Loading ACE Results to LA Key Figures

Hello,
I try to load Arccrual Engine Costing Results from DSO (0ACE_DS01) to Leasing Accounting Key Figures DSO (0FIL_DS04) but during the data processing I get Error 2 in update:
Cannot determine fiscal year/period for date 99993112 and variant.
Errorcode: RS_BCT_CRM_FIN006
Could somebody help? Thanx in advance

Hi,
Since your requirement is that the Component subtotals should pick up the last value/aggregate and that the Total Material result to be sum of the components, can you just try as below.
1)Create a formula on the key figure . In Aggregation tab select Exception Aggregation as Average and Reference characteristic as Component.Keep this formula hidden
2)Create a formula using the above formula. In Aggregation tab select Exception Aggregation as Total and Refernce characteristic as Material.Display this formula as Hours.
Thanks.

Similar Messages

BEx report -two different calculations for a result for one key figure how?

All,
Maybe someone could help me with the following, we have a requirement to setup for one key figure two calculations for result rows. One result (average) for one level, and on a higher level -grand total have a (sum), as for our business it makes sense to do it this way. We have setup average for this KF, we get correct results (see below values 7,5 & 6,5) however for the grand total (across multiple products) so for one level up we need to have a different calculation. How could we achieve this?
Here is an example:
location     product          inventory
AAAA     11111          5
AAAA     11111          5
AAAA     11111          10
AAAA     11111          10
AAAA     Result          7,5      ---> average
AAAA     22222          5
AAAA     22222          6
AAAA     22222          7
AAAA     22222          8
AAAA     Result          6,5       -
> average
AAAA     Result (across products)          14      ---> here I want to have a sum of averages

This could be achieve only IF you upload a hierarchy for product inventory with different levels, wherein each level show subtotals and finally grand total will be shown at the end of the results.

How can I show results in another key figure?

Hi everybody,
I am using BEx Analyzer 3.5 and there I have a key figure with the following entries in a table:
40
50
60
Now I want another keyficture next to the first one which shows me the result of the first one:
40 | 150
50 | 150
60 | 150
How is that possible in the query designer (formula) in BW 3.5?
Thanks everybody

Hi,
Thank you for your help! I tried it with two key values. But it worked just by one.
The other key value is the difference between two dates, for example 29 (29 days). It's not working with these key value. What can I do in this case? Should I can the value with the formular editor?
Thank you for helping me

To get rid of * in the total result of all key figures.

Hi all,
           I have one query and in that I have three characteristics and one key figure. and corresponding to each characteristics my key figures values are added. But due to different units of measure in the grand total a star(*) is appearing and the thing is that I cant change the design meas do not want to change the design.I want to get rid of this . Plz help me out in this I need to solve this urgently.
       query is like this:
characteristics                    keyfigure
p1             2010                      100
                                              200
                                              300
p2              2010                    200
                                              200
                                              400
p3               2010                   100
                                              100
                                              200
grand total                            900* units of measure are different.

Hi,
The asterisk (*) value is maintained in the Mixed values tab of transaction RSCUSTV4. You can replace the asterisk with any text you want to display in the report.
If you select Mixed values checkbox below, the numeric value from mixed currencies/units will be displayed in the report.
But please remember that, any changes you make in Transaction RSCUSTV4 is a Global setting and will affect all the queries.
NODIM is the better option as it will affect only the required keyfigures in a query.
Regards,
Hari

Results of new key figure depending on value of characteristic

Hi,
I have created a query with characteristic "Rating" and key figure "market value".
Char "Rating" has several values, e.g. AAA, AA, A, etc.
As next step I will create a key figure which should work out as follows:
If value of Rating is "AAA", then multiply the overall market value with 0,4,
if value of Rating is "AA", then multiply the overall market value with 0,3, ...
How can I do so?
BR,
Thorsten

Hi,
Make 3 restricted key figurs on market value restricting them with rating AAA, AA and A.
Lets say RKF1 for rating AAA
RKF2 for rating AA and
RKF3 for rating A.
Now you can use these 3 key figurs in your formula key figure which can simple be
RKF10,4 + RKF20,3 + RKF3*0,2.
In this way you are already sure that only one of the RKF's will have a value and depending on the rating it will be multiplied with the value you have in your logic.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Jadeep

Hide Key figures in report but show result

Hi all,
I have a query with GL Account in the rows and Fiscal Period and the key figures in the colums, so the key figures are displayed per fiscal period. One of the key figures I want to be hidden for every individual period. However I do want to display the result for that key figure over the different periods.
Any suggestions on how to do that?
thanks,
Bart

hi,
In the rows I have characteristic GL account and in the colums I have characteristic fiscal year/period and 3 key figures: a formula called 'mutations' and 2 hidden key figures called 'Total debit postings' and 'Total credit postings'. 'Mutations' is 'Total debit postings' -'Total credit postings'. Because Fiscal year/period is in the colums the mutations are displayed per period. What I want to be able to see is both the sum of the mutations over all periods and the average of the mutations over all periods.
best regards,
bart

Changing key figure values in DSO/Cube

Experts,
I have a DSO and a Cube and the data has been already loaded in to a amount Key Figure. By default it is 2 decimal places. I want to change the decimals to 7. I cannot delete data from the cube or the DSO.
Can you please suggest some ideas to do this.
I came accross this note 579342 which talks about realigning this but as I have not implemented this before, I wanted to get your thoughts on if this is safe to do.
Thanks
Yashu raj

Hi Yashu,
I did this with using system message board and I put message on EP tooo.
So you do a small R&D. Run this report and let me know too if amount data is reflecting in the cube or not.
Logically it should not but have a try?
Regards,
Mahesh

Exception aggregation for calculated key figure

Is it possible to have exception aggregation for calculated key figure in BW 3.5? As per Note 1151857, it is possible, however this note applies to BI 7.0.
As per note 152638, it is possible in older version only simple ckfs like 'CKF = Base key figure'.
Is there any workaround to define exception aggregation for complex CKFs in BW 3.5?
My requirement is like this -
CKF = (sales quantity - forecast) %share (sales quantity).
Aggregation for CKF over time should be sum whereas, for all other characteristics calculation of CKF should be done after aggregation(normal scenario).
So, defining exception aggregation of CKF as 'Summation' over time should fulfil my requirement.
I can not use calculate result as 'summation' setting for CKF because of following design of report.
Report contains structure(characteristic)
Elements of structure are -
Last 3 months(April - June)
Last 3 months - 1 (Mar - May)
Last 3 months - 2 (Feb - Apr)
and so on...
When data is aggregated for each element of structure, base KFs will be aggregated and calculations will be done on that.
Changes in the backend are also not possible because, normal aggregation of CKF-alike in backend will be summation for all characteristics.
Is there any way in BW 3.5 to model such a scenario?
Thanks and Regards,
Anup Kulkarni

Sum of individual values of CKFs is not same as the Calculation on 'sum of basic key figures(result of basic key figures)'. - Yes, you are right.
I need to aggregate CKF over time as SUM. However, calculation for result of all other characteristics should be based on results of basic key figures and not the 'Sum of individual values of CKF'. -
What i understood is that whenever the time char is in row, then result should be simple on the sum what ur getting but when other char are there then it should go for calculation based on the sum of key figure.
If im not wrong in getting ur point.
How can two differenct activites be perofrmed on same key figure depending on the characteristic .....!. For this u have to think some other possibility or let somebody else update the thread.

Key figure definition in BEx gives "Error loading template 0QUERY_TEMPLATE"

Hi,
On a BI 7.0 system I try to run a query in the BEx Analyzer and after I have the result in Excel. I wants to see the key figure definition by right clicking in a data cell.
Then I get this error message after the browser has started up.
Error loading template 0QUERY_TEMPLATE
Notification Number BRAIN 276
Any ideas how this can be?
Kind regards, Bjarne

hi,
Please check the below path in BI and set the template "0ANALYSIS_PATTERN" there:
SPRO ->SAP Netweaver -> BI ->Settings for reporting and analysis ->BEX Web -> Set Standard Web Templates -> Ad-hoc analysis -> set the above template and save it.
check wether it works afterwords or not.
This is the standard web template called every time when we execute our query's.
Thanks
Dipika

Subtraction of two key figures normalized to result not working as expected

Hello SAP Community!
I am having problems with getting the right result from a subtraction of two KFs which are "normalized to results" which means the KFs really have values expressed as percentages. The substraction that should be performed is of two percentages (e.g.: 87.298% - 85.527% = 1.77%) but my report prints out the result as "number of units" instead (e.g.: 87.298% - 85.527% = 71,514.00 EA). The two normalized KFs actually "point" to two stock KFs, hence the "number of units".
In order to explain the problem I am facing please analyze below text:
1) Let's assume I have below data:
LOAD MONTH PLANT    MATERIAL HORIZON MONTH     FORECAST UNITS
200805         PLANT-A MAT-1            200805         510,235.00
200805         PLANT-B MAT-1           200805          74,240.00
200805         PLANT-A MAT-1           200806         438,721.00
200805         PLANT-B MAT-1           200806          74,240.00
200805         PLANT-A MAT-1           200807         356,981.00
200805         PLANT-B MAT-1           200807          74,240.00
200806         PLANT-A MAT-1           200805               0.00
200806         PLANT-B MAT-1           200805               0.00
200806         PLANT-A MAT-1           200806         510,235.00
200806         PLANT-B MAT-1           200806          74,240.00
200806         PLANT-A MAT-1           200807         438,721.00
200806         PLANT-B MAT-1           200807          74,240.00
2) Then, assume I have a comparison report, restricted by load month for two months May and June 2008 (filter restricted by two month variables) with FORECAST units spread accross columns for whole horizon (two months also in this case).
Material Plant                                 2008/06     2008/07
===================================================================
MAT1      PLANT-A
                   Base Units (May 2008)        438,721.00 356,981.00
                   Comparison Units (June 2008) 510,235.00 438,721.00
          PLANT-B
                   Base Units (May 2008)         74,240.00   74,240.00
                   Comparison Units (June 2008) 74,240.00   74,240.00
          TOTALS   Base Units                   512,961.00 431,221.00
                   Comparison Units             584,475.00 512,961.00
3) Now, let's suppose we want to know the proportions (%) of Base vs Comparison units, so
we normalize forecats to results an we get the below report:
Material Plant                                 2008/06     2008/07
===================================================================
MAT1      PLANT-A
                   Base Units (May 2008)        438,721.00 356,981.00
                   Base Units % (May 2008)      85.527%     85.527%
                   Comparison Units (June 2008) 510,235.00 438,721.00
                   Comparison Units %(Jun 2008) 87.298%     82.784%
          PLANT-B
                   Base Units (May 2008)         74,240.00   74,240.00
                   Base Units % (May 2008)       14.473%     15.702%
                   Comparison Units (June 2008) 74,240.00   74,240.00
                   Comparison Units %(Jun 2008) 12.702%     17.216%
          TOTALS   Base Units                   512,961.00 431,221.00
                   Comparison Units             584,475.00 512,961.00
4) Finally, let's suppose we want to know the deltas (differences) of Base vs Comparison
units, for both number of units and %. The report now look as below:
Material Plant                                 2008/06     2008/07
===================================================================
MAT1      PLANT-A
                   Base Units (May 2008)        438,721.00 356,981.00
                   Base Units % (May 2008)      85.527%     85.527%
                   Comparison Units (June 2008) 510,235.00 438,721.00
                   Comparison Units %(Jun 2008) 87.298%     82.784%
                   Delta base vs. comp. units % 1.77%       2.74%
                   Delta base vs. comp. units    71,514.00 81,740.00
          PLANT-B
                   Base Units (May 2008)         74,240.00   74,240.00
                   Base Units % (May 2008)       14.473%     15.702%
                   Comparison Units (June 2008) 74,240.00   74,240.00
                   Comparison Units %(Jun 2008) 12.702%     17.216%
                   Delta base vs. comp. units % -1.77%      -2.74%
                   Delta base vs. comp. units         0.00        0.00
          TOTALS   Base Units                   512,961.00 431,221.00
                   Comparison Units             584,475.00 512,961.00
5) PROBLEM:
In my report, the "Delta base vs. comp. units %" is not working as expected and
calculates number of units just as "Delta base vs. comp. units" does instead of calculating the % difference.
So my report looks as follows:
Material Plant                                 2008/06     2008/07
===================================================================
MAT1      PLANT-A
                   Base Units (May 2008)        438,721.00 356,981.00
                   Base Units % (May 2008)      85.527%     85.527%
                   Comparison Units (June 2008) 510,235.00 438,721.00
                   Comparison Units %(Jun 2008) 87.298%     82.784%
                   Delta base vs. comp. units % 71,514.00 81,740.00 <<<WRONG!!
                   Delta base vs. comp. units    71,514.00 81,740.00
          PLANT-B
                   Base Units (May 2008)         74,240.00   74,240.00
                   Base Units % (May 2008)       14.473%     15.702%
                   Comparison Units (June 2008) 74,240.00   74,240.00
                   Comparison Units %(Jun 2008) 12.702%     17.216%
                   Delta base vs. comp. units %       0.00        0.00
                   Delta base vs. comp. units         0.00        0.00
          TOTALS   Base Units                   512,961.00 431,221.00
                   Comparison Units             584,475.00 512,961.00
The formulas are:
a) Delta base vs. comp. units %
Delta base vs. comp. units % = Comparison Units % - Base Units %
b) Delta base vs. comp. units
Delta base vs. comp. units = Comparison Units - Base Units
The KFs
- Comparison Units %
- Base Units %
Are RESTRICTED key figures (restricted to Base and comparison month variables) which
are setup as:
1) Calculate Result As: Summation of Rounded Values
2) Calculate Single Value as: Normalization of result
3) Calculate Along the Rows
The KFs
- Delta base vs. comp. units %
- Delta base vs. comp. units
are FORMULAS setup to:
1) Calculate Result As: Nothing defined
2) Calculate Single Value as: Nothing defined
3) Calculate Along the Rows: user default direction (grayed out)
Thanks for the time taken to read in detail all of this. Long text but necessary to understand what the problem is.
Any help is highly appreciated.
Thank you.
Mario

Hi,
The subraction will be carried out before doing the normalization of your KF's. So, it is displaying "number of units". Create a calculated keyfigure and subtract the KF's and in the properties of this calculated keyfigure, change the enhancement as "After Aggregation".
I hope this will solve your issue.
Regards,
S P.

Key Figure Summation in Result Row with Cumulation Ticked

Hi,
I have a Bex question regarding the summation rows.
I need a Year To Date amount and a Period To Date amount in the report. However, there is no Year To Date key figure available in the cube. So in order to calculate YTD, I'm using the PTD key figure and have Cumulated box ticked mark in Bex.
All looks fine across columns per Vendor. But the results row for the Cumulative Balance is always equal to the results row for Period Balances. I believe this is because the same key figure is used, and it is only reading the amounts in the cube - not the ones calculated on the fly.
Does anyone know how to correct the results row for a cumulated key figure?
Regards,
Rhonnie

You have to create two restricted KF; one is PTD restricted to period; the second is PTD restricted in a period range from 01.yyyy to current period.
Hope it helps.
Regards

Key Figure doubles in value when loaded to data target

I have added a key figure to a copy of the standard inventory cube 0IC_C03. When I load the key figure it has the correct value in PSA but doubles in value when loaded to the cube. The mapping is one to one, why is this and how can I resolve? Thanks

Hi,
You might have done compression for BX and BF LOADS with MArker update
or
you have not yet done compression at any request.
With rgds,
Anil Kumar Sharma .P

Key figure correction in loaded data

Experts,
We had a bug in our datamart where in a particular key figure value was doubled throughout.
It has been identified and addresses but before the new transports go in, how do we correct this so that the reporting is correct.
Selective deletion will remove that entire record and then we ll have to wait for the fix to come in before we can load again.
Is there any other way we can take care of this issue?

If you are on BI7 than make use of remodeling toolbox
refer:
/people/mallikarjuna.reddy7/blog/2007/02/06/remodeling-in-nw-bi-2004s
Another alternate solution refer:
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/go/portal/prtroot/docs/library/uuid/f421c86c-0801-0010-e88c-a07ccdc69601

Key Figure's Result Summation and SUMGT

Goal: I need to capture the reports Results for KF1 and KF2 to use it in the same report for further calculations. However, the report should include into Results calculations only the records that have KF1 or KF2 with values greater than 0.
Potential Solution: Create a Formula that uses Function SUMGT (or SUMCT, SUMRT) on the desired key figures and use conditions at the query level.
KF1 Property:     Calculate Result As SUMMATION
KF2 Property:     Calculate Result As SUMMATION
Report with No Conditions:
Year      KF1     SUMGTKF1     KF2     SUMGTKF2
2001     10        70                         10        90
2002     20        70                         20        90
2003     0          70                         30        90
2004     40        70                         30        90
Result   70        70                         90        90
Report with Conditions:
KF1 > 0
or
KF2 > 0
Year     KF1     SUMGTKF1     KF2     SUMGTKF2
2001    10         70                        10         90
2002    20         70                        20         90
2004    40         70                        30         90
Result 70         70                        60         90
Problem: When Conditions apply the SUMGT (as well as SUMCT and SUMRT) do not take them into consideration and includes in its calculations the excluded records as well.
Questions:
1. How can I make SUMGT (or any of the other tow) return a result that take into consideration the specified conditions? For KF2 the Result should be 60 and NOT 90.
2. Is there any other way I can capture the Results for KF1 and KF2 when the above specified conditions are implemented?

I think No of repair days is a characteristic..
What you can do is create a formula variable with user input. User will enter no of repair days in it.
Now create a variable on no of repair days of type customer exit.
In the exit read the value of the formula variable and assign it to that variable.
Restrict your key figure no of completed orders with that variable...

Multiplying Cases by USD in Key Figure. How to get rid of CS in the result

Experts -
I have a formula where I am multiplying a quantity by an amount. Both have unit/currency attached to it.
For example : Quantity is 5 CS and Amount is $2.00
I have a formula Total = Quantity * Amount
Results are displaying like $ 10.00 CS. I need just $ 10.00 to display
How can I divide the formula by CS .. I have tried replacement path variable assigned value of 1 and unit of CS but that doesnt seem to work.. (unless Im using wrong settings)
Also adding a dummy key Figure = 1 CS for all records in backend objects and then using it to divide doesnt sound as the best solution
Can you please advice? Thanks in advance!

Hi,
Try this
Total= Quantitity* NO DIM( Amount) or take a dummy keyfigure of amount with out curreency.
Regards,
Sai.

Loading ACE Results to LA Key Figures

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for