Looking for a decent high quality case for the Omni10 Omni 10

For anyone looking for the best case for the Omni 10 then this fits perfectly and is the best match for this tablet currently
http://targus.com/uk/product_details.asp?sku=THZ200EU
In the UK, where I live, it is available from John Lewis

It appears that the Targus case has a cutout that would allow you to charge the device with the cover closed. The HP case doesn't allow for that.
I wrote a review here on the HP case. I wouldn't recommend it. I should also note that the HP store personnel chose not to make my review public...seems there's some selective editing going on there which means I will never trust any reviews on that site.
You can search here for my whole review, but basically the HP case has a couple of problems.
1. It's very heavy for a case.
2. The holes don't line up particularly well with things like the camera (no matter how many times you adjust the tablet and tighten loosent the velcro closure.
3. The aforementioned charging issue.
4. You can't have any cables plugged into the device while in Stand mode (probably also an issue with the Targus).

Similar Messages

  • Help - i recently made put together a high quality movie for a relative, it has taken me months to complete and it goes for a total of 9 hours and 43 minutes ,however, it won't let me export the video at all! please help - its taken ages to make it!

    Help - i recently made put together a high quality movie for a relative, it has taken me months to complete and it goes for a total of 9 hours and 43 minutes ,however, it won't let me export the video at all! please help - its taken ages to make it!

    9 hours??!
    Twice the length of a cinema epic?
    How are you expecting to distribute it?
    iDVD encoding settings:
    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?path=iDVD/7.0/en/11417.html
    Short version:
    Best Performance is for videos of up to 60 minutes
    Best Quality is for videos of up to 120 minutes
    Professional Quality is also for up to 120 minutes but even higher quality (and takes much longer)
    That was for single-layer DVDs. Double these numbers for dual-layer DVDs.
    Professional Quality: The Professional Quality option uses advanced technology to encode your video, resulting in the best quality of video possible on your burned DVD. You can select this option regardless of your project’s duration (up to 2 hours of video for a single-layer disc and 4 hours for a double-layer disc). Because Professional Quality encoding is time-consuming (requiring about twice as much time to encode a project as the High Quality option, for example) choose it only if you are not concerned abo
    In both cases the maximum length includes titles, transitions and effects etc. Allow about 15 minutes for these.
    You can use the amount of video in your project as a rough determination of which method to choose. If your project has an hour or less of video (for a single-layer disc), choose Best Performance. If it has between 1 and 2 hours of video (for a single-layer disc), choose High Quality. If you want the best possible encoding quality for projects that are up to 2 hours (for a single-layer disc), choose Professional Quality. This option takes about twice as long as the High Quality option, so select it only if time is not an issue for you.
    Use the Capacity meter in the Project Info window (choose Project > Project Info) to determine how many minutes of video your project contains.
    NOTE: With the Best Performance setting, you can turn background encoding off by choosing Advanced > “Encode in Background.” The checkmark is removed to show it’s no longer selected. Turning off background encoding can help performance if your system seems sluggish.
    And whilst checking these settings in iDVD Preferences, make sure that the settings for NTSC/PAL and DV/DV Widescreen are also what you want.
    http://support.apple.com/kb/HT1502?viewlocale=en_US

  • I have a Macbook Pro purchased brand new. I take high quality pictures for customers, these display perfect on my laptop but appear CORRUPT on a USB stick. What is causing this? I can't seem to fix this issue. PLEASE HELP!!

    I have a Macbook Pro purchased brand new. I take high quality pictures for customers, these display perfect on my laptop but appear CORRUPT on a USB stick. What is causing this? I can't seem to fix this issue. PLEASE HELP!!
    I really need this issue resolved it is driving me insane!!! How can the images appear perfectly fine on my laptop then when transferring over to a USB stick they just  corrupt!?

    Check out this site:
    http://osxdaily.com/2012/04/22/format-drive-mac-pc-compatible/
    That will show you how to format a USB stick for use on both PC and Mac.
    If the problem continues take it to an Apple store and have them check it out.
    >Also what s exFAT?<
    From:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ExFAT
    "exFAT (Extended File Allocation Table) is a Microsoft file system optimized for flash drives.[3] It is proprietary and patented."
    That first site explains it at length.

  • I'm looking for a high quality image of the flower in the iPhone 5 the website.

    There is a flower that is used in the apple website, for the iPhone 5. It is purple and yellow. I've been looking all over the web for it but cannot find an image of it that doesn't have a glare on it. I guess it is owned by apple, but I was wondering if anyone knew where I could find a high quality image of it. Unfortunately it is not included with the iPhone 5.

    Hi(Bonjour)!
    I see on photo to movie spec page that you can export in full 1920 X 1080 H.264 codec, a high quality format usable in FCE.
    http://www.lqgraphics.com/software/phototomovieoverview.php
    By the way, how do you deliver your HD sequence from your mac to your HD TV set ?
    Michel Boissonneault

  • High Quality Export for Youtube

    What are the best settings to get a very high quality export to upload to youtube? I am using final cut pro 6, with anamorphic dv footage - i'd like the dimensions to be 854x480 to be widescreen unless i can push it the full 1280. i haven't been happy with my uploads and usually see some pixellation, esp. in dark areas. the file sizes are usually like 400mb for 3 min. or so. i use compressor sometimes. i have something special that needs to look good and any advice would be greatly appreciated!!
    Message was edited by: derdav

    DV is always 720x480. Your 854x480 file is adjusted to display those 720 pixels in wide screen on a computer. DV pixels are not square. Computers only display square pixels. In this case, that's OK.
    ...unless i can push it the full 1280...
    This will lose quality, you are spreading the 720 pixels over 1280.
    For YouTube, upload either the original DV and let YT compress it or make a H.264 file in Compressor with the same pixel dimensions. Newer versions of Compressor have YouTube presets.
    [Link: Encoding for YouTube Using Compressor|http://www.kenstone.net/fcphomepage/youtube_compressorgary.html].

  • Advice for keeping high quality files for archiving

    I'm contemplating archiving here. I love reference files because they are pretty small in file size and don't compress. However, I have to worry that all my files will remain in the same exact place forever. I have found that is not always the case for whatever reason. Then there is self-contained reference files. A great idea...I don't have to worry about moved files but the file size is enormous. I do long videos (sometimes an hour or so) so file size is really important to me.
    Is there anyway I can do a self-contained reference file but somehow reduce the file size or something? I know I'm throwing a bone here but I figured I would ask because my current scenario is not improving daily. I know I can put my hour or whatever to tape but that essentially is compressing it and I'm using valuable time. Any advice?

    HI Lowsky, I been down this road some time back and my opinion is that if you are working in any workflows associated with CMFs (contemporary media format) in a tapeless workflow then storing your LONG TERM content as CMF's on spinning disk will eventually lead to misery and a hopeless state of anger and heartache. Spinning disk is not the long term answer.
    refer here for lots of detail: I have post this detail in another forum at
    http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=21284&page=6
    *Archiving FCP Media Manager Projects, essence, import/transfer material.. etc*
    Aside from many testimonials about DISK being faster (more accessible?) and convenient, storing content on spinning disk is a like as a child having all the toys you could imagine but only playing with your 3-4 favourites. (replace with any analogy). Simply you only need the stuff around on disk that you actually use a lot or currently.
    I (and I'm not alone) don't trust and disk storage system unless you buy enterprise level disk arrays with some fault tolerance and smart disk array controllers AND that you have at least multiple instances of the content. I qualify ENTERPRISE disk systems - these at $USD5.00-$USD10.00/GB+. I mean those disk arrays from I,T. vendors, and M&E guys like Isolon, DDN, Apple, HP, Copan and their 40+ ilk.
    The affordable stuff most of us is around $USD0.25-$USD0.75/GB - SATA and lowest end HBA's or simple controllers. Basically just spinning +power soaking heat dissipating buckets+ to put our content into. (USB | FW or the external JBOD disk enclosues with an HBA or higher FC disk arrays)
    Most of these are enterprise disk storage systems that are out of the price range of many on this forum...
    Devices like DROBO™ are cute but they are way way too slow (29MB/s when not busy consolidating itself ) and are very limited on their architecture for VIDEO work (useless). I gave mine away after a week to a photographer.
    Alternatives like many sets of external and detachable and mobile spinning disks, leaving them spun down until use offer a great odea however unless the disk controller is savvy, you may as well have a bank of el cheapo Le Cie 1TB death disks and get on your knees and face the moon when you power them up.. (Good = luck with that!) mode=:rant
    *Viable Archive Solutions for CMFs?*
    After looking for viable solutions to by content storage problem after moving to a tapeless workflow with my HVX200 and P2, AND losing on two separate occasions a whole 1TB external disk (Le Cie).. losing most of the data of two drives (2 x 1TB over 4 months).. I have had it with disks!
    For me, Disk storage should only be used like a +kitchen table+ for immediate and current and frequently accessed work. Like the +toy analogy+, hen not in use, put the toys away somewhere where they will not be damaged (the content objects) (like a large toy box or cupboard) that you can access with ease. (not the garden shed out the back nor the attic else it will never be used). This is workflow is simple enough..
    My first thought for managing FCP media manager archives, P2 footage and final composites was to use BD's.. however the cost for the content that was wanted to archive was not cost effective. I had literally 100's of old video tapes, DV , HDV and ye old video8 rubbish that I needed to move to a CMF, all accessible via proxies and metadata (a la CATDV™ a mam from squarebox.co.uk). The restriction was COST of BD or DVD-DL media and worse the time of write and then access the material ESSENCE when I needed it.
    I even looked for a while at many 100's of DVD-5's which in Hong Kong are as cheap as free beer coasters in a bar. I would buy them in canisters of 100's at a time. Simply these are cost effective using TOAST to make multivolumes self extracting archives, but are SOOOooooo slow to write and then access.
    So I turned to looking at the economies and workflows of using LTO4 Ultrium data tape drive. I was quite surprised at the reasonable cost.
    The cost of Ultrium LTO4 data tape media of to 800GB native for prices that are as cheap as $USD1.40/GB as pure media (the tape cartridge itself).It depend where you buy them and at what quantity. Of course there are the necessary offset/initial costs of the data tape drive AND the SAS HBA you will need for your mac. (LTO4 Ultrium @ $USD2700 and $USD150+ for SAS HBA). Much cheaper fo Ultrium LTO3 but lower data rates and capacities.
    NExt year HP et al will have Ultrium LTO5 out at 1.5TB RAW/native capacity as their roadmap suggests.
    THe uncompressed / RAW data rates of LTO4 Ultrium data tape drives for ARCHIVING material is for me between 105MB-109MB/sec (that's megabytes).. simply BLOWS any firewire 800 interface out of the water. There are many variables however essentially for people like us whose business is content creation or even the part timer who doesn't want to lose stuff, this is really worth a look. Again it will depend on the software you utilise. I use Tolisgroups BRU.
    Just do the sums on the time it takes you to archive (or copy to another disk system [BD or DVD-5, DVD 9, et or a spindle) lets say 4 hours of DVCPROHD 1080P (110Mbs or just over 1GB/minute). You can see that this is a lot of content and will take a great deal of time.
    This works out at roughly 240GB.
    I think this will take over 500 minutes (6 hours? @ 2min/GB)+ to COPY on a FW400 interface and slightly less on a FW800 interface.
    However it takes a mere 2200 second or 36 minutes using an LTO4 SAS Ultrium tape drive (with no tape mount/dismount timeloadlocate)!
    On a lesser scale, a look at DDS tapes for the low end. These are despite rumours/myths are quite stable and work well with the right software on the mac and the mac laptop.
    I am having great success with this archive and recall system using Tolisgroups BRU that is NATIVE for OSX.
    I have posted some very recent information on the two SAS PCIe HBAs I am using (ATTOTECH and LSI) and the two tape drives I am using (HP and QUantum).
    For LTO4 Ultrium SAS tape drives I would recommend only HP and ATTOTECH EXPRESSSAS as this is reliable and very stable and very fast for OSX.
    I am very happy with this archive/recall workflow using LTO4 Ultrium data tape for FCP.
    I have post this detail in another forum at
    http://www.reduser.net/forum/showthread.php?t=21284&page=6
    hth
    w
    HK

  • Exporting final project for youtube (with high quality)

    hey guys,
    i have been trying to export videos and upload them onto youtube giving them a high quality look for some time now.
    the website recommends for the best quality:
    -mpeg 4
    -320X240
    -MP3 audio
    -30 fps
    there is even a video on it here:
    http://www.google.com/support/youtube/bin/answer.py?answer=55745&topic=10526
    i tried two different ways of exporting my project. i use fc express hd on a macbook pro...the first export was an mpeg 4 divx export. i used the 4 recomendations but it still came out pixilated. i then tried the regular mpeg 4 option in the export menu. this one had a different audio option. there was no mp3 listen and ACL audio or something like that,
    either way they both came out pixilated! this was only a 5 minute long video. i have seen plenty of videos on youtube that were 8 minutes long and crystal clear.
    there must be SOMETHING i should change in my exporting options! please help! its been like a year and a half now that ive been searching for clear youtube videos!
    thanks for your time,
    Mike

    hmm i tried there suggestions and unfortunatly it came out pixilated!
    i was excited to see the results too because that page given seemed like it would work...
    i double checked all of the settings and they matched up with what they suggested...
    does any body have any suggestions? thankyou!

  • Need high quality compression for iDVD but don't want letterbox

    I have a FCE project which has moving stills, lots of titling and graphics (from Photoshop) and want a high quality compression to get rid of the interlacing, etc. I need to get this to iDVD.
    If I export as quicktime, it's just ok quality. If I use Sorenson or Animation (as recommended by the Apple creatives), the resulting project looks great but I have letterboxing on the top/bottom in iDVD, which I don't want. I'm using a 4:3 aspect ratio and my FCE project is 720x480.
    What am I doing wrong? I don't have the "preserve aspect using letterbox" checked but get the letter box anyway. (I tried it with this and have a thicker letterbox!)
    Thanks.

    If the material is 4:3 edited in a 4:3 there is no reason for iDVD to letterbox it, unless the iDVD preferences are set to widescreen.
    It's hard to tell where you're going wrong because there are so many variables along the way, and you haven't spelled out what you're doing, format, frame sizes, export settings, etc.
    Whoever told you to export to Sorenson or Animation is completely wrong. You should export to QuickTime Movie. iDVD only accept a couple of formats DV material and HDV in Apple Intermediate Codec, and HD is always widescreen. The HDV 720p format has no interlacing. These formats export from FCE with interlacing unless you switch it off in FCE. You can do this in Item Properties for the sequence. Set the Field Dominance to None.

  • How to export a complex Keynote to high quality video for DVD?

    I have had dozens of attempts to turn a complex Keynote into a high quality video.
    Either they turn out disappointiingly way low res
    or they are very choppy with half the transitions gone
    or they Cannot make the video at all
    HELP.
    I need to turn this project in to my client today.

    If you use the DVD export in Keynote 3 with a self playing movie, the quality will be fine...just don't trust what you see on your mac screen, play it on a DVD player to check the quality. I did a test a while back and it was only the pauses that looked bad.
    Read about it here:
    http://www.keynoteuser.com/news/?p=135
    pay close attention to what I complain about...it's just the slide pauses, not the normal motion playback, which means selfplaying stuff looks pretty decent (though never as good as the original, but that's the fault of the DVD format, not Apple).

  • Best Settings for YouTube's HIgh Quality Video

    I see YouTube has a new "high quality" video option that uses H.264 video at 480 x 360. If I want to take full advantade of this format how should I build my videoo to upload? I assume I should use H.264, but Premiere doesn't have an option to do so at 480x360.

    After numerous trials and extensive searches on forums (with solutions way too complicated for me) this is my recipe.
    (After upgrading to PE 7 I hoped that PE would do the trick, but no.)
    1. Premiere Elements.
    Export ("Share") to harddisk, DV-AVI, 4:3 or Widescreen doesn't matter.
    2. Windows Movie Maker.
    Import this AVI-file. You won't need to change or edit anything.
    Just "publish" (to disk) in
    WMV-format, dvd-quality (4:3 size) PAL 3,0 M.
    3. You Tube.
    Upload to YouTube.
    Then wait (approx 10 min. per minute movietime) until the uploaded movie is released and online in high quality.
    Happy uploading!
    Max size is 100 Mb; but there are work arounds for that too.
    Felix

  • What is "High Quality" standard for 150 minimum files?

    To be listed on iTunes U, there is a requirement of a minimun 150 "High Quality" media files. What is the description of "High Quality" ? Is this a technical standard or a content standard?

    Ryan C:
    https://code.msdn.microsoft.com/Azure-DocumentDB-NET-Code-6b3da8af
    Mimi G:
    http://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/documentation/articles/documentdb-resources/

  • I am waiting for Adobe reply on open case for change of platform for Photoshop

    I am waiting for adobe reply on open case 0210885939. My user # is 114057269.

    Try sub-forum http://forums.adobe.com/community/photoshop

  • Can you re-import your CD's in high quality, but keep the original track data?

    Dear All
    I got roughly halfway through importing my collection of about 800 CD's into iTunes 12, before realising that the default import settings applied by iTunes is not 'the best'.  In fact it's not set anywhere near 'the best', it's something like 128kbps lossy format.   I wanted to import my CD's in lossless CD-quality.  WAV would have been ideal.  However it would appear I've missed a trick by assuming it would be full-quality unless I specified something else.
    I'm not using portable devices to listen to my music, I have a Mac Mini and an endless supply of hard-drive storage space, and I'm only accessing it at home.
    A large number of my discs are classical and jazz, and in many cases I've needed to amend or reorganise the metadata, so that it all complies with an overall filing and categorising system that makes sense and is useful.   I also have a large number of rock and blues CD's, but their metadata is normally correct when the discs are issued, so they usually doesn't need adjusting.   If you're wondering, yes my taste in music is eclectic.   I'm just as big a fan of Mozart as I am of Motorhead as I am of Mo Foster.   The problem is that with classical and opera it's important that the 'artist' category shows the names of the performer/soloist/conductor/orchestra, not the name of the composer!  (I wish I *did* have actual recordings of JS Bach playing the Well Tempered Clavier!!).
    So I'm looking at this big pile of CD's thinking, "is it worth re-importing them all again at CD-quality?", because I'd really like top-quality copies, and I only really want to have to do this once.   It *is* worth doing so long as I don't have to do all the jiggery-pokery with all the artist/composer data again, because that takes an enormous amount of time.
    So the question is... will iTunes 12 let me re-import my discs at maximum quality, but at the same time let me keep the data that was painstakingly edited and stored with the previous (lesser-quality) versions?   Or is there a workaround?  Maybe I could surreptitiously replace the old audio with new audio when iTunes isn't running and hope that it won't notice?
    It goes without saying that I have spent quite a while trying to do this for myself before asking the forum, and so far I've drawn a blank so I'd be very grateful for any expert thoughts and opinions.
    Best wishes
    Nick

    HI
    Don't use WAV format as you will not retain metadate. You should use aiff if space is not a problem but Apple lossles format will be just as good with smaller file size.
    When you reimport your CDS, you will be asked if you wish to replace existing copies. Select yes, you data changes should be retained. Be aware that when you reimport, CD track names and album title must match your existing files, otherwise they will not replace existing versions.
    Jim

  • Looking For A High Quality Connection For My Touch And My Navigation Syst.

    Hey Everyone,
    I have an AVN-7000 Eclipse navigation system in my car. It has several different inputs for things like ipods and video games. I'd like to know which is the best to use and if there are products out there yet for hooking my touch up to my deck. I know there is an "AV Input" which I assume is RCA, there is also optical and coaxial inputs, too. I want both the audio and the video to be sent to the unit. Just want to know which one I should use in order to get the best quality, and if there are products out there yet. Thanks in advance for you help!
    Here is a link to the Eclipse product page:
    http://www.eclipse-web.com/avn/avn7000overviews.html

    Isn't there something that could convert the signal coming out of the ipod to optical? There are all kinds of docs that allow for HDMI output and stuff like that. Although I agree that the ipod touch doesn't have optical out, I think there might be a way to convert the digital out to optical. Is that wrong? Thanks for your help.

  • No High Quality Setting for HDV 1080i on QT Export?

    hello. a quick question.
    when exporting a footage from fce as a quicktime movie in hdv 1080i format, why is it that there is no section for quality settings? because it automatically puts "medium" next to the quality button, whereas i'd naturally would like to see it saying "high"

    If your original is HD material export to QuickTime Movie.
    There is no setting because AIC uses a fixed data rate.

Maybe you are looking for