Large memo meta-data field not fully indexed

Hi all,
Another day, another UCM question. Hopefully the answers given to my questions will help people facing the same issues.
We created a custom meta-data field of type memo. Looking into the database, the following columns were created:
colmeta.xcustom1 varchar2(2000)
docmeta.xcustom1 varchar2(2000)
idctext1.xcustom1 varchar2(2000)
idctext2.xcustom1 varchar2(2000)
indexerstate.xcustom1 varchar2(2000)
We want specific meta-data field to hold 5000 characters and to have its content retrievable by the full text search feature. We've read about the MinMemoFieldSize and MemoFieldSize configuration variables, but reasoned that they shouldn't be used since the size requirement is only for this specific field.
So we've updated the database schema manually (can't seem to find another way to do this) by sending these instructions:
alter table colmeta modify xcustom1 varchar2(5000)
alter table docmeta modify xcustom1 varchar2(5000)
Then restarted the UCM server and performed a full collection index rebuild.
These updates work in that new content can be created with a meta-data value of up to 5000 characters (it would give an error before). However, it seems that the whole field value is not being indexed: doing a full-text search on a word in the first 2000 field characters finds the content, but doing a full-text search on a word in the last 3000 field characters doesn't.
We've tried manually extending the size of the idctext1, idctext2 and indexerstate columns, but it doesn't seem to have any impact.
Any ideas?
Thanks again.
Edited by: Spiff on 1-Feb-2012 12:32 PM

Hi ,
Please check the following post's last update .
Metadata fields sizes
Thanks
Srinath

Similar Messages

Changing the Default meta data field property required into not required.

Hi,
Is it possible to change the default meta data field property values in UCM server.
For example consider the meta data Revision field which property required is true, then how to change this property required into not required.
Is this possible or not?
Thanks
Hari

Hari,
in your case (if you don't want to use versioning) I'd rather recommend to change it to hidden than not required. You should be able to do it with standard profiles (the field name, I believe, is dRevision)
I don't think you can have the field empty (in case someone deletes the content).

Time/Date Field Not Returned in PDF

I have created a very simple form in LiveCycle Designer 8.0. The form enables the user to input data into columns labeled "name," "change type," and "change date." I used the date/time object for the "change date" row fields.
When my testers (using Acrobat 7.0) email the saved form back to me, all of the fields are populated with the information they entered, except the "change date" column fields. I asked if they used the flyout calendar or typed in the date manually, and all used the calendar.
Is this a compatibility issue, or is there something I need to do to bind the chose value to the field when the form is saved?

The issue with the time portion of date field not displaying in Data tab of a Table window has been posted before - see date format while browsing data
I still get the problem in v1215 connecting to either 9i or 10g databases. Note that this problem does not happen in the SQL Worksheet results area, so simply querying the table data with a select doesn't test this.
As for Ctrl-C, Ctrl-V changing the date format to MM/DD/YYYY HH24:MI:SS when copying data out of the SQL Worksheet Results - I also still get this in v1215.

UCM Meta-data Fields Limt

My DocMeta table has 50 columns. we are building lots of applications in UCM. Every application has its own meta-data requirements. I doubt that pretty soon the column count will increase to 100+. Is there any limitation in UCM on number of custom meta-data fields that we can create? if my DocMeta columns count increases to 100, would it affect the queries/UCM performance ?
thanks

It would depend on the underlying database from a technical standpoint.
A good discussion for Oracle database limits - Limit on a number of columns in a table?
MS SQLServer - http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms143432.aspx
From a usability/maintenance standpoint, that's another matter. YMMV.

Date Field in the Index when Apending Emails to PDF only shows received date

Hi,
I have Adobe Professional X with Outlook 2010 and I need to create a pdf with an index of about 1300 emails that are a mix of send and received items. For legal reasons I need to be able to sort them by sent date, however there is only one date field visible when I look at the columns in the pdf. this field seems to be the received date.
Does anyone know anyway to change this or to add another field so that I can see the send date of emails?
Thanks
Lance

Hi,
Hi segment E1P0000 is standard segment, you will not be able to make any changes. As per requirement you need to create the z<segment> with required field and assign the corresponding data element(as per your data type requirement).
Thanks,
Asit Purbey.

Oracle date field not comparing properly with to_date function

Hi, i'm facing a very weird problem. I'm triyng to retrieve a range of records in between two dates. However, it doesn't seem to understand. What am i doing wrong?
let's say my table (MYRECORD) has this (where id is varchar and date is DATE and not timestamp) :
ID DATE
1 22-JAN-08
2 22-JAN-08
3 21-JAN-10
4 11-FEB-10
5 11-FEB-10
So, let's say iwanna get the records from 21st Jan 2010 :
select
date as ori_date from MYRECORD where
date = to_date('21/01/2010','DD/MM/YYYY')
1.)
it is not returning any record at all. I'm having problems with between dates and the to_date function as well,
so i'm trying to get the 'equal' part working first. I can't use to_char because at the end of the day,
i need to compare between dates.
what am i doing wrong? has this got anything to do with what kind of format is set up on the oracle server?
running :
SELECT value FROM v$nls_parameters WHERE parameter ='NLS_DATE_FORMAT'
returns DD-MON-RR
2.) how do we compare dates from the table according to our own specified format from our passed string? I only have READONLY access to this database
so i can't set anything up.

please run this
select To_date(date, 'DD/MM/YYYY HH24:MI:SS') as ori_date from MYRECORDprobably you have hour minute second info in your table, to_date('01012010','DDMMYYYY') means hour, minute and second is 00:00:00 so it wont be equal.The database field type is actually 'DATE' and not datetime. I've also ran the sql you provided to show its timestamp, but it's not showing anything as far as timestamp is concerned. It's showing only the date. So does this mean it's a real date only information?
However, it might be more efficient to do two comparisons, especially if there's an index on dt:
WHERE   dt >= TO_DATE ('21/01/2010', 'DD/MM/YYYY')
AND     dt < TO_DATE ('22/01/2010', 'DD/MM/YYYY')
Ok. If we change the range to compare it on the same day, it won't work;
WHERE   dt >= TO_DATE ('21/01/2010', 'DD/MM/YYYY')
AND     dt <= TO_DATE ('21/01/2010', 'DD/MM/YYYY')this also happens if we're using BETWEEN
this is real weird. It's supposed to work...i don't recall having this kind of issue on other databases. If that's the case,
each time a user passes me a date string i have to somehow add another day onto its 'to' comparison date in order for things to work.
but..i don't want to since i don't want to accidentally include the extra day's results!
Edited by: 803998 on Oct 21, 2010 8:14 PM
Edited by: 803998 on Oct 21, 2010 8:33 PM

Data fields not filled in DSO Activation

Dear All,
I have written an End routine to extract data into a DSO to fill some data fields. The End routine will perform a lookup on another DSO and modifies the records of the result_package. The data fields are characteristics and hence in the transformation, they are set to No Transformation.
When I extracted the data into DSO, the new table has all the data fields correctly filled. But, after activating the request, all the data fileds data are erased. However, the keyfields data is still available in the Active table.
Can you please help me on this.
Thanks,
Srinivas

Hi Srinivas
I have faced the same issue.Data was coming till new table,but after activation fields were getting
blank.
There is no necessity for doing a dummy mapping. In the transformation screen you will be having an ikon near to the delete
routine symbol with an arrow symbol
similar to select all and unselect all, just clikc on it and then mention the setting as Update all the target fields need to be populated.
This will solve the issue, if it is not solved, then you can make a direct mapping to any of the field in the source, it need not be the
exact field in the target.
Thanks,
Saveen Kumar

Date field not working like a date field

We have quite a few date objects in the Universe but only some seem to function as a date field whereas some do not.
The easiest way to tell whether a date field is functioning as a date field seems to be to add the date fields as a filter in a query. If it is a proper date field a Calendar option appears. If it is not, no Calendar option appears.
In the screenshot below, the Latest Approved Date functions like a proper date object and shows a calendar option. The other field does not even though it is a date field too.
I'm checking with this forum as the Universe designer didn't have any answer for this.

HI Vivek,
Go to Universe Designer
click on object (Latest Approved Date)
click on definition
go to TYPE scroll down and select type as DATE
and export now check the filter it will work
try once
Regards,
Ranjeet

Date field not updated when select on F4 value on editable ALV Grid

Can some one look into this to see what was wrong.
I have a report that display fields extracted from a ZTable and display on an ALV Editable Grid.
The data are displayed as read only mode for these fields:
Field A -   type char20 and have a search help available.
Start Date - type dats
End Date - type dats.
Field B
Field C ...
When user select to add new record, Field A, Start Date and End Date must be editable, the rest are read only.
On field A because there is search help available, I have no problem select data on F4 pull down menu and the data is updated on the grid.
But on field start date and end date, there is F4 menu and when you pull down, it shows the calendar date. But when I select the date to change, it acts like nothing happens. I run the debug mode and found out that in function module 'F4IF_FIELD_VALUE_REQUEST', after you select the date field, I got the return code irc = 8 from line 305 of this FM.
Here is what I did.
I build field catalog similar like BCALV_EDIT04 (add table type lvc_t_styl to each extracted record to indicate which field will be editable.
In the PBO, I build field catalog and set style as enable for these fields:
CALL FUNCTION 'LVC_FIELDCATALOG_MERGE'
    EXPORTING
      i_structure_name = p_struct
    CHANGING
      ct_fieldcat      = p_t_fieldcat.
LOOP AT p_t_fieldcat INTO ls_fcat.
    CASE   ls_fcat-fieldname.
       when 'Field_A'.
           ls_fcat-ref_table = 'ZTABNAME'.
        ls_fcat-ref_field = 'FIELD_A'.
        ls_fcat-edit = 'X'.
        MODIFY p_t_fieldcat FROM ls_fcat.
   when 'START_DATE' or 'END_DATE'.
    ls_fcat-style = CL_GUI_ALV_GRID=>MC_STYLE_enabled.
         MODIFY p_t_fieldcat FROM ls_fcat.
   endcase.
Just curious, I copied program BCALV_EDIT_08 to ZBCALV_EDIT08 and make field booking date as editable to test. When I select to change booking date from F4 menu pull down, the new date is populated to the screen field. So what was wrong between my program and BCALV_EDIT_08? Thanks for your help. I am stuck on this problem for 2 days and could not figure out what was wrong.

not sure why you use that FM for date filed , you just need in the field catalog make sure that are use a date field of reference , anyway check program BCALV_EDIT_01

Date field not retent in Adobe form - Review

Hi,
I have a date field(Last day worked) which is not bound to any data view field in SFP transaction. When the form is in a Edit mode, I select a date in Last day worked field. After I click on Click & Send option, the form is in Review mode (with field editable), the Last day worked field goes blank.
How do I save the value that I entered in Edit mode.
Kindly advice.
Thanks,
Gowri

You should bind the field to an attribute.
Regards,
Antony

Inbound Idoc - Date fields not getting saved

Hello,
I have created inbound idoc scenario in SAP. I receive Idoc from non SAP system to SAP system.
then data from IDoc is saved into different tables, for that I have written one function module (attached to process code)
One of the segments in IDoc type has date as a field. It is of type sy-datum.
When I receive Idoc in SAP only date fields are not getting saved in tables.
Is anything specific need to be done for date fields? please advice.

check which format you are getting into sap and make sure you are coverting in into required format.

Search Page by date field not showing up results

Hi,
I am using Jdev 11g and new to adf.
My applciation needs a search page based on a date field.
I created a viewcriteria for the object which expects a date field from the user.( the bind variable is of type Date)
After this i dragged the viewcriteria as af:query (panel with table) on the jspx page.
Now when i run the application, that is when i enter the date (calendar autogenerated by query component),
it does not show up any results.
My date field in the database has a timestamp attached to it, somewhere i read that the timestamp may be causing the problem.
But i have not found any solution for this one.
This looks very basic to me, i am sure i am missing soemthing important.
Besides i even tried the approach of programmaticlly populating the Viewobject(by not using the any query component),
i can see the Viewobject being populated in the logs( the row count) but on the display page, no rows are shown.
I am sure i am doing something wrong for this one.
      AppModuleImpl am = this.getAm();
       ViewObject submittalVO = am.findViewObject("AcrSubmittallogView1");
       System.out.println("after getting VO");
       String subDate = this.getSubDate().getValue().toString();
       String query = " to_char(SubmitDtTm,'mm/dd/yyyy') = '"+subDate+"'";
       submittalVO.setWhereClause(query);
       System.out.println("QUERY>>>> "+submittalVO.getQuery());
       submittalVO.executeQuery();
      System.out.println("after executing query "+submittalVO.getRowCount());
       this.setRenderLogTable(true);But i actually want to use the built in query component instead of programmatically doing it.
Can someone please guide me further.
Any help will be grt.
Thanks in advance
ash
Edited by: user1175461 on Jul 15, 2010 1:18 PM

Still not working for me either, here's exactly what I'm doing.
My query is as follows:
SELECT
RO.repair_line_id,
RO.repair_number,
SR.customer_po_number, segment1,
trunc(RO.creation_date) as creation_date,
I've created a Bind Variable for the creation_date as follows:
<Variable
Name="createDate"
Kind="viewcriteria"
Type="oracle.jbo.domain.Date"/>
Which is linked to a view criteria:
<ViewCriteria
Name="RepairSearchVVOCriteria"
ViewObjectName="com.services.cs.vvo.RepairSearchVVO"
Conjunction="AND">
<Properties>
<CustomProperties>
<Property
Name="displayOperators"
Value="InAdvancedMode"/>
<Property
Name="autoExecute"
Value="false"/>
<Property
Name="allowConjunctionOverride"
Value="true"/>
<Property
Name="showInList"
Value="true"/>
<Property
Name="mode"
Value="Basic"/>
</CustomProperties>
</Properties>
<ViewCriteriaRow
Name="vcrow1"
UpperColumns="1">
<ViewCriteriaItem
Name="CreationDate"
ViewAttribute="CreationDate"
Operator="="
Conjunction="AND"
Value=":createDate"
IsBindVarValue="true"
Required="Optional"/>
</ViewCriteriaRow>
</ViewCriteria>
I then dragged the criteria into the page. When running it I get the following:
AND SR.customer_id =:psCustomerId) QRSLT WHERE ( ( (CREATION_DATE = :createDate ) ) )
<ViewObjectImpl><bindParametersForCollection> [3510] Bind params for ViewObject: [com.xxx.services.cs.vvo.RepairSearchVVO]RepairSearchAM.RepairSearchVVO1
<OracleSQLBuilderImpl><bindParamValue> [3511] Binding param "psCustomerId": 34758
<OracleSQLBuilderImpl><bindParamValue> [3512] Binding param "createDate": 2010-02-18
Which never brings back any data. My date's look as follows in the database:
'18-FEB-10'
I never get any results for the date. I've also tried using the to_char to format the date as the same format, but that always gives a variety of errors. This is driving me batty =0 Any ideas on why it never pulls back data?
Thanks, Graeme.

Custom Date Field not showing up in Pages Inspector

I created a custom date field in Address Book and now want to merge info from Address Book into a Pages template I created (including this new custom date field). When I go to the Inspector to add the custom date field to the template, it is not listed as a field - only Anniversary and Birthday are listed as "other" fields.
How do I get the custom date field to show up in the inspector?
Chris

Question asked and responded several times.
The Help is unaware of the true program behaviour.
In version 3, custom AddressBook fields are not usable in Pages.
_Go to "Provide Pages Feedback" in the "Pages" menu_, describe what you wish.
Then, cross your fingers, and wait _at least_ for iWork'09
Yvan KOENIG (from FRANCE samedi 8 novembre 2008 18:13:21)

CRVS2010 beta - date field not display in details section

I use Visual stdio 2010 so i install crystal report 2010 for report.
It work fine .
but in report detail section there is date field then it will not be display.
alos if we do group on date field it will give error when we try to open report.
Plese geve me possible soluction for date field problem.
Edited by: hitesh_tatva1 on Jun 22, 2010 11:35 AM
Edited by: Don Williams on Jun 22, 2010 7:20 AM

Solution Found
Don't install sp2it sucksclassic case of the cure being worse than the disease.
Downloading and installing the SP3 redisist fixed the issue.
This link is probably appropriate:
https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/bobj_download/main.htm
Software Product->select Crystal Reports
Version->select Crystal Reports 2008
important part
Software Type->Utility Click Search Download the redist install.
Not very intuitive, but you'll need to do this so you download the runtime and not the full version.
Hope that saves you the 5 hours it took me to figure this darn thing out...I hate unintuitive products--they aren't very professional.
+
SAP, where do I send the bill for supporting your own product?
I too have the same problem. Hopefully we can get a solution to this soon as the delayed release of the 2010 runtime has us in a difficult place.
The problem: I upgraded my project to Visual Studio 2010; therefore, I upgraded to the Crystal Reports for Studio 2010 beta.
Everything worked fine until I modified the app.config so that I could deploy the application into our test environment. We do not have Visual Studio installed in this environment, so we needed to have a Crystal Reports Runtime. According to the SAP website deployment guide, currently the only way to deploy a 2010 app is to use the 2008 runtime by modifying the app.config file to redirect the bindings.
__Now, none of my date fields appear on the reports.__
Just to test, in my development environment, I commented out the redirects in the app.config and the dates appeared. I uncommented the redirects so that the 2008 runtime would be used and then my dates disappeared from the report.
Here is the entry I put into the app.config:
<runtime>
    <assemblyBinding xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:asm.v1">
      <dependentAssembly>
        <assemblyIdentity name="CrystalDecisions.CrystalReports.Engine" publicKeyToken="692fbea5521e1304" />
        <bindingRedirect oldVersion="14.0.2000.0" newVersion="12.0.2000.0"/>
      </dependentAssembly>
      <dependentAssembly>
        <assemblyIdentity name="CrystalDecisions.Shared" publicKeyToken="692fbea5521e1304" />
        <bindingRedirect oldVersion="14.0.2000.0" newVersion="12.0.2000.0"/>
      </dependentAssembly>
      <dependentAssembly>
        <assemblyIdentity name="CrystalDecisions.ReportSource" publicKeyToken="692fbea5521e1304" />
        <bindingRedirect oldVersion="14.0.2000.0" newVersion="12.0.2000.0"/>
      </dependentAssembly>
      <dependentAssembly>
        <assemblyIdentity name="CrystalDecisions.Windows.Forms" publicKeyToken="692fbea5521e1304" />
        <bindingRedirect oldVersion="14.0.2000.0" newVersion="12.0.2000.0"/>
      </dependentAssembly>
      <dependentAssembly>
        <assemblyIdentity name="CrystalDecisions.Enterprise.Framework" publicKeyToken="692fbea5521e1304" />
        <bindingRedirect oldVersion="14.0.2000.0" newVersion="12.0.1100.0"/>
      </dependentAssembly>
      <dependentAssembly>
        <assemblyIdentity name="CrystalDecisions.Enterprise.InfoStore" publicKeyToken="692fbea5521e1304" />
        <bindingRedirect oldVersion="14.0.2000.0" newVersion="12.0.1100.0"/>
      </dependentAssembly>
    </assemblyBinding>
</runtime>
Your help is much appreciated.
Thanks,
Michael
Edited by: SaganDraxan on Jul 16, 2010 8:23 PM

Adding a custom meta data field which lists out content id based on query

How can we add a custom meta data filed which lists out content id based on query like dDocType <matches> `AssociatedProduct`?
Or other alternative would be to have a custom metadata field such that it allows selection of content id using link wizard which we typically use in site studio. It would be preferable to have this second option as it is user friendly. Can we do this on a check-in screen?
-Pratap

Thanks for the reply Deepak.
We got it resolved. We did following changes in /ucm/custom/SiteStudio/resources/ss_custom_field_resources.htm file and it worked cleanly.
Added following section at the end before body tag
===================================================================================================
<@dynamichtml ss_parent_definition_field_entry@>
     <$include super.std_edit_entry$>
     <$if isQuery and isTrue(isQuery)$></td><td><$endif$>
     <$include ss_contributor_base_scripts$>
     <script type="text/javascript" src="<$HttpRelativeWebRoot$>resources/<$SSContributorSourceDir$>/sitestudio/wcm.contentserver.popup.js"></script>
     <script language="JavaScript">
     function OnSelectParentId()
          var selectParentIdOptions = {};
          selectParentIdOptions.httpCgiPath = '<$HttpCgiPath$>';
          selectParentIdOptions.queryText = 'dDocType <matches> `Country`';
          selectParentIdOptions.coreContentOnly = '<$if coreContentOnly and isTrue(coreContentOnly)$>1<$else$>0<$endif$>';
          selectParentIdOptions.callback = function( returnParams )
               returnParams = returnParams || {};
               if( returnParams && returnParams['dDocName'] && ( returnParams.dDocName.length > 0 ) )
                    // Set the actual metadata value
                    <$if isQuery AND isTrue(isQuery)$>
                         for (var i=0; i < document.<$formName$>.elements.length; i++)
                              var elt=document.<$formName$>.elements;
                              if (elt.name=="<$fieldName$>")
                                   elt.value = returnParams.dDocName;
                    <$else$>
                         document.<$formName$>.<$fieldName$>.value = returnParams.dDocName;
                    <$endif$>
          WCM.ContentServerPopup.ChooseManagedDocument(selectParentIdOptions);
     </script>
     <input type="button" value="<$lc("wwBrowse")$>..." onclick="OnSelectParentId();">
<@end@>
======================================================================================
Then modified the section which show xWebsiteSection, xRegionDefinition etc to include my custom meta data defitnion as well ('xParentContentType')
===================================================================
<@dynamichtml std_edit_entry@>
     <$if fieldName and ( fieldName like "xWebsites|xDontShowInListsForWebsites" )$>
          <$include ss_website_query_text_field$>
     <$elseif fieldName and strEquals( fieldName, "xWebsiteSection" )$>
          <$include ss_website_section_field_entry$>
     <$elseif fieldName and strEquals( fieldName, "xRegionDefinition" )$>
          <$include ss_region_definition_field_entry$>
     <$elseif fieldName and strEquals( fieldName, "xParentContentType" )$>
          <$include ss_parent_definition_field_entry$>
     <$else$>
          <$include super.std_edit_entry$>
     <$endif$>
<@end@>
====================================================================
This worked fine.
Regards,
Pratap

Large memo meta-data field not fully indexed

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for