Less than operator misbehave

The values came from (string to number) pattern match and were misbehaving.
After tinkering with type casting and formats (didn't spend much time though), there was no change in wrong evaluation:
Message Edited by labview-programmer on 06-04-2010 10:19 PM
Message Edited by labview-programmer on 06-04-2010 10:21 PM
Best,
Aniket
Solved!
Go to Solution.
Attachments:
wrong evaluation.vi ‏6 KB

No it works. And this is common problem then working with floating point numbers :smileyvery-happy: The problem are caused by small rounding errors. The number format is the source of the trouble. It has been a lot of postings about this
Use the in range check instead.
Besides which, my opinion is that Express VIs Carthage must be destroyed deleted
(Sorry no Labview "brag list" so far)

Similar Messages

Using '(' and less than operator in an xsql page sql query

Dear All,
I tried to use left parenthesis '(' and less than operator in an sql query through an xsql page, it doesn't let to use them.
Do you know how to use those in an xsql page?
Thanks for your help.
Mustafa

Following is the xsql page that I tried to run:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<xsql:query xmlns:xsql="urn:oracle-xsql" connection = "bib" rowset-element="bib" row-element="book">
(SELECT year,title,last,first,' ' as affiliation,publisher,price
FROM book,author
WHERE year=2001 and bookid=parentid
UNION
SELECT year,title,last,first,affiliation,publisher,price
FROM book,editor
WHERE year=2001 and bookid=parentid)
INTERSECT
(SELECT year,title,last,first,' ' as affiliation,publisher,price
FROM book,author
WHERE publisher='Publisher1' and bookid=parentid
UNION
SELECT year,title,last,first,affiliation,publisher,price
FROM book,editor
WHERE publisher='Publisher1' and bookid=parentid)
</xsql:query>
This is the error message generated after running:
<ERROR>java.sql.SQLException: ORA-01009: missing mandatory parameter</ERROR>
When I remove the parentheses it works but this results in a different result set.
Can anybody tell me the reason?
Thanks,
Mustafa
null

(BUG): using less than operator in javascript

I am using Jdeveloper 11.1.1.5.0, ADF BC, ADF Faces.
I am trying to add some java script validation in my page, just want to check if the length of an input field is less than three or not.
here is the function I used
function filterForNumbers(evt){
var inputField = evt.getSource();
var oldValue = inputField.getValue();
var myField   = inputField.findComponent("it2");
var len = oldValue.length;
if (len < 3)
   alert ("the length is < 3" );
   myField.setValue("");
}when I use the less then operator (<) in this part
if (len < 3)ADF frame work considers the < as an open tag and when I run the page, it shows this error message in the log
Error(16,16): Illegal token.
and the page does not run.
workaround*
using this syntax instead
if (3 > len)

Thank again Sireesha,
I tried your suggestion with and without space. What I get is that the there is no thing on the page (only blank page is shown).
here is my page source
<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<jsp:root xmlns:jsp="http://java.sun.com/JSP/Page" version="2.1"
          xmlns:f="http://java.sun.com/jsf/core"
          xmlns:h="http://java.sun.com/jsf/html"
          xmlns:af="http://xmlns.oracle.com/adf/faces/rich">
<jsp:directive.page contentType="text/html;charset=UTF-8"/>
<f:view>
    <af:document id="d1" partialTriggers="it2">
      <af:resource type="javascript">
       function filterForNumbers(evt){
       var inputField = evt.getSource();
       var oldValue = inputField.getValue();
       var myField = inputField.findComponent("it2");
       var len = oldValue.length;
       if (len &lt 3)
         alert ("the length is < 3" );
         myField.setValue("");
      </af:resource>
      <af:messages id="m1"/>
      <af:form id="f1">
        <af:panelFormLayout id="pfl1">
          <af:inputText value="#{bindings.Id.inputValue}"
                        label="#{bindings.Id.hints.label}"
                        required="#{bindings.Id.hints.mandatory}"
                        columns="#{bindings.Id.hints.displayWidth}"
                        maximumLength="#{bindings.Id.hints.precision}"
                        shortDesc="#{bindings.Id.hints.tooltip}" id="it1">
            <f:validator binding="#{bindings.Id.validator}"/>
            <af:convertNumber groupingUsed="false"
                              pattern="#{bindings.Id.format}"/>
          </af:inputText>
          <af:inputText value="#{bindings.Description.inputValue}"
                        label="#{bindings.Description.hints.label}"
                        columns="#{bindings.Description.hints.displayWidth}"
                        maximumLength="#{bindings.Description.hints.precision}"
                        shortDesc="#{bindings.Description.hints.tooltip}"
                        id="it2" required="true">
            <f:validator binding="#{bindings.Description.validator}"/>
            <af:clientListener method="filterForNumbers" type="valueChange"/>
          </af:inputText>
          <af:inputText value="#{bindings.Flag.inputValue}"
                        label="#{bindings.Flag.hints.label}"
                        required="#{bindings.Flag.hints.mandatory}"
                        columns="#{bindings.Flag.hints.displayWidth}"
                        maximumLength="#{bindings.Flag.hints.precision}"
                        shortDesc="#{bindings.Flag.hints.tooltip}" id="it3">
            <f:validator binding="#{bindings.Flag.validator}"/>
          </af:inputText>
          <f:facet name="footer">
            <af:panelGroupLayout layout="vertical" id="pgl2">
              <af:panelGroupLayout layout="horizontal" id="pgl1">
                <af:commandButton actionListener="#{bindings.First.execute}"
                                  text="First"
                                  disabled="#{!bindings.First.enabled}"
                                  partialSubmit="true" id="cb3"/>
                <af:commandButton actionListener="#{bindings.Previous.execute}"
                                  text="Previous"
                                  disabled="#{!bindings.Previous.enabled}"
                                  partialSubmit="true" id="cb4"/>
                <af:commandButton actionListener="#{bindings.Next.execute}"
                                  text="Next"
                                  disabled="#{!bindings.Next.enabled}"
                                  partialSubmit="true" id="cb5"/>
                <af:commandButton actionListener="#{bindings.Last.execute}"
                                  text="Last"
                                  disabled="#{!bindings.Last.enabled}"
                                  partialSubmit="true" id="cb1"/>
              </af:panelGroupLayout>
              <af:commandButton text="Submit" id="cb2"/>
            </af:panelGroupLayout>
          </f:facet>
        </af:panelFormLayout>
      </af:form>
    </af:document>
</f:view>
</jsp:root>

Does Less Than ( ) operator works in the data template SQL within CDATA ??

All,
I am trying to use <= operator (<= sysdate) in the data template sql query and it's throwing Java exceptions.
I have CDATA around my sql and XML parser should ignore '<' symbol. Query works fine if I use 'ampersandlt;=' operator. Here is my query
<sqlStatement name="Q_1" dataSourceRef="">
<![CDATA[select * from table where date_column <= sysdate]]>
</sqlStatement>
Just want to know if this is a bug.
Thanks
Problem was solved. Use 'ampersandlt;' where ampersand is '&' for less than

Try this..
select * from table where date_column <= sysdate

Less Than operator not working, Greater Than operator works comparing dates

I need to compare dates to conditionally display a row. If the DateDueJulian_ID5<= AsOfDate_ID47 display otherwise don't. I get all rows but if I reverse the logic >= the condition works and only displays the one matching row.
I am using the Template Builder 10.1.3.4.1 and WORD 2007.
Any help is appreciated!
Thanks
XML Source:
<Header_Section_S3>
<Delinquency_Report_ID225>DELINQUENCY NOTICE</Delinquency_Report_ID225>
<VersionName_ID270>0001</VersionName_ID270>
<Report_or_Video_Title_ID53></Report_or_Video_Title_ID53>
<Remit_To_Text_ID68>Remit To:</Remit_To_Text_ID68>
<RemitToAddressLine1_ID2>XXXXX</RemitToAddressLine1_ID2>
<XX_XX_XX_ID259>2010-08-25</XX_XX_XX_ID259>
<Date__ID258>Date</Date__ID258>
<RemitToAddressLine2_ID5></RemitToAddressLine2_ID5>
<RemitToAddressLine3_ID8></RemitToAddressLine3_ID8>
<As_of_Date__ID46>As of Date</As_of_Date__ID46>
<AsOfDate_ID47>2007-11-29</AsOfDate_ID47>
<A_R_Delinquency_Notice_Detail_Join_S2>
<DocVoucherInvoiceE_ID1>1897265</DocVoucherInvoiceE_ID1>
<DateInvoiceJ_ID3>2007-10-11</DateInvoiceJ_ID3>
<DateDueJulian_ID5>2007-12-10</DateDueJulian_ID5>
<NameRemark_ID7></NameRemark_ID7>
<AmountOpen_ID11></AmountOpen_ID11>
<AddressNumber_ID17></AddressNumber_ID17>
<UniqueKeyIDInternal_ID19></UniqueKeyIDInternal_ID19>
<KAV_CustomerPONumber_ID23></KAV_CustomerPONumber_ID23>
</A_R_Delinquency_Notice_Detail_Join_S2>
<A_R_Delinquency_Notice_Detail_Join_S2>
<DocVoucherInvoiceE_ID1>1897265</DocVoucherInvoiceE_ID1>
<DateInvoiceJ_ID3>2007-10-11</DateInvoiceJ_ID3>
<DateDueJulian_ID5>2007-11-10</DateDueJulian_ID5>
<NameRemark_ID7></NameRemark_ID7>
<AmountOpen_ID11></AmountOpen_ID11>
<AddressNumber_ID17></AddressNumber_ID17>
<UniqueKeyIDInternal_ID19></UniqueKeyIDInternal_ID19>
<KAV_CustomerPONumber_ID23></KAV_CustomerPONumber_ID23>
</A_R_Delinquency_Notice_Detail_Join_S2>
RTF:
<?for-each:Header_Section_S3?>
<?if:DateDueJulian_ID5 <= AsOfDate_ID47?>
<?DocVoucherInvoiceE_ID1?>
<?DateDueJulian_ID5?>
<?AsOfDate_ID47?>
<?end if?>
<?end for-each?>

Found the solution! Use Date_Diff.
<?if:xdoxslt:date_diff('d',DateDueJulian_ID5,AsOfDate_ID47,$_XDOLOCALE,$_XDOTIMEZONE)>=0?>

Greater than operator for date in obiee analysis

Hi all,
I just need your help. is it possible to use the greater than or less than operator (in filter) for date in creating analysis?
FOr example: I need to have the greater than months from "January 2015" for specific measure.
Thanks!

Somehow the person records for this person have become corrupted. Have you any idea how that might have happened? Options:
1) Someone or some program has issued a direct table update on per_all_people_f
2) Someone has used Help > Diagnostics > Examine to modify the data
3) An Oracle bug. This one is unlikely but could happen if using an unusual form (Shared Person Form, for example) and perform a weird combination of actions/keystrokes. But you'd need to be able to reproduce it if you want Oracle to fix it.
If you're support contract is invalid or you don't have a support contract your options are limited. You can either:
a) Bring your patch level up-to-date and then raise an SR. If Oracle agree to provide a script to fix it they'll probably just do direct table updates to resolve this record.
b) Fix this yourself using direct table updates. This obviously isn't supported either. If you do this, make sure you know what you're doing and get it 100% right first time. BE VERY CAREFUL!
Obviously I strongly recommend option b.

Problems using ' ' (less than) symbol in JavaScript

Using JSC EA 2 and I can't use the less than operator '<' in JavaScript.
When I use an expression such as
if( a < 10 )
I get an error saying
"The content of the elelments must contain well-formed character data or markup"
However, if i change that to
if( 10 > a )
I have get no error and everything works fine.
Anyone else experience this "feature"

Hi,
Use the following code clip (withing opening & closing ) wherever you want to use JavaScript in JSC.<script language="JavaScript" type="text/javascript"><![CDATA[
// Drag onto the JSP Source -- usually within the <head> tag
// Your JavaScript code goes here, for example
function postMessage(message) {
alert(message)
]]></script>
You can create a code clip on JSC palette for later use.

Problem with the operator less than or equal to in a weby query

Hi all.
The universe is a OLAP Universe
When i created a query in webi and put the month in the filter area with the operator less than or equal to like this.
Month (less than or equal to) 2010.01 for example. The all result brings also the all values like 2010.02, 2010.03, etc
What is the problem and how can fix that ?
Thanks

Looks like you are using a less than or equal to with a Sting data type.
I think you should change to your filter to Year <= 2010 And Month <= 1. Hope you have a month and year object in you BeX.
Anil

What to do? Operating system update stalled - message installing software update less than a minute

What to do? Operating system update stalled - message "installing software update less than a minute" but that has lasted hour

Press and hold the power button for a few seconds until the power shuts off, then release, wait a few more seconds, and press it again briefly to restart.

Header qty is less than the operation qty.

To certain production order header qty is less than the operation qty. Please advise me.

Dear,
Base Quantity - Quantity of the material to be produced to which the standard values of the operation refer.
Operation Quantity - Quantity planned for this operation.
Base quantity and operation quantity may not always be the same, if we have partial lots delivered during the sequence of operations, the operation quantity will be equal to the lot delivered during the operation.
Base quantity is dependent on the BOM, where it signifies the total quantity of output after using the components of certain quantity.
In routing, you neeed maintained there operation quantity, and unit of measure of operation quantity accordingly with base quantity unit of measure.
Check up the Processing formula used in the Scheduling tab of Work center (Use SAP002 = Machine * Oprn qty / Base qty / No. of splits)
Hope clear to you.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar
Edited by: R Brahmankar on Oct 7, 2008 11:37 AM

How does operator 'less than' work with Rectangle objects?

Just found in legacy code the following:
private var firstRect:Rectangle;
private var secondRect:Rectangle;
if (firstRect < secondRect)
// do something
How does operator 'less than' work with Rectangle objects?
Doc says that object is converted to number if it is not a String.
Rectangle is not a String, though has conversion to String.
Please help.

IME the best way to know for sure is to experiment. The docs are only one person's best understanding of how things worked on the day, which is seldom 100% accurate. I find that even with code I wrote I can't accurately say 100% of what it does until I've worked with it for a while. Keep in mind that the docs are usually written when the code is written, so never expect more than a rough idea from the docs.

Less than a month and its already broken

Dear BT and Forum users,
I am not very happy with my BB service right now and have come on here in the hope that I might get more that platitudes and fob offs.
So... a few weeks ago my husband finally gave into the sales calls and agreed to have Infinity installed. Our reason - not so much faster internet but in the hope we might get a consistant service.The service we had before that was tempermental at best and we were sick of having to reset the router every other day. (in hindsight we should have just gone with an alternative ISP).
It was installed a couple of weeks ago and worked well until last Wednesday, since then the service has been a comedy of errors. To start with my husband confirmed from the outset that they problem was not coming from inside the house but the customer service operator insisted on booking an engineer.
We agreed to the Friday morning appointment. I booked the morning off work (using annual leave) and the engineer didn't show up. My husband called at 12.30 (they won't take calls from me as I'm not on the bill) and he was assured the appointment was booked in. Shortly after 1 I took a call at the home to say the "system" had lost the booking and the engineer wouldn't be coming.
I said I was in all day, he could come now but that was clearly off script and the call centre operative wouldn't enterntain the idea (annoyingly there were 2 BT vans in my neighbourhood that afternoon). Instead they wanted me to rebook another 4 hour appointment. I couldn't stop in Saturday and wasn't going to lose more leave. I said I would discuss the options with my husband.
What followed that afternoon was a series of coversations with them, some with me at home and some with my husband at work offering the same options and us giving the same response. I don't know if the operatives weren't talking to each other or didn't understand but it was really irritating. In the end they said they would call my husband at 4pm. They called some time after 5 and said the would try the exchange first and call us Monday morning if they needed to access the property.
Saturday 8.30 the engineer called to say they were on their way, we had the time so we waited. He arrived and was in the house all of 15 minutes before confirming the problem was in the exchange (all that time wasted for that!). We got a call Sunday to say they needed a new part at the exchange then today my husband got an undecipherable voicemail and a text saying the service will be fixed in the next 72 hours. He has spoken to them this evening and we're still non-the-wiser as now there's a fault further up the line.
Whilst all this is going on we have tried to find out if they expect us to pay for the Infinity and BT Vision whilst the services are not working. All they will say is they won't look at refunding losses until the issue is fixed. I realise they can't give us a total but it was a pretty straight forward question - am I paying for this non-service. One operator has said I can have £10 to cover the missed appointment (I value my time and annual leave a little higher).
In all honestly the loss of internet and BT vision is frustrating but what has really dissapointed me is the lack of customer service. No one in the call centres seem to have a clue what's going on (we've had so many versions of what's wrong) and are too tied to a script. There's no sense of inconvenience - I'm supposed to be ready and waiting for 4 hours at a time but they will fix it sometime in the next 3 day.
Right now I'm not even sure its worth waiting to get this fixed.
I'd love for someone to come on here and fix this for me but I'd settle for a little peer support/shared experience.
Thanks
L

OK, so I was being a little optimisitic. We're back online (yay!) but now the bill is just more of the same. Apparently we have to wait 48 hours before they will tell us how they are adjusting the bill I understand that they cannot confirm the problem si fixed yet because of some internal policy but they won't even tell us how much they would calculate as of now - a pretty straight forward question.
So with that, we threw in the towel... said if they can't asnwer a simple question we were off. Of course when I told then operator this he said he's put me straight through to his boss and then left me on hold for over 20 minutes before I gave up!
Called back to leaver dept. to be told we have to pay £200 to cancel (funny they could give us that figure pretty easily). I don't know what was said when he signed up but I am going to be investigating this further. We've had the service less than a month and its been broken a week.

Problems with the Fios 20/5 connection speed in my area dropping down to less than 3mbs.

I have written out a flyer that I plan to go door to door with. Since I am under contract with Verizon, I am forced to honor my side of the contract. Even if they are allowed to make me pay for a service that I am not completely getting. I am very displeased and as soon as my contract is up, I will change back to My local cable companies all in one that does not require a contract and has no issue such as the one I am having.
Do you have Verizon Fios Internet?
Are you on the 20/5 connection?
If so, you may not be getting the speed you are paying for. I am on a 20/5 connection and when my computer is on for longer than an hour the internet download speed with Verizon Fios starts to slow down until it is below 3mbs. It takes about 24 hours to get down to 3mbs but only about an hour or two to get down to about 6-7mbs when I am paying for 20mbs…
I have 3 computers in my home that have Windows Vista, Windows XP home edition and Windows Media Edition 2005. All of the computers run into this same exact issue, I have tried every setting I could think of with my 24 years of computer technical experience. I finally took one machine with Windows XP and ran a full format on the hard drive and reinstalled a fresh Windows Xp Operating system onto the hard drive so it is a bare bones OS. This way there is no other software on the machine that could possibly be causing the problem and found that when I connected online through Verizon Fios the machine still ran into the same exact issue. This proves to me that the issue is not on any of my machines.
Now all of this time my buddy that lives 1.2 miles away from my house has been having the same issue with three computers at his home also. He has Windows Vista on two machines and Windows XP Pro on one.
When I concluded that it was a Verizon Fios issue, after a few months of trying to get by, researching, diagnosing and losing much information in order to verify it was on Verizon’s side, I contacted technical support at Verizon’s online website. The agent and I went through the regular procedure that anyone would have to go through and I patiently explained what I had done to try to diagnose the issue. The agent came to the conclusion that he could not figure out the problem so he guessed that the Verizon router/modem may be the issue and told me he would send me a new one by mail.
I received the new Verizon router/modem, installed it and had to call to have it activated. Afterward it still had the same exact issue as the prior router/modem. So now we know it’s not my computers, it’s not the router/modem. My Verizon router/modem is connected right at the Optical Network Terminal (ONT), which is the box that connects the fiber-optics to your home, usually just inside or outside your garage wall. Mine is just outside…
From here my buddy, who has been having this problem also the entire time, called the local office of Verizon Fios and an installer was setup to come over to his home and trouble shoot the issue. My buddy called me and told me when the installer was headed to his home and I met him at his home to see what the installer found and in hope that my issue would be fixed at the same time. The installer went through the system at his house and was frustrated about not finding the reason for the issue and ready to leave without fixing anything. I simply asked that he stay long enough to see the issue present itself within an hour-hour and a half.
His laptop itself already showed the speed drop from 20mbs to between 16-17mbs, it was on its way down. He basically told us something that online tech support already stated to me, it is extremely difficult to prove it is on Verizon’s side. In other words it is extremely difficult to prove it, in a way that will convince Verizon to check its own servers, routers and software updates to their own systems. The installer, good guy, couldn’t/wouldn’t stay but we did convince him not to simply drop the issue. He called shop and they sent another installer out to take over the issue.
The new installer, great guy, got up to speed on what was already done at my buddies home. The first installer, checked and replaced the Verizon router/modem, checked the wiring and splitters. Basically went through the entire system up to the Optical Network Terminal (ONT), the box that connects the fiber-optics to your home. He pulled and replaced the Optical Network Terminal (ONT), thinking that perhaps the unit was compromised. While he was doing this job a tech was called and asked to stop by for assistance with the issue. The tech checked the computers inside and tried to do some settings that the main office informed him to try. I explained to the tech that the same issue was happening at my house, that I went through every setting I could think of and find online to help alleviate the issue. After some shop talk about what I had tried, including the full format and reinstall of the operating system on one of my machines, he just as I came to the conclusion that it couldn’t be with the computers and since everything that had to do with the Verizon Fios system from the street to the end-user computer had been checked, verified and/or replaced, the issue had to be coming from Verizon’s main office.
The installer had already checked the main at the road that has the 3x2 green service cover on it by the side walk. Everything was in good working order. The tech called the main office to see if my buddy and I were on the same hub, basically a big splitter that continues the service from the main office to the homes, we were not. So that was ruled out…
My understanding of the system ends there. The only other components I know of are the Main branch’s routers, servers and software.
Verizon had a new connection speed added to their system, 25/15 about the same time our issue began. So I am guessing that when they updated the system to include this new connection speed they corrupted the software for the 20/5 connection.
We have been waiting to hear from the tech that was at my buddy’s house, to see if the issue will be dealt with. My buddy has called him a couple of times and he has mentioned that he is trying to get it addressed and to call back if we hadn’t heard from him. He remembered who he and I were and what the issue was, so I believe he is taking it seriously. How far he can move the issue is beyond me…
I want to add that my buddy and I have been customers with the all in one package from Verizon Fios since their services have moved into our area, about a year and a half… It has only been since about June that this issue has presented itself, before then we were on 7th heaven with the speeds. We couldn’t have been more than happy with the services.
This issue has caused that to all go afoul, not only do the speeds get down to less than 3mbs but the speed is not smooth at all. Rather the 3mbs speed is stop and go, freezing in between at times, very choppy. Barely usable at times, unless you restart the computers and start over.
We are hoping that anyone with Verizon Fios Internet Services will keep an eye on their speeds by going to http://speedtest.net and doing tests to verify they are getting the speeds they are paying Verizon for.
This is what it will take for Verizon to take this issue seriously is to gather everyone on the system that may be having the same issue. I believe it is everyone that is within the 1.2 miles from my house to my buddy’s and will distribute flyers to each and every house in between.
If you find that your speed is not as fast as it should be please contact me and I will add you to the list, this way we can see exactly how far this problem covers and perhaps it will also help to show a pattern and understanding as to why the issue is present in the first place.
My contact information,
I have left this out here, you can contact me on these forums...

Actually what this came down to was an issue between Windows Vista and an Ethernet Card on one of the machines in each of our local networks.
Even though our two machines are 6 years apart, we both have the same ethernet adapter on our main desktops. A RealTek RTL8139/810x Family Fast Ethernet Nic. It seems that the adapter does not work at the 20mbs download speeds with Vista. For some reason the adapter does not shut down when the computer does? I don't understand why but it doesn't, it keeps the connection alive. I removed the ethernet cable and pulled the power cable and had my two other computers still connected to the network and found that the issue was resolved. The way I found out was that I used the connections on my main computer to hook up one I had laying around and through further testing found the problem no longer existed...
Then I realized that my buddy and I installed Windows Vista at about the same time, a couple of months ago. Funny how you can forget an important detail like that. Then I remembered that he had the same identical ethernet adapter as I did, I had noticed that while trouble shooting his computer at his home but didn't think it was important at the time. Until the issue was narrowed down to the adapter, then it all seemed to all fall into line.
Quite humbling... In the end, anyone who has Windows Vista and this NIC probably will have problems with the 20mbs download speed of the computers on their own networks. I tried the latest Vista driver from RealTek and also tried to roll back the driver, with no success....
Back at the beginning when we first had fios installed in our homes there wasn't an issue when we had the 10/2 speeds and had Vista. Then we decided to change from Vista to XP because we both were having issues as to what programs you could use and which you could not, shortly after having fios installed. Then when verizon upgraded us to 20/5 we were amazed at the speed and still had no issue because we had XP on our main computers with the RealTek adapters...
We reinstalled Vista because it seemed like we were having more issues with XP by getting hit with Antivirus2008 and its variants and thought it time for a change back...
It didn't really hit us that Vista could be the culprit because we both have a laptop in our networks that have had Vista on them from the get go when there were no issues... We also didn't notice just how bad it was right away and over time kind of left the Vista install out of the equation.
Just strange that one computer can effect all the other computers on the network, even when it is shut down...
I allowed the other two computers to run 24hours and the issue did not present itself, when I added the main computer with the RealTek adapter back to the mix it reappeared. The Realtek adapter is the only real common denominator between his machine and mine.
So now we have three choices,
We can go back to Windows XP.
We can buy a new NIC or a wireless card to replace the RealTek...
Hopefully this post will help anyone else who runs into this problem, it has been very frustrating to say the least...
Thanks to everyone for their help and I apologize for complaining about verizon when it was not a verizon issue. I came to the conclusion that the only part verizon really played was upgrading us to a 20/5 tier which I am thankful for...
Would be nice if this card was on a list that Verizon support could use to troubleshoot , diagnose or eliminate for future support issues.
Message Edited by keiser0619 on 08-06-2009 03:58 PM

Unable to create the Variable icon which shows Less than or equal to

Hi Experts,
when we create a variable normally will get a icon of the variable which say equal to symbol on the varaible icon. Hope everybody know that.
Now how can we change that variable icon to less than or equal.
Please can you provide me that information.
Thanks alot !

hi,
when you are trying to restrict the char select range values instead of variable.
then select the operator type (less than, greate than etc) and in place of value select variable and then give the variable name.
regards,
Arvind.
Edited by: Arvind Tekra on Jun 15, 2011 4:57 PM

Is there a fix for battery drain on ipad 2 IOS 5.0.1? drain from 100% to 70% in less than 20min had it on playing music with display off

is there a fix for battery drain on ipad 2 IOS 5.0.1? drain from 100% to 70% in less than 20min had it on playing music with display off

About all that can be suggested is to use the feedback form and talk to Apple. They have communicated with some users, trying to get more info to find out just what the battery drain is so they can fix it. Unfortunately with the myriad of operating systems, apps and individual tweaks, there could be several combinations of settings that are draining the battery.
My personal suspicion is that it has something to do with iCloud and the wifi syncing. (My ipad, before I changed the setting, was reaching out to find a sync on a regular basis. And it may still be doing so, however I set my iTunes to not automatically open to keep my device from trying to sync several times in an evening...not to mention the constant aggravation of iTunes opening regularly)
That said, I could be wrong and it could be an app that users have in common, or several apps.

Less than operator misbehave

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for