably are held in higher esteem.  Time to be humble and talk to other people though, IMO.
    If any LR developers happen to read this then please know that I mean no offense.  But, please, at least, take a look at Organizer and see if you can come up with something simpler that requires less typing of multiple long keywords and more powerful searching using various types of metadata.  I am not saying Organizer is the best out there, but it is much better than LR in this case.

  • Couldnt work with multiple key fields in keyword search

    Hi,
    I have some issue while working keyword search uder free form search in datamanager. in my repository i have two keyfields name(default field) and nation(lookup flat). but while working with keyword search if i pass any value that is comparing with only the values under keyfield name not comparing with other keyfield nation values. i am working with MDM 5.5 sp6. It would be appreciable if any one solve this issue.
    Regards
    Ravi

    Hi Ravi,
    If you want to perform Keyword search for Nation field as well without changing it's field type; then plz follow these steps:
    1. Set the Keyword property for Nation Field as Normal in Main table.
    2. Now go to the lookup table to which Nation field is looking into (say the Lookup table name is Nations).
    3. Now set the Keyword property for Nation field as Normal in the lookup table (Nations table) as well.
    4. Go back to Main table and now perform Keyword search. This time it will perform the search on both the fields (i.e., Name as well as Nation).
    Please let us know, if problem still persists.
    Regards,
    Varun

  • Oracle iRecruitment: Keyword Search within Resumes using Oracle Text

    Dear All,
    As per my understanding (and Note: 247064.1) simple Keyword searches can be performed in iRecruitment if oracle Text is installed. However searching for Keywords within resumes is not possible using Oracle Text and is possible ONLY if Resume Parsing is enabled via a third party (non-oracle) service provider.
    Can you please let me know if my understanding is correct and if not provide further inputs on this.
    Thanks,
    Subrat

    Got this confirmation from Oracle via SR:
    Resume searching is independent of resume parsing and not required to search resumes.
    Oracle Text is the text engine that allows you to search documents using content-based queries. Oracle Text allows you to upload documents, search documents, parse resumes, etc.
    Hence to conclude - Installation of Oracle Text will allow Keyword Searches on resumes.
    Thanks,
    Subrat

  • HOW TO CREATE A KEYWORD SEARCH FORM

    Hi, I'm creating a image gallery and I'm about 90% complete. One of my  final objectives is to create a keyword search for my image gallery. I  have 4 fields in my DB, (id,image,description,keywords) I want to be  able to enter keywords into the text field  and the images with there  descriptions show up. I already have the  keywords in my mysql, I already know how to use mysql, I just need to learn how to add a search form that pulls keywords from my mysql. THIS DOES NOT REQUIRE ANY CODE so please do not respond with code. I just need a step by step on what type of form to insert, (dynamic text field or text field) what paramaters to pass etc. NO CODE, this whole thing can be done in design veiw.
    For this project I'm using Dreamweaver Cs5, I'm not really an  experienced coder I rely heavily on dreamweaver for my code, I just make  minor tweaks. So if anyone has an answer to my problem please break  down and simplify your answer I'm still a beginner. Thanks in advance.
    ps
    If anyone knows of any other video tutorials of this process please inform me, it would be greatly appreciated, thank you.(not php acedemies)

    This is helpfull but I'm still running in to some problems. I believe everything on my search page is correct, I think it's my results page thats giving me issues.  When I view my search page in firefox and type in a keyword in the text field, when the results page loads all I get is the field names of DB table (id,layouts,desription,key_words) instead of the actual data...??
    On my search page in the action box I have my results page "search_results.php". In the method box I have "GET".  On my "search_ruselts.php" page I created a recordset, selected all columns, and filtered "key_words". (im not sure if I filtered correctly) I placed this in a dynamic table. Where did I go wrong?
    this is my code if it helps any
    search page:
    <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
    <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
    <title>Untitled Document</title>
    </head>
    <body>
    <form id="form1" name="form1" method="get" action="search_results.php">
      <label for="textfield"></label>
      <input type="text" name="textfield" id="textfield" />
      <input type="submit" name="button" id="button" value="Submit" />
    </form>
    </body>
    </html>
    results page:
    <?php require_once('Connections/test_db.php'); ?>
    <?php
    if (!function_exists("GetSQLValueString")) {
    function GetSQLValueString($theValue, $theType, $theDefinedValue = "", $theNotDefinedValue = "")
      if (PHP_VERSION < 6) {
        $theValue = get_magic_quotes_gpc() ? stripslashes($theValue) : $theValue;
      $theValue = function_exists("mysql_real_escape_string") ? mysql_real_escape_string($theValue) : mysql_escape_string($theValue);
      switch ($theType) {
        case "text":
          $theValue = ($theValue != "") ? "'" . $theValue . "'" : "NULL";
          break;   
        case "long":
        case "int":
          $theValue = ($theValue != "") ? intval($theValue) : "NULL";
          break;
        case "double":
          $theValue = ($theValue != "") ? doubleval($theValue) : "NULL";
          break;
        case "date":
          $theValue = ($theValue != "") ? "'" . $theValue . "'" : "NULL";
          break;
        case "defined":
          $theValue = ($theValue != "") ? $theDefinedValue : $theNotDefinedValue;
          break;
      return $theValue;
    $maxRows_Recordset1 = 10;
    $pageNum_Recordset1 = 0;
    if (isset($_GET['pageNum_Recordset1'])) {
      $pageNum_Recordset1 = $_GET['pageNum_Recordset1'];
    $startRow_Recordset1 = $pageNum_Recordset1 * $maxRows_Recordset1;
    $colname_Recordset1 = "-1";
    if (isset($_GET['key_words'])) {
      $colname_Recordset1 = $_GET['key_words'];
    mysql_select_db($database_test_db, $test_db);
    $query_Recordset1 = sprintf("SELECT * FROM images2 WHERE key_words = %s ORDER BY id DESC", GetSQLValueString($colname_Recordset1, "text"));
    $query_limit_Recordset1 = sprintf("%s LIMIT %d, %d", $query_Recordset1, $startRow_Recordset1, $maxRows_Recordset1);
    $Recordset1 = mysql_query($query_limit_Recordset1, $test_db) or die(mysql_error());
    $row_Recordset1 = mysql_fetch_assoc($Recordset1);
    if (isset($_GET['totalRows_Recordset1'])) {
      $totalRows_Recordset1 = $_GET['totalRows_Recordset1'];
    } else {
      $all_Recordset1 = mysql_query($query_Recordset1);
      $totalRows_Recordset1 = mysql_num_rows($all_Recordset1);
    $totalPages_Recordset1 = ceil($totalRows_Recordset1/$maxRows_Recordset1)-1;
    $colname_Recordset2 = "-1";
    if (isset($_GET['id'])) {
      $colname_Recordset2 = $_GET['id'];
    mysql_select_db($database_test_db, $test_db);
    $query_Recordset2 = sprintf("SELECT * FROM images2 WHERE id = %s ORDER BY id DESC", GetSQLValueString($colname_Recordset2, "int"));
    $Recordset2 = mysql_query($query_Recordset2, $test_db) or die(mysql_error());
    $row_Recordset2 = mysql_fetch_assoc($Recordset2);
    $totalRows_Recordset2 = mysql_num_rows($Recordset2);
    ?>
    <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd">
    <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
    <head>
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
    <title>Untitled Document</title>
    </head>
    <body>
    <table cellpadding="4" cellspacing="4">
      <tr>
        <td>id</td>
        <td>Layouts</td>
        <td>Descriptions</td>
        <td>key_words</td>
      </tr>
      <?php do { ?>
        <tr>
          <td><?php echo $row_Recordset1['id']; ?></td>
          <td><?php echo $row_Recordset1['Layouts']; ?></td>
          <td><?php echo $row_Recordset1['Descriptions']; ?></td>
          <td><?php echo $row_Recordset1['key_words']; ?></td>
        </tr>
        <?php } while ($row_Recordset1 = mysql_fetch_assoc($Recordset1)); ?>
    </table>
    </body>
    </html>
    <?php
    mysql_free_result($Recordset1);
    mysql_free_result($Recordset2);
    ?>

  • Keyword search not working properly in Mail since iCloud upgrade

    Since I upgraded to iCloud from MobileMe and Lion from Snow Leopard, the new Mail (Version 5.2 (1278)) does not execute keyword searches properly.  With the previous version I could start entering a keyword and all potential matches based on my criteria (email contents, from, to, subject etc.) would populate the window with all possible matches from whichever folders I specified or all folders. That is not happening now.  I have entered numerous keywords in the search box for matches I know exist, but they are not being found.
    Anyone also seeing this issue?  I am using Mail to access an IMAP email account for my business. Again, this was not a problem before the migration to iCloud and the forced Mail version upgrade.
    Richard

    Thank you. I can't find "startup volume" in the side bar. Is that my SSD (or hard disc) main boot drive you're taliking about? I hope this will work...
    If it doesn't work, you might try posting a new discussion to see if others might have some thoughts on it.
    Well, there's another post (here):
    http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=1293956
    from the looks of it, I'm in serious trouble as this is now becomming a common issue and one that has no resolve. This really messes everything up as I need (as well as a lot of others out there) to use the search on a daily basis for me to check on past emails. I rely on that to work. This is terrible... There is really no other way to search for anything now. What was Apple thinking?...
    Again, I look forward to your reply to my (above) question...

  • Keyword Search Not Functioning Correctly

    In firefox 3, Keyword search does exactly as explained in the link below. However, when I downloaded Firefox 4, keyword search does not work as it did in Firefox 3. When I type "Mozilla foundation" (or any improper URL) in firefox 4 and hit enter, it simply does a google search. I have tried everything to fix this issue. I tried resetting the "Keyword.enabled" setting with no success. When I disable keyword search, then Domain guessing steps in and does its job.
    Heres an example:
    In firefox 3, if I type "yah" into the navigation bar, it brings me straight to http://www.yahoo.com/. This is how I would expect keyword search to work.
    In Firefox 4, If I type "yah" into the navigation bar, it brings me to a google search of yah.

    I figured out what to do, and I am only posting a reply for people with similar problem.
    1. Go to "about:config"
    2. Search for Keyword.URL
    3. Double click it, and enter the following string value: http://www.google.com/search?ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&sourceid=navclient&gfns=1&q=
    4. Hit ok, restart firefox, and it works!
    Here's what happened. The guy above gave me links that told me how to modify the keyword.url setting. However, none of the links gave the value I needed to enter to make it work. So, I had an epiphany! I opened firefox 3, I copied the '''default''' value for keyword.url. Then I posted that value into firefox 4's keyword.url. It seems kind of silly that mozilla would change the default for that setting, but whatever. I then tried to figure out how I could import all of the Firefox 3 values into the firefox 4 values, but I quickly gave up haha.

  • IPhoto Keyword Search Not Functioning Correctly

    I'm finally getting around to organizing my 20,000+ photos in iPhoto. I am attaching keywords to the individual pictures and have noticed something very curious: When I go to iPhoto's search box and type in a keyword, often many pictures that are not tagged with that keyword are returned.
    For example, I can type in the keyword "sign" and pictures from my wedding are returned as though they contain this keyword. I've double-checked the picture filenames, descriptions, faces, keywords, and places, and nowhere do I see the word "sign" associated with these photos.  It happens with other keywords I enter into the search box, too.  Totally unrelated photos - sometimes lots of them - are returned, rendering the whole process relatively ineffective.
    Does anyone know why this is happening?
    TIA for any assistance. I'm frustrated, having spent all this time associating keywords to my photos, only to have the keyword search option not effectively work for me!

    I understand why the text search for sign brings up the Surround Sound Signs photos as it's just a text search. 
    Might be database corruption.  Try this: make a temporary, backup copy (select the library and type Command+D) and  apply the two fixes below in order as needed:
    Fix #1
    Launch iPhoto with the Command+Option keys held down and rebuild the library.
    Since only one option can be run at a time start with Option #1, followed by #3 and then #4 as needed.
    Fix #2
    Using iPhoto Library Manager  to Rebuild Your iPhoto Library
    Download iPhoto Library Manager and launch.
    Click on the Add Library button, navigate to your Home/Pictures folder and select your iPhoto Library folder.
    Now that the library is listed in the left hand pane of iPLM, click on your library and go to the File ➙ Rebuild Library menu option
    In the next  window name the new library and select the location you want it to be placed.
    Click on the Create button.
    Note: This creates a new library based on the LIbraryData.xml file in the library and will recover Events, Albums, keywords, titles and comments but not books, calendars or slideshows. The original library will be left untouched for further attempts at fixing the problem or in case the rebuilt library is not satisfactory.

  • In Keyword List panel, need to support quotes for AND'ing multi-word keyword searches

    As far as I know (and read around), there's no way to search multi-word keywords in the keywords list panel using the "Filter Keywords" box. i.e. If I want to search for the "Great Blue Heron" keyword in a large animal keywords list I have, Lightroom will OR the three words instead of AND'ing them like Aperture does more intuitively. Adding quotes like "Great Blue Heron" doesn't work either. Again this is to filter a large keyword lists through the "Filter Keywords" box in the Keywords List panel.
    Am I missing something? Is it possible to AND multi-word keywords?
    Thanks.

    Rob,
    as far as I know spaces are also contained and allowed in controlled vocabularies (e.g. for the "official" names of animals 'little panda' for example and plants). I'm using spaces for names very often. As a prof. photographer I need to write captions for all of my images before sending them to my agency with WHEN/WHAT/WHERE/WHO etc. So when shooting persons very often or regular (e.g. politicians or athletes) I started years ago to create keywords and hierarchies for them. So it is much easier and more comfortable to assign them later.
    Please check out PhotoMechanic or IMatch. These progs doesn't have any problems with spaces in keywords and keyword searches...
    BTW: when using a space in a search I expect that the default behaviour of such a space is a locical AND.
    Lars

  • Best Method For Keyword Search (Full Text Search)

    I have some cataloged columns I am searching for Keywords.
    This table is getting huge over 6.7 million records and it is
    becoming slow. What is the best method to optimize the DB for this
    Search.
    Do I need to create a column that
    will have a keyword associated to a description of each record
    or.... and search this particular column for the Records?. My
    clients records at time are store like "Bolt, Flange" and some are
    stored as "Bolt, Flange 1/4inch....." . Any one with any idea of
    the best methodology of getting this Keyword Search Optimized and
    returning faster query results?
    Thanks

    Consider creating a Verity collection on the appropriate
    columns in your database. The frequency of database update will
    help in determining if this is the appropriate thing to do.

  • Unicode issue for keyword SEARCH

    Hi All...
    In a report keyword SEARCH is used to find entry in internal table. basically this will find any value in internal table and will return sy-tabix as line number where the value exists.
    Syntax:     SEARCH itab FOR seek.
    where itab is internal table and seek is variable which can contain any value to be searched in itab.
    When i set 'Unicode check active' attribute in program attribute, while activating program i am getting error as: <b>Table "KEN3" must have a character line type (data type C, N, D, T, or STRING).</b>
    When i try to add additons In byte mode and in charecter mode, i am getting incompability errors.
    Is there any solution/alternative for this error. I am trying to make my program unicode compliant.     
    TIA,
    Agasti.

    Hi
    I think ur itab is having all the fields of the table
    Because of MANDT only it is generating the error declare ur itab below.
    I wrote the code like this and it is not generating any error
    Kindly have a look.
    data : begin of it_mara1,
           matnr like mara-matnr,
           meins like mara-meins,
           BLANZ like mara-BLANZ,
          end of it_mara1.
    search it_mara1 for 'new'." in character mode.
    Regards
    Shiva

  • Is there a way to clear keywords from a keyword search?

    Is there a way to clear keywords from a keyword search? I have hundreds of keywords and have to search thru them to make sure they are all unchecked. It takes forever. Is there a key combo for this?

    Found it. Hold down option and command and click on a new keyword and it unselects all the others (Same command as iCal)

Maybe you are looking for