Lower Tolerance Checking for PM Key
Hi,
For our business process we accept every incoming quantity change made by the vendor in the purchase order response. We accept quantity increments as well as quantity descents. In order to prevent the POR from having to be approved/accepted by the responsible purchaser, we also need a lower limit to customize the same.
Therefore the question is, why is the lower limit input field missing in the PM key? When going through the help file of this customizing transaction we can read the following:
PM: Quantity variance (converted to currency amount)
If a confirmation is expected for a purchase order item, the system calculates the purchase order confirmation net price multiplied by the purchase order confirmation quantity. The system compares this sum with the defined upper and lower limits. You can also define percentage limits for the quantity variance check. Then the percentage variance from the expected quantity calculated - independent of the purchase order price - and this is compared with the defined percentage limits.
As you see above, it is clearly stated that u201CThe system compares this sum with the defined upper and lower limitsu201D. So according to SAP help, lower limit comparison should be possible.
In order for this to work we need the lower limit input fields.
---> Is there any other way to establish the above ?
Thanks and regards,
Aline
Hi,
Priority of tolerances is PO tolerance limit, TOG tolerance grp. for User, TOG tolerance grp. for Vendor (if user not logged on). Even absolute tolerance limit always has priority over percentage limit.
In your case, you need to check PO tolerance first then TOG for user.
regards,
rahul
Similar Messages
-
User exit for lower tolerance check and block of invoices
Hi,
Is there any user exits or ways to block invoices for their lower limits. Presently, for upper tolerance limits, the invoice is blocked, but for lower tolerance limit only a warning message is displayed.
Regards,
Arun MohanHi,
I have the similar problem.
Did you find solution?
Best regards. -
Want to do changes in lower tolerance check in MIRO
Currently miro doesn't work for lower tolerance limit properly.In case of high tolerance limit whenever
limit is exceed traffic light becomes yellow and the message is displayed and posting is not
allowed.This functionality doesn't take place in case of lower tolerance limt.To do this
i need a customer/user exit.Pl tell which one should be used.check according to your requirement
Enhancement
LMR1M001 User exits in Logistics Invoice Verification
LMR1M002 Account grouping for GR/IR account maintenance
LMR1M003 Number assignment in Logistics Invoice Verification
LMR1M004 Logistics Invoice Verification: item text for follow-on docs
LMR1M005 Logistics Inv. Verification: Release Parked Doc. for Posting
LMR1M006 Logistics Invoice Verification: Process XML Invoice
MRMH0001 Logistics Invoice Verification: ERS procedure
MRMH0002 Logistics Invoice Verification: EDI inbound
MRMH0003 Logistics Invoice Verification: Revaluation/RAP
MRMN0001 Message output and creation: Logistics Invoice Verification
LMR1MF0L
LMR1MF0T
LMR1MF1T
LMR1MF1U
LMR1MF26
LMR1MF3L
LMR1MF3M
Business Add-in
INVOICE_UPDATE Business Add-In: Logistics Invoice Verification -
Tolerance Check for Price Variance is not working
Hello,
In SRM 5.0 IMS we have configured a tolerance group with tolerance Key PP to allow Price Variance while Invoice entry.
We have assigned this tolerance group to the user via attribute TOG in the organizational structure (Transaction Code: PPOMA_BBP)
The user to whom this tolerance group is assigned is logged on into the system and created an invoice in the system with the higher amount as compare to the PO. This difference of price is very well within the tolerance limit configured in the system, but still it gives the following errors:
Average price too high: Tolerance limit of 0.00 and USD exceeded (Item 1)
Value too high (tolerance limit of 0.00 and USD exceeded) (Item 1)
Its not checking the tolerance limit assigned to the user through tolerance group.
But the same works when we assign this to vendor group, but this we don't want.
We want the system to check the tolerance group assigned to the user.
Please suggest the solution to reslove the above errors.
Thanks
SarabjeetHi,
Priority of tolerances is PO tolerance limit, TOG tolerance grp. for User, TOG tolerance grp. for Vendor (if user not logged on). Even absolute tolerance limit always has priority over percentage limit.
In your case, you need to check PO tolerance first then TOG for user.
regards,
rahul -
SoftKeyBoard checking for ENTER key
When I put up the softkeyboard for iOS how can I test when the ENTER key has been pressed using actionscript 3.
Currently I listen for the SoftKeyboardEvent.SOFT_KEYBOARD_DEACTIVATE to call a function but would rather do it using the ENTER key (go, search etc return key labelled key).
Please note I am using Flash Pro not Flex.Do you really want to recheck it in a loop? It seems to me that it would be easier to create a separate thread that reads System.in, blocks on it, and then issues an event when it gets something.
-
Checking for Ctrl key after DropTargetDragEvent
Hi,
I need help with a program which contains a table and a tree. A DropTargetDragEvent is fired whenever selected line(s) from the table are dragged to the tree. Upon dragEnter() I do some action. How can I detect if the Ctrl key is pressed at that moment?
Any suggestions are highly appreciated.It doesn't make a difference if I call dropTarget.setDefaultActions(DnDConstants.ACTION_COPY_OR_MOVE) or not.
But I just noticed that event.getDropAction() returns DnDConstants.ACTION_MOVE when I press the SHIFT key and DnDConstants.ACTION_COPY otherwise. This is better than nothing but actually I wanted to detect the CTRL key. -
Invoice tolerance check at company code level
Hi! I know in SRM, the tolerance check for invoice is set up and assigned to a tolerance group which is then assigned to the user attribute. In theory, the tolerance setting should match that of ECC as it does not make sense to meet the tolerance requirement in SRM and then subsequently get block in ECC. However, it is common in ECC that we maintain different tolerance value for different company codes. Is there a way to do the same in SRM? My guess at the moment is that we will have to 'copy' the check in ECC to SRM rather than relying on the tolerance checks in SRM. Am I right to say that? What is the best practice in such situation?
Appreicate you sharing your experience in this.
Cheers!
SFHi. I think the only way to do this is to set the tolerance to 999% via config and PPOMA and assign to all users. This means the standard tolerance check does not apply.
Then use the BBP_DOC_CHECK_BADI to read in whatever tolerances you want based on whatever parameters, and issue an error on screen if the tolerance is exceeded. You can easily RFC into R/3 to get the tolerances from table T169G.
Regards,
Dave. -
Regarding tolerance checks in MIRO
Hi Experts,
We have a requirement to check tolerance checks for Unplanned delivery costs. We need to raise a error message for not allowing the tolerance cheks which are more than 5% for Unplanned delivery cost. Please suggest me the user exit or badi to achieve the same. We have used the user exit MM08R002 but it does not work for Unplanned delivery costs.
Waiting for the reply.
Best Regards,
Amar.Check badi's "MRM_TOLERANCE_GROUP" & "MRM_RELEASE_CHECK"
Regards
Vinod -
Property u201Czero allowedu201D must be identical for all Key Figures.
I am having the following error message when trying to run a Statistical Forecast in the Background. The job cancels out and I receive the error message: Property u201Czero allowedu201D must be identical for all Key Figures.
When I look in RSA1 under Key Figures Details "zero allowed" appears to be checked for all Key Figures. Can anyone point me in the correct direction I've already tried searching and did not find the answer.
Thanks.HI,
The setting is not in RSA1 but is in /SAPAPO/MSDP_ADMIN - Administration of Demand Planning and Supply Network Planning
choose the relevant Planning area right button click on the Planning area choose change key figure settings. From here you can check the flag Zero allowed for the key figure that Stat. FCST is generated.
Best Regards,
Ivo Stoyanov -
Block Payment in MIRO for Lower Tolerance Limit
when we are posting MIRO Transaction
how can we block payment invoice in MIRO Tcode for the Lower Tolerance Limit
As the standard functionality is working for Upper Tolerance Limit, in the same way user needs to
block invoice for Lower Tolerance limit
ThanksHi Ganesh,
below is the user exit where you can check the tolarance and put the Block according to the your requirment.
User Exit name - MM08R002 -User exit for tolerance checks
in the above user exit you have to use the below Function exit.
1) EXIT_SAPLMRMC_001
2) EXIT_SAPLMRMP_001
we implemented the above user exit to put the payment block based on the checks.
You can find the documentation of the above exit in the system.
Thanks
Naresh -
Maintain tolerance limits for tolerance key PE (CoCode S001)
Dear all
im getting error when i creating PO
Maintain tolerance limits for tolerance key PE (CoCode S001)
Please help me
Regards
venu gopalHi
You need to maintain the Tolerance key
PE Price variance, Purchasing
Tolerance limit for system message no. 207. This message appears if the specified effective price exceeds the predefined tolerances when compared with the material price.
Maintain the tolearnce key in
SPRO-> IMG-> Materials Management-> Purchasing-> Purchase Order-> Set Tolerance Limits for Price Variance
If you want the sytem to propmt for a warning or Error message you can configure the same in
SPRO-> IMG-> Materials Management-> Purchasing-> Environment Data-> Define Attributes of System Messages -
Maintain tolerance limits for tolerance key PE
Hi,
How can I correct the error below?
"Maintain tolerance limits for tolerance key PE"
ThanksREFER BELOW SDN POST
Re: TOLERANCE KEY ERROR DURING MIGO
MAINTAIN TOLERANCE LIMITS FOR TOLERANCE KEY PE ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT -
> Please follow this link --> SPRO -> MM-> Purchasing --> Purchase Order --> Set Tolerance limits for price variance --> Here you have to set for Tolerance keys PE and SE. Just copy them from std co. code.
Message was edited by:
SHESAGIRI.G -
Confirmation control key check for inbound delivery creation
Hi,
Currently, in the Client's company, the process of receiving goods from purchase orders looks like that (SAP-wise):
- create a purchase order,
- receive goods using MIGO and automatically create an inbound delivery,
- pack the delivery and post goods receipt.
Recently, some patches have been installed, including one described by note 1602047 (which basically enforces checking confirmation control keys if goods receipt assignment and goods receipt relevance are activated for inbound deliveries). Note says that it only affects two-step stock transfer and creation of automatic inbound deliveries using SPED output but it seems it also affects other basic processes like PO receipt in MIGO.
Now, when using the old control key (that had MRP-Relevant and GR-Relevant fields checked), the system is unable to automatically create an inbound delivery after the goods receipt is posted with MIGO (with message VL148 - Not possible to create an inbound delivery). I learned that this is because the "GR Assignment" field must be checked in the confirmation control key so it's possible to automatically create aninbound delivery after receiving a purchase order in MIGO.
After changing the confirmation control key to have the missing field checked it's not possible anymore to receive goods from PO in MIGO as the PO requires shipping notification in order to be processed in MIGO thus requiring of manual creation of an inbound delivery.
Is there any way to skip this check so the process would remain the same (this model has been working fine for few years in the Client's system) and the inbound delievery would be created automatically after posting the receipt in MIGO?
Thanks in advance,
PiotrHi,
don't know if you found a solution, but we received the following message from SAP:
The advent of the new version requires some attention to the users. It
was necessary to avoid inconsistencies which in the past version the
system was susceptible.
Main Program SAPMM07M
Source code of MM07MLVS
sy-msgid VL sy-msgty E sy-msgno 148
I have checked the process and through debugged I could confirm the
following information SAP is providing to all similar incidents reportedfor us:
Error message VL 148 is issued if in the confirmation control key used
in the purchase order, the fields for MRP-relevance (T163G-KZDIS),
GR relevance (T163G-WEREL) and GR assignment indicator (T163G-WEZUO)
are not set.
The correction of note 1602047 was necessary to avoid inconsistencies
(table EKES) in the purchase order. Without having the GR assignment
(T163G-WEZUO) set, there is no unique reference created between the
purchase order history (table EKBE) and the inbound delivery
confirmation (table EKES) at goods receipt which leads to a problem if
several inbound deliveries exist for the same purchase order.
If you set T163G-WEZUO to 'X', this assures that, for an inbound
delivery, the confirmation record (EKES) belonging to this inbound
delivery (EKES-VBELN) is also accurately updated at goods receipt.
How to solve the issue?
Use a confirmation control key with the GR assignment indicator set
and then create the inbound delivery with VL31N. If you want to be able
to create the inbound delivery with reference to a certain line item in
the PO, use transaction VL34.
If you still want to use transaction MIGO, there is the following
workaround:
- Create a purchase order without any confirmation control key
- Create a goods receipt (GR) in transaction MIGO with reference to this PO and post the GR to a non-HU-managed storage location
- Create a transfer posting with MIGO using movement type 311 to
transfer the goods from the non-HU-managed storage location to the
HU-managed storage location.
As the transfer posting is an additional step for the user, the whole
process could be automated using a partner storage location
(T001l-PARLG) for the GR which then triggers (through a modification)
the BAPI 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE' to create the transfer posting without
user interaction.
I hope to have satisfied you on the reason why it is now happening and
also I believe you can explain to business that it is a new behavior
necessary done from SAP side to avoid worse situations, we are aware of
potential dissatisfaction it might cause. SAP Support is always
available to clarify any issue.
Sorry for not having a more positive answer.
I hope it helps!
Leentje -
Problem with Time Machine for those with low tolerance for seizures.
I need to know if there is a way to switch all the wonderful shuffle and swish of this much needed feature. I have a low tolerance for seizures, not enough to cause me terrible harm but enough to make me violently ill.
The stacking and fast shuffling trigger the first stages of a fit for me at least.
I wonder if there is a way to slow it down or have it static and just use the slider?
I also can't use the iPod style finder either.
This is not a joke or some attempt to flame Leopard. I rate this OSX as one of the best and the nicest to use except for not being able to switch off feature. I was wondering if their is a geek terminal method of altering at least the rate of shuffle. Leopard is much better than Vista. I need help though.Below is a full log from my latest time machine back up. Migration assistant still cannot see it. Any thought would be grateful
Starting automatic backup
Backing up to: /Volumes/Time Machine/Backups.backupdb
Event store UUIDs don't match for volume: Macintosh HD
Deep event scan at path:/ reason:must scan subdirs|new event db|
Finished scan
Found 1669 files (405.2 MB) needing backup
1.86 GB required (including padding), 703.81 GB available
Copied 5541 files (404.5 MB) from volume Macintosh HD.
Using file event preflight for Macintosh HD
Will copy (Zero KB) from Macintosh HD
Found 34 files (Zero KB) needing backup
1.37 GB required (including padding), 703.39 GB available
Copied 1057 files (201 bytes) from volume Macintosh HD.
Created new backup: 2013-03-05-130247
Starting post-backup thinning
Deleted /Volumes/Time Machine/Backups.backupdb/XXX’s MacBook/2013-03-04-075145 (45 KB)
Post-back up thinning complete: 1 expired backups removed
Backup completed successfully. -
Once in a while i get the error
Event ID 6463
The timer service encountered an exception checking for the upgrade mode registry key. Requested registry access is not allowed.
This also happens when i restart the timer service.
I already cleared the SharePoint cache (xml's) but no success with that.
Environment is
SharePoint 2013 SP1 + CU Dec 2014This is a brand new SP13 with SP1 installation after binaries installation i also installed Dec 2014 CU and then created the SP farm.
The Apppool/Timer account is member of WSS_ADMIN_WPG.
Issue can be reproduced with restarting SharePoint Timer Service.
Hereby the Process Monitor output. Hence i filtered it on NOT SUCCESS and Path contains the word UPGRADE
11:37:57,4244851 OWSTIMER.EXE
6272 RegQueryValue
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Shared Tools\Web Server Extensions\15.0\WSS\UpgradeLogLevelOverride
NAME NOT FOUND Length: 144
11:37:57,6632057 OWSTIMER.EXE
6272 RegOpenKey
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Fusion\PublisherPolicy\Default\v4.0_policy.15.0.Microsoft.Office.Access.Services.Moss.Upgrade__71e9bce111e9429c
NAME NOT FOUND Desired Access: Read
11:37:57,6632889 OWSTIMER.EXE
6272 RegOpenKey
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Fusion\PublisherPolicy\Default\policy.15.0.Microsoft.Office.Access.Services.Moss.Upgrade__71e9bce111e9429c
NAME NOT FOUND Desired Access: Read
11:37:57,7140763 OWSTIMER.EXE
6272 RegOpenKey
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Fusion\PublisherPolicy\Default\v4.0_policy.15.0.Microsoft.PerformancePoint.Scorecards.Upgrade__71e9bce111e9429c
NAME NOT FOUND Desired Access: Read
11:37:57,7141089 OWSTIMER.EXE
6272 RegOpenKey
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Fusion\PublisherPolicy\Default\policy.15.0.Microsoft.PerformancePoint.Scorecards.Upgrade__71e9bce111e9429c
NAME NOT FOUND Desired Access: Read
11:37:57,7313089 OWSTIMER.EXE
6272 RegOpenKey
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Fusion\PublisherPolicy\Default\v4.0_policy.15.0.Microsoft.SharePoint.Portal.Upgrade__71e9bce111e9429c
NAME NOT FOUND Desired Access: Read
11:37:57,7313403 OWSTIMER.EXE
6272 RegOpenKey
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Fusion\PublisherPolicy\Default\policy.15.0.Microsoft.SharePoint.Portal.Upgrade__71e9bce111e9429c
NAME NOT FOUND Desired Access: Read
11:37:59,2026527 OWSTIMER.EXE
6272 RegQueryValue
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Shared Tools\Web Server Extensions\15.0\WSS\MS_InternalUse_Only_UpgradeableVersion
NAME NOT FOUND Length: 144
11:37:59,2109400 OWSTIMER.EXE
6272 RegQueryValue
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Shared Tools\Web Server Extensions\15.0\WSS\MS_InternalUse_Only_UpgradeableVersion
NAME NOT FOUND Length: 144
11:38:05,3534303 OWSTIMER.EXE
6272 RegQueryValue
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Shared Tools\Web Server Extensions\15.0\WSS\MS_InternalUse_Only_UpgradeableVersion
NAME NOT FOUND Length: 144
11:38:05,3537846 OWSTIMER.EXE
6272 RegQueryValue
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Shared Tools\Web Server Extensions\15.0\WSS\MS_InternalUse_Only_UpgradeableVersion
NAME NOT FOUND Length: 144
11:38:05,3594290 OWSTIMER.EXE
6272 RegQueryValue
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Shared Tools\Web Server Extensions\15.0\WSS\MS_InternalUse_Only_UpgradeableVersion
NAME NOT FOUND Length: 144
11:38:05,3597316 OWSTIMER.EXE
6272 RegQueryValue
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Shared Tools\Web Server Extensions\15.0\WSS\MS_InternalUse_Only_UpgradeableVersion
NAME NOT FOUND Length: 144
11:38:05,3653094 OWSTIMER.EXE
6272 RegQueryValue
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Shared Tools\Web Server Extensions\15.0\WSS\MS_InternalUse_Only_UpgradeableVersion
NAME NOT FOUND Length: 144
11:38:05,3656118 OWSTIMER.EXE
6272 RegQueryValue
HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Shared Tools\Web Server Extensions\15.0\WSS\MS_InternalUse_Only_UpgradeableVersion
NAME NOT FOUND Length: 144
Maybe you are looking for
-
Hi everyone, ATP is being a real struggle for us and we are for a required balance of not missing out on deadlines and improving the service levels if possible within the constraints. For a product not in stock it or available at a later date, the M
-
How to define the right encoding ???
Hello! How do I define the encoding for a custom document over generic exchange? I get a valid file over FTP into the out-queue (ISO-8859-1). I take it and send it to a vendor. Snooping the HTTP stream, I get utf-8 characters, which I send to my vend
-
New ECC 6.0 system on z/OS - DB2 - good choice?
Hi We are considering a new ECC 6.0 system on z/OS - DB2. Any experiences with the advantages/disadvantages of this platform would be most helpful. Thanks in advance. Mike
-
Where does the EPA will be stored....?
Hi Where does the Transported is going to store? I mean in which location/dir it is going to store? Its urgent, suggest me Thanks
-
Por qué no puedo instalar Acrobat X Pro en Windows 8?
Recientemente adquirí una laptop Dell Inspiron 15R con Windows 8. Ayer adquirí la Creative Suite 6 y pude instalar todos los programas que necesitaba (Illustrator, InDesign y Photoshop), pero no me dejó instalar Acrobat Pro X; me decía que no era pos