'Log in to System' option redirects to Development system in Change Request

Hi all,
We're testing ChaRM configuration. The issue is with the Change Request message. When set to 'In development', it doesn't show 'Log in to system' option. While when the status is ''To be tested', it shows the 'log in to system' option, but logs me in Development system rather login to Quality Assurance system.
I have double checked the logical component, and RFCs, associated to particular systems, and found them OK.
Any suggestion?
Regards,
Nayab

Thanks Rajeev.
Following is the scheduled condition (Task List with Open Group) of action definition LOGON
( " in Bearbeitung
     &CRM Service Process.ErrorFreeFlag& = X
     and    &CRM Service Process.User Status& [*] E0002D+HEAD
) " in Bearbeitung
or    ( " Erlaubte Status auch im Fehlerfall
     &CRM Service Process.User Status& [*] E0004D+HEAD
     or    &CRM Service Process.User Status& [*] E0006+DHFHEAD
     or    &CRM Service Process.User Status& [*] E0007+DHFHEAD
     or    &CRM Service Process.User Status& [*] E0005+DHFHEAD
     or    &CRM Service Process.User Status& [*] E0009D+HEAD
) " Erlaubte Status auch im Fehlerfall
&CRM Service Process.User Status& [*] E0006+DHFHEAD
or    &CRM Service Process.User Status& [*] E0007+DHFHEAD
or    &CRM Service Process.User Status& [*] E0005+DHFHEAD
or    &CRM Service Process.User Status& [*] E0009D+HEAD
What should be the case? Didn't get what to modify here.
Thanks!

Similar Messages

TestStand Activated Deployed System reset to Evaluation Development System

We have a test system which has TestStand with an activated deployed license. The test system has not been in use for a while and as some new units are due in to be tested, it was powered-on. The original mouse on the system had gone missing, so a new one was fitted instead. Windows saw this as a hardware change.
When TestStand ran, it loaded the TestStand Evaluation Development system instead of the deployed system.
Looking at the License Manager, there does not seem to be any way of disabling the Evaluation, (until it expires in 30 days), and using the deployed system, (which it shows as activated).
Any suggestions ?

Thanks for that.
I have deactivated and reactivated the deployment license and that stops the Evaluation box displaying when I select the icon for the Operator Interface for my sequence.
However, have noticed that the Evaluation Full Development Teststand is still there if I select the Sequence Editor, (at least for the next 5 days).
This is not a big problem, but I am concerned that in the future if someone uses a different mouse/keyboard then this problem will reappear.
It sound like a TestStand bug, as it should at least give you the option of not enabling the Evaluation Development system if the hardware 'changes'.

Full production refresh to development systems and Charm?

Hi SDN Community,
Where I work we have a policy of refreshing the development systems (ECC, CRM, APO, BI, SRM) on an annual basis with full production system data, HR data is subsequently wiped clean from the development system.
For each of our systems we have a development system, a QA system and a production system.
The decision to do these full refreshes was taken to ensure that developers and configurers can do decent testing in the Dev environments - prior to transporting to our QA system - to ensure that we have a reasonably stable QA system. Prior to the refreshes - QA was considered too unstable by our business to be used as a good test platform - the full D refreshes solved this problem.
We have recently installed SAP Charm (Change request management) which is a solution manager based product that manages the transportation of objects in change requests - attached to maintenance cycles.
During our first development system refresh we discovered that all open Charm projects (maintenance cycles) were placed into an unuseable status due to the refresh. This means we had to rebuild all of the Charm projects after the refresh - which took a considerable amount of time + resources and delayed project work. We don't want to be in this situation again for our next refresh.
SAPs response to us has been that they have no other customer that does full Development system refreshes - and also has Charm. I wonder if this is accurate, I think what SAP are saying is that they don't have many Charm customers... Is refreshing Development so uncommon?
We are considering products like SAPs TDMS - and alternatives (eg gold client) - but most of these appear a little immature - for refreshing complex system landscapes - such as ours and keeping everything in synch after the refresh.
My questions to SDN -
What do you do - do you do full refreshes to your D systems?
If not - what are the arguments against refreshing D systems (is this considered bad practice)?
Are there any other Charm customers out there in a similar situation to us?
How do you manage the stability of your QA environments and stop the transport into QA systems of untested changes - if your D systems are not similar to you production system
(note we have some 300 active users in just our ECC development system)?
Any suggestions / recommendations as to how to best proceed would be greatly appreciated.
many thanks in advance,
Julian Phillips
Edited by: Julian Phillips on Nov 11, 2008 2:33 PM

Thanks Naushad for your reply,
I wonder if D refreshes are less common - more due to the additional hardware costs incurred (disk space needed to store full production data is usually pretty large) to do them - than due to avoiding disrupting development - probably a bit of both.
I did not mention this - but in our refresh we do reimport all transports that we open prior to the refresh - which used to solve our problems - in terms of restoring active changes - but with SAPs Charm system - this approach does not work as the Charm projects are left in an inconsistent status.
We are now leaning towards introducing a 4th set of systems into our landscape - so that we have the following platforms:
Development ---> Pre QA ---> QA ---> Production
This approach will allow us to keep both the Pre QA and QA systems refreshed every 6 months or so - and our new Dev system - we will refresh very infrequently (every 5 years perhaps) if at all. We will tie the Charm system to our new development - and this system will then not be impacted by refreshes. This approach means additional hardware cost - but as it happens we have a few spare boxes - so this maybe our best bet.
The core reason for our refresh is so that we will be able to preserve the stability of our QA test platform - which for us is the critical factor here. If QA has poorly tested work in it - we run a higher risk of disrupting other testing and also of this poorly tested work reaching production.
When we used to have a development system as you described and just the single QA box - we experienced frequent instability in our QA box - due to poorly tested working reaching it - and this delayed numerous projects.
Does anyone else have a 4 box setup like this? Anyone else encountered this on an SAP project anywhere? Pros / Cons of this approach?
//Julian
Edited by: Julian Phillips on Nov 12, 2008 8:08 AM
Edited by: Julian Phillips on Nov 12, 2008 8:18 AM

System refresh activity in Development Box

Hi Guru's
I have requirement for system refresh activity in development system and i would like to know what are pre-activity required for this other than when compared to normal system refresh and also please share me any link or snote related to this
Regard
Mohammed Sayeed

Hi,
This is SAP business one system administration forum. Please find correct forum and repost your question to get quick reply.
Please close this thread here with helpful answer.
Thanks & Regards,
Nagarajan

Transporting into a new BW system from a shared dev system

We are currently in the process of setting up a new BW system in the same landscape as our existing one where both boxes will share the same dev system. Our existing one is used by many different applications and has tonnes of shared objects on it. Our new box will only be used for SEM-BCS and thus does not need everything else that the other box contains. Since many objects are dependant on others (attributes and such) I am finding it hard to get transports into the new system. There always seems to be something missing even when I try to just move a single object. I also seem to be having troubles with InfoObject Catalogs where they cannot be moved if the InfoObjects are not there and the InfoObjects a cannot be moved with the Catalogs not there. This is all starting to give me a serious headache.
Has anyone delt with transporting to separate systems from a common development system? What is the best approach to this to ensure we only move what we need to the new system?

The transporting is the same, however there are a lot of dependant objects that also need to be brought into our system. I'm looking for a way to minimize what I need to transport into our new system.
Collecting automatically doesn;t seem to be working for me since it does not collect everything I need and when I add that missing object I then seem to be missing another list of objects. It seems to be a never ending cycle.

CHARM activation check failing on "consolidation system for development system SSA-200 in project ZTEST2

Hello,
We are implementing Charmlite and want to activate in project landscape.
We are Solution Manager 7.1 SP11 and testing this scenario in sandbox.
Steps completed:
1. in sandbox domain controller, created two virtual systems and made 3 system landscape, where, I can release the transport and see it in QA system (Virtual system buffer)
2. The LMDB has been updated with Virtual system and in SMSY, the entries of virtual system shows up. The logical components have the client information.
Issue:
in /nsolar_project_admin ->System landscape -> change management, When consistency check is performed, we get error message saying
Virtual RFC is miising (I am guessing, it should be okay)
The logical component is incosistent (This might be the reason the CHARM is not getting activated.
"No consolidation system for development system SSA-200 in project ZTEST2
No track for project ZTEST2 with log. system SSA/200"
For me, when i look in satellite system, the consolidation system is a virtual system and it should be fine.
Please advise
Regards,
Durga PK Saitana

Thank you Karthik. Still the problem persists
I went through the blog earlier. I created l ABAP instance manually in SLD and moved into LMDB and can see the entry in SMSY. (I did not see any option of putting virtual flag)
We were trying harmonization of RFC from note 1384598 and since we had virtual systems, went with domain links.
After domain links, the virtual systems are read. the Dev ABAP system is not able to find the consolidated system. In the satellite system, I can release transport and move the transport.
Not sure, why this issue is persistent.

Unable to login in sap development system

When iam applying service packs, some has restarted the server. After restart the system everything is fine MMC is started. Database connection is ok. tp connection ok. Every thing is ok. When iam trying to login sap system I entered ddic user 000 client. Iam not able to login to my system.
The error which iam getting is Sid: SYSTEM MESSAGE SYNTAX ERROR IN PROGRAM SPAMS380.
I'am not able to login any client, with ddic,sap*, any user id.
Please give me the solution quickly.
I'am Applying Support Packs in Development system.

Hi,
try to execute this query..
logged in the Database Oracle level, as SysDBA & executed the SQL Statement
delete from <HOSTNAME>.<SID>.<object_owner>.USR02 where BNAME='SAP*' and MANDT='000';
after this bring down the instance and restart. then SAP will re-create SAP* userid and with default password "PASS" (case sensitive).
OR
login/no_automatic_user_sapstar=0
after restart the instance.
hope this info helps you!
Rewards points if helpful
Thanks
Pankaj Kumar

New Development System

Hi, just wanted to bounce some ideas off you guys.
We are about to create a new ECC 6 system initially a sandbox system for blue print then a Dev system.
My organisation as a global finance SAP template that we will use. So the steps would be a fresh install, then install the global finace templete, not sure how but will probably a system copy.
We also have another stream of work being undertaken in another part of the organisation which is all being done in its own landscape. We need to split out some of this functionality to use on our system (about 2000 transports).
I don't want to copy all of this work over to the Dev system probably from their QA system as it has a load of master / transaction data, but it will give everything we require OK we would need to some clean up work.
The other option would be to selct the transports that we require and apply them, sequencing will be a issue,
Ideally I guess the best solution is for all the work to be performed again in the new Dev system
Its a tricky one, I need the fucntionality but want to keep the system as clean as possible. The QA system will be built on the transports from Dev.
Any thoughts appreciated,
Thanks

Ideally I guess the best solution is for all the work to be performed again in the new Dev system
You will be right on this. Problem w/ a "easy" solution via transport is that you may run into cross development with the same object fighting eachother. This could result in unexpected behavior in the system, which would turn into a diagnostics nightmare.
We are currently in middle of upgrading to ECC 6.0. The plan here inhouse is to actually freeze all modifications for period of 1 quarter, allowing only production fixes only. This would minimize the number of transports that we have to manually consolidate.

New Development system copy from Production

Hi All,
Hope you can help me out here with some ideas.
We are currently planning to implement a new SAP BW Development system, and for this we would like to make it a 1:1 copy of our current production system. Meaning all from customizing, ABAP, workbench objects etc.
But what we do not want is all the transaction and master data in infoobject, cubes etc., we are only interested in the structure and objects. Therefore we can rule out "System copy".
My question is then, is there any other ways to do this when system copy is a no go? I know we can do client copy but then we will not get all the workbench / ABAP programs which we need.
Any ideas on how to do this?
Thx. in Advance

Hi Rasmus,
But what we do not want is all the transaction and master data in infoobject, cubes etc., we are only interested in the structure and objects. Therefore we can rule out "System copy".
Options 1: As BI objects are cross client , copying client will not solve your purpose 100%.
You can perform system copy and then clean up data in DEV
Option 2: You can create a new Development and then create TRs for required configuration objects and move to new development system.
Option 3: Use SLO tools to perform container copy without any data.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Deepak Kori

VISA Write differs between TS Development System and LV Run-Time Engine

Hi all
I made an application on LabVIEW to test BERs (Bit Error Rates), and I used VISA Write between two COM ports to exchange data.
Everything works fine using just LabVIEW.
Afterwards, I used TestStand to call my application (VI). The LabVIEW adapters from TestStand were set to Development System by default, and everything works OK!!
Finally, I needed to disable the development system, and set the LabVIEW adapters from TestStand to LabVIEW Run-Time Engine and I notice that the speed of the data exchange between the two COM ports decreased dramatically.
The only difference was the speed...because all the data (changed slowly in this case) arrived correctly on the other COM port too.
The symptom was the same as decreasing the baud rate...but the baud rate and all the other configurations remained the same. The only difference was the change between Develpment System to Run-Time Engine to notice this decreased speed between the exchanged data using VISA Write.
Any solutions for this?
Thanks in advance
Joao
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Joao,
you state that using the LV Developement System as execution platform for your LV code modules result in faster datatransfer between the COM ports than using the LV Run-Time Engine.
So i am pondering: Does this refer to TS at all?
Please check the following:
Run you communication using a sole LV application in LV Developement System. This should be fast. Now build an executable of this application and run that one. Do you see the same behavior?
If there is no difference in a sole LV approach, there have to be some settings in the TS approach making this slow. So please let us know:
Are there different modules involved in that data transfer (which in fact points to the reply Christophe made)?
What about loading/unloading options of the modules?
How big is the hierarchy of the modules, e.g. is it necessary for the RTE to load stuff the Dev Env has already in memory due to loading a lvproj.......?
Could you provide a simple example sequence+modules showing this behavior?
What versions of LV and TS are you using?
hope this helps,
Norbert
CEO: What exactly is stopping us from doing this?
Expert: Geometry
Marketing Manager: Just ignore it.

Error -17600 when switching from LabVIEW Development System to LabVIEW Run-Time Engine in Adapter Configuration

I receive an error message (code -17600) while loading my test sequence after switching from LabVIEW Development System (2009 f3) to LabVIEW Run-TIme Engine using the Adapter Configuration.
ErrorCode: -17600,
Failed to load a required step's associated module.
LabVIEW Run-Time Engine version 9.0.1f3.
When I switch back to the LV development system, everything is OK, and the sequence loads and runs perfectly.
My TestStand Engine Version is 2012 f1 (5.0.0.262).
I'd appreciate any help on this issue.
Roman

Hi Roman,
There are a couple of things you can try:
1) Determine if the LabVIEW RunTime Engine is corrupted in some way. Create a new simple VI with no sub-VIs, using the same LabVIEW Development system you used for mass-compiling the VIs. Create a TestStand step that calls this VI and ensure it runs correctly. Now switch your LabVIEW adapter to use the RuntimeEngine and choose the "Auto detect using VI version" option.
Check if the simple VI is loadable and runs without errors in TestStand.
If the step generates the same error, you should try a re-install of the LabVIEW development system.
If not, its most likely that there is some VI you are using that is not loadable in the LabVIEW Runtime Engine because:
1) Some sub-VI is still not saved in the right version or bitness. Open the VI heirarchy of the top-level VI that you are calling from TestStand and examine the paths of all the sub-VIs to check if they were in the folder you masscompiled and re-save any that are outside this directory.
Also, when you try to close the top level VI, do you get a prompt to save any unsaved files? If so, they could be the sub-VIs that are not saved in the right version. Save all of them.
Check if you are loading any VIs programatically and if these are compiled and saved in the right version as well.
2) There is some feature you are using in your LabVIEW code that is not supported in the LabVIEW RunTime Engine. To check this, add your top-level VI to a LabVIEW project and create a new build specification and create a new executable from this VI.
    Right-click "Build Specifications" and choose "New->Application(EXE)".
    In the Application Properties window, select Source Files and choose the top level VI as the start-up VI.
    Save the properties.
    Right-click on the newly created build specification and choose Build.
Run this executable (it will be run using the LabVIEW RunTime) and check if the VI has a broken arrow indicating that it cannot be loaded and run in the LabVIEW Runtime Engine.
You might need to examine your code and find the feature which is not supported in the LabVIEW RunTime and find an alternative.
Another thing i forgot to mention the last time around is if you are using 64-bit LabVIEW with 32-bit TestStand, then executing code using LabVIEW RTE from TestStand will not work since the 64-bit LabVIEW RTE dll cannot be loaded by the 32-bit TestStand process.
If none of the above steps resolve the issue, consider sharing your LabVIEW code so i can take a look.
Regards,
TRJ

Is there a way to activate the whole application in Non Development system?

Hi All,
Is there a way to activate the whole application in Non Development system? Using some BRF Plus Tool.
We copied a sample application and customized the same as per our requirement. The same is then released to Test System for testing. On Test system this application with all component is in non-active state. We re activated the application with all the component and released it to Test System. But still the application is inactive.
Application is a of storage type system and so cannot use changeability exit to activate on test system.
TR log shows imported with error. Below is the extract of the error:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
BRF+: Runtime client: 000 / target client: 400
BRF+: Object activation of new version started for 418 object IDs
BRF+: <<< *** BEGIN: Content from Application Component CA *** >>>
BRF+: <<< BEGIN: Messages for IDs (53465BA36D8651B0E1008000AC11420B/ ) Table 'Dunning Proposal Line Items (Table)' >>>
No active version found for 23.04.2014 08:14:10 with timestamp
No active version found for IT_FKKMAVS with timestamp 23.04.2014 08:14:10
No active version found for IT_FKKMAVS with timestamp 23.04.2014 08:14:11
BRF+: <<< END : Messages for IDs (53465BA36D8651B0E1008000AC11420B/ ) Table 'Dunning Proposal Line Items (Table)' >>>
BRF+: <<< *** END : Content from Application Component CA *** >>>
BRF+: Object activation failed (step: Activate )
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
BRF+: Import queue update with RC 12
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Errors occurred during post-handling FDT_AFTER_IMPORT for FDT0001 T
FDT_AFTER_IMPORT belongs to package SFDT_TRANSPORT
The errors affect the following components:
   BC-SRV-BR (BRFplus - ABAP-Based Business Rules)
Post-import method FDT_AFTER_IMPORT completed for FDT0001 T, date and time: 20140423011412
Post-import methods of change/transport request DE1K901989 completed
     Start of subsequent processing ... 20140423011359
     End of subsequent processing... 20140423011412
Any help would be appreciated.

Is IT_FKKMAVS part of the same transport request or was it sent already earlier?
You may have a look at the request if it was OK. Probably not.
Maybe in the meantime more requests reached the system that now have in combination solved the problem. What is your release and support package level?
Higher versions of BRFplus have a lot of automatic correction mechanisms built into it.
E.g. problematic imports are collected in an import queue. As soon as a request comes in that fixes any problems the after import processing for faulty imports is automatically redone.

For one Urgent Change during performing the Approval(chnging the status to 'To be Tested') system does not recognize any changes using the CTS WBS BOM in the development system. The transaction is therefore incorrect or the status was reset by the system.

For one Urgent Change while performing the one of the Approval before changing the status to 'To Be Tested'
We are getting below error.
The system does not recognize any changes using the CTS WBS BOM in the development system. The transaction is therefore incorrect or the status was reset by the system.
COuld anyone please help us to know, How it can be resolved?
We also have this below error.
System Response
If the PPF action is a condition check, the condition is initially considered as not met, and leads to another warning, an error message, or status reset, depending on the configuration.
If the PPF action is the execution of a task in the task list, and the exception is critical, there is another error message in the document.
Procedure
The condition cannot be met until the cause is removed. Analyze all messages in the transaction application log.
Procedure for System Administration
Analyze any other messages in the task list application log, and the entries for the object /TMWFLOW/CMSCV
Additional Information:
System cancel RFC destination SM_UK4CLNT005_TRUSTED, Call TR_READ_COMM:
No authorization to log on as a trusted system (Tr usted RC=0).
/TMWFLOW/TU_GET_REQUEST_REMOTE:E:/TMWFLOW/TRACK_N:107
For above error Table /TMWFLOW/REP_DATA_FLOWwas refreshed as well but still the same error.

If you are in Test System, you can use function module AA_AFABER_DELETE to totally delete the depreciation area (tcode SE37, specify chart of depreciation and depreciation area), After that recreate your depreciation area and run AFBN. But before you do that, have you created a retirement transaction type that limits the posting on your new depreciation area? If not create one.
Hope this helps.
Thanks!
Jhero

What is the difference between developement system and delivery system?

Hello Experts,
I have some questions regarding publishing the content on delivery system.
Could some one help me.
1) Can we use Development System as Delivery System?
2) Can we Publish a Site into Development System?
3) How to check whether the installation done in development mode or in delivery mode? I mean do we have any procedure to check ?
4) What are the Advantages of Delivery System over the Development System?
Note: I installed Webcenter sites11gR1 on Weblogic10.3 server and windows 7.
Thanks in advance
Rajendar.

Rajendar Raj wrote:
I got the answers.
1) Can we use Development System as Delivery System?
Ans:
Yes, a development system contains the same functionality as a delivery system. Conversely a delivery system doesn't have a contributor interface so it cannot be used for managing assets.
Not recommended and it also depends on the sizing of your environment and tuning. Delivery systems usually are architected with performance in mind, depending on the expected load, logs are minimal and usually Remote Satellite Servers are added. Important as well is that no content or any assets is created directly on the delivery system, you might run into unique ID constrains when you publish content from Authoring to Delivery, in your case Development.
2) Can we Publish a Site into Development System?
Ans:
Yes, you can.
Be careful this is not recommended, you can run into unique id constraints issues
3) How to check whether the installation done in development mode or in delivery mode? I mean do we have any procedure to check ?
Ans:
Look in the ominstallinfo directory, in the location where WebCenter Sites was installed. there is a file called omii.ini that contains installation-time choices and parameters. Look for the parameter "Development"
- true, indicates it was a Development type install. Advanced UI will be available, as will the Contributor UI
- false, indicates it was a Delivery type install. Only Advanced UI will be available.
4) What are the Advantages of Delivery System over the Development System?
Ans:
A delivery type install is more secure, as the contributor UI and some other editorial components are not installed. It also prevents editors from changing content on the delivery system by mistake.
In general Delivery systems are architected different, more emphasis on performance, caching and security.
Thanks and Regards
Rajendar.Regards,
Rodney

Transport Webi Reports and Web services as the backend of dashboards from BO Production to BO Development system

Hello Experts,
I am working on SAP BO 4.1. I have made several dashboards on top of web services ie;Web Service Method. I have 2 systems in BO ie; Development and Production Systems.The BW production system is connected to BO Development and Production both.
The Webi reports are made on top of BI BEx Query. From the webi reports, BI Web Services are made on top of which the dashboards are made further.
The Webi Reports, Web Services and the Dashboards everything is made directly in BO Production.
My question is, Can I transport the Webi Reports and the Web Services from BO Production to BO Development?
And If yes, will it have any other impact on webi reports, web services or dashboards?
Thanks & Regards,
Alfred Thomas

Hi Gill,
As per your reply,with the promotion managament i have make the web services again manually in Dev system...Right?
Is there any way possible that i can transport the webservices and the webi reports usind Query AS A Web Service Designer. And if yes, through this QAAWS will the WSDL or the URL required for the web services in the connection button in dashboards will automatically updated or changed as per the Development System?
But i am not able to enable the "Deploy to Other servers Option" in QAAWS.
Can you please help?
Regards,
Alfred thomas

'Log in to System' option redirects to Development system in Change Request

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for