Linkage of SO, PR and PO

Hi
In Back 2 Back Order -- sales order, purchase requisition and purchase order are interlinked. Is there any link/number visible on Frontend which can show the linkage to User.
I understand that in Sales Order -> tools --> scheduling --> reservation details will show the linked PR and PO at different stages. But once item is received, no longer the linkage is shown in the form as it in INVENTORY. Qstn is How will the Sales Order User know what was the PR and PO created to get the stock from the supplier?
Also, in PR I can see the Sales Order Number in Note to Buyer field, but in PO how do i see the Sales Order Number? And when receipt is done, how will the receiving person query based on Sales Order Number and when receiving the Goods can see the SO Headerand SO Line Number ? In PO, for drop ship we have separate Tab at Shipment, is there any other field which captures the Sales Order Number so that the PO User can see the linkage of PO Line to Sales Order Line?
We are in 11.5.10.2
Any help would be highly appreciated?
Thanks

We had similar issues in the past. We solved them by doing a mini customization.
The customization created an short-text attachment of the type "Note to receiver" at the PR level. The attachment included the Sales order # and line#.
This attachment flows from the PR to PO and is also available to the receiving clerk during receipt.
However, once the PO is received, we did not transfer the information to onhand. I don't think one can unless the item was serialized or lot controlled.
Hope this helps,
Sandeep Gandhi
Independent Techno-functional consultant

Similar Messages

Diff: Linkage of Credit memo and Dispute Case in EHP 4 and EHP5

Hi Experts
I am bit confused ...on the Linkage of Credit memo and Dispute Case in EHP 4 and EHP5.
Does the following statement is valid in EHP4 or EHP5.
"You can add a credit to a dispute to close it or reduce the amount disputed."
If it is possible in EHP 5 or EHP 4, please let me know what is the procedure to follow?
If i need to activate anything in SFW5, please provide what is the Business function i need to activate.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards,
Meenkashi.N

Linking a credit note has nothing to do with EHP4 or 5. You have to do a config sertting:
Dispute Management-Process Integration with Accounts Receivable Accounting-Assignment of Open Credits and Payments-Activate Assignment of Open Credits and Payments
And make sure the business adapts the correct process: When you reverse a charge on a debit invoice you have to make sure the credit is properly linked to the debit note.
If this is the case then the credit will show up in the dispute case.
Rgds,
Richard

Need technically the linkage between Shopping Card and PO (SRM).....

Hi SAP Gurus,
I am using SAP SRM 7.0 and wanted to find out:
1) Technically the linkage between Shopping Card and PO (SRM). (Basically looking for required table names and the fields)
2) Technically the linkage between Shopping Card and Reservation (SRM) . (looking for required table names and the fields)
Thanks....

Hi Siobhan
thanks. but every customer wants to know what happened to his cart if the status is COMPLETED or not. Why SAP missed this small piece of functionality to show COMPLETED status via WEb transaction. I can see only this via REDISTRIBUTION WORKLOAD transcation status. right hand side green tick mark. this green mark totally mislead every body. mixuter of status shows green tick mark (COMPLETED + FOLLOW ON DOCUMENT CREATED etc) in redistribution mark.
Appreciate your reply .
I tell you in detail .
for ex CART went to ERROR IN PROCESS but no where the requestor can see his cart and he got dismayed and admin can see his cart . ok. if i go see in redistribution menu it shows COMPLETED logo. it mislead whole business.
Muthu

Event Linkage for custom Workflow and Custom BO

Hi Friends,
I have created one Custom Module Pool, Business Object and Workflow Definition. In Business Object I have created one Business Event and the event is triggered from Custom Module Pool using function module SWE_EVENT_CREATE. I have created event linkage in transaction SWETYPV and receiver type given Workflow Template No: (WS*) and receiver function Module SWW_WI_CREATE_VIA_EVENT_IBF and checked Event Linkage Active checkbox. Finally I have activated the Triggering Event in the Workflow basic data section. But the Workflow is not getting triggered. Can anyone of you give me a solution for this or tell whether i missed any of the setting for the workflow?
Regards
Sujith

Hi Sujith,
Did you include a commit work statement after the call to SWE_EVENT_CREATE?
Regards
Gareth

Cost Center Linkage between Functional Location and Equipment.

Hi Gurus,
We have found in our analysis that it is impossible to copy the cost center of a superior functonal location to a subordinate one when the cost center of subordinate functional location is changed manually.
We intend to do a mass change for our cost centers of all our functional locations and equipments for all our plants. We need to know how do we achieve this change of cost centers.
Thanks:
Siddharth

Thanks All for your information.
Actually the Master data team has to do a mass update of cost centers for the Functional locations and Equipments.
And what we have found is that when we change the cost center for an equipment individually it changes the cost center origin of the equipment to "D" which means independent of the changes in the cost center at FL level.
Be it IBIP or any other way what we have found that the linkage(cost center origin) between the FL and the EQUIP changes to "D" when ever we change the cost center for the equipment.
We don't want to change this linkage as it may have other consequences that we can not foresee at this point.
So, my question is :
If the FL and EQUIP linkage (cost center origin field) is changed(from H to D or D to H), what could be the effect on the FL and EQUIP relation?
Cost center origin :
D Independent of changes in cost center at FL level
H It is dependent on the FL cost center.
Thanks:
Siddharth

Linkage between Employee No. and Workflow

Hi all,
I have a requirement of Identifying all the workflows initiated by a particular employee, which are still "In Process" state. There are a few workflow tables that I have identified but for some reason, unable to find the linkage. My requirement is: to cancel all the workflows of a particular employee, on the basis of a particular condition. Any inputs would be helpful.Thanks.

You can get all the workitems with respect to a particular user by using the FM SAP_WAPI_CREATE_WORKLIST by passing SY_UNAME to the USER parameter and staus as INPROCESS to IM_STATUS_FILTER parameter this will give you all the workitesm with status in process with respect to the user you have mentioned.
And to cancel the all the workitems, firstly make sure that you want to cancel then , by uisng the above FM entries you can get the Parent workitem ID of each workitem present in the user's inbox, then pass the parent workitem ID to the FM SAP_WAPI_ADM_WORKFLOW_CANCEL , which will logically delete the entire instance of the workflow.

Linkage between the reservation and the requisition is lost in case of MRP

Input data:
2 reservation documents are created from PS:
reserv. 1212, Mat. 11111, quant. 50, date 01.08.08
reserv. 2121, Mat. 11111, quant. 100, date 01.08.08
after performing MRP and processing reservation 1 document is generated at MRP output -
purchase requisition Mat. 11111, quant. 150, date 01.08.08.
Task: how to disable uniting similar requirements during MRP run, i.e.
according to the above mentioned example there should be 2 requisitions at the output:
purchase requisition 333, Mat. 11111, quant. 50, date 01.08.08
purchase requisition 334, Mat. 11111, quant. 100, date 01.08.08
Task 2:
How can the analyst add to the newly generated requisition the number of reservation based on which this requisition has been generated or how to set (how not to lose) linkage between reservation and requisition:
E.g.: purchase requisition 333, Mat. 11111, quant. 50, date 01.08.08, reservation 1212.
Probably it may be done with BADI MD_PURREQ_CHANGE, but it is not clear how to define the implementation point.
Thank you.
Regards, Victor.

Hi Victor
The 1st part of your question:
The requirement of reservation is on same date ,hence sigle PR is generated.you have not mentioned what is lot size key being used.
Probably you can try with Lot size key "EX" ( I am not sure).
The second question:
you can analyse like this:
Got MD04 & see the pegged requirements . This way you can know what is the origin of requirement for a particular PR.
Regards
YMREDDY

Re: Diff: Linkage of Credit memo and Dispute Case in EHP 4 and EHP5

Dear Richard,
I'm facing same issue in my system.
I've already made the customization in my system but still i'm facing issue.
I'm not able to get credit in my dispute case. Could you please help me out.
Also help me to understand your below statement.
"And make sure the business adapts the correct process: When you reverse a charge on a debit invoice you have to make sure the credit is properly linked to the debit note"
Best Regards,
Jain

Please note you have to perform the config - and then run the FOAP programs to attach and then match the credit to the dispute.
Please note the open item within the dispute will be cleared and a residual posted against the customer whilst clearing the credit note.

Linkage Error in Mapping and Operation mapping testing for Synchronous in NWDS

Dear Experts,
Hope you all are doing fine..
I am working in a synchronous scenario Proxy via SAP PI 7.4 to JAVA Application supporting JSON.I wrote JAVA program to convert JSON to XML and while performing test for the JAVA mapping in response structure at Operation Mapping,I am receiving following error..
LinkageError at JavaMapping.load(): Could not load class: json2xml/bin/pack/EsrJson2Xml
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: json2xml/bin/pack/EsrJson2Xml (wrong name: pack/EsrJson2Xml) at
java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method) at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClassCond(ClassLoader.java:735)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:716) at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:537)
at com.sap.aii.ib.server.mapping.execution.MappingLoader.findClass(MappingLoader.java:195)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:372) at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:313)
I followed some of discussions for the Linkagae error http://scn.sap.com/thread/1418477 but could not help..
Following are details of my NWDS and PI server:
SAP NetWeaver Developer Studio
SAP Enhancement Package 1 for SAP NetWeaver Developer Studio 7.3 SP10 PAT0000
Compiled the project with JAVA SE-1.6 as well as 1.5
SAP PO 7.4 Java Only , Release: NW731CORE_10_REL
SP: 05 JDK: jdk16 Latest Change: 353688
I have taken care to export all the Jar files used in NWDS to be exported and then imported as Archived files in PI server.
But could not see the 5 jar files in ESR. I hope there is some issue with name as can see in the log.Can the issue be solved?
How to test the Operation mapping for Synchronous Message in NWDS?
Regards
Rebecca

Dear Hareesh and Experts,
I resolved the issue by doing the below steps.
1. Downloaded the JDK5 and updated the Java console i.e. JRE 15.
2. I had created this project using the JAVA Compiler with JAVA SE1.6 initially. Changed this to 1.5 in the Properties of the Project.
3. Uploaded the project again in ESR Imported Archive.
The issue is solved.
Thanks a lot for all your inputs.

Linkage between Payment advice and Invoice

What are the ways in which Payment advice can be linked to A/P invoice? i.e. One remittance advice per invoice OR one remittance advice per vendor for given period, combining all the invoices OR One remittance advice per invoice in case of some vendors and combine the invoices at vendor level in other cases. How flexible is this setting?
Thanks in Advance.

Hi,
this is set in payment run configuration (FBZP), based on payment method and company code. As this is configuration you cannot change this as required.
You could set it for example 1 to 1, menas 1 payment would have 1 advice.
Better probably to set at least 3 payments or more will generate payment advice.
Check payment advice control section in config screen
"Payment advice note upwards of ... lines
The number of lines on the payment medium where note to payee information for the business partner can be stored is restricted. In the event that more lines are required, a payment advice note is displayed on the payment medium and a separate payment advice note created.
This facility can be used for bank transfers, for example."
At time of payment run the system would consider all open items and based on settigns made in config would create/ not create an advice.
Regards
Hein

Plant Maintenance - Linkage between Task List and Maintenance Plan

Sir,
In Plant Maintenance, I have an equipment for which there are 9 maintenance activities that have to be performed every year. Out of these 4 activities will be carried out every month. 1 activity will be carried out during the months of February, June and October. 5 activities will be carried out only in the month of December.
I need to create Task List for all these activities and subsequently create Maintenance Plans for all these Task Lists.
Can I group all the 4 activites which will be carried out every month into one single Task List, with separate operation nos and time against each activity?. I don't know whether it is correct or not.
If I use the above method I can create 3 Task Lists for this particular equipment with same Group no and 3 Group Counters.
How to create Maintenance Plan for the above scenario?.
Eventhough, 4 activites are carried out every month and they have been grouped into a single Task List (Group counter 1) and if these activites are carried out on different dates within a month how can I create Maintenance Plan and subsequently create a Maintenance Order?.
I need some help in this regard. A detailed reply will be helpful.
Can anyone throw some light in this regard.
Regards,
R. Vijayakumar

you need to create one task list with a maintenance strategy with packages and hierarchy to outline the work requirements i.e. some tasks to be carried out 3 monthly some 4 monthly etc, and also if common tasks appear in 3 monthly package vs 4 monthly package then to suppress the duplicating task
you would then define a strategy based maintenance plan and run it to get the respective maintenance orders

There is any linkage between invoice no and cheque no.

Dear gurus,
how can we get the cheque no through invoice no.
there is any table.
pls help.
Regrds
Mahesh
*assign full marks

Hii..
we did it like this.
1.Go to table PAYR through check no. you can get clearing document Number.
2.Read this Clearing document number in BSAS to get BSAS-BELNR.
3.Read this BSAS-BELNR in BKPF for getting BKPF-AWKEY.
You have to do just reverse of this.
hope this will help you.
please revert if there is any query.
Regards,
Aakash

Linkage for RSEG and BSIS tables for tax item

Hi,
How to find corresponding tax line item in BSIS or BSAS table for a RSEG line item.
In case of BSET table I could find the linkage by BSET-TXGRP and RSEG-BUZEI.

The obvious link I can see is on bukrs/belnr/buzei/mwskz fields.
All available in all tables. The company code and accounting document number is normally enough but if there are multiple line items use the buzei fields as well. The tax field on is MWSKZ.
Same on both BSIS/BSAS and RSEG.
BSAS is almost the same table as BSIS but has the clearing items as well.
Message was edited by: Barry Neaves

GR and GI document Linkage

Hi All,
I'm an Abaper i've got strange requirment with a strange report.The requirement is as follows:
The report needs to show up the difference of GR Date and current date...........What i mean is lets take this example......
With sales order and without sales order...........a internal purchase order for some items is create to get the stock of material from vendor.....Once the GR is done through MIGO the material documents is posted......this as we know is considered as GR document and document posted as GR date........No lets say that the GR document has 50 quantiry of material XYX in the item.On the same day i did Delivery of 20 quantiry of materials and GI document got posted after PGI
Next day i'll be doing Delivery against this agian for 10 quantiry with and yet another new GI document will be posted after PGI ...........After this lets say GR is done for the same material next day with qunatiy 10.Now the current stock through MB5B it shows up 30.
Now on the selection screen i've got Material number and Plant as my select options in the report which i need to develop.Take the current date as 13/10/2009.
Summary of the above transaction would be........like this in MB5B.......
Material:XYZ
Plant:P123
current stock: 30.
Doc                  Number   Date                             Quantity
Gr document    123456   10/10/2009                    50
GI document     456799   10/10/2009                    20-
GI Document     456800    11/10/2009                  10-
Gr Document    123457    12/10/2009                   10
Now i need to show up for how manys days the material has been there in the inventory till date.As there is no linkage between the GR and GI ........i mean for what document the GI has been issued if i could get this linkage then it would be pretty easy for me to calcuate the difference of date............In the above case i could'nt get any linkage...............so how to calcuate that the stock has been in there for how many days from the current date.......The current stock needs to be considered again is 30.
Let me be more clear and specific........the stock which has come on 10/10/2009 is 50 if i take this quantiy as 50 and then calculate and minus this from the current date(13/10/2009) it would be 3 days and quantiy as 50......but taking the current stock its 30(so the logic would be wrong).........and another twist is........if i calculate like this.......i mean if i take up stock 20 as on 11/10/2009 it would be 20 again........so kind of worried how to show this up......Please go through this and get back......with some solution

i slove it by my own

GR Document and GI Document Linkage

Hi All,
I'm an Abaper i've got strange requirment with a strange report.The requirement is as follows:
The report needs to show up the difference of GR Date and current date...........What i mean is lets take this example......
With sales order and without sales order...........a internal purchase order for some items is create to get the stock of material from vendor.....Once the GR is done through MIGO the material documents is posted......this as we know is considered as GR document and document posted as GR date........No lets say that the GR document has 50 quantiry of material XYX in the item.On the same day i did Delivery of 20 quantiry of materials and GI document got posted after PGI
Next day i'll be doing Delivery against this agian for 10 quantiry with and yet another new GI document will be posted after PGI ...........After this lets say GR is done for the same material next day with qunatiy 10.Now the current stock through MB5B it shows up 30.
Now on the selection screen i've got Material number and Plant as my select options in the report which i need to develop.Take the current date as 13/10/2009.
Summary of the above transaction would be........like this in MB5B.......
Material:XYZ
Plant:P123
current stock: 30.
Doc                  Number   Date                             Quantity
Gr document    123456   10/10/2009                    50
GI document     456799   10/10/2009                    20-
GI Document     456800    11/10/2009                  10-
Gr Document    123457    12/10/2009                   10
Now i need to show up for how manys days the material has been there in the inventory till date.As there is no linkage between the GR and GI ........i mean for what document the GI has been issued if i could get this linkage then it would be pretty easy for me to calcuate the difference of date............In the above case i could'nt get any linkage...............so how to calcuate that the stock has been in there for how many days from the current date.......The current stock needs to be considered again is 30.
Let me be more clear and specific........the stock which has come on 10/10/2009 is 50 if i take this quantiy as 50 and then calculate and minus this from the current date(13/10/2009) it would be 3 days and quantiy as 50......but taking the current stock its 30(so the logic would be wrong).........and another twist is........if i calculate like this.......i mean if i take up stock 20 as on 11/10/2009 it would be 20 again........so kind of worried how to show this up......Please go through this and get back......with some solution

Please be specific about what you want to ask/know? No one has time to read such a big paragraph.

Linkage of SO, PR and PO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for