Linking Project to Asset and Legal Entity

Hi All,
I am developing a CIP reconciliation report which shows the beginning balance, additions, transfers in/out and ending balance of CIP or capitalized portion of a capital project in the Oracle Project Module and reconciles the CIP balance to the balance sheet in the General Ledger.
My report Columns are :
Legal Entity--Project Number--Task Number--Asset Name--Asset Category--Beginning Balance--Ending Balance
Total CIP Amount in GL =
Could you help me as to which Oracle base tables should I use?
Thanks,
r2

Would this be run just at month end, after closing? Or might this reconciliation be run at any time during the month? I am thinking that it would be run after a month has been closed? The answer to that question does make a difference as to what tables you might use. On the G/L side you could look at GL_BALANCES or GL_JE_LINES. On the projects side, you could start with PA_EXPENDITURE_ITEMS_ALL and PA_COST_DISTRIBUTION_LINES_ALL. PA_PROJECTS_ALL is the projects master file, where you will probably find out the project type (if CIP or not CIP). You would have to poke around and play with your data to see what might work. Every Oracle installation can do stuff in their own ways, so it is tough to give a good answer when we cannot see your data nor know how your company processes transactions. But those tables should be good starting points for looking at. Hope this helps a bit.
John Dickey

Similar Messages

Link between Fixed Asset and Purchase Order Tables

Hi,
I am working in Fixed Asset Report. I have a folllowing Doubts.Please clarify.
1. How to link the Fixed asset tables with PO_HEADERS_ALL
2. I took the Asset_Account field from FA_ASSET_DISTRIBUTIONS_V . But how to link with this table to other Fixed asset tables.
Please give me the link between these tables. It will be grate helpful for me.
Thanks,
Prakash

Hi,
This should be mentioned/explained in [Oracle eTRM|http://etrm.oracle.com/] website (which is down for now). Others who already know the exact link may be able to help.
Regards,
Hussein

Linking projects/daisy chaining and reporting to an LMS

Can anyone help please?
I am new to Captivate and LMS's and so far, have self-taught and read books and lots and lots of web pages for help and information - information overload!
My problem is this:
I have a large project (146 slides) which, having read advice, I have tested by breaking into smaller projects. I have Module 1 which is the learning phase for the user, some questions included, but these do not need to report to the LMS. I then have the Test module in a second Cp project - a selection of 20 questions which are pulled from a question pool. These DO need to report to the LMS.
At the end of Module one, users can opt to either take the test now or later. The user has an option to exit the module and take the test later (close the project - expecting them to be redirected back to this page by the LMS when they open the project again!) or click a button which will open up the Test module. The button to open the Test module has been set to link to the Test Cp project.
I've tested this so far by publishing both as EXE files and running through the whole module - it all links in fine and I move from one Cp project to another without issue. However, now I am scratching my head about how to publish as Flash files in order for the reporting to work, particularly as there are 2 Cp projects.
I have looked at the Aggregator function but don't think this is the right route because it automatically adds a TOC and I don't want one (unless someone can tell me how to switch this off in Aggregator..?!)
I have also looked at using the SCORM Packager, which seems to be the route people are indicating for muliple SCO's published to an LMS.
Here's what I have done.
Enabled Quiz Reporting for both projects and set up preferences accordingly.
Published Module 1 as a zipped SWF (all files - Manifest.XML etc created ok)
Published Test as zipped SWF - ditto above.
Run the SCORM Packager and added the 2 zipped files above to create one zipped file.
Rightly or wrongly, I have unzipped the 'new' combined project, located the HTM file for the first module and run it in Internet Explorer. Whilst this runs ok, on coming to the last screen to link to the Test, it falls over saying it can't find the file. It is looking for the HTM file in the directory where the original .Cp project is stored. There is no HTM file created here - just the original Cp file.
What am I doing wrong? How do I get them to link correctly AND be able to package them up?
I can't test this on an LMS as I don't have access to one or to the client's LMS - I will simply be providing them with the zipped file which they will FTP to their LMS.
Any help would be appreciated as deadline is looming!
Thanks in anticipation.

Raquel, have you tried the Reload Editor for setting up the manifest? Also, you may want to give ADL's Test Suite a shot for self-testing your package in an LMS-like RunTime Environment.
Now, it could be that I'm reading this wrong but it sounds to me like, when you say "There is no HTM file created here - just the original Cp file", there should be an html file there. If your button in the first module is scripted to launch a new html file in the same window, make sure you published the second module to include an HTM file. I'm assuming you mean "swf file" when you mentione "Cp file", right?
Reload also offers the SCORM 1.2 Player for testing your course in a RunTime Environment.
Feel free to reach out if you still have issues or need assistance in testing.

Intercompany elimination at legal entity and profit centre level

All,
I have a question regarding intercompany elimination. As far as I understand, BPC can only hold one Interco dimension per application. If you want to perform an intercompany elimination for two dimensions which do not roll up into each other, two separate applications are needed. Please see example below to clarify:
Data is reported the following way:
Legal entity Profit Centre Account Interco Value
The problem is that the profit centre hierarchy does not roll up into the legal entity hierarchy mainly because there are profit centres set up as legal entities. Consequently, the legal entity hierarchy and the profit centre hierarchy are two independent hierarchies.
The business requirement is to have an intercompany elimination at profit centre and legal entity level at the same time (hence requiring two Intercos at the same time). This is needed as some of the profit centres are set up as legal entities.
Can someone advise me as to how to resolve this issue? Did anyone come across a similar problem?
Please let me know if you require any further clarifications.
Marc

Hi
Try to use 2 application for the interco elimination
for the 1st appls ur entity will be the entity dimension and use intco as intco dimension
for the 2nd one use the profit center as entity and build a new intco
As per interco logic this is using the Intco property in the Entity dimension and Entity property in intco dimension
it is very impossible to do this in one application
Thanks
CSD

Link to .pdf asset is jumping to top of page instead of opening .pdf

I am going crazy trying to figure out why one of my pages won't open its links. It appears in the lower left corner of the browser to be linked to the correct asset, and if you right click the link and select to open the link in a new page it opens the .pdf fine. But when you left click on the link then it just jumps to the top of the page as if it were anchored to the top of the page or something. I don't understand it. I've tried erasing the link, erasing the asset and relinking but it I can't figure it out.
Here is the site:
http://www.generationsprimarycare.com/physical-forms.html#peforms
On the right column, the top link is fine, the rest of the links that are linked to .pdfs in the right column don't work correctly
Thanks a bunch to anyone who can help.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/grab-and-drag/
this addon is solution, finally found it ;)
greetings / pozdrawiam

Legal Entity Name

I called the IRS to get an EIN (Employer ID Number), which I need to create an iTunes Connect account. I successfully received the EIN, now I have a question while setting up my iTunes Connect account:
What should I write under Legal Entity Name?
my first and last name?
or my company name, which I had to provide to the IRS, although I'm an individual not a company?

Thanks
I already tried twice entering my first and last name as legal entity name, and I got twice an email from Apple:
When reviewing your iBookstore application we had an issue verifying your U.S. Tax ID and legal entity name with the records at the IRS. You can reenter your information here
Could the problem be that I registered my US Tax ID last wednesday April 11th?

What is a Legal Entity and Operating Unit??

Hi,
Could someone let me know what exactly is a Legal Entity and Operating Unit. The definition or explanation in the documentation is not satisfactory or clear. What are the differences between the above.
And where in the per_all_assignments_f table is the Legal entity stored. I know that the Legal entity is stored in the Statutory information in the assignments screen. Also can someone let me how based on the company code in the organization the legal entity is linked. Where in the tables is this link maintained?
Could someone let me know the above.
Thanks
Shekar.

Dear Shekar
what exactly is a Legal Entity and Operating Unit?
ANS: According the Book or user guide definitions says:
GRE/Legal Entity: Use this classification to represent the following organizations:
Ultimate Legal Entity: this represents the enterprise, and typically, the enterprise is the highest (global) level of a business organization.
Legal Entity: this represents the designated legal employer for all employment-related activities. The legal authorities in a country recognize this organization as a separate employer. In an organization hierarchy, a legal entity may report to an operating company or to the ultimate legal entity.
Consolidated Legal Entity: this organization acts on behalf of multiple operating companies that are not legally registered, or simply on behalf of the enterprise in a country.
See Shekar the Legal Entity is taken under Classification is we know that the organization is going to show the Taxation to the Government. where as if u take typical UAE countruies here every store is an LLC and they submit the taxing for every store or shop.
Where as Operating Unit is generally used for the different lines of business which are under that Business GRoup
Say for an Example:
ABC is the Company name and that has its root in UAE, Qatar and Oman
then it is like ABC Business Group > UAE Legal Entity > REtail/Property/Furniture etc are the Operating Units.
Hope this information is helpful and clear to you or else let me know if you have any concerns.
Coming to the Company Code we use the code for the Inventory Organizations so that the clients will not get confused with the existing code and the system code so generally we use the same codes for it.

Double Cost A/c impact of brrow & lent and Intrcompany in same legal entity

Hello Experts / Dina,
Could someone please explain me the double cost accounting impact on borrowed and lent process and inter-company accounting in same legal entity scenario?
Example – Lets say US company X-star running the project on Mobile Apps development in US consulting division (Project Organization) and the resources from marketing division (Expenditure organization) are working on it on developing marketing campaign and decided to share the cost 100%.
Using Borrow and Lent:-Assume MIS cost is charge of USD 100 on Project Mobile Apps Development. A/c is
Debit- US Company-Marketing (Expenditure Org)-MIS Cost A/c (Expense A/c)-100 USD.
Then if you use borrowed and lent accounting method the accounting entries will be generated as
Debit- cost to US Company –US Consulting (Project Org) – MIS Cost A/c (Expense A/c)-100 USD
Credit- cost to US Company-Marketing (Expenditure Org)-MIS Cost A/c (Expense A/c)-100 USD.
In this case cost on Expenditure organization is totally reverse and cost is only charge to provider organization.
In Inter-company scenario:- But let say if you are trying to implement the same scenario using inter-company accounting.
Then MIS cost charge of USD 100 on project will derive the same accounting as mentioned above.
Debit- US Company-Marketing (Expenditure Org)-MIS Cost A/c (Expense A/c)-100 USD.
Revenue will generate below accounting.
Credit- US Company-Marketing (Expenditure Org)-MIS Revenue A/c (Revenue A/c)-100 USD.
And payables intercompany invoice in provider organization will generate below accounting.
Debit- cost to US Company –US Consulting (Project Org) – MIS Intercompany Cost A/c (Expense A/c)-100 USD.
Now the question is why in Inter-company scenario (2nd case example ) the cost of expenditure organization is not reverse similar like in borrow and lent scenario? I guess implementation of intercompany scenario results in double costing for same company (within legal entity).
But this might look properly when you implement inter-company approach across legal entity as company can report separate expense and (internal-external) revenue across company.
Similarly like inter-company scenario when you use inter project billing, you end up in creating double costing. Am I right?
Please let me know whether my understanding is correct?
Your reply on this will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks
:-)

Hi
Here are my responses along side your questions:
1.With borrow and lent you cannot only cross charge within the same operating unit but also cross charge across operating unit only within same legal entity. Am I right?
No. Borrow and Lent works only within the same operating unit. This functionality does not involve supplier and customer invoices, only accounting entries. When you cross operating units you must use the intercompany billing process.
2.On the below example explained below sec 2.1; this perfectly works fine in scenario where organization within legal entities are agree to share the revenue.
But what if the organizations agreed to share the cost? In that case it should generates the accounting mentioned below in section 2.2. Am I right.?
2.1>; (Example provided by you- share revenue)
Debit org B on "Internally Purchased Cost" account
Credit org A on "internal Revenue" account
2.2>;(same Example used by me with diff scenario of sharing the cost)
Debit org B on "Internally Purchased Cost" account
Credit org A on "Labor Cost A/c" account
If so then isn't it nullifying the cost generated by Org A previously.
2.2.1>;
Debit Org A on "Labor Cost A/c"
after generating borrow & lent
Debit org B on "Internally Purchased Cost" account
Credit org A on "Labor Cost A/c" account
Resulting in general ledger module showing the cost on Org B "Internally purchase cost"
Am I right?
In my example the credit of the provider organization is on account - Internal revenue. This is not considered as revenue share, since the revenue of org A from its customer agreement is not decreased.
Internal revenue and internal purchased costs are two accounts that are different from the norma business accounts. When you report in GL for the organization A you will get external revenue of 1000, labor cost of A of 300, and internal purchased cost of 400. So margin of org A is 1000-300-400 = 300.
When you report in GL for the organization B you will get internal revenue of 400, labor cost of 370, and org B margin is 400 - 370 = 30.
When you report in GL for the entire company (summary of bot organizations) you will have - External revenue of 1000, labor cost of 670, and total margin of 330.
Note the margin of the company is shared by org A -300, and org b - 30.
To get the report of the total company I did not included the internal trading accounts - the internal purchased cost and the internal revenue.
In the approach you provided you credited the cost of org B, rather than credit an internal revenue account. That is also a legitimate approach. However for audit use I could suggest to use a separate account for crediting the costs o org B, and not the same original account of labor A/C.
3.But lets say now if organization are agreed to share the cost but instead of using borrow and lent, they are agreed to use inter-company functionality then
accounting entries will result mentioned below.Am I right?
3.1>;
Cost - Debit Org A on "Labor Cost A/c" account
Inter-comp Invoice - Debit Org A on "Inter Receivable A/c" account
Credit Org A on "Inter-revenue A/c" account
Payables inter invoice - Debit Org B on "internally purchase a/c" account
The accounting results of both processes could be the same. The difference is the introducing of AP & AR invoices and the need to run payments on both sides. In any case on org A you always debit an account which means internally purchase, cost purchased from another organization. On org B you always credit an account that could be named internal revenue or cost reimbursement or cost reduction, etc.
Now my worries are if both the process agrees on same principle of sharing the cost design for
same purpose then why results in different accounting by finally creating double costing on Org A and Org B as well. Am I not sure whether my understanding is correct. Please help.
Also mentioned by you earlier..
"In GL you may want to offset both the internal trade accounts on a balancing value of cost center. So the internal revenue credit will offset the internally purchased cost debit."
I am not sure how you can offset the internal revenue and cost account for Org A in GL. (is this done manually??) Could you please explain in detail if possible?
My note about the need to offset in GL is related to the method of reporting. As explained in the example above, when reporting on the entire company you need to omit the internal trade accounts. The method I use is to set up additional cost center value in GL which is not related to any real organization. This cost center is used for offset entries.
I take the balance of internal purchased cost from of organizations and create a journal entry of the same amount but negative for the offset cost center. The same is done for the balance of internal revenue of all cost center. As a result the total internal purchased cost and the total of internal revenue at company level (accross all cost centers) is zero. Now you can report on the entire company without the affect of the internal trade. Those journal entries may be created automatically by allocation rules set up in GL.
Dina

First Party Legal Entity link with Fiscal Classification Type Code- R12

Hello Team
We are working on one of the dimension on E- Tax (BI Apps).
As part of the dimension we need to identify the Legal entity and the linked Fiscal Classification Type Code (Associated Fiscal Classifications) to it. This we are able to see from the application with the following navigation.
Parties: Party Tax Profiles > Party Tax Profiles > Query with the First Party Legal Entity.
Now would seek your help from the technical perspective. How is this linkage happens between Legal Entity and Fiscal Classification Type Code (Associated Fiscal Classifications to it)? We have verified few tables and there is no link available.
If possible provide us the Join Conditions.
Regards
Pawan Tallam

Hello Hansen,
I found this note on My Support:
"R12. EBTax. How to Differentiate Tax Rate Code for Payables and Receivables Transactions in Tax Classification Code LOV (List of Values). [ID 756985.1]
Tax Classification Code LOV ( List of Values) is showing all tax rates created in EBTax. You need to choose your tax rate code in the list of values on tax classification code in Payables or Receivables. How do you differentiate the Tax Rate Code for Payables and Receivables transactions in the Tax Classification Code LOV?
*Solution*
Please note that in R12, there is a centralized tax engine. Tax set up made in EBTax will be and can be applicable to both Payables and Receivables. Any tax rate created in EBTax, will be available as a Tax Classification Code LOV in both these applications. It cannot be restricted and it is the intended functionality.
If Payables and Receivables exist with unique operating units then the MOAC security settings can be used to restrict the LOV. Additionally if EBTax is configured propertly the tax classification codes will not be used for tax determination except in exception based scenarios. Please see the case study in *Note 577996.1* for examples
I just setup ebTax using tax codes for AR and AR and, by the moment, the tax codes from both modules are shared on the LOV. We used a convention for the code naming...but I'm will be looking note 577996.1
Regards.

Project manager premiere and AE links is there an easy way ?

Hi,
I would love to know if someone has a better workflow for trimming, even if you want to backup them or just duplicate them for another new project.
I use a lot of dynamic links in my project, I keep everything really organize, so I backup my project by trimming premiere pro, collect files in AE, clean and copy with assets C4D projects, and duplicate the whole folder of audition ( I've never understand how audition manage files so I copy everything)
But I would love just click project manager in Premiere, select my finished sequence, trim the project and create a new folder. the problem is that dynamic links arent copy.
So is there any way to trim the whole CC projects, and what i mean with this is some function where everything on your timeline, AE projects with assets, Audition files assets, Speedgrade sessions, c4d, and premiere project is duplicate and create with everything you will need for backup or create a new project from there
if anyone has a better workflow please let me know
thanks

Thanks for the suggestion. I was thinking that I would have to do that unless there was some easier automated way. I was hoping there was some automated way that I did not know about..

What tables which will link Ledger to Legal Entity?

I am looking for the scripts to get all the Legal Entity under specific Ledger. In my example, I want to get all the Legal Entity which belongs to "ABC" Ledger. But I do not know what tabes will link from Ledger to Legal Entity.
SELECT GL.NAME LEDGER,GL.LEDGER_ID LEDGER_ID,
glc.configuration_id,
GLCD.OBJECT_NAME
FROM GL_LEDGERS GL,
GL_LEDGER_CONFIGURATIONS GLC,
GL_LEDGER_CONFIG_DETAILS GLCD
WHERE GL.NAME = GLC.NAME
AND GLC.CONFIGURATION_ID = GLCD.CONFIGURATION_ID
AND GLCD.OBJECT_TYPE_CODE ='LEGAL_ENTITY'
AND GL.NAME ='ABC'
>
Please kindly advice.

Hi,
Please refer the below view, it gives you the reference between LE and Ledger.
GL_LEDGER_LE_BSV_SPECIFIC_V
Regards,
Yuvaraj.C

I've already changed email for my apple id more than 6 months. But 2-3 months ago until now I've recieved and email to ask apple id confirmation from me. I never confirm anything because I don't know,the link's attached, it's legal or illegal.

Dear Apple support team,
I've already changed email for my apple id more than 6 months. But 2-3 months ago until now I've recieved and email to ask my apple id confirmation from me about 6-8 emails. I never confirm anything because I don't know,the link's attached, it's legal or illegal.
The latest link (just be sent to my email 1 hr. ago) : http://www.smartpixeladv.com/proma/Login/index.html
Text is:
Dear Customer,
We recently noticed an unusual activity in your iTunes account. Please complete the process to confirm your
informations.
Confirm Now>
This link will expire three days after this email was sent.
If you don’t make this request, your account will be blocked for security reasons.
Apple Support
In my opinion, i think "http://" should be "https://" right? Or Apple should show the link on your website that we can find, re- check and click by ourselve. Or Apple should do "How to confirm apple id" on your main page. ( in fact i'm not sure you already done "How to" on your website yes or not, because I cannot find it)
The apple id is sensitive security, it's concerned personal security and any credit card payment so please understand me that's why i must to interrupt your team to help me to solve this problem. I'm scared my account will be blocked. Please advice me.
Wassa. (BKK)

It is a phishing attempt to get your Apple ID and Password.
You should forward it to Apple : [email protected]

Project Professional 2010 and pwa hangs when opening a linked project from PWA on Project Server 2010

When I open a linked project in Project Professional 2010 from PWA, Project Professional 2010 hangs with the "Links Between Projects ..." dialog box open. Unable to move or close the dialog box. Unable to move or close Project Professional
2010. The PWA tab on internet explorere is frozen and unable to access although other tabs in IE are accessible. End up having to reboot to close down project or force the process to end. I suspect a hidden dialog box is the culprit maybe
the scheduling conflict dialog box but am unable to access or switch and cannot confirm that there is another dialog box.
Has anybody else experienced this problem?
Thanks,
Julie

I have seen it hang when trying to open a project schedule even with no external links.
Project 2013 Pro, Link to schedule is on a PWA on a Project 2007 server.
If Project 2013 is open before clicking on the link, there is a long delay and the project schedule opens up in the web tab where the link was selected. If Project 2013 is not open, it just hangs and has to be shut down via the task manager.
No idea why. I can create a link to the shared volume and that works OK. But if I actually try to open MS Project by clicking on the link to a .mpp file it never opens in MS Project.
Mike

Legal Entity and Operating Unit Setup

Hi,
we are in a process of implementing Oracle Financials R12.1.3 to a group of company (Ex:"A").
That parent company ("A") associates with another three subsidiaries (Ex: A1, A2 and A3). All these four companies can share the same ledger and operating in one country.
So I'm with bit confusion whether It can use One Legal Entity with four operating units or do we have to create four legal entities?
Awaiting for clarifications and Thanks / Lathika

Hi All,
You have to think beyond application functionality, if there these 3 subsidiaries are registered with different name under local governance law then you should create separate Legal entity for each company or subsidiary.
Regards,
Abdul Hafeez

Re-link Assets and Place Assets Folder Navigation

Can you PLEASE fix the bug in Muse that causes the folder to reset (don't know if I'm explaining this clearly) when re-linking assets, and placing assets. To clarify, when I re-link an asset in Adobe Muse it defaults to 'My Computer' instead of the last folder used. This is occasionally happening when placing assets as well. It is EXTREMELY frustrating, and VERY disruptive to the workflow having to navigate to the same folder OVER and OVER and OVER. Indesign does not have this issue, can you not have this work in the same manner? (Actually until an dAdobe Air update last year this was not an issue.) It need s to be fixed IMMEDIATELY, before any new 'paralax scrolling' or such is introduced.
Thank You and I hope I can garner support from other users on this issue.

Here's how ID works with links:
First, the links in the file are absolute paths, meaning they refer to a particular location. If that location is acessible, ID will find the link and all is well. If the location is not acessible (on your colleague's hard drive, for example) ID will look for the links first in the current folder from which the .indd file was opened, and if nothing is found there, in any subfolders.
But why are you both relinking? Do you both need to work with the links for output? Since CS4 there has been a Preference under File Handling that allows you to choose whether or not to find and update links when opening files, and it seems most likely to me that one of you should be ignoring missing and modified links and jut getting to work.

Linking Project to Asset and Legal Entity

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for