LDAP - searching cached data

Hi folks.
I need to modify an existing application to integrate with an LDAP server. One of the things my code needs to do is search LDAP entries, using a search filter. For example:
NamingEnumeration<SearchResult> results =
ldapContext.search(LdapName,
"(|(objectClass=group)",
null);
This works just fine. My problem is that we can't afford to hit the LDAP server every time this search needs to be run - it takes too long to get the results. So, we will periodically request all LDAP entries, and cache them locally.
My code then needs to search the cached data, just as it would if it were making a request of the LDAP server. Ideally, I'd like to be able to use the same filter syntax as above when searching the local data.
Is there a way to search locally cached data? Essentially, I want to run the search specified above, but instead of pointing the code at an LDAP server, I want to point it at locally cached data.
Thanks!

Similar Messages

Caching data for future searches?

Hi folks.
I need to modify an existing application to integrate with an LDAP server. One of the things my code needs to do is search LDAP entries, using a search filter. For example:
NamingEnumeration<SearchResult> results =
ldapContext.search(LdapName,
"(|(objectClass=group)",
null);
This works just fine. My problem is that we can't afford to hit the LDAP server every time this search needs to be run - it takes too long to get the results. So, we will periodically request all LDAP entries, and cache them locally.
My code then needs to search the cached data, just as it would if it were making a request of the LDAP server. Ideally, I'd like to be able to use the same filter syntax as above when searching the local data.
Is there a way to search locally cached data? Essentially, I want to run the search specified above, but instead of pointing the code at an LDAP server, I want to point it at locally cached data.
Thanks!

Hi,
If you require product locations only for forecasting I guess you will require only products and locations to be define in APO. I would suggest that you can create a seperate Model for this product locations which is not their in ECC and do the forecasting if it satisfies your business requirement, the reason being once you create master data directly in APO it will not be possible to CIF the master data fom ECC which will create inconsistency.
You can use LSMW also to upload product and location if you are not defining comples parameters like Time phase cost in Product location & their are not many validation which I assume will be the case.
Thanks,
Sanjog

Open Directory, third party LDAP search path problem on Snow Leopard

Happy new year folks,
I ran into an interesting problem this past week in regards to a third party LDAP directory in the Search path (which used to work on previous versions). The issue brings the server to its knees eventually. I'm still digging through the logs, but here's the general breakdown...
1. Add third-party LDAP to the OD node list. This has always worked on previous versions, and appears to still work at the most basic level. I can navigate the node with DSCL, read records, etc.
1. Add third-party LDAP to the OD search path.
2. Wait a few minutes....
3. The server begins to slow down. Apache, SSH, ServerAdmin service stop responding. I'm able to run "top" briefly, which shows an increase of threads.
4. Restart the server and quickly remove the directory from the OD search path
5. Server goes back to being rock solid with very nice response times for Apache, SSH, ServerAdmin, etc.
If anyone has any debugging suggestions, or has seen this before, let me know.
Jaime
--- Below is some console output leading up to the chaos. Before adding to search path, everything looks good --------------------
bash-3.2# dscl
Entering interactive mode... (type "help" for commands)
read /LDAPv3/ldap.itd.umich.edu/Users/jaimelm cn
dsAttrTypeNative:cn:
Jaime Magiera
Jaime L Magiera 1
Jaime L Magiera
--- Add to Search Path, which hangs ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
bash-3.2# dscl /Search -append / CSPSearchPath /LDAPv3/ldap.itd.umich.edu
--- DSCL in debug mode contains the following ----------------------------------------------
2010-01-01 19:26:25 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: ipfw, PID: 1097, API: libinfo, Server Used : libinfomig DAR : Procedure = getprotobynumber (13) : Result code = 0
2010-01-01 19:26:25 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: sso_util, PID: 1103, API: dsFindDirNodes(), Server Used : DAR : 1 : Dir Ref = 16779669 : Requested nodename = /Search
2010-01-01 19:26:25 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Plug-in call "dsDoPlugInCustomCall()" failed with error = -14292.
2010-01-01 19:26:25 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Port: 27151 Call: dsDoPlugInCustomCall() == -14292
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: dscl, PID: 1114, API: dsFindDirNodes(), Server Used : DAR : 1 : Dir Ref = 16779
707 : Requested nodename = /LDAPv3/ldap.itd.umich.edu
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: dscl, PID: 1114, API: dsFindDirNodes(), Server Used : DAR : 2 : Dir Ref = 16779707 : Result code = 0
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: dscl, PID: 1114, API: dsVerifyDirRefNum(), Server Used : DAC : Dir Ref 167797072010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: dscl, PID: 1114, API: dsVerifyDirRefNum(), Server Used : DAR : Dir Ref 16779707
: Result code = 0
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: dscl, PID: 1114, API: dsFindDirNodes(), Server Used : DAC : Dir Ref 16779707 :
Data buffer size = 1282010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: dscl, PID: 1114, API: dsFindDirNodes(), Server Used : DAR : 1 : Dir Ref = 16779
707 : Requested nodename = ConfigNode2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: dscl, PID: 1114, API: dsFindDirNodes(), Server Used : DAR : 2 : Dir Ref = 16779
707 : Result code = 0
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: Requesting dsOpenDirNode with PID = 1114, UID = 0, and EUID = 0
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: dscl, PID: 1114, API: dsOpenDirNode(), Configure Used : DAC : Dir Ref = 16779707 : Node Name = /Configure
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: dscl, PID: 1114, API: dsOpenDirNode(), Configure Used : DAR : Dir Ref = 1677970
7 : Node Ref = 33556926 : Result code = 0
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: dscl, PID: 1114, API: dsVerifyDirRefNum(), Server Used : DAC : Dir Ref 16779707
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: dscl, PID: 1114, API: dsVerifyDirRefNum(), Server Used : DAR : Dir Ref 16779707 : Result code = 0
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: dscl, PID: 1114, API: dsGetDirNodeInfo(), Configure Used : DAC : Node Ref = 33556926 : Requested Attrs = dsAttrTypeStandard:OperatingSystemVersion : Attr Type Only Flag = 0
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: dscl, PID: 1114, API: dsGetDirNodeInfo(), Configure Used : DAR : Node Ref = 33556926 : Result code = 0
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: dscl, PID: 1114, API: dsGetDirNodeInfo(), Search Used : DAC : Node Ref = 33556924 : Requested Attrs = dsAttrTypeStandard:LSPSearchPath : Attr Type Only Flag = 0
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: dscl, PID: 1114, API: dsGetDirNodeInfo(), Search Used : DAR : Node Ref = 33556924 : Result code = 0
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Client: dscl, PID: 1114, API: dsDoPlugInCustomCall(), Search Used : DAC : Node Ref = 33556924 : Request Code = 444
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Checking for Search Node XML config file:
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - /Library/Preferences/DirectoryService/SearchNodeConfig.plist
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Have written the Search Node XML config file:
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - /Library/Preferences/DirectoryService/SearchNodeConfigBackup.plist
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - Setting search policy to Custom search
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - CSearchPlugin::SwitchSearchPolicy: switch - reachability of node </LDAPv3/127.0.0.1> retained as <true>
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x000000010070A000] - CSearchPlugin::CheckNodes: checking network node reachability on search policy 0x0000000000002201
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x00000001037A5000] - CCachePlugin::EmptyCacheEntryType - Request to empty all types - Flushing the cache
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x000000010070A000] - Client: Requesting dsOpenDirNode with PID = 0, UID = 0, and EUID = 0
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x000000010070A000] - Internal Dispatch, API: dsOpenDirNode(), LDAPv3 Used : DAC : Dir Ref = 16777216 : Node Name = /LDAPv3/127.0.0.1
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x000000010070A000] - Internal Dispatch, API: dsOpenDirNode(), LDAPv3 Used : DAR : Dir Ref = 16777216 : Node Ref = 33556929 : Result code = 0
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x000000010070A000] - CSearchPlugin::CheckNodes: calling dsOpenDirNode succeeded on node </LDAPv3/127.0.0.1>
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x000000010070A000] - Internal Dispatch, API: dsCloseDirNode(), LDAPv3 Used : DAC : Node Ref = 33556929
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x000000010070A000] - Internal Dispatch, API: dsCloseDirNode(), LDAPv3 Used : DAR : Node Ref = 33556929 : Result code = 0
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x0000000103181000] - mbr_mig - dsFlushMembershipCache - force cache flush (internally initiated)
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x000000010070A000] - Client: Requesting dsOpenDirNode with PID = 0, UID = 0, and EUID = 0
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x0000000103181000] - Membership - dsNodeStateChangeOccurred - flagging all entries as expired
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x000000010070A000] - Internal Dispatch, API: dsOpenDirNode(), LDAPv3 Used : DAC : Dir Ref = 16777216 : Node Name = /LDAPv3/ldap.itd.umich.edu
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x000000010070A000] - CLDAPNodeConfig::InternalEstablishConnection - Node ldap.itd.umich.edu - Connection requested for read
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x000000010070A000] - CLDAPNodeConfig::FindSuitableReplica - Node ldap.itd.umich.edu - Attempting Replica connect to 141.211.93.133 for read
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x0000000102481000] - CCachePlugin::SearchPolicyChange - search policy change notification, looking for NIS
2010-01-01 19:26:36 EST - T[0x0000000102481000] - Internal Dispatch, API: dsGetDirNodeInfo(), Search Used : DAC : Node Ref = 33554436 : Requested Attrs = dsAttrTypeStandard:SearchPath : Attr Type Only Flag = 0
------- From another screen, I do "id jaimelm", which hangs ------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Requested Rec Names = jaimelm : Rec Name Pattern Match:8449 = eDSiExact : Requested Rec Types = dsRecTypeStandard:Users
2010-01-01 19:36:55 EST - T[0x00000001082A2000] - Internal Dispatch, API: dsGetRecordList(), Search Used : DAC : 2 : Node Ref = 33554436 : Requested Attrs = dsAttrTypeStandard:AppleMetaNodeLocation;dsAttrTypeStandard:RecordName;dsAttrTy peStandard:Password;dsAttrTypeStandard:UniqueID;dsAttrTypeStandard:GeneratedUID; dsAttrTypeStandard:PrimaryGroupID;dsAttrTypeStandard:NFSHomeDirectory;dsAttrType Standard:UserShell;dsAttrTypeStandard:RealName;dsAttrTypeStandard:Keywords : Attr Type Only Flag = 0 : Record Count Limit = 1 : Continue Data = 0
2010-01-01 19:37:03 EST - T[0x0000000108325000] - Client: httpd, PID: 157, API: mbr_syscall, Server Used : process kauth result 0x0000000102022B30
2010-01-01 19:37:03 EST - T[0x00000001083A8000] - Client: httpd, PID: 151, API: mbr_syscall, Server Used : process kauth result 0x0000000102022C50
2010-01-01 19:37:05 EST - T[0x000000010842B000] - Client: httpd, PID: 203, API: mbr_syscall, Server Used : process kauth result 0x0000000102022D70
2010-01-01 19:37:15 EST - T[0x00000001084AE000] - Client: httpd, PID: 994, API: mbr_syscall, Server Used : process kauth result 0x0000000102023890
2010-01-01 19:37:26 EST - T[0x0000000108531000] - Client: httpd, PID: 198, API: mbr_syscall, Server Used : process kauth result 0x0000000102023980
2010-01-01 19:37:31 EST - T[0x00000001085B4000] - Client: httpd, PID: 161, API: mbr_syscall, Server Used : process kauth result 0x0000000~

Hi
I'm in agreement with harry here but what I'm struggling to understand is why you are seeing this as a problem? I'm also struggling to see this as being a possibility in a single server environment if I understand your post correctly?
Promotion to OD Master with all that entails absolutely rests on a properly configured and tested internal DNS Service. The Kerberos Realm's foundation (and with that the ability of the server to perform its function as KDC and offer LDAP services) entirely depends on what is configured in the DNS Service. This will include the server name, domain name and tld. The Kerberos Realm automatically configures itself using that information. Likewise the searchbase.
Its more than possible to change the Realm name and with it the LDAP search base (in certain circumstances) and have an OD Master, however Kerberos won't start it won't need to as the KDC will be elsewhere. You generally see this when augmenting Windows AD with MCX. In that situation Realm name and search base will reflect what is set on the Active Directory. Client computers will use what is set there for contact and authentication information before looking at the OD Master for anything else.
Does this help? Tony

Ldap search query takes more than 10 seconds

LDAP query takes more than 10 seconds to execute.
For validating the policy configured, the Acess Manager(Sun Java System Access Manager) contacts the LDAP (Sun Java System Directory Server 6.2) to get the users in a dynamic group. The time out value configured in Access Manager for LDAP searches is 10 seconds.
Issue : The ldap query takes more than 10 seconds to execute at some times .
The query is executing with less than 10 seconds in most of the cases, but it takes more than 10 seconds in some cases. The total number of users available in the ldap is less than 1500.
7 etime =1
6 etime =1
102 etime=4
51 etime=5
26 etime=6
5 etime=7
4 etime=8
From the ldap access logs we can see the following entry,some times the query takes more than 10 seconds,
[28/May/2012:14:21:26 +0200] conn=281 op=41433 msgId=853995 - SRCH base="dc=****,dc=****,dc=com" scope=2 filter="(&(&(***=true)(**=true))(objectClass=vfperson))" attrs=ALL
[28/May/2012:14:21:36 +0200] conn=281 op=41434 msgId=854001 - ABANDON targetop=41433 msgid=853995 nentries=884 etime=10
The query was aborted by the access manger after 10 seconds.
Please post your suggestions to resolve this issue .
1.How we can find out , why the query is taking more than 10 seconds ?
2.Next steps to resolve this issue .

Hi Marco,
Thanks for your suggestions.
Sorry for replying late. I was out of office for few weeks.
1) Have you already tuned the caches? (entry cache, db cache, filesystem cache?)
We are using db cache and we have not done any turning for cache. The application was working fine and there was no much changes in the number of users .
2) Unfortunately we don't have direct access to the environment and we have contacted the responsible team to verify the server health during the issue .
Regarding the IO operations we can see that, load balancer is pinging the ldap sever every 15 seconds to check the status of ldap servers which yields a new connection on every hit. (on average per minute 8 connections - )
3) We using cn=dsameuser to bind the directory server. Other configuration details for ldap
LDAP Connection Pool Minimum Size: 1
LDAP Connection Pool Maximum Size:10
Maximum Results Returned from Search: 1700
Search Timeout: 10
Is the Search Timeout value configured is proper ? ( We have less than 1500 user in the ldap server).
Also is there any impact if the value Maximum Results Returned from Search = set to 1700. ( The Sun document for AM says that the ideal value for this is 1000 and if its higher than this it will impact performance.
The application was running without time out issue for last 2 years and there was no much increase in the number of users in the system. ( at the max 200 users added to the system in last 2 years.)
Thanks,
Jay

Adobe Reader is Cacheing Data From OLEDB Connection

I am trying to pre-populate a form from an oledb connection to an access database. I have an html page where a user can search an id. This id then gets written to a table where the sql query defined in the PDF form can grab it, join it with a table where the user info is stored, then display it.
My problem is that Adobe Reader seems to be caching data from the first SQL select query that is executed. When I change the id I am loading, I still get data from the first SQL query in Reader. If I open the PDF via Acrobat, the data loads up properly, and it doesn't seem to be cached. I have looked at the following forum for suggestions: http://www.adobeforums.com/webx/.3bc3549c, but their suggestions haven't worked.
I have tried turning off caching anywhere I can find it (i.e. in LiveCycle, Adobe Reader), but nothing is working. Does anybody have any suggestions?

It sounds like you need use the adobe schema in MII so the output of your transaction matches it.
Regards,
Jamie

Search for data in server based database.

I have a web page (http://gosolivitahomes.com) where I can enter a search for data in my server based database. If I enter a value less than $100,000 in Min Price I get no response. For values >= $100,000 I get the correct response. Why? Please help.

Yesterday I got no properties under $100,000.
To day I tried again and the first time I got 2 results, but when I went back and repeated the same thing, I got no result.
Then, like John Waller suggested, I cleared my cache and the 2 result were back.
Perhaps your problem is a template or other cms cache issue. I don't know very much about it, but when I had a login problem I had to disable user cache i the cms (Joomla).
I hope you will solve the problem

Change LDAP Search Base: Is archive/recreate required?

This is the gist of the message that I'm getting while searching for an answer, but I wanted to ask it here just in case.
I have a MacOS X server (10.4.9) that I need to join to an Active Directory... it was originally on it's own domain (xserve.mydomain.ca) and will now be on the corporate domain (xserve.myorg.ca).
I've run changeip to change the IP address and switch over all the domain information. The forward and reverse lookups are happy and working and while I had to recreate home directories for some users, in the end, everything worked fairly well.
Now I need to take the next step in the integration and get LDAP changed over to reflect the new FQDN. It is current dc=xserve, dc=mydomain, dc=ca ... so it needs to be dc=xserve, dc=myorg, dc=ca
Is archiving the LDAP database... switching to Standalone... and recreating the OD Master with new LDAP search base the only way to make the change?
And if so... does it actually work? (Home Directories don't matter too much.. but recereating 200 users, obviously would suck).
Thank you very much.
Chris Alemany
Computer Technician
Malaspina U-C
Nanaimo, BC

I'm hoping for a little detail here.
The LDAP archive that is created through Server Admin
is... comprehensive... ie. there are a LOT of
different files in there.
Of course as it isn't only a LDAP archive but contains the PasswordServer database, the kerberos database, server settings ...
Where do I start in terms of "mangling" the data
(which I assume means redoing all references to the
old LDAP domain?
You would need to export only the LDAP database via the appropiate ldapsearch command.
As you begin to see this task is quite complex and without some decent knowledge about Mac OS X Server in general and specifically LDAP this task is doomed to fail. :o/
You can start your way with this book:
http://www.amazon.com/Apple-Training-System-Administration-Reference/dp/03213698 4X/ref=pdbbs_sr1/103-1936572-6371849?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1177352316&sr=8-1
Sorry for the bad news,
-Ralph

Some music files do not show up in google play music app library. I did clear cache/data and restarted phone. The music is stored on the SD card. Most of the music in the library is in the same folder on the sd card. I can play the song from file mana

some music files do not show up in google play music app library. I did clear cache/data and restarted phone. The music is stored on the SD card. Most of the music in the library is in the same folder on the sd card. I can play the song from file manager, but it still is not in the music library in play music.

Cyndi6858, help is here! We'd be happy to help figure this out. Just to be sure though, the Droid Maxx should not have an SD card. Is this the Droid Razr Maxx? How did you add the music to the device? Are you able to see the files and folders located on the SD card or device when plugged in?
Thanks,
MichelleH_VZW
Follow us on Twitter @VZWSupport

LDAP Search filter Jabber for Android

Hi,
I have this LDAP Filter which only shows me active users:
<BaseFilter>(&(objectclass=user)(objectcategory=person)(!UserAccountControl:1.2.840.113556.1.4.803:=2))</BaseFilter>
I have the same line for Jabber for Android, but it doesn't work.
<BDIBaseFilter>(&(objectclass=user)(objectcategory=person)(!UserAccountControl:1.2.840.113556.1.4.803:=2))</BDIBaseFilter>
I get 0 results for any search on Jabber Andorid. When I delete the "BDI" Line for the filter all together, then I get correct results - with photos and everything.
I also tried a simple filter e.g:
<BDIBaseFilter>(!UserAccountControl:1.2.840.113556.1.4.803:=2))</BDIBaseFilter>
No search results either.
Any ideas how to get Filter for Android working?
Versions:
Jabber for Android: 10.6
CUCM: 9.1.2

I think I found the coresponding messages in the log:
csf.person.ldap: [LdapSearchQueryHandler.cpp(51)] [start] - reqId = 2
02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15645 D csf.person.ldap: [LdapDirectoryImpl.cpp(1482)] [sendSearchQuery] -
02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15477 I csf.person.xmpp: [XMPPPersonRecordSource.cpp(268)] [fetchContacts] - Entering.
02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15645 D csf.person.ldap: [LdapDirectoryImpl.cpp(1531)] [sendSearchQuery] - filter = (&(objectclass=user)(objectcategory=person)(!UserAccountControl:1.2.840.113556.1.4.803:=2)(|(sAMAccountName=at1sath))), baseDN=OU=Organization,DC=at,DC=customer,DC=net
02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15477 D services-dispatcher: [ServicesDispatcher.cpp(147)] [pumpNext] - pumpNext.executed (ContactsAdapter::LoadContactsFromSource)
02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15645 D csf.person.ldap: [LdapDirectoryImpl.cpp(1576)] [sendSearchQuery] - ldap search error. rc= -7 ,msg=Bad search filter
02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15645 D csf.person.ldap: [LdapDirectoryImpl.cpp(1675)] [notifyListenersSearchRequestCompleted] - errorCode=-7
02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15477 D services-dispatcher: [ServicesDispatcher.cpp(145)] [pumpNext] - pumpNext.executing (ContactsAdapter::LoadContactsFromSource)
02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15645 D csf.person.ldap: [LdapDirectoryImpl.cpp(1258)] [mapErrorNo] - Code = -7, Msg=Bad search filter
02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15645 D csf.person.ldap: [LdapSearchQueryHandler.cpp(84)] [onSearchRequestCompleted] - reqId = 1, errcode = 9
02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15645 D csf.person.ldap: [LdapDirectoryImpl.cpp(1531)] [sendSearchQuery] - filter = (&(objectclass=user)(objectcategory=person)(!UserAccountControl:1.2.840.113556.1.4.803:=2)(|(sAMAccountName=at1hafr))), baseDN=OU=Organization,DC=at,DC=customer,DC=net
02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15645 D csf.person.ldap: [LdapDirectoryImpl.cpp(1576)] [sendSearchQuery] - ldap search error. rc= -7 ,msg=Bad search filter
02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15645 D csf.person.ldap: [LdapDirectoryImpl.cpp(1675)] [notifyListenersSearchRequestCompleted] - errorCode=-7
02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15645 D csf.person.ldap: [LdapDirectoryImpl.cpp(1258)] [mapErrorNo] - Code = -7, Msg=Bad search filter
02-26 09:18:59.851 15477 15645 D csf.person.ldap: [LdapSearchQueryHandler.cpp(84)] [onSearchRequestCompleted] - reqId = 2, errcode = 9
The next question is now: Why is it a bad search filter? And what is the correct one? The same filter works on jabber for windows...
BR, Dave

Report Using A Stored Procedure Is Caching Data

Post Author: springerc69
CA Forum: Data Connectivity and SQL
I converted a report from a view that worked fine to a stored procedure to try and improve the performance of the report, but when I publish the report it seems to cache the data. When you change the parameters you use to call the report or simply run the report again with the original parameters the report doesn't run the sproc and just shows the cached data from the original request. If I right click on the report and select refresh (web based crystal report), it prompts for the parameters. I just close out the prompt window, report window and click on the link for the report again it returns the correct results based on the new parameters or a refresh based on the original parameters. I've checked the cache time setting and set it to 0, and if you close the Internet Explorer window that originally called the report, open IE back up and request the report it will return the appropriate data. I have also verify that the report is not setup to save data with report. This is on Crystal XI Server.

Post Author: synapsevampire
CA Forum: Data Connectivity and SQL
Which viewer are you using?
It might be that your IE settings are caching the report pages. because you're using an HTML viewer.
Try the Active-X viewer.
I've forgotten which icon it is that changes the viewer...it's under the preferences options, I think it's the one that looks like a hunk of cheese on the right upper side.
-k

Prevent multiple users from updating coherence cache data at the same time

Hi,
I have a web application which have a huge amount of data instead of storing the data in Http Session are storing it in coherence. Now multiple groups of users can use or update the same data in coherence. There are 100's of groups with several thousand users in each group. How do I prevent multiple users from updating the cache data. Here is the scenario. User logs-in checks in coherence if the data there and gets it from coherence and displays it on the ui if not get it from backend i.e. mainframe systems and store it in coherence before displaying it on the screen. Now some other user at the same time can also perform the same function and if don't find the data in coherence can get it from backend and start saving it in coherence while the other user is also in the process of saving or updating. How do I prevent this in coherence. As have to use the same key when storing in coherence because the same data is shared across users and don't want to keep multiple copies of the same data. Is there something coherence provides out-of-the-box or what is best approach to handle this scenario.
Thanks

Hi,
actually I believe, that if we are speaking about multiple users each with its own HttpSession, in case of two users accessing the same session attribute in their own session, the actually used cache keys will not be the same.
On the other hand, this is probably not what you would really like, you would possibly like to share that data among sessions.
You should probably consider using either read-through caching with the CacheLoader implementor doing the expensive data retrieval (if the data to be cached can be obtained outside of an HTTP container), or side caching with using Coherence locks or entry-processors for concurrency control on the data retrieval operations for the same key (take care of retries in this case).
Best regards,
Robert

How can I use LDAP searching from OSX Lion Server to Mozilla Thunderbird?

How can I use LDAP searching from OSX Lion Server to Mozilla Thunderbird? We have a super awesome contacts server that works great for our Mac users. About 30% of our company are on PCs, and I would like to use the Mozilla Thunderbird mail client for them. I see that in Thunderbird I can set up LDAP searching, and would like to have this feature point to our contacts server. I've tried several different settings, and looked all over the web, but could not find the proper way to configure this. Does anyone know if this can be done, or if not, would have a better suggestion? Thank you for your time!!

try double clicking keychain acces should launch and ask if you want to install login, system, System roots
A dialog box will launch asking where to install the cert since your configuring a vpn I would put the certificate it in system.

Hi I'm running Addressbook and cannot clear previous entry easily when searching my data base of around 5,000 contacts. I prefer to view in All contacts on a double page spread with details on the right page. Searching doesn't seem to work correctly i

Hi I'm running Addressbook and cannot clear previous entry easily when searching my data base of around 5,000 contacts.
I prefer to view in All contacts on a double page spread with details on the right page. Searching doesn't seem to work correctly in this view.
It's always the second search that is problematic.
I've tried typing over and all it seems to do is confine the search to the the entries that have come up for the previous search.
I've tried to use the x to clear the previous entry and then type the next search, same problem. The only way seems to be to move from "All Contacts" to "Groups". Then the searched name appears and I can return to All Contacts to see full details.
Surely three key press' are not the way it's supposed to work?
FYI
Processor 2.7 GHz Intel Core i7
Memory 8 GB 1333 MHz DDR3
Graphics Intel HD Graphics 3000 512 MB
Software Mac OS X Lion 10.7.3 (11D50d)
Address book Version 6.1 (1083)
MacBook Pro, Mac OS X (10.7.1), 8Mb RAM 2.7Ghz i7

AddressBook experts are here:
https://discussions.apple.com/community/mac_os/mac_os_x_v10.7_lion#/?tagSet=1386

Sun idm LDAP Search Filter, logical operations.

Hi
Can any body please give me the solution on LDAP Search Filter
I need to get all the users from a LDAP
Whose attribute1 contains any of the values like (abc, bbc)
OR
Whose attribute2 contains any of the values like (xyz, yxz)

we got the solution
(|(|(attr1=abc)(attr1=bbc))(|(attr2=xyz)(attr2=yxz)))
finally this worked.

EasyDMS - search by date range for characteristics of type date

Hi Folks,
I have a characteristic of type date in the additional data of a DMS document. If I enter the date (for example validity date) as 08/31/2009 and search using cv04n and give a date range for the characteristic (i.e. 01/01/2009 - 12/31/2009), the search result will bring up the document.
However, I cannot do this from the EasyDMS find function. I need to specify an exact date. This is not very helpful for user who need to find documents with a validity date between 01/01/2009 - 12/31/2009 for example. Is there a way users can search for date range in EasyDMS find function?
Thanks,
Lashan

To search a date range with EasyDMS Client you have to set the registry key
\HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\SAP\EasyDms\Generel\DateSearchPick to Value 0
Then you can use the input field like in SAP-Gui. (01.01.2009-31.01.2009)
If you set the value to 1 or the key is not defined you can only search for one specified date.
If you don't find this key on your PC create it as dword.
Maybe you must restart you PC for takeing effect.
Hope this will help you.
Regards Wolfgang

LDAP - searching cached data

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for