Lightroom switches Monitor Profiles

When I click on a video file in the film strip of Lightroom 4.1 with Camera Raw 7.1 it seems that Lightroom switches the profiles of my monitor. I calibrate my monitor using the Color Munki Display and before the calibration there was a horrible blue color cast on the display. Now the colors are natural, but as said, when when i click on a video file the monitor jumps back to the blue color cast it had before. After i close Lightroom the color goes back to normal. When i restart Lightroom everything works just fine until i click on a video file again.
Any ideas?
I'm running MacOS 10.8.2 on a fairly new MacBookPro 15" with 2.3GHz Intel Core i7, 16GB DDR3 Ram and a Samsung SSD.
Thanks for your help and greetings from Germany.

Run LR 2.0 final, not beta. The profiles are not supported by 2.0 beta.

Similar Messages

  • IPhoto cant switch monitor profiles in dual monitor mode

    Hi,
    my problem is that i am using iPhoto 6 (newest version) with the internal screen of my macbook and an external screen. Both are calibrated. Most programms like Photoshop or Capture one or Aperture switch the profiles of the monitors while going from one to another. You can see that, it just takes half a second and the correct color is displayed. iPhoto seems to be not capable of that feature. It stays all the time with the profile of the main monitor selected in ColorSync.
    Does anybody else notice this or am i the only one?
    The Apple Care Hotline couldnt help at all...
    Btw. It is exactly the same problem with Safari.
    Cheers
    Axel

    Thank you Terence for your reply.
    I think you are right. But nevertheless I need to know what I am dealing with. Sometimes I am just not sure wether running on the correct profile or not. That makes work sometimes a bit difficult.
    Also I am angry because it took me a few days and a thousend nervs to find out what the problem is. Apple doesnt know of this program as far as they told me. I wonder if this is a known "bug" or if this should not be the way it is. Maybe these programs are usually able to switch the profiles. I just dont know. That is what I want to know.
    Cheers
    Axel

  • Lightroom/photoshop seem to use the default monitor profile when printing

    I had my color workflow setup fine and I have no idea what happened. It's been working as long as I can remember. My monitor is calibrated with an eye-one display 2. When I print, the print colors no longer match the monitor colors.  Trying to figure out what is going on, I noticed that if I switch the monitior profile to "Display" the print colors made match the "Display" monitor colors rather than the monitor colors present when its profile is set to the calibrated profile. I get the same behavoir in photoshop and lightroom.
    To recap:
    1. profile/calibrate the monitor with an eye-one display 2
    2. set the monitor profile to the new calibrated profile.
    2.5 take a look at the soft proof. everything looks good.
    3. make a print using the correct paper profile, lightroom or photoshop managing the color,
    4. the print colors don't match the monitor
    5.  fooling around, set the monitor profile to "Display". Those are the colors that show up on my print.
    Any ideas as to what's going on?
    The particulars: OSX 10.7.5, Photoshop CS6 13.0.4, Lightroom 4.4
    Thanks.

    There are lots of colour spaces here!
    The image has a colour space.  If it's a jpeg it's probably sRGB or Adobe RGB.  If it's raw, then it's in the colour space of the camera sensor (which is proprietary, and no use to anyone until it's been rendered by LR, ACR or whatever).
    The editing program (LR or Photoshop) has a "working colour space".  This is the working space the program does it's image manipulation in.  For Photoshop you can choose, for LR it's always ProPhoto RGB (there's no choice).  LR and Photoshop internally convert the image from the image's colour space to the working space for editing. 
    Then the monitor has a colour space.  Assuming it's been calibrated and profiled (measured) by a hardware device (Spyder, Colormunki or whatever) then the monitor's colour space is described in the monitor profile. 
    Assuming the display profile is correctly set (in Windows control panel, color management) to the monitor's profile (which should be done automatically when you calibrate/profile your monitor) then both LR and Photoshop will automatically use the monitor profile when sending image data to the monitor.  Both will automatically map (convert) the image from the working color space of the program to the colour space of the monitor.  It just happens. 
    Provided:
    The monitor is correctly calibrated and profiled (with a v2 profile if there's a choice, avoid v4 like the plague)
    The default profile hasn't subsequently been altered in control panel
    then LR will automatically colour manage correctly.  There aren't any controls or options in LR to make it not colour manage correctly.
    It's much easier to screw up on Photoshop as there are lots of settings you can get wrong in the "Color Settings" panel.  So if there's a difference in colour between Lightroom and Photoshop it's virtually always a wrong setting in Photoshop, unless the monitor profile is incorrect. 

  • Lightroom not using the Monitor Profile

    I have recently set up a new computer with a new monitor. When I got PS and Lightroom set up on the new system I noticed that when viewing photos in both applications the colors are VERY different compared to how they look viewed online or in another photo viewer from my desktop (windows 8). I also noticed that when I opened PS I got a message saying that the Monitor Profile is "bad" and I could opt out to ignore the profile. When I did ignore it the color looks fine. Blacks are black, gray's are gray, etc . . . Anyway, I am wondering if there is a way I can have Lightroom ignore the profile as well. I have a monitor calibrator and I will try that, but I am wondering if it will do anything only because other applications look fine. Hope someone can shed some light on this!

    First of all, Photoshop and Lightroom are fully color managed applications that will actually use the monitor profile to display the image.Many other applications (viewers/browsers) are not and will just ignore it. So there's a difference right there.
    That said, when you get that message in Photoshop, it means exactly what it says. That profile is bad and should not be used.
    The real solution is to use a calibrator to make a new custom profile for your monitor. Until you get that up and running, use sRGB IEC61966-22.1 as monitor profile. You set this up in Control Panel > Color Management > Devices:

  • ****yellowish color shift in LIGHTROOM: disabling monitor color profile in LR?

    Hi all,
    I would love to know if there is a way to ***disable the monitor (color) profile**** in LR.
    WHY?
    Cause all my pictures seems yellowish in LR, and not anywhere else (firefox, i.e, photoshop, xnview, etc...)
    I solved the same problem in PHOTOSHOP, this way :
    when loading images in photoshop, during starting up, I got this very message :
            " The monitor profile 'LG L245WP' appears to be defective. Please rerun your monitor calibration software. "
    with two possible options :
            "Ignore profile" or "use anyway"
    Then if I use "Ignore profile" everything is fine!
    If I select "use anyway" --> Wrong, all my pictures are yellowish.
    That's why I WOULD LOVE TO KNOW, pleaaaaaase if I can do the same in LR.
    I personnally didn't find, or what else I should do ?!  Knowing that I do not have a ...too expensive!... calibration tool , and my monitor is a LG, L245WP.
    ----> Thanx sooo much for your help.
           I would love to use LR, but this way I can't...
    >kiwiii
      form PARIS france ( excuse my english level).
    NB : I read 2 threads here , but didn't find my solution : http://forums.adobe.com/thread/414524
                                                                              and : http://forums.adobe.com/thread/415180
    NB : in one of these I downloaded this RGB picture :
           http://forums.adobe.com/servlet/JiveServlet/download/2161301-16291/Farbprofil-Kontrolle_re dgreenblue.jpg
           where mostly the white in LR appears to be yellow.
           Looks fine anywhere else, and in photoshop, if "Ignore profile" is selected

    DdeGannes, Sean : thanx.
    I went to my vista profil , added a profile in relation with my screen... but then which on should I select , between the several sRGB options :
    - WCS profile :  sRGB     a file named wsRBG.cdmp
    or
    - ICC profile : sRGB IEC 61966-2.1 ?
                                       ( of course I have many more... but....none of the others are sRGB profiles )
    Then have you both a calibrator, and you both did all the color "chain" from CAMERA to PRINTER ?
    I am asking.... cause all these adjustments + buying a calibrator seems tough to me to manage/achieve.
    You know :  I'm not a professional ...
    To me, non - pro, it looks even more dangerous to do so than leaving evreything in default mode & presets...
    Should I do something wrong...
    NO?
    Moreover I mean : this is odd that my computer , or/AND (?) screen ,
    doesn't have a "default setting" which would be suitable in LR , at least which no colour shift !
    ( I just change my LG screen mode to 5600K etc... and still I have the same yellowish gap in LR )
    Why would my color management just be wrong in LR or Photoshop ?
    Doesn't this light something I miss to you both, maybe professionals?
    If I read you fine, + the other website... everything is kind of automatic now in every softwares... even xnview, firefox, (not i.e.) etc...
    so why just LR + photoshop, would be mistaken on my computer,
    and Firefox, Xnview, CANON softwares, Painter, ... all show the right profile & colors ???? This is sooooooo weird....to me.
    I mean I got the the point that my whole color management is unshure...
    but it nevertheless it should BE THE SAME through all my softwares... NO ?
    Isn't there a general ADOBE setting somewhere, that might be bugged instead?
    I still think , according to that, that we are missing something.
    Sorry to bother you with my thoughts....
    kiwiii ( paris - france )
    ps/ Does really Photoshop detect the changes I would do directly on my screen ?
         Because when I switch from sRGB, to 6500 K , 9300K or user... on my screen,
         I STILL HAVE the PHOTOSHOP ERROR message :
         " The monitor profile 'LG L245WP' appears to be defective. Please rerun your monitor calibration software. "
          I mean PHOTSHOP doesn't seem to notice (give a damn) on any change I make !?
          As for the rest of my computer I never changed any COLOR PROFILE anywhere... So how do people do without a calibrator to use LR ?
          Is it possible at least?
          Is my screen (i thought so good) totally bugged, if none of my color profile is "ok" for photoshop & LR ?
    THANX AGAIN FOR READING and helping me...

  • Lightroom color popping when switching monitors?

    So, this might be a silly question.  I have lightroom on one monitor and when I drag it over (the program window) to my other monitor it pops (changes color) after about 1/2 a second.  There is a shift in color.  I'm wondering if it is the monitors ICC profile or something weird like that?  anyone else have this issue.  Both of my monitors are samsungs (different models) and they are both using the Samsung natural color profile.  Thanks

    The colours should "pop" slightly, but should end up the same after they pop. 
    I have two dissimilar monitors (one much wider gamut than the other) but both calibrated/profiled.  If I drag the main LR window from one to the other, momentarily the colour is wrong for 1/2 second or so until LR re-renders in the correct profile for the new monitor.  For example, suppose the main window is on the wide gamut monitor and I drag it to the narrower gamut monitor.  Initially the colours are too pale (as it's using the profile for the wide-gamut monitor), then it re-renders in the correct profile and the colours become correct.
    This is what should happen.  If you're saying that colours are not the same on the two different monitors (after allowing the 1/2 second) then I'd guess one or both of the monitor profiles is incorrect or corrupt. 
    You say you have two different Samsung model monitors - but are you using the same profile for each?  That could be a problem.  Different monitors are very unlikely to want the same profile.  If these are Samsung-provided profiles, make sure you are using specific profiles for each monitor.  Better still: get a hardware colour calibration device (Spyder, Color Munki etc) and create your own profiles. 
    Edit: an additional check.  Display an image on both monitors.  View on the main monitor in Library Loupe view (e.g. type E) and also display the same image on the 2nd monitor in Loupe view (e.g. type "Shift-E" or type the 2nd monitor icon on the film strip tool bar).  The colours should look identical (within the capabilities of the monitors; a wider gamut monitor might display very highly saturated colours more intensely, but most colours should be identical).  If they don't, one or other profiles is incorrect. 

  • Huey Pro Monitor Profile and Lightroom

    I have saved a monitor profile on my computer, but don't understand how Lightroom uses that profile. I am currently using Epson and Ilford Paper on my Epson Stylus Pro 1400 and I have the correct color profiles for those papers.
    My question is, if Lightroom does not manage the printing, what settings should be entered in the Epson Printer Setup to ensure that the printer is using my monitor profile in addition to the correct paper profile?

    Wil-
    First, what Jao said :)
    Second: In regards to printing, a calibrated monitor profile gives us the best shot at a print looking like what we see on the screen, as long as when we print we have LR manage the color using the correct printer/paper profile and we turn off color management in the printer's driver.
    If you have the printer manage color make sure that you tell LR to not manage color. In this case, the answer to your Printer Setup question is you have to choose whatever paper option most closely matches the paper you are using. Then, you have to go through a series of test prints and adjust your print driver color settings until they match what you see on the screen. You may have to alter those settings for different prints, to adjust for different image color balances.
    It's really preferred to let LR do the color management, since you have both a monitor profile and a printer/paper profile.
    Tony

  • Monitor profile applied twice?

    Hi guys,
    the colors in Lightroom (and Photoshop Elements 7 Raw import window as well) look green and flat. I could fix this problem in the PSE7 editor window by switching off the monitor color profile. But I cannot find any similar handle in LR and PSE7 raw importer. So, it seems to me that the monitor profile is applied twice -- once from LR/PSE (which assumes no further color treatment, so does the correction itself), and second the graphics card (which expects uncalibrated color informations as input).
    Switching off calibration does not help either.
    System is
    Vaio VGN-AW31ZJ/F (Laptop, Wide Gamut display)
    Windows Vista Home Premium
    Datacolor Spyder 3 Pro, SW Version 3.2.1
    I'm desperated... I mean, this is not such an unusual combination...
    Please advice.

    So, last night I've lost my patience with Windoze... All thesepop-ups and advanced and advanced-advanced andadvanced-advanced-advanced options in sub and sub-sub and sub-sub-sub dialogue boxes drive me nuts.... So, I'm back tothe good-old brute force methods:
    From the discussionabove it is clear that (a) all I need is the monitor profile and(b) that the problem is related to the system (and not specific to LRor PSE7). Thus I simply have deleted all icc/icm files in the profiles directory, except the one from Spyder -- and surprise, surprise, the colors seem to be correct now (if meanwhile my eyes have not adapted to the wrong colors.....) Will have to cross-check with a printout and perhaps a "calibrated" proof print, if I can find one... But a priori, the test image looks fine now and is consistent with other monitor profile aware viewers. The colors also seems to be consistent with what I get on the Linux side when monitor profile management is enabled (difficult to compare directly in dual boot mode...).
    After deleting the "useless files", I still saw a very slight green tint in test image. Then I played a bit with the rendering options perceptive/saturation/relative/absolute in the Windows system settings -- before I could reboot the machine (to make sure that there are no left-over settings floating around), just in this moment SP2 arrived. Switching back to the default settings (perceptive for photos) after installation of SP2, I cannot see the green tint anymore.
    There's still some other junk in the Windows profile directory (wscRGB.cdmp, Photo.gmmp, D65.camp,...)... Dunno which harm this does. At least, Bill didn't let me delete it by default... Has anyone any clue what those files are about...?
    I also have tried out the v2 ICC profiles. Actually,  I was working all the time with v2, which is the default setting in my version of Spyder 3 Pro. However I don't see any difference in the outcome. (Okay, I didn't look at the rendering of the shadows in LR yet.).
    Regarding Firefox 3.5, I don't see any problem with color management a in firefox yet. Just want to mention that you can change firefox's color management behavior by typing "about:config" in the URL and then scroll down to gfx.color_management. Here you can type in the name of the monitor profile (display_profile) as well as the "mode": mode is  set to 2 by default, but folks report to get better (correct) results when setting mode to 1. Me, myself I haven't seen any difference here (yet). Actually, Jeffrey Friedl has very nice test pictures on pages 1 and 2 of this above mentioned Blog page where you don't need to guess whether CM works at all or whether it's right or wrong. For me, everything comes out correct.
     PS: Graphics card is according to the spec sheet an "NVIDIA® GeForce® 9600M GT GPU".

  • My Mac mini (late 2012) seems to switch colour profiles.

    Dear community,
    my Mac mini (late 2012, quad i7, 1TB Fusion drive) seems to switch colour profiles under certain circumstances, such as playing back videos in full screen mode (e.g. iTunes, Youtube).  After playing back for a couple of seconds, the screen switches and shows a bluish hue. Annoyingly, sometimes it switches between the modes. When I quit whatever caused the graphics to switch, it immediately changes back to normal colours and runs without any problems.
    Any ideas what might cause this?

    Sorry, problem solved. Dell monitor "smart video enhance" feature meets own stupidity.
    Maybe a mod could delete this discussion.

  • Monitor profile - does not stick

    Hello,
    I have an Imac on Tiger, 1 admin account and 3 standard users.I calibrated a long time ago with a tool from Pantone and was fine with it. A few weeks ago I bought my own calibration tool(Eye-One) to update the monitor profile. The profile is used when I boot the computer. When I switch to another account the profile is still correct. When I switch back to my account the profile jumps bto "Generic RGB profile"
    The interesting thing is that I can not change the profile in System preferences. If I click on any other profile I just get a "ping" sound and that's it.
    If I then restart the computer it uses automatically the profile I created with the tool.
    The profile is stored under Macintosh HD/Library/Color Sync/Profiles
    I assume that this is correct.
    I have not had this issue with the first monitor profile done with the Pantone tool.
    Thanks for any advice
    Sigi
    Message was edited by: Siegfried Braeuer
    null

    I have multiple profiles on my MacBook. I calibraded using the Pantone Huey Pro color meter and software, and the profile is stored in my user:Library:ColorSync:Profiles directory, not the system:library one. I've never used the Eye-One; did it give you the choice of location to save at calibration time?
    I haven't had any issued with the monitor profile being stored in my user profile. It's also stored in my user profile on my G5.

  • Odd colorsync monitor profile issue

    Hi all
    I have my monitor calibrated and its profile is selected in two separate accounts on my Mac. When I start up the Mac and log in to either account on its own all is fine. However as soon as both accounts are logged in then the monitor profile defaults to the Generic RGB profile and if I go to the display preferences I am unable to change the profile, I just get beeps every time I click on any profile in the list. Also if I go into the Colorsync Utility my Display is no longer listed in the Device - Displays list to the left, it is in there after a restart.
    This is getting very annoying because I do quite a lot of Photoshop work and need my Monitor to give me an accurate picture whether my Wife is logged in or not and preferably without having to restart every time!
    If anyone can throw any advice my way I would be most grateful.
    Cheers Derek.

    That's the same link I posted above.
    Stick DMProxy in every users login items and you won't have to bother going into Terminal every time you log in after your kids
    The problem is that *Login items* are ran only when you initially log in. If you simply switch users and then go back to your own user (which is alreaady logged in) the Login items are not ran.
    (I've just posted a question about this to check it out)

  • Lightroom 4 Color Profile issue

    I'm having real issues with my exported images from Lightroom 4. When editing the files in LR all the colors are fine, however when I export the images look over saturated and often horrible.
    For a better understanding of what I'm doing in terms of exporting, I've gone into more detail (with example images) on my blog, here: http://www.dannypaynephotography.com/blog/2013/04/colour-profile-conundrum/
    To clarify, I'm using a windows 7 laptop with Lightroom 4, using the built in monitor which has been freshly calibrated using a Spyder2express.
    Thanks!
    Danny

    This has to be a bad monitor profile.  Lightroom, Windows Photo Viewer and Firefox are all fully color managed and should, in theory, display identically. But a broken monitor profile can sometimes affect different applications differently.
    The Spyder 2 express is not a great calibrator. It's now outdated, but even while it was current it quickly got a bad reputation, and rightfully so. Luckily ColorVision/Datacolor cleaned up their operation, and Spyder 3 and 4 are considered very good, with vastly improved sensors.
    To test this, you can try to set sRGB as default monitor profile in Windows, instead of the Spyder profile. Control Panel > Color Management > Devices. I'm assuming, since this is a laptop screen, that it isn't wide gamut.

  • Setting Photoshop monitor profiles when using dual displays?

    I'm using a Macbook Pro connected to an Apple Cinema Display under OS 10.5.8. Both monitors are calibrated and I export from Lightroom to Photoshop in ProPhoto. The Photoshop working colour space is also ProPhoto so there is no mismatch there.
    When in dual display mode I like to have my Photoshop application on the Macbook screen and the photo I'm working on shown on the Cinema Display. In fact, I couldn't work any other way because the laptop's screen is not at all suitable for precision work.
    I noticed that when I send an image from Lightroom to Photoshop CS4 for further editing the colours were off in Photoshop. This lead me to check the monitor profile used by Photoshop and I saw it was using the Macbook Pro .icc profile. This seems to be used even if the image is displayed in the external display. Selecting the Cinema Display as "default" in ColorSync doesn't change the situation. As a result, the colours as displayed by Photoshop are incorrect.
    The only "solution" I have found is to either go to System Preferences > Displays  and select the external monitor as the principal one (which is inconvenient because it negates many of the advantages of using dual monitors) or setting the Cinema Display's .icc profile for the Macbook Pro as well (which makes it the one chosen by Photoshop but means I'm only working wiht one correctly calibrated monitor).
    Is there a solution to this problem? Ideally I want to have both my monitors calibrated and Photoshop detect which one I'm using to view my photo. Failing that, I would like to have both monitors calibrated and "tell" Photoshop to use the Cinema Display as the principal monitor.I don't want .
    Many thanks!

    Thanks for your reply!
    I'm not too worried about 10.6 because I'm not using it ( I reverted to 10.5.8 precisely because of the colour issues).
    I don't really understand your reply. My problem is that if Photoshop uses my Mabook Pro profile as the "monitor profile" my pictures - as displayed on the Cinema Display - look different in Lightroom and in Photoshop. It's as if Lightroom is "aware" of which of the two displays is being used whereas Photoshop can only deal with one at a time. I would like to know if this analysis is correct and what I can do so that Photoshop displays my photographs the same way as Lightroom does on each of my two displays.

  • No monitor profile available. Yellow tint after import

    Hello. I have bough last week a new Toshiba notebook which has Windows 8.1 preinstalled on it.
    I have noticed a problem that seems other came also on the same issue. When i watch images on a non profile managed software, the images look fine. Once i import them on Lightroom or Photoshop, the images get a yellow tint.
    The problem and a possible solution is also described here: http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=1164320 . This is setting the sRGB as a monitor profile. I know this is not a great solution, but surely better than what i see on my monitor. In any way, this unfortunately this did not work for me.
    This is what i mean with the yellow tint (left Lightroom, right Irfan)
    Today i tried following:
    Step 1
    The image is in RAW format. I import it in Lightroom and gets that yellow tint i described.
    I export it with sRGB in jpg format. The jpg file has still that yellow tint.  Please note here, that others that report similar problems, they mention that after the export they image looks again fine.
    Step 2
    I open the RAW image with Irfan (not color managed) and save it as jpg. The image is saved "correctly", as you see on the right side of the image above.
    Step 3
    I import the exported jpeg that was created with Irfan and import it to Lightroom.
    The yellow Tint now does not appear on the imported JPEG.
    One more tip i can give is: When i do a Soft proofing on Lightroom and choose sRGB i still see that yellow tint.
    What exactly is happening ? I try to identify the problem. Why i see just raw images with this yellow tint, no matter the profile i set for my monitor and no matter the proofing options on lightroom.
    I don't want to spend 100+ euro for a calibration device and not being able to use the profiles.
    Any suggestions for further testing ?

    First - Irfanview needs to be at least IV 4.35 and needs to have the LCMS.DLL plug-in installed as well as having the Color Management enabled so that you have some chance of your Photoshop and IrfanView versions of an image matching:
    Alright we have the first conflict here.
    I have the latest IrfanView version (4.37) , i saw that the Lcms.dll exists in the plugin list, and i have set the settings as suggested.
    Furthermore at the moment i have sRGB as my default monitor profile. Still this is how i see things.
    IrfanView and Photoshop have the same difference as before. Yes i have rerasted IrfanView on every change. I actually freshly installed also the latest irfanView version with its plugin.
    Photoshop - Irfan Side by Side
    Monitor Profile Settings 1
    Monitor Profile Settings 2
    IrfanView Settings
    About this
    As you can see the Adobe default processing with the Adobe Standard profile, at top left, is a little greenish.  This is compared to the default camera processing as viewed in the camera-embedded preview jpg from the CR2 at the bottom right which a white frame around it.
    When i open the raw image on LR, i have (from what i can see on my monitor) the same results as your Adobe default processing (Top left) . What confused me on your image above is bottom left image "Adobe processing - Camera standard". What is with Adobe processing meant here? The camera profile? If yes then how can we have Adobe camera profil but also camera standart ? If you mean the process LR provides, mine is set on 2012. But no adobe available for selection. I do not know if this is meant though.
    Here is my comparison between Adobe Standart Profile and Camera Standard.
    LR: Adobe Profile vs Canon Standart Profile
    One more comparison is of the files you made available including the IranView jpg you supplied as compared to the Canon JPG preview that I extracted from the CR2 file:
    What you can see is that the CR2 as viewed in LR and LR's exported JPG of that CR2 look about the same (top and bottom left), and the IrfanView and Canon-JPG versions of the CR2 look the same (top and bottom right).  This is your IV version of the JPG, not something I made, but I expect IV has just extracted the camera-embedded fullsize preview JPG from the CR2 file just like I did using a different tool, so they look the same, but it is possible your IV is using a Canon-specific plug-in that uses the Canon-supplied SDK library DLLs that can also duplicate Canon processing.  I only have the Formats.dll and the CRW.dll but not all the extra SDK DLLs so I expect my IV is only extracting the camera-embedded preview JPG.
    Yes i can confirm that also on my environment. The exported CR2 from LR matches the  exported JPG as also there is a match between IrfanView CR2 with the Camera standard profile export. Unfortunately i cannot confirm if IrfanView uses a sort of Canon-plugin to make the RAWS rendered automatically with the Canon standard profile.
    And if you want your Adobe treatment of CR2 files to look much more similar to your camera's treatment, then use the Camera Standard profile in Lightroom and the PS ACR plug-in.
    Question on this. Should i always put a Camera Standart profile on all my images after importing them on LR ?
    Also please, let me know what you meant with Adobe Processing. I searched on the web with "Adobe Processing lightroom" , but i could not understand what is meant.
    If using the Camera Standard profile doesn't make things look almost the same, then please post a side-by-side of LR's view of the CR2 and IrfanView's JPG extracted from the CR2--what you've linked to, just above.
    Here is a comparison between an exported JPG from Lightrom with camera profile (Right) compared to an exported JPG with IrfanView from the RAW (left). As mentioned before the images look identical, with the one exported from LR with Camera profile being a bit more vibrant. But not much of a difference.
    IrfanView vs Camera Profile export
    So in the end it seems you see also that green-yellowish cast on the RAW image. From what i see on the screenshots you made.
    The question now is why i do not see RAW the same as Adobe software ? Could i do this test with an other viewer?
    To summerize from my side as well. A monitor calibration is surely good to do. On the other side the cast i see on the RAW in this case has not to do with the profile but rather with Adone profile and the way this image was captured.
    PS. I must admit that is one of the best on line support i have ever seen. Thumbs up ssprengel !

  • Calibrated monitor profile 'clips' shadow detail in RAW images

    I've been using the Pantone Huey color calibration tool and like it except for one small problem. When viewing RAW images from my Canon 5D in Aperture the shadow areas are 'clipped' and really look crappy. If I do ANY adjustment to the exposure, shadows/highlights, levels, etc. a lot of shadow detail becomes apparent. It's especially noticeable on darker images. This only happens with RAW images from my 5D, and only when I have my Huey profile selected. Aperture and the Huey software are all the most recent versions.
    Even if I turn the brightness DOWN shadow detail suddenly pops into life. So the first thing I do when loading in all my photos is to do a batch brightness adjust +.01, or a batch tweak of the levels by .1. See for yourself... Apple, when are you going to fix this odd issue? I've been plagued with it for over a year now and it's getting to be a real pain. Thanks.
    Example:
    http://www.johnnydanger.net/temp/clipped_blacks.jpg

    I'd really like to understand your post because absolute vs. relative black point sound very close.
    The terms absolute and relative are used to describe different rendering intents (abs. vs. rel. colorimetric). Black point compensation (BPC) is another option when choosing rendering intents.
    The only conversions Aperture does [that are relevant here] are between its internal color space (which is unknown) and the monitor color space and between the internal space and the one it exports into (eg, Adobe RGB in my tests). I have not seen an operating system or application that lets you choose the rendering intent for conversion into the monitor space and Aperture is no exception. Since Aperture uses the preferred intent of a profile for printing it presumably does so as well for displaying (in my case this would be perceptual).
    Now since the darkest point of the internal color space is probably lower than that of the display using perceptual, or relative with BPC, or absolute should ensure that all shadow detail is visible. Since Aperture (and other apps) possibly honor the rendering intent of the monitor profile it might be that Aperture is mistakingly using relative without BPC before I check the Levels box and only after that switch on the BPC. Forcing the application to always use BPC or using absolute as the preferred rendering intent might therefore prevent you from encountering the problem.
    Does what I just said make sense. No, not really but then I don't really know how these apps work internally. And neither do my printing results with a number of labs [10 10 10] is always indistinguishable from pure black.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Installing Snow Leopard but also Boot Camp or Parallels

    I have a 2006 MacBook (Intel, core duo) and have a 320 gb HD, 2 gb RAM, running 10.5.8. I'd like to install Snow Leopard but also would like to partition my HD and install Boot Camp (or Parallels 4.x - I have that version, fully paid etc. but not ver

  • I have a ringtone that is not showing up in the voicemail list in settings?

    IOS5  Iphone 4 I have a ringtone that I would like to have a as a ringtone when someone leaves a  new voicemail message. The ringtone is installed on the iphone.  I can select it as a ringtone for phone calls in settings........ no problem..... But w

  • INSTALLING A NEW LARGER HD IN AN OLD THINKPAD 380Z - PROBLEMS

    I own an old but still very useful THINKPAD 380Z and tryied to improve it by replacing the original 4 GB IBM HD by a new unused 40 GB Seagate HD. To my surprise, using FDISK I could only find 8 GB, nothing more. I also tryied to update the BIOS by do

  • Urgent, related to discounts

    Hi Gurus I have a requirement. my client belongs to hytech industry. we have materials 10054 and 10099. he wants to give 10099 at 50% discount on base price, if customer orders 10054 along with it. on 1:1 basis i.e. in order if customer orders 10054 

  • HELP! Microsoft Project 2013 on windows RT with Lenovo Yoga 11

    Hello, I recently purchased a brand new Lenovo yoga 11. I tried downloading Microsoft Project 2013 via dreamspark, but I get stuck when I try to install secure download manager. It says "the app you are trying to run is not supported on this version