Layout assignment to sites and assortments

Hi
In Layout concept,
it is poosible to assign the layout to the site / it is possible to assign the layout to the assortment.
Could any one help me what are the advantages of doing this.
Which one is better option. Assigning layout to site is good option or assigning layout to the assortment is a good option.
What are the benfits of doing this assignmnets.
Why sap has suggested these two methods.
can we simultaneously assign layout to sites and assortments.
Thanks
Varatharaj jayraman

Any capable retail expert, plz provide some idea on this. Moderator plz take up this issue to sap.

Similar Messages

Istore 11.5.10 - creating a new site and assigning existing users to that

Hi,
I need to create a new site in iStore and assign all the Canada customers to that site. Can you please let me know how to do this.
I though that I would create a custom responsibility ABC_IBE_CUSTOMER same as IBE_CUSTOMER and attach that responsibility to the new site and the same responsibility to all the canada custoemers and when they login they will directly been directed to the new site in the customer UI. But it did not happen like that. I might be missing many things inbetween. Can you please let me know the step by step process to achieve this.
Thanks,
Srikanth

function(){return A.apply(null,[this].concat($A(arguments)))}
Why adobe has not issued an update!!!.
Agreed. I'm disappointed that no patch has yet been issued. Hope we don't have to go on explaining this for the next 12 months.

Multiple Configuration Manager environments, 2 AD sites, and overlapping boundaries

Good morning all.
A bit of background before my question, just because it's a little confusing (at least to me).
I have an environment with 4 AD sites (Alpha, Beta, Charlie, and Delta) We had, at one time, three separate ConfigMgr 2007 instances (one for each site and none for the remaining one) and it was in general a very bad thing. It was decided that
we should stand up a single, centralized ConfigMgr 2012 R2 instance and stop duplicating effort, wasting time, and spending money where we don't need to. Great! Everyone was on board except for Delta, who had political objections. We have
boundaries set based on AD Site names in the central ConfigMgr environment and everything has been humming along well for the past ~2 years.
One of the larger groups in the Delta domain have decided that they want in to the central ConfigMgr environment and want to know if it's possible. This is good for us (more business!) but bad because I'm not sure if it can happen.
Because of Political Reasons Delta's rogue ConfigMgr environment isn't going anywhere, so adding a boundary based on AD site is not an option.
Further, because of their network's complexity all of their machines share a number of very large DHCP ranges...so there is no way to draw a dividing line between a machine that should be managed by CM2012 vs CM2007. Also, politically, that is not
likely to change.
The only thing separating these machines from others are OU membership, which unfortunately can't be used to create boundaries.
I'd love to just throw their ranges into our SCCM, create collections based on their OU membership, and have them set their SCCM site information via group policy to point to ours--but it can't be that easy can it? I'm at a loss to determine if what
they want to have happen is even possible, so that's why I'm posting here and hoping that someone might be able to point me in the right direction. Thank you in advance for your help.

Thanks for the reply, Torsten.
Just create content location boundary groups only in CM12. Don't touch the CM07 ones.
Auto assignment is only needed when using either client push (using SMSSITECODE=AUTO. Workaround: use SMSSITECODE=ABC) or running ccmsetup.exe manually without providing the sitecode.
Torsten Meringer |
Okay, I'm completely on board here. Does any of this information change if they were to upgrade to CM2012 in their environment as well or is the information just a ConfigMgr rule of thumb?

Self-Assigned IP error and no Internet thru cable, but fine via Airport crd

I am having a vert weird problem. Airport base station hooked to a LAN router, new Mac Pro (10.5.1) hooked via cable to Airport base station. I get the self-assigned IP address and no internet. This happens also if I hook Mac Pro directly to router via cable. Oddly enough, during all of this, my iBook connects fine to the Internet, thru the base station using its Airport card. What gives, I may throw in the towel and go out and by an Airport card for my Mac Pro to get Internet connectivity, even though it sits only 6 inches from the base station. Also not, my Power Mac G4 was hooked via cable to the Airport and worked just fine...
If someone discovers a fix, please feel free to email.
Thanks,
Bob A.

Funny you should mention that. This weekend I noticed that I can get an IP address and internet connection, either via the Ethernet cable from my AEBS or wirelessly from the AEBS on my laptop, but only one at a time and it depends which computer (iBook or Mac Pro) is on when the AEBS is toggled on/off. The only exception is my iPod touch, which can get an internet connection no matter which is the Internet connected machine(how's that for bizzare ?).
So, it appears the Linksys router that is hooked to our building's LAN is not distributing IP addresses (disconnecting the router and connecting the AEBS directly to the LAN produces the identical single IP address situation). Since using my Mac Pro with Leopard, I can only set up the AEBS in bridge mode, putting it in the DHCP mode causes the AEBS to be undetecable by the Mac Pro (haven't checked if the iBook sees it).
So I guess the questions are now:
- Shouldn't my router be assigning IP addresses from the LAN, isn't that it's job? Should I try buying a new one since I can't get AEBS to DHCP?
- Why would my iPod touch me immune from the single IP address situation?
- Any idea how to get Leopard to allow my AEBS to use DHCP?
Now I say I can't use DHCP, I mean that if I reset the AEBS, start from scratch and use assisted setup with Airport Admin Utility, and select DHCP at the place where you select Bridge or DHCP mode (or whatever the DHCP mode is called, I forget)the AEBS disappears. If I set bridge mode and then dicker around with DHCP manually, it doesn't disappear, but then it just won't give an IP address to any computer til re-rest and put back in old plain Bridge mode.
I would prefer to run the LAN right into AEBS and have it act as router and all that. I would also be fine with having a router and letting AEBS just bridge, just as long as I can connect to the Internet on more than one computer at a time.
I think I have a basic knowledge of what's going on, although my use of proper terminology is lacking, so feel free to follow up with any questions, I'd be happy to clarify.
This Leopard Mac Pro replaced a PowerMac G4 with Tiger and this all worked fine with it. When I traded computers and didn't get Internet I reset and re-setup the base station, so this might all be a Leopard problem
Of course, it brings me back to shouldn't the router hooked to my building's LAN be distributing IP addresses?
Thank you in advance for your help on this isssue.
Bob A.

Fluid grid layout lost when closing and reopening Dreamweaver

I am working on fluid grid layout in dreamweaver cc. I created a new dreamweaver site, created a fluid grid layout page and everything looked and worked as it should. I closed out of dreamweaver and when I reopened it, I could no longer see the fluid grid layout or the fluid grid handles on any of the divs. I also no longer had the little button in the toolbar next to the live button either, to toggle the fluid layout on and off. I did not move the css or js from where dreamweaver originally stored them.
Also checked the content and code of my files, everything looks as it should:
The fluid grid layout style sheet IS attached to the page.
The Fluid Grid Properties near the top of the style sheet ARE still there.
I have tried several test sites and as soon as I close DW and reopen it, the fluid grid layout button is gone, as is are the visual aids. I uninstalled and reinstalled dreamweaver to no avail.
Very frustrating!
ANY help would be greatly appreciated!

Hi,
Thank you for all the responses. When I was doing the testing, I didn't touch any of the style sheets. I just created a new site, created a new FGL page, saved everything, then closed out. When I reopened, the FGL elements were not there. So in taking Ken's suggestion, I was getting ready to upload the files to see if anyone could see what I was doing wrong. I had named the file test.html so I did a 'save as', to save it as index.html to make it easier. Then a strange thing happened. The new 'index.html' page came in with the FGL elements! When I looked at the test.html, they still were not there. In doing additional testing, when I open the first file, whether test.html or index.html, no FGL functions are available, when I open the second one, again no matter whether test.html or index.html, they are. Getting ready to throw my hands up... I uploaded everything to:
http://www.ComputerSecurity.com/fgltest/
Directly under there is the css file called fgltest.css, along with the boilerplate.css, respond.min.js, index,html, and test.html.
Don't know what is going on. I am new to fluid grid layouts, but not to dreamweaver, have been using it for years. Unless someone can see something that I cannot, seems like the only way I can create a Fluid grid layout based on this new information, is to open one page and work on another...

Differences between Publishing sites and publishing enabled document library

Hi
what is the main differences between Publishing sites and publishing enabled document library
and how to enable publishing for document library?
adil

Publishing Sites is an out-of-the-box site template designed to publish web pages and it comes with a pre-built workflow or without (depends on which template you pick). It comes with libraries such as Pages library, Publishing Images, or Site Images.
It is configured to fully customized the master pages (or add new ones), and page layouts.
There is no such thing as publishing enabled document library. A document library is not designed to publish web pages. You can have Site Pages library in a team site, but if you are looking to fully brand a site collection, then this is not your answer.
You will need to use a Publishing Site to fully brand your Internet or Intranet site.
You can enable the publishing infrastructure on any site that is NOT a publishing site, but this does not turn your provisioned site to a publishing site. It simply turns on publishing features, such as navigation management, master pages/page layouts management,
publishing workflows, etc....

How to float a landing page to capture email address, only shown once per visitor to the site, and not on return visits?

I would like to float a landing page to capture email addresses, that is only shown once per visitor to the site, and not on return visits OR after they submit their email not to be asked again.
thanks guys!

Hi Scott,
Thanks a lot for the advice.
Actually I added user names to the apex_access_control table and assigned each user the desired privilege but did not notice that I should do the following setting.
*Access Control Administration > [RUN] > Set Application Mode: Restricted access.*
Thanks,
Guy

Create layout for Team Site

I created simple html file. I opened SPD 2013 and put this file into the All Files/_catalog/masterpage folder.
I opened Design Manager and convert it to a SharePoint master page. Conversion was successful.
In the Design Manager I clicked Edit Page Layouts and created new layout.
The Enterprise Wiki Page Content Type was selected.
I have SharePoint 2013 Team Site.
I published master page and page layout from Master pages and page layouts Gallery.
In the Look and Feel I selected Master page then set my created master page as default.
The master page of Team site was changed to my newly created master page.
I edited the page and clicked Text Layout. There was not my layout in the drop down .
How to create layout for Team site?
I would be very grateful for any help.
bnossov

Hi,
Please check whether enable the SharePoint Server Publishing Infrastructure(Site Collection Feature) feature.
Or check the steps as the links below.
How to: Create a page layout in SharePoint 2013
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/jj822368.aspx
http://blogs.technet.com/b/tothesharepoint/archive/2013/04/10/stage-7-upload-page-layouts-and-create-new-pages-in-a-publishing-site.aspx
Thanks,
Dennis Guo
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help and unmark them if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Subscriber Support, contact
[email protected]
Dennis Guo
TechNet Community Support

Re-assignment of Site

Hi,
I need to know the basic functionality or the background process for re-assigning the site.
I have one primary server (Site code- AAA) for which the boundary has been defined as all of the clients will get the side code from this primary server. (e.g. 172.168.1.0 - 172.168.1.254 (Network A), 192.168.1.1 - 192.168.1.254(Network B)). Now Clients
in both the network get assigned with the site code AAA. Client has been pushed to all the machines and the clients has detected the site AAA.
Now I have created another primary Server (Site code-BBB) and modified the boundary so that the clients in network B will get the site code BBB.
I deployed the client to the machines in Network B. Machine B has detected the newer site BBB but i found a strange thing. The machines are still having the MP of Primary server 1 (Site Code-AAA) as the Resident Management Point where as BBB is the assigned
Management Point.
Now it has not made any changes or created any issues. all of my packages are still getting downloaded from the distribution point of my second Primary Server (Site code-BBB). But I have few queries :-
1) My machine has the same IP address before and after site Re-assignment. So where does the Resident Distribution Point (Primary Server 1)comes up into act. As far as I am concerned it is for roaming profile when a machine roams over to another network
and another site. But my machine is in the very same network but we have re-defined the boundary to work with another primary server.
2) We have uninstalled the client and then re-install it from primary server 2 but still it is picking up the resident MP as the Primary Server 1. Why it is so. Is it expected ot I did something terribly wrong.
3) Same IP before and after re-assignment of another site (from AAA to BBB). Will the machine be treated as a roaming profile.
Gaurav Ranjan

Hi,
" but still it is picking up the resident MP as the Primary Server 1"
I think this might be related to the boundary. Because if a client is in the boundary of one site, then the resident MP is the MP installed on that site.
For more information:
How Configuration Manager Boundaries affects Distribution Point Selection
Best Regards,
Joyce Li
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

"ethernet has a self assigned IP address and will not connect to the internet" - how do i fix this?

A message saying "ethernet has a self assigned IP address and will not connect to the internet" comes up whenever I plug the cable in. Everyone's computers work except for mine work in the house and I have tried different cords and connecting sites.
Please help

Open System Preferences/Network
Select the Location you use at home
You may need to click the Padlock bottom left at this point if it's locked, enter the admin password to unlock
In the left hand column drag the Ethernet connection to the top of the list and remove any you don't use
Click the Advanced button bottom right
Click the TCP/IP Tab
Set Configure IPv4 to Using DHCP
Click OK bottom right and you should see the Router IP number appear and a unique but similar one for your Mac
Click Ok then click Apply and close the Panel

Restoring permissions to a site and document libraries

We have SharePoint sites (SPWeb) with unique permissions (permissions inheritance broken). Each site has several document libraries in it. The document libraries also have their permissions inheritance broken. Users are assigned to
a custom permissions level at the document library level and at the same time they are given Limited Access permission level at the site level. Apparently, one of the document libraries was still inheriting permissions. A customer with site
admin rights was trying to remove some user permissions for the document library that was still inheriting permissions. Because the permissions were still being inherited, they were taken to the parent site permissions page. They selected most
of the accounts and clicked Remove. They thought they were removing permissions for that document library but instead they removed permissions at the site level which means that they removed permissions to all document libraries for these accounts.
My question is: I have a content database backup from last night. I also have a full farm backup (done via Central Admin) from a month or two ago. Is there any way to restore those permissions ( to the site and document libraries) from one
of these backups? I cannot restore the whole site collection because the other sites in this site collection are not affected by this. I can only restore an SPWeb object. However, is my understanding correct that restoring the SPWeb is only
going to restore the content and not the permissions? Is there any other way to restore users permissions at the site and document library level from the two backups I have?
thanks,

I do not think its possible to restore permissions only.
You have to restore another site from backup and then map user permissions in all document libraries. If possible then develop a custom control which will check user permission on restored site and apply it on the production site.
Adnan Amin MCT, SharePoint Architect | If you find this post useful kindly please mark it as an answer :)

Hi Guys, I am using the full width video widget on a site. The widget was working perfectly however I have just added additional content to the site and re-uploaded and now the video is not working! Please help I have tried everything and am freaking out

Hi Guys,
I am using the full width video widget on a site. The widget was working perfectly however I have just added additional content to the site and re-uploaded and now the video is not working! Please help I have tried everything and am freaking out as this web-site has been payed for by my client.
Alex

Many thanks.
With those symptoms, I'd try the following document:
Apple software on Windows: May see performance issues and blank iTunes Store
(If there's a SpeedBit LSP showing up in Autoruns, it's usually best to just uninstall your SpeedBit Video Accelerator.)

Logical systems assignment when SRM and ECC are on 2 different servers

Hi SRM guru's,
What is the standard practice for Logical system creation and assignment when ECC and SRM are on 2 different servers.
I could not able to find which i created a logical system in SRM server which i created in ECC
Same for the ECC also.
how do i assign logical system of SRM to ECC
vice versa.
your prompt response is appreciated.
Regards

Hi Sai,
Logical System Naming/Creation procedure is not dependent on the servers but it is just a logical representation of a system.
As you are trying to name logical systems for ECC & SRM, please follow the below procedure which is usually recommeded by SAP and followed.
Logical System : <SID>CLNT<Client Number>
For Example if you have a client 300 in system DE0 (also called SID), the logical system name will be DE0CLNT300. And it will be same for SRM system.
You can refer the below document which eplains the creation of logical system and RFC destinations etc
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/CABFAALEQS/CABFAALEQS.pdf
Note: Only while configuring the RFC Destination, the servers will play a crucial role.
Regards
Kathirvel

What's the difference between a web site and a web application?

I'm stumped trying to come up to a difference between a web site and a web application for myself. As I see it, a web site points to a specific page and a web application is more of some sort of 'portal' to content and information.
But where I'm stuck is that a web application is still viewed through a browser (is it not?) and a web site can still view content dynamically, making the line between web site and application prety gray.
For instance, does a web site using ASP.NET or AJAX (I assume ASP.NET is AJAX's proprietary sibling, if not, ignore ASP.NET AND concentrate on the AJAX), becomes a web application because it can retrieve data dynamically and asynchronously or would a website
using PHP and a CMS be more of a web application because it forms the pages on request, based on the request of the client and its content in its databse?
Or maybe I'm totally wrong here - what differenciates between a web application and a website?
http://support.peopleperhour.com/entries/68630566--C-mon-lets-Watch-The-Other-Woman-2014-full-movie-online-free
https://glossicom.zendesk.com/entries/68643806--%D0%BC-v%C9%AA%C9%9Bc-%C3%A4st-Watch-The-Lucy-2014-full-movie-free
https://cloudhance.zendesk.com/entries/68115098--%D0%BC-v%C9%AA%C9%9Bc-%C3%A4st-Watch-The-Lucy-2014-full-movie-free
This is totally personal and subjective, but I'd say that a website is defined by its content, while a webapplication is
defined by its interaction with the user. That is, a website can plausibly consist of a static content repository that's dealt out to all visitors, while a web application depends on interaction and requires programmatic user input and data processing.
For example, a news site would be a "website", but a spreadsheet or a collaborative calendar would be web "applications". The news site shows essentially the same information to all visitors, while the calendar processes individual data.
Practically, most websites with quickly changing content will also rely on a sophisticated programmatic (and/or database) backend, but at least in principle they're only defined by their output. The web application on the other hand is essentially a program that
runs remotely, and it depends fundamentally on a processing and a data storage backend.
http://support.peopleperhour.com/entries/68125597--%D0%BC-v%C9%AA%C9%9Bc-%C3%A4st-Watch-The-Lucy-2014-full-movie-free
https://cloudhance.zendesk.com/entries/67541393--Watch-The-Godzilla-2014-free-Online-Full-Movie-HD-Quality
http://support.peopleperhour.com/entries/68168787--Watch-The-Godzilla-2014-free-Online-Full-Movie-HD-Quality
https://glossicom.zendesk.com/entries/68161538--Watch-The-Godzilla-2014-free-Online-Full-Movie-HD-Quality
There is no real "difference". Web site is a more anachronistic term that exists from the early days of
the internet where the notion of a dynamic application that can respond to user input was much more limited and much less common. Commercial websites started out largely as interactive brochures (with the notable exception of hotel/airline reservation sites).
Over time their functionality (and the supporting technologies) became more and more responsive and the line between an application that you install on your computer and one that exists in the cloud became more and more blurred.
If you're just looking to express yourself clearly when speaking about what you're building, I would continue to describe something that is an interactive brochure or business card as a "web site" and something that actually *does something that feels
more like an application as a web app.
The most basic distinction would be if a website has a supporting database that stores user data and modifies what the user sees based on some user specified criteria, then it's probably an app of some sort (although I would be reluctant to describe Amazon.com
as a web app, even though it has a lot of very user-specific functionality). If, on the other hand, it is mostly static .html files that link to one another, I would call that a web site.
Most often, these days, a web app will have a large portion of its functionality written in something that runs on the client (doing much of the processing in either javascript or actionscript, depending on how its implemented) and reaches back through some
http process to the server for supporting data. The user doesn't move from page to page as much and experiences whatever they're going to experience on a single "page" that creates the app experience for them.

...can i make as many iweb websites as i want? ...and as many blogs as i want? ...i have never made one before....
....although, i do have my own small business and i do have a website that i paid a guy to make and also host....(which is a waste of $$$$ in my opinion as i think i can do a better job making one myself through iweb) ....
...anyways, i know it is splitting hairs but what exactly is the diff b/w a blog and a website ....i am under the impression that a blog is just a personal newsletter sort of thing,...?

HT4098 How do I unsubscribe from subscription VIP in the game StarMaker? every week, I removed 66 rubles, while I'm there not even sit, and how do I unsubscribe don't know, please help

How do I unsubscribe from subscription VIP in the game StarMaker? every week, I removed 66 rubles, while I'm there not even sit, and how do I unsubscribe don't know, please help

Contact the maker of the app. Apple has nothing to do with subscriptions to third party apps.

Layout assignment to sites and assortments

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for