Lower Admin Distance of BGP so EIGRP is higher

Customers current WAN is using P2P T1s (ML-PPP) Telco sold them a MPLS T1 network as a Backup Network. P2P T1 network is using EIGRP and MPLS is using BGP. My problem is I want to change the admistrative of the Routes learned from BGP (mpls provider) from a weight of 20 to value greater tham 90. This way the primary path is the ML-PPP NxT1 EIGRP links and the back up is MPLS. If MPLS was using Static routes, I would use IP SLA with a Track object on my static routes to the MPLS network.
I have tried the Distance BGP command 200 200 200 and it does not appear to work. But since the documentation says " configure a rating of the trustworthiness of a routing information source" on the Distance BGP command, that is not what I want. Can this be done? or should I go the Static Route way on my MPLS backup WAN network?
Thanks
Charlie

HI Charlie,
To increase BGP AD you can use distance commmand to either increase the AD of all BG routes of specific routes from specific source.
here an example.
Router bgp AS#
distance AD IP Souce Wildcard
In this example i have 2 routers connected via serial interfaces R4 and R5 and both running OSPF and BGP R4 advertise 4.4.4.4/32 via both OSPF and BGP, BGP route selected and installed in the FIB table but once the BGP AD changed OSPF route become the best.
router bgp 200
distance 120 10.10.45.4 0.0.0.0
R5#show ip bg
BGP table version is 4, local router ID is 100.10.10.5
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
r RIB-failure, S Stale
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
r> 4.4.4.4/32 10.10.45.4 0 0 100 i
R5#show ip route ospf | inc 4.4
O 4.4.4.4 [110/2] via 192.168.45.4, 00:06:19, GigabitEthernet0/1
Also i got the same result with the below command.
router bgp 200
distance bgp 200 200 200
Note that hard clear is a must, so don't forget to use clear ip bg x.x.x.x
Please rate helpful posts.
Best Regards,
Mounir Mohamed

Similar Messages

Eigrp - How to modify Admin distance for redistributing connected links and over WAN

We have a single EIGRP domain 101 across 2 locations (A and B) separated by a WAN link. Each location has a number of L3 switches at the IDF behind the router which has the L3 vlans VL1, VL2 etc. We run eigrp 101 across all the switches and on the routers but we dont advertise any of the L3 vlans on them and we do redistribute static and connected for the static and the vlans to be distributed on eigrp.
Qn
1. How do i reduce the admin distance of the directly connected vlan on IDF on our core switch. ie. Vl1 and Vl2 that are distributed via connected has a admin distance of 170 locally as the other switches sees that as External without having to advertise the networks individually on each switch.
2. Is that possible to increase the admin distance over the WAN link without having to create a 2nd eigrp domain. ie.. Add a admin distance of say 50 over the WAN link and that way devices on both sides do see that there is a 130 distance for the remote side and 90 for local for admin distance.
Why?
I am trying to separate two locations and i don't think we will be able to create an additional domain and i am trying to see alternate methods of achieving this.
Additional info-
The design i mentioned has 2 locations with a WAN connection and i have mixed (90/170) distance based on where the routes are coming(eigrp/connected/static) from eventhough everything is within the same network. We only have 1 Eigrp network 101 and was looking to alter the AD for just connected if at all possible.
Assuming i put in all the routes into the network how can i make site 2 see the site 1 network with a larger admin distance and 1 to 2 with a larger admin distance while not altering the admin distance within the local site.
Underlying reason: We are getting a MPLS link(lower bandwidth) connecting to site 3,4 and 5 at both sites and wanted to clear the internal routing first before i can add them or redistribute them into bgp.

If these two sites are connected via a P2P link and you are exchanging EIGRP routes across it then you need to be aware of what you redistribute into BGP because each site will know about it's own subnets but also the other sites subnets.
If you just redistribute all EIGRP at both sites then it's a lottery as to which MPLS connection the non EIGRP sites use.
So you either need to -
1) when you redistribute EIGRP at each site into BGP use a route map and only allow the local networks for that site
or
2) if you want each of the EIGRP sites to back each other's MPLS connection up you could have them both advertise out all networks ie. their own and the other EIGRP site's networks but modify the BGP attributes of the non local networks so they are least preferred.
You still want to use a route map to ensure only the local and other EIGRP sites network are redistributed because remember you are also receiving BGP routes from the non EIGRP sites and redistributing these into EIGRP at each site and these are exchanged via the P2P link as well.
It realty depends on what you are trying to do.
The actual basic redistribution is very straightforward, see this link -
http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/ip/border-gateway-protocol-bgp/113506-failover-eigrp-bgp-00.html
but you need to decide what you are going to do in terms of EIGRP to BGP advertisements as covered above.
I'm not trying to make things complicated for you but because you have a P2P link connecting these sites and you are running EIGRP over it then any routes received via BGP will be redistributed into EIGRP and you need to make sure they are then not redistributed back into BGP on the other site router.
Jon

Why do i get a window in the lower right corner of the screen that says "high memory usage"

why do I get a window in the lower right corner of the screen that says "high memory usage" on my compaq presario using windows xp home edition?

Hi,
No just turn the monitor off, not the product off. Which version of NIS are you using ? Please see the following screen:
Regards.
BH
**Click the KUDOS thumb up on the left to say 'Thanks'**
Make it easier for other people to find solutions by marking a Reply 'Accept as Solution' if it solves your problem.

VPLS - Which protocol, BGP, OSPF, EIGRP

Hi Community,
I am trying to figure out which protocol to use on a flat layer 2 VPLS.
We have a flat layer 2 to connect 10 offices and some other point to point links to connect to other offices. We currently use EIGRP but going forward we want to control the routnig and the path the traffic takes. I was planning on using BGP to peer between the offices using a hub and spoke topology, instead of a full mesh. I know OSFP is better for a layer 2 VPLS as it alows the full lan to be used effectively.
Can anyone suggest why we shouldn't use BGP on a VPLS from a provider?
Regards
D.

Hi Dinesh
In my personal opinion using BGP in a LAN environment will not provide any benefit as it will add to the BGP Session overhead per LAN Node owing to the Full Mesh requirement which is definitely not scalable.OSPF as an IGP is good choice to be run on the LAN in broadcast Mode which will help keep optmial design using DR/BDR.As far as the Routing Control is concerned BGP should be used for external traffic outside OSPF domain and mutually controlled redistribution between the external Routing Protocol and OSPF should be used.
But if we intend to use Hub and Spoke Topology using P2MP Broadcast Ethernet ie VPLS I think this will not be possible to achieve in OSPF Broadcast Mode neither in BGP using IBGP in Hub and Spoke Fashion among the sites because of BGP Split-Horizon Rule nor using dedicated EBGP Sessions between Hub and Spokes because of 3rd Party Next-Hop feature . So in this scenario of using VPLS for any to any communication in L2 Mode between the sites and then considering Hub and Spoke topology will not be possible to achieve either in OSPF or using BGP and also it defies the basic VPLS connectivity taken to connect the diffent sites in P2MP mode.
This is my personal take on this scenario and hope this helps you something in your design considerations.
Regards
Varma

Why does low resolution warning show when I used a high resolution camera

Hi,
I am just learning about iphoto, and have been uploading photos I took with a 4 mega-pixel camera. I have printed out photos at Kodak printers directly from the camera, and they came out great. However, when I upload the photos to the Mac, then burn them to a CD, and try to print them they come out blurry and have the low resolution warning. Does anyone know why that is happening? Is there a setting that decides the photo quality when pictures are uploaded?
Are the photos I have now "doomed" to be at low resolution?
Thanks

The "share" function actually places a mini-library on the CD so that it can be loaded into another Mac that has iPhoto. Just like in your library, the CD will contain, for each photo, the original "out of the camera" version AND the most recently modified version AND a thumbnail for viewing within iPhoto. Apparently the thumbnail was the one that was inadvertently selected for printing and, of course, the resolution is minimal.
If you want to burn a CD for use on a PC or to give to your favorite photo-finisher, create a folder on the desktop and "File/Export" the contents of the album to that folder. Then, EXIT iPhoto and burn the CD with the contents of the desktop folder. After checking the CD and confirming that all is OK, you can trash that folder.

Why does "Print Booklet" from Indesign CS5.5 only create low res pdf? How do I get High Res for Offs

Long time ID user in Agency. Created a simple 4 page brochure in CS5.5 ID. Facing pages for cust size 11x17 half fold document.
Generating the pdf for Press and HQ Print renders a nice high res document, but the print booklet feature only produces a skinny low res version. Tried to mess with the printer settings, but the result is the same with a skinny low res document.
I didn't want to recreate the brochure as a two page manually imposed as I like the option of being able to add more pages in increments of four of course. Plus it's just silly to do that when ID is supposed to handle it for me.
I worked around it this time by printing to .ps output then distilling, and then splitting the document so printer could have a "front" and "back" 11x17. But this seems kludged big time. This has to be a bug unless I am missing something.

You probably never changed the default settings in the PDF printer properties. In the print booklet dialog, click the Print Settings button, then the Setup button at the bottom of the Print Dialog that pops up, choose the PDF printer and click on Preferences. Reset the default reset the default settings to the ones you really want to use, or reset them in Windows... Control Panel > Devices and Printers... Double-click the PDF printer, then from the print queue dialog, Printer > Properties... General tab and clcik the Preferences button.

Low resolution AirPlay when using MacBook Pro but high when using iPad

I have a very strange issue. When I use Airplay from my iPad the image on the television is very clear and sharp, looking like a great HD picture. Wen I stream from my MacBook Pro, or mirror the screen, to the Apple TV the image degrades to a choppy, low-resolution, muddy version that looks terrible! It's strange because I have not had this issue before.
Anyone have any ideas on what is going on with this? Again, the image from the iPad is fine, the image from the MacBook Pro is low-resolution. Thanks in advance for any help you can offer.
- MayaAnim8or

Ike582 wrote:
Maya,
I just had a new TV, DVD, Apple TV et al installed today, and the installer told me that he generally sees better performance using Airplay from an iPad vs a Mac. As I began to play around with my device today, this was certainly true for me as well. No idea why.
Ike
But the OP said that it was not like that before.

Very low volume on hp pavilion dm4-1160us, idt high definition audio codec v 6.10.6289.0

Hi There,
Initially when I bought my dm4-1160us, the volume was better but I don't know what happened in between, now the volume is very low. I have re-installing the driver by un-installing and also using the recovery manager but still it didn't help, can someone be of some help in here, thanks in advace

Praveen,
If the Troubleshooting tips Danjen provided do not do the trick,
you might try this as a stop-gap / workaround to regain some control over the volume. It may work.
Right-Click on the Sound icon in the Task Bar (or open with Control Panel > icon view > Sound)
Open Playback Devices
Click on Speakers and Headphones (to highlight)
Click on Properties
Click on Enhancements >
Select "Loudness Equalization"
Click OK
Next,
Still in Sound > Playback Devices
Click on Communications tab
Under "When Windows detects communications activity:"
Select "Do Nothing"
Click OK
You may have to Restart / Reboot the machine for the changes to take effect.
Kind Regards,
Dragon-Fur

Variable with low value as first day of year and high as key date

hi all,
            i need to create a variable with key date for which the low value should be 1st day of the year,
means if i enter a key date (5/9/06) the values to appear should be from 1/1/06 to 5/9/06.
If i want the manipulation based on key date like key date + 90 etc. is it possible?
i have written a customer exit as
case i_vnam.
when 'keydate'
clear : e_t_range,
       l_t_range.
DATA DAT(8)TYPE D.
LOOP AT i_t_var_range INTO loc_t_var_range.
        IF loc_t_var_range-vnam = 'keydate'.
          loc_found = 'X'.
          EXIT.
        ENDIF.
      ENDLOOP.
DAT = loc_t_var_range-vnam .
if loc_found = 'X'.
   l_s_range-sign = 'I'.
        l_s_range-opt = 'BT'.
        CONCATENATE sy-datum(4) '01' '01' INTO l_s_range-low.
        l_s_range-high = DAT.
        APPEND l_s_range TO e_t_range.
      ENDIF.
WILL THIS CODE WORK.
I FEEL THERE IS PROBLEM WITH L_T_RANGE- HIGH.
IS THERE A DICREPENCY IN THE CODE?
IS THE CALLING SEQUENCE OF THE VARIABLE CORRECT?
PLZ LET ME KNOW.
THANK U ALL

Hi,
my mail bounced back. send vaild mail id.
try this.
1) create one customer exit variable say zcuvar
2) create a USER entry variable Keydate 0date.
3) in CMOD, in I_STEP = 1 of zcuvar, make it default value ad 01/01/2006 as you have done.
4) in use as range in Selection restrict.
zcuvar;0date.
hope i m clear.
regards,
San!

Low quality DVD outcome.. need help for high quality result ASAP!

Hi every 1,
(This is my first post, as I only got my iMac 2 weeks ago.. so please be gentle with me :P )
I have just been asked to turn a Microsoft powerpoint (PPT) into a DVD for "induction training video" purposes with voice overs and backing music. I have a professional music studio so providing high quality audio is fine, but trying to turn the power point into a high quality DVD file is my problem. This powerpoint has timing transitions (fade ins etc) for the timing of voice gaps. When using Microsoft PPT, you can turn the PPT into a Quicktime file which I was going to drop into iMoive then add the music and voiceovers.. this is when my problems started. Microsofts powerpoint doesn't add the transtiions and effect into render Quicktime movie, so I thought as my new iMac has iWork (KEYNOTE) I'd give it a try and to my surprise it all worked and the final mpeg4 quicktime movie result work great _when you look at it on the MAC_.
1) Problem
I then exported the file into iMovie and then my first Problem arose.... (grr). I movie lost it's sharpness and the images started to have pixelation.. that seemed to pulse in 1 seconds gaps.
I hope this was just an issue with the iMovie preview window and thought once I put it into iDVD and burnt it... the final result may be fine.. but I was wrong and the quality was crap... with the pixelation still there.
2) Problem
The other problem that came up was the about 25% of the edge of the total screen was cutoff. When i did the original file, I choose 4:3 ratio, and watched it on this..so where did the image size go wrong.. I also choose the "high quality" Quicktime file, but didn't go into the settings in the iMovie in the export section (which I should off), but after check the compression type was H.264.. and I also didn't change any settings in the 'export file' section in KEYNOTE.. this is where I think I must have gone wrong..
So in closing. my questions is:
-What's the best way to turn a PPT into a _high quality file_ so it looks professional once it goes through iMovie and iDVD.. or
- Should I just redo the whole production using iMovie ( by re doing all the work eg wording, transistion inside iMovie seems like a lot of extra word ) and so not use the PPT at all... and if I do this, then
- What's sizes, and ratio and compressions should I use for 4:3 ratio TV purpose (eg. whats size should a background image be that I do inside Photoshop, so I can put the transition wording over the top, so I see it on the TV screen and the edge doesn't get cutoff etc.?
I was very impressed with Keynote and would be happy to use this for most of the production.. but am I banging my head againist a wall...re fixing quality problems when exporting files into... can someone shed some light on this for me?
Sorry this is such a big post.. but I thought if I gave you most of the background you would have to ask so many questions.
Look forward to any help any 1 can provide..
Michael
Message was edited by: sycosingo

Matti,
Thx so much for your help.. it's really appreciated. This is by far the best result quality wise, (but I really am a perfectionist and personally are still not overall happy with the final product) but if my client is happy.. then I will continue down this track for this job.
ie Create TIFF;'s>Quicktime PRO>iMovie (transistions)>iDvd
You've been a great help and I hope it good enough for the client.
I find the images and wording lose their sharpness only after being imported into iMoive. I could still be probably enhance the quality level of the TIFF's once more, as I did the test slides in Keynote, then exported the 5 slides a individual as TIFFS out of Keynote, then imported the into QuickTime Pro as you suggested then followed your instructions all the way to the final burning of the CD. I also tried doing this in Photoshop using your suggestion of 720x576 images (for PAL) .. pixel aspect ratio to ~1.094 so you can see the correct proportions for 4:3 video output. When creating the new slide in Photoshop there were a few extra settings other than the ones you gave me... _so I would real appreciate what every setting should be when creating the NEW TIFF file in Photoshop for PAL 4:3._ I noticed when I did this the image crispness on the fonts was shithouse pixelated and shadows, even while looking at it from inside Photoshop )
As I tried mutliple ways of importing into iMovie (yours being the best suggestion) I really believe when dragging a TIFF or movie turns to blur on the way into iMoive. You can see the image is blurred from that point on.... _do I need to buy final cut pro or express to get a better image quality result?_
I also tried iMoive7, which I found was great to use video editing wise, but Apples has definitely stuffed up there by not give users a 'time line' to work with in the Audio section... but everything else in the video area was great to use.., but in my situation trying to line up the narration to slide, while having also background music is now impossible sadly.
Also I really like the 3D transitions in KEYNOTE, plus iMovie 7.. do you know if there are available for HD6 or if there's a 3rd party company that has smilar versions
Thx again,
sycosingo
Message was edited by: sycosingo

Passive interface command on RIP

Hi all,
This command below
passive-interface command give additional information to RIP, that it can't send updates via this particular interface ---
As per my understanding is this if we have 2 routers that are directly connected with each other and we enable this command on the interface of one of
routers then that router will not send any RIP updates to other router right?
secondly if these 2 routers are point to point connection we can ping directly conencted interfaces IP of routers because they are directly connected even though there is no routing protocol running between these two right?
3rd thing when i run sh ip protocols on one of router it shows
Routing Protocol is "rip"
Sending updates every 30 seconds, next due in 1 seconds
Invalid after 180 seconds, hold down 180, flushed after 240
Outgoing update filter list for all interfaces is not set
Incoming update filter list for all interfaces is not set
Redistributing: rip
Default version control: send version 2, receive version 2
    Interface             Send Recv Triggered RIP Key-chain
    FastEthernet0/0       2     2
Automatic network summarization is in effect
Maximum path: 4
Routing for Networks:
    192.168.4.0
Routing Information Sources:
    Gateway         Distance      Last Update
    192.168.4.2          120      00:23:38 ****************************************************
here last update time keeps on incrementing but sh ip route does not show now that rip is running.
so this line means
Invalid after 180 seconds, hold down 180, flushed after 240
that after 240 secs router will flush the rip routes fron the routing table right?
but sh ip protocol will always show rip as routing protocol as we have config the rip and last update time will keep on incrementing right?
thanks
mahesh

Hi Mahesh,
From the config guide:
To control the set of interfaces with which you want to exchange routing updates, you can disable the sending of routing updates on specified interfaces by configuring the
passive-interface
here is the link:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0/np1/configuration/guide/1crip.html
Correct, you do not need a routing protocol. The interfaces are directly connected. Now, if for example you add a loopback address to each router, you need a routing protocol or static router to reach the opposite router's loopback address.
The reason the interfaces/IPs do not show up in the RIP routing table is because they are directly connected and directly connected routes have a lower admin distance (1) which is preferred over rip which is 120.
yes
HTH

Interface & command consistency !?!

I am dismayed that the commands, interface, menu item location etc are so drastically different for each application. It is as if there are four different companies within Adobe, thus the simple commands like <ctrl> F does not have the same function in Illustrator as it does in InDesign. <ctrl> R in Acrobat is different in Illustrator etc etc .... Geewiz -- its frustrating! One of Adobes big pronouncements for the CS suite was the common interface from application to application within the CS suites ,,,,, uh someone screwed up in the kitchen because these Applications interfaces are obviously politically motivated and managed, with each enclave within Adobe being arrogantly possessive their own interface hierarchy and short cut functionality. Adobe upper management must take hold of these little enclaves of selfish power struggles and mandate a common interface/function/menu interface to live up to the marketing claim that the user will enjoy a consistent work environment. Really folks get it together, stop the power struggle and get over yourselves, and give the consumers/user/buyer what you promised. I dont expect anything to change within Adobe CS anytime soon, because the business culture therein is obviously stagnated and combative which will take years to resolve, unless there is courageous leadership at the top that abolishes the fortress mentality that permeates the product development cycle. Another thing I don't get is why,, when I open a file, why can't the save command default to the directory that I opened the file in. I end up saving in the wrong directory so many times because Adobe programs seem fixated on the last directory I saved to, which obviously a history lesson, and not the current folder/reality that is now my new focus and workflow. Thanks to all that have taken the time to let me vent. May your day unfold with new adventures.

Hi Mahesh,
From the config guide:
To control the set of interfaces with which you want to exchange routing updates, you can disable the sending of routing updates on specified interfaces by configuring the
passive-interface
here is the link:
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0/np1/configuration/guide/1crip.html
Correct, you do not need a routing protocol. The interfaces are directly connected. Now, if for example you add a loopback address to each router, you need a routing protocol or static router to reach the opposite router's loopback address.
The reason the interfaces/IPs do not show up in the RIP routing table is because they are directly connected and directly connected routes have a lower admin distance (1) which is preferred over rip which is 120.
yes
HTH

EIGRP vs BGP route path selection scenario

I am looking for a routing solution to the following scenario. It is a fairly simple design.
I have two WAN connections between sites A and B. One is a 20 Meg Metro Ethernet Circuit running EIGRP. The other is a 10 Meg MPLS running BGP. What do I need to do in my configuration to make sure that the 20 Meg connection is the chosen path based off the fact that it has better speed and bandwidth? It appears to me that the MPLS is the preferred path even though it is slower.
See attached Diagram:
Site A Config
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/12
description PADC COX P2P 20 Meg
no switchport
bandwidth 20480
ip address 172.20.1.1 255.255.255.252
interface GigabitEthernet2/0/2
description LEVEL 3 MPLS
no switchport
bandwidth 10240
ip address 172.22.0.2 255.255.255.252
router eigrp 1
network 10.0.1.0 0.0.0.255
network 172.20.1.0 0.0.0.3
network 192.168.76.8 0.0.0.3
redistribute bgp 65003 metric 100 1 255 1 1500 route-map MPLS_NETWORKS
redistribute static route-map DEFAULT_ROUTE
router bgp 65003
bgp log-neighbor-changes
redistribute static
redistribute eigrp 1
neighbor 172.22.0.1 remote-as 1
default-information originate
Site B Config
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
description COX Communications 10 Meg to Venyu
bandwidth 20480
ip address 172.20.1.2 255.255.255.252
duplex auto
speed auto
service-policy output VOIP
interface GigabitEthernet0/2
description Level 3 MPLS
bandwidth 10240
ip address 172.22.1.2 255.255.255.252
duplex full
speed 100
router eigrp 1
network 10.3.1.0 0.0.0.31
network 10.52.1.0 0.0.0.255
network 10.76.6.0 0.0.0.255
network 172.20.1.0 0.0.0.3
network 192.168.63.64 0.0.0.63
network 192.168.76.249 0.0.0.0
passive-interface default
no passive-interface GigabitEthernet0/0
no passive-interface GigabitEthernet0/1
router bgp 65003
bgp log-neighbor-changes
network 10.3.1.0 mask 255.255.255.224
network 10.52.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0
network 10.76.6.0 mask 255.255.255.0
network 192.168.76.249 mask 255.255.255.255
neighbor 172.22.1.1 remote-as 1

If each router is receiving advertisements for the same networks/subnet masks from both BGP and EIGRP it will always choose the BGP routes because they have a lower AD ie. 20 vs EIGRP 90.
Doesn't matter what the bandwidth is.
If you want to prefer the 20Mbps links then there are a number of options -
1) if you can summarise each sites subnets then advertise the summary via BGP and the more specific via EIGRP. More specific will be chosen even before AD is taken into account.
2) change the AD of either BGP or EIGRP so EIGRP ends up with the lower AD
3) run BGP on both links although you would still need to manipulate the attributes to make sure the link you want is used.
Jon

Bgp-Eigrp-Bgp redistribution question

Hi Experts,
Just wish to ask if there is an option to retain the as-path information in eigrp when i redistribute from bgp to eigrp then to bgp?
I recall coming across something similar to this before but I can't seem to remember it.
Thanks in advance.

Hello friend.
No, you can't retain the AS-PATH when redistributing prefixes from BGP to EIGRP.
What you CAN do though, is to add the AS-PATH you want when redistributing it BACK to BGP.
You can do something like this:
1 - Add a TAG when redistributing the BGP prefixes into EIGRP
route-map SET_TAG permit 10
set tag 100
router eigrp 1
redistribute bgp 100 metric 1 1 1 1 1 route-map SET_TAG
2 - transform the TAG into an AS_PATH, when redistributing it BACK to BGP.
route-map set-as-path-from-tag
set as-path tag
router bgp 100
redistribute eigrp 1 route-map set-as-path-from-tag
Got it ?
I hope this helps you !
cheers

BGP redistribution to EIGRP

Hi all,
I'm trying to redistribute BGP to EIGRP and vice versa. I am succussfully redistributing EIGRP to BGP, but can't get EIGRP routes into BGP.
Here's my config. Any guidance or assistance would be very much appreciated.
router eigrp 100 network 10.18.72.0 0.0.0.255 redistribute static route-map DEFAULT_ROUTE redistribute bgp 65535 passive-interface default no passive-interface FastEthernet0/0!router bgp 65535 bgp router-id 172.18.2.1 bgp log-neighbor-changes redistribute eigrp 100 route-map EIGRP_REDISTRIBUTE neighbor 172.18.2.2 remote-as 65535 neighbor 172.18.2.2 password ciscobgp no auto-summaryip access-list extended EIGRP_ROUTES_TO_BGP permit ip any any!!ip prefix-list DEFAULT seq 5 permit 0.0.0.0/0!route-map EIGRP_REDISTRIBUTE permit 20 match ip address EIGRP_ROUTES_TO_BGP!route-map DEFAULT_ROUTE permit 10 match ip address prefix-list DEFAULT
Thanks in advance.
Neil

Add "bgp redistribute-internal" to your bgp process. By default, iBGP doesn't redistribute into an IGP. The reason for this is simply the amount of routes that a bgp router can receive could overload an igp very easily, so you would definitely want to filter routes out when doing this.
After you add this, clear your bgp neighbors and you should start seeing routes.
HTH,
John
*** Please rate all useful posts ***

Lower Admin Distance of BGP so EIGRP is higher

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for