Labview end of file encountered

After the crash I can't open the vi.
Automatic backup is on. But in LVAutoSave folder i found only old archives.
Is there any way to recover corrupted file or find a backup. LabView suppose to backup VIs every 5 minutes.
Thanks,
Nick
Attachments:
OA_Main.vi ‏172 KB

Well that was a bit confusing to read, but my guess is the file pointer is remaining at the end of the file if some sort of file close is not happening correctly when B is run inside A. You said when it is not shut down properly this happens, so all bets are off if the file isn't being closed. My suggestion is make sure the file is being closed properly (make sure you aren't aborting the VI, but instead are sending it a exit message), and if you do not use read from measurement file but instead use the file I/O VIs, there is a VI to set file position. You can set it to "start" every time before you read.
This is just a guess, you may want to post your VI if you can.
CLA, LabVIEW Versions 2010-2013

Similar Messages

LabVIEW: End of file encountered. While saving a freshly opened 8.6.1 vi

I recieved an error today while trying to migrate a LV 8.6.1 program into LV2009. The program opens sucessfully, and shows in the title bar with an asterisk showing that there has been changes. If I attempt to save the VI, the system hangs for a moment then gives the errors that I have attached below. These errors do not occur in LV 8.6.1.
I cannot post the entire VI for analysis, but I believe I have found the culprit. Attached, I also have a small demo VI that merely has 4 strip waveform charts. The VI was created in LV version 8.6, and on every LV2009 computer I have available it will crash when trying to save. The computer I have been using is a 3.2 Dual-core with 4GB of RAM, running windows XP SP3.
I realize the VI is quite large, and i'm not sure why that is. These waveform charts were copied from my application VI, then I cleared the data on them and reset the history to 10 samples.
I'm eager to know if this can be reproduced, and if there is something I would be able to do for a workaround. Thanks.
Attachments:
crashtest.zip ‏2374 KB

SigRob wrote:
That file is the 8.6 version, since i would have had to delete the graphs in order to save it in LV2009
Of course. You're right. I was thinking LV2009 because that was what I opened it with to see the 77 MB of objects and to see the crash. So I was think that was the "after" problem file, and I want to see the "before" file for comparison.
Of course the "before" is opening that file in LV 8.6 and seeing its properties, which I didn't do earlier. Interestingly enough, I get the same sort of memory numbers. 77.7 MB of data. And I was able to save it with LV 8.6. It took a long time, but it worked.
So there are really two questions here.
1. Why does a VI with very little in it take up 77 MB worth of data in memory? What is it and how do you clear it out?
2. Why is LV 8.6 able to save that file, but LV 2009 cannot?
When I delete all but the first graph, I get 3 MB on file and 15 MB of data in memory. Pretty much 1/5 of the original in both cases. But LV 2009 was able to save that.

Read waveform from file error: end of file

Hi,
I want to to save waveforms from DAQ and then, after the acquisition is stopped, I want to see again that waveforms to analyse my data.
I tried to do a simple VI in which simulated signals can be saved to a file and can be read drom that file too. This is possible by using a Save Button and a Read Button. The problem is that when the Save Button is OFF and the Read Button is ON the error "End of file" occours, even if I know that there are more data that can be read from the file.
I read from
http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/End-Of-File-Error/m-p/387817#M193812
that this could be solved by choosing the option "Reload for each call" for the Read block, but it doesn't seem to work.
Does anyone have an idea to solve that?
Thanks
Attachments:
waveform write and read.vi ‏71 KB

First, a suggestion -- since your file name is the same every time, put a single instance of it outside your While loop and bring it into the loop as a "tunnel", using the same wire for all your Case statements.
I don't understand the logic of your construction. You have a While loop that never stops. As long as "Write" is true, it writes to a (new originally?) file, presumably appending at the end, closing the file after the write. If Read is true, it tries to read the i-th Waveform. What if there are less than i writes?
Why not simplify things. Remove the While loop, remove the Case Statements and Read/Write buttons, and simply do one Simulate Signal, one Write, and one Read (not wiring anything into the Read's Record selector). Does that work? If so, then think about how you might extend this to handle multiple reads and writes. Is there ever a situation when you envision doing Reads while you are also doing Writes? Isn't it more likely that, at any instance, you are going to be doing only Writes (for example, while generating data) or only Reads (while analyzing the saved data)? [I'm not saying that you might want to do both simultaneously, but if you don't have to, don't complicate things for yourself].
Bob Schor

NT 4.0, LabVIEW 6, Error 4 (END OF FILE) when trying to seek to byte offset 4096 (from start of file) when the file is larger than 2 Gig

If I try to seek (or read) with the position mode wired and set for START, I get error 4 (END OF FILE) if the file is larger than 2 GB. I'm only trying to move the file pointer 4096 bytes, not trying to seek or read more than 2GB, but I get the error if the file is over 2Gig.
Instead, I have to do reads, with the position mode unwired, until I get to the place in the file that I want to be.
Is this expected behavior?

Hello,
LabVIEW File I/O functions use an I32 value to store the size of a file. This means that we are limited to ~2GB file sizes when using the File I/O functions in LabVIEW. This explains why you are seeing odd behavior when trying to read to the end of the file, since this is causing the byte count to exceed ~2GB.
I hope this explanation sheds some light on the situation for you. Hopefully the workaround (repeated reads) is not too much of an inconvenience.
Good luck with your application, and have a pleasant day.
Sincerely,
Darren Nattinger
Applications Engineer
National Instruments
Darren Nattinger, CLA
LabVIEW Artisan and Nugget Penman

How does labview detect end of file?

Hello!
My question is how labview detects the end of file at the Read from Spreadsheet File VI. What I would like to do is basically to read from a text file a number of numeric values and afterwards build an array containing these values. Till now I have made a vi that uses the aforementioned vi and put it in a while loop that its conditional terminal is connected to the EOF? but it never stops. Could you please suggest a solution to my problem? (I have already seen a similar question in this forum but the answers didn't help me..) The VI along with an example file to read are attached.
Thank you very much
Attachments:
readfromfile.vi ‏9 KB
Book1.txt ‏1 KB

Please take off the while loop. and directly connect the indicator to the all rows output of the VI.
That will give you a 2D array of whatever is there in the spreadsheet.
Hope this helps.

Reading a copy 'end-of-file' marker using TEXT_IO

Hi
I am using TEXT_IO to read a file, but the in the file there are special characters such as
,' ' which I think are "end of file marker" 1A hex, which 'COPY' adds to the end of and ascii copy.
I'm using Oracle forms 6i, and when reading the above characters it raises unhandled exception ORA-01403, even though it hasn't reached the end of file.
Can anyone help or advaise a way to avoid this problem?
Thank You & Regards
Begum

One method is to save your data using the "write to spreadsheet file" vi, using whatever delimiter you choose (usually either comma ro tab char). This gives a file that can be opened with a text editor or Excel, and consists of rows of "numbers" seperated by the delimiter with an end of line char at the end of each row. When read back in using the "Read from Spreadsheet file", you can define how the values will be interpreted, either as numbers or as characters. The read data will be returned as a 2D array. This array can be indexed, either by autoindexing with loops, or by explicitly indexing to retrieve specific values (A[2,7]) and the returned values used however you wish.
P.M.
Putnam
Certified LabVIEW Developer
Senior Test Engineer
Currently using LV 6.1-LabVIEW 2012, RT8.5
LabVIEW Champion

"End of File" error 4 when trying to use Advanced TDMS Palette to create a circular file buffer

I'm using the Advanced TDMS palette to create an on-disk circular buffer. I was able to successfully implement the buffer for a single channel of data.
However, when I try to write multiple channels of data, I continuously get "End of File Encountered" error 4. I am pre-allocating 60,000 data points for each channel using the "TDMS Set Channel Information" function.
I am able to (1) Set Next Write Position and (2) perform an Asynchronous Write to the first channel. But when I try to Set Next Write Position to the second channel, I immediately get an error 4.
The examples have not been helpful as none of them write to different channels in sequence.
Attached is an example project of what I'm trying to do, coded in 2013SP1.
Sorry about the file hierarchy, the project is located in the ZIP file here:
Workspaces\V12000\_V12000 Common Labview Code\Named WF Array\Named WF Array.lvproj
http://linkd.in/mikele
Attachments:
Named WF Array Project.zip ‏1500 KB

I looked into your project and found that the error comes from Set Next Write Position because the "offset" passed in is out of range. In fact, for continueous logging, you don't need to put the Set Next Write Position in front of the write. Remove this function and you will find your VI can run successfully without throwing out any errors.

End of file error using modified version Cont Pattern Input.

Hi. I am using the Cont Pattern Input example, which is modified to write the Data Read to a file on the hard drive. A wire is connected from the Data Read to a "Write to I16 subVI" which is also modified to be a "Write to U8 subVI". It writes problem free to the file specified until the 2.1 GB when it displays a Error 4 "End of File Error". There is ample space on the hard drive. How do we get rid of this error as we would eventually need to write up to 60 GB of data?

Unfortunately, the only thing to do is get a different operating system. I seem to recall that Windows has a fixed limit on file size of about 2G.
Is there any way you can logically break the data you're collecting into smaller logical units? Alternately, you could structure your code to write to one file till it fills and automatically switch to a second, and a third and so on. As long as the routine that you write for working with these huge datasets keeps track of the various pieces of data it could all work as though it were all in one very very very large file.
Mike...
Certified Professional Instructor
Certified LabVIEW Architect
LabVIEW Champion
"... after all, He's not a tame lion..."
Be thinking ahead and mark your dance card for NI Week 2015 now: TS 6139 - Object Oriented First Steps

Adobe CS2 unexpected end-of-file was encountered

We have imaqge preview saving turned of but are still getting unexpected end-of-file was encountered errors when saving eps files. Saving the eps file to an new folder saves corerectly.

The reason for asking about the details has to do with a possible bug in XSan 1.2 which seem to be hitting Helios / Xinet and possibly also Apple's own AFP implementation.
Symptoms seem to be coherent (although 3 different products are used.
Here is post from the xsan-users mailing list
Otto,
There appear to be some semi-known issues that have come up when using Xinet's FullPress with Xsan as well. Files disappearing, becoming corrupt, reverting to earlier versions... Finder windows showing multiple versions of the same file, even though the shell only shows one... etc, etc, etc.
I can't tell you a whole lot about it as of yet, but the problem seems to be related to issues with files' i-node numbers. If you do a "ls -il" on the directory which contains your "missing" files and folders, often they will reappear. ??? Additionally you may notice that the i-node numbers change (they are the first numbers in the resulting list) with every execution of the "ls -il" command.
I was told by someone that it is some sort of "caching problem", although I don't know what that means exactly or how that would affect what we are seeing happen. Early indications seem to look like problems are more likely to occur when users are accessing the same files over again, at different times throughout the day, from different machines (ie. X user worked on X job in the AM on X Mac, and in the afternoon Y user worked on X job in the PM on Y Mac).
I wish I could tell you more, but I'm still in the early stages of tracking this one down!
Good luck,
Dustin Tantum
And here is a tech note from helios:
HELIOS TechInfo #095en01
========================
Tue, 24 Jan 2006
Data corruption using Apple XSan 1.2
Recently we received feedback from HELIOS partners and customers that
clients connected to HELIOS servers using Apple XSan 1.2 file systems
showed indications of intermittent data corruption.
Symptoms are that files can not be opened after Save, or show partial
old content. Among the affected applications are Adobe Photoshop,
InDesign, and Quark XPress.
Another symptom are system messages from the "desksrv" process, like
"node does not belong to index" which indicate corrupted database
contents.
From a "ktrace" dump of a "pcshare" process a partner could provide,
it became clear that contents of a data file were written correctly by
HELIOS. But after the application from the same SMB client did close,
reopen and then read the content in again, this was in part the old
content of the file.
As these problems may not be recognized by users every time they
occur, it would be safest not to use XSan 1.2 as a file system.
HELIOS has reported this to Apple who is currently investigating this
issue.
We recommend that every customer who encounters this Xsan data
corruption problem reports this bug to Apple.
When a workaround or fix is available, this information will be
distributed by a follow up to this TechInfo.
So XSan 1.2 and doing file sharing doesn't seem to cooperate well for now

Logical end-of-file reached during read operation

Hi,
Something strange happened to my Logic a couple of days ago - all of a sudden. When I start Logic up it gives me the following error message:
*Error reading/writing file “com.apple.logic.pro.cs”: Logical end-of-file reached during read operation.*
I have re-installed Logic, as well as updated it (8.0.2), I have repaired disk permissions in Disk Utility, and it still keeps popping up. I cannot get on with my projects and I have deadlines!
I found an IT support site, according to that I don't have enough space on my HD. However, I do... I'm confused, and desperately need help.
Thank you so much, I'm looking forward to hearing from somebody.
Agnes

I am not opening any files, just launching Logic.
I know. And when you launch Logic, it loads its preferences files - and it seems this is failing - most likely due to file corruption. So delete the file, as I said, and Logic should load fine.

Logical end of file error

I am getting a "logical end of file error =39" message when trying to export audio to SDII for making a time stamped (BWF) . Any ideas?

How long is the wedding video?
My standard list of things to do first...
Run MacJanitor (free download) to do all the Unix Cron Maintenance scripts.
Run Disk Utility (Applications -> Utilities) and repair disk permissions on your start up drive (typically your internal drive). Also verify any other drives mounted on the system.
Run Preferential Treatment (free download) to check for corrupt/damaged application and system preference files.
Run Cache Out X (free download) to clear all system and application caches.
Reboot your Mac.
If you still can not get it to run correctly, next thing to try is to throw out the iDVD preference file (don't forget to change back those preferences you want different from the defaults next time you run it). If it still doesn't work, then I would suggest you reinstall iDVD.
Patrick

Convrtd to Invterval Part- ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel

Hi all,
I had a table as Interval Partitioned. In order to create XML- Xpath indexes on it, I converted it to Range Partitioned table.
I am able to create the XPATH indexes but I get the error: ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel
- When I revert the code to Interval Partitioned without the XMLIndex, it works fine(although takes time as no XML Index)
- When I convert table to non partitioned table, create the XML Index, it works fine.
But I need the partitons, so when I create the partitioned table I get the error.
CREATE TABLE INT_PART_TABLE
DB_ID VARCHAR2(10 BYTE),
xML_mESSAGE SYS.XMLTYPE,
LOAD_TIMESTAMP TIMESTAMP(6)
XMLTYPE xML_mESSAGE STORE AS BINARY XML
PARTITION BY RANGE (LOAD_TIMESTAMP)
PARTITION MAX VALUES LESS THAN (TIMESTAMP' 2013-06-01 00:00:00')
TABLESPACE CSTR_STG_DATA
NOCOMPRESS
NOCACHE
ENABLE ROW MOVEMENT;
BEGIN
DBMS_XMLINDEX.dropparameter('Indx_Par');
END;
BEGIN
DBMS_XMLINDEX.REGISTERPARAMETER(
'Indx_Par',
'PATH TABLE Table1
PATHS (INCLUDE ( /abc:field1/xyz:field2
/abc:field1/def:field2
NAMESPACE MAPPING ( xmlns:abc="ABCD"
xmlns:def="DEFG"
xmlns:xyz="XYZA"
end;
create index INDX_XPATHS on "INT_PART_TABLE" (XML_MESSAGE) indextype is xdb.xmlindex
parameters ('PARAM Indx_Par') local;
Now if I execute the following statement in
SELECT T.xML_mESSAGE
FROM INT_PART_TABLE1 T
WHERE XMLEXISTS (
declare namespace abc="ABCD";
declare namespacedef="DEFG";
declare namespace xyz="XYZA";
let $tt as xs:boolean := fn:exists($p/main/id = ("144283","9085802")])
return if ($tt) then true()
else ()'
PASSING T.xML_mESSAGE AS "p");
- Is there any other way of writing this Select statement, which may work?
- Any other thing I need to take care of when defining the table and partitions script so that I don't get this error?

Hi,
I think it's time you give a clear (and working) test case so that we can safely try to reproduce the issue.
What you've given so far has syntax error and name mismatch.
So please :
- database version (SELECT * FROM v$version)
- complete sequence of DLLs
- some sample XML documents (it doesn't have to be the real ones, but at least something realistic)
Thanks in advance.
declare namespace abc="ABCD";
declare namespacedef="DEFG";
declare namespace xyz="XYZA";
let $tt as xs:boolean := fn:exists($p/main/id = ("144283","9085802")])
return if ($tt) then true()
else ()'Why all that stuff? You don't have to return a boolean.
The following works for me on 11.2.0.3 :
SQL> CREATE TABLE int_part_table (
2    db_id          VARCHAR2(10)
3 , xml_message    XMLTYPE
4 , load_timestamp TIMESTAMP
5 )
6 XMLTYPE xml_message STORE AS BINARY XML
7 PARTITION BY RANGE (load_timestamp) (
8    PARTITION MAX VALUES LESS THAN (timestamp '2013-06-01 00:00:00')
9 )
10 NOCOMPRESS
11 NOCACHE
12 ENABLE ROW MOVEMENT;
Table created
SQL> insert into int_part_table values (1, xmltype('<main><id>144283</id></main>'), sysdate);
1 row inserted
SQL> insert into int_part_table values (1, xmltype('<main><id>9085802</id></main>'), sysdate);
1 row inserted
SQL> insert into int_part_table values (1, xmltype('<main><id>1</id></main>'), sysdate);
1 row inserted
SQL> commit;
Commit complete
SQL> create index int_part_table_uix on int_part_table (xml_message)
2 indextype is xdb.xmlindex
3 parameters (
4 'PATH TABLE INT_PART_TABLE_PT
5 PATHS ( INCLUDE ( /main/id ) )')
6 local;
Index created
SQL> SELECT xml_message
2 FROM int_part_table
3 WHERE XMLExists(
4         '/main[id=("144283","9085802")]'
5         PASSING xml_message
6       )
7 ;
XML_MESSAGE
<main>
<id>144283</id>
</main>
<main>
<id>9085802</id>
</main>
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 3517234298
| Id | Operation                              | Name                         | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     | Pstart| Pstop |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                       |                              |     1 |   155 |    34   (6)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   1 | NESTED LOOPS                          |                              |     1 |   155 |    34   (6)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   2 |   VIEW                                 | VW_SQ_1                      |     1 |    25 |    32   (4)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   3 |    HASH UNIQUE                         |                              |     1 |    47 |         |             |       |       |
|* 4 |     HASH JOIN SEMI                     |                              |     1 |    47 |    32   (4)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   5 |      PARTITION SYSTEM SINGLE           |                              |     2 |    90 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
|* 6 |       TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| INT_PART_TABLE_PT            |     2 |    90 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
|* 7 |        INDEX SKIP SCAN                 | SYS117585_INT_PART__PIKEY_IX |     3 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
|   8 |      COLLECTION ITERATOR PICKLER FETCH | XQSEQUENCEFROMXMLTYPE        | 8168 | 16336 |    29   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|* 9 |   TABLE ACCESS BY USER ROWID           | INT_PART_TABLE               |     1 |   130 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 | ROWID | ROWID |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   4 - access("SYS_P3"."VALUE"=SYS_XQ_UPKXML2SQL(VALUE(KOKBF$),2,1,0) AND
              SUBSTRB("VALUE",1,1599)=SUBSTRB(SYS_XQ_UPKXML2SQL(VALUE(KOKBF$),2,1,0),1,1599))
   6 - filter(SYS_XMLI_LOC_ISNODE("SYS_P3"."LOCATOR")=1)
   7 - access("SYS_P3"."PATHID"=HEXTORAW('704E') )
       filter("SYS_P3"."PATHID"=HEXTORAW('704E') )
   9 - filter("ITEM_6"=TBL$OR$IDX$PART$NUM("DEV"."INT_PART_TABLE",0,7,65535,"INT_PART_TABLE".ROWID))
Note
   - Unoptimized XML construct detected (enable XMLOptimizationCheck for more information)
SQL> SELECT xml_message
2 FROM int_part_table
3 WHERE XMLExists(
4         '/main[id="144283" or id="9085802"]'
5         PASSING xml_message
6       )
7 ;
XML_MESSAGE
<main>
<id>144283</id>
</main>
<main>
<id>9085802</id>
</main>
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 3748936130
| Id | Operation                                | Name                         | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time     | Pstart| Pstop |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                         |                              |     1 |   155 |    11 (10)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   1 | NESTED LOOPS                            |                              |     1 |   155 |    11 (10)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   2 |   VIEW                                   | VW_SQ_1                      |     2 |    50 |     8   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   3 |    HASH UNIQUE                           |                              |     2 |   180 |         |             |       |       |
|   4 |     CONCATENATION                        |                              |       |       |         |             |       |       |
|   5 |      NESTED LOOPS                        |                              |       |       |         |             |       |       |
|   6 |       NESTED LOOPS                       |                              |     1 |    90 |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   7 |        PARTITION SYSTEM SINGLE           |                              |     1 |    45 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
|* 8 |         TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| INT_PART_TABLE_PT            |     1 |    45 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
|* 9 |          INDEX SKIP SCAN                 | SYS117585_INT_PART__PIKEY_IX |     3 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
| 10 |        PARTITION SYSTEM SINGLE           |                              |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
|* 11 |         INDEX RANGE SCAN                 | SYS117585_INT_PART__PIKEY_IX |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
|* 12 |       TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID | INT_PART_TABLE_PT            |     1 |    45 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
| 13 |      NESTED LOOPS                        |                              |       |       |         |             |       |       |
| 14 |       NESTED LOOPS                       |                              |     1 |    90 |     4   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
| 15 |        PARTITION SYSTEM SINGLE           |                              |     1 |    45 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
|* 16 |         TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID| INT_PART_TABLE_PT            |     1 |    45 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
|* 17 |          INDEX SKIP SCAN                 | SYS117585_INT_PART__PIKEY_IX |     3 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
| 18 |        PARTITION SYSTEM SINGLE           |                              |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
|* 19 |         INDEX RANGE SCAN                 | SYS117585_INT_PART__PIKEY_IX |     1 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
|* 20 |       TABLE ACCESS BY LOCAL INDEX ROWID | INT_PART_TABLE_PT            |     1 |    45 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
|* 21 |   TABLE ACCESS BY USER ROWID             | INT_PART_TABLE               |     1 |   130 |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 | ROWID | ROWID |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   8 - filter("SYS_P5"."VALUE"='9085802' AND SYS_XMLI_LOC_ISNODE("SYS_P5"."LOCATOR")=1 AND SUBSTRB("VALUE",1,1599)='9085802')
   9 - access("SYS_P5"."PATHID"=HEXTORAW('704E') )
       filter("SYS_P5"."PATHID"=HEXTORAW('704E') )
11 - access("SYS_P5"."RID"="SYS_P3"."RID" AND "SYS_P3"."PATHID"=HEXTORAW('0BBD') AND
              "SYS_P3"."ORDER_KEY"<"SYS_P5"."ORDER_KEY")
       filter(SYS_ORDERKEY_DEPTH("SYS_P3"."ORDER_KEY")+1=SYS_ORDERKEY_DEPTH("SYS_P5"."ORDER_KEY") AND
              TBL$OR$IDX$PART$NUM("DEV"."INT_PART_TABLE",0,7,65535,"SYS_P3"."RID")=TBL$OR$IDX$PART$NUM("DEV"."INT_PART_TABLE_PT",0,7,65535,ROWI
              D) AND "SYS_P5"."ORDER_KEY"<SYS_ORDERKEY_MAXCHILD("SYS_P3"."ORDER_KEY"))
12 - filter(SYS_XMLI_LOC_ISNODE("SYS_P3"."LOCATOR")=1)
16 - filter("SYS_P5"."VALUE"='144283' AND SYS_XMLI_LOC_ISNODE("SYS_P5"."LOCATOR")=1 AND SUBSTRB("VALUE",1,1599)='144283' AND
              (LNNVL("SYS_P5"."VALUE"='9085802') OR LNNVL("SYS_P5"."PATHID"=HEXTORAW('704E') ) OR
              LNNVL(SYS_XMLI_LOC_ISNODE("SYS_P5"."LOCATOR")=1) OR LNNVL(SUBSTRB("VALUE",1,1599)='9085802')))
17 - access("SYS_P5"."PATHID"=HEXTORAW('704E') )
       filter("SYS_P5"."PATHID"=HEXTORAW('704E') )
19 - access("SYS_P5"."RID"="SYS_P3"."RID" AND "SYS_P3"."PATHID"=HEXTORAW('0BBD') AND
              "SYS_P3"."ORDER_KEY"<"SYS_P5"."ORDER_KEY")
       filter(SYS_ORDERKEY_DEPTH("SYS_P3"."ORDER_KEY")+1=SYS_ORDERKEY_DEPTH("SYS_P5"."ORDER_KEY") AND
              TBL$OR$IDX$PART$NUM("DEV"."INT_PART_TABLE",0,7,65535,"SYS_P3"."RID")=TBL$OR$IDX$PART$NUM("DEV"."INT_PART_TABLE_PT",0,7,65535,ROWI
              D) AND "SYS_P5"."ORDER_KEY"<SYS_ORDERKEY_MAXCHILD("SYS_P3"."ORDER_KEY"))
20 - filter(SYS_XMLI_LOC_ISNODE("SYS_P3"."LOCATOR")=1)
21 - filter("ITEM_2"=TBL$OR$IDX$PART$NUM("DEV"."INT_PART_TABLE",0,7,65535,"INT_PART_TABLE".ROWID))I asked in one of your other threads if /main/id was unique per XML document.
If so, you can use a simple function-based index instead of the XMLIndex :
SQL> drop index int_part_table_uix;
Index dropped.
SQL> create index int_part_table_ix1 on int_part_table (
2    xmlcast(
3      xmlquery('/main/id' passing XML_MESSAGE returning content)
4      as varchar2(10)
5    )
6 );
Index created.
SQL> SELECT xml_message
2 FROM int_part_table
3 WHERE XMLCast(
4          XMLQuery('/main/id' PASSING xml_message RETURNING CONTENT)
5          AS VARCHAR2(10)
6        )
7 IN ('144283', '9085802');
XML_MESSAGE
<main>
<id>144283</id>
</main>
<main>
<id>9085802</id>
</main>
Execution Plan
Plan hash value: 2864653096
| Id | Operation                           | Name               | Rows | Bytes | Cost (%CPU)| Time | Pstart| Pstop |
|   0 | SELECT STATEMENT                    |                    |     2 |   236 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
|   1 | INLIST ITERATOR                    |                    |       |       |            |       | |       |
|   2 |   TABLE ACCESS BY GLOBAL INDEX ROWID| INT_PART_TABLE     |     2 |   236 |     2   (0)| 00:00:01 |     1 |     1 |
|* 3 |    INDEX RANGE SCAN                 | INT_PART_TABLE_IX1 |     2 |       |     1   (0)| 00:00:01 |       |       |
Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
   3 - access(CAST(EXTRACTVALUE(SYS_MAKEXML(0,"SYS_NC00003$"),'/main/id',null,0,0,524293,1073874944) AS
              varchar2(10)   )='144283' OR CAST(EXTRACTVALUE(SYS_MAKEXML(0,"SYS_NC00003$"),'/main/id',null,0,0,524293,1073874944
              ) AS varchar2(10)   )='9085802')

Error ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel in droppping a table

Good evening,
I am very new on Oracle and I have a problem with some tables. Without any reason, apparently, I can't drop some of my table. Oracle gives me this error:
ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel
and then close the connection of the user.
What I should have to do?
It is very important.
Thanks a lot
best regards
Anna Zanetti

Good morning, I still have the same problem, I can't drop a table from my database.
The message is again:
Re: Error ORA-03113: end-of-file on communication channel
The alert log file says:
Fri Nov 17 12:27:31 2006
Errors in file /usr/oracle/admin/oracledb/udump/oracledb_ora_4369.trc:
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [0955C61F] [SIGSEGV] [Address not mapped to object] [0xC] [] []
and in file oracledb_ora_4369.trc there is:
Exception signal: 11 (SIGSEGV), code: 1 (Address not mapped to object), addr: 0xc, PC: [0x955c61f, 0955C61F]
Registers:
%eax: 0x00000000 %ebx: 0x00012d95 %ecx: 0x58301930
%edx: 0x00000000 %edi: 0x5830d9e8 %esi: 0x00000000
%esp: 0xbfffae1c %ebp: 0xbfffb060 %eip: 0x0955c61f
%efl: 0x00210282
(0x955c61f) movzw 0xc(%eax),%eax(0x955c623) cmp $30,%eax
(0x955c626) jle 0x955c63e
(0x955c628) xor %edx,%edx
(0x955c62a) push %edx
*** 2006-11-17 12:27:31.658
ksedmp: internal or fatal error
ORA-07445: exception encountered: core dump [0955C61F] [SIGSEGV] [Address not mapped to object] [0xC] [] []
Current SQL statement for this session:
drop table fiumiforjoin
----- Call Stack Trace -----
calling call entry argument values in hex
location type point (? means dubious value)
08856247 call 0885776A 1 ? 0 ? 1 ? 1 ? 0 ? 0 ?
08290320 call 0885605A 3 ? 0 ? 0 ? 0 ? 0 ? 0 ?
0955C61F signal 08290320 B ? BFFFAAB0 ? BFFFAB30 ?
0955D6BE call 0955C61F 5830F01C ? 0 ? FFFFFFFF ? 0 ?
1 ? 5830F01C ?
08DD1EEB call 0955CC22 BFFFB394 ? 0 ? 0 ? BFFFB348 ?
58EAB2B0 ? C ?
09434EF3 call 08DD1A28 BF2A8C4 ? BFFFC0C0 ?
BFFFC0C0 ? 4 ? B6AB0300 ?
B6ABC2E0 ?
094106E0 call 094326D4 4 ? 0 ? BFFFC0C0 ?
093D7BB5 call 0940FEF8 3 ? E ? BFFFC1F8 ? A4 ?
093D630C call 093D7AC4 BFFFCDF0 ? BFFFCD08 ? 17 ?
1 ? 0 ? A4 ?
08293DE6 call 0850FFFF 5E ? 14 ? BFFFCDEC ?
0A1ED44D call 08293DE6 5E ? 14 ? BFFFCDEC ? 0 ?
08292122 call 0A1ECAE4 BF2A8C0 ? 5E ? BFFFCDEC ? 0 ?
BFFFD6E8 ? BFFFD6E4 ?
0941F190 call 0829193C 0 ? 0 ? BF2A8C0 ? BF83090 ?
F1 ? 0 ?
08293DE6 call 0850FFFF 3C ? 4 ? BFFFEB08 ?
08291238 call 082937A8 3C ? 4 ? BFFFEB08 ? 0 ?
0828F403 call 08291012 3C ? 4 ? BFFFEB08 ?
08274A3D call 0828F39C BFFFEAEC ? 3C ? 4 ?
BFFFEB08 ? B6CC017C ?
B6C1A17C ?
__libc_start_main() call 08274A3D 2 ? BFFFEBA4 ? BFFFEBB0 ? 0 ?
+218 B6C1C898 ? B7600020 ?
Any idea of what I have to do?
Thanks for your help..
Best Regards
Anna Zanetti

Unable to open database : error , ora-03113 end of file communication

Hi Guys ,
I am facing a serious issue with my database
machine Oracle Linux Tikanga 5
database : 10.2.0.1
Error : ora-03113
I was trying to drop a logfile , while inserting the data ....
I restored and tried recovering it but it recovers with message , media recover complete but doesnot allows to open the database
gives the same error : Error : ora-03113 end of file communication
alert_log shows
alter database recover if needed
start
Media Recovery Start
ORA-264 signalled during: alter database recover if needed
start
Wed Jan 9 16:20:18 2013
db_recovery_file_dest_size of 2048 MB is 40.79% used. This is a
user-specified limit on the amount of space that will be used by this
database for recovery-related files, and does not reflect the amount of
space available in the underlying filesystem or ASM diskgroup.
Wed Jan 9 16:22:02 2013
alter database recover datafile list clear
Wed Jan 9 16:22:02 2013
Completed: alter database recover datafile list clear
Wed Jan 9 16:22:02 2013
alter database recover datafile list
1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5
Completed: alter database recover datafile list
1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5
Wed Jan 9 16:22:02 2013
alter database recover if needed
start
Media Recovery Start
ORA-264 signalled during: alter database recover if needed
start
Wed Jan 9 16:22:07 2013
alter database open
Wed Jan 9 16:22:07 2013
LGWR: STARTING ARCH PROCESSES
ARC0 started with pid=16, OS id=2049
Wed Jan 9 16:22:07 2013
ARC0: Archival started
ARC1: Archival started
LGWR: STARTING ARCH PROCESSES COMPLETE
ARC1 started with pid=17, OS id=2051
Wed Jan 9 16:22:07 2013
Repairing half complete open of thread 1
Wed Jan 9 16:22:07 2013
Errors in file /d1/app/oracle/oradata/orcl/bdump/orcl_lgwr_1966.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [3712], [1], [1], [0], [445262], [0], [445261], []
Wed Jan 9 16:22:08 2013
Errors in file /d1/app/oracle/oradata/orcl/bdump/orcl_lgwr_1966.trc:
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [3712], [1], [1], [0], [445262], [0], [445261], []
LGWR: terminating instance due to error 470
Instance terminated by LGWR, pid = 1966
can you please suggest on the same ..
Thanks

Due to the nature of the error and to prevent any trial-and-error, I would highly recommand you to open a service request with Oracle asap.
Oracle too recommands the same.
Thanks...

Create end of file character in email attachment

Hi all,
Currently I am attaching a text file to the email send using FM 'SO_NEW_DOCUMENT_ATT_SEND_API1'.
But here the issue is, in attachment file there are extra 3 blank lines are getting filled which client does't want.
Is there any way to generate end of file character, to add after all rows got filled in internal table?
Or is there any way to not to filled blank lines at the end of the file?
Please advise a solution.
Thanks and Regards
Nishad

Hi,
gs_packinglist-doc_size = gf_count * 255 .
This is how I am passing the doc_size. In the above, gf_count is the number rows in attachment file that I am multiplying with 255 characters as I am passing attachment in contents_bin parameter.
Thanks and regards
Nishad

Labview end of file encountere​d

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for

Labview end of file encountered