Lock changed

Hello,
For the auditors I need the answer to the follwing question:
In the list of changes related to users accounts (produced via SUIM) I see the following entry:
User Name Date Time Changed by Action Old Contents of Changed Field Text New Contents of Changed Field Text TCode
TESTACC 05/23/2008 13:55:53 TESTACC Lock Changed 0 Not Locked 128 Incorrect Logon Lock KRNL
Action says: Lock changed, and Text said "Not Locked". Why Text says "Not Locked"?
Thanks
Galina

Silvia,
Thanks for your reply.
Here is the same line in different format where each field has its value next to it. I understand that user was not locked and then got locked due to multiple logins. What I did not understand is why Text said Not Locked. And auditors did not understand this as well.
User Name: TESTACC
Date: 05/23/2008
Time:13:55:53
Changed by: TESTACC
Action: Lock Changed
Old Contents of Changed Field: 0
Text: Not Locked
New Contents of Changed Field: 128
Text: Incorrect Logon Lock
TCode: KRNL
It makes sense now.
Galina

Similar Messages

Can't lock changes in System Preferences and Date & Time goes crazy

For some reason the items I lock in the System Preferences window become unlocked by itself. I have the password protect on, but it completey ignores it and unlocks the locks at a random time. This happens most frequently with my Time Machine prefs.
Also my Date & Time changes to whatever time it wants automatically. I have this password locked as well, but the computer seems to have a mind of its own.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance.

Boot with your install disk, launch Disk Utility, select the boot volume, and repair it. Boot back into the boot volume and try again. If you get the same behavior, move the com.apple.systempreferences.plist file to the desktop, log out and back in, and try again. If still no go, try a safe boot and see if it work s properly.

Lock change of ztransaction while using in migo

hi all,
in general how do we stop change of a document while it is edited in other transaction .
Ex : if PO number is in use while doing MIGO it will stop us editing in ME22n.
i have a similar requirement , we have a modulepool program ZMRN_CREATE, ZMRN_CHANGE jst like ME21n ME22n .
the number generated here is used in MIGO , how can i stop editing or change of MRN number while it is in use in MIGO screen.
Thanks in advance...Pl help in this regard...
Deepak.

Hi Deepak ,
Use this report in your program to lock and unlock your tcode in the background.
use SUBMIT statement in your current module pool.
REPORT Z_LOCK_UNLOCK_TRANSACTIONS
LINE-SIZE 80
MESSAGE-ID 00.
* Program to lock and unlock transactions
* Suvendu Swain
TABLES: TSTC.
DATA: LOCK_TEXT(30).
*SELECTION-SCREEN begin.
SELECT-OPTIONS: S_TCODE FOR TSTC-TCODE OBLIGATORY NO INTERVALS.
PARAMETERS: P_LOCK RADIOBUTTON GROUP A,
P_UNLOCK RADIOBUTTON GROUP A DEFAULT 'X'.
AUTHORITY-CHECK OBJECT 'S_TCODE'
ID 'TCD' FIELD 'SM01'.
IF SY-SUBRC NE 0.
MESSAGE E172 WITH TEXT-010.
STOP.
ENDIF.
IF P_LOCK &H3D 'X'.
LOCK_TEXT &H3D TEXT-008.
ELSE.
LOCK_TEXT &H3D TEXT-009.
ENDIF.
LOOP AT S_TCODE.
CALL FUNCTION 'Z_LOCK_UNLOCK_TRANSACTIONS'
EXPORTING
TCODE &H3D S_TCODE-LOW
LOCK &H3D P_LOCK
UNLOCK &H3D P_UNLOCK
EXCEPTIONS
FAIL_TO_LOCK &H3D 1
FAIL_TO_UNLOCK &H3D 2
INVALID_TCODE &H3D 3
INVALID_OPTIONS &H3D 4
TRANSACTION_ALREADY_LOCKED &H3D 5
TRANSACTION_ALREADY_UNLOCKED &H3D 6
OTHERS &H3D 7.
CASE SY-SUBRC.
WHEN 0.
WRITE:/ TEXT-001, S_TCODE-LOW, LOCK_TEXT.
WHEN 1.
WRITE:/ TEXT-002, S_TCODE-LOW.
WHEN 2.
WRITE:/ TEXT-003, S_TCODE-LOW.
WHEN 3.
WRITE:/ TEXT-004, S_TCODE-LOW.
WHEN 4.
WRITE:/ TEXT-005, S_TCODE-LOW.
WHEN 5.
WRITE:/ TEXT-006, S_TCODE-LOW.
WHEN 6.
WRITE:/ TEXT-007, S_TCODE-LOW.
ENDCASE.
ENDLOOP.
hope this will solve your problem.
cheers,
Suvendu
Edited by: Suvendu Swain on May 10, 2009 10:27 AM

X75-A Num Lock Change on Boot in Windows 8.1

Hello,
I have an X75-A System and with Windows 8.1 and when it boots clean from the off position, the Num Lock Key is off by default. Is there a way to change that to be on? I didn't see any settings in the BIOS or in searching on the boards, the settings that were suggested (Torn off Fast Save) did not work. I will not change the Registry Entries.

You can bypass the logon screen (and also the lock screen) if you like. We do that on all our PCs.
Otherwise, it's the registry fix that frightens you.
-Jerry

For those unhappy about the rotation lock change

Apple evidently heard all the complaints about the change in the rotation lock in iOS4. On the new ipad you can choose:
Customize the switch on the side of your iPad to lock the screen rotation or mute the volume. So you can lock your iPad display in landscape or portrait. Or quickly go from volume on to volume off. Just configure the side switch in Settings to toggle between your options.
This is listed as an iOS 4.3 feature, so it may be coming back to the original ipad, too, I hope.

*Totally unacceptable/___sbsstatic___/migration-images/migration-img-not-avail.png*
I want to get my rotation switch back through osmosis. I don't want no stinkin' upgrade to down load. AAUUGGGGHHHH/___sbsstatic___/migration-images/migration-img-not-avail.png
OK enough.

Passcode Lock Change

I don't want to put in my Passcode every time I swipe to use my iPhone 4G.
I have gone into Settings > General > Auto-Lock and changed it to 3 minutes.
However, the change in the setting doesn't seem to apply.
Am I missing a step someplace?
Thanks for your anticipated reply... b.

Thanks!
I was going into Auto Lock and never went into Passcode Lock.

Regarding locking changes to a ztable

hi guys,
i got a z table and this needs to be locked for changes ( do not maintain entries )in test server and production but it should allow user to maintain entries in development server. i have got 2 roles with me but how do i do this requirement,
Can any one please suggest me regarding this,
Thank you
Pavan kumar Ravikanti

Hi Pavan,
Go thru the following links... thought might help you!!
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_40b/helpdata/es/52/671374439b11d1896f0000e8322d00/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/52/67129F439B11D1896F0000E8322D00/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/4d/6d8939fb613f71e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
also there is means to restrict access to the specified tables by assigning it to a request and then having restrictions over the request. But this is done by the administrators ony.
if you could find a solution let us know!!!
regards,
Naveenan.

Keypad Lock - change unlock key sequence

Is there any way to change the keypad unlock key sequence as it is too easy to do by accident. I have found that there are a few different ways of unlocking the keypad other than the one stated in the manual, all only require two key strokes. The most annoying one is the center of the navigation key followed by 'OK' this is very easy to do whilst in a pocket. I think a key combination of at least three different keys would be better or simpler (and better for me) only unlock the keypad when opening the sliding keypad.
Any help would be appreciated.
Orange N80 - V3.0617.0.6 03-05-2006 RM92

can you not put a pasword on it ???
N96-1 + 8G SD~Software Version 30.033~Software Version Date 18-06-09~Type RM-247~P/C 0543713~T Mobile UK

Pascode lock change from keyboard to number only pad?

I am using Activesync with my work email and they enforce the passcode in order to unlock my phone. This is very difficult/dangerous while driving to unlock the phone with the tiny full keyboard and would be really nice if we had the option use use just the number dialer pad to input this pin. Is there any way to do this? If not apple please make this an option.

You're not addressing Apple on these user to user tech support forums.
Address Apple here: http://www.apple.com/feedback/iphone.html

On Button click change the button display text from LOCK to UNLOCK

Hi Freinds,
I am rendering a TreeByNestingTableColumn with two columns like: Name , Status as below shown. In The status column I inserted a Table Cell editor Button type and the button element property text mapped to the context attribute called statusButton and set the button name in the code to display as LOCK. When the tree renders all the vales are displaying in status column as LOCK. Now whrn the user click on LOCK i should fire the event and change the button text from LOCK to UNLOCK. The same way when they click on UNLOCK and i have change to LOCK. please help how to do this.
   Name                          Status
|> Employee1------------------LOCK (when i click on lock button here, his and under neath of him button status should
        |>Employee2-----------LOCK    change from LOCK status to UNLOCK)
               |>Employee3----LOCK
Thanks in advance.
Thanks
Srini

Armin,
Yes I removed the method and created the calicualted value as you suggested and I able to get the out put what i have asked.
My complete scenario is some thing like this, i able to complete upto certain level but not able to make it work for complete scenario, I appreicate your comments or advice for getting me the below output
I have a TreeByNestingTableColum UI rendering with three columns as NAME(node |>), STATUS(Toggle Button) and PLANNING (Text view) (developed based on sample tutorial Integration of a Tree Structure in a Web Dynpro Table.pdf)
I am trying to get this output:
From the sap backed i am getting flag value, based on that i have to render Tree UI columns NAME, STATUS(Toggle Button) and PLANNING (Text view). if the flag is null i have to show as LOCK and In Planning else Unlock and Submitted (please see the below picture for clear idea)*
if (statusflag = ""){
i have to show values in two columns like Lock ...Planning
} else
show values in two columns like Un Un Lock ...Submitted
One more thing is , If i lock a record at secound node level , then all the records should locked underneath of that node (it could be 2 nodes or 10 nodes) and then the status column values should change from lock to Unlock and Planning column values should change from In Planning to Submitted. where as when i Click on Unlock , only that perticular record (not node level) should changed from unlocked to Lock and planning is from Submitted to In Planning.
This is the functionality actually I am looking for.
Here the tree sample:
Name                        Status              Planning
|>M1                         Lock                 In Planning
   |>M2                      Lock                 In Planning
     *M2a                    Lock                 In Planning
   |>M3                    Un Lock                Submittd
Thank you.
Srini

Router reference keeps changing itself **even after locked

Greetings!
my partners ibook is possessed! We recently changed the router numbers when we got new setups here at the shop and we had to change the router number to xxx.xxx.xxx.3 instead of .1. Every time my partner steps away from his computer for some reason the configuration of his computer reverts back to .1. Every time he sits down to work he has to go through the whole configuration screen where he chooses "manually" and enters his IP address (which always satys the same) and the new router number and then changes it back to "with DHCP" and then the router number is .3. Then he clicks on the lock mechanism at the bottom left of the config screen to stop any further changes ... and then he can get on the internet. But then he walks away for half an hour and when he returns he cannot connect and he has to go through the whole rigamarole again. Why is this happening to him. He is 10.4.11 and it is an ibookG4.
How can we made the settings for that router stay at .3 and stop erverting to the .1?
thanks
YIPES :: kt

New problem now.
Now he can't get onto the internet if we set it up that way.
We change it to manually, we put in the IP address, and the router and he does not have access to the internet. He needs it to do ordering and the like so it is a thing he steps over to at least ten times a day.
BUT
if we go through the whole rigamarole and he changes everything in the "manually" screen and then he changes the drop down menu to "with DHCP" the router address stays at .3 and then he is able to access the internet. BUT it changes after a few minutes back to .1 and he has to do it again and again. He always clicks the "lock changes" button but somehow it still changes.
Is there a preferences pane I should delete somewhere?
kt

Locked thread issue

We encountered the following locked thread issue. Refer to the thread dump logs.
Any idea on the root cause of the issue? It seens to us that it is the weblogic app server codes that are causing the locked threads.
Will appreciate any advise.
"ExecuteThread: '0' for queue: 'weblogic.socket.Muxer'" id=22 idx=0x50 tid=329 prio=5 alive, in native, blocked, daemon
-- Blocked trying to get lock: java/lang/String@0x9a73910[fat lock]
at jrockit/vm/Threads.waitForUnblockSignal()V(Native Method)
at jrockit/vm/Locks.fatLockBlockOrSpin(Locks.java:1674)[optimized]
at jrockit/vm/Locks.lockFat(Locks.java:1775)[optimized]
at jrockit/vm/Locks.monitorEnterSecondStageHard(Locks.java:1311)[optimized]
at jrockit/vm/Locks.monitorEnterSecondStage(Locks.java:1258)[optimized]
at jrockit/vm/Locks.monitorEnter(Locks.java:2455)[optimized]
at weblogic/socket/EPollSocketMuxer.processSockets(EPollSocketMuxer.java:153)
at weblogic/socket/SocketReaderRequest.run(SocketReaderRequest.java:29)
at weblogic/socket/SocketReaderRequest.execute(SocketReaderRequest.java:42)
at weblogic/kernel/ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:145)
at weblogic/kernel/ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:117)
at jrockit/vm/RNI.c2java(IIIII)V(Native Method)
-- end of trace
"ExecuteThread: '2' for queue: 'weblogic.socket.Muxer'" id=24 idx=0x58 tid=331 prio=5 alive, in native, blocked, daemon
-- Blocked trying to get lock: java/lang/String@0x9a73910[fat lock]
at jrockit/vm/Threads.waitForUnblockSignal()V(Native Method)
at jrockit/vm/Locks.fatLockBlockOrSpin(Locks.java:1674)[optimized]
at jrockit/vm/Locks.lockFat(Locks.java:1775)[optimized]
at jrockit/vm/Locks.monitorEnterSecondStageHard(Locks.java:1311)[optimized]
at jrockit/vm/Locks.monitorEnterSecondStage(Locks.java:1258)[optimized]
at jrockit/vm/Locks.monitorEnter(Locks.java:2455)[optimized]
at weblogic/socket/EPollSocketMuxer.processSockets(EPollSocketMuxer.java:153)
at weblogic/socket/SocketReaderRequest.run(SocketReaderRequest.java:29)
at weblogic/socket/SocketReaderRequest.execute(SocketReaderRequest.java:42)
at weblogic/kernel/ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:145)
at weblogic/kernel/ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:117)
at jrockit/vm/RNI.c2java(IIIII)V(Native Method)
-- end of trace
"ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'weblogic.socket.Muxer'" id=23 idx=0x54 tid=330 prio=5 alive, in native, daemon
at jrockit/ext/epoll/EPoll.epollWait0(IIII)I(Native Method)
at jrockit/ext/epoll/EPoll.epollWait(EPoll.java:103)
at weblogic/socket/EPollSocketMuxer.processSockets(EPollSocketMuxer.java:156)
^-- Holding lock: java/lang/String@0x9a73910[fat lock]
at weblogic/socket/SocketReaderRequest.run(SocketReaderRequest.java:29)
at weblogic/socket/SocketReaderRequest.execute(SocketReaderRequest.java:42)
at weblogic/kernel/ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:145)
at weblogic/kernel/ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:117)
at jrockit/vm/RNI.c2java(IIIII)V(Native Method)
-- end of trace

This is standard behavior for the socket muxer threads. Only one of the epoll muxer threads is actually holding the lock at any one time. Here is the output of part of my thread dump on Linux with WLS 10.3.4 on JRockit on startup. The server is not hung up at all. Make a request on the server and take another thread dump and you'll see the lock change.
1st dump with ExecuteThread 1 waiting to get the lock from ExecuteThread 2
"ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'weblogic.socket.Muxer'" id=25 idx=0x58 tid=26836 prio=5 alive, blocked, native_blocked, daemon
    -- Blocked trying to get lock: java/lang/String@0xe82d6ec0[thin lock]
    at jrockit/vm/Threads.sleep(I)V(Native Method)
    at jrockit/vm/Locks.waitForThinRelease(Locks.java:955)
    at jrockit/vm/Locks.monitorEnterSecondStageHard(Locks.java:1083)
    at jrockit/vm/Locks.monitorEnterSecondStage(Locks.java:1005)
    at jrockit/vm/Locks.monitorEnter(Locks.java:2179)
    at weblogic/socket/EPollSocketMuxer.processSockets(EPollSocketMuxer.java:153)
    at weblogic/socket/SocketReaderRequest.run(SocketReaderRequest.java:29)
    at weblogic/socket/SocketReaderRequest.execute(SocketReaderRequest.java:42)
    at weblogic/kernel/ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:145)
    at weblogic/kernel/ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:117)
    at jrockit/vm/RNI.c2java(IIIII)V(Native Method)
    -- end of trace
"ExecuteThread: '2' for queue: 'weblogic.socket.Muxer'" id=26 idx=0x5c tid=26837 prio=5 alive, in native, daemon
    at jrockit/ext/epoll/EPoll.epollWait0(ILjava/nio/ByteBuffer;II)I(Native Method)
    at jrockit/ext/epoll/EPoll.epollWait(EPoll.java:115)
    at weblogic/socket/EPollSocketMuxer.processSockets(EPollSocketMuxer.java:156)
    ^-- Holding lock: java/lang/String@0xe82d6ec0[thin lock]
    at weblogic/socket/SocketReaderRequest.run(SocketReaderRequest.java:29)
    at weblogic/socket/SocketReaderRequest.execute(SocketReaderRequest.java:42)
    at weblogic/kernel/ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:145)
    at weblogic/kernel/ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:117)
    at jrockit/vm/RNI.c2java(IIIII)V(Native Method)
    -- end of trace2nd dump after the server servers a request with ExecuteThread 2 waiting to get the lock from ExecuteThread 1
"ExecuteThread: '1' for queue: 'weblogic.socket.Muxer'" id=25 idx=0x58 tid=26836 prio=5 alive, in native, daemon
    at jrockit/ext/epoll/EPoll.epollWait0(ILjava/nio/ByteBuffer;II)I(Native Method)
    at jrockit/ext/epoll/EPoll.epollWait(EPoll.java:115)
    at weblogic/socket/EPollSocketMuxer.processSockets(EPollSocketMuxer.java:156)
    ^-- Holding lock: java/lang/String@0xe82d6ec0[fat lock]
    at weblogic/socket/SocketReaderRequest.run(SocketReaderRequest.java:29)
    at weblogic/socket/SocketReaderRequest.execute(SocketReaderRequest.java:42)
    at weblogic/kernel/ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:145)
    at weblogic/kernel/ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:117)
    at jrockit/vm/RNI.c2java(IIIII)V(Native Method)
    -- end of trace
"ExecuteThread: '2' for queue: 'weblogic.socket.Muxer'" id=26 idx=0x5c tid=26837 prio=5 alive, blocked, native_blocked, daemon
    -- Blocked trying to get lock: java/lang/String@0xe82d6ec0[fat lock]
    at jrockit/vm/Threads.waitForUnblockSignal()V(Native Method)
    at jrockit/vm/Locks.fatLockBlockOrSpin(Locks.java:1411)
    at jrockit/vm/Locks.lockFat(Locks.java:1512)
    at jrockit/vm/Locks.monitorEnterSecondStageHard(Locks.java:1054)
    at jrockit/vm/Locks.monitorEnterSecondStage(Locks.java:1005)
    at jrockit/vm/Locks.monitorEnter(Locks.java:2179)
    at weblogic/socket/EPollSocketMuxer.processSockets(EPollSocketMuxer.java:153)
    at weblogic/socket/SocketReaderRequest.run(SocketReaderRequest.java:29)
    at weblogic/socket/SocketReaderRequest.execute(SocketReaderRequest.java:42)
    at weblogic/kernel/ExecuteThread.execute(ExecuteThread.java:145)
    at weblogic/kernel/ExecuteThread.run(ExecuteThread.java:117)
    at jrockit/vm/RNI.c2java(IIIII)V(Native Method)
    -- end of traceHere is a blog on this topic: http://jojovedder.blogspot.com/2009/05/weblogic-socket-muxers-are-not-stuck.html

How do i disable "change password" in "security & privacy"

Hi... i think something might be wrong... I have a standard account (for a child) that is locked down by parental controls by an admin user. I've locked changing the password - "Disable changing the password"... The lock icon is locked for users and groups in the standard account - so that works.
However if i goto System Preferences/Security & Privacy/General/Change Password it allows for changing of the standard account password and does not require the admin password.
Really? Can anybody else confirm this? How do I lock this also?
thanks in advance.

This isn't an answer.
You aren't the only one seeing this behavior. If you monitor the "More Like This" box (top right), other threads appear. Opening them usually displays other threads.
You might want to submit feedback to Apple so they are aware of the problem:
http://www.apple.com/feedback/

How can SAP be configured to prevent users from consuming locks?

How can SAP be configured to prevent users from consuming locks?
The issue is that we want to prevent users to use upto maximum locks and so that we will not get lock table overflow issue. I know that we can assign parameter "enque/table_size" a good amount of value. But it is not for any specific user.
Also want to alert in CCMS if any user reaches to its maximum speficified limit of locks.
Thanks
Gopesh

You cannot set a limit of locks per user. There are two ways to reduce/control the number of locks:
- change fewer records within one transaction
- cover more records with one lock using wildcards
Basically it is an application / development issue.
Best regards, Michael

User lock failed.SU10

Dear experts,
I locked a mass users using SU10, one of the user locked and immediately prompted for pwd change.
USER1          31.01.2011     09:15:02     ADMIN           Lock Changed     0     Not locked     64     Administrator Lock               SU10
USER1          31.01.2011     09:16:56     USER1           Password Changed     Long Password 3          Long Password 4          KRNL
USER1          31.01.2011     09:16:56     USER1          Lock Changed     64     Administrator Lock     0     Not locked               KRNL
Please suggest why this is happening in my SAP ECC 6.00, Kernal:7.00.
Regards,
Siva.

USER1 31.01.2011 09:15:02 ADMIN Lock Changed 0 Not locked 64 Administrator Lock SU10
USER1 31.01.2011 09:16:56 USER1 Password Changed Long Password 3 Long Password 4 KRNL
USER1 31.01.2011 09:16:56 USER1 Lock Changed 64 Administrator Lock 0 Not locked KRNL
Above log is showing that only lock activity was happened from SU10 and after that User changed his password from other opened screen. Did you kick off that user from the system immediate after locking?
Regards,
Nick Loy

Lock changed

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for