Late deliveries by vendor

Hi Gurus,
is there a way we can try to capture the following informatiuon. We need to measure late deliveries. A report is needed or a transaction that can be extracted into excel that shows late deleveries by computing the number of days difference between the scheduled delivery date as it's stated on the PO verses the actual reciept date. We have a GR processing time of 1 day for all materials.
Thanks
Ansuha

hii
U can tyr with transaction MB52.
In this report u 'll get GR date and PO document date .
IFu want exact date difference with GR date and PO delivery date .
Dicuss with technical consultant and get the help of then creat a custom reports using thes transaction , ME2N,MB52.
I hope this will help u .
Revert any clarification.
Thansk
SAP_MM

Similar Messages

Help scheduling tasks from both project start date and from later deliverable dates

I am trying to set up a project scheduling template for a number of similar projects.
These projects will require initial work to be completed at the project start date, working through the critical path to an end date.
However. Certain milestones/deliverables are required on specific dates in teh project (they are recievable by internal customers on firm dates). I am having trouble scheduling my predecessors for these deliverables to occur as late as possible.
I.e. I want my procurement to start x-weeks (depending on the task) before the deliverable is due.
Trying to manually set the deliverable date and hoping project will work back and adjust the predecessors to fit isnt quite working... is this possible?
Im using MSP2010 standard

nategalambos,
Actually this is probably a very common scheduling scenario. Schedules often have interim milestones, sometimes with fixed dates.
Just-in-time scheduling has received a fair amount of press in the past but in my view it has some very real negative downsides. I believe the best plans have contingency built in to allow for unknown problems. For example, let's say you have a task that
must deliver an item on a particular date and in order to build that item you need to order material. You know the built and test time, it's all done by machine, takes 10 days, and doesn't vary from item to item. The lead time for the material is 6 weeks,
so you set up the schedule to place the material order 8 weeks before the delivery date. However, there is a problem, the vendor who supplies the material has a problem at his factory and the material is delayed such that it won't be delivered in 6 weeks but
instead it will take 8 weeks. Because you have not allowed for contingency in your plan, your delivery date is now in jeopardy.
But to answer your question, one way to set up the predecessor you want is as follows. Using my example above, the Place Order task, let's say the delivery date task is task ID 5 and is a milestone. The place order task could have a predecessor of 5SF-40d,
or 5FS-40d will also work if the place order task and the delivery date are both milestones.
Hope this helps.
You might also want to read Trevor's response to a related post on the following forum: http://answers.microsoft.com/en-us/office/forum/office_2010-project/field-for-start-based-on-as-soon-as-possible/45829d8b-b073-4fbf-8126-0bdac5c7684c
John

On-time deliveries from vendor

Hi,
Is there any transaction or report where i can get the number of on-time deliveries from a vendor.I don't want to implement vendor evauation.
Thanks in advance,
Kumar

Hi,
Do not think there is an option for this other than vendor evaluation
Regards,
Ashwin

BAPI for MIGO - Movement Type 122 - Return deliveries to vendor

Hi,
I've been reading about bapi's for migo and the most commom was: BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE
But I want to do a Movement Type 122, and that is not supported by the BAPI.
Any idea beside Batch Input ?

Ildar,
Try this:
GOODSMVT_HEADER:
PSTNG_DATE
DOC_DATE
REF_DOC_NO (mandatory)
GOODSMVT_CODE = 01
GOODSMVT_ITEM
MATERIAL
PLANT
STGE_LOC
MOVE_TYPE = 122
ENTRY_QNT
PO_NUMBER
PO_ITEM
MVT_IND = B (reference to the document that has the request )
MOVE_REAS (mandatory as well)
Let me know if you need any further help.
Francisco Coutinho,
ToInovate

Vendor Evaluation Standardizing Delivery Date Variance

Hi,
We are determining what the settings should be for On-Time Delivery and Quantity Reliability under Vendor Evaluation. I understand how the formual works when it determines the scores for these. Can someone tell me from a business process perspective what Standardizing Delivery Date Variance relates to?
Ours has been set to 100 which is 100 days with the scores set as:
Percentage
Score
0
100
10
90
20
95
100
80
200
60
300
40.......
When we pick 100 days, is that supposed to be an average of how many days late goods receipts are? Or is there another way to look at it?
Thanks
Beverly

Have you really read the documentation and the F1 field help, or any of our blogs, documents and wikis here in SCN?
The table that you presented above is far a way from reality. a percentage can go from blank to 99.9 and your from -99.9 to blank
this is to cover both situations early deliveries and late deliveries
the Standard Delivery Date Variance means the it is the maximum number of days a vendor can be late or early to the wanted delivery date, if this value is reached, then he just missed the point in the sense of the word. he does not get any single point for his performance.
You have to ask your business how much days variance they accept before they cancel the order, or at least looking for a new vendor with the next order.
From our point of view everything beyond a week is not at all acceptable and results in a total miss
and in this case you do not need many percentages either in a 5 working day week each day corresponds to 20%

Return to Vendor with Shipping - Help with the credit memo

Hey guys,
I've configured return deliveries to vendors, using a return PO with shipping, then creating an RL delivery type > transfer order> post goods issue.
All that works fine. My trouble is trying to set up the credit memo. I'm not an SD consultant so I don't know too much about billing.
I go to VF01 to create the billing document, however I receive an error that the delivery type (RL) is not allowed for billing type F2. I know where the config is to set up this relationship (SD>Billing>Maintain Copying Control for Billing Documents), but I would have thought a different billing type (something for credit memos) would be used instead of F2.
In standard sales, the billing type is determined from the sales order type. As there is no sales order in this instance, where is the billing type being determined? Why is SAP trying to create my billing document with and F2 billing type.
Thanks for you help/info,
Mark.

Sorry, this is not clear to me.
If you send back goods to your vendor - generally - you send back the goods because those goods are damged. In this case it is your vendor who issues credit memo and not you to your vendor.
MM credit memo (that is issued by your vendor) can be posted in MIRO. If your vendor issues debit memo it can be posted in MIRO too.
Please check retrun delivery with mvt 122:
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/a5/63351643a211d189410000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
Return delivery with mvt 161:
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/a5/63341243a211d189410000e829fbbd/frameset.htm
So, I don't think you can do anything with your return delivery in VF01.
Regards,
Csaba

Vendor with interest

Late payment to vendor with interest of 5%.Vendor returns the interest amount.
assign points.

hi
interest calculation in fi two types 1 item interest calculation . 2 balance interest calculation.balance interest calculation type is used for gl a/cs . item interest calculation type is uesd for vendars and customers . item interest calculation is caluculating in dunning.
steps:
1 define interest calculation types(TC:OB46)
2 prepare account balance interest calculation (TC:OBAA)
3 define refference interest rates (TC:OBAC)
4 define time depedendant terms (TC:OB81)
5 enter interest values (TC:OB83)
6 (TC:XK02) assign item interest indicator in accounting information.
7 (TC:F-43) ppurchase invoice
8 dunning procedure (TC:FBMP)
9 cal dunning (TC:F150).
i think it is helpful for u
regards
sivareddy

Block the GR of late delivery item in PO

Hi All
We normally maintain multiple delivery schedule dates for all the PO items. For example the line item 1 qty is 100. But the delivery dates are split into as follows.
1. qty 50 - delivery date 14-05-2007
2. qty 50 - delivery date 25-05-2007 in the item details - delivery schedules.
Now the business requirement is to through an error message during MIGO for the late deliveries against the above dates.
I tried to use the Latest GR date in the item details delivery tab. It does not take into the multiple delivery dates. All it does is to check the multiple GRs against one controlling date.
Is there any other setting to check the GR against the multiple PO dates set in the item details - delivery schedules tab.
Please reply
Thanks in advance
Raj

Hi,
I don't think that there is a way of doibng this in standard SAP.
The latest delivery date (as you have found out) is not considering the delivery schedules on the PO it is simply checking against the date on the PO item line (which is the oldest date of the schedules that exist).
So I can only see a user exit in MIGO or a code modification being the answer. This should not be a risky modification because it just needs to substitute the schedule date for the check. The biggest problem is when you have multiple schedule lines, which line is relevant to the one being GRd? The system can't tell if it is the first one that is late or if it is a future one that is early. It would have to read throuigh the GRs so far and make assumptions about which deliveries relate wto which schedules .
For example, if you have 4 schedules each a week apart and each has a qty of 10. If there have been 15 received so far, which schedule is being GRd when the next items arrive? Is it the missing 5 (that may be late) or were the 5 an overdelivery and the next delivery may be from a future schedule?
I hope that you can see my point, the coding is not that simple.
My own recommendation is to use a simple ABAP to read through the schedules and report on any that appear to have not yet been delivered although the date has passed. So report on it rather than try to get MIGO to act. I know that this would be after the event but at least you would be able to return the stock.
If this solution is not acceptable, then the opnly other solution I can suggest is to NOT use schedule lines, just use one PO line for each delivery. I know this is extra work and not a simple task but I am not sure what else can be done?
Steve B

Delivery to Vendor / Goods Receipt from Customer

Hi all,
Our company receives samples from customers and delivers samples to vendors. However, SAP does not seem to allow deliveries to vendors nor goods receipts from customers. Can anyone advise on how to handle this situation?
Thanks,
Jane

Hi Jane,
Option 1:
Receive samples through Goods Receipt and deliver the samples through
Delivery document.
Option 2:
Create a Customer as a Vendor in different Customer code.
Book a Goods Receipt for receive a samples
Book a Delivery
*Close the thread if issue solved.
Regards
Jambulingam.P

Returns to vendor and their effect on on-time delivery calculation

Hi,
we're on ECC 6,0 and using vendor evaluation. We are using automatic calculation of on-time delivery. I have a question about how return deliveries to vendor affect the calculation of on-time delivery points. SAP documentation says "The system considers only reversals affecting goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these are the movement types 102 and 106." Return deliveries to vendor are made with movement type 122 and based on the above mentioned SAP text, only movement types 102 and 106 are considered in cancellation of scores. However, based on my testing, movement type 122 effects on-time delivery scores with the folllowing formula:
The system calculates the new overall score (OS) as follows:
Old OS - (score from last GR X smoothing factor) / 1 - smoothing factor = New OS
Does somebody have more information about how movement type 122 is considered in vendor evaluation?
Br,
Tapio
Edited by: Tapio Tuomela on Aug 25, 2009 1:45 PM

Hi Tapio,
what about 102 , it will simply deduct the score of it or it has different set of formulae
also i came to know that it will consider only closed PO's for its evaluation
Please let me know some details on the same
Regards,
Preeti.PG

Vendor Archive

Hi,
WE work on SRM 5.0 ECS.
It has been decided to archive inactive vendors in ECC.Does archiving and deletion mean same??Pls let me knowwhat effect it will have on SRM side???

No both are different concepts . i do remember in ECC you can set deletion indicator and run the sync job in SRM later the BP (vendor) sets archiving FLAG in BUT000 Table.
the same happens in ECC material master - deletion and in COMMPR01 - sets lock or archiving flag.

Apple unable to deliver my first iMac !

This is quite a bad first impression. After having been convinced by an Ipod Touch, I decided to become a switcher (and thus start a process that would have kicked out all windows based PC from our house) and ordered a promising iMac 27 i7 with 1To and SSD disk.
Paid with credit card on 26th nov (black friday, 100 EUR off the expensive stuff) and due to be delivered on the latest today...
As you can guess, we have been waiting for the baby... and ? NOTHING !
French customer support has just informed us that the box is in Ireland !!!
I was sure that this never happen with a MAC neither (no blue screen, no virus, no... no problem !).
I am indeed upset and my sons will probably make fun of me and my switcher attitude.
I can even not cancel the damned order as it has been shipped (at least, not yet).
Guess what has said the Apple girl ? OK, sir, you did indeed your part by paying the money, we are not to be blamed, it is the forwarder who is guilty (UPS). So what ? At least, a discount or any additional features would have calm me down.
Am I the only one or Apple is not becoming to big to run ?

Well, Roger, I suppose according to your message I am not supposed to give a further reply (argh too late !). Firstly thank you and so, I do apologize as I was probably reacting too quickly.
Well, I can feel you're "Apple" minded but in my world, product or service are to be delivered on time. I thought it was even more the case by Apple (which indeed commit to deliver on the latest today). Never, I could tell to a disappointed customer that I am not responsible, it is my forwarder : they have have chosen and dealt with UPS, not me ! Apple claim free delivery, but no delivery at all !
I was willing to switch because I can't take more from Windows world but since I started to dig in, I have heard also quite many issues by Apple stuff, from yellowish screen to riplocked superdrives, or useless Iphones !
OK, after all, perfectness does not exist... ouch, I have paid close to 2800 EUR, almost 3500 USD !!!
For further question, I promise, I'll go through the whole forum first, such as compensation for late deliveries...

Insert/Update/Delete Non-PO Invoice Line Item via FM/BAPI?

Does anyone know of a way to insert/update/delete an Invoice Line item (Non-PO Accounting Invoice - Transaction FB60 or FV60) using a BAPI or Function Module (or set of function modules) using ABAP? I have been trying to find some code to accomplish this and am stuck on a couple of issues.
I have found PRELIMINARY_POSTING_FB01 and PP_CHANGE_DOCUMENT_ENJ but both seem to submit the details to background processes. This is an issue because it gives the user a success message after execution but later delivers the error to Workflow. This is for an interfacing program so the results should be as real time as possible.
Has anyone accomplished this via FM or BAPI and if so would you mind sharing your experiences?
Thank you very much,
Andy

SG- Thank you for the reply.
I have been playing with BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_PARK and I'm not sure if it is doing exactly what we want, but it is something that I have considered in the past. I plan on looking into BAPI_ACC_INVOICE_RECEIPT_POST this morning, hopefully that will provide some more for us.
If possible I'd like to avoid BDC sessions because this program could hypothetically interface with multiple SAP systems with different configurations.
I will check into those FM's and thank you very much.

Purchase and release order not allowed for TECO work orders

Hi
We are typically setting maintenance work orders to TECO once the physical work as been performed as that sets the reference date for showing the history of when the maintenance was performed, and when the maintenance call was completed. However, we have invoices that may come in significantly later than when the physical work was performed.
Once the order is in TECO a purchase or release order (for services against a contract) cannot be created for the work order. Additionally it appears that even if we have a release order,or purchase order, if it is not for the exact amount of the invoice the release or purchase order cannot be ammended - we get the sameerror mssage (BS007) as when creating a new purchase order for the TECO order.
I had wondered about using BS22 to change TECO to continue to allow purchase and release orders when the order is in TECO status.
Any input on pros/cons or other approachs appreciated.
Philip

Thanks
That was what I initially thought. However I was informed that if the invoice is not for the originally determined amount that to post the invoice means having to change the PO, and changing the PO appears to hit the same business transaction as creating a PO, and so we get the error mssage.
The issue is that we may know we need to have services estimated at, say, $5.000. But we do not know what the actual final invoice will be. So the actual amount may end up being $4,500 or $5,500 as an example, and it may come ni late from the vendor. The Purchse Order side is not my expertize, but I am being informed that the invoice must match the PO amount, otherwise the PO must be ammended to match. As the order is in TECO, the user cannot amend the PO.
I would be happy to know of other options, or at least good questions to ask. I want the end user to be able to post the invoice against the PO, after the order is in TECO, even it the invoice amount is not exactly the same as what was originally anticipated.
regards
Philip

Accounting Entries for Materials Return from Production Order

Dear Gurus,
I have a scenario here that a raw material, valuated at moving average = 151 and qty = 100, was issued to a production order last month. Due to some issue the order was not completed for a while and 93 qty was consumed for the order and because the remaining 7 were excess they were returned to the storage location. By that time the MOV had changed from 151 to 185 and the 7 qty was returned not at 151 (which would be correct) but at 185. This is a wrong accounting entry as it is showing an under consumption for the order.
Anyone have an idea why the system is doing this because the material should be returned on the price it was issued at so that the accounting entries are knocked off (The accounting entries for return deliveries to vendors are of the same price that they are recieved no matter how ever long a period they are returned). How do we stop the system from doing so and if it cannot be done what is the solution to the scenario.
Regards,

The normal entires are as follows (depending on your configuration);
1) Goods issue;
Credit inventory and debit COGS;
2) Billing document;
Debit customer account credit sales accounts;
3) Payment;
Credit customer account and debit cash/ checking account
pls assign points if helpful as a way to say thanks.

Late deliveries by vendor

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for