Load Balancing vs PQ processes accros RAC nodes

I have following config.
•     3 node RAC (10.2.0.3 on RHEL)
•     All services (ERP, CRM, MISC and many more) configured for symmetric load-balance. i.e. Load balance across nodes.
•     Each node has Instance_group set to run all the above services. Parallel instance group set to same as service name at the session level.
•     PQ is enabled at the table level for some of the large tables with degree of 4.
Issue :
•     Quite often, QC gets spawned on the one node , but all the slaves gets spawned on a different node. This overloads the interconnect and slow down the fetch when result set is large.
Question :
How do I make all PQ processes (slaves + QC ) to go on the same node ? Is it possible to do without changing the load balancing scheme?

What is your interconnect configuration? Single Gig-E? What number is "large"? What do you do with large result sets? Spool them out?It’s GigE. Mostly extract of Multi-Million rows i.e. spool. Other with similar volumes goes to ETL server for complex downstream processing that subsequently gets fed to other targets.
In order to get this behavior you need to have an instance groups that only contains one node each, then change your parallel_instance_group to be that group.Yes. I have been told that by Timur as well with those two links. The links were helpful to understand the mechanics of Parallel Instance Group. In that link ( Part 2 ) mentions that it’s symmetric load balancing but I see he’s not load balancing connection across the both the nodes as he connects to specific nodes. See below excerpts from his blog site. Did I missed or mis-understood anything there?
Tnsnames.ora: (unchanged)
node1-only =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = node1)(PORT = 1521))
(LOAD_BALANCING=NO)
(CONNECT_DATA =
(SERVICE_NAME= nodetaf1)
(SID = EMDWH1)
(SERVER = DEDICATED)
$ sqlplus mylogin/mypass@node1-only
alter session set parallel_instance_group=’IG1′;
select /*+ full(orders_part) */ count(*) from orders_part;
QCSID Inst Group Set PROGRAM
984 1 1 1 oracle@node1 (P000)
984 1 1 1 oracle@node1 (P004)
984 1 1 1 oracle@node1 (P002)
984 1 1 1 oracle@node1 (P005)
984 1 1 1 oracle@node1 (P006)
984 1 1 1 oracle@node1 (P001)
984 1 1 1 oracle@node1 (P007)
984 1 1 1 oracle@node1 (P003)
984 1 sqlplus@node1 (TNS V1-V3)In my case , I need connections to be load balanced across all 3 nodes and have all slaves to stay on the same node as QC ( where it gets connected to.. i.e. it could be any of the 3 nodes ). Here is my scenario in detail.
ERP =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS_LIST =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = myvip1)(PORT = 1521))
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = myvip2)(PORT = 1521))
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = myvip3)(PORT = 1521))
(LOAD_BALANCE = yes)
(CONNECT_DATA =(SERVICE_NAME = S_ERP)(FAILOVER_MODE =(TYPE = SELECT)(METHOD = BASIC)(RETRIES = 180)(DELAY = 5))
(SERVER = DEDICATED)
Service S_ERP has been created to  run on each node with Load balance on (server side, REMOTE_LISTENER has been set up on each node )
srvctl add service -d ERPCRMP -s -r  rac1, rac2, rac3….All the session makes connection with above TNS entry. Now how do I set up Instance group so that my connection goes to any of the 3 nodes and slaves are restricted on the same node as QC.
Do I have to set something like this?
Node 1:
INSTANCE_GROUP= IG01
PARALLE_INSTANCE_GROUP=IG01
Node 2:
INSTANCE_GROUP=IG02
PARALLEL_INSTANCE_GROUP=IG02
And so on for the 3rd node.

Similar Messages

  • Load balancing and transparent failover in RAC 11g

    Hi,
    The only way to configure load balancing and transparent failover in RAC 11 g R2 is using the clauses LOAD_BALANCING and FAILOVER on the tnsnames.ora of application server. Is that correct?

    If the database is admin-managed, I shall suggest that rather than playing with the remote_listener parameter , set one service as preferred for one instance.For the other service, let it be preferred on both the nodes. The service with just one instance as Preferred won't be able to use loab-balancing as there is just one instance available for its disposal.
    HTH
    Aman....

  • Load balancing in the process chains

    HI friends
    I have 6 subchains in 1 metachain . we are facing a problem  where we have to 2 servers . but when we run the process chains they are  occuping all the DIA process  in only one server . the other server is empty . so is there a way  that we can do the load balancing in the process chains . so that the process chains can occupy all the resources in both servers than only one . please do reply . this is very important . thankyou  for all your replies .
    *Points will be rewarded *.

    Hi,
    check this out: https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/com.sap.km.cm.docs/oss_notes/sdn_oss_bc_ccm/~form/handler
    additionally some information.
    You can specify a server on which the chain will run, but this is not really load balancing. Load balancing must be set up by a basis person.
    regards
    Siggi

  • Oracle Applications 11i Load Balancing does not work with RAC one Node

    Hi all,
    Could you help me to resolve this issue.
    Architecture environment is :
    - One APPS tier node
    - Two nodes Oracle Database Appliance (Primary node 1 holds INSTANCE_1 et Secondary node is configurured to holds INSTANCE_2), i.e RAC one Node.
    - The primary node have instance_name SIGM_1 and the secondary node have instance_name SIGM_2, but in RAC one node, the secondary instance is not alive.
    We convert our EBS 11i environment to RAC following note ID Using Oracle 11g Release 2 Real Application Clusters with Oracle E-Business Suite Release 11i [ID 823586.1].
    When testing Database failover, Oracle Applications 11i load balancing does not work anymore.
    The root cause is that, when the primary node of the Rac one node is down, the INSTANCE_NAME_1 is automaically relocating to the surviving node,.
    During test failover, we imagine that when the primary node goes down, the secondary node start or relocate database with instance_name SIGM_2, and in that case the Oracle Applications load balancing works.
    Currently, when the primary node goes down, the instance_name SIGM_1 is relocated on the secondary node, which cause failure of Oracle Applications Load Balancing.
    Thank you for your advice.
    Moussa

    This is something I observed a long time ago for Safari (ie: around version 1). I'm not sure this is Safari, per se, but OpenSSL that is responsible for the behavior. I'm pretty sure Chrome does this and I've seen some Linux browsers do it.
    What I have done at the last two companies I've worked for is recommend that our clients do not use SSL SessionID as the way of tracking sticky sessions on web servers, but instead using IP address. This works in nearly all cases and has few downsides. The other solution is to use some sort of session sharing on your web servers to mitigate the issue (which also means that your web servers aren't a point of failure for your users' sessions). (One of the products I supported had no session information stored on the web servers, so we could safely round-robin requests, the other product could be implemented with a Session State Server... but in most cases we just used IP address to load balance with). The other solution is to configure your load balancer to terminate the SSL tunnel. You get some other benefits from this, such as allowing your load balancer to reduce the number of actual connections to the web servers. I've seen many devices setup this way.
    One thing to consider through this is that - due to the way internet standards work - this really can't be termed a bug on anyone's part. There is no guarantee in the SSL/TLS standards that a client will return the same SSL Session ID for each request and there is not requirement that subsequent requests will even use the same tunnel. Remember, HTTP is a stateless protocol. Each request is considered a new request by the web server and everything else is just trickery to try and get it to work the way you want. You can be annoyed at Safari's behavior, but it's been this way for over 5 years by my count, so I don't expect it to change.

  • Load balancing for specific services in RAC

    Hi,
          I have a two node RAC database 11gR2 version.I am planning to create 2 services for the database.For one of the services I dont want to enable server side load balancing and for the other one I want to enable load balancing.Will the following setting work
    services:
    srv1  --  load balancing not to be enabled
    srv2 --  load balancing to be enabled
    DB configuration:
    For srv1 I will not use SCAN ip and I will connect using the vip of the servers.
    For srv2 I will use SCAN ip and i will set the remote_listener(to SCAN:port) parameter and local listener parameter accordingly.
    Will this serve my purpose
    Thanks
    Sekar

    If the database is admin-managed, I shall suggest that rather than playing with the remote_listener parameter , set one service as preferred for one instance.For the other service, let it be preferred on both the nodes. The service with just one instance as Preferred won't be able to use loab-balancing as there is just one instance available for its disposal.
    HTH
    Aman....

  • Load balancing is not happening on RAC (oracle 11g Rel 2) on Linux 5.1

    Hi,
    Load balancing is not happening on Oracle 11g RAC. We have defined the SCAN listener and confured the TNS accordingly. Still we get the load maximum on node2 and less load on Node1 or vice versa. Please suggest me what to do?

    This is not the right forum to ask this question.
    regards

  • Enabling server-side load balancing with Oracle 10g RAC

    Hi, all.
    I created a RAC database on vmware by using DBCA.
    By default, remote_listener and tnsname.ora have been configured.
    The followings are part of dba_services from my RAC database.
    NAME, GOAL, ENABLED, CBL_GOAL
    SYS$BACKGROUND NONE NO SHORT
    SYS$USERS NONE NO SHORT
    DEVDB NO LONG
    By default(created by DBCA), server-side load balancing is enabled for
    the RAC database, DEVDB??
    --> GOAL of DEVDB is null, but CBL_GOAL IS LONG.
    After creating a RAC db by using "DBCA", do I need to do something
    for server-side load balancing??
    If so what I need to do?? How can I test it??
    And what is beneficial in enabling server-side loadbalancing ??
    Is it good in the real world??
    Thanks for reading.
    Best Regards.
    Message was edited by:
    user507290

    [urgent] 10gR2 RAC Load Balancing Configuration (client and server side)!!
    [urgent] 10gR2 RAC Load Balancing Configuration (client and server side)!!
    Virag

  • JDBC load balancing with non RAC replicated instances

    Hi,
    The thin JDBC load balancing feature only works with RAC clusters or it can be used with two non RAC replicated instances using the same service name?
    Thanks,
    Ezio.

    Thank you Douglas for your time.
    I assumed the first case (database connection load balancing). I thought that the listener would do the load balancing and failover trick. So, I configured the JDBC connection as follow:
    String MM_loadBalance1_DRIVER = "oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleDriver";
    String MM_loadBalance1_USERNAME = "scott";
    String MM_loadBalance1_PASSWORD = "tiger";
    String MM_loadBalance1_STRING = "jdbc:oracle:thin:@(DESCRIPTION=" +
    " (LOAD_BALANCE=on) (FAILOVER=on)"+
    " (ADDRESS_LIST="+
    " (ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=test1) (PORT=1521))"+
    " (ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=TCP)(HOST=test2)(PORT=1521)))"+
    " (CONNECT_DATA=(SERVICE_NAME=test)))";
    Driver DriverRecordset1 = (Driver)Class.forName(MM_loadBalance1_DRIVER).newInstance();
    Connection ConnRecordset1 = DriverManager.getConnection(MM_loadBalance1_STRING,MM_loadBalance1_USERNAME,MM_loadBalance1_PASSWORD);
    But, when one of the instances was down (test1), the connection failed, it didn't failed over to the other instance (test2).
    So I wondered if it failed due to some misconfiguration issue or because it only works with RAC instances...

  • Load Balancing in RAC

    If you have 2 node cluster , you have configured Node 1 as Preferred instance and Node 2 as available.
    According to Oracle , the service will always run on a preferred instance and will relocate to available instance in case of preferred node failure.
    Also you have server side load balancing, as per documentation the service will relocate on available instance if the preferred node crashes.
    Question: How will Oracle take care of Load Balancing , since the service on available node will only run if the preferred node crashes. Since the service is not running on Node 2 (available instance) ? How will oracle distribute the connections among the nodes?

    The answer to your question depends one the configuration of your Oracle Net Services, Whether you have configured connection load balancing or server side load balancing. Oracle will only balance the workload among the database instance running the service. By default Oracle starts the service on prefered node and in your case you have configured only one preferred database instance for your service and at a time service will run on one node only so Oracle does not have any options to distribute the workload even if you have configured the server side load balancing for the services using the service level goals.
    To explain it further, consider you have 3 node cluster. The database instance on first and second node are preferred instances for the net service and service-level goals are defined for server side load balancing.
    Now suppose second node fails and Oracle relocates the service to third node. Because Oracle is aware about the services running in the cluster even the relocated services (You should read about LOCAL_LISTENER and REMOTE_LISTENER to understand how Oracle register services with listeners on other cluster nodes) thats why using the load balancing advisory Oracle decides, which node the new database connection should be connected.

  • ISE 1.3 Load Balancing

    Hello,
    I've got 4x ISE appliance, 2x Administration and 2x PSN
    1 Administration primary / Monitoring secondary
    2 Policy Service Node
    3 Administration secondary / Monitoring Primary
    4 Policy Service Node
    Both PSN's are in the same Node Group... ISE is working fine, but it's not load balancing profiling, Corp WLAN is getting profiled by PSN 2 and guest WLAN is getting profiled by PSN 4... Is there a way to make both WLAN's to get profiled by random PSN? Like a load Balancer?
    BR,
    Emerson

    Hi Emerson-
    Do you have a load balancer? If you do you can load balance the sessions between the ISE nodes located in the node group. If not you could do Anycast based profiling. Check this link out that goes over all of the different options that you have:
    http://www.alcatron.net/Cisco%20Live%202013%20Melbourne/Cisco%20Live%20Content/Security/BRKSEC-3040%20%20Advanced%20ISE%20and%20Secure%20Access%20Deployment.pdf
    I hope this helps!
    Thank you for rating helpful posts!

  • Load balancing across multiple application servers not working with JCo RFC

    We have a problem where inbound messages to the Mapping Runtime engine (ABAP -> J2EE) are not load balanced over application servers. However, load balancing does take place across server nodes within one application server.
    Our system comprises of the following:
    Central Instance (2 X server nodes)
    Database Instance
    2 X Dialog Instances (with 2 X server nodes each)
    The 1st application server that starts is usually the one that is used for inbound messaging.
    We have looked at the sap gateway configuration and have tried various options without much luck:
    i.e.: local gateways vs. one central gateway, load balancing type by changing parameter gw/reg_lb_level, see: http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/bb/9f12f24b9b11d189750000e8322d00/frameset.htm
    Here are our release levels:
    SAP_ABA     700     0012     SAPKA70012
    SAP_BASIS     700     0012     SAPKB70012
    PI_BASIS     2005_1_700     0012     SAPKIPYJ7C
    ST-PI     2005_1_700     0005     SAPKITLQI5
    SAP_BW     700     0013     SAPKW70013
    ST-A/PI     01J_BCO700     0000          -
    Any help would be greatly appreciated.
    Many thanks

    Tim
    Did you follow the guide here:
    How to Scale Up SAP Exchange Infrastructure 3.0  
    Learn what the most likely scaled system architecture looks like, and read about a step by step procedure to install additional dialog instances. The guide also walks you through additional configuration steps and the application of Support Package Stacks.
    https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/c3d9d710-0d01-0010-7486-9a51ab92b927
    We followed this guide for XI3.0 and PI7.0 and works successfully!

  • Could not retrieve Enterprise Global Template - Load balancer issue

    Hi,
    We have 4 Project Server 2010 servers. The 4 web servers are load balanced by networking team with sticky session configured.
    When we try to connect to the Project Server using MPP 2007 SP2, it fails saying 'Could not retrieve Enterprise Global template'. It works perfect when we point to a specific server by specifying the IP address for server name in the 'hosts'
    file.
    Earlier we observed some errors in the event viewer related to the SharePoint's internal load balancer for which restarted the 'Project Server Application' on each web server and it got fixed.
    Now, the only entries that we see related to load balancer are as mentioned below as Information (not errors).
    SharePoint Web Services Round Robin Service Load Balancer Event: Initialization
    Process Name: w3wp
    Process ID: 15080
    AppDomain Name: /LM/W3SVC/539065287/ROOT-1-130462463500778047
    AppDomain ID: 2
    Service Application Uri: urn:schemas-microsoft-com:sharepoint:service:ae7c7ee5c09b4e8198bdbb1ecb8c1c1b#authority=urn:uuid:9f626d347784423eb14bde4a1f4d13fc&authority=https://lonms12546:32844/Topology/topology.svc
    Active Endpoints: 4
    Failed Endpoints:0
    Endpoint List:
    http://lonxxx2532:32843/ae7c7ee5c09b4e8198bdbb1ecb8c1c1b/PSI
    http://lonxxx2545:32843/ae7c7ee5c09b4e8198bdbb1ecb8c1c1b/PSI
    http://lonxxx2546:32843/ae7c7ee5c09b4e8198bdbb1ecb8c1c1b/PSI
    http://lonxxx2566:32843/ae7c7ee5c09b4e8198bdbb1ecb8c1c1b/PSI
    Could the issue be due to network load balancer?
    Could the issue be due to Sticky session configuration on the load balancer.?
    How can we get to the root cause of the issue?
    Which logging category should we set to 'Verbose' that can give us some hint.
    Update: We tried to capture the requests through fiddler and observed that when fiddler is running on the client computer then the connection works perfectly fine even through the load balancer. Probably fiddler is reformatting the SOAP
    envelop of the web service requests the way it should before sending the request to the server.
    If we do not run fiddler and run some other similar tool (like Charles) then it again gives the issue and the request stucks at /PWA/_vti_bin/psi/winproj.asmx
    We ran Wireshark on the servers and found the following for that web service call:
    [TCP Previous segment not captured] Continuation or non-HTTP traffic.
    Please let me know if someone could provide any hint what can be done next.
    Regards, Amit Gupta

    There are several ways to configure your load balancer.   I would suggest that you work with the network engineer, the load balancer vendor and your project administrator to resolve this issue. 
    Basically you need URL to be resolved correctly.  Also, I don't believe PS2007 did a good job handling load balancing, so you may need to bring someone in good with IIS and see they can tweek IIS to manage the cache better.
    As I go back and look at your analysis, I think you should probably look at upgrading to Project Server 2013.  They made some improvement in load balancing and the management of distributive cache.
    I assume you have 4 WFE because you have thousands of project users.  Roughly how many  you have?  Over 1000, over 5000
    Have you tried to see if using two load balancing work?  How about just one front end.  I often see companies scaling SharePoint and Project server to extremes. 
    Michael Wharton, MVP, MBA, PMP, MCT, MCTS, MCSD, MCSE+I, MCDBA
    Website http://www.WhartonComputer.com
    Blog http://MyProjectExpert.com contains my field notes and SQL queries

  • Web Services Round Robin Service Load Balancer Event Endpoint Failure

    I keep seeing these errors in the UlsTraceLogs:
    SharePoint Web Services Round Robin Service Load Balancer Event: EndpointFailure Process Name: OWSTIMER Process ID: 3748 AppDomain Name: DefaultDomain AppDomain ID: 1 Service Application Uri: urn:schemas-microsoft-com:sharepoint:service:9b3095eda69947b299d2f873bbfee5ad#authority=urn:uuid:a01381a61b244525ab4fec30cde9dc5f&authority=https://ApplicationServerName:port/Topology/topology.svc
    Active Endpoints: 2 Failed Endpoints:1 Affected Endpoint:
    http://WFEserverName:port/9b3095eda69947b299d2f873bbfee5ad/ProfileService.svc
    what do these errors mean?

    ok, thanks, I'll have a look at that.
    Going back to my issue...  Since I stopped the User Profile Service on the Application server, now I'm getting these non-stop messages in the log:
    SharePoint Web Services Round Robin Service Load Balancer Event: EndpointFailure Process Name: w3wp Process ID: 6088 AppDomain Name: /LM/W3SVC/261708640/ROOT-1-130709594108226406 AppDomain ID: 2 Service Application Uri: urn:schemas-microsoft-com:sharepoint:service:9b3095eda69947b299d2f873bbfee5ad#authority=urn:uuid:a01381a61b244525ab4fec30cde9dc5f&authority=https://ApplicationServerName:port/Topology/topology.svc
    Active Endpoints: 2 Failed Endpoints:1 Affected Endpoint:
    http://ApplicationServerName:port/9b3095eda69947b299d2f873bbfee5ad/ProfileService.svc
    SharePoint Web Services Round Robin Service Load Balancer Event: EndpointFailure Process Name: OWSTIMER Process ID: 8304 AppDomain Name: DefaultDomain AppDomain ID: 1 Service Application Uri: urn:schemas-microsoft-com:sharepoint:service:9b3095eda69947b299d2f873bbfee5ad#authority=urn:uuid:a01381a61b244525ab4fec30cde9dc5f&authority=https://ApplicationServerName:port/Topology/topology.svc
    Active Endpoints: 2 Failed Endpoints:1 Affected Endpoint:
    http://ApplicationServerName:port/9b3095eda69947b299d2f873bbfee5ad/ProfileService.svc
    This time, the messages are referring to the same server - the Application Server.    In my original question, I should've differentiated the server names when I pasted the message.  Originally the message was referring to the Application
    Server and Affected Endpoint was referring to a WFE.   I'll edit my original post to make it correct.

  • Query on Clustering,Load Balancing and Dehydration in Oracle BPEL PM

    Hi,
    I had a Few queries on Dehydration ,Clustering and Load Balancing:
    1) In section 5.1 "Use Case for Asynchronous Web Services",insertion of a dehydration point is mentioned.What do you exactly mean by this.Can a dehydration point be inserted explicitly?OR we have to put a wait activity or something so that dehydration happens?
    2) If a dehydration point needs to be inserted explicity arent we assuming that the invoke-reply will take long?But this might not be the case always.Is is a lso possible that an asynchronous process is not a long running one.
    3) Can we configure administratively ,how much time the process (say 10 seconds or so)waits after which it gets dehydrated?
    4) Consider a load balancing scenario,where we have 2 BPEL PM's (PM1 and PM2) running on 2 different App Servers (SRV1 and SRV2)in an clustered environment.
    Scenario:
    1)We have an asynchronous process which makes a call to a human task activity.
    2)A request from client comes for this process.
    3) The load balancing server forwards it to PM1 on SRV1.PM1 processes the request and calls the human task.
    4) PM1 has not dehydrated the process.
    5) The response from the Human User comes back to the Load Balancer before the process is dehydrated by PM1.It forwards this response to PM2.PM2 searches for the Process based on the Cor-relation ID and does not find it.
    Can you tell me how this scenario is handled?
    I would be grateful if someone can answer these queries or direct me to some place where it is already explained.
    Thanks
    Dileep

    1) In section 5.1 "Use Case for Asynchronous Web Services",insertion of a dehydration point is mentioned.What do you exactly mean by this.Can a dehydration point be inserted explicitly?OR we have to put a wait activity or something so that dehydration happens?
    Insert a java snippet with "checkpoint();"
    3) Can we configure administratively ,how much time the process (say 10 seconds or so)waits after which it gets dehydrated?
    No, this is due to the performance of your database.

  • Load balancing / fail over

    Dear forum,
    Is there an other and more simple / "cheaper" way for load balancing / fail over then using RAC ? E.g. starting more instances againts the (same) database ?
    Thanks in advance,
    Michel
    Edited by: Michel77 on Dec 9, 2008 12:06 PM

    The answer would be highly platform and version dependent.
    On several platforms you have software implementing a 'shared nothing cluster'. This means you failover complete services to a second server, which is usually dormant.
    There is HP Service Guard, Suncluster, IBM HACMP, and Microsoft cluster, which are or can be configured as shared nothing clusters.
    For Microsoft there was or is, depending on version, Oracle Failsafe, on top of a MS Cluster.
    RAC can be configured in a shared nothing mode too. RAC itself is essentially active/active.
    On the other side, you can of course buy a second server, and use Dataguard to set up a standby database.
    For a physical standby database, which isn't enabled for more than 10 days, you don't pay a license.
    Setting up multiple instances on a single server is obviously not going to work. Those instances need to coordinate what they are doing. This is essentially the task of RAC.
    Hth
    Sybrand Bakker
    Senior Oracle DBA

Maybe you are looking for

  • LED in field of ALV(OOPs oriented)- Traffic lights in ALV filter popup

    Hi experts, Am showing LED in field of ALV(OOPs oriented)and when i click on  ALV filter for led field..it shows me Traffic lights in poup for filter.Please help me to get LED in filter popup also. Thanks, Sajay.

  • Problem while starting managed server using nodemanager

    Hi everyone, I am using WLST of Weblogic server 10.3, to automate the creation of domain, managed servers,JDBC,JMS resources etc.. and trying to start the managed servers using node manager. I have an environment which contains few domains. All the d

  • Downloadin​g ebook

    Could someone please help me.  What is the easiest way to download books?  I'm not computer savvy so I would need a step-by-step instruction or send me a link. I tried to download a free book this morning and I don't know what I did wrong.  Also, wou

  • Using iPod in Japan

    My son is going to Japan. I'm wondering if he'll need some kind of adapter in order to safely use the charger for his iPod Mini. Anyone have experience here? iPod Mini   Mac OS X (10.2.x)  

  • Printing Subcontracting Challan

    Hi, How to print the subcontracting challan. What are the settings for the same. As i am not able to print some subcontracting challan , what could be the reason. Regards, ASHU