Loss of quality in loaded clips

Problem:
http://img706.imageshack.us/img706/3715/probka.png
It's sample of video I have. It's quality isn't already gratifying, but when I load it to Premiere CS4, sample looks this way:
http://img697.imageshack.us/img697/7840/probka2.png
Second picture shows apparent distortion and pixelize, general loss of quality.
How can I fix it? Any settings which I could change to improve quality of loaded clips?
thanks for help and sorry for my poor english

Did you drop your footage in a PAL widescreen sequence with the fields set default to lower or did you set up a sequence with the fields set to upper
because that is what the mpeg files are: TFF
Sequence should match the footage.

Similar Messages

Editing iPhone video without loss of quality

I've a stack of video clips taken from my iPhone 3GS which I want to simply stitch together and edit down a little WITHOUT loss of quality.
All I want to do is import, crop and stitch them together, thus create a single file *with no change in image quality*. (for smaller projects, I used to do this kind of thing in older versions of QuickTime Pro.)
What is the best procedure for this in iMovie 09? Indeed, can it be done?
My understanding is that ANY re-compression will result in artefacts and loss in quality.
Further info...
I've managed to import the clips ok (making sure any options to 'optimise' anything are turned off) and edit them together in iMovie. This way, the import is fast and the images seems untouched, so I assumed no conversion has been done on the video (I think I'm wrong here?)
(Setting the project aspect ratio to 4:3 was the other gotcha.)
Having sorted the above out, and done some editing, I now want to export to a single file. I understand the iPhone codec is H264. However, when I export (via quicktime) and select H264, it wants to re-compress. I worry this will loose quality.
When I export with lossless compression, of course I get a 150G file - owch. The sum total size of the originals are 2.63G
Any suggestions?

iMovie will re-compress. To me this is a small price to pay for having an edited movie. Personally, I would optimize, but if you keep your movies simple, you will be OK without. If you decide to apply image stabilization or speed changes, you will definitely need to optimize. Optimization resolves the highly compressed h.264 frames into full frames in Apple Intermediate Codec.
While the quality loss you may experience is not likely to be visible to the naked eye, if that is your only criterion, then avoid iMovie and follow QuickTime Kirk's advice.
Here is a [sample video|http://vimeo.com/7093442] that I made in a Dentist Office. You can see what the re-compression looks like. In this case, I did not optimize.
Editing in iMovie is non-destructive, so you can try it both ways (imovie and QuickTime Pro) and see if you can tell the difference.
Message was edited by: AppleMan1958

Loss of quality of exported DVD movie on TV when compared to Digital original

Hi
Can anyone please suggest a way to limit the loss in quality when burning a completed movie to a DVD for TV playback?
When I playback on my Mac monitor (in either MPEG or H.264 saved versions) the image quality is 'mint' and seems as clear/rich as it was filmed.
However, once I have exported (using various 'best options' availible to me in via Prem Pro export menus) the SD (and Blu-ray) DVD playback on a TV seems a long way away from the quality level of the digital original still playing on my Mac.
I am prepared for a drop in quality in both SD and even HD formats due to the compression processes, but I'm still disapointed with how amazing my digital copy looks compared to my best DVD efforts.
Why is it that commercial 'hollywood' SD are still miles apart from my 'home made' version?
Can anyone please suggest their tried/test 'digital alchemy' formular for getting fantastic results onto a DVD/TV playback, please?
Here are my current details/settings:
Canon 5d and XF300 to capture 1080p 25 fps footage (timeline created to match footage)
CS5.5 platform = Premiere Pro/After Effects/Media Encoder/Encore (and burn saved ISO image using Roxio Toast version 10)
Length of edits = 40 to 50 minutes (approximately) creating HD but mainly SD event movies.
Create HD but mainly SD versions
Export out of Prem Pro = MPEG or MPED-DVD/Blu-ray H.264
Video Quality = 5
Field order = None/Progressive (matching my original source footage)
VBR 2 = Min 7/Target 8/Max 8.5 or CBR 8
Use Maximum Render Quality
Could the issue be with what happens after the export from PremPro into Encore?
What else could/should I be doing?
All constructive comments are very weclome and appreciated ...
Thanks,
B

Why is it that commercial 'hollywood' SD are still miles apart from my 'home made' version?
Because they use super-expensive hardware compression.
Still, I make DVDs that look almost exactly like the output from Pr using my Kona card.
I wonder if you're ending up with double-compression on your DVD. And maybe I'm confused here, but it sounds like you're using Toast and Encore, and I see no reason for that, if so.
There are a few ways to get to DVD from Pr. The simplest may be just to send your Pr project to Encore, using Dynamic Link. That will ensure you're only compressing once.
Another is to export from Pr or AME using a DVD preset, and when you take the resulting MPEG2 to Encore, be sure your clips are set to "Don't transcode." And use the comparable strategy for BR.
CBR at 8 should yield you stunning looking DVDs.

Confirming no loss of quality on export "Movie to DV Stream"?

This may be a very dumb question, but before I spend a lot of time on this, I wanted to confirm there is NO loss of quality.
From a DV file (imported form my DV camera) if I choose a portion of it in Quicktime and export using the feature "Movie to DV Stream" there is no loss of quality from the original DV file right?
I am working on an iMovie project, opening the original LONG DV files into Quicktime and pulling shortened clips from them to import into iMovie, so as not to import the whole thing.
Before I spend time doing this for my entire project, I want to make sure there is no loss of quality from my original DV footage.
Thanks for the help!
Cheryl
MacBook 2.0 GHz 2GB iMac G5 1.8GHz 2GB Mac OS X (10.4.9)

export using the feature "Movie to DV Stream" there is no loss of quality from the original DV file right?
There will be loss of quality if you export via iMovie's expert settings! The video is deinterlaced and the embedded timestamp is lost!! This is an old bug.
http://www.sjoki.uta.fi/~shmhav/iMovieHD_6_bugs.html#expertsettings
To preserve the original quality you must therefore always remember to export via the Full Quality preset instead.

Why do I get a loss of quality video when placing titels or grading in FCE. Even after rendering and saving to the final product? The video starts to get shaky

Whenever I place a title in my video in FCE, the part where I placed it losses its quality. Its getting shaky and blurred.
Even afther rendering and saving it to the final end product. The same problem occurs when I'm collor grading. I use the internal tools for titels and grading of FCE.

and some more specs;
My systsem >>
IMac 3.06 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
8 GB 1067 MHz DDR3
clips and master on Imac
Scratchdisk on external disk with firewire 0.8
On both disks I have more tehn 0,5 TB geheugen left
Videocamera HF 100
Imported clips >>
- FXP 17 Mbps
For RT I use >>
- RT Unlimited
- Playback Video Quality high
- Playback framerate high
Videoclip =
- videorate 25 fps
- framesize 1920 x 1080
- compressor apple intermediate codec
- pixel aspect square

Editing Canon 7D footage without without loss of quality

First time poster, long time reader, so please go easy – you guys all started somewhere, now its time for me J
I’ve done video editing for a while now, only as a hobby though, with consumer camcorders and basic editing software. I absolutely love doing it and now I’ve taken the step up to a 7D and been asked to do a music clip for a band (call it timing). By the way I am using Adobe CS4 and CS5.
My questions (you’ll have to excuse my vagueness – I am newb when it comes to the technical side) is what should I shoot it in? 60fps or 25fps? NTSC or PAL?. It would only be for Youtube and perhaps DVD/Blu-Ray to distribute elsewhere, but I still would like the highest quality possible, and from the past, there’s nothing worse than shooting in the wrong format – so I wanted to try get this right the first time. Hence my post
What really confuses me is the loss of quality from the camera to online. I find that sometimes I have to import the footage (from other video cameras I have had – Sony and Canon MiniDV’s, Panasonic HS300, GoPro Hero etc) into Premiere, edit the clips, export to a file, then import into AE and add effects, then export once more. Each time I try different formats and each time the quality differs but I seem to lose plenty of quality along the way. I know it’s not simple but for this music clip I would like to learn a bit more beforehand, what the correct workflow would be to minimise loss of quality, so I am better prepared.
Thanks in advance,
Alex

My questions is what should I shoot it in? 60fps or 25fps? NTSC or PAL?.
That's way too broad a question for a forum about NLE software. The simple answer is, "whatever you want." The less-simple answer is, "it depends." Whether you shoot 60fps or 30fps or 25fps or 24fps or XXfps is all about the look you want, so experiment. NTSC and PAL don't have any application to HD video (despite their regular use to label certain HD formats as such).
What really confuses me is the loss of quality from the camera to online. I find that sometimes I have to import the footage (from other video cameras I have had – Sony and Canon MiniDV’s, Panasonic HS300, GoPro Hero etc) into Premiere, edit the clips, export to a file, then import into AE and add effects, then export once more. Each time I try different formats and each time the quality differs but I seem to lose plenty of quality along the way. I know it’s not simple but for this music clip I would like to learn a bit more beforehand, what the correct workflow would be to minimise loss of quality, so I am better prepared.
With relatively few exceptions, you don't have to worry about this--you certainly don't have to worry about this with 7D footage and Premiere Pro and After Effects. Both programs support the footage natively; it's more a matter of learning how to use the suite applications in a manner that avoids exporting to intermediate files. Dynamic Link is one way, but you can also import a Premiere Pro project/sequence directly into AE. A high-resolution intermediate is another way. There is a whole section of the help documents that describe the interoperability between the applications; reviewing it closely will help get you up to speed, so that you can ask more specific questions about workflow, etc.

Export loss of quality

Hello,
I work in screen printing and I'm having trouble keeping image quality while exporting.
My art department is sending AI files to a xitron rip station. the ripped files then become a tiff.
the quality of the tiff. is high after the rip. I then load the tiff. into illustrator and then into a template.
this is done so I can position multiple files at certain distance. when I go to export, I select tiff, greyscale,
300ppi, no anti-aliasing, no lzw compression. after its exported is when the loss of quality happens. Is this
because the art is being rasterized and the very act of exporting is saving it as lower quality file? or should I be using
the un ripped/vector files to set up in the template and then save as AI file, then send that file to the rip?
I've only been using illustrator for about 2 days now and I'm lost. The art department doesn't know what the problem is.
thank you
- lost in Wisconsin

abandoned the plan because of how the work flow at my job would have changed. I downloaded Photoshop and was able to set my templates to 1000ppi.
I'm now able to use the ripped files and save them as a high quality tiff. which means I no longer have to add more steps to my process.
I might try a few more things in illustrator just because I feel like I cheated by switching programs. If the vector files work or I find
another solution I'll let you know.
thanks again.
-cheating in Wisconsin

How can I match sound quality between video clips and audio clips?

Hi guys,
First of all let me say that I enjoy using the latest Media Encoder. However, as a novice, I have two related problems.
1.I am recording video to use with PowerPoint slides in Adobe Captivate. I am encoding the video with best quality FLV. This produces very good video,
      but with a degraded audio track, even though I had filtered the audio in soundbooth. The post encoding sounds like it did before Soundbooth corrections.
2. Some of the video recording has been set cut into audio clips to be used as background narration behind PowerPoint. The logic behind this is: that if both are
      recorded at the same time, the voice quality should match.
This is far from the outcome. I have tried MP3 for the audio which of course produced the best sound- but is entirely unlike the rest of the video. I have also encoded the audio with Windows Waveform preset figuring that since the soundbooth edit was a .wav file, that there should be a reasonable match. Wrong again!
So, the audio quality of all clips is poor, and the difference between the encoded video clips, and the audio encoded clips spoils the otherwise professional result in Captivate.
Please help, all of you experts.

Thank you.
OS Windows 7 x 64; 3.2 MHz; 2 TB; 12 GB Ram-9GB ram allocated to Adobe.
My process is this:
1. The whole video and audio narration material is shot in one continuous video sesseion.
2. The microphone is only mono, but the camera is set to stereo. Noone can work out how to change the camera to mono.
3. In Premiere Pro 5, I select render and replace in SoundBooth.
4. In Soundbooth, I choose Add Multichannels.
5. In Multichannels, I delete the unwanted noisy channel, and any other unused channels.
6. With the remaining mono channel, I then select Export and Save As option, then Stereo.
7. Next I edit the stereo channels as needed.
8. The imported stereo won't automatically update in Premiere Pro, so in PPR I import the new edited stereo track.
9. I test this track in PPR, to check that it is playing R & L channels. It is. OK.
10 On the timeline, I proceed to cut apart this single stereo wavelength .
11.These clips are saved as Video, or Audio subclips.
12 From the video subclips, I export to Media Encoder, and choose either FLV4 match attributes (High Q). This I modify to custom 2 pass (Custom save).
     The summary says that this is saved to MP3 Stereo.
13. I import this into Captivate 5, but the Video outcome is Left channel only. I have tested this on Media Player/Real Player where it is also L channel only.
14. I export my Audio subclips to Media player, and select MP3 option and this summary also reports stereo. The Audio outcome is stereo, when played in any player and in Captivate 5.
I cannot understand how a single, continuous track edited uniformly in Soundbooth to stereo, can produce different outcomes in Media player.
I would so appreciate a solution to this problem, because, in the Captivate 5 e-learning production, the switch between stereo audio (behind PowerPoints), and l. channel video is distracting. Naturally, the l. channel only is a thin sound. It is as if it had never been edited in SoundBooth at all.

Imported & Exported HD Video Imovie '11 Big Loss of Quality

This is plain outrageous i noticed this flaw about a week ago.
I noticed how iMovie '11 degrades the quality of any HD Content whether it be a an Imported file or card or camera regardless. And Yes in the Prefrences FULL QUALITY is selected under the video tab. The Exported Content is the same Poor quality under highest settings quality FULL 1080P as imported even if exported a Quicktime X file H264 compression. The bottom line the imported content looks horrible in iMovie '11 it exports horrible too under the highest settings.
I tried Final Cut X on the other hand and It was Great no loss of quality there via the comand import Imovie Project. But I did notice how Final Cut X messed up on some of the transitions and the titles were off but that was an easy fix
Something has to be done iMovie '11 When Are you going ship '12 or '13

Welcome to iMovie Discussions.
(..Sob!..) If you can bear the anguish and argument and technicalities and angst, Search for "Steve Mullen" and follow any of those threads: you'll find all manner of description about what's happening, what's going wrong, how to correct it, whether it can be corrected ..and so on, and so forth..
(See this thread: http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=11846858&#11846858 ..)
I've never noticed this problem: but when I HAVE seen poor quality - by adding an iMovie '09 title onto pristine DV footage, like this:
..I've followed Karl Petersen's instructions about how to change it into (apparent) top-notch quality like this:
Karl suggested opening the exported movie in QuickTime, and pressing ⌘ and 'J' and ticking the 'High Quality' box in the lower-right corner of Video Settings:
See here, and click on 'Start Slideshow'.
Steve disagrees, I think, with this, and says that this simple fix doesn't work.
Try it, and see if it works for you.

Import(?) then export pdf's - loss of quality?

Hi-
A complete newbie to printing. I prepared layouts in my database (filemaker pro), exported as pdf. They look great when opened in Acrobat Pro, and print nicely. Now I find out most companies want pdf from In Design or a similar program. If I open pdf's in In design, can I then export them like the printing company wants without any loss of quality? This would all be grayscale, but has a numver of images (it's a book from a specialty dog show).. The layouts are just what I want, with tables that were finicky to get right, and data straight from my database. I would HATE to start over! Any help / ideas would be deeply appreciated!
BTW - there is no way to mimic pdf''s from In Design in Acrobat Pro?
Many thanks in advance.

Interesting question, there's two elements to it, firstly what you assume 'most companies' want and secondly what can Indesign do to help you.
Firstly, all companies are different and have different workflows and requirements. The simplest thing to do is to send 'the company' your PDFs as you have them now and ask them to make sure they are suitable. If not, or if this won't work for you move on to the second question...
Secondly, yes, Indesign can do that, and I for one frequently use Indesign for just that purpose, refrying PDFs from multiple sources to a more consistent standard. It depends on what you are using the PDFs for as to what export settings you use but Indesign is very good at this, with the exception of the greyscale part you mentioned. Others could offer more detailed advice but you have to use Acrobat Pro to make sure this is working properly and apply fixes as necessary. Personally if greyscale id needed I use the 'TouchUp Object' tool and a plugin called Pitstop but there are other methods too, let us know your specific problems, if any.
One very useful tool when putting PDFs through Indesign like this is Scott Zanelli's MultiPageImporter, highly recommended for placing more than one page, and sometimes even when placing only one page too!

Quicktime loss of quality in web browsers?

Hello. I'm trying to upload a 30M MOV file to my website. I noticed that there's a loss of quality when the movie plays in a web browser as opposed to just playing it in the Quicktime player outside of the website. Is there something I need to add to the code?
Note - this applies to just trying to play an MOV in any web browser (meaning, with no HTML - just going 'file', 'open' in any web browser).
Can I add something to the HTML code that will make the quality match how it looks in Quickime?

ASP-CT wrote:
It is so obvious that there is a noticable loss of quality in all files exported from LR
Most of the people in this forum who try to help others with Lightroom are pleased with the quality of exported results we're getting. If you are unsatisfied, it would behoove to explain.
I mean, for me, there is no loss of quality (in fact, image is 100% same) when exporting in original format. And when exporting in reduced sizes in formats like jpeg there is some softening unless output sharpening is applied.
Otherwise, color is same, tone is same, brightness is same - it's all good for me...
Exception: some viewers are not color managed, or are color managed but do it "wrong" (I have no idea why color management tends to be so problematic) - in which case color (and to some extent tone) will be off...
What about you?
PS
ASP-CT wrote:
it is assumed that the photographer is doing something wrong
Operator error is a frequent culprit, but it's not the only culprit - sometimes computer setup is to blame. But if that's the case, you know who is going to have to make it right, right? Anyway, if all is well using another software, that may be a path of less resistance.
Don't get me wrong - Lr may have bugs which are influencing correct functioning in your case - but insisting that it's all Lr and none you (or your computer..) is a place from which there is nowhere to go, except to that other software we were talking about, but beware - it may have problems too .
My advice: take a deep breath, maybe a walk, even sleep on it if need be, then start again from a cooler place.
Rob

Converting from Apple Lossless to MP3: loss of quality?

Hi,
I have made the "mistake" of importing dozens and dozens of CD's using the Apple Lossless encoder. Nothing bad about the encoder, on the contrary. But my iPod is now full.
Is there a way I can convert all these tracks to MP3? Will there be a loss of quality from the re-conversion beside the one inherent to MP3? (since we are not starting from the original CD) And will I have to re-create my playlists?
Mmmhhh... doesn't sound too good, right?
Xavier.

Go to Preferences in iTunes. Then go to advanced and importing. In importing change the import using to MP3 encoder.
Quit out of this menu. On the top tool bar you have Advanced and under here you have convert option. If you select the songs that you want to convert and use this convert option they will go to MP3s

Photoshop CS2 - Blowing scans up with as little loss of quality as possible

What's the best way to make a file that you can blow up into a big poster, say 10 by 20 feet, for example, without the image being too blurry?
I plan to scan in some drawings I did on 8.5x11", colour them in Photoshop CS2, and then make a file so that you can print it out as a big poster, like the 10 by 20 feet example above. I would like the printout to be sharp (as little loss of quality as possible).
What's the best way to do this?
Which dpi should I scan the pictures in, so I can blow them up big?
Which file type should I save the working file, and the file I'm going to print them out?
Please advise. Thank you.

What are your specifics (how high is the resolution of the scans, how many pixels do you have in the image you want to print)?
There are some tools out there for doing just that kind of thing, but you have to realize that there are limits - no software yet can invent detail where none exists.
Starting with very CLEAN image information, a product called Perfect Resize (which used to be called Genuine Fractals) is pretty good at this, as it finds "edges" in the image and tries to preserve them. I have a beautiful 24 x 30 inch print I made from an old Canon D30 capture (just 3 megapixels) upsampled with Perfect Resize and it stands up even to close inspection.
But the good news is that people don't usually scrutinize giant prints from too closely. A rule of thumb is that viewing distance will typically be no closer than about the long dimension of the image (e.g., 20 feet in your case).
OnOne Software has a trial version of Perfect Resize available (chances are you'll only need the standard edition). Alternatively, if you'd like to post a small part of an image you're considering blowing up, I'll be happy to run it through Perfect Resize and post the result so you can see. Here's a small example using one of my own images:
Original:
Upsampled 400% in each dimension (this forum software may mess up the display but you should be able to copy and paste it into Photoshop or a viewer app):
-Noel

Exporting to WMV with a massive loss of quality

Hi there!
I've never had an issue with this before, but I need a little expert help on this one.
I'm trying to export a time line, source of 1280x720, into a WMV file. I've done it before with no issues.
But now, it seems like when the exporting is done, and I open the file, there is a loss of quality in the beginning. It's odd because, it seems like the video starts off just fine, but then a few seconds in, it degrades. The degragation continues for about 5 seconds, making the image a little blurry, but then it kicks back into the high quality it was. It maintains the high quality for the rest of the sequence.
What is even odder is that, when I export the individual, 5 second scene that looks degraded in the main file all by itself, it looks just fine.
I can't help but thing that it's something about it in my sequence that is making it do that. There is no effects or transistions between scenes involved at all.
Im exporting:
FORMATL Windows Media
PRESET: HDTV 720 60 High Quality (thought I have used 30 as well, with the same issue)
Video settings are
CODEC: Windows Media Video 9
Encoding Passes: Two
Bitrate mode: Variable Constrained
Framerate: 59.94
Pixel Aspect: Square Pixels
Decoder complexitiy: Auto
Keyframe interval: 5 seconds
Average video bitrate 5000
Peak Video bitrate 8000
peak video buffer size 5
Thanks in advance for any help!

Correct, it has its own ways to mess up your video.
So, you're not helping with the question at all, you're just rallying against YouTube?
Thanks for your help.
We had issues like that with 2 Pass VBR. We even dialled in huge data rates which did not fix the issue,m Switching to a CBR profile fixed it "good enough" but not perfect. In our case wmv was demanded by the client (PowerPoint). I concluded the wmv encoder was defective in AME and best avoided.
Can you use H.264 instead for your purpose?
Thanks for the suggestion! I just tried H.264 and had the same exact issue, though.
Since the individual pieces weren't having the problem, I decided to try some tests. Every piece along was fine, except for the "Begin Transmission" part, which still screwed up.
So, I tried various renderings with and without it, the words, the static...and eventually came to find out that it was the "Static" video that was doing it. I suppose it may have been because that video was originally 640x480, and I just zoomed into it to make it fit the screen. For whatever reason, that was the problem, and when I re-encoded it with the static gone, it worked just fine.
Thanks for your help, though!

Adobe Flash - Loss of quality in images

Hello,
I am building a movie in Adobe Flash but when previewing in Flash it shows image quality as perfect but when previewing in HTML it is losing its image quality. Do you know why?
Thanks,
Adrian

ASP-CT wrote:
It is so obvious that there is a noticable loss of quality in all files exported from LR
Most of the people in this forum who try to help others with Lightroom are pleased with the quality of exported results we're getting. If you are unsatisfied, it would behoove to explain.
I mean, for me, there is no loss of quality (in fact, image is 100% same) when exporting in original format. And when exporting in reduced sizes in formats like jpeg there is some softening unless output sharpening is applied.
Otherwise, color is same, tone is same, brightness is same - it's all good for me...
Exception: some viewers are not color managed, or are color managed but do it "wrong" (I have no idea why color management tends to be so problematic) - in which case color (and to some extent tone) will be off...
What about you?
PS
ASP-CT wrote:
it is assumed that the photographer is doing something wrong
Operator error is a frequent culprit, but it's not the only culprit - sometimes computer setup is to blame. But if that's the case, you know who is going to have to make it right, right? Anyway, if all is well using another software, that may be a path of less resistance.
Don't get me wrong - Lr may have bugs which are influencing correct functioning in your case - but insisting that it's all Lr and none you (or your computer..) is a place from which there is nowhere to go, except to that other software we were talking about, but beware - it may have problems too .
My advice: take a deep breath, maybe a walk, even sleep on it if need be, then start again from a cooler place.
Rob

Loss of quality in loaded clips

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for