License denied why???

"error recovery license. communication error with the license server W_ADEPT_CORE_EXPIRED"
in italian: errore di recupero licenza. errore di comunicazione col server delle licenze W_ADEPT_CORE_EXPIRED
why that? thanks

ADE is very good at generating error message that have no meaning to any normal person (or indeed to anyone who doesn't have access to the ADE source code).
Also, it often generates messages that are clear but completely incorrect.
It could be reated to e_adept_request_expired.  In that case, check that the time and timezone on your computer are correct,
and also on any connected eReader device that remembers time.
Otherwise, a general comment that may help ....
There are lots of bugs in ADE2.0.  Try replacing ADE2.0 with the older but more reliable v1.7.2.
(You can have them both installed at once if you like.)
Version 1.7.2, it is a little difficult to find, available on Adobe site for Windows and for Mac.
http://helpx.adobe.com/digital-editions/kb/cant-install-digital-editio ns.html
The forum software is sometimes corrupting the link above.  There shouldn't be a blank in 'editio ns.html'.  The following redirects to the same page: http://tinyurl.com/diged172

Similar Messages

  • Purchase, licensing, payment Why after i paid $150 for the product do i have to buy a serial number to use lightroom for more then 30 days?

    Purchase, licensing, payment Why after i paid $150 for the product do i have to buy a serial number to use lightroom for more then 30 days? Why doesn't a serial number come with my online purchase? should people have to register a product they bought from the same website? why wouldn't this all be tied together with your purchase? total headache.... also i downloaded the free trial for 30 days and when my trial was up i went to buy the product and found it nearly impossible to find without joining something that has a monthly fee. Is this the standard for buying things online these days?

    When you purchased Lightroom you should have received an e-mail with your serial number. Better go back and check your e-mails that you received from Adobe. I think one of them should be a receipt, and should have the serial number printed on it.

  • Trying to post my question and being denied, why?

    I had an incident happen on my MacBook Pro and needed help with it. I created my question and clicked POST. After I clicked POST nothing happened and it appeared my question did not post. I thought something went wrong with posting my MacBook Pro question. I checked my activity page and looked for my new entry and it was not listed. I went back and tried to post again. This time I was sent a pink banner that read "You are not allowed to create or update this content." At the bottom of my question box it said "Auto-saved" with the date and time listed. I am confused now. I have searched all over looking for my question. It's no where. What has happened to my posted question? Why am I being denied access to it?

    The Forum is haunted with glitches, you ran in to two. If you get the you can't post message first refresh the page if that doesn't work try a little later. If you get the message auto-saved versions etc,. tap recover or type a new question. If you find your question is in the wrong Forum reply to yourself and ask if someone will ask a host to relocate your post.

  • Socket permission denied, why?

    My java Applet code's socket connection (to the same
    computer the Applet resides) was denied for no permission. Why? Please help. Thank you. (I have a RH Linux Enterprise, the
    latest version. And on my old computer-LINUX also,
    there was no such problem).

    My java Applet code's socket connection (to the same
    computer the Applet resides) was denied for no
    permission. Why? Please help. Thank you. (I have a RH
    Linux Enterprise, the
    latest version. And on my old computer-LINUX also,
    there was no such problem).Some browsers implement a security manager that only allows an applet to connect to the server IP from where the applet page were originally loaded.

  • Access denied - why? (warning - rant)

    Can anyone explain why it's even possible for Encore to commence a 6-hour transcode, then fail at the end with an "access denied" message?
    I mean, is it so hard to test for permissions AT THE START? Do I have to re-set all permissions on all hard drives to "everyone" + "Full control" to make this work? This was a "send to Encore" from Premiere Pro, so do I have to run PPro as administrator to ensure Encore can complete a transcode?
    Telling users to "Run as administrator" is not acceptable - that's just a way of telling them to use another manufacturer's products. Should I put this in as a feature request, or would I be wasting my time? Sheesh. It's a pretty fundamental practice of programming - test for these things AT THE START! I mean, it tests for suffiicient disc space, orphan timelines, etc, etc. It won't let you proceed without enough disc space. Why not permissions? How much code would it take? Why not test and set or request permissions when it installs? e.g.
    "Adobe Encore installer has detected you will need write permissions on c:\la\di\da\di\da to ensure blah blah rhubarb........Please click OK to enable correct permissions - [OK]  [Cancel]"
    Please don't tell me that it's someone else's burn engine that causes the problem - it's an Encore error dialog, so it's Encore's responsibility.
    yours in frustration and annoyance
    Bernie Dwyer

    >Telling users to "Run as administrator" is not acceptable
    Yes, the Adobe programmer's should add code to check for permissions before starting (request link below)
    No, the Adobe programmer's do not control either how Windows 7 works or how the Roxio modules inside Encore work
    It is a one time fix to tell Encore to always Run as Administrator http://forums.adobe.com/thread/969395
    https://www.adobe.com/cfusion/mmform/index.cfm?name=wishform

  • XS denied - why, pls hlp! tnx

    Hi,
    I am building a project where Java and MySQL are used together. It is a client-server project with F10 @ client side and CentOS5.2 @ server side. I use ConnectorJ as driver. There is a java.policy in place that allows a connect from anywhere on poerts above 1024, the line is:
    grant codeBase "file:/var/www/html/Tr/-"
    permission java.net.SocketPermission "*:1024-65535","listen,connect,accept,resolve";
    }I have embedded the login data (login/password) into the code, using these to log in (locally and remotely via phpMyAdmin) is possible, and the grant to the required database has been set. However, when my module tries to log in, I get an access denied. The URL to connect to the database is:
    jdbc:mysql:192.168.1.75/Central1Needless to mention the database Central1 @ 192.168.1.75 exists; has the appropriate user, with the appropriate grants...
    The stackdump is as follows:
    Standard exception : Communications link failure due to underlying exception:
    ** BEGIN NESTED EXCEPTION **
    java.net.SocketException
    MESSAGE: java.security.AccessControlException: access denied (java.net.SocketPermission 192.168.1.75:3306 connect,resolve)
    STACKTRACE:
    java.net.SocketException: java.security.AccessControlException: access denied (java.net.SocketPermission 192.168.1.75:3306 connect,resolve)
            at com.mysql.jdbc.StandardSocketFactory.connect(StandardSocketFactory.java:156)
            at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.<init>(MysqlIO.java:284)
            at com.mysql.jdbc.Connection.createNewIO(Connection.java:2569)
            at com.mysql.jdbc.Connection.<init>(Connection.java:1485)
            at com.mysql.jdbc.NonRegisteringDriver.connect(NonRegisteringDriver.java:266)
            at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(DriverManager.java:582)
            at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(DriverManager.java:185)
            at t1.axt.s1.cps.C1.doConn(C1.java:103)
            at t1.axt.s1.cps.C1.<init>(C1.java:57)
            at t1.axt.s1.Tr.doPrepComponents(Tr.java:1643)
            at t1.axt.s1.Tr.doConnect(Tr.java:410)
            at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
            at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
            at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
            at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597)
            at sun.rmi.server.UnicastServerRef.dispatch(UnicastServerRef.java:305)
            at sun.rmi.transport.Transport$1.run(Transport.java:159)
            at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
            at sun.rmi.transport.Transport.serviceCall(Transport.java:155)
            at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport.handleMessages(TCPTransport.java:535)
            at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$ConnectionHandler.run0(TCPTransport.java:790)
            at sun.rmi.transport.tcp.TCPTransport$ConnectionHandler.run(TCPTransport.java:649)
            at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:886)
            at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:908)
            at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619)
    ** END NESTED EXCEPTION **
    Last packet sent to the server was 74 ms ago.Please help! Any delay eats in my project time and I lost quite some time just moving from *** to CentOS already...
    Big TNX!!
    Thor

    grant codeBase "file:/var/www/html/Tr/-"
    permission java.net.SocketPermission "*:1024-65535","listen,connect,accept,resolve";
    }So you are running the program via .class files under that directory? So that directory names the CLASSPATH?

  • I didn't receive my free 4.7 license. Why?

    I completed and submitted the free 4.7 lincense form, but didn't receive a license.
    Will it receive it ever? And when?
    PS: Dropping the DV is ab absolutely bad decision :-((

    Did you get it yet?

  • Why do we have to pay full license fee when upgrading to FMIS 4?

    Just tried to order FMIS 4 but it's not possible to upgrade from FMSS 3.5 to FMIS 4. I know it was previously possible to upgrade from streaming editions to FMIS 3.5 and we paid only the upgrade fee (I think $3500) vs the full license fee ($4500). Now it doesn't appear as if we can upgrade from FMSS 3.5 to FMIS 4 and we have to buy a brand new license. Why is this so? If it's not technically possible to upgrade from FMSS 3.5 to FMIS 4 then why can't we at least get a discount for the money we paid on previous version licenses?
    I have a few FMSS licenses and I'm choosing not going to upgrade to FMIS 4 because of this.
    On a side note, it looks as if it's possible to upgrade FMSS 3.5 to FMIS 3.5 and then FMIS 3.5 to FMIS 4. Of course you pay for two upgrades then.
    Can Adobe shed some light on this?

    You can check it here: https://store2.adobe.com/cfusion/store/html/index.cfm?store=OLS-IE&event=displayProduct&ca tegoryPath=/Applications/FlashMediaInteractiveSvr&distributionMethod=UPGRADE
    I would suggest contact the dealer/reseller from whom you got 3.5 and ask him/her the same.
    if you still dont get the info do let me know.

  • Why do i keep getting denied when making a purchase through a game

    i have made purchases before but now i get denied why?

    That would be highly unusual, since the Apple ID is almost always the email address, unless it's changed later, and normally has to be unique to set up a new Apple ID. In any case, if you have two Apple IDs (or more), you probably need to authorize the computer using both.
    Regards.

  • ITunes gift cards - how do you use them in the volume license store?

    I am the IT admin at a K12 institution. I have two major issues.
    First, I used my personal email address as the administrative user for the volume licensing program. Even though that account is used as an ADMINISTRATOR for the volume licensing program, I can't sign into the volume  license store with it, because it's associated with the iTunes store. So I have a secondary email address. I tried adding that as a facilitator, but that can't be used because "it's associated with the iTunes store". I don't remember creating an account with that address, and I'm certain I've never used it to purchase anything. I can't delete it because Apple doesn't provide a way to do that.
    Down to the 1st question: Is there any way to reassociate one of my two exisiting accounts as a volume license facilitator?
    Second, I have a pile of iTunes gift cards that are supposed to be used for volume license purchases. When I tried to redeem the codes, it rejected them asking to have them entered in the iTunes store, which completely defeats the purpose of trying to buy volume licenses. Why would it reject money if it's on one piece of plastic instead of another?
    Setting up these iPads has been a nightmare. Any help would be appreciated.

    You need to call Apple at 800.MY.APPLE when the computerized voice asks why you are calling say Enterprise, that will get you to the Education / Enterprise division of Apple and they will be able to help you sort this out.

  • ISE ver 1.1.2.145 advanced license consumption

    Hello,
    I am puzzled with this scenario when it comes to advanced licensing, any insight is greatly appreciated:
    I have an XP machine that I am using to access network though ISE authentication and authorization. My authentication is EAP-TLS with machine authentication to simulate company asset. Everytime the XP station connects, ISE consumes a Base license and an Advanced license. Why?? I am note using the profiled group, posture assessment, nor even onboarding in my Authz policy.
    Here is the authorization rule:
    Here is the licensing page:
    base                             advanced
    1/20
    1/20
    Here is the only active session from active session report:
    xp-test.ashour.local
    00:22:FB:1A:59:C2
    10.30.30.117
    dot1x
    EAP-TLS
    NotApplicable
    N/A
    WindowsXP-Workstation
    Running
    ise
    And here is the live authentication:
    Authentication Summary
    Logged At:
    December 10,2012 5:27:36.331 PM
    RADIUS Status:
    Authentication succeeded
    NAS Failure:
    Username:
    xp-test.ashour.local
    MAC/IP Address:
    00:22:FB:1A:59:C2
    Network Device:
    5508-WLC : 10.255.255.20 : 
    Allowed Protocol:
    Default Network Access
    Identity Store:
    Authorization Profiles:
    PermitAccess
    SGA Security Group:
    Authentication Protocol :
    EAP-TLS
    Authentication Result
    User-Name=xp-test.ashour.local
    State=ReauthSession:0affff140000005550c6598d
    Class=CACS:0affff140000005550c6598d:ise/144192099/4026
    Termination-Action=RADIUS-Request
    MS-MPPE-Send-Key=99:b0:49:f5:e1:eb:20:a6:2b:2a:97:fe:f1:68:a0:02:a7:98:3c:03:12:2a:90:70:3a:6c:fd:ed:1c:3b:bc:4b
    MS-MPPE-Recv-Key=8e:c8:88:f8:fb:75:02:3d:32:48:8a:b0:9e:7d:74:5d:04:f7:de:48:3c:b9:c3:e7:36:e5:05:f3:c7:6c:21:7d
    Related Events
    Dec 10,12 5:27:36.072 PM
    Radius authentication passed for USER:   CALLING STATION ID: 00:22:FB:1A:59:C2  AUTHTYPE:
    Radius authentication passed
    Dec 10,12 5:23:56.647 PM
    Radius authentication passed for USER:   CALLING STATION ID: 00:22:FB:1A:59:C2  AUTHTYPE:
    Radius authentication passed
    Dec 10,12 5:06:07.317 PM
    Radius accounting start
    Radius accounting start
    Authentication Details
    Logged At:
    December 10,2012 5:27:36.331 PM
    Occurred At:
    December 10,2012 5:27:36.331 PM
    Server:
    ise
    Authentication Method:
    dot1x
    EAP Authentication Method :
    EAP-TLS
    EAP Tunnel Method :
    Username:
    xp-test.ashour.local
    RADIUS Username :
    host/xp-test.ashour.local
    Calling Station ID:
    00:22:FB:1A:59:C2
    Framed IP Address:
    Use Case:
    Network Device:
    5508-WLC
    Network Device Groups:
    Device Type#All Device Types#WIRELESS,Location#All Locations#ASHOUR RESIDENCE
    NAS IP Address:
    10.255.255.20
    NAS Identifier:
    ASHOUR-WLC1
    NAS Port:
    1
    NAS Port ID:
    NAS Port Type:
    Wireless - IEEE 802.11
    Allowed Protocol:
    Default Network Access
    Service Type:
    Framed
    Identity Store:
    Authorization Profiles:
    PermitAccess
    Active Directory Domain:
    Identity Group:
    Profiled:Workstation
    Allowed Protocol Selection Matched Rule:
    Dot1X
    Identity Policy Matched Rule:
    Default
    Selected Identity Stores:
    Authorization Policy Matched Rule:
    Company asset
    SGA Security Group:
    AAA Session ID:
    ise/144192099/4026
    Audit Session ID:
    0affff140000005550c6598d
    Tunnel Details:
    Tunnel-Type=(tag=0) VLAN,Tunnel-Medium-Type=(tag=0) 802,Tunnel-Private-Group-ID=(tag=0) 30
    Cisco-AVPairs:
    audit-session-id=0affff140000005550c6598d
    Other Attributes:
    ConfigVersionId=5,DestinationPort=1812,Protocol=Radius,Framed-MTU=1300,State=37CPMSessionID=0affff140000005550c6598d;28SessionID=ise/144192099/4026;,Airespace-Wlan-Id=1,ExternalGroups=ashour.local/users/domain computers,CPMSessionID=0affff140000005550c6598d,EndPointMACAddress=00-22-FB-1A-59-C2,EndPointMatchedProfile=WindowsXP-Workstation,HostIdentityGroup=Endpoint Identity Groups:Profiled:Workstation,Device Type=Device Type#All Device Types#WIRELESS,Location=Location#All Locations#ASHOUR RESIDENCE,Model Name=5508,Software Version=7.2,Device IP Address=10.255.255.20,Called-Station-ID=f0:25:72:3d:3c:d0:ISE BYOD
    Posture Status:
    NotApplicable
    EPS Status:
    Steps
    11001  Received RADIUS Access-Request
    11017  RADIUS created a new session
    Evaluating Service Selection Policy
    15048  Queried PIP
    15048  Queried PIP
    15048  Queried PIP
    15048  Queried PIP
    15004  Matched rule
    11507  Extracted EAP-Response/Identity
    12500  Prepared EAP-Request proposing EAP-TLS with challenge
    11006  Returned RADIUS Access-Challenge
    11001  Received RADIUS Access-Request
    11018  RADIUS is re-using an existing session
    12502  Extracted EAP-Response containing EAP-TLS challenge-response and accepting EAP-TLS as negotiated
    12800  Extracted first TLS record; TLS handshake started
    12805  Extracted TLS ClientHello message
    12806  Prepared TLS ServerHello message
    12807  Prepared TLS Certificate message
    12809  Prepared TLS CertificateRequest message
    12505  Prepared EAP-Request with another EAP-TLS challenge
    11006  Returned RADIUS Access-Challenge
    11001  Received RADIUS Access-Request
    11018  RADIUS is re-using an existing session
    12504  Extracted EAP-Response containing EAP-TLS challenge-response
    12505  Prepared EAP-Request with another EAP-TLS challenge
    11006  Returned RADIUS Access-Challenge
    11001  Received RADIUS Access-Request
    11018  RADIUS is re-using an existing session
    12504  Extracted EAP-Response containing EAP-TLS challenge-response
    12505  Prepared EAP-Request with another EAP-TLS challenge
    11006  Returned RADIUS Access-Challenge
    11001  Received RADIUS Access-Request
    11018  RADIUS is re-using an existing session
    12504  Extracted EAP-Response containing EAP-TLS challenge-response
    12505  Prepared EAP-Request with another EAP-TLS challenge
    11006  Returned RADIUS Access-Challenge
    11001  Received RADIUS Access-Request
    11018  RADIUS is re-using an existing session
    12504  Extracted EAP-Response containing EAP-TLS challenge-response
    12568  Lookup user certificate status in OCSP cache
    12570  Lookup user certificate status in OCSP cache succeeded
    12554  OCSP status of user certificate is good
    12568  Lookup user certificate status in OCSP cache
    12570  Lookup user certificate status in OCSP cache succeeded
    12554  OCSP status of user certificate is good
    12811  Extracted TLS Certificate message containing client certificate
    12812  Extracted TLS ClientKeyExchange message
    12813  Extracted TLS CertificateVerify message
    12804  Extracted TLS Finished message
    12801  Prepared TLS ChangeCipherSpec message
    12802  Prepared TLS Finished message
    12816  TLS handshake succeeded
    12509  EAP-TLS full handshake finished successfully
    12505  Prepared EAP-Request with another EAP-TLS challenge
    11006  Returned RADIUS Access-Challenge
    11001  Received RADIUS Access-Request
    11018  RADIUS is re-using an existing session
    12504  Extracted EAP-Response containing EAP-TLS challenge-response
    Evaluating Identity Policy
    15006  Matched Default Rule
    22037  Authentication Passed
    12506  EAP-TLS authentication succeeded
    11503  Prepared EAP-Success
    Evaluating Authorization Policy
    15048  Queried PIP
    15048  Queried PIP
    15004  Matched rule
    15016  Selected Authorization Profile - PermitAccess
    11002  Returned RADIUS Access-Accept

    Hi,
    Please make sure that the profiling is disabled for this node, it seems as if the radius probe and the user agent is learned via the http probe.
    It also seems as if you are hitting this bug I understand the description doesn't line up but you may want to have TAC clarifiy if this isnt experience on authenticating networks:
    CSCub56607
    Cisco ISE applies a wireless access session against the Advanced license allowable user count when it should not
    The wireless session in question should be applied against the Base  license count. This issue has been observed in Cisco ISE, Release 1.1.1  where the following functions are set:
    •MAC Filtering is enabled on the SSID and the Central Web Authentication authorization policy is applied
    •Profiling is disabled
    •Posture is disabled
    •The device in question has not been registered via the My Devices Portal
    Note There is no known workaround for this issue.
    Tarik Admani
    *Please rate helpful posts*

  • Cisco Call Manager - No all phones uses License

    Hi Community.
    I've upgraded from Call Manager 8.0 to 9.1. I did the License Count Utility Report and the License request from ELM.
    Cisco sent me then afterwards the license, I've installed the license and all done.
    But as you see on the print screen only few devices uses a license. Why?
    Best Regards Patrick

    Hi Patrick,
    From the ELM snapshot, there is no Unused license. This means all licenses are  being consumed.
    Can u please click on View Usage report on Unassigned devices in CUCM is first attachment shared by you and check how licenses are being used?
    rgeds,
    aman

  • "Licensing Has Stopped Working" with Mountain Lion & PS Elements

    After installing Mountain Lion Photoshop Elements will not open. IT produces a dialog box that says "Licensing has stopped working - ERROR 6 "  Restarting the computer is no help.
    How do I reenter my license - and WHY am I having to do this?

    Jeff,
    That link calls for deletion of the "FlexNet Publisher" file in the HardDrive>>Library>>Preferences folder. No such file exists in that folder on my 10.8 machine.
    It also calls for downloading and opening the LicenseRecovery111.zip file. I have done that and insise the LicenseRecovery Folder ran the LicenseRecover application. That app opens but appears to be non-responsive.
    Any other avenues?
      //DkG

  • CS4/CS5 License Transfer

    Hi,
    I originally purchased CS4 and have recently ugraded to CS5 both on the Windows platform.
    My shiny new Imac arrives next week and i want to transfer my license over to the Mac.
    Can anyone offer any advice on how to proceed and will I be able to keep say CS4 on the Windows platform and transfer just the CS5 to Mac ?
    Thanks in advance
    Graham

    Colin M wrote:
    You can't split platforms—you can have a Macintosh license or a Windows license, but not both. If you need Photoshop on both platforms, you unfortunately need two full copies of Photoshop.
    To say that this continues to be irritating would be an understatement.  Adobe sells an application (Lightroom) that can be installed on both Windows and Mac with no issues - you can have Lightroom on your Windows desktop and MacBook Pro with just one license.  Why they continue with the customer-unfriendly single-platform license everywhere else is mindboggling.  I say this as a Mac user who hasn't owned a Windows machine in about four years, but continues to see people having problems with buying the computer they want because of restrictive single-platform licensing.
    As for the original post, you might have saved yourself some money by waiting until you were ready to switch to get CS5.  You might get away with it, since it was so recent, but I think Adobe usually charges the upgrade price for a platform switch.  At least, that's how I understood it when I did it - I have seen references to them just charging a processing/shipping fee of some sort, but I don't have any firm data on that.

  • EM & Owner User ID?? Why?

    Guys,
    Im struggling with Owner User ID and Extension mobility.
    It seems to me that unless we set Owner user ID on every single hardware phone, it uses an extra license.  Why would you set owner user ID when you are using extension mobility? The whole point of extension mobility is that a phone has no owner, they can use any phone.
    The problem is, if you set owner user ID on every phone, users get an EXTRA phone appear in their UCM user options (https://callamanger/ucmuser) that has nothing to do with them.
    So for example, john smith may have an iPhone jabber, a CSF jabber, and an EM user device profile.  If you set a desk phone to be owner by him, he sees four devices under his UCMUser, even though he only ever uses three.
    This causes complaints and confusion for users.  The only option I see is just to not set owner user ID for the physical desk phones, but this results in using twice as many licenses as we should.
    Am I missing something here?
    Thanks

    Thats exactly my point.
    Why are we assigning an owner to a hardware phone, when we are using a feature (Extension mobility) that is designed to allow people to log in to ANY hardware phone (So phones do not have "owners)
    If we assign an owner to a phone, that hardware phone appears in the users user options web page - The self care portal.  This is silly.
    If you are using extension mobility then phones do not have owners, people merely have device profiles that are used on ANY phone and ANY hpone can be owned by ANY user.  Why are we statically assigning an owner User ID for a desk phone when the User is inherantly mobile and not static?
    I have two choices, do not statically assign phones, and use twice as many licenses.  Or statically assign a phone, and the user has the option to administer a phone (in their CM user options) that they may never sit at; And certainly never NEED to administer, because all of the settings are under their device profile, and NOT the desk phone because the user uses extension mobility.
    Can you see my point?

Maybe you are looking for