Lower Tolerance Checking for PM Key

Hi,
For our business process we accept every incoming quantity change made by the vendor in the purchase order response. We accept quantity increments as well as quantity descents. In order to prevent the POR from having to be approved/accepted by the responsible purchaser, we also need a lower limit to customize the same.
Therefore the question is, why is the lower limit input field missing in the PM key? When going through the help file of this customizing transaction we can read the following:
PM: Quantity variance (converted to currency amount)
If a confirmation is expected for a purchase order item, the system calculates the purchase order confirmation net price multiplied by the purchase order confirmation quantity. The system compares this sum with the defined upper and lower limits. You can also define percentage limits for the quantity variance check. Then the percentage variance from the expected quantity calculated - independent of the purchase order price - and this is compared with the defined percentage limits.
As you see above, it is clearly stated that u201CThe system compares this sum with the defined upper and lower limitsu201D. So according to SAP help, lower limit comparison should be possible.
In order for this to work we need the lower limit input fields.
---> Is there any other way to establish the above ?
Thanks and regards,
Aline

Hi,
Priority of tolerances is  PO tolerance limit,  TOG tolerance grp. for User, TOG tolerance grp. for Vendor (if user not logged on). Even absolute tolerance limit always has priority over percentage limit.
In your case, you need to check PO tolerance first then TOG for user.
regards,
rahul

Similar Messages

  • User exit for lower tolerance check and block of invoices

    Hi,
    Is there any user exits or ways to block invoices for their lower limits. Presently, for upper tolerance limits, the invoice is blocked, but for lower tolerance limit only a warning message is displayed.
    Regards,
    Arun Mohan

    Hi,
    I have the similar problem.
    Did you find solution?
    Best regards.

  • Want to do changes in lower tolerance check in MIRO

    Currently miro doesn't work for lower tolerance limit properly.In case of high tolerance limit whenever
    limit is exceed traffic light becomes yellow and the message is displayed and posting is not
    allowed.This functionality doesn't take place in case of lower tolerance limt.To do this
    i need a customer/user exit.Pl tell which one should be used.

    check according to your requirement
    Enhancement
    LMR1M001                                User exits in Logistics Invoice Verification
    LMR1M002                                Account grouping for GR/IR account maintenance
    LMR1M003                                Number assignment in Logistics Invoice Verification
    LMR1M004                                Logistics Invoice Verification: item text for follow-on docs
    LMR1M005                                Logistics Inv. Verification: Release Parked Doc. for Posting
    LMR1M006                                Logistics Invoice Verification: Process XML Invoice
    MRMH0001                                Logistics Invoice Verification: ERS procedure
    MRMH0002                                Logistics Invoice Verification: EDI inbound
    MRMH0003                                Logistics Invoice Verification: Revaluation/RAP
    MRMN0001                                Message output and creation: Logistics Invoice Verification
    LMR1MF0L
    LMR1MF0T
    LMR1MF1T
    LMR1MF1U
    LMR1MF26
    LMR1MF3L
    LMR1MF3M
    Business Add-in
    INVOICE_UPDATE                          Business Add-In: Logistics Invoice Verification

  • Tolerance Check for Price Variance is not working

    Hello,
    In SRM 5.0 IMS we have configured a tolerance group with tolerance Key ‘PP’ to allow Price Variance while Invoice entry.
    We have assigned this tolerance group to the user via attribute “TOG” in the organizational structure (Transaction Code: PPOMA_BBP)
    The user to whom this tolerance group is assigned is logged on into the system and created an invoice in the system with the higher amount as compare to the PO. This difference of price is very well within the tolerance limit configured in the system, but still it gives the following errors:
    •     Average price too high: Tolerance limit of 0.00 and USD exceeded  (Item 1)
    •     Value too high (tolerance limit of 0.00 and USD exceeded)  (Item 1)
    It’s not checking the tolerance limit assigned to the user through tolerance group.
    But the same works when we assign this to vendor group, but this we don't want.
    We want the system to check the tolerance group assigned to the user.
    Please suggest the solution to reslove the above errors.
    Thanks
    Sarabjeet

    Hi,
    Priority of tolerances is  PO tolerance limit,  TOG tolerance grp. for User, TOG tolerance grp. for Vendor (if user not logged on). Even absolute tolerance limit always has priority over percentage limit.
    In your case, you need to check PO tolerance first then TOG for user.
    regards,
    rahul

  • SoftKeyBoard checking for ENTER key

    When I put up the softkeyboard for iOS how can I test when the ENTER key has been pressed using actionscript 3.
    Currently I listen for the SoftKeyboardEvent.SOFT_KEYBOARD_DEACTIVATE to call a function but would rather do it using the ENTER key (go, search etc return key labelled key).
    Please note I am using Flash Pro not Flex.

    Do you really want to recheck it in a loop? It seems to me that it would be easier to create a separate thread that reads System.in, blocks on it, and then issues an event when it gets something.

  • Checking for Ctrl key after DropTargetDragEvent

    Hi,
    I need help with a program which contains a table and a tree. A DropTargetDragEvent is fired whenever selected line(s) from the table are dragged to the tree. Upon dragEnter() I do some action. How can I detect if the Ctrl key is pressed at that moment?
    Any suggestions are highly appreciated.

    It doesn't make a difference if I call dropTarget.setDefaultActions(DnDConstants.ACTION_COPY_OR_MOVE) or not.
    But I just noticed that event.getDropAction() returns DnDConstants.ACTION_MOVE when I press the SHIFT key and DnDConstants.ACTION_COPY otherwise. This is better than nothing but actually I wanted to detect the CTRL key.

  • Invoice tolerance check at company code level

    Hi! I know in SRM, the tolerance check for invoice is set up and assigned to a tolerance group which is then assigned to the user attribute. In theory, the tolerance setting should match that of ECC as it does not make sense to meet the tolerance requirement in SRM and then subsequently get block in ECC. However, it is common in ECC that we maintain different tolerance value for different company codes. Is there a way to do the same in SRM? My guess at the moment is that we will have to 'copy' the check in ECC to SRM rather than relying on the tolerance checks in SRM. Am I right to say that? What is the best practice in such situation?
    Appreicate you sharing your experience in this.
    Cheers!
    SF

    Hi. I think the only way to do this is to set the tolerance to 999% via config and PPOMA and assign to all users. This means the standard tolerance check does not apply.
    Then use the BBP_DOC_CHECK_BADI to read in whatever tolerances you want based on whatever parameters, and issue an error on screen if the tolerance is exceeded. You can easily RFC into R/3 to get the tolerances from table T169G.
    Regards,
    Dave.

  • Regarding tolerance checks in MIRO

    Hi Experts,
    We have a requirement to check tolerance checks for Unplanned delivery costs.  We need to raise a error message for not allowing the tolerance cheks  which are more than 5% for Unplanned delivery cost. Please suggest me the user exit or badi to achieve the same. We have used the user exit MM08R002 but it does not work for Unplanned delivery costs.
    Waiting for the reply.
    Best Regards,
    Amar.

    Check badi's "MRM_TOLERANCE_GROUP" & "MRM_RELEASE_CHECK"
    Regards
    Vinod

  • Property u201Czero allowedu201D must be identical for all Key Figures.

    I am having the following error message when trying to run a Statistical Forecast in the Background.  The job cancels out and I receive the error message:  Property u201Czero allowedu201D must be identical for all Key Figures. 
    When I look in RSA1 under Key Figures Details "zero allowed" appears to be checked for all Key Figures.  Can anyone point me in the correct direction I've already tried searching and did not find the answer.
    Thanks.

    HI,
    The setting is not in RSA1 but is in /SAPAPO/MSDP_ADMIN - Administration of Demand Planning and Supply Network Planning
    choose the relevant Planning area right button click on the Planning area choose change key figure settings. From here you can check the flag Zero allowed for the key figure that Stat. FCST is generated.
    Best Regards,
    Ivo Stoyanov

  • Block Payment in MIRO for Lower Tolerance Limit

    when we are posting MIRO Transaction
    how can we block payment invoice in MIRO Tcode for the Lower Tolerance Limit
    As the standard functionality is working for Upper Tolerance Limit, in the same way user needs to
    block invoice for Lower Tolerance limit
    Thanks

    Hi Ganesh,
    below is the user exit where you can check the tolarance and put the Block according to the your requirment.
    User Exit name - MM08R002 -User exit for tolerance checks
    in the above user exit you have to use  the below Function exit.
    1) EXIT_SAPLMRMC_001
    2) EXIT_SAPLMRMP_001
    we implemented the above user exit to put the payment block based on the checks.
    You can find the documentation of the above exit in the system.
    Thanks
    Naresh

  • Maintain tolerance limits for tolerance key PE (CoCode S001)

    Dear all
    im getting error when i creating PO
    Maintain tolerance limits for tolerance key PE (CoCode S001)
    Please help me
    Regards
    venu gopal

    Hi
    You need to maintain the Tolerance key
    PE Price variance, Purchasing
    Tolerance limit for system message no. 207. This message appears if the specified effective price exceeds the predefined tolerances when compared with the material price.
    Maintain the tolearnce key in
    SPRO-> IMG-> Materials Management-> Purchasing-> Purchase Order-> Set Tolerance Limits for Price Variance
    If you want the sytem to propmt for a warning or Error message you can configure the same in
    SPRO-> IMG-> Materials Management-> Purchasing-> Environment Data-> Define Attributes of System Messages

  • Maintain tolerance limits for tolerance key PE

    Hi,
    How can I correct the error below?
    "Maintain tolerance limits for tolerance key PE"
    Thanks

    REFER BELOW SDN POST
    Re: TOLERANCE KEY ERROR DURING MIGO
    MAINTAIN TOLERANCE LIMITS FOR TOLERANCE KEY PE ACCOUNT ASSIGNMENT  -
    >  Please follow this link --> SPRO -> MM-> Purchasing --> Purchase Order --> Set Tolerance limits for price variance --> Here you have to set for Tolerance keys PE and SE. Just copy them from std co. code.
    Message was edited by:
            SHESAGIRI.G

  • Confirmation control key check for inbound delivery creation

    Hi,
    Currently, in the Client's company, the process of receiving goods from purchase orders looks like that (SAP-wise):
    - create a purchase order,
    - receive goods using MIGO and automatically create an inbound delivery,
    - pack the delivery and post goods receipt.
    Recently, some patches have been installed, including one described by note 1602047 (which basically enforces checking confirmation control keys if goods receipt assignment and goods receipt relevance are activated for inbound deliveries). Note says that it only affects two-step stock transfer and creation of automatic inbound deliveries using SPED output but it seems it also affects other basic processes like PO receipt in MIGO.
    Now, when using the old control key (that had MRP-Relevant and GR-Relevant fields checked), the system is unable to automatically create an inbound delivery after the goods receipt is posted with MIGO (with message VL148 - Not possible to create an inbound delivery). I learned that this is because the "GR Assignment" field must be checked in the confirmation control key so it's possible to automatically create aninbound delivery after receiving a purchase order in MIGO.
    After changing the confirmation control key to have the missing field checked it's not possible anymore to receive goods from PO in MIGO as the PO requires shipping notification in order to be processed in MIGO thus requiring of manual creation of an inbound delivery.
    Is there any way to skip this check so the process would remain the same (this model has been working fine for few years in the Client's system) and the inbound delievery would be created automatically after posting the receipt in MIGO?
    Thanks in advance,
    Piotr

    Hi,
    don't know if you found a solution, but we received the following message from SAP:
    The advent of the new version requires some attention to the users. It
    was necessary to avoid inconsistencies which in the past version the
    system was susceptible.
    Main Program SAPMM07M
    Source code of MM07MLVS
    sy-msgid VL sy-msgty E sy-msgno 148
    I have checked the process and through debugged I could confirm the
    following information SAP is providing to all similar incidents reportedfor us:
    Error message VL 148 is issued if in the confirmation control key used
    in the purchase order, the fields for MRP-relevance (T163G-KZDIS),
    GR relevance (T163G-WEREL) and GR assignment indicator (T163G-WEZUO)
    are not set.
    The correction of note 1602047 was necessary to avoid inconsistencies
    (table EKES) in the purchase order. Without having the GR assignment
    (T163G-WEZUO) set, there is no unique reference created between the
    purchase order history (table EKBE) and the inbound delivery
    confirmation (table EKES) at goods receipt which leads to a problem if
    several inbound deliveries exist for the same purchase order.
    If you set T163G-WEZUO to 'X', this assures that, for an inbound
    delivery, the confirmation record (EKES) belonging to this inbound
    delivery (EKES-VBELN) is also accurately updated at goods receipt.
    How to solve the issue?
    Use a confirmation control key with the GR assignment indicator set
    and then create the inbound delivery with VL31N. If you want to be able
    to create the inbound delivery with reference to a certain line item in
    the PO, use transaction VL34.
    If you still want to use transaction MIGO, there is the following
    workaround:
    - Create a purchase order without any confirmation control key
    - Create a goods receipt (GR) in transaction MIGO with reference to this PO and post the GR to a non-HU-managed storage location
    - Create a transfer posting with MIGO using movement type 311 to
    transfer the goods from the non-HU-managed storage location to the
    HU-managed storage location.
    As the transfer posting is an additional step for the user, the whole
    process could be automated using a partner storage location
    (T001l-PARLG) for the GR which then triggers (through a modification)
    the BAPI 'BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE' to create the transfer posting without
    user interaction.
    I hope to have satisfied you on the reason why it is now happening and
    also I believe you can explain to business that it is a new behavior
    necessary done from SAP side to avoid worse situations, we are aware of
    potential dissatisfaction it might cause. SAP Support is always
    available to clarify any issue.
    Sorry for not having a more positive answer.
    I hope it helps!
    Leentje

  • Problem with Time Machine for those with low tolerance for seizures.

    I need to know if there is a way to switch all the wonderful shuffle and swish of this much needed feature. I have a low tolerance for seizures, not enough to cause me terrible harm but enough to make me violently ill.
    The stacking and fast shuffling trigger the first stages of a fit for me at least.
    I wonder if there is a way to slow it down or have it static and just use the slider?
    I also can't use the iPod style finder either.
    This is not a joke or some attempt to flame Leopard. I rate this OSX as one of the best and the nicest to use except for not being able to switch off feature. I was wondering if their is a geek terminal method of altering at least the rate of shuffle. Leopard is much better than Vista. I need help though.

    Below is a full log from my latest time machine back up.  Migration assistant still cannot see it.  Any thought would be grateful
    Starting automatic backup
    Backing up to: /Volumes/Time Machine/Backups.backupdb
    Event store UUIDs don't match for volume: Macintosh HD
    Deep event scan at path:/ reason:must scan subdirs|new event db|
    Finished scan
    Found 1669 files (405.2 MB) needing backup
    1.86 GB required (including padding), 703.81 GB available
    Copied 5541 files (404.5 MB) from volume Macintosh HD.
    Using file event preflight for Macintosh HD
    Will copy (Zero KB) from Macintosh HD
    Found 34 files (Zero KB) needing backup
    1.37 GB required (including padding), 703.39 GB available
    Copied 1057 files (201 bytes) from volume Macintosh HD.
    Created new backup: 2013-03-05-130247
    Starting post-backup thinning
    Deleted /Volumes/Time Machine/Backups.backupdb/XXX’s MacBook/2013-03-04-075145 (45 KB)
    Post-back up thinning complete: 1 expired backups removed
    Backup completed successfully.

  • The timer service encountered an exception checking for the upgrade mode registry key. Requested registry access is not allowed.

    Once in a while i get the error
    Event ID 6463
    The timer service encountered an exception checking for the upgrade mode registry key. Requested registry access is not allowed.
    This also happens when i restart the timer service.
    I already cleared the SharePoint cache (xml's) but no success with that.
    Environment is
    SharePoint 2013 SP1 + CU Dec 2014

    This is a brand new SP13 with SP1 installation after binaries installation i also installed Dec 2014 CU and then created the SP farm.
    The Apppool/Timer account is member of WSS_ADMIN_WPG.
    Issue can be reproduced with restarting SharePoint Timer Service.
    Hereby the Process Monitor output. Hence i filtered it on NOT SUCCESS and Path contains the word UPGRADE
    11:37:57,4244851 OWSTIMER.EXE
    6272 RegQueryValue
    HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Shared Tools\Web Server Extensions\15.0\WSS\UpgradeLogLevelOverride
    NAME NOT FOUND Length: 144
    11:37:57,6632057 OWSTIMER.EXE
    6272 RegOpenKey
    HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Fusion\PublisherPolicy\Default\v4.0_policy.15.0.Microsoft.Office.Access.Services.Moss.Upgrade__71e9bce111e9429c
    NAME NOT FOUND Desired Access: Read
    11:37:57,6632889 OWSTIMER.EXE
    6272 RegOpenKey
    HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Fusion\PublisherPolicy\Default\policy.15.0.Microsoft.Office.Access.Services.Moss.Upgrade__71e9bce111e9429c
    NAME NOT FOUND Desired Access: Read
    11:37:57,7140763 OWSTIMER.EXE
    6272 RegOpenKey
    HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Fusion\PublisherPolicy\Default\v4.0_policy.15.0.Microsoft.PerformancePoint.Scorecards.Upgrade__71e9bce111e9429c
    NAME NOT FOUND Desired Access: Read
    11:37:57,7141089 OWSTIMER.EXE
    6272 RegOpenKey
    HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Fusion\PublisherPolicy\Default\policy.15.0.Microsoft.PerformancePoint.Scorecards.Upgrade__71e9bce111e9429c
    NAME NOT FOUND Desired Access: Read
    11:37:57,7313089 OWSTIMER.EXE
    6272 RegOpenKey
    HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Fusion\PublisherPolicy\Default\v4.0_policy.15.0.Microsoft.SharePoint.Portal.Upgrade__71e9bce111e9429c
    NAME NOT FOUND Desired Access: Read
    11:37:57,7313403 OWSTIMER.EXE
    6272 RegOpenKey
    HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Fusion\PublisherPolicy\Default\policy.15.0.Microsoft.SharePoint.Portal.Upgrade__71e9bce111e9429c
    NAME NOT FOUND Desired Access: Read
    11:37:59,2026527 OWSTIMER.EXE
    6272 RegQueryValue
    HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Shared Tools\Web Server Extensions\15.0\WSS\MS_InternalUse_Only_UpgradeableVersion
    NAME NOT FOUND Length: 144
    11:37:59,2109400 OWSTIMER.EXE
    6272 RegQueryValue
    HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Shared Tools\Web Server Extensions\15.0\WSS\MS_InternalUse_Only_UpgradeableVersion
    NAME NOT FOUND Length: 144
    11:38:05,3534303 OWSTIMER.EXE
    6272 RegQueryValue
    HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Shared Tools\Web Server Extensions\15.0\WSS\MS_InternalUse_Only_UpgradeableVersion
    NAME NOT FOUND Length: 144
    11:38:05,3537846 OWSTIMER.EXE
    6272 RegQueryValue
    HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Shared Tools\Web Server Extensions\15.0\WSS\MS_InternalUse_Only_UpgradeableVersion
    NAME NOT FOUND Length: 144
    11:38:05,3594290 OWSTIMER.EXE
    6272 RegQueryValue
    HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Shared Tools\Web Server Extensions\15.0\WSS\MS_InternalUse_Only_UpgradeableVersion
    NAME NOT FOUND Length: 144
    11:38:05,3597316 OWSTIMER.EXE
    6272 RegQueryValue
    HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Shared Tools\Web Server Extensions\15.0\WSS\MS_InternalUse_Only_UpgradeableVersion
    NAME NOT FOUND Length: 144
    11:38:05,3653094 OWSTIMER.EXE
    6272 RegQueryValue
    HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Shared Tools\Web Server Extensions\15.0\WSS\MS_InternalUse_Only_UpgradeableVersion
    NAME NOT FOUND Length: 144
    11:38:05,3656118 OWSTIMER.EXE
    6272 RegQueryValue
    HKLM\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Shared Tools\Web Server Extensions\15.0\WSS\MS_InternalUse_Only_UpgradeableVersion
    NAME NOT FOUND Length: 144

Maybe you are looking for

  • ATP as background job?

    Hi everyone, ATP is being a real struggle for us and we are  for a required balance of not missing out on deadlines and improving the service levels if possible within the constraints. For a product not in stock it or available at a later date, the M

  • How to define the right encoding ???

    Hello! How do I define the encoding for a custom document over generic exchange? I get a valid file over FTP into the out-queue (ISO-8859-1). I take it and send it to a vendor. Snooping the HTTP stream, I get utf-8 characters, which I send to my vend

  • New ECC 6.0 system on z/OS - DB2 - good choice?

    Hi    We are considering a new ECC 6.0 system on z/OS - DB2.  Any experiences with the advantages/disadvantages of this platform would be most helpful. Thanks in advance. Mike

  • Where does the EPA will be stored....?

    Hi Where does the Transported is going to store? I mean in which location/dir it is going to store? Its urgent, suggest me Thanks

  • Por qué no puedo instalar Acrobat X Pro en Windows 8?

    Recientemente adquirí una laptop Dell Inspiron 15R con Windows 8. Ayer adquirí la Creative Suite 6 y pude instalar todos los programas que necesitaba (Illustrator, InDesign y Photoshop), pero no me dejó instalar Acrobat Pro X; me decía que no era pos